The Importance of Perspective In Understanding the Flat Earth Model, part 14

The Importance of Perspective In Understanding the Flat Earth Model, part 14

From the booklet: The Sea-Earth Globe and its Monstrous Hypothetical Motions: or Modern Theoretical Astronomy

1918

Note: Punctuation and grammar is as in the original.

Fig. 24

The above diagram is a copy of one by a fellow-worker in the cause of truth, who is no “at the front” in his capacity of electrical engineer. He says: –

“ According to the globular theory, a lunar eclipse occurs when the sun, earth, and moon are in a direct line ; but it is on record that since about the fifteenth century over fifty eclipses have occurred while both sun and moon have been visible above the horizon. The accompanying illustration shews how utterly impossible it is to harmonise this fact with the globularist theory. ” — The Terrestrial Plane , by F. H. Cook, E.E.

“ A remarkable instance of this kind was observed at Paris on the 19th July, 1750, when the moon appeared visibly eclipsed while the sun was distinctly to be seen above

the horizon.”— Astronomy, p. 105, by Prof. G. G. Carey.

Two other instances are given in McCulloch’s Geography, dates September 20th, 1717 and April 20th, 1837. And the London Almanac for 1864 gives four other dates. Sometimes an ill-informed globite denies the possibility of such eclipses, thus tacitly acknowledging that they are inconsistent with the globular theory ; then when he is convicted by accredited astronomical testimony he suddenly turns round and as ignorantly shouts “ Refraction !”

Let any intelligent astronomer attempt to shew HOW refraction can reflect upwards ” two great lights ” with full clear discs, when according to his theory the centres of both lights should be 90° below the horizon, to say nothing of their lower limbs. Yet here we have the two orbs occasionally coming and smiling down upon us for our folly ! I believe that all lunar eclipses, occurring about sunset, would be seen to be “ horizontal eclipses ” by observers, if they were only in suitable positions.

Others object that “ the earth’s shadow on the moon is always round ” ! We need not pursue the enemy down to every dirty shell-hole into which he rushes for cover; suffice to note that here are three more assumptions— (i) the earth’s shadow, which we have fully exploded ; (2) that it is always “ round and (3) that only a globe can give a curved shadow on a sphere ! Go by night into a room with only one light, and take a flat ruler and an orange or a larger ball, and you will find that a fiat piece of wood can cast a curved shadow on the ball.

Astronomers confess that there are many dark bodies in the heavens, some of which could doubtless cause an eclipse ; though we do not here assert that they do. Read Jude 13.

As there is a focus of light, so there is a definite focal point of darkness opposite ; and when the moon, which has a “ lesser light ” of her own, gets inside this dark focus, her rays, and her influence, is seriously interfered with— a fact well known to astrologers. Her light is not entirely cut off, as we have seen the whole of the moon’s face a dark copper colour, at the moment of the totality of the eclipse, the moon having a peculiar light of her own, very different from the sun-light.

(Deut. xxxiii. 14, and I. Cor. xv. 41).

Eclipses were predicted hundreds of years before the Copernican theory was invented, to say nothing of the later “ New Astronomy.” Thales, about 600 years before Christ ; and the great astrologer Ptolemy predicted eclipses hundreds of years in advance ; and zetetics, who possess past tables of eclipses, can predict others, for they occur in cycles, or periods, of 18 y l o j d, and have nothing to do with the globular theory. In fact they could not be calculated on the latest globite speculations, as the following illustration will shew those who are willing to see.

Let a taxi drive round a large square ; as it spins along,let a horseman ride his Pegasus round and round the taxi ; and suppose a swallow squealing and circling round the Pegasus ; when and where would these three bodies, representing sun, earth, and moon, fall into one with the principal avenue of the square ? Who would calculate “ this problem” ; especially if they did not know either the size of the square or the velocities of the moving bodies ? No eclipse could last out half its present duration. Yet eclipses, with their magnitudes and durations, are still calmly tabulated ; and

ill-informed globites imagine that this is “ another proof ” of the truth of modern astronomical theories!

Posted in Flat earth and science, Flat Earth Experiments, Old flat earth news, Sun Moon Stars | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Importance of Perspective In Understanding the Flat Earth Model, part 13

The Importance of Perspective In Understanding the Flat Earth Model, part 13

From the booklet: The Sea-Earth Globe and its Monstrous Hypothetical Motions: or Modern Theoretical Astronomy

1918

Note: Punctuation and grammar is as in the original.

