From the Shelby Business Journal
Earth is 100% flat: Boxing legend Carl Froch accuses NASA of being ‘fake space agency.’
For those who look to sportsmen as their hero’s maybe they will believe what they say, too.
CLICK HERE for article.
Here is Mike Adams claiming that Disclosure is coming. We have all heard that before. Of course, his source is from trustworthy NASA! Adams claims that it was a scientist named Levin that discovered this in 1976 (another Mason). We know better than that!
Adams claims that NASA retracted this microbial life on Mars information for fear of how the people will react – that there will be hysteria. Evening though the public believes that there are other planets and possible life on other worlds – which is totally wrong – they would not think the world would come to an end with simple biological life forms on another planet. After all, people back then had the worry of the Soviet Union invading or their own government, and not what lives in the soil on Mars! The globe earth believers they know this is a far cry from “War of the Worlds” radio broadcast by Orson Wells back in 1939.
IF there is a “disclosure” it would be backed by the US Government using some of their hidden technology to scare people; make it look like Aliens. And the message, of course, would be from our government, “We must all unite under the New World Order, or the Aliens will use their ray-guns and kill us all.” Or, a variation of this would be: the Aliens would talked to our “leaders” and would say, “Earthlings should all united under a one-world government in order to save your planet.”
Perhaps the government is deciding what will be better before this “disclosure” by using holographic images projected in the sky to make people think that there are thousands of space crafts floating over head, or some other method, like actually nuking a city and blaming it on the Aliens – who knows.
This audio get more hilarious as you listen. At about 8 minutes in, Adams says that NASA is sending a helicopter to Mars. He says that, according to NASA, Mars has an atmosphere of 0.6 of that of earth – basically zero. He says that helicopters can’t fly (nor planes for that matter) in such a vacuum or low density atmosphere – and he is right. However, this is where Adams screws up. He obviously believes that there will be a satellite with a helicopter going to Mars but that it really has an atmosphere (therefore, life)!
Instead of seeing the lie that this whole space mission is a fraud, including the so-called helicopter, Adams thinks that NASA is lying about the atmosphere!
What fools Mike Adams (maybe he is not fooled but is trying to fool us) is, that the government knows that there are people who believe in conspiracies. So, to fool the Truth Seekers, they come out with something and cover it up. The fact that it’s covered up, the government makes it look like they are covering up the truth. So, Patriots who believe in conspiracies will automatically think, “This is a conspiracy; the truth is just the opposite,” when, in fact, the whole thing is a lie! So, the liars are sitting back laughing at us.
Most times when the government covers up something, they are covering up the truth. But they realise who they can control the opposition by doing just the opposite to get us to believe a lie. In the Bible we read:
Matthew 24:24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.
Mark 13:22 For false Christs and false prophets shall rise, and shall shew signs and wonders, to seduce, if it were possible, even the elect.
It it were possible the very elect would be fooled. Which means, we, as Christians should be on guard. An example would be:
Truth Seekers detect a cover up, a retraction, then automatically believe what was covered up was the truth. Therefore, actually believing a lie. Then, by implication:
The reality is, that the whole thing is a lie! And this is how the opposition is controlled. Remember what the mass-murderer Lenin said – In order to control the opposition, become the opposition.
At about 9:45 in Adams makes a comment about the flat earth. He doesn’t believe it because, “logically, you need a sphere to fill up space…” This audio is really a laugh a minute! He goes on to explain his position on the flat earth by saying, “How do satellites work? How does GPS work?”
Well, if he had listen to flat earth videos or seen some of them here, he would know that. But let’s not listen to the opposition to find out why they believe in what they do; oh, no, that means they would have to change their mind – and become a flat earther!
He goes on to say that he appreciates people who don’t believe in NASA and they are like other government agencies where they do lie. Yet, he doesn’t explain why he believes them. Adams admit, “That NASA is joke; a total joke.” Then why did he put some much faith in them in the beginning of this audio?
