Why Did So Many Apollo Astro-nots Die Mysterious Deaths in Just Three Years Time?

Why Did So Many Apollo Astro-nots Die Mysterious Deaths in Just Three Years Time?

From: aplanetruth.info

Charred remains of fire on Apollo 1 that killed three astronots….so the story goes..

Just before we sent a man to the moon, as the official story goes, there were many mysterious deaths of Apollo candidates for the Moon shot. Were they silenced because they could not be mind controlled or counted on to keep the Great Lie going?

*****

Apollo/Satan and his fall from Heaven.

Apollo is a powerful God which has inspired several “demonic” or Abyssic Gods. Known as Helios by Nero Caesar, Phoebus or “Shining,” Apollo is the twin brother of Artemis (Diana). His center of worship was at was at Delphi and was renowned throughout the ancient world for its oracular advice delivered by a priestess called the Pythia the Chthonic serpent/dragon.

Nero Caesar and Domitian actually considered himself a manifestation of Apollo as he is the God of Illumination, Light, Music, Medicine and more. His arrows send plague and death which earned him the Biblical name of Apollyon or Abaddon, the King of the Bottomless Pit/ Lucifer.

“Apollo” is another name for Satan or Lucifer.

Isn’t it odd that NASA would name its first exploration of another celestial body after the great deceiver of men himself, Satan?

****

Deaths of key people involved with the Apollo program In a television program about the hoax theory, Fox Entertainment Group listed the deaths of 10 astronauts and of two civilians related to the manned spaceflight program as having possibly been killings as part of a coverup.

•Ted Freeman (T-38 crash, 1964)

•Elliott See and Charlie Bassett (T-38 accident, 1966)

•Virgil “Gus” Grissom (supposedly an outspoken critic of the Space Program) (Apollo 1 fire, January 1967) Ed White (Apollo 1 fire, January 1967) Roger Chaffee (Apollo 1 fire, January 1967)

•Ed Givens (car accident, 1967)

•C. C. Williams (T-38 accident, October 1967)

•X-15 pilot Mike Adams (the only X-15 pilot killed in November 1967 during the X-15 flight test program – not a NASA astronaut, but had flown X-15 above 50 miles).

•Robert Lawrence, scheduled to be an Air Force Manned Orbiting Laboratory pilot who died in a jet crash in December 1967, shortly after reporting for duty to that (later cancelled) program.

•NASA worker Thomas Baron Train crash, 1967 shortly after making accusations before Congress about the cause of the Apollo 1 fire, after which he was fired. Ruled as suicide.

•Paul Jacobs, a private investigator from San Francisco, interviewed the head of the US Department of Geology in Washington about the ‘moon rocks’. Did you examine the Moon rocks, did they really come from the Moon? Jacobs asked – the geologist did not respond, only laughed. Paul Jacobs and his wife died from cancer within 90 days.

•Lee Gelvani claims to have almost convinced James Irwin, an Apollo 15 astronaut whom Gelvani referred to as an “informant”, to confess about a cover-up having occurred. Irwin was supposedly going to contact Kaysing about it; however he died of a heart attack in 1991, before any such telephone call occurred. Spacecraft testing and flying high performance jet aircraft can be dangerous, and all but one of the astronaut deaths (Irwin’s) were directly related to their rather hazardous job. Two of the astronauts, Mike Adams and Robert Lawrence, had no connection with the civilian manned space program. Astronaut James Irwin had suffered several heart attacks in the years prior to his death. There is no independent confirmation of Gelvani’s claim that Irwin was about to come forward. Moreover, if there was a coverup (that the Apollo 11 and subsequent landings were faked), the coverup would logically have occurred in 1969 and subsequent years – yet all of the deaths listed above occurred in 1967 or earlier.

Copy and WIN : http://ow.ly/KNICZ

****

10 Dead NASA astronauts, 1964-67

On 27 January 1967, two years before the first moon landing, Virgil “Gus” Grissom, Ed White and Roger Chaffee were killed in a devastating fire on the Apollo 1 launchpad during a full scale launch simulation. Grissom was greatly liked by his peers, was a strong character, and occupied a central position in the NASA space program. Many had predicted that it would be Grissom who would be the first to walk on the moon.

But Grissom was also an outspoken critic of the program. Among his last words before he died, when there was a communications failure with the capsule just prior to the fire, were: “How are we going to get to the moon when we can’t communicate between two buildings?”

Moments later, the capsule burst into flames with the astronauts sealed inside. They were consumed by the fire with no chance to escape. His widow Betty and his son Scott both still maintain that the astronauts were killed deliberately by sabotage – and that their many questions have never been adequately answered.