As the previous chapter was longer, my limits require this to be shorter; so I must put the maximum of meaning in the minimum of words.

In the previous chapter, it was shewn how, by perspective alone, the sun appears to descend almost to the horizon, although remaining that day at its average altitude of between two and three thousands miles. In diagram 22 we made no allowance for refraction, which would have still further reduced each of the angles, and especially the lower ones. Diagram 23 supplies the omission, and illustrates how the sun descends to and disappears on the distance horizon.

Light is a very subtle force, and one of the most easily refracted from the rectilinear; but like all other forces, it takes the line of least resistance, whether in a curve or in a line practically straight.

Its undulations falling from above on the atmosphere are refracted, or reflected, more and more according to the angle at which they strike, and the density of the media through which they pass. We need not here enter into the unsettled question of the density of the luminiferous ether, especially as optical density is not always the same as physical density.

Hence those rays of the sun which strike the atmosphere very obliquely, as from F to g, instead of proceeding in a straight line to the earth’s surface below h, take the line of least resistance and proceed towards the spectator at A. now an observer always sees an object in the direction of the rays entering the eye; therefore the observer at A will see the sun’s image in the direction of the line A h f, setting on the distance horizon!

The sun is never seen below the horizon, but at the vernal equinox at 6 p.m. If the earth was a globe the centre of the sun would be 90° below the horizon; while its upper and lower limbs would stretch above and below thousands of miles if the sun were the size the astronomers assert!

The sun’s rays can be entirely cut off from a spectator at the sea-level, as at A, while its reflected light can still be seen by observers in higher altitudes, from a high balloon or from the top of a mountain. There is an angle of total reflection where the light, being reflected upwards off the denser atmosphere, does not penetrate to the surface of the earth, as along the lines F k n. A flat stone thrown obliquely on to the smooth surface of a lake, may strike the water unseen by a fish far below, and leap upwards again and again before sinking by its own weight. And the sun’s lower limb is the first to arrive at the angle of total reflection it is naturally first cut off.

The apostle Paul tells us “the wisdom of the world is foolishness with God”; and it will appear foolish to us if we are enlightened by the wisdom which comes down from above. “If any man lack wisdom” on Creation or other Truth, let him not be too prooud to ask the Creator for it, as this writer has done, and he will find the fulfilment of the promise given in James 1. 5.

Posted in Flat earth and science, Old flat earth news, Sun Moon Stars | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

What Handwriting Analysis Reveals About Donald Trump

What Handwriting Analysis Reveals About Donald Trump

So, how do you learn more about Donald Trump than what he would tell you and what the media will tell you? You can find out more by the knowledge of certain sciences. The first one we’ll start off with is handwriting analysis. What many people don’t know is that handwriting analysis is a science, unlike tarot cards which is ‘the devil’s work.’ Handwriting analysis is used by courts of law in America; it is used by large corporations in France when hiring people. What handwriting analysis does, in part, reveals the character of the person. Before you judge, check out this video. Especially listen to the last minute and a half and keep in mind that this was made before Trump was elected President.

Trump’s Mineral Deficiencies as Revealed by Facial Analysis

By looking at the person you can tell if what minerals they are deficient in, as the video below shows.

Donald Trump and Body Language

 

Donald Trump power of persuasion, mental tricks he uses.

.

After viewing the above videos, we have a much better idea of the state of mind and health of Donald Trump.

I hope you enjoy this post.

Posted in Important News | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Importance of Perspective In Understanding the Flat Earth Model, part 12

The Importance of Perspective In Understanding the Flat Earth Model, part 12

From the booklet: The Sea-Earth Globe and its Monstrous Hypothetical Motions: or Modern Theoretical Astronomy

1918

Note: Punctuation and grammar is as in the original.

GENERAL LAWS OF CELESTIAL MOTION

  1. There seems to be two great Etherial Currents eternally revolving round their respective centres, one north and the other south; like two immense cog-wheels revolving harmoniously in the opposite directions. The etherial currents doubtless supplied the primun mobile of the ancients. These currents move most rapidly above and around the equatorial belts (like the water in the middle of a stream), becoming slower towards the “poles” or centres of the wheels.

  2. The planets, sun, moon, and stars, being comparatively small and light bodies, are carried daily round the world by these all-powerful currents at different altitudes, according to their various densities, the higher currents moving them more rapidly than those lower, or nearer the surface of the earth.

  3. The more rapidly a planet revolves daily round the earth and the higher its altitude, the nearer it is to the “fixed stars,” which are the highest of all; the fact is illustrated by Neptune and Uranus, which keep a long time in the same zodiacal “signs.”

  4. The nearer a planet is to the earth and the more slowly it revolves, like Venus and Mercury, thus more repaidly getting left behind by the higher planets and constellations, and so passing thourhg the signs more quickly, or strictly the signs leaving the planet more quickly.

  5. The moon, which is the lowest of the heavenly bodies, the one nearest to the earht, gets left behind by the “fixed stars” as much as 12° to 14° daily, thus passing through all the twelve signs of the zodiac in a lunar month. This makes the globularist image that the moon has what they call a “proper motion” in a direction contrary to that of her “apparent” daily motion. And if a planet keeps in conjunction with a fixed star for a few days they call it “stationary”; if it loses a little on a star it is said to be “direct”; and if it should gain a little on a star they actually call it “retrograde” to suit their theories!

Thus the motions of the celestial bodies are governed by the etherial currents, according to their heights and declinations; their actual speed being quicker the nearer the are to the great equatorial belts, and their circles or spirals becoming smaller, and speeds slower, as they approach nearer the north or south centres. This causes their daily revolutions to consist of a series of very fine spirals, as they vary their declinations, the north and south centres being the earthly focal points of the two great vortices, or etherial whirlpools, which carry with them the planets, the sun and the moon, and sometimes make them pass over from one great whirlpool to another. This causes the seasons and some lunar changes, with the various planetary periods or cycles of time. These, with the eclipse cycles, are of great utility in celestial chronology; and, for those with sufficient understanding t compute them backwards, they prove that it is not quite 6,000 years since the Adamic creation of the world.

Posted in Flat earth and science, Flat Earth Experiments, Old flat earth news | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

How Reality Is Manufactured

How Reality Is Manufactured

Considering how the flat earth is part of the manufactured reality, this video is appropriate. A good video can be made or an article written of everything the Establishment does to manufacture a heliocentric false reality.


.

Posted in media lies, mind control | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Importance of Perspective In Understanding the Flat Earth Model, part 11

The Importance of Perspective In Understanding the Flat Earth Model, part 11

From the booklet: The Sea-Earth Globe and its Monstrous Hypothetical Motions: or Modern Theoretical Astronomy

1918

Note: Punctuation and grammar is as in the original.

THE SUN’S PERSPECTIVE DESCENT

The various branches of Truth are connected, so that if we find one important branch we can be led on to another; and similarly if we break off one branch we injure all. Compare Rom. Ii 20 and James ii. 10.

The question now arises, If the sun keeps at the same general height in its journey over the plane earth, why does it appear to go down and set? The student should again read the article on “Perspective, true and false,” and note especially rule 5 there given. A balloon sailing away high above an observer appears to descend as it recedes, although retaining the same altitude.

Referring to the above Fig. 22, an observer sitting inside a greenhouse, or conservatory, with a curved glass window, will see phenomena something like what is there depicted.

A represents the position of the observer, C the sun’s position at XII, noon, and the line C F the “elevation” of about one-fourth of its daily path. At 1-30 p.m. the sun arrives at D, making the angle d A B an angle of about 58° with the base line, already proved to be level.

At III. p.m. The sun arrives at E, making the angle 2 A B of 38°, or a descent from C of about 52°. at VI. p.m. The sun arrives at F, a distance from C of nearly three times its height, and the angle of its rays drops to about 22°, and sometimes to only 18°.

Thus the fact is made clear, that even by perspective alone the sun seems to drop almost to the horizon, while remaining at the same height. If the sun were a non-luminous body it would disappear sooner, as a balloon disappears. There are details which we cannot here stop to consider, such as variations in the time of sunset caused by alterations in its declination. The speed of the sun itself varies, hence we find a good clock sometimes aid to be “fast” and sometimes “slow,” according to the time of the year and the size of the sun’s circle over the earth. These are points which can be studied with the aid of a good astronomical almanac or ephemeris. But I may briefly intimate the general Law of Motion for celestial bodies.

As far back as the year 100 I published these Laws of Motion, which are much simpler than those of Kepler, which later astronomers have spoiled, as shewn in a previous article, and which we have altogether exploded.

Posted in Flat earth and science, Old flat earth news, Sun Moon Stars | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Importance of Perspective In Understanding the Flat Earth Model, part 10

The Importance of Perspective In Understanding the Flat Earth Model, part 10

From the booklet: The Sea-Earth Globe and its Monstrous Hypothetical Motions: or Modern Theoretical Astronomy

1918

Note: Punctuation and grammar is as in the original.

THE SUN’S DISTANCE AND FOCUSSED IMAGE

In studying this part of the subject, we must distinguish between the focused Image of the sun, as sometimes seen refracted through the clouds, and that orb’s position as seen at non in a clear sky when there can be but little refraction Fig. 21 is a copy of a drawing I took years ago in Lat. 52 ° 38′ N. and Long. 1° 9′ W., when the sun’s rays were divided at an angle of about 90° . on one side they fell on a church, and on the other on a tree four miles away from the church.

The focussed Image, therefore, would be only about two miles high, a distane equal to C B, the base of a right-angled triangle.

Had anyone ascended in a balloon, the focus of the light would have receded upwards, as a rainbow recedes when an observer tried to approach it, the height of the bow depending upon the observer’s position and that of the sun. in judging the sun’s true distance we need a clear sky when the sun is on the meridian at noon.

Taking official figures, we find the latitude of the French Bordeaux (edge of the water) given as 45° N.; that is 2,700 miles north of the equator at a point in the same longitude, reckoning 60 miles to one degree. Now let us refer to the left half of Fig. 21.

At the time of the equinoxes, March 21 and September 24, the sun is directly over the equator in the longitude of Bordeaux at noon ©. thus we then obtain the right-angled triangle B C S, the sun’s vertical rays falling upon the point C, and making with the line CB (already proved to be level) the right-angle B C S.

Looking from Brodeaux towards the sun at mid-day we look along the line B S, making an angle of 45° with the base B C. now in every triangle the three angles are together equal to two right angles; hence the remaining angle B S C contains 45° , and is equal to the angle at B.

But as Euclid proves, when two angles of a triangle are equal, the sides subtending, or opposite them, are also equal; hence the base B C is equal to the perpendicular C S. In other words, the height of the sun above the flat earth is equal to the distance of Bordeaux from the equator in Africa, probably less, but certainly not more than, about 2,700 miles! Q.E.D.

Posted in Old flat earth news, science and flat earth, Sun Moon Stars | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

The Importance of Perspective In Understanding the Flat Earth Model, part 9

The Importance of Perspective In Understanding the Flat Earth Model, part 9

From the booklet: The Sea-Earth Globe and its Monstrous Hypothetical Motions: or Modern Theoretical Astronomy

1918

Note: Punctuation and grammar is as in the original.

The motion of the planets, as described in this series of article from an old flat earth booklet, how the moon, for example, would have to behave IF it was traveling round the earth WHILE the earth itself is travelling round the sun. This is accompanied by illustrations demonstrating the impossibility of such motions.

SUN’S SIZE

In books on astronomy we are gravely told that the sun is more than a million times larger than the sear-earth globe. The writers who make these extravagant assertions do not condescend to give us any good practical evidence in proof thereof. There authoritative assertions are supposed to be sufficient, in spite of good authorities against them, and the oppositions of “science” against “science.”

This was complained of long ago by intelligent men like John Wesley, who in his Journal expressed his disbelief in the theory of Copernicus and Newton. He wrote: –

The more I consider them the more I doubt of all systems of astronomy. I doubt whether we can with certainty know either the distance or the magnitude of any star in the firmament. Else why do astronomers so immensely differ with regard to the distance of the sun from the earth, some affirming it to be only three and others ninety millions of miles.” – Journal, vol. IX., p. 392.

When doctors disagree, who shall decide? Our God-given senses, and a few practical observations. We have shewn that the moon is a faithful witness in the heavens, and we may find the sun’s testimony the same – two good witnesses when critically examined, both testifying against the extravagances of modern theories. Now look at Fig. 20.

Let an observer stand by night directly under a lamp-post; the light above him will cast no side shadow. If he moves northwards his shadow will fall towards the north; and if he goes south his shadow will fall southwards. If the light were extended by a number of gas jets above his head, say for ten feet, then on the observer moving that distance underneath he would still see no shadow. That is, the vertical rays of the light would cast no shadow for a distance equal to its own extent. Now apply this reasoning to the shadows of vertical objects cast by the sun’s rays.

In northern latitudes the shadows fall towards the north; and in souther towards the south. The declination of the sun varies from the tropic of Cancer, 23 ½ degrees N., to an equal declination south of the equator, the tropic of Capricorn. Between these extremes the sun is always, at noon, directly overhead in places with latitudes equal to his declinations, the variation in which is the cause of the varying seasons. In these places on land, or at sea, the sun casts no side shadow at non; and it has been found that this phenomenon extends for 32 miles. So that the column of the sun’s vertical rays is 32 miles across in every direction – a distance equal to the length of the solar diameter! And whether we take the surface of the sea as curved or horizontal, there would make little difference to the diameter, as many be seen on referring to Fig. 20.

During the Boer War Dr. Robertson, a medical gentleman, sailed with our troops from England to South Africa, and in 14 degrees N. latitude the vessel at noon came under the vertical rays of the sun. he discovered the fact above mentioned, and published it in a book he wrote. He was a globularist at the time; but as I lost touch with him soon after reading his book, I cannot say how his discovery affected his subsequent belief. It ought to have brought him into the ranks of planists (flat earthers, ed.); and I posed him some of our literature.

His book entitled The Mutual Relations of the Sun and the Earth. I do not now posses a copy, so I cannot quote directly from it, ad or space is very limited; but Dr. R., by diagrams and arguments, demonstrated that the diameter of the sun is only 32 miles across. Thus the sun is a small body as compared with the size of the earth; yet as compared with the planets it is a giant, and, as the Psalmist says, “a giant rejoicing to run his race!” (Psa. xix. 5).

The Nautical Almanac bears out the truth of the sun’s comparatively small size: it gives the sun’s semi-diameter as 16′ minutes of a degree. One degree of latitude is equal to 60 miless; and as there are 60 “minutes” to a degree, twice 16 minutes must be equal to 32 miles, the sun’s diameter by no less an authority than that of the navigator’s chief almanac!

We are aware of the usual astronomical quibble to get over this difficulty, another assumption, the sun’s immense distance; but whatever the distance may be the sun’s rays traverse it, and the column of vertical rays is only 32 miles across. The sun therefore witness to the truth of the Nautical Almanac – another “faithful witness to the heavens!” But luminous bodies often appear larger than they really are, as is sometimes illustrated by the old moon being “in the arms of the new.”

Posted in Flat earth and science, Sun Moon Stars | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Who is changing the beliefs and morals of Patriots today?

Who is changing the beliefs and morals of Patriots today?


How the beliefs of Patriots today is different from those of years ago.

If you have been in the Christian/Patriots movement for many years, you’ll know that there is a change in the beliefs and morals of people who say they are fighting for freedom. And this should not be IF we are standing for the truth. After all, truth never changes but lies do.

Old time Patriots were not afraid to say they were Christian but now you’d think this would be a taboo word. You hear the big name Patriots of today say, in one video, that they are Christians. They make this brief comment, then talk on other subjects and NOT bring up the word Christian, Christ or the Bible for many broadcasts. Why is it? Are they afraid that they might offend some agnostic person that’s a supporter? Or are they afraid to offend someone of another religion, such as the Jews? This was not say many years ago. Right-wing leaders of years ago would often call on the name of Christ several times in each talk but you don’t hear that today. So, how Christian are they?

There is some variation, of course, but basically, CP of years ago believed in:

  • the races are not all equal (except under the law)
  • the sodomy was evil
  • that Fascism and Communism were diametrically opposite
  • that they were against the Jews
  • that the holocaust never happened (in the context in which it is used today)
  • that non-white races and those of a different religion than Christianity should not be allowed in
  • that WWI and WWII was started by the Allies

There are more topics but this is enough for now.

The Christian/Patriots of today believe (with exceptions of course):

  • all races are equal
  • homosexuality is OK
  • Fascism and Communist are basically one and the same
  • that we should not be anti-Jewish
  • the holocaust happened and 6 million died
  • all races and religions should be allowed in
  • basically believe in the Allies’ history of WW II

Now, these are major changes in the way that Christian/Patriots believe, or what Patriots believe that are not Christian.

If you don’t know what CP believed in, then get your hands on old literature – if you can – of those who were in the freedom movement of, say, 50 years ago and find out more.

Yes, I know there are variations of the above beliefs but what I listed above do represent many people who call themselves Patriots. The thing I want to bring to your attention is that changes have been made in beliefs and this is not a good thing. After all, aren’t we all fighting for the truth? And, do you agree, that truth never changes? We agree that lies change but we are fighting against lies. So, how and when did this change come about? It did not come about from old CP as they would have told them why they believe in what they do. Therefore, the enemies of Christ had to have slipped in to make the changes.

  How can changes be made in the basic beliefs of CPs? My thoughts are this, now, I might be wrong but it makes sense. You promote some people who look and talk against the System and do have some good articles and videos. Then you promote them, give them the money they need so they become the “leader” and “spokesperson” of the political right.

“Repeat, rinse and wash” with another person who books himself as a Patriot. Make their name big, make a great website for them, have great internet marketing and before you know it – everyone is saying they are the leaders. Then, with the leaders established and expressing the morals that the enemies of Christ want them to express, others will more likely take the cue and repeat the same thing. For those that don’t, the “leaders” will tell you they are not Patriots but are fakes or just another extreme faction of the right-wing.

With the internet it’s much easier to spread false information around and it costs less, too. But I assure you that the morals that is expressed by the “big-wigs” in the political right are NOT what was expressed years ago.

The Communist murdered, Vladimir Lenin, said (paraphrasing), “If you want to control the opposition, you become the opposition.” Of course, you are really not acting against your own interest but just misguiding those who are, so your enemies will not be successful.

I can write more on this but it will have to be for another time. I just wanted to get his off to you now. And what prompted me doing this is, that just the other day Alex Jones was in the UK Daily Mail online version, saying, “that Alex Jones is a character actor” – this, according to the lawyer for Jones’ ex-wife. And, his ex-wife said that “Alex Jones is unstable.” Interesting!

Posted in False Preachers, mind control | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Is the Mexican-American Wall For Another Purpose?

Is the Mexican-American Wall For Another Purpose?


The real purpose of the Mexican-American Wall

We all heard about the wall Donald Trump wants to build and many people supported Trump for this idea. But, could the Mexican-American wall have another purpose – a sinister purpose? I got this thought after reading what policemen are doing in America – and it was frightening. Click Here for the article.

If you don’t have time to read the article, it’s about how policemen and custom agents are doing strip searchers and looking in your body cavities – all the suspicion of you carrying drugs. They are even doing this is in public when they stop you along the road side!

Now, we have all seen videos of police brutality when stopping people – some of the videos are from the police cars themselves. So, this is the next step – strip-down body searches along the road.

Trump supporters are now waking up that they have been conned from other things that he said during his campaign and what he is doing now. So could this be another con?

You can look at a wall from the perspective of:

Keep undesirables out

Keeping good people in

We have all took the Mexican-American Wall to keep the illegal/undesirables out. But what IF the real purpose is to keep people in? America can become so bad that even the illegal immigrants would want to get out!

Patriots know that America is a police state; and, like the Berlin Wall of Germany, it was used to keep people in. East Germany was a Communist police state, as you all know. So, the fact that you are living in a police state, wouldn’t you want it open ground to make your escape easier? Of course you would.

Say the situation gets worse in America and some of your options – such as boarding a plane as a means of leaving. Wouldn’t you want to have another avenue of escape? Wouldn’t you want to be able to cross the boarder on foot if need be? This is what thousands of Germans did before the Berlin Wall went up. Now, picture yourself trying to cross the Arizona desert when there is a 20 foot wall that is guarded; it would be very difficult if not impossible.

Literally, several million American had seen “the writing on the wall” years ago and are now living in another country where they have more freedom. But as more and more people wake up, the majority will try to leave when it’s too late, as there will be a huge wall in front of them.

For those who say, “How do you keep the illegals out then?” I say it’s very easy but no one wants to talk about it because it’s not “politically correct” and that is – don’t offer any benefits to them, period! And, have requirements for residency that you have to have enough money to live there. That is why we have people flooding our boarders – because we are giving them welfare money, free health care, schooling and housing. Cut that off, and you will not have the people coming over. You will also have open land that is not marred by a big ugly wall. Many years ago, America did not have an illegal immigration problem (very little, if you want to pick on the details). And we did this without a wall. So, we can do the same thing today.

In the meantime, have your bags packed, make a plan and be ready to run! And I’ll meet you on the other side – of the boarder that is 🙂

Posted in Important News | Tagged , | Leave a comment