Adams goes on to say that NASA origins was started by Nazi scientist, “Operation Paper Clip.” This is such a lie it’s amazing that he has the audacity to push it. Stop and think about this: The Allies beat the Axis, yet somehow, right after the war they came to America to start and take control of NASA? No, the fact is, that America took these scientists (as well as other nations) to have them work for the US Government. Yes, they were rocket scientists, as NS Germany were the leaders. However, building missiles and rockets does not prove that there are other planets or prove that there is a space with a vacuum. All scientists, including Werner von Braun knows you can’t fly a rocket in a vacuum. Such an experiment can be done in a lab. And they certainty would have done tests even if they believed there was space with a vacuum.
About 14 minutes in Adams talked about what he said at a recent meeting – that he talks about science fiction topics. Here is what he said, in part, “That I discuss anti-matter fuel, energy harvesting from pulsars and anti-distribution fuel and logistics.” This is amazing! Mike Adams must be an Alien, or is in contact with someone from space to tell him this. What a JOKE! This is all science fiction stuff, it doesn’t exist. Or, if there is something like this that exists, he wouldn’t know about it; it would be Top Secret research at Area 51 or some other military base.
At 18:00 Adams talks about various theories that he doesn’t believe in, which I don’t either. One of them is the hollow earth theory. He said, this contradicts the flat earth theory. Now, this is where Mike Adams thinking is mixed up. People who believe in the hollow earth theory usually are not flat earth believers but he implies that they are, as he says, “How can one believe in the hollow earth and the flat earth, as one contradicts the other.” Well, what makes him think that only something that is a sphere can be hollow? You can have a hollow cube, a hollow disk or anything of any shape. Adams must think that when we say flat earth, he thinks of it as a piece of paper! What a joke! We flat earth believers know that people can and do live underground – it’s called a cave! I just point this out to show the muddled thinking Adams is engaged in.
For those who are not flat earth believers, when we say “flat earth” that is not the 3-dimensional shape of it, it’s just the surface and that is only used as an easy way to describe earth, for we flat earthers know that the flat earth has mountains, hills and valleys that is on the surface. But we also know that it has a depth to it; to what size and shape we do not know but we know that it’s not literally as flat and think as a piece of paper.
We know that you can drill down to 40,000 feet for oil, for example. This means that you can make caves where people can live. Do we not have old missiles silos that have been converted to underground living quarters? Of course we do – and the earth is still flat!
I tried to make a Comment and they say, “Hold on, this is waiting to be approved.” I waited and it was NOT approved! Now, this Brighteon platform is SUPPOSE to be an alternative to YouTube, a place where you can have freedom of thought, and what does Mike Adams do? He has Comments censored! Heck, even YouTube doesn’t do that. A YouTube channel might be banned but if it’s still up, so are all the Comments; there is no waiting for approval, it’s automatically approved! But not with Adams site. By the way, you have to be approved on Brighteon before you can start a channel AND you are limited, at first, to the number of viewers you can have, AND the number of videos you can post. So much for his alternative video platform!
Mike Adams can only trusted be for his health information news – but you better keep an eye out for this, too, as you might be thrown a curve ball.
There are only 13 Comments at the time of this writing and most of them don’t believe in what Mike Adams said here. By the way, he did say that he is a pilot. Now, this is new, you would think he would have said something in one of his many articles or videos. What other amazing talents does Adams have?
If you want to listen to this BS audio, here it is:
You may ask, “But what about all those rocket with astronauts and satellites on them – didn’t they go into outer space?” Though the rockets are real, they did not go to where you thought they went – check out this video and find out more…
19 October, 2019 The latest fake globe earth news if of the all-women space walk. Notice how they are gently floating, that is because they are – in water! You can not be attached to the space station when it’s supposedly going 17,000 mph. Ask any globe earth believers how is it possible to be outside of a vehicle that is going 17,000 mph and not be left behind? How are it the astro-nots able to keep up with the space station? Even if they were attached to the space station, they would be violently thrown back.
People who believe everything they read in the newspapers would say, “It’s because of gravity; it’s because they are in a vacuum,” giving magical qualities to everything that can’t be answered. Well, the fact is, that regardless of something being in a vacuum or not, there would still be the speed. The question is, “Are they flying at thousands of miles an hour or are they not?”
Wind, as you know, can be natural or it can be created by a moving object.
