The Importance of Perspective In Understanding the Flat Earth Model, part 3

Posted on April 16, 2017 by revealed4you

The Importance of Perspective In Understanding the Flat Earth Model, part 3

From the booklet: The Sea-Earth Globe and its Monstrous Hypothetical Motions: or Modern Theoretical Astronomy

1918

Note: Punctuation and grammar is as in the original.

THE THREE POLE TRICK

We have been authoritatively assued that the curvature of water can be proved by three poles, and a notable incident is referred to on the Bedford Canal, Cambridgeshire.

“If three poles of exactly the same height e placed in a line, the middle one always appears higher than the other two outer ones….if a telescope be sited along the first to the third pole, the top of the middle pole will appear above the line joining the tops of the outer two.” Elm. Phys., by R.A. Gregory, F.R.A.S.

The above paragraph is vague and specious. What is meant by sighting the telescope “along” the first pole to the third? Is it here the trick comes in? The third pole, being farthest off, will appear perspectively smaller; and the first will not be seen at all if the glass be laid “along” the top of it. The telescope should be placed at some distance away from the first pole, when the line of sight would be found running along the level tops of each pole. Refer to figures 14 and 15. the line of sight from A to C is ot parallel to a line of tangential at A; but it ought to be if there be no trick of collimation in the telescope.

But suppose pole B seems higher than C. shift the glass “along” B, and add a fourth pole at D, equally high and distant. Now pole C “will always” appear higher than pole B; so that C is both lower and higher than B! Which is absurd, as Eculid says.

When the noted wager was tried on the Bedford Canal, the lens should have been turned half-way round to test whether there was any “trick” in the telescope; but J. Hampden was not sufficiently sharp. Sire A. R. Wallace was doubtless honest, but the glass may have tricked him! Through a friend I sent him a challenge to shew in print HOW the bet was won, promising to reply courteously; but to me he never replied. Hence of that incident we may write R.I.P. But I retain copies of the official photographs taken at the time, in case any other globite cares to pick up my glove.

My friend “Parallax” (Dr. Rowbottam) had tried many experiments on that canal between 1838 and 1862; and after the bet affair he again went and carefully tested the water for six miles, with various powerful telescopes. He found the surface perfectly level, as before; and his experiments have several times been published, but never refuted. Yet the canal is still there!

For proof “How they cook science,” see the London Daily Chronicle, Jan. 14th, 1893.

The above figure 15B illustrates the supposed curvature when, as is often the case in clear weather, a great extent of sea surface is visible looking in opposite directions, say 25 miles each way. This should give a dip of 420 feet on each side. If the sea were globular, the curvature of its surface ought to be plainly visible, especially from a balloon, for a sweep of 50 miles, looking both ways; but no such curvature has ever been seen, even for longer stretches, but only one vast and uniform level, rising perspectively to the eye-line. See figure 15B and compare it with any good sea-scape. Fig. 15A shews what ought to be seen from a balloon (E) if the sea were globular.

Posted in Flat earth and science, Flat Earth Experiments, Flat Earth Questions | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Importance of Perspective In Understanding the Flat Earth Model, part 2

Posted on April 14, 2017 by revealed4you

The Importance of Perspective In Understanding the Flat Earth Model, part 2

Ships Climbing Both Ways

From the booklet: The Sea-Earth Globe and its Monstrous Hypothetical Motions: or Modern Theoretical Astronomy

1918

Note: Punctuation and grammar is as in the original.

fig. 12

In figure 11 we have shown an illustratio used to support the false perspective, and flase teaching, of the schools; but while some of the higher class astronomical books do not disgrace their pages with such a palpable monstronsity, their teachings are in agreement therewith, and some of their diagrams equally faulty.

Let an observer be placed on some small island in mid-ocean, as represented in figure 12, where he can watch ships sail away from him in opposite directions: now if figure 11 be a true picture of the surface shape of the sea, and the observer on turning round sees a similar rise of the water on opposite sides, then the surface of the ocean would consist of a series of bulges, continued ad infinitum, as indicated by figure 12!

