The Control is Greater Than You Think
Richard Craig
We know that having the people believe in a spinning globe earth with billions of planets and stars is a way to control the people. To explore this deeper, let’s go back many centuries to find out what other methods are used to control people.
If you want to take over a country, you can go to war with it. But this causes some problems – namely, that you always have to use military force and risk the lives of your own people. The people of the conquered nations will always see enemy as a distinct people.
Now, the enemy, which we’ll leave unnamed, knows this. So, starting back many centuries ago, they used religion of the host nation. By changing the religion of the people, one doctrine at a time, they were successful in doing this.
I don’t know about other religions, but I do know about Christianity, and this is where I will focus this article on.
The following are the changes made. I will not list them in order, as I don’t know if anyone can accurately say when such-and-such was doctrine in the Bible was changed, but this is not important for our research. What is, are doctrinal changes have been made.
- The Catholics did not allow their congregation to read the Bible
- That we must obey the government
- We should not judge others
- Christians should be pacifists
- Changes the text in the Bible
- God used the Big Bang and Evolution to start creation
- That God created the Universe with billions of stars and planets
And more, that I won’t get into now.
The enemy of Yahweh, God, wants to destroy His creation but first they had to take over His people first. They know that using war is a dangerous and costly way to do so. Being conniving people that they are, they had devised another method that they did this centuries ago. Back over 1,000 years ago, most people in Europe were Christian and they went to church every week. So, these children of the devil knew that if their religion was changed, they could control the people; that the people do whatever they were told to do.
So, the enemies of Christ, by whatever name they go by, had sneaked into the church, became the clergy, scholars and priests to make this change. They also bribed those who were already in such positions of power in the Catholic church and later, in the many Protestant denominations, to implement these changes.
One way to have influence of these people is to find their weaknesses. Such as a sex scandal, lewd behaviour or outright giving them money. Once something could be pinned on them, that was against Christian law, they had these scholars and priest in their pocket to do their bidding.
If you look over the above list, these are the areas you want to change in order to have willing people to follow their dictates. Let’s go over each one in a little more detail.
The Catholics did not allow their congregation to read the Bible
By not allowing people to own their own Bible and not even allowing them to read it, the priest could read only what they want them to know and give his meaning of such verses. This worked until Martin Luther came along with the Protestant Reformation which brought the Bible into Christian homes.
That we must obey the government
This is a major goal of the Anti-Christs, that we must obey the government. What the Catholic and Protestants were telling their people was a distortion of Romans 13, where we must obey Ceaser. But reading it in context, it talks about a godly government, not one of Rome or like we have today. Also, they have taught, and quite heavily in the past 100 years is, “The law was done away with. It was nailed to the cross. We are under grace.” etc. It’s too much to go into detail here but just let me say that when we read that Christ fulfilled the law, fulfilled does not mean replace. After all, in the Old Testament we are told not to murder and not to steal, yet today this is recognized. So, why hasn’t this been “done away with”? Christians don’t have an answer for this. They think that we should not obey God’s laws, but we should obey man’s laws. In effect, they are elevating man higher than God.
Books have been written on this subject and many sermons, too. For more information go to ChristianIdentityChruch.wordpress.com or ScripturesForAmerica.org, for example, to read and hear more.
We should not judge others
This is another big lie – that we should not judge others. this is something you hear in churches often, yet this is another sign of hypocrisy. These same misguided Christians turn around and elect judges; they sit on juries and this is OK. If we should not judge others, what kind of society will we have? If they read the Bible, they’ll see a book called, Judges. Before ancient Israel had a monarchy, they had a government of judges. God gave us instructions on how to judge – judge righteously, that is.
Christians should be pacifists
Christians should be pacifists. You hear this from those who should know better. They are great at quoting scripture but it’s only certain verses, and some of what they do quote, is taken out of context. To get people to be pacifists is exactly what the Anti-Christs want you to do. Even those who are not in on this conspiracy – the common criminal – loves this, as it allows them free reign. If a person is a pacifist but lives in a country that allows guns, he/she would not buy a gun to protect themselves. An invading army would love, this, too.
To illustrate more cognitive dissonant, on the one hand they would not lift a finger to defend their home but if they are told to go off to war and are given a weapon and told how to fight, they’ll do it. Go figure!
Changes in the Bible
If all this was not enough, the Satanists were busy in the 20th century in changing our Bibles. One Bible known as The Scofield Reference Bible, by jewish Cyrus I. Scofield is filled with lies. Then, there were many other versions made. The publishers claim that this was to bring it up to modern English. Which it did, but it did much more than that. They changed some words while other words were taken out. Such is the case with The Living Bible, which Billy Graham promoted. Don’t forget the Bibles used by Jehovah’s Witness and the Mormons. With The Church of Latter-day Saints (Mormon’s), that is not enough, they have another religious books, too, that they hold alongside of the Bible.