Now, there are those who say, “Maybe the space station stopped and that is why they are not left behind.” If that is the case, then where is the huge amount of fuel stored? Where is the huge tank to store the oxygen needed to burn it? And, why isn’t the fuel nozzle shown and the exhaust ever shown from the space station? If the craft is stationary when the space walk is done how can they speed up to 17,000 mph? If there is a “jet stream,” how can there be one in the “vacuum” of space?
The fact is, that NASA has told us many times over the past decades that the astronauts are taking their space walk while going around the earth at 17,000 mph (or whatever speed). So, what are they going to do, back track, or destroy any recordings that say this?
Back to reality…
If you were flying in plane going only 150 mph, and had your hand out the window, you’d have wind pushing your hand back at that speed. If you jumped out of the plane, you would be slowing down and the plane would leave you behind. Now, even if you are in a vacuum, you would still have wind, but it would not consist of the atmospheric gases that we have. If space is made of some kind of ether, that we are told many years ago, you would have this “ether” pushing your hand back.
Now, imagine going 17,000 mph our, your body would not be able to take it. If you were really in a space station going this fast, as soon as you opened the hatch – even before you went outside – you would be suck out so violently that you would die immediately. Keep in mind this is what happens if you are in a passenger plane going at the comparatively slow speed of 500 mph. In short, you would not be going at the same speed, floating around and be able to move your arms and legs against the direction you are being pushed.
One last thought, notice in a short scene the green ocean? How can we have blue in all the other pictures and green in this one. Did that mean algae spread world-wide in a short period of time then turn blue again?
.
.
According to the wakingtimes.com alternative news site there will be satellites that will beam down 5-G radiation; that they will ‘carpet bomb’ the earth. Space X will launch close to 12,000 satellites, we are told. We are warned that there will be no ‘where to hide.’
The article goes on to say about the frequencies are very short, which causes more danger to all of life. It goes on to say that because of the very short wavelength, it will not be able to penetrate walls.
It’s true that 5-G is much more dangerous and that they can’t penetrate walls. From previous research that I’ve done, 5-G towers will have to be place about every 100 hundred of meters.
The article goes on to say: But, there’s a problem: Those tiny wavelengths aren’t strong enough to get through walls, trees and other solid objects. The solution: Multiple small phone masts, placed very close together (around 100 metres apart), and operating at much higher currencies than existing phone masts.
Since these towers have to be approximately 100 meters apart, hasn’t this researcher realised, ‘How in the hell can 5-G satellites work from space?’ I wish that more Truth Seekers stop and think. First, we know that there is no space as we are told from astronomers, so anything that is traveling across the earth is not thousands of miles up, but they will still have to be about 50,000 feet or more up so they will be out of commercial flight paths. Well, that is 6-10 miles above earth! So, how in the heck can they reach us when they are much, much further away to be effective?
The article also touches on that we get signals from satellites so we can enjoy our mobile phones anywhere on earth. Another proof that there are no satellites, as we know them, is IF there were, why don’t we get signals when we are in a rural valley?
Many times we experience or read of someone who has experienced not getting a signal where they live or a very poor one; not once in a while but all the time! Well, if satellites were up their floating around beaming 3-G frequencies now, we should not have problems like this, or only rarely. And we would have no need to ground towers. Why put up ground towers when ‘satellites’ can do this and blanket a much larger area?
This is just another proof that we flat earth believers say is true.
5-G technology should never be used as it only has military uses: killing people. And that we should live as far as possible away from these towers. Now, this article from wakingtimes.com says, ‘There is no place to hide…’ is false. IF you fall into the para-dime that we are being beamed from satellites, it would be true. But since we are not, and that towers have to be put on the ground, means that you can reduce your chance of being exposed. How? Move to a very rural area or move to another country.
It takes money to buy these micro-wave towers and the poor countries can’t afford them or can’t afford as many of them. They might have them in their largest cities but not in the smaller towns. So, there is a place to ‘hide’! Or at least a place where your exposure to 5-G radiation would be less. In the meantime, if the people who are exposed the most, such as those living in cities in the US, will start dying en mass, tell me, who will be putting the towers up? There would be too many people home sick and dying.
