Covert hypnosis, mind control techniques, PSYOPs used daily to manipulate you

Mind control and the flat earth

hollywood flat earth  In order to get the public to continue to believe in the lie of a heliocentric universe, all sorts of techniques are used. The Elite have this down to a science.

This has been quite a feat, given the rugged individualism that was the hallmark of early America. But it is obviously working. Americans are largely sheeple, cooperatively allowing the mass media, government propaganda and corporate marketing machines to determine what is right, true and fashionable.

The only defense is education. If you are not aware of the covert processes used to infiltrate your subconscious mind, then you are much more likely to fall prey to them.

Were you aware that US government operatives know how to use hypnosis to induce trance, provoke an average person to commit murder, then forget that it happened? This process has been documented as part of the government’s effort to create a real Jason Bourne-like operative. Of course, experiments were secretly forced upon healthy yet vulnerable citizens and mental hospital patients, but that is another story.

Find out more at CLICK HERE.

Posted in Conspiracies | Tagged | Leave a comment

What is Man?

The Earth

Issue 39-40

1903

Note: The choice of words, grammar and spelling is kept as in the original.

A “Development” or a Creation?

Christ-Ozarks-2In conclusion we ought at least briefly to notice this ancient and important question. It is strictly germane to the subject yet Mr. W., I find, ignores it as a question, and quietly assumes throughout his article the unproven doctrine of human “development,” or evolution. Of course the globular theory and the evolution theory go together; they are, so to speak, cousins germane. Every evolutionist as a matter of fact is a globite or globularist; and every globite ought in consistency to be a believer in evolution. Some evolutionists stop with the physical evolution; but others, more consistent, carry the doctrine into the realm of spirit, or “mind” as well as matter.

Mr. Wallace seems to be of the latter class. As a theosophist he evidently believes in the natural immortality of the soul or spirit; which he would call the “man.” Whereas the Bible, agreeable to the facts of everyday experience, everywhere teaches that man, the real material man, though in temporary possession of “spirit” is mortal by reason of sin. At the same it sets before man “the blessed hope of eternal life” as the gift of God through our Lord Jesus the Christ. That splendid reasoner, Paul, clearly sets forth this doctrine as the peculiarity of the Gospel of Christ. He says that to them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory, honour, and IMMORTALITY God will render, or give, Eternal Life (Rom. ii. 7). A man does not “seek” for that which he thinks he is already in possession of; and so the theosophist, with others who may have unconsciously imbibed this pagan doctrine, refuse to come to the Christ that they may have this eternal Life (John v. 40).

The theosophist, moreover, not only imagines that his individual immortality will reach into the unending future, but he also believes that it has come down through millions of years from the dim and eternal past. In fact he claims that man is a sort of lesser god, that he does not surely die, but is slowly progressing through dreary ages, cycles, and re-incarnations towards a greater godship. Thus they not only deny the Creation as described in the Word of God, but they dethrone the Creator of the world as revealed therein; while they blindly accept the delusive promise, “Ye shall be as gods knowing both good and evil.” This phase of the subject is carefully concealed from the general reader, but it comes out near the end of the article under review. Mr. W. says that such thinkers as himself “believe that we ourselves are the SOLE and sufficient result” of the forces of this self-evolved universe. What is this but saying that men by “development” are, or may become, the only gods in existence. Thus belief in a fictitious universe leads men to set fictitious values upon their own individualities. Nature knows no such values, as many often be seen by its wholesale destruction of life both by flood and by fire; and the Bible, ever faithful to the facts of nature, and our own personal experiences, shows that because of Sin, Death at present reigns in the world; and that, at present, the Son of God “only hath immortality” (I Tim. vi. 16).

Man’s place in Nature is therefore that of a creature – a creature formed out of the dust and liable to return thereto (Gen. iii. 19). But the Gospel of the Christ comes with the glorious hope of a new Life, a new birth by a Resurrection (not a “re-incarnation”) from the dead. Compare Dan. xii. 2, and John v. 28,29. And this priceless boon is offered to anyone who will honestly obey the reasonable and necessary conditions. “For God so loved the world (this one and only world) that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish but have EVERLASTING LIFE.” – John iii. 16. And whoever honestly reads the life record of this God Begotten Son must acknowledge that He is worthy of our faith and trust.

