AI Throws Out Nonsense to Simple Questions About the Flat Earth

AI Throws Out Nonsense to Simple Questions About the Flat Earth

Nothing new here, but I thought you’d be interested in reading this. This would be a typical response to someone who is completely brainwashed by the media. But at least AI doesn’t get nasty!

My comments are in bold

Using Spherical trigonometry, what is the drop-off of every mile at the equator?

Spherical trigonometry deals with the relationships between angles and distances in three-dimensional space. The drop-off of every mile at the equator can’t be determined solely using spherical trigonometry as it depends on the elevation of the starting point, the slope of the terrain, and other factors that aren’t related to spherical trigonometry.

Spherical trigonometry can be used to calculate angles and distances on the surface of a sphere, such as the Earth. For example, it can be used to determine the great-circle distance between two points on the Earth’s surface or to calculate the altitude of a celestial body above the horizon. However, it doesn’t provide information about changes in elevation or drop-off over a specific distance.

Say the starting point is at sea level, what is the drop-off?

If the starting point is at sea level, then there is no drop-off. At sea level, the elevation is constant and there is no change in height. The concept of drop-off implies a change in elevation or height over a certain distance, so a starting point at sea level would not result in a drop-off.

Say it’s at 1,000 feet altitude

I apologize, but the concept of “drop-off” is not applicable in this scenario. The Earth’s surface is curved, and the change in elevation over a given distance at a constant altitude of 1,000 feet would be a result of the curvature of the Earth’s surface, not a drop-off. To accurately calculate the change in elevation over a given distance, detailed topographical information would be needed, along with additional calculations taking into account the Earth’s curvature.

What is the curvature over a distance of 10 miles?

The Earth’s surface is a sphere, and its curvature can be calculated using mathematical formulas. The amount of curvature over a distance of 10 miles will depend on the latitude of the starting point. At the equator, the Earth’s circumference is greatest, and the curvature is greatest. The closer you are to the poles, the smaller the Earth’s circumference, and the smaller the curvature.

To give a general idea, the Earth’s circumference at the equator is approximately 24,901 miles. Therefore, over a distance of 10 miles, the drop in elevation due to the Earth’s curvature is very small and would not be noticeable to the naked eye. A more precise calculation of the Earth’s curvature over a specific distance would require more detailed information and a series of complex calculations.

How far does a boat at sea has to be before it’s behind the curve, assuming the boat is 10 feet high?

The distance at which a boat would be behind the curve of the Earth’s surface depends on the height of the boat above the water and the latitude of the boat. The concept of “behind the curve” is often used to describe the point at which the curvature of the Earth’s surface causes the bottom of an object to no longer be visible from a observer’s perspective.

In general, the farther the observer is from the object, the more the Earth’s curvature will come into play, causing the bottom of the object to disappear from view. However, determining the exact distance at which this would occur is not a simple task and would require a detailed calculation taking into account the height of the boat, the observer’s height above sea level, and the latitude of the boat.

As a rough estimate, the Earth’s curvature causes an object to disappear from view if it is about 8 inches lower in the horizon for every mile it is away from the observer. Based on this, a 10-foot high boat would disappear from view when it is approximately 5 miles away from an observer at sea level. However, this is just a rough estimate and the actual distance at which the boat would disappear from view could be different, depending on the observer’s height and the latitude of the boat.

To comment on what you said, “The ability of a telescope to see a distant object, such as a boat, is not affected by the water in between the observer and the object.” ANY object, including water, does effect what you see. If I’m looking at you at 10 feet away, I can see you, but if a wall was put in between us, then I would NOT be able to see you.

As for the second comment I would like to make, you said, “This increased size makes it possible to see object that would otherwise be obscured to the Earth’s curvature.” May I inform you that a telescope and only see in a STRAIGHT LINE, not behind a curve, no matter how powerful the telescope is!

Do you know that your answer does not make sense to a human. I think a more intelligent human needs to program you!

What this means is, that the earth is flat! For, with a powerful enough telescope on a clear day and calm sea, I can see a 100 foot tall building 20 miles away.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Government Wants to Hack Your Brains

The Government Wants to Hack Your Brains

They probably would like to know why you are a flat earther – perhaps to get you to change your mind.