We just have to pray that people will wake up and stop this madness before it destroys us all.
From 2010
Easy. Destroy its literacy, and you’ve dumbed it down (new word to the dictionary ;-). And once dumbed down, it becomes the potential victim of any unscrupulous power that wants to dominate it.
Recently I had occasion to read several bound volumes of the Century Magazine, published in the early days of the last century. The quality of the articles and the diversity of subject matter revealed a general literacy of a very high order. They were written for a public that not only could read but had great curiosity and interest about the
world. In those days, Americans had independent intelligence and an insatiable appetite for knowledge in all fields.
Today there are few magazines that still cater to a dwindling literate population. And
none of them have the breadth and depth of what was published a hundred years ago.
And while our technological advances have given us marvelous gadgets for
communication, most of them are used today to record and play popular music, create
video games, and send emails. Nobody writes letters anymore. We either send emails
or greeting cards with messages for every occasion. The American brain just doesn’t
function the way it used to. It’s been replaced by emotion, ignorance, and wishful
thinking.
If you look at the most illiterate nations on the planet, you find that they are ruled by
despots, live in abject poverty, and have no hope for a better future. That doesn’t mean
that literate nations, like Germany, can’t produce political monsters. But when they do,
we know that satanic influences are behind it. Literacy is not immune from evil. It can
be used for evil purposes. But a Constitutional Republic is supposed to be so
constructed as to make evil unlikely to prevail.
America, from its beginning, was arguably the most literate nation on earth, and the result
was positive in every respect. Why was it so literate? Because the people were
governed by the precepts of the Bible, and biblical literacy was paramount in the
education of the nation’s children.
But once Americans succumbed to government schooling, which eliminated God from
the curriculum, it became possible to introduce teaching methods deliberately intended to
dumb down the nation.
All of this was done in the early days of the last century by our Progressive educators
who no longer believed in the religion of their fathers. They now put their faith in
science, which explained how the material world worked; evolution, which explained the
origin of living matter, organisms spontaneously created in some sort of primordial
soup; and behavioral psychology, which gave the educators the means to remove the soul
from human beings and control their behavior like animals. And the Progressives have
succeeded beyond their wildest dreams.
And these Progressives were also Socialists. Why? Because they had to deal with the
problem of evil, and they decided that evil was caused by our capitalist system in which
competition and the pursuit of wealth were driving forces. But Socialism would
eliminate evil, by eliminating competition, making everyone economically equal, and
eliminating social injustice.
And so the Progressives embarked on a long-range program to convert America from a
capitalist, individualistic society to a collectivist, egalitarian society. And after a
hundred years of unremitting effort, they have finally captured the machinery of political
and economic power.
The question is: are there enough Bible believing, individualistic Americans, willing to
do whatever it will take to preserve our Constitutional Republic? I recently watched a
video on YouTube about how Cesar Chavez became dictator of Venezuela. He
promised to take money from the rich and give it to the poor. Naturally, the poor
became his chief supporters and they have bought the socialist promise of equality and
social justice hook, line and sinker. As long as he has oil money he can shower the poor
with goodies. The ultra rich could make deals with the dictatorship. But the middle
class has found it impossible to survive under Chavez, and anyone with any ambition is
leaving the country. And where are many of them going? To the United States.
But what if the United States goes socialist? Where will Americans go? One solution
is for conservatives to move en mass to one of the states that did not vote for Obama and
create a truly conservative state government that will resist the socialist pressures from
Washington. Which state would that be?
But perhaps that will not be necessary if in 2010 the American people get rid of the
present left-wing Congress in power, and replace the socialists with conservative lovers
of Constitutional government. A prospect devoutly to be wished.
IT may be thought that there are a sufficient number of Periodicals in the market without adding one more to the extensive list. There are plenty no doubt, if they were all of the right kind. But are they? How many of them profess to stand by the Word of God as true and faithful in all its parts. And of those who profess to uphold the sacred Scriptures as inspired of God, how many believe and advocate the literal truth of the account of Creation as recorded therein? or the various descriptions given by them of the works of God as found in what is called Nature? Not one! At least, we know not of any.
Not a single Christian Editor who in the face of the so-called “Science’’ of the nineteenth century dare contend for the literal truth of the Bible text given at the heading of this paper ? We repeat it, we know of none. We know of many, and some loud in their profession that they believe the Bible to be the inspired Word of God, who yet have declined to allow us, or our friends, to uphold in their columns the literal truth of the Bible in all its references to the material Creation. We deplore this fact; and hence the necessity has been laid upon us, with all our weakness, physically or numerically, to come to the rescue in The Flat Earth Review. God is able to use the weakest instrumentality to his own glory, and to the confusion of the enemies of his truth. Our trust is in God; and in the faithfulness of his Word, in all its teachings from Genesis to Revelation. Our {»otto is, Let God be true, though every man be a liar.
If Genesis is not to be relied upon, in its description of Creation, how shall we trust Exodus? If the Old Testament is not true, what will Become of the New? If the Creator, through his servants, the prophets has not correctly described his Works, how can we trust him for our salvation? As the great Teacher, who came from God, himself declared; “If ye believe not his (Moses) writings, how shall ye believe my words? They stand or fall together. Our Lord says so ; and every logical and candid mind must see it is so. We are prepared to accept the conclusion for we feel sure that no fact in nature is contrary to Bible teaching.
It is well-known that the teachings of modern Astronomy are opposed to the teachings of the Bible; but it is not so well understood that all known facts in nature are in harmony with Bible representations. Thomas Paine, in his so-called “ Age of Reason” says:
“ The two beliefs ”—Modern Astronomy and the Bible—“ cannot be held together in the same mind : he who thinks he believes both has thought very little of either.”
This witness is true here. But he makes the very common mistake of assuming, or supposing, that Astronomy must be true ; and hence he draws the unwarrantable conclusion that the Bible must be false. This is not “ reason, ” but assumption ; and is surely an unpardonable offence against good logic on the part of one who professes to “reason ” We call the attention of our sceptical friends to its inconclusiveness. Give us facts, or sound “ reasons ” based on facts, and we will listen to our opponents with attention; but it will be the province of The Earth Review to expose from time to time the flimsy pretexts for reason which so frequently are placed before us by those who oppose the Word of the living God on questions of Cosmology. We want the facts of Science, not
We want the facts of Science, not in its every varying theories and contradictions. For these facts we shall ever be glad to find room, in proportion to their importance and our space. But, we candidly confess at the outset that we do not know of any one fact in Nature which conflicts with the accounts of the Creation or Universe, as set forth in the Holy Scriptures. The God of Creation or of Nature, is the God of Revelation; and both these we believe to be in harmony.
As flat earth believers, I think our people should know about Noah’s Flood, since this is a major cataclysmic even that happened to the earth.
This video also covers the objections that evolution’s would have.
There is a big split in Christianity as to the Flood being local or word-wide. You’ve heard the local argument, now listen to the world-wide argument.
Those who oppose the world-wide flood is because it would not account for the different races we have today. The problem is, that they haven’t thought that other races were brought on the Ark, too. Then, after the flood you have some people mixing outside of their race, which does not produce another race but a hybrid.
If you notice, those who advocate the local flood theory, thy DON’T answer the simply biblical statements that you see in the beginning of this video. Some examples are:
Why did God have Noah and his family cross over the mountains instead of building a ship that took 100 years to complete?
Why would the animals have to be saved when there were plenty more on the othher side of the hills?
Why did God have a rainbow to indicate there would not be another flood (world-wide), when, in fact there have been many more local floods?
How can there be water of several meters over the highest hill, when, in reality, there would have to be some higher that contains the water?
I would like to make a comment about the last part of the video. Where it says about other tribes in different parts of the world, their local tradition says that some people survived by being on a raft for several months; other tribes say that man was saved in on ‘floating box.’ Yes, these races have their traditions that was handed down thousands of years, but like everything that is handed down verbally, facts are left out and other information is inserted.
My explanation of this is, that these other races came far and wide, like the animals, and entered into the ark. Then, when the animals were released, they too travel to different lands. The stories that were told was put into their own words; to their limited knowledge and that is why they used words like ‘floating box.’ As for stories where a few survivors lived on a raft for several months were simply not true. The main reason is, that God said ALL flesh died on the earth (except those that were on the Ark). God does NOT lie so, the story of some men and women living on a raft was made up, when, in actuality, they were on the Ark. Another reason is, that you can’t live several months on raft without food and fresh water. Also, rafts can not take the high seas like a ship can, which is what the Ark was. Aside from this, this video does a good job of explaining a world-wide flood.
.
Christian Flat Earth Ministry 
How To Tell If Someone Is Lying In 5 Minutes Or Less
How To Tell If Someone Is Lying In 5 Minutes Or Less
How would you like to tell if someone is lying to you in five minutes? You can if you know what to look for. We have all been lied to and in many cases it could effect your relationship, cost you money and time, hired the wrong person or rented your property to someone you shouldn’t. Knowing when someone is lying could also save you from believing in an event that really didn’t happen could effect you destiny. Not being able to catch a person (or government) in a lie could prevent you from doing more research.
If someone believes what NASA tells them, for example, you won’t spot this. But if a NASA scientist is being interviewed, you might be able to spot the lie – if you know what to look for.
What to look for when someone is lying?
There are many signs – too much to include in this short article. But I’ll give you enough to spot a liar.
Eyes: Eye contact is not made or made just a short time as a liar thinks that you can read their eyes. In a way you can – by them seeing that they are not making contact when contact is usually made. He may dart his eyes or move them side to side.
Hands and Arms: The person’s hands and arms are less expressive. Fists might be made or hands kept in his pockets. There is less expression in the movement of the arms. Palms can go face down. Artificial movement is made with the arms – there is a lack of fluidity.
The person will make little or no eye contact.
• Physical expression will be limited, with few arm and hand movements. What arm and hand movements are present will seem stiff, and mechanical. Hands, arms, and legs pull in toward the body; the individual takes up less space.
• His hand(s) may go up to his face or throat. But contact with his body is limited to these areas. He is also unlikely to touch his chest with an open hand gesture.
• If he is trying to appear casual and relaxed about his answer, he may shrug a little.
Incongruity in Emotions: When a person shakes their head from side to side and answering ‘yes’.
A person that grins when there should be sadness. This may be very short, so you have to observe carefully.
Timing: When a hand movement is made as an afterthought. He wants to get his words out first then adds hand movements as if to convince you what he said is true. If you wanted to convince someone that you were angry when you really weren’t, you would want to play the part and look angry. But there’s more to it than that. The timing of that angry facial expression matters. Think of Greta Thunberg who spoke on climate change before the UN! Notice how exaggerated every expression was. Even though she has Asperger’s Syndrome, it was false. The lie, in this case came from bad acting.
Contradiction and Consistency: Think of a woman who says she loves you but frowns. Or shouts that she loves you while raising her fist; hands tightly clench when she should be in a state of pleasure. In other words, emotions and gestures are out of synch.
Lack of Spontaneity: A response that is not genuine is not spontaneous. There could be a slight deadly in showing emotion. Or, the response goes on longer than a case of genuine emotion. If the emotion ends quickly, this is a sign of lying. Or, the emotion comes and goes quickly.
The Forced Smile: If the smile is made tight and there’s no movement in the eyes or forehead. If the smile does not reflect a true emotion, it will not encompass his entire face. The forced smile covers the anger or disgust that a person might ordinarily have.
Head Shift: If someone is listening to something that is uncomfortable for him, his head will shift away from the speaker. This is an attempt to distance themselves from the source of the discomfort. Watch for immediate or pronounced jerking of the head or a slow and deliberate withdrawal.
If you remember the video of the first TV interview given my Neil Armstrong, Michael Collins and Buzz Aldrin gave. The normal reaction of being the first men on the Moon and with the joy and festivity of the world celebration, their reactions should have been entirely different. What we had seen was three men who were sad, did not give direct eye contact, looked down no smiling and lack of happy emotions. Instead, being happy, smiling, moving their hands and arms and giving direct eye contact. In short what Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin showed – without using words – is that they were lying and everything they represented was a lie.