STILL MOUNTING UPWARDS

fig.  13

Now let there be a series of observers, as implied in figure 13: the first observer on the right sees the vessel mount hill number one. At this point let there be another observer watching the same ship going in the same direction; he should see it mount up hill number two. And a third observer, similarly placed, should see the vessel still mounting up hill number three; and so on, up towards the moon! This would agree with the theory that the moon temporarily attracts the waters of the ocean – but who would trust himself to that theory to make the voyage?

We may well leave the theory of a globular sea to the reprobation of all honest thinkers. Yet Sir Robert Ball, in comon with some other astronomers, maintains that an observer on the seashore, in watching a receding vessel, actually views it mounting a hill, or a “protruberant” part of the ocaen, until it reaches the horizon, when it begins to descent! If the sea-earth were a globe, the observer should always be placed on the top, near the sea-level; and the receding ship should at once begin to descent. But as perspective requires objects below the eye-line to appear to rise in the distance, the globularist is thus unconsciously constrained to yield this testimony as a concession to truth!

CURVATURE OR DIP

fig.  14

In calculating the amount of curvature, or dip below the eye-line of the observer, we have a smile rule, ignoring some small decimal points, namely: – Square the number of miles given as the distane, and multiply the product by eight inches, and divide by twelve, which will give in feet the depth of the dip from the obserer’s line of sight. This is true for a globe of 25,000 miles circumference; thus in six miles there would be a dip of 24 feet, and in twelve miles a dip of 96 feet.

But in calculating the depth of the dip, zetetics often have made an unnecessary concession to the globularist, by deducting from the distance the object the place of the point where the eye-line is supposed to move downwards to touch the earth, or the level of the water. This is a concession to the false views of perspective given in school books, such as we have illustrated in our fig. 11, and to which the student can turn. Yet in spite of this unnecessary concession, zetetics have shown that distant objects are often visible when they ought to be out of sight, and a long way below the horizon, if the sea be globular!

If we turn to the laws of true perspective, as already given, we shall see that this deduction is not only unnecessary, but that, moreover, the height of the observer should be in strictness be added to the amount of dip.

Let us turn to fig 14 to illustrate the fact. Let the point E represent the position of the observer on the sea-level; his line of sight would be tangent to the sphere at the place of observation, as shewn by line E H, and the dip of an object at J would be represented by the line H J. now raise the observer to the height of the telescope at F; and parallel to E H, therefore the dip from G to J is manifestly greater than that from H to J. and this is true whether we reckon the dip towards the centre of the globe in the direction of G L, or at right-angles from the line of sight G M.

Posted in Flat earth and science, Flat Earth Experiments | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Wernher von Braun and Space Suits

Posted on April 12, 2017 by revealed4you

Wernher von Braun and Space Suits

In this short video are two great topics on the flat earth. The first part is about Wernher von Braun and why he had the Bible verse on his grave stone that he had. The second part is what happens to a space suite IF it was really in the vacuum of space.

.

All Governments Of The World Know

We all know that the earth is flat and we know that NASA knows this, too. Which also means the whole establishment knows about this. Now, when we supposedly went to the moon in 1969, the Soviet Union knew that there was a firmament and that the earth was flat. We were told that Communism was a diametrically opposite of democracy in the West. So, why didn’t they blow the whistle that the earth was flat? They didn’t; they played along with the U.S. Now, nearly 50 years later, do we hear Putin saying that the world if flat? Do we hear Communist China say this? Why not – IF they are opposed to what the “democracies” are doing? The fact is, that Russia and China knows that there is a dome over the earth, they know that the world is flat and they – by implication – know that there is no such things as evolution. They also know that there is a God above. Yet, they all keep silent, or should I say, they all keep telling the same lies.

It would have been so easy for the Russian Communists to say that America faked the moon landing but they didn’t. Perhaps they didn’t back then because they would have been called “flat earth nutters” or something like that. And since the Communist couldn’t control the newspapers back then, no matter what they wrote would not have been published (there was no internet back then). With the internet, do you hear anything from Communist China or from present day Russia? No, as the game has to be kept going; this is all part of the control of the people and milking them for billions of dollars for “space exploration.”

Posted in Flat Earth Experiments, moon landing hoax, NASA Space Programs | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Importance of Perspective In Understanding the Flat Earth Model

Posted on April 12, 2017 by revealed4you

The Importance of Perspective In Understanding the Flat Earth Model

From the booklet: The Sea-Earth Globe and its Monstrous Hypothetical Motions: or Modern Theoretical Astronomy

1918

Note: Punctuation and grammar is as in the original.

Perspective, True and False

Some of the Laws of Perspective are given in the given in the first part of this book, so that we need not here enlarge upon them; but as they are very important, we briefly recapitulate them.

1 All parallel lines, like those of a railway, seem to approach, and finally to meet in the distance.

2 Straight lines above the eye of the spectator appear to descend to the eye-line.

3 The horizontal, or eye-line, is a straight line on a level with the eye, at whatever elevation the spectator may be.

4 Lines, or objects, below the eye-line, remaining at the same level, seem to rise as they recede, until they vanish in the eye-line.

5 Similarly, lines or objects above the height of the spectator, and maintaining a constant altitude, appear to descent until they are lost in the eye-line.

6 Objects, or lines, do not all vanish at the same point in the horizontal line, but the nearer they are to that line the sooner they vanish in it, because of the smaller angle they make with it.

7 The distant horizon being always on alevel with the eye, whatever be the altitude of the observer, it seems to rise, or to fall, with the observer; but he never has occasion to depress his vision to look downwards towards it, nor upwards!

Now let us apply these rules, which are the Laws of true Perspective, to the disappearance of ships at sea, as illustrated in zetetic diagrams, and validate in those of the globularist. First take Fig. 10 on the title page of Part II. The intelligent reader will soon see that this zetetic diagram harmonises with, and illustrates, the first six rules above given. The hull of the vessel, being nearer the eye-line, vanishes according to rule 6, before the flags and upper sails, which are farther from it, because the lower angle is the lesser. Besides, the hull rides on a dark background of water, while the upper masts and sails are often against a bright sky! But the ship never goes over, and then down on the further side of a bulge, or a hill of water; for in clear weather a good telescope, which magnifies the distant angle of vision, brings again the ship’s hull in sight. Had the ship gone over and beyond the supposed dip, or curvature, no telescope could fetch it back again; and when the crest of the supposed hill of water the hull itself should become visible against the background of a clear sky! But in harmony with rule 4, ships never so disappear, because there is no real rise or protuberance in calm sea, which, as we have abundantly shewn is everywhere level or horizontal.

FALSE PERSPECTIVE OF THE SCHOOLS

Let us now turn to the false perspective sometimes given in globite diagrams, and books on geography.

Our figure 11 is taken from a high-class school book; and in Scott’s Astronomy there is another on the same principle, or, rather, on the same lack of principle. This diagram violates every law of true perspective. The observer at A is made to look down to his distant horizon, and so is the one at B, though in the diagram he appears to look up. This is a double violation of rule 7 as given above. And, further, the reader will notice how the feet of the observers are not pointing towards the centre, as they should be if the earth be globular. The diagram is a “scientific” fraud; whether intentional, or unintentional, we need not here discuss.

Suppose the observer at A were to turn round and to look downwards in the opposite direction towards G, what would he see? An awful chasm at which the stoutest heart would quail! The thing, and the ideas it represents, are a disgrace to modern education! Is it any wonder, therefore, that a famous writer like Goethe should say, “I cures this modern theory of Cosmogony, and hope that perchance there may appear some strong scientist of genius who will take up the courage to upset this universally disseminated delirium of lunatics.” – See The Scientific American, April 27th, 1878

To see See The Scientific American, April 27th, 1878, CLICK HERE. It is fascinating reading of what technology was back then. There are many article in the past in The Scientific American that never came on the market because of special money interest groups.

Posted in Flat earth and science, Flat Earth Experiments, Old flat earth news, Water and flat earth | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

What American Foreign Policy Should Be

Posted on April 12, 2017 by revealed4you

What American Foreign Policy Should Be


Note: This is from an article that I wrote many years ago (1999). So, you will see names and events that are presented in the present tense. Also, notice that Donald Trump advocated tariffs. Well, he did not discover this, this was used by the United States when it was founded as a nation and it has been advocated by many – including yours truly – way before Trump made his campaign promises (that are yet to be fulfilled).

As you know, the United States has been involved in many foreign wars in the last century. Reading Pat Buchanan’s book, A Republic Not An Empire, he clearly outlines that this was not the purpose of the Founding Fathers nor of our leaders after them. It was only with the start of the Spanish American War that our policy had started to change.

I would like to add to this, doing so in as few words as possible. In the computer age, where people want things in ‘sound bites,’ they don’t have the time or the interest in listening to a long detailed account. With this article, I hope to present enough of a case to make people think about how wrong our foreign policy is.

Presidents, like George Bush and Clinton says that our ‘national interest’ is at stake. Let’s see if this is true. With the Gulf War, we were told that American interests were at stake. By getting involved in foreign wars, we had actually made it worse for Americans at home and abroad. How? The fact that we did get involve, it makes the country that we fought against anti-American.

We often hear about terrorists in our country; bombing of some building, someone getting caught with explosives who is tied to some terrorist group. Why do we have this happening now more so than in the past. BECAUSE we have got ourselves involved in the affairs of other nations.

Our purpose as a nation was not to get into foreign conflicts. Even if this was our purpose and if it was spelled out in our Constitution—which it wasn’t—it would be wrong. So, I’m not saying this because we were founded on principles of not getting in involved in European affairs, or other affairs for that matter, but from a point of view of what is better for our nation.

To drive home the point more, let’s look at nations who haven’t been ‘the policemen of the world,’ as the US has.

There are many nations who have not been involved in foreign wars. Has their freedom been effected? NO! Look at the many small nations in Europe and other parts of the world—their freedom has not been effect regardless of which side won. If we look at the US, there are many wars going on all over the world that we have not been involved in, and this has not effect our freedom. The only reason we have not been involved in these other wars is because their was no economic interest for big business to benefit. Or, if there was, our military was tied up in some other on-going conflict. We may have a large military complex, but not enough to get involved in all conflicts.

Looking back in history before a time when there was a ‘policemen of the world,’ our nation and others were not involved in some far off conflict. Did it affect their freedom or economic interest? Again, the answer is a resounding NO!

Many times we are told that it’s to safeguard our access to raw materials that we must get involved. On this principle, it is wrong for us to get involved for this reason, as peoples’ lives are more important than some material interest—meaning the lives of our soldiers.

Natural Resources

Again, let’s take a look at the Gulf War conflict, for those who say that this would safeguard our oil interest. Such was plainly not the case. To look at the surface of this argument, regardless if Iraq won the war against Kuwait or not—and they easily would had not other nations been involved—the oil would have continued to be shipped to our shores. We were on friendly terms with this nation before the war, and after they war, they would have continued to sell to us. But by getting involved—and on the wrong side at that—it actually disrupted the flow of oil. Even after the war, we put an economic boycott on Iraq, which includes oil. As for getting oil from Kuwait, this was disrupted by the bombing of the oil refineries, which took two years to get back on line.

So, why was this war fought? For two reasons: One, that it was fought to destroy Israeli’s enemy—the main reason. Second, that it got the excess oil of the world markets, as Iraq’s sale was depressing international oil price.

Now, we’ll take a look at this from the general point of view. Regardless of what natural resources other nations have, we will still have access to it. For whoever wins the war, we will still have the opportunity to buy what they produce. If a nation wins that doesn’t produce the natural resources, they would control the other nation and sell to us. If a nation wins that does process these resources, they will continue to sell to us. By our involvement, and other nations—under the umbrella of the United Nations—we actually prolong the war, not to mention the destruction of their infrastructure. If we get involved in a war where the nation that has the natural resources loses, but still have control of their material resources, they will not want to sell to us, which is natural. By remaining neutral, both sides would have appreciate it and would continue to sell to us.

Nation That Doesn’t Want to Sell

We are supposed to be a nation who believes in self-determination. If this is so, then it is the right of each nation to sell what they want at what price they want. How would you like to be told that you have to sell to such-and-such a person at a certain price? You wouldn’t like that would you. Nor do other nations like that, too. Sadly, the right to sell to whom we want is denied to Americans, so it is only natural that we are taking away this freedom from other nations. For decades now, we are told that we have to rent to blacks, Mexicans, or whomever, regardless of our past experience with these people. This applies to selling homes, serving food, etc.

In a truly free society this choice should be left to the individual. There will be many others who will sell, rent or provide services to others who are turned down.

If during a conflict of a war, which was kept local, we still have other choices to get out raw material, or manufactured ones for that matter. In most cases, there are other nations that we can buy the raw material for finished products from. Then, there is the stockpile or reserves that we can use during this time.

A nation should use the same common sense that the head of a family should use. A husband would not leave his car tank on empty when he knows that his family would have needed to drive somewhere. He would not leave the oil heater nearly empty, the pantry empty, or spend all the money he has saved. Thus, a nation should have reserves of all natural resources, especially if it’s a material that only one or two nations of the world produce. This is just common sense, which, unfortunately, most people and nations lack.

Manufacturing is the Key

The United States has many natural resources, though in an age where there are many different materials needed to produce the things that we use, we do not need to have the resources to do so. Take a look at nations like Germany and Japan. They have little in the way of natural resources, but they can get whatever they need to produce things like cars, TVs, computers, etc. They can get the raw materials they need from every corner of the world. The nations that have little in the way of manufactured goods, but much in natural resources, can sell what they have for things that they need. Thus, all nations prosper.

Though there are many chemicals and minerals that the United States does not produce, we can virtually manufacture all that is need in this age of modern technology. There is no machinery that we don’t have or can’t buy; no talent that we need to make the things of modern science. Thus, we can trade what we make for that which we need. The second and third world nations that don’t have the money to buy the equipment needed or the talent to make such things a computer and cars, but can sell what they have for what they need. Thus, all nations benefit.

In the past decades, many of our factories closed down because of cheap imported goods, or have relocated overseas to take advantage of cheap labor. This is the result of bad government. However, this can be corrected, by giving companies tax incentives to come back. By having tariffs that increase the price of these cheap goods, the US government can make it more attractive to produce these same products within our nation.

The Need for Tariffs

Many people are against tariffs, even patriotic Americans. However, if tariffs are used right, it would be a great benefit for American workers. First, let’s take a look at some facts.

Neither the United States, nor any other nation can control what other governments and businesses do, nor should they. Although they try, it’s a dismal failure. If another government wants to subsidize their business, it’s their business. If companies in other countries want to pay their employees less, there’s nothing we can do. When we do try to dictate to other countries, it costs us billions of dollars in sending over our military, not to say the cost of lives in wars fought. This is very costly, yet it produces no products that people can use. It also produces no peace. So, it’s definitely a ‘lose, lose’ situation.

Another thing to consider is, that people should have freedom of choice in what they buy. So, how do we solve a situation where people may purchase things made in other countries but also have work so they can buy things? The answer is tariffs on imported goods.

If tariffs are put on goods that can be sold in our country cheaper than what we can produce, a tax should be put on it so when it’s sold in the market it would have the same price as those ‘Made in the USA.’ What would this produce? It would keep businesses opened in the US, employ our people, keep our economy strong, and give the people the choice to buy from other countries IF they so chose.