Thanks be to God for His unspeakable gift. May every true Zetetic strive to attain thereto.

ALBERT SMITH.

“Hatfield Villa,”

Gwendolen Road, Leicester. June, 1903.

Note: Make sure you watch for my next post on this subject (theosophist) and how it’s affecting society today.

Posted in Bible and Flat Earth | Tagged | Leave a comment

Facts Should Not Contradict Each Other

Heaven above 1

Taken from” The Earth” publication.

Hatfield Cottage, Gwendoline Road, Leicester, England.

Sept. 3rd, 1903

Dear Brother Aldridge,

I have to thank you for you letter, received on Sunday last, August 30th.

I do not deny that you have in the south a centre around which the southern stars revolve. If some Zetetic deny this is is because they have not yet seen the evidence for it. But as you know that the southern constellations revolve around a so-called “pole,” so we know that water everywhere is level, and the earth (or land, see Gen. I. 10) therefore a plane. If the earth were a globe, according to popular belief, the surface of all canals, rivers, and seas, would be convex.

It is as inconsistent of the globularist to deny that water is level as it would be of me to deny your evidence about the southern stars. Both are evidently facts, and no fact should be contradicted. The fact that water is level is utterly inconsistent with globular theory, but the motions of the heavenly bodies have, speaking generally, nothing to do with the shape of the surface of the earth. But you and I are both Christians, and we ought alike to respect the Word of the Creator. No part of the Bible can be more undoubtedly the Word of God than the Ten Commandments which God spake on Mount Sinai. In the Second Commandment “God said” that:

Heaven is “above,”

The earth “beneath,”

And the water “under the earth.”

Can you reconcile this with the whirling globe theory? Where is heaven on such a hypothesis? Shall we as Christians accept the teaching of God’s Word respecting his own Creation, or shall we accept the “hypothesis” of “science” falsely so-called?

We Zetetics hold to the plane-earth doctrine because it throws so much light on Scripture statements, and strengthens our faith generally in God’s Word: but I have publicly debated the question here on the basis of “science” along, and I have never yet met a man who could give me one irrefutable proof of the earth’s globularity, or its supposed awful motions. We know that all infidels stand on the side of the astronomers, because modern theoretical astronomy subverts Bible teaching. Where, then, should all Christians be found? Let us stand together on the side of God’s Word. You in the south could help us in the north; and we in the north may be able to help you in the south.

You say, “the sun moves apparently from east to west.” Why not believe the evidence of your senses, that is, that the sun does move? The Bible says the sun moves; and the same good book says that the earth is established so that “it cannot be moved.” Can you give me a proof that the earth moves as astronomers affirm? I would like to see such a proof.

There maybe, and I think there are, some difficulties still remaining on the Zetetic side; but one thing is certain, our teaching does not tend to subvert faith in the divine inspiration of the Bible.

I shall be glad to see your further photos. Please mark which way the stars revolve – your camera being of course pointed to the south.

With kindest regards, believe me, yours faithfully,

ALBERT SIMTH

Posted in flat earth discussion | Tagged | Leave a comment

View to Cuba from Jamaica

Jamaica-Cuba

The Earth

1903

My experience is contrary to what I was taught to believe, viz; that the earth is a globe. As a boy, in Jamaica, I used to ask my parents many questions about the earth; and my mother told me there were several points in Jamaica from which Cuba could be seen. Later I proved this to be true. In March, 1881, I went from Montego Bay to St. Ann’s Bay; some companions went with me up the hills, and the morning being bright and very clear, I saw two small sails standing out from the shore quite distinctly, about five miles off. Another sail was also visible, about 80 miles away, which I and my friends made out to be a barque leaving Cuba. This we saw with the naked eye.

One of my companions, a pilot boy, had a small telescope with a range of 40 miles, but on looking through the glass we cold not see these ships; so the owner of the telescope, whose turn it was to watch for ships, stayed until he was able to ascertain that the vessels were going to Kingston, Jamaica.