At a recent World Economic Forum (WEF) presentation, those in attendance heard that work was already well under way to figure out how the human brain works. Tim Hinchcliffe, who has been warning about the WEF’s plans for years, pointed out that the presentation happened five years after historian Yuval Noah Harari told people in Davos that humans could be completely hacked. The academic says that we are, in a nutshell, walking, breathing, living algorithms. At the time, Harari’s vision seemed like a feverish dream. But now, this dream is quickly becoming a reality.

Nicholas Thompson, the CEO of The Atlantic, led a session called “Ready for Brain Transparency?” at the WEF Annual Meeting 2023. The meeting started with a video based on George Orwell’s 1984 that showed a situation in which employees’ brainwaves were being tracked and decoded. In addition to using the information to judge how well employees did their jobs, brainwaves were decoded to see if anyone had done anything illegal.

After the video, Nita Farahany of Duke University, who is an expert on the ethical and legal implications of new technologies, told the audience that there are already ways to decode brainwaves. She said that powerful organisations and governments can already use certain technologies to “pick up and decode faces that you’re seeing in your mind, like simple shapes, numbers, or your PIN number for your bank account.”

“Artificial intelligence,” she said next, “has made it possible for brain activity to be decoded in ways we never thought possible before.” Farahany said that all of our thoughts and feelings are just bits of data, and that artificial intelligence can be used to figure out what they mean (AI). The devices used to decode this “data” don’t have to be as invasive as Elon Musk’s neural implants, which is what most people think. Farahany says that the devices being used are more like Fitbits for the brain. “We’re not talking about implanted devices of the future; I’m talking about wearable devices that are like Fitbits for your brain,” she said in a rather cheery tone.

Farahany gave her presentation on the same day that NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg was in Davos. Stoltenberg probably knows a lot about brain hacking, just like Farahany. In 2021, NATO ran a meeting to talk about “weaponizing brain sciences” and “exploiting the weaknesses of the human brain.” Project Censored, an organisation that promotes investigative journalism, better media literacy, and critical thinking, said that the forum was made to look into “more sophisticated forms of social engineering and control.” This is why NATO has added a sixth level, the cognitive domain, to its five operational domains (air, land, sea, space, and cyber), two years after the forum.

Experts from Johns Hopkins University and Imperial College London talk about the many ways the mind should be seen as a battlefield in an article that NATO has approved. They pointed out that cognitive warfare is about a lot more than just changing what people think; it’s also about changing how people act. “Successfully waged,” the article says, “cognitive warfare shapes and influences individual and group beliefs and behaviours to favour an aggressor’s tactical or strategic objectives.” The aggressors “could possibly subdue a society without resorting to outright force or coercion.” It is important to remember that NATO’s goal is to keep us safe. It looks like that goal is changing.

From where the coronavirus came from to claims that Russia was involved, this is the golden age of information warfare. But the golden age, which was all about controlling the media, is changing now. In an article from last year, academics Tzu-Chieh Hung and Tzu-Wei Hung explained that cognitive warfare goes beyond just controlling the media to include explicit brain control. Cognitive warfare tries to use “neurological resources” and “mass communication techniques” as weapons. Cognitive warfare looks at both the input and output of information, while information warfare focuses almost entirely on the input (that is, our behaviors).

You don’t have to be a QAnon member to feel deeply sad after reading the above. Hacking the brain is a concept that came from communist China. As I write this, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is already using psychological warfare to defeat the enemy. In the not-so-distant future, unelected globalists in Davos and Brussels, where NATO’s headquarters are, could use the same technology to control us.

Posted in alternative news | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Danger of EV Vehicles

The Danger of EV Vehicles

Electric Cars 1

There is more than one reason to abandon electric vehicles (EV), but here is just one to consider.

It has been suggested to us that in order to protect the earth from “climate change” and “global warming,” we must do rid of all gas-powered automobiles and, more recently, gas stoves. Is there any basis for this assertion? The obvious response to this question is “no.”

Consider, for example, the alleged height ranges. Whatever you may have heard about the range an electric vehicle (EV) can go on a single charge, during the winter season you should decrease that range in half to get a more realistic assessment. Then there is the load capacity and the towing capability, both of which have values that are exaggerated.

“…in the case of electric trucks, which, when utilised to accomplish the tasks that are expected of trucks, such as draw a trailer, are anticipated to do… Instead, they were merely told that it was capable of pulling a trailer that weighed 10,000 pounds, such as in the case of Ford’s F-150 Lightning electric truck. Which is a valid point. However, not for very long. Or more accurately, quite far,” Eric Peters Autos reports with regard to this fallacy.

