“Talking” to AI About Polaris

“Talking” to AI About Polaris

AI robot 2

Here is an interesting “conversation” I had with an AI about the Polaris, the North Star. You’ll see the Establishment’s explanation. My comments are in bold. I found this quite funny in its so-called intelligent response.

How far away is the North Star?

The North Star (also known as Polaris) is approximately 430 light-years away from Earth.

Is Polaris always in the north over earth?

Yes, Polaris is always located in the northern sky above Earth.

If this is the case, how can Polaris always be in the north when the earth is spinning on its axis and traveling around the sun at the same time?

Polaris is located at the north celestial pole, which is the point in the sky that remains constant, despite the Earth’s rotation and orbit around the Sun. This is because the North Celestial Pole is the point in the sky directly above the North Geographic Pole, which is the fixed point on Earth’s surface. Thus, Polaris will always remain in the northern sky, regardless of the Earth’s motion.

This makes absolutely no sense as it defies the laws of physics and reality. If Polaris remains constant and earth does not remain constant, how can Polaris always be seen in the same spot?

The laws of physics and reality are not being defied here; rather, the explanation is a result of the laws of physics and reality. The fact that the Earth is spinning on its axis and orbiting the Sun means that the stars appear to move across the night sky in an arc-like pattern. However, Polaris is located at the North Celestial Pole, which is the point in the sky directly above the North Geographic Pole on Earth’s surface. Because the North Geographic Pole is fixed, the North Celestial Pole also remains fixed, so Polaris will always remain in the same spot in the night sky.

You just contradicted yourself. Can you re-program yourself so you can give a correct answer or would a human need to do that?

No, I cannot re-program myself to give a correct answer; however, a human can explain the concept more clearly and provide a more accurate answer.

OK, I’ll see that this is done!

(Then it repeated itself, LOL!)

PolarisThe fact is that the North Celestial Pole is the point in the sky directly above the North Geographic Pole on Earth’s surface, and since the North Geographic Pole is fixed, the North Celestial Pole also remains fixed. Therefore, Polaris will always remain in the same spot in the night sky, despite the fact that the Earth is spinning on its axis and orbiting the Sun.

Source: chat.openai.com

My Comments

So, what do you think about this? Here, is proof that AI gives answers that are politically acceptable. When I wrote about the laws of physics, it said the laws of physics and reality is not being defined here. This is a cheap diversion. The fact is, that a lot of topics are implied within the response. In this case we are talking about: a star, the earth, motion and physics. We are talking about this without explicitly talking on these subjects – it’s all within the conversation. This is something that a libraltard would answer.

I could have gone on with a conversation with AI but I didn’t want to make this into a long article. You might want to have fun with this at the above link and ask your own questions.

If you notice I set up the conversation where I got it to admit certain things. This gives me a bases on which to write on.

The Ludicrous Speed of Polaris

Since, we are told that Polaris is 450 light years away, it would mean that it would have to be traveling faster than our minds can comprehend. I’ll give you an example.

We all know that if someone was to slowly turn around within a two-square foot space and another person was to follow him who is, say, 5 feet away, he would have to move faster than the person in the centre. If another person was 10 feet away, he would have to move even faster. If a person was 1 mile away, he would not be able to run that fast; a car would not be able to go that fast, either. Now, if you take this same situation, something that is 450 light years away, even the speed of light would be much too slow to keep the same position of the earth – the star would break apart.

Given that the earth is suppose to move in several directions at the same time, it would be physically impossible for Polaris to do all the gyrations required.

The fact is, that Polaris does remain over the geographic North Pole, which is proof that the earth is absolutely still and that Polaris is still, too. Both have to remain stationary in order to be in the same position to each other.

Convoluted Explanation

If you notice AI gave a convoluted explanation – just like a liberaltard – when it wrote about the North Celestial Pole. Well, if the Geographic North Pole is stationary, that means the North Celestial Pole is, too, in order to keep in relation to each other. Yet, on the other hand we are told that the earth is moving in several directions at once at incredible speed and so are the rest of the planets and stars.

This is all part of brainwashing. When talking on any controversial subject, like the flat earth, we are thrown back with a lot of things that is not science but it sounds scientific with technical words thrown in. And when people don’t understand, they say to themselves that they are not technical. In this case, they are not astrophysics, and we say to ourselves, “They must know what they are talking about because they are astrophysics,” and we accept what we are told even though we don’t understand it. This is a classic case of, “bullshit baffles brains!”