I would suggest a few causes which prevent anyone seeing a ship a great distance away, although water is level:

1 The nature of the atmosphere. 2 The capacity of our visual organs.

E. V. MULGRAVE.

Note: The distance from Jamaica to Cuba, using Montego Bay as the point to the closest land mass in Cuba is approximately 119 miles or 191 kilometres. This would be much to far to see if the earth was a globe.

I find it interesting in that this author gave the range in miles of how far the telescope could see. Today all you hear is how much power the telescope has.

Posted in Flat Earth Experiments | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Challenger Disaster in 1986

Challenger-disaster

It was this article that led me to the discovery of the flat earth (as it was on a flat earth site). This happened one year ago. The site that I was on was mainly focused on medical fraud but they had a link to another site with a statement about the 7 astroNOTS who were supposedly killed back in 1986. This news was a revelation to me, then the flat earth was even more.

As former CIA Director William Casey boasted (paraphrasing), “We will know when our control of the people is complete when everything that the the American people believe in is a lie.” Well, that day has come and it came a long time ago. There are many other lies that we have been told. Lies about: wars, government leaders (calling the good bad and the bad good), medical profession, economy, and on and on. Of course, the worst lie is about what they say about God and the Bible. Anyhow, let’s continue…

Challenger-astro-nots  The remains of the crew that were identifiable were returned to their families on April 29, 1986. Three of the crew members, Judith Resnik, Dick Scobee, and Capt. Michael J. Smith, were buried by their families at Arlington National Cemetery at individual grave sites. Mission Specialist Lt Col Ellison Onizuka was buried at the National Memorial Cemetery of the Pacific in Honolulu, Hawaii. Unidentified crew remains were buried communally at the Space Shuttle Challenger Memorial in Arlington on May 20, 1986.

Once a Flat Plane Truth is realized, one realizes it is All a Great Lie. All of it.

*****

At cluesforum.info, they have been uncovering more “inconvenient truths” for NASA as to the living Astro-nots, who alleged we’re killed in the alleged space shuttle Challenger disaster but are now found to be happily gainfully employed in colleges and jobs related to NASA.

***

Pick your favorite photoshop..err shot, provided by NASA Image of what the Challenger explosion in space looked like. They cannot both be a picture of the exact same event. (also, was it not a clear blue sky day?)

http://ethics.wikia.com/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Challenger_Disaster

http://www.cleveland.com/nation/index.ssf/2013/01/space_shuttle_challenger_disas.html

Back Story

The Space Shuttle Challenger disaster occurred on January 28, 1986, when the NASA Space Shuttle orbiter Challenger (OV-099) (mission STS-51-L) broke apart 73 seconds into its flight, leading to the deaths of its seven crew members, which included five NASA astronauts and two payload specialists. The spacecraft disintegrated over the Atlantic Ocean, off the coast of Cape Canaveral, Florida at 11:38 EST (16:38 UTC).

Approximately 17 percent of Americans witnessed the launch live because of the presence of Payload Specialist Christa McAuliffe, who would have been the first teacher in space. Media coverage of the accident was extensive: one study reported that 85 percent of Americans surveyed had heard the news within an hour of the accident.

IT’S EASIER TO FOOL PEOPLE THAN TO CONVINCE THEM THAT THEY HAVE BEEN FOOLED.” Mark Twain

Challenger-astro-nots-2  Judith Resnik was one of the astroNOTS that was “aboard” the Challenger rocket.

“RESNIK” name meaning:

Variant spelling of Jewish Reznik ‘ritual slaughterer’.

http://www.ancestry.com/name-origin?surname=resnik

Judith Arlene Resnik

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Resnik

http://www.law.yale.edu/faculty/JResnik.htm

http://www.brynmawr.edu/news/2006-03-16/resnick.shtml

They are just pulling a fast one over the goyim.

“When the Shuttle Columbia disintegrated over a 800 mile stretch of Texas and Louisiana during its re-entry to Earth, it was traveling at over 8,000 MPH. From California to Florida in less than 15 minutes.