God used the Big Bang and Evolution to start creation
With the pushing of the evolution starting in the 19th century, churches who were influenced by those who have an agenda of creating a non-Christian society, started pushing evolution in their churches, saying this is how God started His creation. When the Big Bang nonsense started, this was added to the evolution fairy tail and became part of the belief of misguided Christians.
It’s human nature that a person doesn’t want to be anti-science; to be known as ignorant, so, they just incorporated this into their Christian belief.
That God created the universe with billions of stars and planets
Finally, we get to the heliocentric, spinning ball earth, with billions of stars and planets.
There are two basic camps of Christians. One who believe in all the lies that are listed at the beginning of this article; that God’s laws were done away with; that those who hate God the most are God’s chosen people, that we should pacifists, etc. Then, there is every growing number of Christians know many of the conspiracies and lies that their government tells them. They are really good Christians; people who are awake as to who really runs the world, but they haven’t yet learned about the flat stationary earth. It is these people we have to reach. It is these people who are most likely listen to God’s word.
Those who hate Christ, those who want to destroy God’s people and His creation, is pushing this globe spinning earth in a vast Universe. You can see the increase in the intensity of propaganda in the past 100 years, with putting the spinning globe on every news broadcast, with putting this in school classrooms from the kindergarten up to high school; with the TV shows and moves of the past such as, Star Trek, 2001: A Space Odyssey, etc.
The purpose is to hide God
The whole purpose is, to hide God and to get people controlled by government. Many years, the laws that we have now would be illegal. Getting us to believe that we are just a speck in the Universe; that the Universe was made without God, leaves people to believe that all the answers are found in man-made laws, statues and judgements.
The governments of the world really push this. They push it to such a degree that it becomes a state religion. If you don’t believe in one or more from the list above, you will lose friends, family members, maybe even your job. However, there is in one part of the state religion, that if you don’t believe in it, you can go to prison and or get a fine.
You may ask which one is that?
In 26 countries in Europe, if you don’t believe that 6 million jews were killed in concentration camps during WWII, you can go to prison. Sound crazy? Check it out yourself. If you believe in 4 million, “Do not pass go, do not collect $200.” You can’t have our own opinion; you can’t come to another conclusion based on your research. You’ll go to jail. Do your own research to find out for yourself.
Now, if that isn’t the core of this whole state religion, I don’t know what is. True, if you don’t go along with what the government is pushing you get socially ostracized but that is about all.
In Summery
When the government and educational system keep pushing a topic, whether it be a war that it’s in, a certain part of history, and you can’t find an alternative information, that means that they are hiding the truth from you. When you do a search on Google for the flat earth, for example, all you get is sites that are critical to it. Then you can assume that they are lying to you. If you do find real alternative information, then you can be sure that the government is lying to you.
If you do a search on all the alternative things that are called “politically correct,” and you search for a site that gives reasons for an opposite belief and you can’t find it, that should be a red flag for you; that they are hiding something. For example, we are told that we should have diversity in our society; the media, educational system and government push it. This should tell you this is like a religion to them. So, find a site that talks about the dangers of diversity. Read it, does it make sense. Then make your decision. Start connecting the dots. When you do, you’ll see why this is pushed on society.
Do your research. Don’t believe me. But don’t act like you know if all if you don’t want to take time to find out what is the truth or not.



Why a Global Flight Ban Over Russia Will Never Happen
The Hidden Importance of Russia to International Flight Routes
This is a revealing article, which you can read at the link below:
Click Here
This is not simply about domestic flights within Russia. Zelensky is talking about international flights.
Think about it. Why would Zelensky be concerned about domestic flights operating entirely within Russia? He has no control over them. Yet a letter was sent to the secretary general of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), which strongly suggests that the real issue is foreign and international flights passing through Russian airspace.
The article states that Ukrainian newspaper Zerkalo Nedeli reported that Infrastructure Minister Nikolay Kalashnik sent a letter to Juan Carlos Salazar, secretary general of the ICAO, calling for action against flights through Russian airspace.
The head of the ICAO, or any other international organization, has no direct control over Russia. So why appeal to the ICAO? Why pressure European leaders to stop flights?
The obvious implication is that international flights are still passing through Russian airspace despite the war in Ukraine.
This raises a larger question.
Flight controllers, pilots, co-pilots, and navigators understand the routes aircraft actually fly. From my perspective, these routes do not make sense according to the conventional globe model. Instead, they appear to follow routes that make much more sense on a flat-earth model.
That would also suggest that, even during wartime, there are international understandings that allow certain civilian aircraft to continue using airspace that might otherwise be considered politically or militarily restricted.
Consider an example from the war in Ukraine. There was reportedly an emergency involving a flight travelling from Hong Kong toward California that resulted in the aircraft landing in eastern Russia. I do not recall all the details, but I previously discussed the incident elsewhere. A medical emergency forced the aircraft to land in a Russian city.
Most passengers probably had no reason to think about whether their flight would pass over Russia. However, once an emergency landing became necessary, the aircraft’s location could no longer be ignored.
In my view, passengers are generally not encouraged to think too deeply about these routes because doing so might raise questions about the conventional model of the earth.
On a globe, a passenger looking at a map may assume that a flight from Southeast Asia to California should simply travel directly across the Pacific. Yet many actual routes travel far to the north before turning south again toward their destinations.
Why?
From my perspective, the explanation is simple: aircraft are following the shortest practical route across the earth, travelling through or near Russia, Alaska, and then onward toward California.
The governments of the world, including Russia and China, continue to support the conventional idea of a spinning globe. Their space programmes are part of that public presentation.
To me, this suggests an extraordinary level of international agreement. Even nations that are political or military rivals continue supporting the same basic story.
Another example is Antarctica.
Russia and China have not withdrawn from the Antarctic Treaty system or openly challenged the restrictions governing activities there. If either country truly wanted to break with the international order, it could attempt much more extensive exploration of Antarctica’s interior.
Yet they do not.
This again suggests that there are certain international agreements that nations continue to honour even when they are hostile toward one another in other areas.
Russia could also prevent foreign aircraft from crossing its territory if it wanted to. It could restrict access to aircraft from friendly countries such as China, India, or Turkey while denying access to nations supporting Ukraine.
If Russia did that, the consequences for international aviation could be significant.
Flights between Europe and China, Southeast Asia, and other parts of Asia could become considerably longer. Some aircraft might require additional fuel stops. Airlines would face greater fuel expenses, longer flight times, crew scheduling difficulties, and increased operating costs.
Those additional costs would eventually be passed on to passengers.
People would naturally begin asking questions:
Why is my flight taking so much longer?
Why is there now an additional stop?
Why has the ticket price increased so dramatically?
Why has the route suddenly changed?
Once people begin studying airline routes for themselves, some may begin questioning whether the geographical explanations they have always been given make sense.
That, I believe, is something governments would rather avoid.
The situation becomes even more complicated because of the conflict involving Iran and the wider Middle East.
If commercial airlines must avoid large areas of Middle Eastern airspace because of drones, missiles, military aircraft, or other dangers, airlines could be forced to make even greater detours.
Depending upon the circumstances, commercial aircraft might need to avoid areas involving Israel, Lebanon, Jordan, and some of the Gulf states.
That creates another problem: where would the alternative routes go?
Could aircraft travel farther west toward Egypt before turning toward India and Asia? Would that route be practical?
Could some flights be forced much farther north or even across the Atlantic toward the United Kingdom and Canada before eventually continuing toward Asia?
Such routes could involve additional stops, far longer journeys, and dramatically higher operating costs.
Some journeys that are already long could become extremely difficult and expensive.
This is why Russia’s airspace is so important.
Closing Russian airspace entirely to airlines connected with countries supporting Ukraine would create a major problem for international aviation. It would also draw enormous public attention to the routes aircraft actually use.
I suspect that many presidents, prime ministers, and chancellors in Europe do not personally know the technical details of how international flight routes are planned. They rely upon aviation authorities, advisers, pilots, navigators, and organizations such as the ICAO.
If major changes to Russian airspace suddenly forced airlines to explain radically different routes to the public, those officials might themselves begin asking questions.
That is one reason I do not believe Zelensky’s demand will succeed.
If Vladimir Putin truly wanted to retaliate against the European Union in a way that would immediately affect international travel and commerce, he could severely restrict flights over Russian territory. He could allow aircraft from friendly nations such as Turkey, India, and China while denying access to others.
Would such a move hurt European airlines and passengers?
Absolutely.
Would it disrupt international business?
Certainly.
Would it force people to pay much closer attention to the geography of international air travel?
I believe it would.
But will Putin actually do it?
I doubt it.
Despite the hostile speeches, sanctions, threats, and military conflict, there are still international systems that continue operating behind the scenes. Aviation is one of the clearest examples.
Governments may fight wars, impose sanctions, and condemn one another publicly while still cooperating in areas necessary to keep international commerce functioning.
That is why I believe Zelensky’s demand for a broad international flight ban involving Russian airspace will ultimately go nowhere.
The International Civil Aviation Organization and the governments involved may listen to the request. There may be political statements and diplomatic pressure.
But a genuine worldwide shutdown of flights through Russian airspace would create enormous complications for airlines, passengers, businesses, and governments.
For that reason, I do not believe it will happen.
Zelensky can demand it.
The political leaders can discuss it.
The ICAO can receive the letters.
But when the economic and practical consequences are considered, I believe the answer will effectively be:
No.
Mark my words. This flight ban will not happen.