Mind Control with Globe Earth

Posted on September 1, 2026 by revealed4you

The Control is Greater Than You Think

Richard Craig

We know that having the people believe in a spinning globe earth with billions of planets and stars is a way to control the people. To explore this deeper, let’s go back many centuries to find out what other methods are used to control people.

If you want to take over a country, you can go to war with it. But this causes some problems – namely, that you always have to use military force and risk the lives of your own people. The people of the conquered nations will always see enemy as a distinct people.

Now, the enemy, which we’ll leave unnamed, knows this. So, starting back many centuries ago, they used religion of the host nation. By changing the religion of the people, one doctrine at a time, they were successful in doing this.

I don’t know about other religions, but I do know about Christianity, and this is where I will focus this article on.

The following are the changes made. I will not list them in order, as I don’t know if anyone can accurately say when such-and-such was doctrine in the Bible was changed, but this is not important for our research. What is, are doctrinal changes have been made.  

  • The Catholics did not allow their congregation to read the Bible
  • That we must obey the government
  • We should not judge others
  • Christians should be pacifists
  • Changes the text in the Bible
  • God used the Big Bang and Evolution to start creation
  • That God created the Universe with billions of stars and planets

And more, that I won’t get into now.

The enemy of Yahweh, God, wants to destroy His creation but first they had to take over His people first. They know that using war is a dangerous and costly way to do so. Being conniving people that they are, they had devised another method that they did this centuries ago. Back over 1,000 years ago, most people in Europe were Christian and they went to church every week. So, these children of the devil knew that if their religion was changed, they could control the people; that the people do whatever they were told to do.

So, the enemies of Christ, by whatever name they go by, had sneaked into the church, became the clergy, scholars and priests to make this change. They also bribed those who were already in such positions of power in the Catholic church and later, in the many Protestant denominations, to implement these changes.

One way to have influence of these people is to find their weaknesses. Such as a sex scandal, lewd behaviour or outright giving them money. Once something could be pinned on them, that was against Christian law, they had these scholars and priest in their pocket to do their bidding.

If you look over the above list, these are the areas you want to change in order to have willing people to follow their dictates. Let’s go over each one in a little more detail.

The Catholics did not allow their congregation to read the Bible

By not allowing people to own their own Bible and not even allowing them to read it, the priest could read only what they want them to know and give his meaning of such verses. This worked until Martin Luther came along with the Protestant Reformation which brought the Bible into Christian homes.

That we must obey the government

This is a major goal of the Anti-Christs, that we must obey the government. What the Catholic and Protestants were telling their people was a distortion of Romans 13, where we must obey Ceaser. But reading it in context, it talks about a godly government, not one of Rome or like we have today. Also, they have taught, and quite heavily in the past 100 years is, “The law was done away with. It was nailed to the cross. We are under grace.” etc. It’s too much to go into detail here but just let me say that when we read that Christ fulfilled the law, fulfilled does not mean replace. After all, in the Old Testament we are told not to murder and not to steal, yet today this is recognized. So, why hasn’t this been “done away with”? Christians don’t have an answer for this. They think that we should not obey God’s laws, but we should obey man’s laws. In effect, they are elevating man higher than God.

Books have been written on this subject and many sermons, too. For more information go to ChristianIdentityChruch.wordpress.com or ScripturesForAmerica.org, for example, to read and hear more.

We should not judge others

This is another big lie – that we should not judge others. this is something you hear in churches often, yet this is another sign of hypocrisy. These same misguided Christians turn around and elect judges; they sit on juries and this is OK. If we should not judge others, what kind of society will we have? If they read the Bible, they’ll see a book called, Judges. Before ancient Israel had a monarchy, they had a government of judges. God gave us instructions on how to judge – judge righteously, that is.

Christians should be pacifists

Christians should be pacifists. You hear this from those who should know better. They are great at quoting scripture but it’s only certain verses, and some of what they do quote, is taken out of context. To get people to be pacifists is exactly what the Anti-Christs want you to do. Even those who are not in on this conspiracy – the common criminal – loves this, as it allows them free reign. If a person is a pacifist but lives in a country that allows guns, he/she would not buy a gun to protect themselves. An invading army would love, this, too.

To illustrate more cognitive dissonant, on the one hand they would not lift a finger to defend their home but if they are told to go off to war and are given a weapon and told how to fight, they’ll do it. Go figure!

Changes in the Bible

If all this was not enough, the Satanists were busy in the 20th century in changing our Bibles. One Bible known as The Scofield Reference Bible, by jewish Cyrus I. Scofield is filled with lies. Then, there were many other versions made. The publishers claim that this was to bring it up to modern English. Which it did, but it did much more than that. They changed some words while other words were taken out. Such is the case with The Living Bible, which Billy Graham promoted. Don’t forget the Bibles used by Jehovah’s Witness and the Mormons. With The Church of Latter-day Saints (Mormon’s), that is not enough, they have another religious books, too, that they hold alongside of the Bible.

God used the Big Bang and Evolution to start creation

With the pushing of the evolution starting in the 19th century, churches who were influenced by those who have an agenda of creating a non-Christian society, started pushing evolution in their churches, saying this is how God started His creation. When the Big Bang nonsense started, this was added to the evolution fairy tail and became part of the belief of misguided Christians.

It’s human nature that a person doesn’t want to be anti-science; to be known as ignorant, so, they just incorporated this into their Christian belief.

That God created the universe with billions of stars and planets

Finally, we get to the heliocentric, spinning ball earth, with billions of stars and planets.

There are two basic camps of Christians. One who believe in all the lies that are listed at the beginning of this article; that God’s laws were done away with; that those who hate God the most are God’s chosen people, that we should pacifists, etc. Then, there is every growing number of Christians know many of the conspiracies and lies that their government tells them. They are really good Christians; people who are awake as to who really runs the world, but they haven’t yet learned about the flat stationary earth. It is these people we have to reach. It is these people who are most likely listen to God’s word.

Those who hate Christ, those who want to destroy God’s people and His creation, is pushing this globe spinning earth in a vast Universe. You can see the increase in the intensity of propaganda in the past 100 years, with putting the spinning globe on every news broadcast, with putting this in school classrooms from the kindergarten up to high school; with the TV shows and moves of the past such as, Star Trek, 2001: A Space Odyssey, etc.

The purpose is to hide God

The whole purpose is, to hide God and to get people controlled by government. Many years, the laws that we have now would be illegal. Getting us to believe that we are just a speck in the Universe; that the Universe was made without God, leaves people to believe that all the answers are found in man-made laws, statues and judgements.

The governments of the world really push this. They push it to such a degree that it becomes a state religion. If you don’t believe in one or more from the list above, you will lose friends, family members, maybe even your job. However, there is in one part of the state religion, that if you don’t believe in it, you can go to prison and or get a fine.

You may ask which one is that?

In 26 countries in Europe, if you don’t believe that 6 million jews were killed in concentration camps during WWII, you can go to prison. Sound crazy? Check it out yourself. If you believe in 4 million, “Do not pass go, do not collect $200.” You can’t have our own opinion; you can’t come to another conclusion based on your research. You’ll go to jail. Do your own research to find out for yourself.

Now, if that isn’t the core of this whole state religion, I don’t know what is. True, if you don’t go along with what the government is pushing you get socially ostracized but that is about all.

In Summery

When the government and educational system keep pushing a topic, whether it be a war that it’s in, a certain part of history, and you can’t find an alternative information, that means that they are hiding the truth from you. When you do a search on Google for the flat earth, for example, all you get is sites that are critical to it. Then you can assume that they are lying to you. If you do find real alternative information, then you can be sure that the government is lying to you.