All bodies were recovered. ALL. They found enough of the space shuttle to rebuild most of it during their investigation. Compare this to when Flight 93 crashed, there should have been almost 300 tons of debris along with 10 tons of human remains. But they recovered no debris or body parts, whatsoever.”) hmm.

Seems strange, doesn’t it?

Posted in NASA Space Programs | Tagged | Leave a comment

More on The Three Pole Trick

3-Pole-trick-article-2A

If you have read the previous post on The Three Pole Trick, you will know what I’m about to say. If you haven’t read it, I would suggest you do – to get a better understanding of this article.

In light of our technology here is an easy experiment to demonstrate to others if there is a curve to the earth or not. Go to an area of the country where there is a flat land, such as the beach. Say, you live in Kansas – which is a flat state. Set up three poles of equal height spaced a mile apart along the road. Do this when it’s dark or nearly so. Stand with a laser pointing across the tops of the poles. Have another person standing a mile or two way – off at right angles to the flags and have binoculars or a small power telescope to look at the light. If everything is lined up, you’ll see the line of the laser straight as an arrow across the poles. No pole will be higher than the other. As we know a laser beam is straight, and it’s something you can see at night. Get a photograph of this and write down the details.

If the earth is a globe, there would be the laser light 8 inches higher than pole B and 32 inches (2 feet 8 inches) higher than pole C.

While you are at it, if you start the experiment during the day, you can take a picture through the telescope at pole B and C, and you’ll see right to the very ground. This would be impossible on a globe, as at 2 miles you would not be able to see 2 feet inches of the bottom of the pole.

Another simple thing to do is, look at the laser light along the two miles and see if it’s parallel to the ground. Of course, you will just have to eye it, but you should be able to notice a difference of over two feet. If you can get to a site that covers a wider area and if you have a powerful enough laser, you can make the test over a longer area. In other words, IF the earth is a globe, the laser light will be at a higher elevation on the far end.

Posted in Flat Earth Experiments | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Three Poles Trick: A Canal Experiment

Published in The Earth

Vol. III Nos. 33 & 34 April and May

3-poles-2

Note: This is from a booklet that was written around the turn of the 20th Century. The grammar, spelling and style is kept the same. To a few readers out there: if you think a word doesn’t exist, look it up in an old dictionary.

Trickery has long been involved in covering up the flat earth – it didn’t start with modern space agencies like NASA, it’s that they have just refined how to fool the people.

The Three Poles Trick: A Canal Experiment

As the very foundation of modern astronomy rests on the assumption that we are living on a whirling globe, all sorts of devices are resorted to to support the idea of the earth’s sphericity.

After having demolished some of the best “proofs” it is surely not necessary to examine and review every statement offered in support of this modern and absurd fallacy. But we will briefly refer to one or two others before going on to examine the question of the Earth’s supposed motions.

We are informed that the Earth’s curvature could be “proved” by three poles placed in a straight line; and such an experiment was tried in a noted instance upon the Bedford Canal, Cambridgeshire. Our examination of this “proof” may thrown some light upon the “trick” which was then supposed to win a wager.

We shall, however, quote again from Mr. Gregory’s book, published in 1892, p. 110.

If three poles of exactly the same height be placed in a line the middle one always appears higher than the other two outer ones. Let three poles be fixed in line with their tops cut off at exactly the same height above some level surface (level mind you!), such as the surface of a canal, then, if a telescope is sighted along the first to the third pole the top of the middle pole will appear above the line joining the tops of the two outer ones. The cause of this is the curvature of the earth’s surface, and if the experiment can be repeated (why cannot it?) in various parts of the Earth, and (“if”) it was found that the curvature was everywhere the same, this would prove that the Earth’s form is globular, and an approximate determination of its size could be obtained. It is found that the middle pole rises 8 inches above the line joining the two out when the distance between each pole is a mile.”

This is a very specious paragraph. It reads well, and an unsuspecting reader might easily be misled by it. But let us examine it a little, and it will be “found to be wholly hypothetical.”