Clark McClelland and John Lear insist that there was also a fourth astronaut who died in the capsule, a member of an alternative space program… the “real” one, employing top secret advanced technology, which was highly classified. After the fire, according to McClelland and Lear, a heavy cover-up ensued that continues to this day. (Please see Project Camelot’s interview with John Lear for more details. Lear states that the fourth astronaut’s name is known.)

Thomas Ronald Baron was a safety inspector in Apollo 1’s construction. After the fire, Baron testified before Congress that the Apollo program was in such disarray that the United States would never make it to the moon. He claimed his opinions made him a target, and on 21 April 1967 reported on camera to news reporters that he and his wife had been harassed at home. As part of his testimony Baron submitted a 500 page report detailing his findings. Exactly one week after he testified, Baron’s car was struck by a train and he, his wife and his stepdaughter were all killed instantly. Baron’s report mysteriously disappeared, and to this day it has never been found.

The Apollo program continued, and so did the string of untimely deaths. Between the years of 1964 and 1967 a total of 10 astronauts lost their lives in freak accidents. These deaths accounted for an astonishing 15% of NASA’s astronaut corps.

Apollo 1 Astro-nots praying over Apollo Command Module…why?

“How are we going to get to the moon if we can’t talk between two buildings?” Ed Grissom, Apollo 1

The issue of mysterious and untimely deaths also plagues the moon shots. Were whistle-blowers silenced? The January 1967 death of Gus Grissom, along with Ed White and Roger Chaffee in the Apollo 1 fire, is a possibility. One of the more prominent debunkers of the “we-never-went-to-the-moon” crowd has published his “disgust” that Bill Kaysing would suggest that Gus Grissom was murdered in order to silence him.

Who else makes such a “disgusting” claim? Grissom’s wife and son do. They both believe that the Apollo 1 fire was no accident, and that the truth is being covered up. They have evidence that such a notion might be true, and Grissom’s son Scott is calling for an official investigation into the matter as of 2002. Grissom was critical of NASA, hanging a lemon on a NASA simulator before he died.

People associated with the Apollo 1 simulation on the day of the fire remarked on the strange atmosphere that prevailed. Grissom told his wife that if somebody died in an “accident,” it would likely be him, and not because he was accident prone. Straight-talking Grissom apparently made the NASA brass uneasy with his observations. During the Apollo 1 simulation, just before he died, the communications with the Command Module completely broke down, and Grissom said in exasperation, “How are we going to get to the moon if we can’t talk between two buildings?”

Lola Morrow was the astronauts’ secretary. On the show Moon Shot she can be heard describing the atmosphere on the morning of the fire. She described the mood of Grissom, White and Chaffee as one she had never seen before. Before each flight and major event, the astronauts were eager to get to it. Not that day. They obviously did not want to do the simulation.

Clark MacDonald, an engineer working for McDonnell-Douglas, was hired by NASA to investigate the fire. He now has admitted that more than thirty years earlier, NASA destroyed the evidence he gathered, as well as the report he produced, for “public relations” reasons. MacDonald determined that an electrical short started the fire when the battery power was switched on. Grissom’s son Scott was granted access to the Apollo 1 craft, where he gathered evidence that he says pointed to sabotage, and that there has been a cover-up of it. (Source)

Grissom’s death (taking White and Chaffee with him) is not the only strange one. Bill Kaysing thinks that another man was silenced by murder. Thomas Baron was an inspector for North American Rockwell, the contractor that built the Command Module. The astronauts are united in the opinion that what Rockwell produced was of initially poor quality. The astronauts comment on it in Moon Shot.

Baron was not an engineer, and only had a high school education, but was the detail-oriented fanatic that all technical organizations need. His pals gave him the initials “DR,” which stood for discrepancy report. His supervisor ran out of discrepancy report forms regularly, because Baron used so many of them. He was the squeaky wheel. He made some of his findings public, and Rockwell fired him about three weeks before the Apollo 1 fire. Baron originally produced a fifty-five-page report, and finished a 500-page report that he delivered when he testified to Congress in April of 1967.

His testimony received a hostile reception. A few days later he was dead. His car was struck by a train, killing not only himself, but also his wife and stepdaughter. In shades of Casolaro and Wilcher, his death was officially ruled a suicide. It was worse than that, because he did not only “kill” himself, but also murdered his wife and her child. It took some interesting psychology to arrive at that conclusion, going from being overly conscientious to becoming a murderer.

One theory is that he was distraught over the Apollo 1 fire, so he killed himself and his family. I have not heard about anybody else connected to the Apollo program killing themselves or becoming murderers over the Apollo 1 “accident.” How strange that the biggest whistleblower did. Just what are those odds? The 500-page report disappeared, and has not been seen since.