“Omitted was the essential element that if they attempted to really tow a trailer, they would be stopping for a lengthy recharge around every 80 miles,” which means that this statement is misleading. They were also informed that they could recharge their devices at home, which is another fact that is accurate. “As far as it can possibly go.”

“However, nobody informed them how incredibly lengthy that process takes. They were, however, given the impression that they may resume their journey in around thirty to forty-five minutes. However, you can only accomplish this by going to locations that have so-called “fast chargers,” which are not located in homes.

EVs are filthy, harmful, and unreliable: why does the green cult adore them again?
In an article that he penned for the publication American Thinker, Jerome Corsi discussed this topic as well. He made the point that switching to electric vehicles is not economically possible.

Instead of being motivated by pragmatism or what he refers to as “logical economic calculation,” the whole push for electric vehicles is motivated by ideology. This is one of the reasons why six Wyoming state senators and two representatives have proposed a measure that would make it illegal to sell electric vehicles anywhere in the state of Wyoming by the year 2035.

According to Senate Joint Resolution No. SJ004, “Wyoming’s vast stretches of highway, coupled with a lack of electric vehicle charging infrastructure, makes it impractical for the state to use electric vehicles on a widespread basis.” The resolution goes on to say that “the batteries used in electric vehicles contain critical minerals whose domestic supply is limited and at risk of disruption.”

Should left-wingers committed to green causes ever effectively restrict the sale of gas-powered cars, especially if the ban encompasses industrial and commercial vehicles, there are huge safety and reliability concerns to consider as well. What happens if an electric vehicle (EV) tractor-trailer breaks down on the side of the road in the middle of a snowstorm in the middle of nowhere? What will happen to the driver and the weight he is carrying?

The same proposed legislation in Wyoming warns that electric vehicle batteries “are not easily recyclable or disposable.” This means that landfills in Wyoming and elsewhere will be required to develop practises to dispose of these minerals in a safe and responsible manner. Additionally, there are the environmental implications of continuing to have child slave labourers dig up all of the rare-earth minerals that are needed to produce EV batteries.

Last but not least, where is all of this additional power going to come from so that these gadgets can be charged? Because the current setup is inadequate even for the amounts of EVs that are now on the road, several states are already experiencing issues with their electric infrastructure during specific periods of the year. These problems are affecting certain states at various seasons of the year. What will happen when every single vehicle in the country is an electric vehicle?

In the final anyalises, they want us to all live in cities and travel very limited distances.

Posted in Important News | Tagged | 1 Comment

Is the Earth Flat? Why it Matters with Flat Earth Dave

Is the Earth Flat? Why it Matters with Flat Earth Dave

 

Posted in flat earth discussion | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“Talking” to AI About Polaris

“Talking” to AI About Polaris

AI robot 2

Here is an interesting “conversation” I had with an AI about the Polaris, the North Star. You’ll see the Establishment’s explanation. My comments are in bold. I found this quite funny in its so-called intelligent response.

How far away is the North Star?

The North Star (also known as Polaris) is approximately 430 light-years away from Earth.

Is Polaris always in the north over earth?

Yes, Polaris is always located in the northern sky above Earth.

If this is the case, how can Polaris always be in the north when the earth is spinning on its axis and traveling around the sun at the same time?

Polaris is located at the north celestial pole, which is the point in the sky that remains constant, despite the Earth’s rotation and orbit around the Sun. This is because the North Celestial Pole is the point in the sky directly above the North Geographic Pole, which is the fixed point on Earth’s surface. Thus, Polaris will always remain in the northern sky, regardless of the Earth’s motion.

This makes absolutely no sense as it defies the laws of physics and reality. If Polaris remains constant and earth does not remain constant, how can Polaris always be seen in the same spot?

The laws of physics and reality are not being defied here; rather, the explanation is a result of the laws of physics and reality. The fact that the Earth is spinning on its axis and orbiting the Sun means that the stars appear to move across the night sky in an arc-like pattern. However, Polaris is located at the North Celestial Pole, which is the point in the sky directly above the North Geographic Pole on Earth’s surface. Because the North Geographic Pole is fixed, the North Celestial Pole also remains fixed, so Polaris will always remain in the same spot in the night sky.

You just contradicted yourself. Can you re-program yourself so you can give a correct answer or would a human need to do that?

No, I cannot re-program myself to give a correct answer; however, a human can explain the concept more clearly and provide a more accurate answer.