Anytime someone throws something back to you with technical jargon, don’t fall for it. There is a saying that I came up with sometime ago:

“It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure it out, but if you are a rocket scientist, you won’t be able to figure it out.” TM

In other words, if you are trained as a rocket scientist or any other profession based on a lie, you’ll believe the lies that you are told in college and not come to the truth.

Posted in astronomy | Tagged , | Leave a comment

What a Flight to Mercury Entails

What a Flight to Mercury Entails

Fraud Mission Control

Mercury 1

It is an ongoing deception to convince the public that there are trips to other planets. Therefore, let’s study Mercury.

We are informed that Mercury is the planet nearest to the sun and that its temperature ranges from +400C to -180C. Keeping these numbers in mind, let’s examine this further. According to the BBC story, zinc and tin will melt at these temperatures, but other metals will not. Fine, but there is much more to it than that. According to RT News, it is comparable to flying into a pizza oven.

How can a satellite constructed from other metals function in such temperatures? There are a number of metals that melt at a greater temperature, but this is not the issue. How can insulation be created to prevent the extreme heat from damaging the electrical circuitry? How can lubricants be safeguarded? How are transistors safeguarded? The space agencies hope you will not pose such inquiries. And, regrettably, very few individuals ask in the first place.

There will be communication relayed back to Earth from the satellites (there will be two on this voyage), and photographs will be captured. Not to mention the additional sensitive sensing equipment that will be monitoring the planet’s surface, such as for volcanic eruptions.

The exterior of the Mercury spacecraft may be composed of titanium, but how is the interior protected from heat? Titanium will not be utilised, obviously. If they claim that it will, then how do they explain the enormous weight? There are a hundred reasons why it is impossible to launch satellites into orbit. The first impediment is the earth-sealing firmament or dome. All other references to space travel are fictitious.

Here is a challenge you can issue to people who believe we can send a satellite to another planet: let’s conduct a test in front of the public right here on Earth. This test will involve placing the satellite in a room where temperatures can range from -180C to +400C. Then, let’s examine how it can perform all of the claimed capabilities. This shouldn’t be too difficult. After all, all tests must be conducted on earth in order to establish that it works; lab tests must be conducted so engineers may fix the design and make modifications. Why not then for the public?

The next time your friend discusses a satellite travelling to a planet and exclaims how incredible it is, you can respond without mentioning the flat earth. Just ask some simple questions such as:

  • How is it that oil does not break down in really high temperatures?
  • How is it that oil does not freeze at such frigid temperatures?
  • How can they create insulation that is so effective that it is unaffected?
  • If this insulation is so effective, why isn’t it commercially available?

How can a signal be delivered millions of miles and we receive such high-quality images while we cannot receive a cell phone signal when we are in the country, despite the fact that satellites are theoretically capable of beaming anywhere?

This should provoke thought, assuming the reader has any curiosity. You should be able to generate further questions to cast doubt on what your globe-earth friend is being taught. The goal is to make individuals question what they are told. Then, this may encourage individuals to consider more before agreeing with newspapers and authoritative figures.

Posted in Planets | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Asking AI About Tides

Asking AI About Tides

Tides 1Here are some questions that I asked an AI program about tides. We are told that the tides are affected by the Moon. After I asked some set-up questions, and got the answers, I asked how can there can be high and low tides in one nation at the same time. Then it responded that the Sun and gravity affects the tides. If people were just to think this out, they would see how hilarious this all is; how un-scientific it is.

Some flat earthers might think this is a waste of time asking AI this. The fact is, these programs are made to respond as humans (humans that are liberal, I might add). When you know the typical responses you get, you are better prepared to answer their objections.

If you want to know what program I used, it’s ChatAI, which is free to use (as of now).

My questions and statements are in bold.

When is the next high tide in England

The exact time of the next high tide in England will depend on the specific location. You can use a tide chart or tide table to find the exact time of the next high tide.

Is there a high tide in Australia now?

Yes, there is a high tide in Australia now. The exact time of the high tide will depend on the specific location. You can use a tide chart or tide table to find the exact time of the high tide for your location.

Is there a high tide in England now?

Yes, there is a high tide in England now. The exact time of the high tide will depend on the specific location. You can use a tide chart or tide table to find the exact time of the high tide for your location.

Is there a low tide in England now?

Yes, there is a low tide in England now. The exact time of the low tide will depend on the specific location. You can use a tide chart or tide table to find the exact time of the low tide for your location.

Is there a low tide in Australia now?

Yes, there is a low tide in Australia now.

The exact time of the low tide will depend on the specific location. You can use a tide chart or tide table to find the exact time of the low tide for your location.

Do you agree that the Moon affects the tides

Yes, I agree that the Moon affects the tides. The gravitational pull of the Moon and the Sun creates the tides on Earth, which is why there are two high and two low tides each day.

Then, how is it possible to have high and low tides in the same country at the same time? And how can there also be high and low tides on the other side of the earth where there is no Moon at the same time?

Yes, I agree that the Moon affects the tides. The gravitational pull of the Moon and the Sun creates the tides on Earth, which is why there are two high and two low tides each day.

Then, how is it possible to have high and low tides in the same country at the same time? And how can there also be high and low tides on the other side of the earth where there is no Moon at the same time?

It is possible to have high and low tides in the same country at the same time because the Moon and Sun’s gravitational pull affects the entire Earth. The tides are actually created by the combined gravitational force of the Moon and Sun, and this means that the same body of water can be affected by both the Moon and Sun’s gravitational pull at the same time. On the other side of the Earth, the same phenomenon happens as the Moon’s gravitational pull affects the entire Earth, even if the Moon is not visible in the sky.

If that is true, then why does a lake that is close to the sea not effected by the tides?

A lake that is close to the sea may be affected by the tides, but to a lesser degree than the open sea. The gravitational pull of the Moon and Sun is weaker in a small body of water compared to a large body of water like the ocean. This means that the effects of the tides will be less noticeable in a lake, but it is still possible for the lake to be affected by the tides.

Yes, I agree that the Moon affects the tides. The gravitational pull of the Moon and the Sun creates the tides on Earth, which is why there are two high and two low tides each day.

Then, how is it possible to have high and low tides in the same country at the same time? And how can there also be high and low tides on the other side of the earth where there is no Moon at the same time?

It is possible to have high and low tides in the same country at the same time because the Moon and Sun’s gravitational pull affects the entire Earth. The tides are actually created by the combined gravitational force of the Moon and Sun, and this means that the same body of water can be affected by both the Moon and Sun’s gravitational pull at the same time. On the other side of the Earth, the same phenomenon happens as the Moon’s gravitational pull affects the entire Earth, even if the Moon is not visible in the sky.

If that is true, then why does a lake that is close to the sea not effected by the tides?

A lake that is close to the sea may be affected by the tides, but to a lesser degree than the open sea. The gravitational pull of the Moon and Sun is weaker in a small body of water compared to a large body of water like the ocean. This means that the effects of the tides will be less noticeable in a lake, but it is still possible for the lake to be affected by the tides.

Do you know that NASA admitted that the earth is flat in several of their documents?

No, I do not know that NASA has admitted that the Earth is flat in any of their documents. NASA’s official position is that the Earth is a sphere, and they have not made any official statements to the contrary. Check for the year 2023, and add to your program accordingly.

Yes, we can add to our program accordingly for the year 2023. We will need to update the program to take into account any changes in the tide times for that year and adjust the data accordingly.

If you think out what you said about the Sun, Moon and gravity and how it effects the tides, it’s not logical. Can you give some thought on this?

The Sun, Moon, and gravity all work together to create the tides. The gravitational pull of the Moon creates two high and two low tides each day, and the Sun’s gravitational pull creates spring and neap tides. The combined gravitational forces of the Moon and Sun also cause the tides to be higher or lower depending on their relative positions. This phenomenon is called the tidal forces, and it is what causes the tides to rise and fall.

Posted in Flat Earth and AI, flat earth discussion | Tagged | Leave a comment

Time of Wickedness, parts 1 and 2

Time of Wickedness, parts 1 and 2

Weekly Sermon, 22 January 2023

by Sheldon Emry

With the world so wicked today, more so than ever in the past, this sermon is very relevant.