The writer of the paragraph quoted does not say that such an experiment had been tried and that the result was found to be what he said it “would” be if so tried. But in the style of most modern astronomers he jumps from the subjunctive, or hypothetical, mood to the positive, or indicative mood, and says; “If” three equal poles “be placed in a line,” meaning I suppose in a straight line, “the middle one always appears higher than the other two outer ones.” Of course, “if the middle pole is higher, and if it be left in its position, it “always” will appear so; but this is not what Mr. G. meant to say. We may guess his meaning though his words do not express it. But were he to condescend to give particulars as to time and place others might try the same experiment, and the trick might be found out. But we think we can expose it as it is.

Three poles have to be “fixed in line with their tops cut off at exactly the same height above some level surface.” Now, mind their tops must be “cut off.” Good! It is, therefore, self-evident that if the equal poles are fixed on a “level surface” at “exactly the same height,” one pole cannot be higher than another; not even 8 inches. If they appear otherwise the poles could not have been fixed at “exactly the same height”! Yet the writer says: “If a telescope is sighted along the first to the third,” the middle pole “will” appear higher. The language is vague. The question is, does it appear higher, or does it no? Out scientist says it “will.” Well, we shall see soon whether it “will” or no; though 8 inches in a mile cannot appear much.

In the meantime we ask, what does he mean by placing the telescope “along the first” pole? This pole like the others, is upright and perpedicular to the horizon; how then can the telescope be sighted “along” the top of it? This is where the trick comes in! If you remove the first pole and put the tlescope in its place, so as to “sight” only the other two, or if you rest the telescope on the top of the first pole, the middle one may appear higher than the third; because the third being further away, looks perspectively less than the middle one which is a mile nearer. Without asking how there can be a middle pole of two, if you remove the telescope some distance away from the fist pole, and look over or along the tops of all the three poles then they will be “found” to be in the same straight line. And if the telescope be properly adjusted so as to prevent the “error of collimation” the middle pole will not be found 8 inches higher than the other two. This can be tested by experiment; but we shall proceed to prove it by the following diagram.

3-Pole-trick-5A

Let A, B, C, represent three equal poles placed at any convenient and equal distances apart, in a direct line upon the Earth’s supposed curved surface – A D. Then, according to the theory of our astronomical friend the top of the middle pole (B) will be “found” to be higher than either of the poles at A and C, as in the diagram.

Let us suppose for argument’s sake that the pole B has been “found” to be higher than the pole C. Now without removing any of the three poles A,B, C, let us add another pole – D – at exactly the same distance as the others. Ignoring pole A, let the telescope be removed to the pole B, and let it be placed in the same relative position to B as it was to A. Join the tops of B and D to represent their false line of sight. It will now be seen that C is the middle pole of the three, B, C, D; and by the same “line of reasoning” the top of the middle pole – C – will be “found to be higher than either of the poles D and B. but by this “line of reasoning” we have already “proved” that the pole B was higher than pole C, and now we “prove,” in the same way, that pole C is higher than pole B! That is, the pole B – the middle pole experimented upon, at the same time is both higher and lower than the other pole ( C ), which is absurd! Wherefore the pole B is NOT higher than the pole C, but exactly the same height above the same level surface”; and therefore this experiment does not “prove that the Earth’s form is globular.”

1) “The middle pole will (not) appear above the line joining the tops of the two ouoter ones,” if the experiment be properly conducted; and, 2) “the cause of this is (not) the curvature of the Earth’s surface,” for the mere assumption of the Earth’s curvature cannot be the “cause” of anything, that is of anything found in Nature.

But stop! It may be – yes, it is – the “cause” of otherwise intelligent men making mis-statements, false statements, and misrepresentations in support of an absurd theory, which its founder confessed was “feigned” for quite another purpose than for strict truth and integrity; for as we have now abundantly shown, the effort to support this superstitious system causes its advocated to depart alike from both.

3-Pole-trick-7A

This is further illustrated by their diagrams of ships at sea, and the way they make them climb over a supposed hill of water.

The foregoing diagrams are specimens of the false perspective given in astronomical works and school books. They are so flagrant as to need no refutation. The first ship is sledom placed on the “top” of the diagram, but a litle to one side, so that it will appear to rise first before it is made descending at once the awful decline. But then this would be to expose the “trick,” of which no doubt the better class of astronomers are fully aware; yet none of them hitherto have had the courage to denounce the deception practised by their supporters. This is left for others.

That it may be seen we are not alone in speaking thus plainly, we will quote, from Things to Come, part of an address by Mr. Thomas A. Edison, originally printed in Suggestive Therapeutics, he says:

Thomas Edison 1

There are more frauds in modern science than anywhere else…Take a whole pile of them that I could name, and you will find uncertainty, if not imposition, in half of what they state as scientific truth. They have time and again set down experiments as done by them, curious out of the way experiments that they never did, and upon which they have founded so-called scientific truths. I have been thrown off my track often by them, and for months at a time. Try the experiment yourself and you will find the result altogether different.”

Such is the testimony of a practical scientist and experimenter, and we know his testimony is true as regards theoretical astronomy. We could quote other testimonies, but as we have already given proof that such “frauds” are practised, we think it unnecessary to do so here.

ZETETES.

Posted in Flat Earth Experiments | Tagged | Leave a comment

Globe Earth Math

Here is a handy chart to print out and take on experiments or show others. This tells you various distances an object would be below the horizon. IF YOU STILL SEE some object at this distance then “We have a problem Huston.!” By the way, the mathematicians gave us this figure based on the earth being 25,000 miles in circumference, using spherical trigonometry.

Print this out and take it with you when you talk about the flat earth.

Curvature chart

Posted in Flat Earth Experiments | Tagged , | 2 Comments

The Heavens Above Stretched Out

The Earth and Ocean not a Globe

THE EARTH IS NOT A GLOBE REVIEW

1894

antarctic-mountains-2

Note: The date is not on this issue that I have but I believe it’s one of the first issues, the date should be about 1894. They spelling, word usage is kept the same as in the original.

The Earth and Ocean not a Globe; but a circular-plane, according to the two great books of God, Revelation and Nature.

According to the book of Revelation, the word “world” is used more than 260 times in the Bible, and the word “earth” 350 times. The words, “round” or “globe” or “sphere” are never one applied to it. Not a single expression is used from the beginning of the inspired book to the end, suggestive of the idea that the earth is a planet, or, suggesting that the earth is anything else than a stationary plane.

1 Passages speaking of the heavens above as “stretched out,” and the earth spread forth and stretched out upon the waters, so that the line of the heavens is parallel with that of the earth. – Isaiah 42:5; Psalm 136:6. “To Him that stretched out the earth above the waters.” – Psalm 24:2. “He hath founded the earth upon the seas and established it upon the floods.” Genesis 1:10, informs us that the waters were gathered together unto one place, and called the seas, and upon those seas the earth was founded, consequently the waters are beneath and around the earth. The waters sustain the earth, sustain the earth as a whole. – 2nd Peter 3:5. “For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing or consisting out of the water and in the water.” R.V. Reads: “For this they wilfully forget, that there were heavens from of old, and an earth compacted out of water and amidst (or through) water, by the word of God.” Compacted – held together – leagued with – united. Now look! The earth is one – the continents appear to us who are on the surface as being a great distance apart, yet these continents are joined together; they are connected in the water and together they constituted one earth. These connections deep down in the water of continent with continent, are themselves sustained by the waters underneath. “The waters under the earth.” Those water under the earth, sustain the earth as a whole; sustain the earth in its entirely. “The earth compacted out of water and amidst water by the word of God.” The dry land above, or out of the water compacted, united with, the earth in the water and that again compacted, united with, the other continents, amidst or though water.

The continent of America is compacted, united with the continents of Europe and Asia, amidst or through the water of the Atlantic. The continent of Africa, though connected with Asia by the Isthmus of Suez, yet is compacted, united with Asia and Europe amidst or through the water of the Mediterranean Sea, Red Sea, and probably Arabian Sea. Australia compacted, united with Asia amidst or through the water of the Indian Ocean.

God said, let the dry land appear, the dry land did appear. Let the waters be gathered together unto one place, and the waters flowed into the place appointed for them, beneath and around the earth. Here we are on this earth – living, moving, working, trading, buying and selling. This earth is a real earth, it is inhabited as God meant it to be, and some of our fellow beings go down to the sea in ships and see the wonders of God on the great waters. This earth is a real, material earth, and this material earth, really, unmistakably and without doubt, is compacted out of the water and amidst the water. But the planet earth of Copernicus and Sir Isaac Newton is not real – it has no material existence, it is fictitious and visionary.

2 There are also passages showing that the waters surround the earth have their bounds on the great southern circumference. Job 26:10, “He hath compassed the waters with bounds, until the day and night come to an end.” In Margin, “until the end of light with darkness.” In the R.V. Is is “He hath described a boundary on the face of the waters, unto the confines of light and darkness.” Job 38:8, 9, 10, “Who shut up the sea with doors when it brake forth.” 9 – “When I made the cloud, the garment thereof and thick darkness a swaddling band for it.” 10th and 11th, “And prescribed for it my decree (or boundary) and set bars and doors, Good Hope are the ends. The great God sitteth over the circle of the earth – over the north centre and seeth to the ends of the earth. Isa. 45:22. “Look unto me and by ye saved all the ends of the earth: for I am God, and there is none else.”

Job 38:11 “And said, Hitherto shalt thou come, but no further: and here shall they proud waves be stayed?” And far out there on the southern circumference, are solid and impassable ramparts of ice, barriers – cliffs of ice – forbidding and further progress of daring navigators. It was so with Capitan Wilks and Jas. C. Ross. Well, you ask: Do the Scriptures mention these solid walls and barriers of ice out there on the southern circumference? Yes, they do. Job 80:30; “The face of the deep is frozen.” The daring navigators on the southern seas, who have told us on the solid walls of ice – the barriers and cliffs of ice – disclose to use the meaning, the sublime meaning of such passages as Job 38:30; Ps. 33:7.

The earth and ocean together constitute an immense circular plane, according to the other book of God, Nature. There are phenomenal proofs that the earth is not a globe, with north and south pole, but that the earth is a plane, having central region for its north, and, the southern circumference for its south.

3 Long periods of light and darkness, regularly alternating is a phenomenal peculiarity of the north, but not of the south, and proves that the north is the central region, and the south is the circumference.

During the summer solstice, the northern or central region of the earth is illuminated for several months together, during those moths it is a long day without a night. This is a phenomenal characteristic of the north. This being the central region, the diameter of the sun’s orbit in June is much smaller than that of its December or winter solstice, its speed is not so great or rapid as it is in December when on its outer path, or orbit on the Tropic of Capricorn, consequently its rays continue over the northern centre for several months. But in the south this is no the case, though it would be if the earth were a planet. In the south, on the contrary, the day closes abruptly in summer, they have little or no twilight. In the south seas beyond the 50th parallel, the sun will be shining brightly, and, in a very short time, the sailor who happens to be aloft, will be in pitch darkness. The sun seems to drop below the sea. At Auckland, New Zealand, there is little or no twilight. At Nelson, it is light till about 8 o’clock, then in a few minutes it becomes too dark to see anything, and the change comes over in almost no time. Twilight lasts but a short time in so low a latitude as 28 degrees south, according to Captain Basil Hall, so that from 28 degrees south, to beyond 50 degrees south, there is little or n twilight. But, in the corresponding latitudes north, the twilight continues for hours after visible sunset. In the north at midsummer, for many nights in succession, the sky is scarcely darkened.

4 The difference between north and south with regard to organic life, vegetables and animal, show that the earth and ocean is a circular-plane. The long periods of sunlight in the north, develop with great rapidity numerous forms of vegetable life, and furnish subsistence for multitudes of living creatures. But in the south, where the regions is circumferential (not central as in the north, the sunlight cannot linger, but sweeps quickly over the greater southern circle, completing it in the same time as the shorter circle of the north, viz., 24 hours, and so has not time to excite the surface, has not time to aid and stimulate animal and vegetable life to the same extent as in the north, consequently in comparatively low southern latitudes, everything wears an aspect of desolation.

The South Georgia’s latitude 54 and 55 degrees in the very height of summer, is covered deeply with frozen snow; but in the farthest north, nature is adorned with summer beauty; flowers and grasses bloom during a brief and rapid summer. Keruelan, 49 degrees south, boasts 18 species of plants, only one being useful in cases of scurvy, it is a peculiar kind of cabbage; but Iceland, 65 degrees north, 15 degrees nearer the pole in the north, boasts 870 species of plants. Kerguelan’s land, or, Desolation island, was discovered in 1772 by M. de Kerguelan, a French Navigator. Here December corresponds to our June. According to Captain Morrell Keruelan is situated in latitude 48 degrees, 40” south, longitude 69 degrees 6” east. Many of the hills on this island, though of moderate height, were covered with snow, notwithstanding that the season was midsummer. January corresponding to our July. There is not the appearance of a tree or shrub on the whole island. Captain Morrell, 1822 to 1831, in latitude 62 degrees 27” south, longitude 94 degrees 11” east, met with extensive fields of ice, one of which would have measured 150 miles, east and west.

The bones of musk oxen, killed by Esquimaux, were found on the 79th parallel north, while in the south, man is not found above the 56th parallel of latitude.

These differences between north and south could not exist, if the earth were a globe, turning upon axis and moving in an orbit round the sun. the latitudes corresponding north and south, would have the same degree of light and heat and the same general phenomena. The distance round a globe would be the same at 50 degrees south as at 50 degrees north, and the surface at the two places would pass under the sun with the same velocity, and the light would approach in the morning and recede in the evening in exactly the same manner. There would be a sameness of phenomena north and south, if the earth were a globe; but the differences are in harmony with the doctrine of the circular-plane of the earth and ocean.

5 The meridian lines diverge southwards, and the degrees of longitude increase accordingly; but if the earth were a globe, the degrees of longitude northward or southward from the equator would diminish.

From the known distance between two places in the south on or abut the same latitude, and the difference of solar time (or difference in longitude) we can calculate the length of a degree at that latitude.

JOHN T. LAWSON,

Kearney,

Parry Sound District

Ontario

Posted in Old flat earth news | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Forbidden Archaeology Lies

Forbidden-Archaelogy

Doing my research on an old book that supports a flat earth, I came across a video of forbidden archaeology. I had watched a few minutes of a guy talking before a MUFON, LA group and it’s as bad as watching someone talking on Darwin and evolution! MUFON is a national group that does research into UFO and Alien sightings. Now, at one time I believed in this, UNTIL I learned about the flat earth. Anyhow, this guy talked about the extreme antiquity of humans beings on the earth (4 billion years) and that our start came from some Alien intervention. (By the way, I never believed in the billions of years of life, but just in UFOs and Aliens.)

Of course, you see right away that it gets people away from Yahweh, God, our Creator, and the Bible. Creationists believe that Adam, the first man, was created about 4,000 years B.C. This is determined by the age of each Prophet (in the same geological line) in the Bible.

I see that one day soon the government will come out and support the UFO group, as they see that evolution, through gradual genetic change, is bankrupt. So, what will be mainstream will be “we were created by advanced Aliens of some distant planet.”

Now, with the word “forbidden” used, it attracts a lot of people, as people who believe in UFO and Alien visitation, also believe in conspiracies, and the the government lies. Naturally, they gravitated towards something that looks like is opposed to the Establishment. They learned that the mainstream archaeologists don’t believe in UFOs, so the opposite must be true. No, this is nothing but leading those who are searching for the truth down a wrong road – both of which leads to a denial of God’s Word!

Don’t think that those who believe in this “forbidden archaeology” are a few disgruntled people – they are not. Looking at videos on YouTube the stats show high numbers. You can see this by looking at the thumbnails of these videos. The numbers are in the hundreds of thousands each!

If you haven’t seen any of these forbidden archaeology videos, watch one or two of them and notice all the things that are said that is contrary to Scripture. Then, you’ll see how dangerous this teaching is. Here is one here (about this guy that I listen to for a few minutes) Click Here.

It is these people, the people who go to UFO conventions, that have to be reached with the flat earth truth – followed by Bible truth. Once they see the logic, they will have no choice but to discard the science fiction belief of ancient antiquity of the human race, people from other planets, and that we were genetically manipulated to be what we are today.

Posted in flat earth discussion | Tagged | Leave a comment