Some people may say that this can’t be done. Anything can be done if it’s the law of the land. Look at how many bad laws that we have; yet most people obey them even if they don’t like it. With a law that benefits businesses and workers, creates peace and prosperity, people would be happy. Businesses would still be free to locate in other countries, but they won’t have the freedom to put Americans out of work, neither would foreign companies. If they want to sell to other countries that don’t have a tariff, or one that is as high as the US, they can do so. For people who say that this will cause trade wars, so be it. However, they will only be denying their own people products from our country. If it comes to this, the American economy is huge and will produce enough money to satisfy businesses at home. Businesses in other countries who want to sell to our huge economy, will either have to settle for having their products on par with American made products or leave. They can sell to other countries including their own.

If a nation needs our products, they’ll buy from us. Most nations don’t manufacture high technological things, so they would have to come to us.

Think of the uselessness for one nation to ship goods to another that nation makes the same goods; then the other nation shipping their own kind of products back. This is a waste of time, money and fuel. This results in a lose-lose situation all the way around.

Posted in Bible Studies | Tagged | Leave a comment

Donald Trump’s Old Posts on Syria Very Revealing

Posted on April 11, 2017 by revealed4you

Donald Trump’s Old Posts on Syria Very Revealing

Trump’s Old Posts on Syria

Donald Trump bears witness against himself.

Here are some old tweets by Trump made in 2013. His complaint against President Obama and what he did is exactly what Trump is doing now!

.

.

.

.

Posted in false flag, mind control | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Donald Trump’s Bombing On Syria Is Illegal

Posted on April 10, 2017 by revealed4you

Donald Trump’s Bombing On Syria Is Illegal

Where is the protective clothing for sarin?

Donald Trump’s bombing on Syria is illegal, immoral and NOT Christian. Of course, we can’t say that he was Christian in the first place – despite his loud mouth claims that he is during his campaign. Let’s take a look at what we were told happened. About 84 people killed by sarin nerve gas. This we were told was done by Syrian planes.

There was no proof that Assad did it in the first place. Where is the proof? Then, look at how fast the US acted. You can’t determine anything that quick! Not only that, how did the US know what airfield it took off from?

I’m sure you have heard the story that Assad has no gas, and even if he did, he knows it would be counter productive if he used it, as a few days before Trump said, “that there is no need for regime change.” So, why would Assad risk doing this? It makes no sense.

This sarin nerve gas attack has all the markings that it was either: set up to make like Syria did it or that it was all faked to begin with.

If you notice the pictures of the rescue workers – they did NOT have protective clothing and one person didn’t even have gloves! You can’t go into an area without protective clothing, heavy rubber gloves and a respirator (not a gas mask). We also know that regular clothing does not protect you from sarin. And once on your skin you can die in one minute. Yet, the rescue workers did not have protective clothing. This tells you that we were told a lie. So, how did the people die? It would have had to been another type of gas. There there is another problem – how do we know that people actually died? We know that the US government has lied many times in the past and that they have created false flags. Is this one of them? I don’t know, I’m just asking the question.

  We do know of the false flag of Sandy Hook shooting, of the shooting in the queer bar in Orlando, Florida. Heck we even know of the fake moon landing. So, why couldn’t this be faked? If you have seen Stanley Kubrick’s film Wage the Dog, you have seen where a fake war was staged in order to bring in a real war. This was information given by the Kubrick in the film to let people know, even in a subtle way, that such things this is done in government. After all, he should know as he filmed “the moon landing” back in 1969.

The other illegal thing that was done in this Syrian attack is, that Donald Trump did not wait until international agencies, such as the UN, investigate. Trump thinks that this is a TV game show – that the first one that hits the big red button wins. This is not a game, Trump!

Some say that Trump is ignorant of the crookedness of government. Really? He certainly knows about the lying media, he knows about fake news. And, most importantly, he knows about websites like Alex Jones. (Remember he was interviewed by Jones for about 30 minutes during the campaign.) So, he could still go to certain alternative website sources if he feels that his security agency is lying to him or hiding things from him. He can at least get another view, think on it, then act. But no, he went straight ahead.

Problem, Reaction, Solution

We have the typical “problem, reaction and solution,” that has been identical with other “regime change” in the Middle East. This, alone makes you think that this is all staged. Or, even if people are really killed, it’s staged in the sense that it’s created by the West. What do I mean? Listen to the key words used; words that play on your emotions. Remember the picture of a man carry a baby boy on the shore that drowned. This was used as a reason to bring in more Muslim immigrants into Europe. What about when we heard about Muammar Gaddafi “killing his own people?” What happened? It got the West to bomb Libya. Sure, Gaddafi had his soldiers kill people BUT, were they his own? The fact is, when you have people attacking the government, ALL GOVERNMENTS would react in the same way and defend themselves. The fact is, that with all these revolutions in the Middle East and North Africa, it was instigated by the West to topple governments. And most of the people used (not all) were criminal elements from other countries were brought in, including criminal elements within the country. They were given weapon, training and money by the West to topple respective countries. It was ONLY THEN, that the “killing of their own people started.” Notice that before in each of these countries there was peace.

The fake news media, of course, don’t tell you this part. They just come in when the fighting starts. If people started to storm the Capitol Building and the State Department, for example, you bet that the police and soldiers would be killing their own people. But you see, the government is a big liar and hypocrite so you wont hear them say they are doing the same thing that they charged Gaddafi and Assad with.

What did Donald Trump say? “Innocent children and that no none of God’s children should die like this,” (paraphrasing). In other words, really playing on your heartstrings. But he completely ignores the fact that if the West wasn’t in Syria in the first place none of this would have happened. At least it would not have happened on our watch. Of course, Trump completely ignores the hundreds of thousands that have died in Syria before all this started; where is the outcry from him about all these people?

All this fighting and wanting Assad out is the help Israel – which Trump said he’s is behind 100%.

Posted in false flag, media lies, mind control | Tagged , | Leave a comment

David Irving: One Man’s Fight For The Truth

Posted on April 10, 2017 by revealed4you

David Irving: One Man’s Fight For The Truth

Here the fascinating life-story of David Irving in how he started his quest for the truth of what really happened in World War II. Like the flat earth cover up, so is the true story of World War II. Irving, unlike the politically correct authors who write from their armchairs, met with the people who personally knew Adolf Hitler and other high NS officials. In some cases, he met with National Socialist officers themselves. The result being, that Irving was told information that the Zionist controlled media will never touch and that schools will never teach.

If you go to a library in the UK you can not find one of Irving’s books, nor can you find them in a book store. We are talking about a world famous British historian that don’t have his books in their own libraries. The reason is, that it victors of WW II do not want the public to know the truth; and one of those victors or Allies, was the United Kingdom.

When David Irving started off writing in the 1960s his books were on the Best Seller’s list and was in the Sunday Telegraph newspaper where they ran a series of articles based on his books. But it was not until Irving started to write about Adolf Hitler that got the Edomites mad.

The first book by Irving was titled: The Bombing of Dresden, where nearly 100,000 people died in 20 minutes! This became a national Best Seller, as the British people never heard of this and neither had the Germans. In the course of writing this book, Irving had interviewed about 300 people – from both sides of the war – who were there when it happened. (This was back in 1960 when many veterans of WWII were alive.)

You can find David Irving’s books online. Go to his website at: fpp.co.uk You can find some of his book there for free.

Posted in Censored books, Hidden history | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

How does the atmosphere keep up with the earth?

Posted on April 9, 2017 by revealed4you

How can the atmosphere keep up with the earth?

How does the atmosphere keep up with the earth? The simple answer is, IT CAN’T. But that doesn’t stop people from believing in a spinning earth (strange). This video shows the mathematics involved IF the earth is rotating. This video is good to show someone who knows math.

.

A new Page was added under “Other Conspiracies” check it out – it’s a “game changer.” Click Here

.

 

Posted in Gravity | Tagged , | Leave a comment

America’s Attack on Syria Exposed

Posted on April 8, 2017 by revealed4you

America’s Attack on Syria Exposed


America’s attack on Syria has been exposed. As you all know the U.S. had launched 59 Tomahawk missiles on Syria. The excuse was that Syria had used nerve gas on its own people. Here are things that are wrong with the story.

There is no proof that Syria has and used nerve gas or any other kind of chemical weapons

The rescue workers were not wearing protective. If this was Seron gas, the rescue workers would have been affected. You did not see protective clothing, rubber gloves or anything like that. Therefore, it looks like another false flag.

Of the 59 Tomahawk weapons used only 23 hit their targets. What happened to the rest? They can’t even find them! Of the missiles that hit their targets, they were poor targets. Six Syrian jets were undergoing repairs were hit, a barracks, a bunker that is it. In fact, the air base that was hit, none of the missile hit the runway. If you look at the aerial view, the missiles were all off the runway. Strange!

So, what caused the bad targets and the missing missiles? I can only guess at this and it could be:

1 The soldiers – whom Trump promised so much to – could have deliberately set their targets so that it would do the least damage.

2 The soldiers just can’t do their jobs

3 The technology is poor on those Tomahawk missiles

4 Russia’s air defence protected the airspace.

Whatever the cause, it does not bode well with Donald Trump.

Donald Trump has backed off on many of his promises and one big one was to the soldiers. Perhaps they got wise and what they did was make the missiles go off target. Could this be a way of getting back at Trump without being court martialed?

Russia, whom I believe, said that Syria doesn’t possess chemical weapons. And, from a common sense point of view, why would Assad use such weapons against his own people? Why would he use it against the enemy when he knows that the West would use this as justification to be attacked?

It seems strange that Syria would be charged with possessing such weapons but it’s OK for countries like the U.S., UK and other first world countries to have such weapons? This is hypocrisy!

Finally, IF America was to do the right thing, they would be out of Syria all together – regardless of what happens. Why? First, it’s Christian that is how foreign policies are to be; we are not to dictate to the rest of the world – especially to nations that have not attacked us.

Remember what George Washington said: (paraphrasing) “friendship with all nations, foreign entanglements with none. We are not to be the policeman of the world.”

It’s interesting to read other alternative website – they are all backing away from supporting Trump, while others are agreeing on some points but are putting him on the carpet on other points.

Joseph Paul Watson, who works with Alex Jones, said he had enough of Trump; while Alex Jones is still selling Trump t-shirts. It just might be a matter of time before he, too, backs off from supporting Trump.

The United States vs Russia

According to the UK Daily Mail, Putin said that America is one step away from a war, yet Donald Trump had the audacity to say that he will do it again. Putin said that Trump will have to get through him, as Russia has a battle ship that is between the U.S. battle ship and Syria.

The Daily Mail also has their spin articles. One claims that “Trump unleashed an awesome attack on Assad.” It goes on to say the attack had “pin-point accuracy.” This is really laughable! I bet Assad is laughing, too, as well as a lot former Trump supporters. What a joke, if you look at the aerial photo, you can see that the runway is still intact!

Another article said, “Assad’s base in ruins: Dramatic satellite photos reveal how airfield pounded with 59 Tomahawks cruise missiles is ‘almost completely destroyed’ after punishment for deadly chemical weapons attack.” Then it shows the nearly completely intact photo of the air field! This is really funny. How stupid do they (Daily Mail and other newspapers) think the people are?

One article went on to say, “where was Russia’s defense of Syria” The headline of this article is: Why didn’t Putin’s Growlers intercept Trump’s Tomahawks? Russian leader’s missile protection system failed to prevent attack on Syrian airfield.

Well, do the idiots that write the stories ever thought about what happened and that it could well have been caused by Russia’s advanced weaponry? By the looks of it, if Russian defense was working perfectly fine – that they guided the missiles to targets where it did little damage AND that the rest of the missiles did not hit any target. Great work Russia!

By allowing the missiles to enter the country and directing them where to go shows more advanced system then just shooting them out of the air! Again, this is another spin article by the liars that control the press.

Posted in false flag, Important News | Tagged , | Leave a comment