If you do a search on all the alternative things that are called “politically correct,” and you search for a site that gives reasons for an opposite belief and you can’t find it, that should be a red flag for you; that they are hiding something. For example, we are told that we should have diversity in our society; the media, educational system and government push it. This should tell you this is like a religion to them. So, find a site that talks about the dangers of diversity. Read it, does it make sense. Then make your decision. Start connecting the dots. When you do, you’ll see why this is pushed on society.

Do your research. Don’t believe me. But don’t act like you know if all if you don’t want to take time to find out what is the truth or not.

 

Posted in Bible and Flat Earth, Conspiracies | Tagged | Leave a comment

What’s Underneath the Earth?

Posted on September 1, 2026 by revealed4you

What’s Underneath the Earth?

What’s underneath the earth is a question that is often asked by heliocentric believers. As a flat earth, we can honestly say we don’t know. That doesn’t prove that the earth is a globe – we have a ton of evidence that proves earth is flat.

As you might have heard in other videos, the deepest hole drilled was in Russia and this was nearly 8 miles deep. Then, they came to something so hard that they could not drill through it – not even the finest made cutting tool could go through it.

As a flat earth believer, we don’t know how deep the earth is as no one has ever been down there. No one has been beyond the edge either.

What globe earthers have to get out of their mind is the phony picture that suppose to represent the flat earth that is floating in space, from a profile view, with globs of earth hanging down.

What it could be, if you were to make a guess would be the dirt, tectonic plates, metal and whatever else there is, is all contained – something like a flower pot is. Again, this is a guess. One thing we can know for sure is, that God said He hanged the earth on nothing. So, you can be sure that it is not resting on anything either. I know that it’s hard to imagine, but don’t forget we have a finite mind.

To a heliocentric believer, 8 miles down is a fraction of what they say is the diameter of the earth. So, how in the heck do they know that there is a molten core of earth? They don’t! Eight miles down is probably closer to the real depth of earth. It could be one-half; it could be the bottom container.

The other side of the earth is not the important thing. We have a ton of facts that proves that earth is flat, stationary and that there are no other suns or planets in space.

 

 

Posted in Bible and science, flat earth discussion | Tagged | Leave a comment

High School Flat Earth Class, part 1

Posted on August 31, 2026 by revealed4you

High School Flat Earth Class part 1 (of 3)

 

 

Posted in flat earth Dave, flat earth discussion, flat earth interview | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Is Donald Trump Really a Smart Businessman?

Posted on August 26, 2026 by revealed4you

Debt, Power, and the Price of Profit

By Richard Craig

Most people, when asked whether Donald Trump is a smart businessman, would probably answer yes. They would point to the skyscrapers carrying his name, the hotels, golf courses, branded products, television fame, and the casino empire he once operated. Even some of his political critics are willing to separate the businessman from the politician and say, “I may not like him politically, but he certainly knows how to make money.”

But is that reputation deserved?

A successful businessman should not be judged merely by the size of the buildings he owns, the publicity he receives, or the number of times his name appears on a sign. The more important questions are these: How was the business financed? How much debt was involved? How much control had to be surrendered to lenders? How often did creditors have to restructure the business? And how much of the apparent success depended upon borrowing enormous sums of money?

The Bible gives us a principle that applies directly to this subject: “The borrower is servant to the lender.” That principle is as relevant to a billionaire as it is to an ordinary working family.

Debt can certainly be a legitimate business tool. Nearly every major corporation borrows money at one time or another. But there is a tremendous difference between using debt carefully and becoming dependent upon it. When a business is heavily leveraged, the lender gains power. If revenues fall, interest rates rise, or economic conditions change, the borrower may suddenly find that the lender has far more influence over the future of the business than the owner does.

That is one reason Donald Trump’s business record deserves more scrutiny than it normally receives.

The Bankruptcy Question

Trump himself did not file personal bankruptcy, but a number of businesses associated with him entered Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, but losing control is losing control. Chapter 11 allows a company to continue operating while negotiating with creditors and restructuring its debts. That distinction is important, but so is the pattern.

The Trump Taj Mahal entered bankruptcy protection in 1991 after being burdened by enormous debt, including high-interest junk bonds. As part of the restructuring, Trump surrendered a significant portion of his ownership interest in exchange for more favorable repayment terms.

The following year brought additional trouble. Trump Castle Hotel & Casino and Trump Plaza Casino went through restructuring, while the Plaza Hotel in New York also struggled beneath a massive debt load. In the Plaza Hotel restructuring, lenders received a substantial ownership interest while Trump retained a title but lost much of his actual operating authority.

Years later, Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts entered bankruptcy protection in 2004 with billions of dollars in debt. Trump’s ownership position was reduced as bondholders agreed to restructure obligations.

Trump Entertainment Resorts entered bankruptcy again in 2009 after the financial crisis and declining casino revenues. Trump resigned as chairman, and his ownership position was reduced substantially.

Every business can encounter difficult times. Economic recessions happen. Markets change. Competitors emerge. A bankruptcy does not automatically prove that a businessman is incompetent.

But repeated financial restructuring raises legitimate questions about the underlying business philosophy.

A recurring problem in several of these ventures was heavy leverage. When a company borrows aggressively during good economic conditions, everything may appear successful. But when revenues begin to decline, the interest payments remain. Eventually, the company discovers that yesterday’s expansion has become today’s burden.

That is not merely a business lesson. It is a biblical one.

The borrower becomes servant to the lender.

Looking Beyond the Brand

Trump has always understood the value of branding. His greatest business asset may not have been any individual hotel or casino, but the Trump name itself.

That name came to represent luxury, wealth, success, and power. Even when particular businesses struggled, the brand remained valuable.

But branding can also create an illusion. A man can appear enormously successful because his name is everywhere while the underlying businesses may be carrying extraordinary debt.

There is a lesson here for ordinary people as well.

We live in a culture that frequently confuses appearance with prosperity. A man driving the newest luxury automobile may be buried in payments. A family living in an impressive house may be only a few missed paychecks away from serious trouble. A corporation may appear powerful while being dependent upon creditors.

Real financial strength is not measured merely by what a person controls. It must also be measured by what he owes.

Business and Politics

Trump’s movement from business into politics created another problem: the Trump brand became inseparable from Donald Trump’s political identity.

That may be good politics among supporters, but it can create serious complications for a business.

A hotel wants customers from every political party. A golf course wants members regardless of how they vote. A business normally wants the broadest possible customer base.

Once a businessman becomes one of the most politically polarizing figures in America, however, every property bearing his name becomes political whether he intends it or not.

Some customers may patronize a Trump property specifically because they support him. Others may refuse to do business with any company associated with him because they oppose him.

That creates an unusual situation. The brand may become stronger among one group of people while becoming toxic to another.

For a politician, dividing people into political camps may sometimes be an effective strategy. For a businessman trying to sell hotel rooms, golf memberships, or consumer products, deliberately narrowing the potential customer base can be far more questionable.

Politics and business do not always mix comfortably.

The Contradiction of Tariffs

There is another area where Trump’s business reputation deserves examination: tariffs.

Trump has repeatedly presented tariffs as a way to protect American manufacturing and encourage companies to produce goods in the United States. There can be legitimate arguments over when tariffs should be used and whether particular industries require protection.

But tariffs still create costs.

A tariff is generally collected from the company importing the product into the United States. The foreign manufacturer does not simply write a check to the U.S. government for the entire economic burden.

The importer pays the tariff.

The importing company then has several choices. It can absorb the additional expense and accept lower profits, attempt to negotiate a lower price from its supplier, find a different supplier, or pass some or all of the increased cost on to its customers.

In many cases, the consumer eventually pays at least part of the difference.

That creates uncertainty for businesses. If tariff rates change frequently, a company may struggle to calculate future costs. Should it place a large order today? Should it wait? Should it change suppliers? Should it raise prices? Can its customers afford those higher prices?

Businesses depend upon predictability.

The irony is that Trump, as a businessman himself, should understand that principle better than almost anyone.

Hotels, resorts, construction companies, and golf courses depend upon enormous supply chains. Furniture, electronics, building materials, machinery, appliances, fixtures, food products, textiles, and countless other items may come from foreign suppliers or contain imported components.

America is a powerful industrial nation, but it does not manufacture every product it consumes.

Therefore, sweeping or unpredictable tariffs can create difficulties even for companies owned by the people advocating them.

A businessman should understand that raising the cost of doing business usually has consequences somewhere down the line.

Who Benefits?

Government economic policy always creates winners and losers.

Policies that increase defense spending may benefit defense contractors and the companies that supply them. Technology companies may benefit from government contracts or favorable regulatory decisions. Manufacturers protected from foreign competition may benefit from tariffs, while companies dependent upon imported components may face higher costs.

That is why the relationship between political power and private business deserves constant scrutiny, regardless of who occupies the White House.

Public officials possess information and authority that ordinary investors do not have. They participate in negotiations, receive briefings, influence policy, and sometimes know about major government decisions before the general public does.

That creates an enormous ethical responsibility.

It is reasonable for citizens to demand transparency concerning the financial interests of presidents, members of Congress, senior officials, and their immediate families. But accusations of insider trading, secret enrichment, or improper financial dealings should not be treated as established fact merely because they sound plausible. Such claims require evidence.

The principle, however, remains important: no public official should use governmental authority or nonpublic information for personal financial gain.

Political office should be a public trust, not a private investment strategy.

What Is Success?

This brings us back to the original question: Is Donald Trump a smart businessman?

Perhaps the answer depends upon what we mean by “smart.”

He clearly understands publicity. He understands branding. He understands negotiation. He has repeatedly survived circumstances that would have destroyed many other businessmen. He has built a name recognized throughout the world and successfully transformed that name from a business brand into a political movement.

Those accomplishments cannot simply be dismissed.

But there is another side to the record: enormous borrowing, repeated corporate bankruptcies, surrendered equity, creditor negotiations, failed casinos, and a business brand that has become inseparably tied to one of the most divisive political figures in modern American life.

That record deserves examination rather than blind admiration.

More importantly, Christians should ask a deeper question.

Even if a man gains billions of dollars, owns buildings around the world, commands political power, and becomes known by virtually everyone on earth, what has he actually gained if he loses what is eternal?

Jesus asked:

“For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?” — Mark 8:36–37

Matthew records the same warning:

“For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?”

That question applies to Donald Trump, but it also applies to every one of us.

Money is not the final measurement of success. Buildings are not. Political power is not. Public fame is not. A man may negotiate successfully with banks, creditors, corporations, foreign governments, and political opponents, but eventually he must answer to an authority with whom there is no negotiation.

The great danger is not bankruptcy in a casino, hotel, or corporation.

The far greater danger is spiritual bankruptcy.

A man may spend his entire life building an empire only to discover that he neglected the one investment that mattered eternally.

That is the final lesson. The question is not merely whether Donald Trump is a smart businessman. The more important question is whether worldly success has become our definition of wisdom.

Christ gave us a different standard.

A man can gain the whole world and still lose everything.

 

Posted in alternative news | Tagged , | Leave a comment

What Other Lies Are We Told Concerning the Bible?

Posted on August 24, 2026 by revealed4you

What Other Lies Are We Told Concerning the Bible?

Click Here for the sermon in PDF

As a person knowing that the earth is flat, you have come to know that we are not the truth about the nature of earth from the Bible. There are over 100 verses – all pointing to a stationary contained earth.

You can go to 100 churches and you will not be told that our earth is stationary and that it has a dome called a firmament. If you bring it up, you would be laughed out of the church. So, now that you know the truth; you know that we are lied to in churches or that the pastor simply doesn’t know this, as he was not taught this in seminary school. You must ask yourself what other lies we are told concerning the Bible. Or, what other topics that the pastor honestly doesn’t know, as he was not taught.

When the pastor or priest honestly believe something that is not the truth, he naturally tells his congregation.

However, knowing that the earth is flat and stationary, you should be asking what other Bible truths are not told.

Your next question would be, “Where can I find this information out; what church can I go to; what other sources should I search for?”

Before we go on our search for other biblical truths, think of the other lies that we are told. Now, I realize that not every flat earth believer knows about other secular lies but there are many that do. There are many flat earth videos and even websites, like my own, that covers other lies. So, if you are one who thinks that everything else we are told about is the truth from the government, keep an open mind to do your research.

Now, speaking to other flat earthers, we know that there are many other important things that we’ve been lied to such as: controlled demolition of The World Trade Towers, how the pharmaceutical industry keeps us sick in order to make more money. The lies that we are told about what foods are good to eat, while really being toxic to our health. The lies about how only the central bank can create money and give value to it – thereby keeping us all in debt. And I can go on and on.

Your first question might be why they are telling us all these lies if what I say is true? The bottom line is that they are different ways in which they can control us and make the maximum profit from us while we are hear on earth. These coverups are a way to hide from us that there is a creator God who brought everything into existence.

By having us believe that there is no God, or, for others, that there is a God but He doesn’t get involved in the affairs of men; the goal of convincing the people that man is in charge. When people believe this, they are more likely to obey those in charge. In short, that we must obey man’s laws, as God does not control the affairs of men. And this is exactly what is preached in the churches – that God’s laws have been done away with; that we must follow Ceaser. That the New Testament done away with the old laws.

When evil men, many years ago, knew that they would have to get the people to believe that God’s Laws, Statues and Judgments are done away with, they knew that they would have to infiltrate the seminaries and the churches to get the people to believe otherwise. When the Christian population believes this, it makes them like obedient followers of whoever is in power. Well, such biblical teaching could not be further from the truth.

Now, it would take a book to go into detail of what it’s biblically wrong to say that God’s Laws, Statues and Judgements are no longer in force. However, you can find a ton of information from such sites as: ChristianIdentityChurch.wordpress.com, ScripturesForAmerica.org, AmericasPromiseMinistries.org and other site. You’ll have enough information here to keep you reading for several years to come. Only after you listen to a couple of sermons on this topic, you should be able “to connect the dots” to see why were not old this truth.

Yes, saying that God’s laws have been put away with is a major coverup to get the people to willing obey whatever laws they are told to obey. This is a conspiracy, if you will, that is bigger than what happened on 9-11, or the fake landing on the Moon, or saying that pharmaceutical drugs are safe to take.

I could go on and on to show you the harm it does to people who think that God’s laws have been done away with. But if you take time to look at the above websites; spend the time in study, as you did when you learn about the flat earth, you’ll come to understand that is another truth that is covered up in the Bible, you’ll understand why. There is more to come, but let’s take this one at a time. In a short while you’ll have all the pieces of the puzzle that forms this matrix that keeps us slaves.

Only with God’s help can we break out of this matrix and really be free, healthy and prosperous.

 

 

 

Rewritten

What Other Biblical Truths Have We Overlooked?

As a flat earth believer, we know that we’ve been lied to that the earth is a spinning ball. We also know that pastors and priests do not say anything about the earth being flat, stationary and having a firmament (dome). The lies could be simply by omission, ignorance. So, what other biblical truths have been covered up? Most flat earth websites and videos don’t touch on this topic, but this site (christianflatearthministry.org  ) does cover it. We are not just about the flat earth but also of other related cover ups.

Once a person begins questioning long-held assumptions about the Bible, another question naturally follows: What else have I accepted simply because I was taught to accept it? That is not a call to believe every alternative explanation that comes along. It is a call to examine what we have been taught, compare it carefully with Scripture, and determine whether our beliefs truly rest upon the Word of God.

Many Christians grow up hearing particular interpretations of Scripture without ever investigating those interpretations for themselves. They trust pastors, churches, denominations, seminaries, commentaries, and traditions. In many cases, those teachers are sincere. They are simply teaching what they themselves were taught.

But sincerity does not guarantee correctness.

A pastor may honestly believe something and still be mistaken. A congregation may repeat an interpretation for generations without stopping to ask whether the interpretation actually agrees with the text. This is one reason personal Bible study is so important. We should never surrender our responsibility to search the Scriptures merely because someone else has a title, degree, position, or reputation.

The concern raised here begins with differing interpretations of biblical cosmology. Some readers believe that numerous passages describe the earth as stationary and enclosed beneath a firmament, and they conclude that modern astronomical models contradict a straightforward reading of those passages. That interpretation is strongly disputed by other Christians, including many who understand such biblical language differently. Whatever conclusion one reaches, the larger question remains worth asking: Are we willing to examine Scripture for ourselves rather than simply assuming that the interpretation most familiar to us must be correct?

 

Do Not Confuse Tradition with Scripture

One of the easiest mistakes Christians can make is confusing what the Bible actually says with what we have always been told that it says.

There is a difference.

Jesus repeatedly confronted religious leaders who had allowed human tradition to overshadow divine revelation. Mark 7:8 records His words:

“For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men.”

That warning should humble every Christian.

A doctrine does not become biblical merely because it has been taught for hundreds of years. A belief does not become true because nearly every church in a community agrees with it. Neither does an unusual interpretation become true simply because mainstream teachers reject it. Both traditional and nontraditional claims must be tested by Scripture and, where they make claims about the physical or historical world, by reliable evidence.

Our responsibility is not to defend a religious tradition at all costs. Neither is it to embrace every contrarian claim. Our responsibility is to seek truth.

Acts 17:11 praises the Bereans because:

“They received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.”

Notice that they listened, but they also searched.

That should be our pattern.

 

Asking Questions Is Not the Same as Knowing the Answer

Once a person concludes that an authority has been wrong about one subject, there is a temptation to assume that the authority must therefore be wrong about everything. That just might be the case.

If someone discovers that a pastor, scientist, politician, historian, doctor, or teacher made one serious mistake, that discovery should encourage greater discernment. But discernment means examining each claim according to its own evidence.

We should ask questions such as:

What exactly does Scripture say?

What does the passage mean in context?

Am I reading my preferred conclusion into the text?

Is the claim supported by reliable historical or scientific evidence?

Can I distinguish between something that has been demonstrated and something that is merely suspected?

Have I listened fairly to arguments on both sides?

These questions protect us not only from establishment errors but also from alternative errors.

Look about the lies we’ve been told about September 11, pharmaceuticals, nutrition, banking, the Moon landings, and other subjects. Each claim needs to be investigated independently. If our goal really is truth, then our standard of evidence should remain consistent regardless of whether the conclusion supports or challenges our existing worldview.

 

The Greater Question: What About God’s Law?

There is, however, a theological issue that deserves serious attention regardless of one’s conclusions about those other subjects: What relationship does the Christian have to the law of God?

Many Christians have heard statements such as, “The Old Testament law has been done away with.” But such statements can be dangerously imprecise.

The New Testament certainly teaches that Christians are not justified by works of the law. Salvation is by God’s grace through faith in Jesus Christ. Ceremonial aspects of the Mosaic covenant also find their fulfillment in Christ. Yet none of that means that God’s moral character has disappeared or that good and evil are now determined solely by civil government.

Jesus said in Matthew 5:17:

“Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.”

He continued in verse 18:

“For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.”

Whatever theological distinctions we make concerning covenant, ceremony, civil administration, and moral obligation, Christians cannot simply treat God’s commandments as irrelevant.

Paul writes in Romans 7:12:

“Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.”

Those are not the words of a man who regarded God’s law as evil or meaningless.

 

Grace Does Not Make Sin Righteous

One of the great misunderstandings concerning grace is the idea that being under grace means that God’s standards of righteousness no longer matter.

Paul confronted that reasoning directly.

Romans 6:1-2 says:

“What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?”

Again, Romans 6:15 asks:

“What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? God forbid.”

Grace does not transform wickedness into righteousness. Grace saves sinners and teaches them to live differently.

Titus 2:11-12 says:

“For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men, Teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world.”

The Christian therefore cannot reason, “Because Christ saved me, God’s commandments no longer matter.”

Quite the opposite. Redemption gives us every reason to desire obedience.

Jesus said in John 14:15:

“If ye love me, keep my commandments.”

 

Must We Obey Whatever Government Commands?

Another important question concerns civil authority.

Romans 13 teaches that Christians should recognize legitimate governmental authority. First Peter likewise commands believers to honor lawful civil rulers. But the Bible never teaches that civil government possesses unlimited authority or that obedience to men takes precedence over obedience to God.

Acts 5:29 gives the governing principle:

“Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.”

The apostles were not anarchists. They did not reject government merely because they disliked being governed. But when human authorities commanded them to violate God’s command, they recognized a higher authority.

Daniel followed the same principle centuries earlier. When a royal decree prohibited prayer to anyone except the king, Daniel continued praying to God.

Daniel 6:10 tells us:

“Now when Daniel knew that the writing was signed, he went into his house; and his windows being open in his chamber toward Jerusalem, he kneeled upon his knees three times a day, and prayed, and gave thanks before his God, as he did aforetime.”

The law of the state had changed.

The law of God had not.

That distinction is vital.

Christians should not become rebellious merely for the sake of rebellion. But neither should we transform government into an idol. Caesar is not God. Presidents are not God. Courts are not God. Legislatures are not God.

Jesus said in Matthew 22:21:

“Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s.”

Notice that Christ distinguishes the two.

Caesar has a legitimate sphere.

God has the ultimate claim.

 

Corruption in Government and Churches

It is possible for governments, corporations, churches, and other institutions to lie. History provides abundant examples of corruption, propaganda, fraud, abuse of power, and concealment. Christians should therefore never believe that questioning powerful institutions is somehow unbiblical.

But there is another danger: once we become convinced that deception exists, we can begin interpreting almost everything as part of one enormous hidden scheme.

That can make us less discerning rather than more discerning.

Scripture commands us to prove things.

First Thessalonians 5:21 says:

“Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.”

That means we must test conventional claims.

It also means we must test unconventional claims.

We should not believe something merely because a government agency says it. We should not believe something merely because a popular preacher says it. But neither should we believe something merely because a video, website, author, or speaker describes it as suppressed information.

Truth does not fear investigation.

 

Search the Scriptures for Yourself

The most valuable habit we can develop is disciplined personal study.

Read whole chapters rather than isolated verses. Compare Scripture with Scripture. Study words in context. Learn why Christians disagree about difficult passages. Examine historical claims using primary sources whenever possible. Separate demonstrated facts from speculation. Pray for wisdom, and remain willing to correct your conclusions when the evidence demands it.

Second Timothy 2:15 says:

“Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.”

Notice that Paul says study.

Biblical understanding requires effort.

You should not expect a pastor to perform all your thinking for you. You should not expect a website to do it either. Listen to teachers, certainly. Read books. Compare interpretations. Investigate arguments. But continually return to the Word of God.

Isaiah 8:20 declares:

“To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.”

That should be our standard.

The goal is not simply to discover that other people have been wrong. The goal is to become people who love truth enough to examine ourselves as carefully as we examine everyone else.

There may indeed be biblical teachings that many churches neglect. There may be traditions we need to reconsider. There may be assumptions that collapse under careful study. But the answer is not suspicion for suspicion’s sake. The answer is diligent study under the authority of God’s Word.

Search the Scriptures. Ask difficult questions. Examine the evidence. Refuse to confuse popularity with truth, but also refuse to confuse controversy with truth.

Above all, seek God with humility.

Jesus said in John 8:31-32:

“If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”

True freedom begins not merely with discovering that somebody else was wrong, but with bringing our own minds, assumptions, traditions, and lives under the authority of truth.

For further research check out these websites:  ChristianIdentityChurch.wordpress.com, ScripturesForAmerica.org, AmericasPromiseMinistries.org and other site.

 

Posted in Bible and Flat Earth | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Gospel Written in the Heavens

Posted on August 17, 2026 by revealed4you

Hidden Message in the Stars

As a flat earth believer, you know that the stars are points of light in the firmament, as the Bible says, and that they are not suns of incredible size and billions of miles away. We also learn that the stars were put in the firmament to guide sailors across the seas. But is that all there are of the stars.

Even us, who know the true shape of earth, don’t realise that Holy Bible says much more about stars than what even we know. There an important message for mankind in these stars than flat earthers even know. In this article, you’ll find out what it is.

Glory of the Stars, is designed to show that the physical universe is intended to declare and display the majesty of the Creator, and that the constellations known today as the Zodiac tell the Gospel of Jesus Christ through the names that God gave to the stars. Astrologers have incorporated into the constellations a mythological system designed to control the entire world through fortune-telling, sorcery, and witchcraft. However, the Zodiac, when correctly understood, says nothing about mysterious forces influencing one’s destiny, but, on the contrary, declares the glory of God as embodied in the person, mission, work, and redemptive achievements of His only begotten Son, Jesus Christ.

Having declared that the heavens reveal God’s glory, the psalmist informs us that the heavens declare a message in a language that is understood by all peoples. Obviously, the stars as such do show forth His handiwork, but seemingly explain little about the glory of God. Then how can the stars be made to speak, and in a universal language everyone can understand? The answer is quite evident: pictures speak in all dialects. They speak a universal language understood by all peoples everywhere.

When I look into the night sky, I see more than distant points of light. I see a vast display stretching across the heavens, filled with patterns that have fascinated mankind from the earliest ages. As I studied “Glory of the Stars” by archaeologist,  E. Raymond Capt, I began considering the idea presented there that the constellations were originally understood not merely as astronomical formations, but as signs carrying a spiritual message.

The central thought begins with the familiar words of Psalm 19: “The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament showeth his handiwork.” When I consider those words, I am struck by the description of the heavens as something that declares, speaks, and reveals knowledge. The psalm goes on to describe a message extending throughout the earth, beyond the limits of any single human language.

This leads me to one of the most important ideas in the study: pictures can communicate where words cannot. Human languages differ, but a picture can cross many of those boundaries. The constellations, therefore, are presented as an ancient system of pictures through which spiritual truths could be preserved and passed from one generation to another.

 The Heavens as Signs

Genesis 1:14 says that the lights in the firmament were given “for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years.”

When I read that passage, the word signs stands out to me. A sign points beyond itself. It represents something, identifies something, or communicates something. In this interpretation, the heavenly bodies were created not only to mark time but also to serve as expressions of divine teaching.

This understanding separates the original purpose of the constellations from horoscopes and fortune-telling. The study presents astrology as a later corruption of something that originally had a very different purpose. Instead of teaching that mysterious forces in the stars control human destiny, the original celestial signs are presented as declaring the majesty of God and telling the story of redemption.

As I consider biblical descriptions of the firmament, the heavens, the sun, the moon, and the stars, as a flat-earth believer among who study these passages and connect them with their understanding of biblical cosmology. Within the subject I am examining here, my focus remains on the religious meaning assigned to the heavenly signs and the way they are connected with Scripture.

A Story Older Than Greece

The Zodiac is often associated with Greek and Roman mythology, but the material I am studying traces the constellations much farther into antiquity.

Ancient civilizations including the Chaldeans, Egyptians, Persians, Indians, and Chinese recognized similar celestial signs. Their names and individual traditions were not always identical, but recognizable similarities existed in the figures and their arrangement.

This raises an important question for me: if several ancient civilizations possessed related versions of the same celestial pictures, could they have inherited them from an earlier source?

The Book of Job becomes significant in answering that question. Job contains references to Orion, the Pleiades, and other recognizable heavenly figures. God asks Job whether he can bind the influences of the Pleiades, loose the bands of Orion, or bring forth Mazzaroth in its season. Elsewhere, Scripture describes God as numbering and naming the stars.

Psalm 147 says, “He telleth the number of the stars; he calleth them all by their names.”

When I place these passages together, I see why the names of the stars become so important to the argument. They are treated not as meaningless labels but as possible clues to the original message associated with the celestial pictures.

 A Message Preserved Before the Written Scriptures

One of the most fascinating ideas presented is that the earliest biblical patriarchs could have used the heavens to preserve the promise of redemption before the Scriptures existed in written form.

Genesis records that after the fall of mankind, God spoke of conflict between the serpent and the seed of the woman. The serpent would bruise the heel of the woman’s seed, while the seed would ultimately bruise the serpent’s head.

I see this promise as the foundation upon which the entire celestial story is built.

Adam and his immediate descendants, according to this view, possessed knowledge of God’s promise and had centuries in which to observe the heavens. By identifying prominent groups of stars and associating them with meaningful figures, they could preserve important ideas for future generations.

The stars were particularly suited for such a purpose. Generations would come and go, kingdoms would rise and fall, and human languages would change, but the heavens would remain visible.

In that sense, I can understand why the constellations are described as a celestial picture book.

The message would not depend upon paper, stone tablets, or a particular spoken language. People could look upward and see the same basic star patterns that their ancestors had seen.

According to this interpretation, the original meanings were eventually lost or distorted as mankind moved into idolatry. Nations created stories involving gods, heroes, animals, and supernatural beings. The original symbolism became surrounded by mythology, and astrology eventually replaced the earlier spiritual meaning.

Yet the ancient names and pictures remained.

 Virgo and the Promised Child

The celestial story begins with Virgo, the Virgin.

I find the symbolism associated with Virgo especially important because it immediately directs attention toward a woman and a promised child. The constellation is pictured as a woman holding a branch and an ear of grain, while ancient names connected with the figure are associated with virginity, purity, and a coming branch.

This imagery is compared with Isaiah’s prophecy: “Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and bring forth a son.”

Matthew later connects that prophecy with Emmanuel, meaning “God with us.”

Within Virgo, the ancient names of individual stars are also given significance. One is associated with “the Branch,” while another carries the idea of someone who comes or possesses dominion.

When I compare these symbols with biblical passages concerning the promised Messiah, I can see the connection being presented: the Virgin points toward the promised birth, while the Branch points toward the identity and mission of the coming Redeemer.

Virgo is accompanied by three smaller constellations that continue the story.

Coma centers attention on the child.

Centaurus presents a figure possessing two different natures, which is interpreted as representing Christ as both divine and human.

Bootes depicts a mighty figure associated with shepherding, governing, and harvesting. This is connected with biblical descriptions of Christ as the Good Shepherd and as the One who ultimately gathers and judges.

From the very beginning, therefore, I see the celestial story moving from birth to identity, mission, sacrifice, and eventual triumph.

 Libra and the Price That Must Be Paid

The next major picture is Libra, the Scales.

Here the story shifts from the identity of the promised Redeemer to the question of redemption itself.

The scales naturally bring to my mind weighing, judgment, value, and payment. Ancient names associated with Libra are interpreted as referring to a deficient price and another price that is sufficient to cover what is owed.

The symbolism is connected with mankind’s inability to provide the price required for redemption and the need for another to pay it.

The smaller constellations associated with Libra make the picture even clearer.

Crux presents the Cross.

Lupus, or the Victim, represents the sacrifice.

Corona represents the Crown.

The order is striking to me. There is a price, a cross, a victim, and then a crown. Sacrifice is followed by exaltation.

The message presented through these symbols is that redemption requires a payment that mankind cannot provide for itself. The Redeemer becomes the sacrifice, bears the suffering, and afterward receives the crown.

 Scorpio and the Ancient Conflict

When I come to Scorpio, the tone of the celestial story changes.

The Scorpion is a dangerous enemy, pictured with its tail raised to strike. Nearby is a mighty man struggling with a serpent.

The imagery immediately takes me back to Genesis and the conflict between the serpent and the seed of the woman.

Ophiuchus is shown wrestling with the serpent. The serpent reaches toward a crown while the man restrains it. One of the man’s feet appears endangered by the Scorpion, while the other participates in overcoming the enemy.

I see the same elements that appear in the biblical promise: a serpent, a wounded heel, conflict, and ultimate victory.

The constellation Hercules continues the theme. The mighty figure is portrayed overcoming dangerous creatures and standing against monstrous enemies. Ancient traditions remembered Hercules as a great hero capable of extraordinary victories.

Within this interpretation, such traditions are understood as distorted memories of something much older—the promised Coming One who would ultimately defeat evil.

 Sagittarius and the Victorious Warrior

Sagittarius presents another dramatic change.

The figure is again a centaur, but now he appears as a warrior. He carries a bow, and his arrow is aimed toward the Scorpion.

If the earlier celestial figures showed the promised child, the suffering servant, and the wounded conqueror, Sagittarius presents the victor going forth against his enemy.

I am reminded of Revelation’s picture of a rider who goes forth “conquering, and to conquer.”

Ancient names associated with Sagittarius are connected with the Archer, the Arrow, the Gracious One, the One who goes forth, and a Prince of the Earth.

The minor constellations continue the message.

Lyra, the Harp, introduces praise and rejoicing.

Ara, the Altar, represents judgment.

Draco, the Dragon, represents the ancient enemy.

The sequence once again creates a complete picture. The warrior goes forth. The enemy is defeated. Judgment comes. Praise follows.

 The Dragon and the Ancient Serpent

The image of the dragon appears throughout human history. Dragons and great serpents can be found in the mythology, art, legends, and traditions of many peoples.

What interests me in this study is the connection between that widespread image and the biblical serpent.

In Genesis, the serpent deceives mankind. In Revelation, the Dragon is identified with “that old serpent,” the Devil and Satan.

The constellation Draco is therefore interpreted as preserving the image of this ancient enemy.

The same basic conflict appears again and again throughout the celestial story. The serpent threatens. A champion appears. The champion is wounded, but the enemy is ultimately overcome.

This repeated pattern is one of the reasons the constellations are presented as parts of a single unified message rather than unrelated pictures scattered across the heavens.

 A Picture Book Across the Sky

As I bring these ideas together, I see why the heavens are described as a picture book.

The major signs and their accompanying constellations are treated like chapters. Each chapter adds another part of the story.

Virgo presents the promised seed and the virgin birth.

Libra presents the price of redemption.

Scorpio reveals the conflict with the serpent.

Sagittarius reveals the victorious conqueror.

The star names provide additional meaning, while the figures provide visible symbols. Scripture is then used as the key for interpreting them.

The result is the idea of a Gospel proclaimed before the written Word—a message preserved in pictures that could be seen by generation after generation.

When I return to Psalm 19 after considering all of this, its language takes on a deeper significance for me. The heavens “declare.” The firmament “showeth.” Day speaks to day, and night reveals knowledge to night.

I am left with the image of early mankind standing beneath the same night sky that I can see today, looking upward at a story they believed had been written into the heavens themselves.

For me, that is the central theme of the celestial story—the heavens not merely displaying creation, but declaring the glory of the Creator and pointing toward the hope of redemption.

Posted in alternative news, Bible Studies, Sun Moon Stars | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Why Everything You’re Told About a Potential War with Iran is Wrong

Posted on August 17, 2026 by revealed4you

Excuses Used to Fight Iran

The mainstream narrative surrounding Iran is a carefully constructed wall of noise. From the corporate press to the halls of Washington, we are bombarded with a singular message: Iran is a rogue nuclear threat, a violator of human rights, and a religious powder keg. These justifications are presented as moral imperatives for military intervention. However, if you strip away the propaganda and look through the lens of critical history and biblical law, these official excuses fall apart.

The truth is that the justifications for war are often a facade for deeper agendas. By examining the disconnect between rhetoric and reality, we can see that the “reasons” we are given for conflict are not just misleading—they are often absolute nonsense. Here are five provocative takeaways that challenge the standard war-path logic.

The Biblical Precedent for Peaceful Coexistence

We are told that we must fight Iran because of their “heathen” religion or different spiritual values. However, historical and biblical records prove that religious differences are never a legitimate mandate for proactive warfare. During the “golden reign” of Israel, our ancestors maintained peace even while being surrounded by idol-worshipping and heathen nations.

When King David and King Solomon sat on the throne, there was peace on every side. This wasn’t because they had invaded their neighbors to enforce religious conformity; it was because the ancestors were in obedience to God’s laws. The biblical blueprint is clear: national security is a  condition. When we do right, God will see that there is peace. Unless a nation is directly attacked or used as an instrument of divine chastisement, there is no justification for global policing.

The “Human Rights” Smokescreen

The treatment of women and the occurrence of domestic riots in Iran are frequently used as humanitarian hooks to snag public sympathy for a war. This is a historical anomaly and a blatant double standard. Throughout history, countless nations have operated under legal and religious codes regarding women and social order that were vastly different from Western norms, yet they were not bombed into submission for it.

Using “human rights” as a catalyst for regime change is a tactic as old as the world wars, used against figures like Adolf Hitler to mask deeper motivations. Differing domestic policies are not a legal or moral basis for international slaughter. To suggest that we must drop bombs to “save” a population from its own customs is a transparent excuse for interventionism.

The Geographic Irony of National Defense

There is a glaring irony in the way politicians like Donald Trump frame the “Iranian threat.” We are told we must send troops “halfway round the world” to bomb people who have never attacked us, while the same political leadership allows the very people they claim to fear to settle within our own borders.

If the Iranians—or any other group—were a genuine threat to our way of life and our security, the logical response would be to remove them from our territory. Instead, the government gives them benefits and allows them to seek change from within. The hypocrisy is clear: if Trump and the political elite truly believed these populations were a danger, they would have cleared them out of the country long ago. It’s not the Iranians that are invading formerly Christian countries; it’s those from other nations that are doing it.

The Nuclear Lie: A Tool for Control

The most frequent excuse for war is the claim that Iran is “making a bomb” or enriching uranium. But here is the hard truth that the mainstream refuses to acknowledge: there is no such thing as a nuclear bomb. This “threat” is a fictional construct designed to manipulate the public.

The belief in nuclear weapons serves specific political functions: it manufactures public support for aggressive policies, it scares young men into enlisting in the military, and it creates a “real threat” in the public mind to justify the seizure of foreign resources. If anyone should be told to destroy their supplies, it is the aggressive nations that actually go to war. The “nuclear” narrative is simply the psychological hook used to justify putting boots on the ground for the sake of robbery.

The “Real” Drivers: Banksters and the Bandit State

If religion, human rights, and “the bomb” are distractions, what is the actual motive? The evidence points to natural resources and the expansionist agenda of the bandit state of Israel.

The push for war is driven by “banksters” and the super-rich who want to steal Iran’s vast oil wealth and force a change in their economic policies for easier looting. Furthermore, the long-range plan for a “Greater Israel” is not some crackpot rumor. It is an open secret, evidenced by the government-approved military shoulder patches worn by certain Israeli units that depict a map of Israel extending far beyond its current borders. These are the “real” reasons for the drumbeat of war—the rest is just theater for the masses.

Conclusion: A Final Thought for the Reader

The justifications provided for a war with Iran—religion, human rights, and the nuclear threat—are nothing more than a series of lies intended to facilitate global theft and expansion. We are being led into conflict not for our safety, but for the profit of financial elites and the territorial ambitions of a bandit state.

When will these lies end? According to the timeline of history and divine law, “real regime change” won’t come through American military might or political posturing. It will occur when the current systems of deception are swept away. The ultimate shift will come when God sends His mighty angels to cleanse the land and establishes His heavenly Kingdom here on earth. Until that day, your only defense is to see the lies for what they are.

Posted in alternative news | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Energy Weapons Used to Create Fires

Posted on August 14, 2026 by revealed4you

Direct Energy Weapons Used to Create Fires

In the UK newspaper, the Daily Mail, 14 August, 2026, there is a front-page picture of house fires in the town of Stourbridge, UK. When you click on the image, it takes to a slide show of 64 more picture. Looking at the pictures – it’s unmistakeable that they were caused by some kind of energy weapons originating from planes. The purpose of all these fires – either natural or done by the government – is to give “evidence” that climate change has caused this. This is preconditioning the people to accept “climate change,” such as a carbon tax, and taking away of what little freedoms we have left.

Some people might say that it was done by a spark by people having a barbeque. Lol. I actually heard this as the reason. This is non-sense! Why? For several reasons.

Firstly, millions of people have barbeques and fires are not started – unless they really did something stupid. If this was the case, then why doesn’t the news media say this as the reason instead of “climate change”?

Secondly, it takes a lot more than a spark or a burning cinder to cause a fire. Landing on a roof, it would go out. What mostly happens when you have a barbeque is that any sparks go out after it rises a few feet.

Thirdly, a spark or a little cinder would need to land on something flammable. And how can all these sparks happen to land on a roof and not the ground?

Fourthly, when you look at the photos, how is it that houses separate by blocks be caught on fire without the ground and homes in-between not being caught on fire?

Fifthly, people like the Turks, have barbeques build right on the balcony of their homes or apartments. If this is a danger, it would have been noticed 100 years ago and the government would not allow this.

Then, there are other reasons such as: glass melting completely but not other metals melting; cars parked next to a burned-out house not burned. The wheels of the cars melted (metal part) the rest of the metal intact. Trees and scrubs next to homes left intact, with the exception of leaves facing the fire – due to the extreme heat. Cars parked on the road but intense fire on both sides of the road.

Many people have barbeques where the weather was higher than what it gets in the UK and for much longer periods of time without rain. Sure, they have fires but not like you have seen happening in the past couple of years, such as what happened in California and Hawaii several years ago.

I got to thinking, I would not be surprised that the government here outlaw barbeques – blaming it on someone who was careless using one. This would be another reason to control what we do and how we enjoy life. Now, a person can be used as a shill and blame the cause on him, or it could be entirely made up. The end result if the same.

But if the media says this, that means that they talk out of one side of their mouth that it was done by a careless individual; and other side of their mouth that it’s “climate change.” The end result is that the New World Order is controlling us.

The next time you read about a fire, save the pictures and examine them; if you know someone who is a fireman, ask him is if this is normal or how were fires that they remember 20 years ago.

Posted in alternative news | Tagged | 1 Comment

Nuclear Bomb Hoax by Dr Michael Palmer

Posted on August 13, 2026 by revealed4you
The Trinity Deception

Why the Isotopic Fingerprints of 1945 Don’t Match the Nuclear Narrative

The Hook: The Enemy of Knowing

“Problem belief is the enemy of knowing.” This simple, haunting observation by Dr. Michael Palmer serves as the primary barrier between modern society and the truth. We are conditioned to accept the history of 1945 as an absolute—an era-defining display of physics that changed the world. But how much of what we “know” is based on empirical data, and how much is merely a story we were told too many times to question?

In his investigation, Hiroshima Revisited, Dr. Michael Palmer—a medical doctor and former professor of biochemistry—unmasks a series of staggering inconsistencies in the official narrative of the atomic bombings. By applying a scrutinizing eye to aeronautical reports, isotopic signatures, and the Manhattan Project’s own internal documents, Palmer suggests that the atomic age may have been inaugurated not with a nuclear blast, but with a meticulously staged smoke screen.

The Visual Mismatch of Destruction

The first cracks in the narrative were observed by Alexander De Seversky, a world-renowned aeronautical engineer and Russian fighter pilot. Following the war, U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert P. Patterson commissioned De Seversky to compile an expert report on the effects of the bombings.

What De Seversky found was a physical impossibility if the “sun-like” explosion narrative were true. He observed that Hiroshima and Nagasaki showed exactly the same signs of destruction as Japanese cities that had been conventionally firebombed. Most damningly, De Seversky visited the “hypocenter”—the ground zero directly beneath the alleged detonation—and found “no signs of complete and utter destruction.” He documented residues of buildings still standing directly beneath the blast. To an engineer, this exposes a massive fraud: a nuclear weapon would have vaporized the structures at the hypocenter. Instead, the footprint was indistinguishable from the conventional incendiary raids that leveled other Japanese municipalities.

The “Smoking Gun” in the Soil

The most technical, and perhaps most irrefutable, evidence comes from the isotopic analysis of the soil. To understand Palmer’s argument, one must understand the “enrichment gap.” A nuclear bomb requires fuel highly enriched with U-235 (80% or more). A nuclear reactor uses low-enriched fuel (around 3%), leaving a high concentration of U-238.

In a reactor, neutrons are far more likely to hit U-238, which produces Plutonium. In a true fission bomb, they hit the U-235. Dr. Palmer points to the high levels of Plutonium found in Hiroshima’s soil as the “smoking gun.” This chemical signature indicates the radioactive material originated in a reactor, not a weapon. Furthermore, soil samples from the era lack any trace of highly enriched uranium.

“Even if you take soil samples from Hiroshima itself, you actually find more radioactivity left behind by those [1950s] bomb tests than by the original Hiroshima bomb.”

The amount of radioactive material present from 1945 is “exceedingly small” and “implausibly low” for a weapon that supposedly released the energy of 15,000 tons of TNT.

The Manhattan Project’s Impossible Timeline

Historical records suggest that political leaders like President Harry Truman and Secretary of War Henry Stimson were being “managed” or outright fooled by the scientists. On May 31, 1945, Arthur Compton, the physics chief of the Manhattan Project, made a stunning admission to the “Interim Committee”—a secret group of high-level officials.

Compton admitted on the record that the project had not yet succeeded in purifying plutonium and estimated the process would take at least two more years. This renders a functional plutonium bomb in August 1945 a physical impossibility. Compton further complicated the lie by claiming “uranium bombs” (plural) were already in production, despite the official history insisting only one was ever built. This logical inconsistency points to a coordinated fabrication intended to convince politicians that the atomic age had arrived before the science was actually there.

Faking the “Silent Killer” with Mustard Gas

If there was no nuclear radiation, how do we account for the “radiation sickness”? Dr. Palmer deconstructs these symptoms—hair loss, bone marrow damage, and internal bleeding—as the hallmarks of sulfur mustard (mustard gas) exposure.

Eyewitnesses reported “poison gas” and a strange “oily rain” that splattered them after the explosions. Palmer suggests that napalm was detonated high in the air within smoke clouds, causing it to rain down like “burning lava,” while an oily suspension of reactor waste was sprayed from aircraft to simulate fallout. This was likely combined with cloud seeding to create watery rain, disguising the chemical spray.

Evidence for this chemical toxicity was documented by journalist Wilfred Burchett, who snuck into Hiroshima and saw fish floating “belly up” in the rivers weeks later—a classic sign of lingering chemical agents like mustard gas, which is heavier than water and settles at the bottom. This echoes the 1943 disaster in Bari, Italy, where an American ship carrying secret mustard gas bombs was destroyed, killing servicemen with symptoms that were later mirrored in the Japanese “radiation” reports.

The Mechanics of the Mushroom Cloud

We have been conditioned to believe that a mushroom cloud equals a nuclear blast. In reality, any sufficiently large, quick-burning explosion—like TNT—creates this effect. Dr. Palmer highlights the visual “tells” in the 1945 footage: the clouds show a “red glow” and black soot.

In physics, a red glow indicates lower temperatures associated with incomplete combustion (typical of TNT). A nuclear reaction would produce a white-hot intensity similar to the sun. Furthermore, eyewitnesses described “purple smoke bombs” and colorful clouds swirling together, suggesting the use of pyrotechnic smoke bombs to create the iconic visual.

“I suspect that the very name Trinity is a wordplay on TNT… the chemical name of TNT is tri-nitro-toluene.”

Conclusion: A Higher-Minded New Era

The investigation into Hiroshima and Nagasaki demands a shift from “problem belief” to rigorous scientific scrutiny. Perhaps the most undeniable proof that the narrative is a smoke screen is the simple persistence of life. There has never been a time when plants, animals, and humans did not exist in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The idea that these cities were “sun-vaporized” and rendered uninhabitable contradicts the reality of the survivors who remained on that land.

If the foundation of the atomic age was built on a manufactured terror tale, what else in our modern history warrants a second look? Seeking the truth is the only way to ensure our understanding of the world is built on evidence rather than manufactured fear. If the history we are taught is a lie, we owe it to ourselves to look again.

Posted in alternative news | Tagged | 4 Comments

The Architecture of Absurdity

Posted on August 4, 2026 by revealed4you

5 Ways Your Worldview Might Be Collapsing on Itself

Engaging in the rigorous defense of the faith often begins with a “headache”—the intellectual strain of realizing that what we believe about the world must actually work in the world. As a philosophical apologist, my goal is not merely to offer a different opinion, but to employ a presuppositional methodology. This involves an “internal critique” of the unbeliever’s own system, performing a reductio ad absurdum to show that their position provides no place to stand.

Everyone operates on presuppositions. Like the air we breathe, we use them long before we can define them. Yet, the Bible teaches that the unbeliever is “suppressing the truth in unrighteousness.” Their worldview is not a coherent shield but a “roof” built to hide from the obvious reality of God. When we push on these hidden assumptions, the “vanity of their thinking” is exposed, leaving them intellectually helpless.

1. The “Gusto” Trap: Why Pure Hedonism Can’t Stand Indignation

Consider the neighbor who adopts the philosophy of the old beer commercial: “You only go around once in life, so grab for all the gusto you can get.” This is a worldview of pure hedonism: pleasure is the highest value, and there is no accountability after this life. If there is no God to answer to, then maximizing personal satisfaction is the only logical “good.”

However, this worldview collapses the moment the neighbor encounters someone else “grabbing the gusto” at their expense. If a corrupt policeman beats a citizen or a tyrant invades a weaker nation to satisfy his own impulses, the hedonist reacts with moral outrage. But these two views do not “comport.” To be consistent, the hedonist must abandon their indignation.

“If you really believe you should grab for all the gusto you can get, then you have to commend policemen that beat up people because they’re grabbing for all the gusto.”

By demanding an ethical standard from others while maintaining a personal philosophy of self-interest, the unbeliever proves their system is a farce. They are borrowing a moral capital they haven’t earned to condemn behavior their own worldview should commend.

2. The Blind Spot of “Seeing is Believing”

Many skeptics lean on an epistemological claim: “Seeing is believing.” They assert that knowledge is limited exclusively to what can be verified through the senses or observed scientifically. They mock the believer for following the “authority” of the Bible while they claim to follow only the facts.

This position is inherently self-refuting and ironically deistic. We must ask: “How did you come to believe the truth that knowledge is limited to what you can observe? Did you see that rule?” The statement “all knowledge is limited to observation” is not something that can be observed; it is an abstract, philosophical claim.

Furthermore, the skeptic is usually following an authority just as much as the Christian—their “bible” is simply a different book from the library. They are relying on the authority of a philosopher or a textbook to tell them that only the senses matter. If their rule is true, they have no foundation for knowing it to be true. To believe it, they must violate it.

3. The Determinism Dilemma: Why Professors Can’t Really Flunk You

In the halls of academia, “Behaviorism” is a popular fashion. It posits that humans are merely stimulus-response mechanisms, determined by environmental factors and conditioning. In this view, free will is an illusion; we are simply “playing out” our programming.

The absurdity of this view is exposed by a performative contradiction. Imagine a professor who spends a semester teaching that humans have no free will, only to catch a student cheating on the final exam. If that professor imposes a penalty or flunks the student, he has just denied his own lecture.

By punishing the student, the professor assumes the student was free to prepare and free to choose honesty. If the student was truly “determined” by conditioning to cheat, the punishment is irrational. The professor’s actions prove he doesn’t believe his own theory; he holds the student responsible because, in his heart of hearts, he knows the student is a moral agent, not a machine.

4. The Logic Paradox: Materialism vs. The Laws of Reason

The materialist claims that reality is exclusively physical—that matter is all there is. Yet, this same individual will frequently appeal to the “laws of logic” to find contradictions in the Christian faith. This is a massive metaphysical blunder.

Matter is localized and constantly changing. It exists in a specific place at a specific time. In contrast, the laws of logic are invariant, abstract, and universal. If the world is only made of physical components, where do these non-physical, universal laws come from?

“If you’re going to say the world is only made up of physical components… you can’t turn around and appeal to something not made up of matter… you can’t appeal to any kind of laws—laws of ethics or laws of logic.”

The materialist is like a man using a microphone to argue that electricity doesn’t exist. By using logic to attack faith, they are utilizing a tool that their own worldview says should not exist.

5. The “Problem of Evil” Backfire: When Outrage Proves God

The most common “tough” argument against God is the problem of evil. I recall a caller to a radio show in Los Angeles who was “livid” after serving on a jury for a horrific child molestation case. He used the sheer evil of the event to argue that a good God could not exist.

But this outrage is a presuppositional backfire. For his indignation to be more than just “sound and fury,” he must believe in an absolute, universal standard of right and wrong. In an atheist worldview, the molester was simply “grabbing the gusto” according to his own preference. Without God, the caller’s outrage is just a personal “dislike,” like a preference for one flavor of ice cream over another.

This reveals the self-deception at the heart of unbelief. Like “Mrs. Jones,” who makes endless excuses for her delinquent son “Johnny” while secretly refusing to be in a room alone with him, the atheist practices a form of “intellectual ostriching.” They know the truth—which is why they are so angry—but they suppress it to avoid judgment.

“In order for you to be just that indignant… you must first believe that there’s a god whose holy character defines right and wrong for all mankind.”

The very existence of the “Problem of Evil” proves that the atheist knows God exists; otherwise, they would have no basis to call anything “evil” in the first place.

Conclusion: The Marshmallow Core of Unbelief

We must realize that the “atheist project” is always unsuccessful. While the exterior of the skeptic appears intellectually formidable, pushing on their underlying assumptions reveals a marshmallow core of inconsistency. They are people “running from God,” attempting to build a roof over their heads to keep the light of revelation out.

They use logic to deny the source of logic; they use morality to deny the Lawgiver; they use their minds to argue they have no minds. If your own worldview were put to the test of consistency today, would it hold up? Or would it be revealed as a collection of convenient contradictions, borrowed from the very God you are trying to ignore?

Posted in commentary | Tagged , | Leave a comment