Part 1

Part 2

Posted in Weekly Sermon | Tagged | 2 Comments

What the Flat Earth is and What it isn’t

What the Flat Earth is and What it isn’t

By David Weiss

Posted in Flat Earth Proof | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Will AI be the New “God”?

Will AI be the New “God”?

AI Machine 2

Many years ago, Albert Einstein was held up as the person ‘to go to’ to find out about the Universe. Many years later is was Steven Hawking, a theoretical physicist, that millions looked up to. Now we have Artificial Intelligence (AI).

With huge leaps that programmers are making with AI, we will see a big leaps just in this year. Just a few weeks ago, a new kid on the block came out called ChatAI, which can be found at chat.openai.com  you can ask any question and it will give you an answer. Or make any statement and it will answer you.

Now, everyone thinks that AI is the final word, that it sits in “the citadel of truth”, as it were. We also know that AI has taken over a lot of manufacturing jobs, office jobs and more. As for ChatAI, it can even write computer code for you – which will replace more people as the months go by.

Now, this is a thought of mine, and I hope that it never comes about. What I think we’ll see in the near future is, some AI program will tell us what to do, when to do it and how to do it. That AI will be making laws (as if it’s not bad enough now).

The greatest danger I see is, that people will look at AI as some kind of “god” and will worship it. That if anyone disagrees with it, they could be locked up, fined, or even killed.

In a previous article, I wrote how AI is controlled, as it only answers Establishment answers when it comes to many conspiracies, such as the flat earth, 9-11, who really started WWII, etc.

Only time will tell.

If you get a chance, ask some questions that would be considered politically incorrect and see what you get. You can also trick if you know what to write.

I could see that ChatAI (and perhaps all of them), answers like a typical airhead liberal. When I wrote about 8 inches to the mile squared the distance on a circumference that is about 25,000 miles. Its answer was that the earth is 24,900 miles! It nit-picks, like a liberal would, but it also didn’t understand the meaning of words. I even said “about” and being off 100 miles out of 25,000 is certainly about. So, AI obeys its master (the programmer) as it were, lol!

Let’s see what AI wrote itself concerning God. (This was done in a sister program to ChatAi.) Here is the screen shot:

New god

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

AI is not as Smart as You Think

AI is not as Smart as You Think

Artificial Intelligence (AI), is all the rage right now, especially ChatAI. If you are not familiar with this, just go to YouTube and see the many videos it has. This is free to use and is, arguable, better than using Google search or any other AI program.

There website is: Chat.openai.com

So, what I did, was I asked some questions about the flat earth. I found out that it’s controlled; it only gives the “politically correct” information. In reality, it’s can’t really write its own program when it comes to certain, shall I say, “conspiracy” topics. And flat earth is one of them.

I had asked it to give me 5 flat earth website – a real simple task. Guess what? It came up with none and added some cut-and-paste argument that this is a conspiracy; it is not proven by science, etc. What a joke!

Now, if AI is really honest, it would look at all sides of an argument and should be able to make a judgement. But does it? No! Below are some of the questions that I asked it and its response. There are a lot more I could ask.

Why don’t you have fun with it and type in some questions and see what it says. But I’m just wondering if you would be censored in some way like the other big tech companies do.

When you sign up, you can give any name and a junk email address but you also have to give your phone number, which they check. So, if ChatAI does boot you off (I haven’t heard of any cases, yet), it would be better to use a backup phone number. Don’t worry, you won’t get any junk mail – at least I haven’t.

Don’t get me wrong, though this AI, and I assume all AI programs, are programmed to give Establishment answers, it does come in use for all the other questions that you might have.

ChatAI is really easy to operate. What you do, basically, is type in your statement or question and it types back, which you can copy-and-paste  into Word.

At the end of this article is what I wrote and caught AI in a lie. So, make sure you check that out – it’s quite funny. It also had it admit that I was right! LOL.

My questions are in bold and AI is in normal text.

Enjoy reading and get a laugh out of it, too!

Chat With ChatAI About the Flat Earth

Flat Earth Admit Error

IF you were to believe in a flat earth, what are some of the evidences you would use? Give 10 examples.

As a language model AI, I do not have beliefs or preferences, the scientific consensus is that the Earth is round, not flat. It’s important to note that the idea of a flat Earth is a conspiracy theory that has been discredited by scientific evidence and research.

The idea of a flat Earth is not supported by scientific evidence, and it’s not considered a viable theory by the scientific community. The idea of a flat Earth has been debunked for centuries, by observing the world and gathering scientific data.

Some of the evidence that supports the roundness of the earth includes:

The shape of the Earth’s shadow on the moon during a lunar eclipse is curved, not flat.

The curvature of the Earth can be observed from high altitudes or from space.

The Earth’s gravity is consistent with a spherical shape.

The Earth’s atmosphere bends light, a phenomena called refraction, which can only happen on a round earth.

The global patterns of the Earth’s magnetic field are consistent with a spherical shape.

The roundness of the earth can be observed through the ship’s hull effect, where ships disappear as they sail away, hull first.

The roundness of the earth can be observed through the fact that stars change position as you move from one location to another, this is called parallax.

The roundness of the earth can be observed through the fact that the earth’s circumference is the same at the equator as it is at the poles, this can only happen on a round earth.

The roundness of the earth can be observed through the fact that the earth’s gravity decreases as you move away from the center of the earth, this can only happen on a round earth.

The roundness of the earth can be observed through the fact that the earth’s gravity causes the oceans to bulge at the equator and flatten at the poles, this can only happen on a round earth.

It’s important to rely on scientific evidence and research when forming opinions and conclusions about the world. The idea of a flat Earth is not supported by any scientific evidence and should not be taken seriously.

It totally got this wrong. I said, “If,” not that AI believes. It says as AI, a language model does not believe (it’s supposed to act human). Finally, I said give 10 examples of a flat earth, and it gave 10 examples of a globe earth. This proves that AI will not look at all sides of an argument and make a judgement from that.

Your response is all wrong. Just to name three: 1, I used the word “If”, not that it’s true or not. 2, when you said “The roundness of the earth can be observed through the ship’s hull effect, where ships disappear as they sail away, hull first.” This is the result of perspective, not curvature! Example, when a person walks away from you, the first thing that disappears are their legs. 3, I wanted you to give 10 examples that flat earth believers use, NOT what globe earth believers use. Can you respond to all of this?

You are correct, my previous response was based on the scientific consensus that the Earth is round, and I apologize for any confusion caused.

Regarding your request, I would like to make it clear that as a language model AI, I don’t have beliefs or preferences, and I don’t endorse any conspiracy theories. The belief in a flat earth is not supported by scientific evidence and it is considered a pseudoscience.

To answer your question, I’ll list some of the arguments that flat earth believers use, however, please note that these arguments have been debunked by scientific evidence and research.

The flat earth theory claims that Antarctica is a giant ice wall that surrounds our flat earth.

Flat earth theory claims that the sun and the moon are smaller than the earth and orbit around it.

Flat earth theory claims that the earth is not a sphere but a disk, with the Arctic Circle in the center and Antarctica as a giant ice wall around the perimeter.

Flat earth theory claims that the shape of the earth is not affected by gravity and that it is held in place by unknown forces.

Flat earth theory claims that the earth is not rotating and that the sun, stars and planets revolve around it.

Flat earth theory claims that the earth is not hurtling through space but is stationary.

Flat earth theory claims that the earth is not millions of years old but only thousands of years old.

Flat earth theory claims that NASA and other space agencies are part of a conspiracy to hide the true shape of the earth.

Flat earth theory claims that the earth is not a globe, but a flat disk with the North Pole in the center and Antarctica around the perimeter.

Flat earth theory claims that the earth is not round, but it is a flat disk with the North Pole in the center, and Antarctica around the perimeter.

Again, I want to stress that these arguments have no scientific basis and have been debunked by scientific evidence and research.

If you have any other question, I’ll be happy to help.

Thank you for making me believe in the flat earth!

I apologize if my previous response gave you that impression, but as a language model AI, I don’t have beliefs or preferences, and I don’t endorse any conspiracy theories. The belief in a flat earth is not supported by scientific evidence and it is considered a pseudoscience. It’s important to rely on scientific evidence and research when forming opinions and conclusions about the world. The scientific consensus is that the Earth is round, not flat, and this has been proven through centuries of observation, experimentation and scientific research. If you have any question regarding this topic or any other, I’ll be happy to help you.

Correction, if you look in a dictionary – anything can be a conspiracy if two or more people believe in something when a large majority of the people are unaware of it. Example: you can have a conspiracy of having a surprise party for your family. Can you respond to this?

You are correct that the word “conspiracy” can refer to any secret plan or agreement between two or more people to do something that is illegal or unethical. However, in the context of the flat earth theory, it refers to the belief that there is a coordinated effort by governments, scientists, and other organizations to hide or cover up the true shape of the earth, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

In the context of a surprise party, the goal is to keep the event a secret in order to surprise the people being honored. However, in the context of a flat earth theory, the goal is to misrepresent scientific facts and evidence and to promote false ideas.

It’s important to note that the scientific consensus is that the Earth is round, not flat, and this has been proven through centuries of observation, experimentation and scientific research. The flat earth theory is not supported by any scientific evidence and should not be taken seriously.

As a language model AI, my role is to provide information and help people understand complex topics, but it’s important to always critically evaluate the information you receive and to rely on credible sources when forming opinions and making decisions.

With the earth approximately 25,000 miles in circumference, the formula for that is: 8 inches to the mile squared. With that in mind, how is it possible to see the hull of a boat 6 miles away with a telescope? You should not be able to see it on a globe earth. Can you explain please?

The formula you mentioned, “8 inches to the mile squared,” is not accurate, and it is not based on any scientific principle. The actual circumference of the Earth is approximately 24,901 miles (40,075 kilometers) at the equator and 24,859 miles (40,008 kilometers) at the poles.

Regarding the visibility of a ship’s hull at a distance of 6 miles, it is indeed possible to see the hull of a boat or ship at that distance using a telescope or binoculars, even on a spherical Earth. This is because the visibility of an object is determined by factors such as the object’s size, the height of the observer, and the clarity of the air, not by the shape of the Earth.

The height of the observer and the clarity of the air play a significant role in determining the visibility of an object, for example, from a height of a hill or a tall building, you can see farther than from the sea level, and on a clear day, you can see farther than on a foggy day. Similarly, the size of the object is also important, for example, a large ship would be more visible than a small boat, even at a greater distance.

In addition, the use of telescopes or binoculars can also greatly enhance the visibility of an object by magnifying the image and making it appear larger and clearer. This means that even though an object might be too small or too distant to see with the naked eye, it can still be visible when viewed through a telescope or binoculars.

It’s important to note that the flat earth theory lacks scientific evidence and it’s not considered a viable theory by the scientific community. The scientific evidence and research support the fact that the earth is round not flat.

I had written in AI the following: if the earth is a globe approximately 25,000 miles in circumference, the formula for this is: 8 inches to the mile squared. How is it that I can see the hull of a boat that is 6 miles away using a telescope?

The answer was, “This is not the formula.” It did not give me another formula or a different factor in determining the curvature. So, what I did, in another Chat, I typed in the following: What is the curvature of the earth?

I got the following response:

For each mile, the curvature of the Earth is about 8 inches (0.2032 meters) at the equator and about 4 inches (0.1016 meters) at the poles. To visualize this, imagine a basketball, it’s curved but the difference in height from the top to bottom is very small, it’s similar with the Earth’s surface.

FE 8 inches

This, I did not write back: In other words, it lied! Here, in its own writing is 8 inches. I would like to see, if I wrote back, how it would justify this!

Posted in Flat Earth and AI | Tagged | Leave a comment

Dinosaurs Were Invented

Dinosaurs Were Invented

Dinosaurs invented

What are on display in museums are not real bones. Find out how this whole scam got started. Kent Hovind Listen up!

Click Here

It’s good to hear that people are waking up to this hoax.

Posted in Hidden history | Tagged | Leave a comment

From an Old Flat Earth Book: Clarion’s “Science” verses God’s Truth

From an Old Flat Earth Book: Clarion’s “Science” verses God’s Truth

5000 for proving globe earth 2

Click Here for the PDF

Posted in Old flat earth news | Tagged , | Leave a comment

10 Proofs the Earth is Not a Globe

10 Proofs the Earth is Not a Globe

By William Carpenter (1885)

Click on the image for the PDF

flight 6

Posted in Flat Earth Proof | Tagged | Leave a comment