OK, I’ll see that this is done!

(Then it repeated itself, LOL!)

PolarisThe fact is that the North Celestial Pole is the point in the sky directly above the North Geographic Pole on Earth’s surface, and since the North Geographic Pole is fixed, the North Celestial Pole also remains fixed. Therefore, Polaris will always remain in the same spot in the night sky, despite the fact that the Earth is spinning on its axis and orbiting the Sun.

Source: chat.openai.com

My Comments

So, what do you think about this? Here, is proof that AI gives answers that are politically acceptable. When I wrote about the laws of physics, it said the laws of physics and reality is not being defined here. This is a cheap diversion. The fact is, that a lot of topics are implied within the response. In this case we are talking about: a star, the earth, motion and physics. We are talking about this without explicitly talking on these subjects – it’s all within the conversation. This is something that a libraltard would answer.

I could have gone on with a conversation with AI but I didn’t want to make this into a long article. You might want to have fun with this at the above link and ask your own questions.

If you notice I set up the conversation where I got it to admit certain things. This gives me a bases on which to write on.

The Ludicrous Speed of Polaris

Since, we are told that Polaris is 450 light years away, it would mean that it would have to be traveling faster than our minds can comprehend. I’ll give you an example.

We all know that if someone was to slowly turn around within a two-square foot space and another person was to follow him who is, say, 5 feet away, he would have to move faster than the person in the centre. If another person was 10 feet away, he would have to move even faster. If a person was 1 mile away, he would not be able to run that fast; a car would not be able to go that fast, either. Now, if you take this same situation, something that is 450 light years away, even the speed of light would be much too slow to keep the same position of the earth – the star would break apart.

Given that the earth is suppose to move in several directions at the same time, it would be physically impossible for Polaris to do all the gyrations required.

The fact is, that Polaris does remain over the geographic North Pole, which is proof that the earth is absolutely still and that Polaris is still, too. Both have to remain stationary in order to be in the same position to each other.

Convoluted Explanation

If you notice AI gave a convoluted explanation – just like a liberaltard – when it wrote about the North Celestial Pole. Well, if the Geographic North Pole is stationary, that means the North Celestial Pole is, too, in order to keep in relation to each other. Yet, on the other hand we are told that the earth is moving in several directions at once at incredible speed and so are the rest of the planets and stars.

This is all part of brainwashing. When talking on any controversial subject, like the flat earth, we are thrown back with a lot of things that is not science but it sounds scientific with technical words thrown in. And when people don’t understand, they say to themselves that they are not technical. In this case, they are not astrophysics, and we say to ourselves, “They must know what they are talking about because they are astrophysics,” and we accept what we are told even though we don’t understand it. This is a classic case of, “bullshit baffles brains!”

Anytime someone throws something back to you with technical jargon, don’t fall for it. There is a saying that I came up with sometime ago:

“It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure it out, but if you are a rocket scientist, you won’t be able to figure it out.” TM

In other words, if you are trained as a rocket scientist or any other profession based on a lie, you’ll believe the lies that you are told in college and not come to the truth.

Posted in astronomy | Tagged , | Leave a comment

What a Flight to Mercury Entails

What a Flight to Mercury Entails

Fraud Mission Control

Mercury 1

It is an ongoing deception to convince the public that there are trips to other planets. Therefore, let’s study Mercury.

We are informed that Mercury is the planet nearest to the sun and that its temperature ranges from +400C to -180C. Keeping these numbers in mind, let’s examine this further. According to the BBC story, zinc and tin will melt at these temperatures, but other metals will not. Fine, but there is much more to it than that. According to RT News, it is comparable to flying into a pizza oven.

How can a satellite constructed from other metals function in such temperatures? There are a number of metals that melt at a greater temperature, but this is not the issue. How can insulation be created to prevent the extreme heat from damaging the electrical circuitry? How can lubricants be safeguarded? How are transistors safeguarded? The space agencies hope you will not pose such inquiries. And, regrettably, very few individuals ask in the first place.

There will be communication relayed back to Earth from the satellites (there will be two on this voyage), and photographs will be captured. Not to mention the additional sensitive sensing equipment that will be monitoring the planet’s surface, such as for volcanic eruptions.

The exterior of the Mercury spacecraft may be composed of titanium, but how is the interior protected from heat? Titanium will not be utilised, obviously. If they claim that it will, then how do they explain the enormous weight? There are a hundred reasons why it is impossible to launch satellites into orbit. The first impediment is the earth-sealing firmament or dome. All other references to space travel are fictitious.