The moon hoax debunkers have lined up behind the official explanation. Jay Windley thinks that Barons’ report has come up missing partly because it had little investigative value, and that Baron may have indeed killed himself, but if he were murdered, it would have been a private contractor, not NASA, and if they wanted to silence him, they should have done it before he testified. Jay may be right, but I have encountered far too many conveniently timed deaths during my investigations to make my suspicion go away, especially when Grissom’s son thinks he was murdered.

Killing whistle-blowers such as Thomas Baron was standard operating procedure for the defense establishment, if it related to military matters. I know people who have been involved in Department of Defense whistle-blowing activities. It could get pretty scary. Sometimes, people would simply “disappear,” Jimmy Hoffa-style.

When billions of dollars are at stake, murdering a few people with “big mouths” or who otherwise stand in the way is standard activity. That is the nature of American-style capitalism. Why should it be different regarding space matters? I was challenged to provide some evidence of what I know about whistle-blowers, and without naming names, this footnote presents a little of what I am aware of.[62]

James Irwin was an Apollo 15 astronaut. He became a Born Again Christian, leading an effort to find Noah’s Ark. According to what I have read and heard, in 1991, Irwin contacted Kaysing to have a chat. Why would Irwin call a “kook” such as Kaysing? Four days after allegedly trying to contact Kaysing, Irwin was dead from a heart attack. Did “Born Again” Irwin want to unburden his conscience? Irwin had heart disease, so that may explain it, but the spooks can apparently induce heart attacks using normally undetectable means. ”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

10 Proofs the Earth is Not a Globe

10 Proofs the Earth is Not a Globe

Note: Sometimes you only have a short time to talk to people. It could be because they are busy, or they are not interested, or they have a short attention span – which is often the case, sadly to say. So, here are 10 “sound bites” you can say.

Proof The Earth Is Not Flat

Before you debate a flat earth believer, you have to know what they believe in to debate him. Here are just 10 of the many reasons why why believe in a flat earth. Then, you have to be able to disprove it. IF you can’t, well then…you might have to change your beliefs.

The following is a verbatim copy of A hundred proofs the Earth is Not a Globe by William Carpenter (1885).

1 The aeronaut can see for himself that Earth is a Plane. The appearance presented to him, even at the highest elevation he has ever attained, is that of a concave surface – this being exactly what is to be expected of a surface that is truly level, since it is the nature of level surfaces to appear to rise to a level with the eye of the observer. This is ocular demonstration and proof that Earth is not a globe.

2 Whenever experiments have been tried on the surface of standing water, this surface has always been found to be level. If the Earth were a globe, the surface of all standing water would be convex. This is an experimental proof that Earth is not a globe.

3 Surveyors’ operations in the construction of railroads, tunnels, or canals are conducted without the slightest “allowance” being made for “curvature,” although it is taught that this so-called allowance is absolutely necessary! This is a cutting proof that Earth is not a globe.

4 There are rivers that flow for hundreds of miles towards the level of the sea without falling more than a few feet – notably, the Nile, which, in a thousand miles, falls but a foot. A level expanse of this extent is quite incompatible with the idea of the Earth’s “convexity.” It is, therefore, a reasonable proof that Earth is not a globe.

5 The lights which are exhibited in lighthouses are seen by navigators at distances at which, according to the scale of the supposed “curvature” given by astronomers, they ought to be many hundreds of feet, in some cases, down below the line of sight! For instance: the light at Cape Hatteras is seen at such a distance (40 miles) that, according. to theory, it ought to be nine-hundred feet higher above the level of the sea than it absolutely is, in order to be visible! This is a conclusive proof that there is no “curvature,” on the surface of the sea – “the level of the sea,”- ridiculous though it is to be under the necessity of proving it at all: but it is, nevertheless, a conclusive proof that the Earth is not a globe.

6 If we stand on the sands of the sea-shore and watch a ship approach us, we shall find that she will apparently “rise” – to the extent, of her own height, nothing more. If we stand upon an eminence, the same law operates still; and it is but the law of perspective, which causes objects, as they approach us, to appear to increase in size until we see them, close to us, the size they are in fact. That there is no other “rise” than the one spoken of is plain from the fact that, no matter how high we ascend above the level of the sea, the horizon rises on and still on as we rise, so that it is always on a level with the eye, though it be two-hundred miles away, as seen by Mr. J. Glaisher, of England, from Mr. Coxwell’s balloon. So that a ship five miles away may be imagined to be “coming up” the imaginary downward curve of the Earth’s surface, but if we merely ascend a hill such as Federal Hill, Baltimore, we may see twenty-!five miles away, on a level with the eye – that is, twenty miles level distance beyond the ship that we vainly imagined to be ” rounding the curve,” and “coming up!” This is a plain proof that the Earth is not a globe.

7 If we take a trip down the Chesapeake Bay, in the day-time, we may see for ourselves the utter fallacy of the idea that when a vessel appears “hull down,” as it is called, it is because the hull is “behind the water:” for, vessels, have been seen, and may often be seen – again, presenting the appearance spoken of, and away – far away – beyond those vessels, and, at the same moment, the level shore line, with its accompanying complement of tall trees towering up, in perspective, over the heads of the “hull-down” ships! Since, then, the idea will not stand its ground when the facts rise up against it, and it is a piece of the popular theory, the theory is a contemptible piece of business, and we may easily wring from it a proof that Earth is not a globe.

8 If the Earth were a globe, a small model globe would be the very best – because the truest – thing for the. navigator to take to sea with him. But such a thing as that is not known: with such a toy as a guide, the mariner would wreck his ship, of a certainty!, This is a proof that Earth is not a globe.

9 As mariners take to sea with them charts constructed as though the sea were a level surface, however these charts may err as to the true form of this level surface taken as a whole, it is clear, as they find them answer their purpose tolerably well – and only tolerably for many ships are wrecked owing to the error of which we speak – that the surface of the sea is as it is taken to be, whether the captain of the ship “supposes” the Earth to be a globe or anything else. Thus, then, we draw, from the common system of “plane sailing,” a practical proof that Earth is not a globe.

10 That the mariners’ compass points north and south at the same time is a fact as indisputable as that two and two makes four; but that this would be impossible if the thing, were placed on a globe with “north” and “south’ at the centre of opposite hemispheres is a fact that does not figure in the school-books, though very easily seen: and it requires no lengthy train of reasoning to bring out of it a pointed proof that the Earth is not a globe.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

US Navy CGI Photo of UFO

US Navy CGI Photo of UFO

The latest news is that the US Navy supposedly video taped a UFO over the ocean. This appeared on Yahoo News. Guess what? The video did not play in my region and the photo that went with the article looked like a painting, though it might have been a CGI. Is this the best the government can do to convince their citizens? I guess so. This might be a test to see how dumb people are. They figure since the people believe all the news about Covid, let’s see what cheesy pictures we can get away with on UFOs!

Another news items is that China supposedly landed a craft on Mars. I guess some graphic artist is busy at Mission Control!

Click Here to see the article.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 2 Comments

A Talk About The Spinning Earth

A Talk About The Spinning Earth

two guys talking 1

Richard talks to John about some basic physics and says that things just don’t add up.

Richard: Hi John, how are you doing?

John: Fine, thanks, and you?

Richard: Good. What I would like to discuss is some basic physics that just doesn’t make sense. I mean, I know physics, but there are some areas that just doesn’t add up.

John: What do you mean?

Richard: These are simple questions and you might think they are stupid but it’s a good point to start.

You can feel my breath, right?

John: Of course, if you breath on me hard enough.

Richard: you can jump and land in same spot, right?

John: Of course.

Richard: Birds can fly insects can fly, planes can take off, fly and land. What happens if you step down on a moving platform going 10mph?

John: I’d fall.

Richard: What if it was moving 100mph?

John: Fall fast and hard.

Richard: You confirm that all is true. How do you know it’s true? Because you can feel it; this validates your reality, right?

John: Yes. But where are you going with all this?

Richard: Just hold on. Now, we are told the earth spins 1,000mph at equator right? Do you believe that?

John: Yes.

Richard: Why?

John: Because I was told.

Richard: But what about your senses? If that is true, why don’t we feel it?

John: Because we are told it’s gravity

Richard: If it’s gravity, everything would have to be moving in sync: air, objects, etc. That is what we are told by physics professors. Remember, that is what we are told.

IF this is true, why can you feel my breath?

It’s part of gravity, we are told.

John agreed with this.

Richard: If it is, why does gravity effect all air molecules but not what you breath out? How can a bird fly against such heavy wind? How can a plane land on ground that is going 1,000mph? And do so in a different direction without crashing?

John: That means the plane would have to be going at exactly the same speed as the planet.

Richard: Then how can it land on a N S runway while the earth is spinning towards the East?

Do you believe the earth is spinning because you see the Sun moving over head?

John: Yes.

Richard: Have you ever thought that it’s the Sun MOVING and not the earth?

If I went to some tribe in the Amazon that never saw modern civilization. We look up and a plane is moving across the sky. What would he say?

John: Probably that the plane is moving.

Richard: If I told him the ground is moving, would be believe that?

John: We don’t know, but he might believe it.

Richard: If I told him over and over again that the plane is not moving but the earth, he most probably would believe it. But we know that it’s not earth moving but the plane. If he asks why then does the plane move out of view, we could say that is because the earth, which is round, is moving from his view.

We know that the plane is moving and not the earth because we have been in the plane; we can see it move across the ground very fast and see it take off from the ground. But what if we never saw that? What if we keep hearing that the earth is moving and not the plane? What if we were told since a child to always believe the teachers, the media and government? You would believe them when you hear their explanation that is opposite of what they were told? You would have no question that they were lying; you could not possible think that such smart people made a mistake.

So, we see the Sun move across the sky and believe that it’s actually the earth moving. Maybe we believe all this because we were told this! And, from our standpoint it also makes sense, so we don’t question it. But if you were flying along side the Sun you would have a different perspective, right?

John: I presume so.

Richard: Have you ever seen how far the Sun is actually from the earth? If you just put aside your beliefs for a moment so you can follow along. What if I told you that you could fly to the altitude of the Sun, and you followed along. You’ll see the earth still but only the Sun moving. What I’m saying is, that you get a different perspective.

Now, back to the air molecules in perfect sync with the earth’s spinning and that is why you don’t feel it and why nothing is destroyed by the fast movement of the earth. Tell me, how is it that ALL the air molecules are in perfect sync with the spinning – which we are told by professors – but someone how, our little breath we can blow air on someone next to us and they feel it. How is it that the force, gravity or whatever you call it can not equally effect air molecules, insects flying or leaves blowing?

John: I don’t know. This is confusing.

Richard: If you believe what you are told about gravity and air molecules in perfect sync with the spinning AND you believe that you can feel the air from someone’s breath – they are contradictory to each other. If one is true, the other can’t be. If you believe both are true, do you know what you call that?

John: No.

Cognitive Dissonances, which means: holding both beliefs are that are opposite of each other and believing both are true. This is cognitive dissonance. That is not a sign of a stable mind.

To help you some more. The one we were only told. The other, actually feel it and can test it. So, which do you believe?

John: That’s a difficult question, I have to think on that one awhile.

Richard: Good. The next time lets continue the talk, OK?

John: Fine.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Flat Earth In Old Newspapers, Sample 1

Flat Earth In Old Newspapers, Sample 1

I thought you might like to see some old flat earth articles. You might have to zoom in to 125% to be able to read it. All these articles are fascinating, but the arguments by critics are much the same as they are today.

Click to access fe-old-newspaper-1.pdf

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Flat Earth Videos Taken Down

Liars Are In Control

Here is proof that liars are in control. Now, some people might say it’s circumstantial evidence but when you have enough of this, it points that liars are in control. I went back to the old videos that were once online on YouTube and they are no longer there. You can do a check yourself and see messages such as: “This account is closed,” or simply, “video no longer available,” or something that says it’s in violation of “Community standards.” Now, why would the owner close his own account (for those that state that). If they believe in what they put up, why close it? And, it doesn’t cost any money to keep your channel, even if you have no activity. It’s not like you stopped paying for your web hosting and your account is closed. YouTube is free. But we all know the answer to this and that is – politically correctness has reached anything that has to do with the flat earth.

Truth does not need to be censored. If we are wrong, and they are right (globe earth believers), they would encourage such videos and articles to be online – so they can debate us. The “guardians of the press” would want to debate us to show how we are wrong. But they don’t, because they can’t debate us. The most that they do is, they say what we say, and we said nothing of the sort; they take what we said out of context or completely lie about it.

It is flat earth believers who are ready and willing to debate them but they turn down the offer. The same goes for many other topics that are classified, such as: politically incorrect, racist, phobic of some sort, nationalist and Christian. Now, there are some flat earthers that might believe in all this political correctness but they should re-examine their position. The lying is systemic and they (government, media, education) lie on every subject where they can control or hurt us in some way. The biggest thing that they lie about is this covid nonsense. I don’t want to talk too much about that here as thousands have already been de-platform. And, CFEM is not on a private paid hosting site where it would be harder to be banned.

The only place you can talk at length about certain topics, like covid is: on a paid for hosting website (and that is problematic) and on alternative social media sites. Some alternative social media sites are: minds.com, usa.life, bitchute.com, etc. I do have a group of flat earthers on usa.life by the way.

I’m sure the topic of flat earth is in the cross-hair of being banned. Why? Because, when people realize that they have been lied to about the nature of the earth, it will lead people to question other topics that they were lied to. In short, they will learn the truth in areas that are deemed “politically incorrect.” Learning about the flat earth will lead people to believe in God of the Bible. From there, they will learn that we should live by God’s laws – which the churches dare not talk about because they have fallen for the lie many years ago. Now, when people learn that the laws of the land should be what we should live by – this will be the downfall of the Beast System. And, the Beast System know it.

Why do you think that the main enemy in the Soviet Union were Christians? Why do you think that millions were in prison and millions more died? Because as a true Christian people worshipped God and not the State. This, the State could not have. Russian Orthodox people also believe in biblical laws and this would end the Beast System that was set up back in 1917.

Christian churches of all denominations have bought the lie of not to say anything against the world system and this has been going on for many generations.

“So, where do you find the truth on this topic?”

Just do a search on Christian Identity or Christian Identity Church. This a loose group of pastors and individuals who believe in the Bible and are not afraid to preach against “the powers that be.”

When you do your search on Google, you’ll find that only links that are hateful about CI show up. This is expected from Google, as their algorithms are politically based, not scientifically based. So, do your search on an alternative search engine – which actually gives you the results that you type in. Such as, duckduckgo.com

When you compare the two search engines – you’ll see that the liars are in control. And this goes for any “controversial” topic that you type it. Why should there be a difference if all algorithms are accurate? Well, they are not – as Google and others like them change it when it comes to topics like this, including the flat earth.

In conclusion, continue your search for truth no matter where it leads you.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 8 Comments

The Earth’s Rhythmical Breathing

The Earth’s Rhythmical Breathing

A surprising scientific discovery

(Flat earth believers know that the the moon does not cause tides. Though this article attributed the tides to the moon, it did reveal something that is not told today – namely, that the earth ‘rises and falls.’ This supports what we are told in the Bible that the earth came out of the water. I find this article interesting reading and hope you do, too.

Spelling is as is in the original article.)

The following paragraph was cut from The Leicester Daily Post, Aug. 25th, and sent us by a correspondent who asks: “Does not this support the view that the earth is a plane floating on the mighty ocean?” The paragraph was headed as above reads:

We all know that there are oceans tides, spring and neap, and they are due to the positions of the sun and moon relatively to the earth. “The full of the moon” strikingly affoots the sea. It did not occur to us to think whether it also affected the atmosphere and the earth itself. All that was notice about it, apart from its marine influence, was that the persons of unstrung nerves underwent crises at the full of the moon. Then so-called scientific men laughed at this belief, as being in the nature of old wives’ fables. But being founded on observation it was nothing of the sort. M. Bouquet de la Graye, an eminent hydrographical engineer, has, after long years of patient study, calculated the atmospheric expansions and depressions which coincide with the spring and neap tides. There have been cases in which air was moved in waves of 133 years high, and in places where the barometrical pressure was seven-tenths of an inch, of six and a half miles. Near the upper surface of the earth’s atmosphere condensations and dilatations of this magnitude are frequent. The human nervous system may be said to register these air waves. We are only aware they do so by the discomfort which we feel. The earth also registers them, and to its very centre. The incandescent and fluid matter under the earth’s crust acts in concert with the air and sea at the full of the moon. In 1890 a German scientist, Dr. Rebeur Pachwitz, thought he notice at Wilhelm-shaven and Potsdam earth oscillations corresponding with the course of the moon. He wrote to the Observatory of Teneriffe asking for observations to be made there in December, 1890, and April 1891, which would be propitious times for them. From these observations, and others simultaneously made in the sandy plains round Berlin, it was established that the earth rises and falls like the ocean and the atmosphere. The movements, common to them all, may be likened to that of the chest in breathing. – Paris correspondent, “Weekly Despatch.”

To the above question we reply, Yes! Certainly. Parallax, in his excellent work, entitled Earth Not A Globe, shows that the tides are caused by rhythmical rising and falling of the earth as it rests upon the sea, and not by any alterations in the absolute height of water. This explanation was so simple that the scientists scoffed at it; but now after an acknowledged “scientist” has discovered what was already known to Zetetics it is called “A surprising Scientific Discovery.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Creatures from Space Hoax

Creatures from Space Hoax

Creature from spaceThere is a lot of talk about Aliens from space. In fact, in Yahoo News they resurrected an old news item about a miniature Alien body found, as was reported by Dr. Steven Geer in his “documentary” Sirius. If you seen the photo of the supposed extraterrestrial, I noticed some strange things:

The uniform brass color

How the upper leg bone differs from the other one

The flat of “skull” bone over the other half

In short, the whole things looks like something that is made.

Though the Yahoo article did not call it Alien, it did say that it was a real life “person.”

The following article came from another Christian website. I left it here intact.

The following simple enumerated outline (updated here a little for the website’s sake) has come in handy many times for me now in just the past year or two having been sent out to many who had strongly believed in space aliens, and once I had politely sent it I usually didn’t hear much back from them afterwards on the subject (as they obviously had no good rebuttals):

It seems it will be endlessly speculated by the “less seasoned” believers till the day the Messiah arrives: “Is there life outside our little blue marble?”

Well, let’s first look at four reasons why the luciferians want us to believe such a thing, and work from there.

1. The NASA space exploration funding needs to continue, regardless of the tragic accidents, the overspending, and the misuse we have already dealt with in this tax-based program, why? Because the exploration is not so much about “exploring space” as it is to utilize the characteristics of zero gravity, low earth radio wave interferences, etc etc, to quietly continue their technological advancement techniques whereby they are more easily capable of further enslaving us, by possessing much more sophisticated weaponry than we ourselves can develop, etc. If we didn’t have a great portion of our population filled with pipe dreams of Star Trek types of space utopia, the NASA budget would drop to near nothing for them.

2. Having never successfully landed men on the moon as they had portrayed themselves doing back in the sixties and seventies (due mostly to the scientific fact of the phenomenon of the Van Allen radiation belts), they needed to cover up the serious secrecy at area 51 where it sure seems those landings were actually filmed to dupe us as into believing that they had truly done this. It was also then conveniently let spread that space aliens had crashed nearby and it was so traumatic and fearful to know, that the government had to keep it “classified” because “Americans would not be able to handle such things just yet.” (Yeah, right) (Why do you not suppose that every single astronaut had to be a very high [33rd degree] Freemason to be granted such a prestigious status of a United States astronaut…huh? They were sworn to absolute satanic secrecies my friends, that’s why ! Have you seen the recent YouTube video clips where these older astronauts are nervously confronted about these moon landings and whether they really took place?)

3. They also need to keep us fearful, and now they must do so in a global sense since the cold war is over and especially since “the war on terror” is crumbling in on them. They are running out of “bogey men”. If we fear that there may be a coming threat of attacking space aliens, we would be much more willing to lovingly accept global governance, expecting that “we might all have to fight together to save the planet” (or some other imaginative story like that).

But last (and definitely not least)…

4. They want very much to keep us as far away from trusting in a literal understanding of YHWH’s holy word as possible, and this for two reasons:

A) they can’t stand the thought of being responsible to a Holy God themselves (which is why many of them even worship the dark side of the Bible’s “Molech” at Bohemian grove, etc) and,

B) they know that people who truly understand and trust the Bible and its law and justice system… simply don’t make very good slaves.

Now, those are the political aspects one should first understand, but more importantly, the Bible makes some interesting points to ponder:

1. Those who claim to be “Christians” but also believe in “extraterrestrials” are often devout “theistic evolutionists” as well, where they believe that our Creator YHWH somehow had to have the help of ‘time’, to create all that he created. In essence they say that their god had to have time to create a bluebird after he created the cardinal (think about how ridiculous that sounds). Nonetheless therefore: Was the earth really created in six literal days? Well, according to the very same global elitist luciferians who educate us now (with their somewhat recent lie of “evolution”), they say, “no”. They say it took millions or even billions of years. What do we then do with all of the unpublicized science that proves certain verifiable “age limiting factors” for the earth? These are things that they won’t show you on television or in schools, such as how the moon is drifting away from the earth, the absence of a delta at the mouth of the Colorado river, or Puloniam halos whose half life data, along with many other similar facts prove that the earth is at best, less than thirty thousand years old (just to name a few)?

If folks are “believers” and still want to ‘marry’ the six day creation to those “millions of years”, and the six days were somehow much longer periods of time… then what did those poor plants do for example that were created on day three, waiting for that sunlight to come around a few million years later on day four? There’s the hard to ignore need to also study “symbiosis” my friends, which is the science of interaction between all of the plants and critters of creation!

This evolution lie can be a whole wonderful area to explore in and of itself, and if one would wish to dig deeper, I would send them to my website http://www.bcmin.us and the “Creation series” videos that have all the facts and details right there where they can later debate me on any or all of those points if they should so choose to do so responsibly.

2. Many will turn to passages in the Bible like Genesis 6:4 where it says, “there were giants in the earth in those days”, where they somehow use their imaginations that “aha ! This must mean big alien creatures !!!” No, the Strong’s Hebrew dictionary for the original King James word “giant” means: “a feller, that is, a bully or tyrant” (look it up yourself, it was showing that they were up against something very much like what we are up against today: a group of thugs). “Giant” meant big in oppresive power my friends, not so much as if it were some huge six-nosed green guy from planet Xenu! In fact, keep in mind that we have found in our own research herejust recently that the “violence” that Father was upset about just before the flood of Noah’s time seemed to be non-physical in nature as well, as the Hebrew for that word in Genesis 6:11,13 (Strong’s # H2555) means: which in the Websters 1828 dictionary means “a trope” or the changing of words (wordsmithing or – ahem… “legalese”?).

3. Father’s Bible also speaks only of angels and man. Any other types of references are desperate departures from scripture (and I believe) only support the weak believer’s internal purposes of hoping that somebody else can save us that won’t be as strict as this “sin-hating God” that we have now. Know what I mean? These are “Christians” that want the best of both worlds. They want their sin and eat it too, and the God of the Bible therefore is not their favorite superhero in this respect.

There can be much added to this, but for this study, enough said that faith in God is not also faith in space aliens.

Blessings with peace to all men (er, earthmen that is),

Dwaine Moore

ALIENS DEBUNKED

For Review

I believe that I posted the video below but since we are on the topic, it’s appropriate to post it here.

For those who still think that the History channel is reputable…

Try this amazingly clear debunking of a History Channel documentary on Ancient Aliens:

(Side note: I disagree with their take on the Nephilim section near the end of this video, but in a way that still agrees that it was not “aliens”, where this is an understandable area of disagreement among the more serious Bible scholars and I don’t fault them for perhaps not yet having found the research that some others of us have found on that topic that gives it an even less “weird” look as they say that part of the Bible has (where my view agrees with the 400-year old writings of the commentary writer Matthew Henry as well by the way). Here’s a short version of my difference that also now easily fits today’s global events, paralleling Noah’s time with our end times’ prophecy fulfillment as well:

As a side note, flat earther Rob Skiba is pushing the nephilim and giants but he has a different take on it. However, just consider the following…

Certain Hebrew words we are finding in Scripture seem to be clearly indicating that what we are seeing today, are conditions that are almost exactly what I feel had been causing the “violence” that Father was upset about in the book of Genesis and had chosen to destroy mankind over in Noah’s day as well. (see Strong’s: nephilim means: bully, feller, tyrant, and even technically before it could mean a literal, physical “giant”). In other words, they were more possibly also up against “tyrannical conspirators” or “big bullies” in their time just as we are now, and… under such oppression via “legalese” word-craft deception (keep in mind that the Hebrew word for “violence” in Genesis 6:11 means “wrong by metonymy” or the wrongful art of word craft; oppression through injustice or unjust gain). …and not so much due to any real physical strength of their own as previously thought (although a larger size could certainly have been a part of it as well, simultaneously). Is this not exactly what they are doing to us as well today, in the media, churches and courts etc? Using word games and mind control in an illusion of overpowering strength (global “corporate giants”), intimidating mostly through the art of fear and word-craft or “legalese”? Also: “sons of God” were simply the way of saying “the righteous”, and “sons of men” were simply how the Bible worded “the wicked” in Genesis chapter 6, which would also nicely parallel Noah’s corrupt overlords and their inbred freakishness with our time’s Rothschild-inbred freakishness, etc.

I have many times suggested to folks to just pitch their entire cable-connected television sets out the window (due to how the entire cable programming circuit is corrupted to defile the image of the Bible in mankind) but many always say, “I only watch the History Channel or the Discovery Channel”, where I then must sit them down in pity and have to break it to them that some of the bigger lies come from those very sources (as the above debunking video will show), as these specific “channels” endlessly portray themselves as being almost sacredly scientific, academically rock-solid, and reliable, building themselves up only to do that very thing, which is to get the bigger myths that they want to purport into the minds of the uneducated, especially in the areas of decoying people away from a belief in the Bible. (Remember: People who know and live by their Bibles don’t make very good slaves.)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 6 Comments

Fake World Reality Part 2 (Proof that Earth is Not Spinning, Rotating, Revolving or Wobbling)

Fake World Reality Part 2 (Proof that Earth is Not Spinning, Rotating, Revolving or Wobbling)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Core Issue That Is Never Mentioned

The Core Issue That Is Never Mention By Most Truth Seekers

Have you notice that those who are big in the alternative media and knows about the covid conspiracy and other such topics – not one of them touch on the core issue. That is – while we are having these troubles in the first place and how to get out of it. Yet, they call themselves Christians. If they only read the Bible they would know. To sum it all up, if they just read Deuteronomy chapter 28. The whole Bible is repeats that theme – of why we have the problems and why the enemy is against us. It’s because of our disobedience, our sin. If the people just repent, change their ways, turn to God, wait on Him – THEN He will heal our land and our bodies. This is the secret weapon that we should use. It’s secret in that most people don’t know about it, yet it’s no secret because it’s in the most popular book that ever sold. That is why the Edomites hate Christianity, as the formula for their destruction in right in the Bible. We will not see victory until the people do that; we will not see Christ coming with a Sword and with the Host of Heaven until we turn to Him. Remember, Christ said He will not come with peace but with a sword. It’s only afterwards will the sword be turned into a ploughshare – as there will be no need for it, there will be no sin.

Deuteronomy 28 is so important that it is mentioned twice, in the book of Leviticus, word for word.

Think of this, one of the sins is against usury/interest. If the people woke up to this sin and only this sin, they would have more prosperity. But if they ignored the rest, look at how terrible it would be. Sure, the people would more money, be debt free and so would corporations and governments, but guess what? The people will have more money to engage in their lying, stealing, perversions and addictions. So, stopping all sin is the key.

How can the government stop us than? How can they stop us from praying in our homes? They can’t and that is what they are afraid of. But we don’t hear this from people who are suppose to be leaders in the patriotic movement know. However this is what will need to happen as that is what scripture says.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment