Transparent Deception In Yet Another Alleged Extra-Solar Planet Discovery

Transparent Deception In Yet Another Alleged Extra-Solar Planet Discovery


All major TV and Print and Net “News” Media reported on 8/24/04 a “discovery of an Earth-like planet…some 50 light years away…that is bright enough to be seen with the naked eye”. 

“Super Earth-like planet discovered” – Written by CBC News Online staff)

It has become standard practice to pass off this type of computer-created spectrographic virtual-reality imaging as scientific truth. As can be seen, the real truth is that of all this phony hype rests on deceptive conclusions derived from baseless premises dependent upon an ever accumulating mountain of assumptions. These assumptions are then further expanded and built into the world’s “knowledge” controlling sacred cow which we call The Theoretical Science Establishment.

That this Establishment itself is merely a bogus secular front for the religion of Kabbala-based Pharisaic Judaism is a long-held secret that is now out of the bag. This once hidden agenda is presently entering its final stages of conquering and perverting all of man’s “knowledge”. This conquest involves destroying Bible Credibility by destroying belief in its “Creation Account” of the origin of the universe, Earth, and mankind in six literal days…and replacing that record with Evolution’s “creation account” covering 15 billion years (an age assigned to the process by Kabbalist Nechunya ben HaKanna 2000 years ago).

Aside from the blatantly fraudulent claims upheld solely by virtual-reality computer-created images of anything they want to “discover”, the steady stream of “News” reports now describe as factual all extraterrestrial evolution claims based on that 15 billion year time frame. Thankfully, these reports invariably claim something that reveals the Mickey Mouse Math propping up the whole show.

Indeed, so transparently false is this latest “discovery” that it is almost as if the Kabbalists behind it are testing to make sure that everyone has been so thoroughly dumbed down and brainwashed by their Space Science comic book stories from NASA, etc., that there can no longer be any danger of an uprising that would focus on destroying the vulnerable Copernican Keystone of evolution-based cosmology, and, by so doing, force centuries–and even millennia–of deception into a global limelight.

For example, consider the claim in this “new discovery” of an alleged planet the size of Uranus. This newly “discovered planet” is said to be 50 light years away from Earth, but still “…bright enough to be seen with the naked eye”:

First of all, Uranus itself is about 3/4 of one billion miles away from Earth according to the standard charts. It cannot be seen with the naked eye.

Now, sharpen your pencil (or bring up your calculator) and figure how far One Light Year is in miles…starting with 86,300 miles per second, of course.

Speed of lightDid you get 11,178,000 (eleven million one hundred and seventy eight thousand) miles for One Light Minute?

Good. How about One Light Hour? 670,680,000 miles, right?

And One Light Day? 16,096,320,000 miles. OK? (So One Light Day is over 16 billion miles, i.e., some 20 times as far away as the planet Uranus. Check?)

Now we get to One Light Year (365 x 16,096,320,000) = c. 5,875,000,000,000 miles. That is almost Six Trillion miles for One Light Year. The alleged new planet is said to be some 50 Light Years distant, (…right at our elbows in astronomy speak).

So, now we determine the distance involved in 50 Light Years, i.e., 50 x 5,875,000,000,000 and find that it equals c. 293,750,000,000,000 miles. That is almost 300 trillion miles. One trillion is 1000 x 1,000,000,000. Since we have some 294 trillion, we have 294,000 x 1,000,000,000 miles that this alleged planet is said to be from the Earth!

As my dad used to say when, as a boy, I would do or say something that didn’t make sense: “Use your head for something besides a hat rack!” Look: If we can’t even see the planet Uranus 3/4 of one billion miles away “with our naked eye”, how in the world can we see this alleged earth-like planet claimed to be the size of Uranus “with our naked eye” when we are told that it is 294 trillion miles away?!!

Use your head for something besides a hat rack! The False Science Puppet of the Talmudist/Kabbalist elite has jerked you and me and the rest of the world around long enough with these devilish lies. Wake up!

What we are dealing with here is a scant 50 light years in astronomy speak. We all know, of course, that there is an unrelenting media drumbeat feeding us similar “scientific information” about fantasized stars and galaxies and nebula “out there” in mega-deep space where the Klingons et al have all evolved out of gases and stuff and are up to no good.

This computer-produced video-game “science” tells us that all these components in this factless Kabbalist Universe are hundreds, and thousands, and millions, and up to 15 billion of light years away from Earth!! Try to crunch those numbers down to miles or kilometers and your calculator will melt before your very eyes and the whole effort could cause permanent drain bramage. Wake up!

If you think it is impossible that the whole cosmological paradigm upholding terrestrial and extraterrestrial evolutionism is totally based on deception without one fact to its credit, just begin exposing the Copernican Root of all these cunning deceptions and watch that whole paradigm crash and burn.

Look: There are huge telescopes and satellite dishes all over the world that cost many billions of dollars. These instruments are being employed around the clock to fix permanently in people’s minds a belief in the 15 billion year evolution of the universe, the Earth, and mankind. This uninterrupted agenda exists solely to seek out evolving extraterrestrial life and to protect the Bible-destroying Kabbalist Big Bang “creation scenario” from attack.

These telescopes record the stars going around the Earth every night, [See: Size-Structure Pt 4] but no, no, no; we can’t have that! (“Don’t you know the earth is rotating, you idiot, and that makes it look like the stars are going around?!) The Truth about those telescopes (Hubble included) is that never, never, never has a single one of them ever, ever, ever been able to resolve (give size and shape to) one single star! It is all phony baloney! See for yourself from their quotes. (Read the whole thing [Part VI] and understand the magnitude of the deception emanating from the Space “Science” mind-control apparatus….)

That is what we are dealing with. It’s raw deception from start to finish. But, if we will use the truths now becoming available to us, and shake ourselves awake out of this global mesmerizing stupor induced by faith in a false science Idol, we will very quickly and fully understand what incredibly monstrous deceptions have been pumped into our minds by that anti-Bible, anti-Christ, Pharisaic religion masquerading as “science”!

One more little detail: The same article reporting this latest “discovery” of a Uranus-sized planet 50 light years beyond Earth also said: “More of the estimated 125 ‘extra-solar’ planets have been about the size of Jupiter” (Ibid.).

This is another unvarnished lie. Except through virtual reality computer- programmed simulations based on fraudulent claims about redshift and infrared technology in space, [See: Redshift Fraud] there has never been a planet “discovered” outside this misnamed “solar” system. Period.

Anyone determined to know the truths that expose how this Kabbala-based mythology has blinded the world with its “science falsely so called” (I Tim. 6:20, 21) can know those truths. Those who have never thought about such a challenge to the evolutionary underpinning of all that modern man calls “science” are going to have some reading to do. First, in order to understand and know for a fact how a belief in an evolved universe, Earth, and mankind now underpins all of modern man’s “knowledge” get jump-started with the facts in these seven pages. [See: Knowledge Impact]

Once that indisputable information is understood, go for a clear historical understanding about the Copernican Revolution. See how it paved the way for the Darwinian Revolution (& the Panspermia Revolution in spite of its being an observation-denying model based entirely on assumptions.

Then, if you want to understand how fraudulent technology has produced the Big Bang Kabbalic Kosmological Paradigm, read this first; then add in these facts.

Do you know what Talmudism has to say about ethics, sex, a master race, Jesus, the Bible, etc.? Do you want to know?? [See: Talmud] Do you want to know what Mystic Kabbalism teaches about Tarot Cards, magical numbers, creating sub-humans, Zionism, Dispensationalism, Copernicanism, a 15 billion year old universe, a Big Bang Expanding Universe?? If you do, check out the titles of the seven-part series on “The Kabbala” and pick one and read it. (It’s fascinating stuff. I’ll bet many of you will end up reading all of ‘em….)

Having gone that far, it would be a good idea to just scroll through the descriptive titles of over a hundred links…reading whatever gets your attention. Doing this will provide a pretty good overview of the truly mind-boggling ramifications that flow naturally and inexorably from exposing the universally believed Copernican Model.

That Model is, in short, the greatest of all deceptions throughout human history that has ever been designed to confuse and lead mankind away from God’s Truth…. (I Cor.14:33)


Another Week, Another False Claim

“New Class of Planets Found” one reads in the “Universe Today” summary for August 31, 2004. The pertinent text–accompanied by a now-familiar, photo-like fake image showing an alleged star shinning on an alleged planet–tells us:

Astronomers announced today that they have discovered a new class of extra solar planets which are between 10 and 20 times the mass of the Earth – roughly the same size as Neptune. Two planets were discovered orbiting smaller stars: one around Gilese 436 and another around 55 Cancri…. They were discovered using the radial velocity method, which finds planets because of how they wobble their parent star…. Gilese 436 is located in our galactic backyard, 30 light-years away in the constellation Leo…. The 55 Cancri is about 5 billion years old…and is located 41 light years away in the constellation Cancer….

This is all a Blue-Plate Special of parboiled nonsense being served up by NASA’s corral of Virtual Reality Cyberpunk Kooks [See: Virtual Reality Fraud] who are blindly (or knowingly!) promoting the Kabbalic Kosmos and the g’d behind it.

For the reasons given in the first three pages–and most emphatically for the reasons given [See: Kabbala 6, Redshift Fraud, NASAs Hanky-Panky]–the world is being inundated with this genre of pure fantasy, boldly masquerading as “science” with every such claim that is put out in the media… Watch for such claims. Then grab your calculator every time you see of tens and hundreds and thousands and millions and billions of light year distances to anything in space. They are all imaginary, contra-scientific LIES, and demonstrably so!


Another update on this Disney World “science entitled: “A Shortcut for Planet Hunters” -TIME 11-25-07, p.48:

“Earlier this month, astronomers from San Francisco State University, the University of California, Berkeley, and the Carnegie Institution of Washington announced the discovery of a fifth planet around the star 55 Cancri, which is 41 light years away in the constellation Cancer. The find makes that star system the most heavily populated one known other than our sun’s and raises to 265 the total of extra solar planets since astronomers began discovering them in 1995.” With the usual blather about “liquid water can exist” and “warm enough and wet enough to get biology going”, the truth somehow crept into this article. NOTE: “…the new world is too small and distant to be spotted by telescope. Instead it was discovered by measuring the tiny wobbles its gravity imposes on the motion of its parent star….”

How much longer will the world allow these kinds of factless fantasies to go on in the name of “science and at taxpayer’s expense”??!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A Flat Earther’s View of Jeff Bezos’ Space Fight

A Flat Earther’s View of Jeff Bezos’ Space Fight

FE Corona Revelation

If you read the news, Jeff Bezo, former CEO of Amazon, and three others went into “space” aboard his capsule. This was on the anniversary of “the first Moon landing” in 1969. I think there is a hidden message here: the 1969 flight was a fake, and there were some things fake about this one, too.

The claim is that they went 66.6 miles altitude. Some papers have it at 66.5 – so the Mark of the Beast is not too obvious. So, why this exact figure? They claim that space begins at 62 miles. Oh, how convenient. So, why didn’t they go to an even 70 miles? Or anything else and just have even mileage. Well, we all know the answer.

And what did Satan want to do? Ascend above the stars.; make his seat higher than God’s.

You can be sure that they will not show any pictures out the window and IF they do, it will be with a fisheye lens – to “prove” that the Earth is curved. The three astro-nots know that it’s really flat, if they have any common sense; or maybe not and still believe that it’s a globe – being so indoctrinated.

For the weightlessness they experienced for four minutes – that was when they fell back to Earth. This would be the same simulation as when a plane takes a nose dive. So, there is nothing out of the ordinary here. This is how other astro-nots are tested.

Jeff’s brother, Mark, assumed the moniker “Astronaut Demo.” Notice how close that is to the word “demon.” All of this is by no accident.

The decent was by booster and parachutes on a nearby landing pad. Notice, that it was not miles away which they should have been if the Earth is spinning 1,000 miles per hour.

Search For Pictures

I did a image search for pictures after I typed in “Jeff Bezos space flight” and all I came up with is one lousy picture. But even that was revealing. The picture is of Blue Origin space capsule with part of the earth in the background. What it did show of the Earth there was a small section of the edge that showed a straight line, not a curved one as you would expect from liars. (I guess they are working on that in the Photoshop department 😉

Finally, who took the picture? It begs the question. You mean to say that there was another rocket that took the picture? If so, we were not told that there was a photographer in the other rocket. Also, we were not told that this is just an image. So, by implication, this is suppose to be a real picture.

Just like the first landing on the Moon, 52 years ago, that was a fake, so is this one. Yes, it might have been a real rocket, but it was just a fight to a high altitude but WITHIN our atmosphere, and they were right under the firmament (dome) of Earth.

As a last thought, why didn’t Jeff Bezos bring back pictures and videos? There should have been on-board cameras. Also, you’d think that each person would have brought their own camera. Who wouldn’t bring their own camera when you go to an historical event or see once in a life time place. The fact that there is an absence of cameras, the fact that there wasn’t a live feed, makes me doubt that they even went up?

People are really whacked out – they can’t separate Hollywood from reality. When two people are talking on the film and there are only two people, someone has to be taking the video. But do they really think about that? People must think that it’s natural, otherwise, they would question “Who is taking the picture?” The sheeple must think that there is some invisible camera floating all around us that can take picture from the side, from above, and in our privacy – that there need not be another physical camera with our without a person behind it. Otherwise, they would question all these photos of satellites deep in space with a beautifully framed picture of the planet and Sun in the background. In other words, there need not be another person and camera recording all this.

Finally, the media is in on this just as much as those giving the orders. The first question they should be asking Jeff Bezos is, “Where are the pictures? Why wasn’t there a live feed? They had the technology during the days of the Apollo Missions, why didn’t you have on-board cameras now?” (Of course, the Apollo Missions were fake, too, but I’m writing from the perspective of the media who believes everything NASA told them.)

We know the answers to all of this.

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

The Conspiracy: USA Incorporated

The Conspiracy: USA Incorporated

CI Ministries 53

Christian Identity Ministries, #53, May 1990

In this issue:

  • The Conspiracy: USA Incorporated
  • Churches and Synagogues
  • The Illusion of Freedom
  • How long will evil dominate?
  • Punish the Guilty

According to II Timothy 3.16, the Holy Bible was given to us for “doctrine, reproof, correction and instruction in righteousness.” Moses wrote, in Deuteronomy 4.6, that God gave Israel His Word to make them a wise and understanding people. And down through history we find that when Israel listened to the Word and obeyed it, she was blessed. Of course, this has been true of America in their early history. However, America has been cursed to the degree that they disobeyed God’s Laws, Statues and Judgements. And, you can say the same to the other nations of Christendom, too.

CI Ministries 53a

Find our more why we have the problems we do in this issued of Christian Identity Ministries Newsletter.

Click Here

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Fake Holiday: First Moon Landing

Fake Holiday: First Moon Landing

Today is the anniversary of the first Moon landing on 20 July, 1969. The first of many other fake landings (and everything else we have done in space).

With that in mind, here is an old article on fake Moon landing. There are many on the internet as well as videos. You can find more on this blog if you type in “moon landing” in the search bar. Go to to find a ton more.

Fake Moon Landing

One way to introduce people to the flat earth is by talking about the moon landing. You don’t start off by saying it was fake but you introduce facts that makes you friend start to question the narrative. For example, ask how Gus Grissom was able to talk on the microphone with a background noise of 140 decipals. Then introduce another fact. Of course, you can just show him this or other videos.

We know the moon landing was fake because there is no other planet out there. I had learned about the fake moon landing years before I heard about the flat earth and I’m sure you did, too, if you were investigating government lies at an earlier date. Then, when I learned about the flat earth, it makes sense that the moon landing was fake, too. Unfortunately, there are good people who are Truth Seekers that know the moon landing was fake but still believes in the heliocentric model of the universe. God willing, in time they will be open to know about the flat earth.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Falsifying the Geosynchronous Satellite Concept

Falsifying the Geosynchronous Satellite Concept

Geo-satellites 3

Click here for a PDF copy.

Inserting words such as “anti-gravity, electromagnetism, Van Allen Belt, magneto-sphere, geosynchronous satellites”, etc., into a search engine will lead one into about a year and a half of reading material. Mercifully, the conclusions vary but little from those in the five chapters relating to the geosynchronous satellite controversy I put in The Earth Is Not Moving several years ago (pp.239-264).

The question of whether certain specific satellites orbit the Earth synchronously–as they would have to be doing if the Earth is rotating–or if they are actually stationary over a non-moving Earth as they are observed to be at all times, needs to be answered. Indeed, since challenges to the Copernican Rotating Earth Model are being brought more and more into the open, that need is very real.

We can start here: Which force would be stronger when acting on the two mutually exclusive Satellite Models.? Is Gravity stronger or is Electromagnetism?

As physicist Wal Thornhill (et al) agree: “Electromagnetic forces are infinitely more powerful than gravity…” As we know, a child can test this statement with a plain magnet or an electromagnet and a coin on the ground. Gravity holds the coin on the ground, but pass the magnet over it at some appropriate height and….

When the mysteries and the facts are brought together to try to explain why there is a precise slot in the sky at 22,236 miles altitude where these satellites appear to be stationary overhead at all times (unless moved a little by ground control in an east or west direction), the resolution invariably comes down to the more fundamental question of whether the earth is rotating or not.

Since that question has long been considered settled—and especially since Einstein’s relativity rescued Copernicanism from 20 years of deep trouble it was in—little thought if any is given to whether these satellites rotate geosynchronously with a rotating earth below. There they are right in the same spot any time you look. That is an observable fact. And we all know, don’t we, that the earth rotates; so, there can be only one conclusion, namely, the satellite revolves with it, right?

Geo-satellites 1

Wrong! The only fact in that concept is that the satellite is always overhead. We know this is a fact—a scientific truth–no one challenges…

The rotating earth concept, however, is based entirely on assumptions which not only have never been observed by anyone who has ever lived, but which flatly contradict that which has always been observed by everyone who has ever lived. (Go to Assumptions for a list of seven assumptions which are upholding a rotating, orbiting earth…and Size-Structure Pt 4 for photographic evidence we can all see that tell us that the earth is stationary with everything going around every day…unless, again, we assume what we can’t see and do not know, i.e., a rotating earth…and then call that assumption “science”.)

These and other factors tend to level the playing field somewhat for any who would simply dismiss any concept of a stationary satellite hovering over a stationary earth. Add these other three quick arguments in support of a stationary earth (and hence a stationary satellite) and that playing field will do more than become level, and, will in fact tilt sharply against both a rotating earth and geosynchronous satellites:

1) For those who do not dismiss Biblical teachings outright, but are open to giving those teachings various degrees of credibility, it should be noted that the Bible plainly and repeatedly teaches that it is the sun that moves and not the earth. Hundreds of millions of people, who are a lot smarter than evolutionists think they are, stand ready to welcome evidence which confirms the Bible.

2) Recently revealed hard facts declare that the rotating, orbiting earth theory is an indispensable component of the entire Big Bang Paradigm of 15 billion years of evolutionism. Also revealed is the fact that this evolution-based “creation scenario” was written by Rabbinic “sages” over many centuries in the Kabbala, an occult “holy book” of the Pharisee Religion. Who is ready to declare this “holy book” the correct one and align themselves with the Christ-hating Pharisee religion on the creation issue?? This subject goes to the heart of all beliefs, namely: Belief in Billions of years of evolution—with or without g’d and promoted by an anti-Christ Religion disguised as “secular science”… OR belief in six days of creation by a God with an eternal plan and resources to carry out the plan.

3) Equally hard facts confirm the incredible level of high tech fraud involved in computerized manipulation of mirrors in telescopes, funny cameras, phony use of parallax and two dozen other deceptive star distance measuring techniques, virtual reality lies, misleading simulation and imaging techniques, etc. It’s all been concocted by a Theoretical Science Establishment geared to upholding and furthering the implementation of today’s Kabbalic Kosmos. In this Kosmos the Copernican Model of a rotating, orbiting earth is the Keystone that must be protected against all challenges… including very prominently this issue: Are those satellites geosynchronous or truly stationary?

Now, About Electromagnetism, etc, and Geostationary Satellites….

As mentioned, both the moving and non-moving satellite models stay overhead at the precise altitude of 22,236 miles. They basically do not stray up or down or east or west.

One thing is certain regarding both models: Some force or combination of forces which no one really understands is keeping those particular satellites–unlike thousands of others!!—overhead at all times.

From Newton till today the standard mathematics which attempt to explain all space phenomena centers on the concept of “gravity”. The apple and all else falls to the ground and this observed fact needs a name. Call it “gravity”. No problem.

But to attribute the formation of the earth and all else in the universe to gravitational forces pulling and shaping and rotating and orbiting Big Bang debris into its present mind-blowing order and function and precision is more than a bit off the wall when you think about it, isn’t it? Take one quick example, viz., the matter of tides on the earth. Here we are told that the scientific explanation is that the Moon’s weak gravity stretches the earth like a rubber ball and thus controls tides on both sides of the earth. This utterly sappy, contra-scientific nonsense has become a scientific “fact” that is in all the books. How can we have been brought to believe such pseudo-scientific balderdash?!

Well, Kabbalic “science” (“falsely so called”: I Tim. 6:20, 21) rules over the world’s “knowledge” today, that’s how. This “knowledge” must have a non-Biblical, naturalistic “explanation” for the tidal phenomena; so “gravity” got the job.

It’s the same with the geosynchronous satellite concept. “Gravity” gets the job of explaining how this could work. I submit to you that this explanation—even when coupled with centrifugal force is fundamentally incapable of sustaining this concept. There is, however, another explanation for what is going on.

But first, the alleged gravity-enabled geosynchronous model: Consider what is required to make this particular satellite geosynchronous after it is placed in this unique slot in space where it remains day in and day out for decades:

a) It must attain and maintain an exact speed of 6865 MPH throughout those decades. To be off by even 1 MPH would throw it out of pocket by over 700 miles in one month. Off 10 MPH = 7000 miles out of position in one month. This is a serious problem. No other satellites retain an unassisted, unvarying speed; why should this one??

b) It must perform a perfectly circular orbit with absolutely no apogee or perigee. This is something no other satellite has done.

c) It must stay confined top and bottom and on both sides within a small invisible circular space tunnel at all times. Breaking out of this 4-way confinement in any direction would of necessity affect the required speed and direction and hence bollix everything up…including the location where your satellite dish points.

d) The ring of geostationary satellites now over the equator has very nearly the maximum permitted number of vacancies filled, i.e., 180 at 2 degrees apart. Because of this limited capacity, the rush is on to get “virtual geostationary satellites” with orbital apogees of 13-16000 miles along certain latitudes no closer than 15 degrees N and S (so as not to interfere with the geostationary ring). These are needed in order to overcome the 2 degree limitation and to augment the amount of information traffic that can be handled through the geostationary satellites.

This technologically exciting operation employs multiple satellites in highly eccentric orbits which are arrayed so that they only power-on when in their apogee arc that is closest to the geostats…. One of the characteristics of the orbits of this new “virtual geostationary satellite” invention actually contains proof that the geosynchronous concept is wrong!

What characteristic?! This: Their orbits can be clockwise OR counter-clockwise… while all geostat orbits must be counter-clockwise to match the alleged counter-clockwise rotation of the earth.

How does that prove the geosynchronous concept is wrong?

It is noted that these “virtual geostat” constellations can make 2 and 3 and 4 orbits a day, and we find, for example, in the three-orbit-a-day model that “…each of the satellites [in the array] is enabled [turned on] near its apogee for a duration of four hours, which is 50% of its total orbit period”. It is further noted that this capability causes these “…satellites to appear to ‘hang’ in the sky because their angular velocity at or near apogee approximates the rotation rate of the earth”. (Ibid. p.5)

The point here is that this almost stationary, observable “hanging” satellite over a limited area would not be possible for those “virtual geostats” which are traveling in a clockwise orbit if the earth is rotating. This is obvious because the same observable “hanging” effect could not be produced by “virtual geostats” going in opposite directions over a rotating earth any more than the alleged counter-clockwise moving geosynchronous satellites could produce the effect of “hanging” stationary if they were to turn around and go in a clockwise orbit. (Is a stentorian Eureka! in order here?!) (This may also disprove the goofy but necessary assumption that the earth’s atmosphere turns with its alleged rotation, adjusting its speed with every inch from the equator to the poles…and unaffected by an alleged orbital speed of 67,000 MPH.)

e) The geostationary satellites have little propulsion jets on them for use now and then to get them back in place when they have moved a little bit. In the old days when one satellite conked out, they would move a good one in the direction of the bad one just far enough so that the traffic from both directions could still be handled. These were re-positionings within the circular geostationary ring that were done to maintain coverage and not to correct a problem within the ring itself. One such case involved a good satellite that was moved 675 miles. Neither it nor the bad one had gotten out of their assigned slots in the ring at 22.236 miles altitude. Both were observable overhead right where they were supposed to be at all times.

But note this: The good satellite was moved “…674.42 statute miles westward!—from 97.45 to 107.2 degrees W Longitude–over a period of 42 days at the precise speed of 16.06 MPDay.”. This maneuver was carried out based on “fixed earth” calculations according to a letter from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.[See: The Earth Is Not Moving (Part IV)]

Given the fact that this successful maneuver was predicated on a fixed earth without mentioning whether the satellite was also fixed in the calculations or whether it continued orbiting eastwardly at 6865 MPH, let us try that option and see what happens: Option #1: The earth is stopped from its alleged rotation and the good satellite and the bad one and all others continue their alleged eastwardly orbits. The propulsion jets slow the speed of the good satellite 16.06 MPDay for 42 days and when the good satellite has lost 675 miles in the 42 day slowdown it is now 675 miles closer to the bad satellite to its west and can handle its responsibilities. Perfect. The deed is done.

But wait…. There is no real model wherein the earth is fixed and the satellite orbits a stationary earth!! So, obviously, this option could not produce the required maneuver, and is ruled out. That leaves only Option #2: Again, the earth is stopped from its alleged rotation and is “fixed”. Along with the others in the ring, the good satellite is stopped in its alleged orbit and also becomes “fixed”. The propulsion jets move the now inert good satellite westward (as was actually done) at 16.06 MPDay for 42 days and it ends up 675 miles closer to the bad satellite than it was before, and the operation is complete. Perfect. The deed is done.

But wait again! This is a geocentric model!! It works and the other one doesn’t! The official admission that “a fixed earth” is required for a successful maneuver is true; but the satellite (and all the others in the ring) must also be fixed for it to work.[See: The Earth Is Not Moving (pp.260-264)]

f) Getting to the “gravity” part, we find that this weak and overworked concept is given the acid test when called upon to explain how a so-called geosynchronous satellite could do what it has to do. Think it through: Fact: There is an invisible circular ring with a circumference of some 165,000 miles around the earth which can “contain” as many as 180 satellites, all of which are at an altitude of 22.236 miles, and all of which can be observationally confirmed to be in the same place all the time.

Based on the fact that other satellites orbit the earth, it is natural—without thinking of the complications of making these geosynchronous –to jump to the conclusion that the stationary one overhead is also orbiting. Add to that knee-jerk reaction, the rule Physicists use which declares that there can be no inertia in the universe and one can see why people just accept the conclusion that the satellite is orbiting geosyn-chronously and consider the matter closed.

As already seen, what is not natural is to dogmatically insist that geosynchronous movement of the satellite is the only possible conclusion. The reason this conclusion is not truly natural is because there is not now nor has there ever been any proof that the earth is rotating on an axis. If it isn’t and we believe it isn’t after seeing the evidence, the only truly natural question that would come to mind is: What is keeping that thing up there?! But after centuries of indoctrination into the heliocentricity concept from Copernicus through Kepler, Galileo, Newton, Einstein, Sagan, etc., it has become “natural” to “know” the earth rotates and hence the satellite must be orbiting geosynchronously and that is what keeps it up there.

Five things are certain at this point: 1) The ultimate reason for insisting that these satellites are in geosynchronous orbit is based on the unproven and wholly vulnerable assumption that the earth is rotating; 2) This geosynchronous dogma is absolutely and totally sacrosanct to the entire theoretical science establishment now in control of the world’s “knowledge” [See: Knowledge Impact]; 3) If these satellites are not geosynchronous, then the earth is not rotating as the whole world has been led to believe; 4) That conclusion alone will cause the entire false science Idol to implode; 5) The Pharisee Religion’s Big Bang Paradigm of 15 Billion years of evolutionism [See: Kabbala 6]—and all the false science built on the Kabbala’s model of the Origin of the universe [See: Kab.Superstring]—will do the Humpty-Dumpty number…expressed in Biblical terms as The Fall of Babylon (Rev. 14:8; 17:14; 18: 2, 4,10; etc.).

So don’t be surprised when the hounds of hell are unleashed to prevent any serious threat to the rotating earth model, whether on this point about satellites or any other. It is a spiritual battle at bottom and it will be settled “one hour” after the GGG (Global Government Gangsters) get their briefcases open (Rev. 17:12, 14)


But there needs to be something besides the weak “gravity” concept to cause those truly stationary geostationary satellites to just “hang” up there even in the Non-moving Earth Model. But what?!

Well, one is reminded that the Bible says that God “hung the Earth on nothing” (Job 26:7). A simulation of such a non-moving Earth can be seen ( The question under the picture asks: “Could God not have engineered something like this?? That is to say, since a $50 Levitating Globe Novelty can demonstrate clearly and simply that something gravity would normally pull downward is caused to hang in space by an unseen force, we need to know if such a proven force is available. We are told and we know that such a force is available. It is called electromagnetism.

Thus, while we take into consideration that an apparently equal gravitational force of some 14.7 lbs psi covers the surface of the Earth, we also know this is not the kind of force that could play a significant role in causing a geostationary satellite to hang motionless in space at an altitude of 22,236 miles. We don’t need any occult/ Kabbalist mathematics to confirm this. We just know it!

We do not have to search very far for the only force known to man that could cause the satellite to “hang” there motionless just as well over a hundred of them are doing as we speak. Would not electromagnetic forces in perfect balance top and bottom throughout that 165,000 miles of invisible “tubing” allow the satellites to be popped into a slot anywhere along the tube and hang there essentially motionless?? Considering the miraculous design inherent in everything that exists—including gravity and electromagnetism and other things we half-way understand but could not have created—it seems that anyone who is open even to the most likely naturalist explanation–let alone a Biblical one–would say: “Yeah, a balance of electromagnetic forces could hang those satellites up there like that…just like the Levitating Globe….”

One other thing that needs to be underscored here is that…if the scientists who know about the role electromagnetism plays in the universe were able to get their findings published and aired in the other media, we would soon learn some reasonable explanations for a lot of the phenomena that is now subject only to interpretations that fit the Big Bang Paradigm from the Kabbala.

For example, those scientists say things like: “There was no Big Bang…” & “The visible universe is much smaller than we thought…. We have no idea of the extent of the universe.” & “We have direct evidence of stellar evolution but in a time scale comparable with the human life time” & “We don’t know the age of stars since the thermonuclear evolution theory does not apply to them….” & “We have no idea of the age…of the universe”…. & “Time travel is impossible….” & “Space has no extra dimensions in which to warp or where parallel universes may exist….” & “There are no neutron stars or Black Holes….” & “Gravity is an exhausted and bankrupt concept….” Etcetera. Read these in context and much more in this 5 page link: “The Electric Universe”.

So it is then, that when one puts the known facts on the table about the reality of well over a hundred high-tech satellites hanging in space around the equatorial region of the Earth at 22,236 miles altitude, it does not take long to see that this exquisite phenomenon holds the key to discovering the near-perfect flaw that must exist in the counterfeit Copernican Model. That Model is the Keystone that is holding up the Bible-destroying and Christ-destroying Kabbala-based occult physics of the Pharisee Religion [See: Keystone]. That Religion has perverted and virtually conquered modern man’s ability to know Truth by virtue of its long career masquerading as secular theoretical science.

The days of that masquerade’s success are rapidly running out….


A note on GPS Satellites:

“The GPS satellites are not in geo-stationary orbit, but instead orbit twice every time the earth orbits once. This means that for any observer the satellites appear to orbit once overhead each day.” (From: GPS Satellites: Wolfram Research)

Fact: #1 – We see and know they orbit overhead once a day.

Fact #2 – One orbit a day will produce Fact #1

Fact #3 – Two orbits are…and must be assumed because…

Fact #4 – The earth’s rotation is assumed.

Fact #5 – Unproven assumptions that are required to explain phenomena that are readily explained without the assumptions constitute false science.

Fact #6 – One orbit a day around a stationary earth produces all the known behavior of GPS Satellites.

Fact #7 – Sans contra-scientific assumptions, GPS Satellite behavior proves a non-rotating earth.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Earth’s Supposed Elliptical Orbit

The Earth’s Supposed Elliptical Orbit

The form of an ellipse is taken from the circumference of
a conic section cut obliquely, by a plane passing through
both sides of the cone, and not parallel to the circular base.
If cut parallel to the base it makes, of course, a circle, which
decreases in size as it approaches the top point of the cone.
The ellipse is something like a circle which has been more
or less flattened on opposite sides; but it is not like the
circle in having only one centre, for it has two points or foci
in the longer diameter, from which it can be constructed.
Each of these points is at an equal distance from the centre
of the figure. We are not told how the circle got flattened L
Fig. 17.

Sea Earth Globe 7

The ellipse since Kepler’s time has long been supposed
to represent the earth’s annual orbit round the sun; and
though the latest “new astronomy” has broken open
Kepler’s closed ellipse, yet astronomers keep up the fiction
of “ elliptical orbits,” rather than openly confess the great
change which has taken place in their views of planetary
motion. The great German astronomer Kepler was born in
the year 1571 A.D., and he invented and formulated his
Laws of Motion between 1609 a.d. and 1618 a.d. He taught
that the earth’s orbit was an ellipse, with the sun in “ one
of the foci, and a little over twelve millions of miles from the
earth. The other focus was left empty, and it has been
“ to let ” ever since ! Modern astronomers have lengthened
the sun’s distance by nearly a hundred millions of miles,
which has necessarily increased the earth’s supposed orbit
more than three hundred millions of miles! But this ugly
fact is not acknowledged nor permitted to detract from the
great name of Kepler, lest it might also reflect upon the
“science” of astronomy; for in this “exact science” the
alteration of millions of miles is “a mere detail!”

Sir Robert Ball, in his Story of the Heavens— and a big
story it is too!— says of this problem that Kepler “to his
immortal glory succeeded in solving and proving it to
demonstration”! The select “Royal Astronomical Society”
is evidently a Mutual Admiration Society, if nothing else!
Further on Sir Robert says that “ Kepler’s discovery
(invention?) of the true shape of the planetary orbits stands
out as one of the most conspicuous events in the history of
astronomy ” So say all of us!

Great astronomers are not always good logicians, so Sir
Robert further eulogises Kepler in these words:
“Kepler found that the movement (movements?) of the planets
could he explained by SUPPOSING that the path in which each one
moved (moves?) was (is?) an ellipse. This (supposition) in itself was
a discovery of the most commanding importance.” (Italics mine, and
parenthesis.) Story o f the Heavens, p. 110.

The above confession refutes itself; but we may point
out that the idea, belauded by Mr. Ball, is based on four
suppositions or hypotheses: (1) That the sea-earth is
globular; (2) that this sea, earth ball is a planet, or wandering
star, amongst “other” heavenly bodies; (3) that the sun
is stationary in “one of the foci and (4) that the orbit of
the earth annually round the sun makes a closed ellipse!
Assumption after assumption; and the fourth one spoiled
and quietly discarded by later astronomers, as D.V. we shall
show later on ! But let us here refer to the above diagram
(Fig. 17).

The thick line A D B E represents an ellipse all closed in;
and S the place of the sun in one of the foci of the longer
diameter. The heavier dots on the ellipse may show the
earth’s hypothetical positions for the different months of
the year. Now astronomers admit that the moon travels
round the earth once a month, while the globe is going round
the sun. What then should be the path of the moon?
Neither a circle nor an ellipse; but a series of cycloidal
curves, a sinuosity like the track of the serpent! But my
limited space demands brevity.

Look at the curve and study it, and you will find out some
curious phenomena which the moon ought to manifest if
their theories were true ; but which she, in spite of her
supposed fickleness, refuses to manifest. Trace out the path
of the moon through the various signs of the zodaic, in
relation to the sun’s fixed position. The moon would
sometimes be very slow— sometimes very swift, very— sometimes
stationary— and sometimes actually appearing retrograde!
Y e t the daily speed of the moon never varies more than
two or three degrees, and the moon’s motion is always
“ direct ” through the twelve signs— justifying the inspired
statement of the Psalmist that the moon is “the faithful
witness in the sky” (Psa. lxxxix 37).

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Supposed Circumnavigation of Earth

The Supposed Circumnavigation of Earth

Sea Earth Globe 6

Many people foolishly imagine that ships can sail in a
straight line due E. or W, ; but if a line be drawn, all round
a sphere, it would make a circle, a chalk mark round a football
for instance. A circle is not a straight line, as I once had
reason to remind an educated gentleman in a public debate.
He was known, too, as “ the Leicester astronomer!”

In the above figure the magnetic north “pole” is represented
at N ; and if a ship, sailing round the outer circumference,
keeps the point of the compass always towards N,
and steers at right-angles to it the course described will be
a circle.

A small flat island could be circumnavigated in the same
way, with a powerful magnet in the middle of the island ;
the ship thus describing a circle. But if a vessel took a
straight line course from A, it would sail in the south-westerly
direction towards S.W.

On a globe it would be impossible for the horizontal needle
always to point to the north magnetic “ pole ” from different
parts of a spherical sea, as anyone may prove by laying a
needle at various points as a tangent to a large ball. But
on a flat surface the needle always points to the centre
while the ship describes a circle— which double fact not only
again explodes the globular theory, but establishes the truth
of a plane earth and sea!

We have years ago many times pointed out this fact in
our literature, and as a result one professor has had the
honesty to make the following confession;

“The earth has been circumnavigated a great many times…
We can (we could ?) journey round the globe, sometimes travelling on
land, and sometimes on the sea. This would appear to be
a certain proof that the earth’s surface is curved. Nevertheless it has
been pointed out that circumnavigation would be possible if the earth
had A FLAT SURFACE with the north magnetic pole at its centre.
A compass needle then, would always point to the centre of the surface,
and so a ship might sail due east and west, as indicated by the compass,
and eventually return to the same point by describing a circle.” (Caps,
mine.) Prof. R.A. Gregory, F.R.A.S., Elementary Physiography’.
Yet thoughtless teachers still refer to the schoolboy proof
that circumnavigation proves the earth a globe!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Three Pole Trick

The Three Pole Trick

Sea Earth Globe 5a

We have been authoritatively assured that the curvature
of water can be proved by three poles, and a notable incident
is referred to on the Bedford Canal, Cambridgeshire.
“If three poles of exactly the same height be placed in a line, the
middle one always appears higher than the other two outer ones.
If a telescope be sighted along the first to the third pole, the
top of the middle pole will appear above the line joining the tops of
the two outer ones.” (Italics mine.) Elem. Phys., by R. A. Gregory,

The above paragraph is vague and specious. What is
meant by sighting the telescope “ along ” the first pole to
the third ? Is it. here the trick conies in ? The third pole,
being farthest off, will appear perspectively smaller ; and
the first will not be seen at all if the glass be laid “ along ”
the top of it. The telescope should be placed at some
distance away from the firs pole, when the line of sight
would be found running along the level tops of each pole.
Refer to figures 14 and 15. ‘ The line of sight from A to C
is not parallel to a line tangential at A ; but it ought to be
if there be no trick of collimation in the telescope.
But suppose pole B seems higher than C. Shift the glass
“ along ” B, and add a fourth pole at D, equally high and
distant. Now pole C “ will always ” appear higher than
pole B ; so that C is both lower and higher than B ! Which
is absurd, as Eculid says. Q.E.D.

When the noted wager was tried on the Bedford Canal,
the lens should have been turned half-way round to test
whether there was any “ trick ” in the telescope; but
J. Hampden was not sufficiently sharp. Sir A. R. Wallace
was doubtless honest, but the glass may have tricked him 1
Through a friend I sent him a challenge to shew in print
HOW the bet was won, promising to reply courteously ;
but to me he never replied. Hence of that incident we may
write R.I.P. But I retain copies of the official photographs
taken at the time, in case any other globite cares to pick up
my glove.

My friend “ Parallax ” (Dr. Rowbottam) had tried many
experiments on that canal between 1838 and 1862; and
after the bet affair he again went and carefully tested the
water for six miles, with various powerful telescopes. He
found the surface perfectly level, as before; and his
experiments have several times been pubhshed, but never
refuted. Yet, the canal is still there!
For proof “How they cook science,” see the London
Daily Chronicle, Jan. 14th, 1893.

Sea Earth Globe 5b

The above figure 15 illustrates the supposed curvature
when, as is often the case in clear weather, a great extent
of sea surface is visible looking in opposite directions, say
25 miles each way. This should give a dip of 420 feet on
each side. If the sea were globular, the curvature of its
surface ought to be plainly visible, especially from a balloon,
for a sweep of 50 miles, looking both ways; but no such
curvature has ever been seen, even for longer stretches,
but only one vast and uniform level, rising perspectively to
the eye-line. See figure 15b, and compare it with any good
sea-scape. Fig. 15a shews what ought to be seen from a
balloon (E) if the sea were globular.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Communism By The Back Door

Communism By The Back Door

Home sale 2What is happening now in the UK and the US

There is a move about to buy property by certain trillion dollar corporations who are paying 20% – 50% over market value. In the US, it is being done by Blackrock and Vanguard and it’s being done by other corporations in other countries, too.

Talking from personal experience, my wife and I are looking to buy property. When you go online and find a home, you can see what similar homes have sold for in the same neighbourhood in the past year. One of the best places to do this is What we discovered is, that some homes have sold for up too 90% more with the average price up 45% in the past year! No one pays those prices unless it’s big corporations with deep pockets.

Also, what has transpired in the UK in the past year is that there has been a huge increase in “lease hold” where you don’t own the property but only rent. In effect, these properties are taken off the market and put back on as rental property. And, you have to pay ground rent, too.

Why are these pension trust fund corporations doing this? So, they can charge you rent. With the prices they are paying, your rent will be like a mortgage and you won’t own anything. (Remember Klaus Swab saying, “You will own nothing but you will be happy.”)

apartment rent 2The government of the West have not been so bold as to say it’s illegal to own property so they do it by the back door and you pay rent.

With artificially high prices like this, many people would not be able to buy a home – especially first home buyers. When you can’t afford property it’s like not being allowed to own it.

We just looked at a property that was very reasonable and it sold in four days after it was on the market. My aunt’s home went in 2.5 hours. In these two cases they were private buyers – they were fortunate. But there are face-less corporations that are buying up homes, too. One out of seven homes in the US is bought by a corporation.

This is what I call “Communism by the backdoor,” where everyone is forced to be renters. If you have cash in the bank, two things can go wrong. 1 The money can be devalued; 2 The rent will increase astronomically and you’ll have no choice but to pay it.

With the expected currency resent coming, the money you have in the bank that would normally be used to buy a home will be used to pay the rent. You won’t be able to get out of it as the price for a home will be out of reach. If the rent goes up – which it certainly will – you’ll have to pay it, as you can’t afford to move. The other homes for rent will either be owned by the same corporation or by another one but keep in mind, they all work together.

The very latest UK news is, that another Communist law was just passed, where if you own another home, you’ll have to pay 3% of the value of the home you are selling – even if you are in the process of moving – because you own two properties at that time. It’s a form of penalty for own two properties – even if it’s for a short time. Now, you can claim this back but what is to stop the MPs from changing the law where you can’t! And, what about the hard worker who happens to own more than one property and having the other one as a holiday home or simply as a source of income?


The only solution that I see is, to move out of your so-called “leader of the free world” country to one where you really have more freedom; where you can own a home that you can afford. The money you get for your home here will go much further in a second-world country. You would have enough money left over to start a business, too. In short, if finances permit, MOVE before it’s too late.

Copyright 2021 CIC

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 3 Comments

Curvature Or Dip?

Curvature Or Dip?

In calculating the amount of curvature, or dip below the
eye-line of the observer, we have a simple rule, ignoring some
small decimal points, namely:— Square the number of miles
given as the distance, and multiply the product by eight
inches, and divide by twelve, which will give in feet the depth
of the dip from the observer’s line of sight. This is true
for a globe of 25,000 miles circumference ; thus in six miles
there would be a dip of 24 feet, and in twelve miles a dip of
96 feet.

Sea Earth Globe 4

But in calculating the depth of the dip, zetetics often have
made an unnecessary concession to the globularist, by
deducting from the distance of the object the place of the
, point where the eye-line is supposed to move downwards to
touch the earth, or the level of the water. This is a concession
to the false views of perspective given in school books, such
as we have illustrated in our Fig. 11, and to which the student
can turn. Y e t in spite of this unnecessary concession,
zetetics have shown that distant objects are often visible
when they ought to be out of sight, and a long way below
the horizon, if the sea be globular!

If we turn to the laws of true perspective, as already given,
we shall see that this deduction is not only unnecessary, but
that, moreover, the height of the observer should in strictness
be added to the amount of dip.

Let us turn to Fig. 14 to illustrate this fact. Let the
point E represent the position of the observer on the sea-level;
his line of sight would be a tangent to the sphere at
the place of observation, as shewn by the line E H, and the
dip of an object at J would be represented by the line H J.
Now raise the observer to the height of the telescope at F;
his line of sight is still a horizontal line in the direction of G,
and parallel to E H, therefore the dip from G to J is mani
festly greater than that from H to J. And this is true
whether we reckon the dip towards the centre of the globe
in the direction of G L, or at right-angles from the line of
sight G M.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 2 Comments