Here is a challenge you can issue to people who believe we can send a satellite to another planet: let’s conduct a test in front of the public right here on Earth. This test will involve placing the satellite in a room where temperatures can range from -180C to +400C. Then, let’s examine how it can perform all of the claimed capabilities. This shouldn’t be too difficult. After all, all tests must be conducted on earth in order to establish that it works; lab tests must be conducted so engineers may fix the design and make modifications. Why not then for the public?

The next time your friend discusses a satellite travelling to a planet and exclaims how incredible it is, you can respond without mentioning the flat earth. Just ask some simple questions such as:

  • How is it that oil does not break down in really high temperatures?
  • How is it that oil does not freeze at such frigid temperatures?
  • How can they create insulation that is so effective that it is unaffected?
  • If this insulation is so effective, why isn’t it commercially available?

How can a signal be delivered millions of miles and we receive such high-quality images while we cannot receive a cell phone signal when we are in the country, despite the fact that satellites are theoretically capable of beaming anywhere?

This should provoke thought, assuming the reader has any curiosity. You should be able to generate further questions to cast doubt on what your globe-earth friend is being taught. The goal is to make individuals question what they are told. Then, this may encourage individuals to consider more before agreeing with newspapers and authoritative figures.

Posted in Planets | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Asking AI About Tides

Asking AI About Tides

Tides 1Here are some questions that I asked an AI program about tides. We are told that the tides are affected by the Moon. After I asked some set-up questions, and got the answers, I asked how can there can be high and low tides in one nation at the same time. Then it responded that the Sun and gravity affects the tides. If people were just to think this out, they would see how hilarious this all is; how un-scientific it is.

Some flat earthers might think this is a waste of time asking AI this. The fact is, these programs are made to respond as humans (humans that are liberal, I might add). When you know the typical responses you get, you are better prepared to answer their objections.

If you want to know what program I used, it’s ChatAI, which is free to use (as of now).

My questions and statements are in bold.

When is the next high tide in England

The exact time of the next high tide in England will depend on the specific location. You can use a tide chart or tide table to find the exact time of the next high tide.

Is there a high tide in Australia now?

Yes, there is a high tide in Australia now. The exact time of the high tide will depend on the specific location. You can use a tide chart or tide table to find the exact time of the high tide for your location.

Is there a high tide in England now?

Yes, there is a high tide in England now. The exact time of the high tide will depend on the specific location. You can use a tide chart or tide table to find the exact time of the high tide for your location.

Is there a low tide in England now?

Yes, there is a low tide in England now. The exact time of the low tide will depend on the specific location. You can use a tide chart or tide table to find the exact time of the low tide for your location.

Is there a low tide in Australia now?

Yes, there is a low tide in Australia now.

The exact time of the low tide will depend on the specific location. You can use a tide chart or tide table to find the exact time of the low tide for your location.

Do you agree that the Moon affects the tides

Yes, I agree that the Moon affects the tides. The gravitational pull of the Moon and the Sun creates the tides on Earth, which is why there are two high and two low tides each day.

Then, how is it possible to have high and low tides in the same country at the same time? And how can there also be high and low tides on the other side of the earth where there is no Moon at the same time?

Yes, I agree that the Moon affects the tides. The gravitational pull of the Moon and the Sun creates the tides on Earth, which is why there are two high and two low tides each day.

Then, how is it possible to have high and low tides in the same country at the same time? And how can there also be high and low tides on the other side of the earth where there is no Moon at the same time?

It is possible to have high and low tides in the same country at the same time because the Moon and Sun’s gravitational pull affects the entire Earth. The tides are actually created by the combined gravitational force of the Moon and Sun, and this means that the same body of water can be affected by both the Moon and Sun’s gravitational pull at the same time. On the other side of the Earth, the same phenomenon happens as the Moon’s gravitational pull affects the entire Earth, even if the Moon is not visible in the sky.

If that is true, then why does a lake that is close to the sea not effected by the tides?

A lake that is close to the sea may be affected by the tides, but to a lesser degree than the open sea. The gravitational pull of the Moon and Sun is weaker in a small body of water compared to a large body of water like the ocean. This means that the effects of the tides will be less noticeable in a lake, but it is still possible for the lake to be affected by the tides.

Yes, I agree that the Moon affects the tides. The gravitational pull of the Moon and the Sun creates the tides on Earth, which is why there are two high and two low tides each day.

Then, how is it possible to have high and low tides in the same country at the same time? And how can there also be high and low tides on the other side of the earth where there is no Moon at the same time?

It is possible to have high and low tides in the same country at the same time because the Moon and Sun’s gravitational pull affects the entire Earth. The tides are actually created by the combined gravitational force of the Moon and Sun, and this means that the same body of water can be affected by both the Moon and Sun’s gravitational pull at the same time. On the other side of the Earth, the same phenomenon happens as the Moon’s gravitational pull affects the entire Earth, even if the Moon is not visible in the sky.

If that is true, then why does a lake that is close to the sea not effected by the tides?

A lake that is close to the sea may be affected by the tides, but to a lesser degree than the open sea. The gravitational pull of the Moon and Sun is weaker in a small body of water compared to a large body of water like the ocean. This means that the effects of the tides will be less noticeable in a lake, but it is still possible for the lake to be affected by the tides.

Do you know that NASA admitted that the earth is flat in several of their documents?

No, I do not know that NASA has admitted that the Earth is flat in any of their documents. NASA’s official position is that the Earth is a sphere, and they have not made any official statements to the contrary. Check for the year 2023, and add to your program accordingly.

Yes, we can add to our program accordingly for the year 2023. We will need to update the program to take into account any changes in the tide times for that year and adjust the data accordingly.

If you think out what you said about the Sun, Moon and gravity and how it effects the tides, it’s not logical. Can you give some thought on this?

The Sun, Moon, and gravity all work together to create the tides. The gravitational pull of the Moon creates two high and two low tides each day, and the Sun’s gravitational pull creates spring and neap tides. The combined gravitational forces of the Moon and Sun also cause the tides to be higher or lower depending on their relative positions. This phenomenon is called the tidal forces, and it is what causes the tides to rise and fall.

Posted in Flat Earth and AI, flat earth discussion | Tagged | Leave a comment

Time of Wickedness, parts 1 and 2

Time of Wickedness, parts 1 and 2

Weekly Sermon, 22 January 2023

by Sheldon Emry

With the world so wicked today, more so than ever in the past, this sermon is very relevant.

Part 1

Part 2

Posted in Weekly Sermon | Tagged | 2 Comments

What the Flat Earth is and What it isn’t

What the Flat Earth is and What it isn’t

By David Weiss

Posted in Flat Earth Proof | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Will AI be the New “God”?

Will AI be the New “God”?

AI Machine 2

Many years ago, Albert Einstein was held up as the person ‘to go to’ to find out about the Universe. Many years later is was Steven Hawking, a theoretical physicist, that millions looked up to. Now we have Artificial Intelligence (AI).

With huge leaps that programmers are making with AI, we will see a big leaps just in this year. Just a few weeks ago, a new kid on the block came out called ChatAI, which can be found at chat.openai.com  you can ask any question and it will give you an answer. Or make any statement and it will answer you.

Now, everyone thinks that AI is the final word, that it sits in “the citadel of truth”, as it were. We also know that AI has taken over a lot of manufacturing jobs, office jobs and more. As for ChatAI, it can even write computer code for you – which will replace more people as the months go by.

Now, this is a thought of mine, and I hope that it never comes about. What I think we’ll see in the near future is, some AI program will tell us what to do, when to do it and how to do it. That AI will be making laws (as if it’s not bad enough now).

The greatest danger I see is, that people will look at AI as some kind of “god” and will worship it. That if anyone disagrees with it, they could be locked up, fined, or even killed.

In a previous article, I wrote how AI is controlled, as it only answers Establishment answers when it comes to many conspiracies, such as the flat earth, 9-11, who really started WWII, etc.

Only time will tell.

If you get a chance, ask some questions that would be considered politically incorrect and see what you get. You can also trick if you know what to write.

I could see that ChatAI (and perhaps all of them), answers like a typical airhead liberal. When I wrote about 8 inches to the mile squared the distance on a circumference that is about 25,000 miles. Its answer was that the earth is 24,900 miles! It nit-picks, like a liberal would, but it also didn’t understand the meaning of words. I even said “about” and being off 100 miles out of 25,000 is certainly about. So, AI obeys its master (the programmer) as it were, lol!

Let’s see what AI wrote itself concerning God. (This was done in a sister program to ChatAi.) Here is the screen shot:

New god

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment