Musings 11 April, 2017
Find out the real reason why people get sick eating wheat. The cause is from Roundup spraying which causes gastrointestinal disorder and you’ll be more prone to environmental toxins.
Dr Blaylock talks about what chemtrails do to your mind. Blaylock is one of America’s leading brain surgeons. Watch your outdoor activites on days that they spray as well as 2 days afterwards as it takes time for all the chemicals to drop.
.
The preacher in this video, John Weaver, talked a bit about ‘Culture Marxism.’ Here is the list below. When you read it think of what is going on today. You can say that the Marxist (antichrist Communists) completed their agenda. Also, think about certain people in the Patriot movement who also push some of the points of the Culture Marxist. Maybe they don’t want to lose some of their members and have scummed to political correctness.
****
Anti-white racial hatred
Degenerate art and degenerate music
Feminism — The attack on fathers and the encouraging the breakdown of the family.[4]
Huge demographic genocide of white countries to destroy identity and create tension.[4]
Miscegenation (race-mixing)
Orwellian hate speech laws for criticizing non-whites and religions other than Christianity while at the same time spewing endless hate speech toward whites and Christianity.[4]
Political correctness (it is based on Orwellian Marxism after all)[4]
Continual change in society to create confusion.[4]
The teaching of different sexuality to children. First it’s homosexuality then transexuality then when people accept that, push extreme pruditry of Islam.[4] One of the founders of Cultural Marxism, Georg Lukacs, who as Deputy Commissar for Culture in the short-lived Bolshevik Bela Kun government in Hungary, had his first act to introduce sex education into Hungary’s public schools.
He knew that if he could destroy the West’s traditional sexual morals, he would have taken a giant step toward destroying Western culture itself.[5]
The undermining of schools and teachers’ authority.[4]
The promotion of excessive drinking. The Bible allowed drinking but not drunkeness.[4]
Emptying the churches.[4]
An unreliable legal system with bias against the victims of crime.[4]
Dependency on state or state benefits.[4]
Control and dumbing down of media and TV.[4]
Multiculturalism.[4]
The creation of trauma through injustice.[4]
Destruction of the economy through banking, mass immigration and globalism.[4]
.
The sky is solid and can be rolled up:
And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. (Gen 1:6)
And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. (Gen 1:7)
And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day. (Gen 1:8)
There are doors and windows in the sky
In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened. (Gen 7:11)
The fountains also of the deep and the windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was restrained; (Gen 8:2)
Though he had commanded the clouds from above, and opened the doors of heaven, (Psa 78:23)
There is a large body of water above the solid sky
And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. (Gen 1:6)
And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. (Gen 1:7)
Who layeth the beams of his chambers in the waters: who maketh the clouds his chariot: who walketh upon the wings of the wind: (Psa 104:3)
He watereth the hills from his chambers: the earth is satisfied with the fruit of thy works. (Psa 104:13)
Praise him, ye heavens of heavens, and ye waters that be above the heavens. (Psa 148:4)
When he uttereth his voice, there is a multitude of waters in the heavens, and he causeth the vapours to ascend from the ends of the earth; he maketh lightnings with rain, and bringeth forth the wind out of his treasures. (Jer 10:13)
The sky can be bent, torn or spread out
Bow thy heavens, O LORD, and come down: touch the mountains, and they shall smoke. (Psa 144:5)
He bowed the heavens also, and came down; and darkness was under his feet. (2Sa 22:10)
Oh that thou wouldest rend the heavens, that thou wouldest come down, that the mountains might flow down at thy presence, (Isa 64:1)
It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in: (Isa 40:22)
There are pillars holding up the sky
The pillars of heaven tremble and are astonished at his reproof. (Job 26:11)
Then the earth shook and trembled; the foundations of heaven moved and shook, because he was wroth. (2Sa 22:8)
The sky is solid
And all the host of heaven shall be dissolved, and the heavens shall be rolled together as a scroll: and all their host shall fall down, as the leaf falleth off from the vine, and as a falling fig from the fig tree. (Isa 34:4)
It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in: (Isa 40:22)
The sky is compared to the fabric of a tent that is stretched out over the ground. The sky can also be rolled up – this implies a solid sky.
The water is divided
And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. (Gen 1:6)
And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. (Gen 1:7)
And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day. (Gen 1:8)
“We are more gullible and superstitious today than we were in the Middle Ages, and an example of modern credulity is the widespread belief that the Earth is round. The average man can advance not a single reason for thinking that the Earth is round. He merely swallows this theory because there is something about it that appeals to the twentieth century mentality.”—-George Bernard Shaw
“If the earth be the globe of popular belief, the same amount of heat and cold, summer and winter, should be experienced at the same latitudes North and South of the Equator. The same number of plants and animals would be found, and the same general conditions exist. That the very OPPOSITE is the case, disproves the globular assumption. The great contrasts between places at the same latitudes North and South of the Equator, is a strong argument against the received doctrine of the rotundity of the earth.” ~Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny”
“This uniformity of temperature partly accounts for the great accumulation of ice which is formed not on account of the great severity of the winter, but because there is practically no summer to melt it. In the Antarctic there is eternal winter and snow never melts. As far north as a man has travelled he has found reindeer and hare basking in the sun, and country brilliant with rich flora; within the Antarctic circle no plant is to be found.” ~Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny”
“While the premise makes sense – that the earth’s eastward spin would cause the water in a toilet bowl to spin as well – in reality, the force and speed at which the water enters and leaves the receptacle is much too great to be influenced by something as miniscule as a single, 360-degree turn over the span of a day. When all is said and done, the Coriolis effect plays no larger role in toilet flushes than it does in the revolution of CDs in your stereo. The things that really determine the direction in which water leaves your toilet or sink are the shape of the bowl and the angle at which the liquid initially enters that bowl.” -Jennifer Horton, “Does the Rotation of the Earth Affect Toilets and Baseball Games?” Science.HowStuffWorks.com
“Circular sailing no more proves the world to be a globe than an equilateral triangle. The sailing round the world would, of course, take very much longer, but, in principle, it is exactly the same as that of the yachtsman circumnavigating the Isle of Wight. Let me give a simple illustration. A boy wants to sail his iron toy boat by a magnet, so he gets a basin, in the middle of which he places a soap-dish, or anything else which he may think suitable to represent the Earth, and then fills the basin with water to display the sea. He puts in his boat and draws it by the magnet round his little world. But the boat never passes over the rim to sail under the basin, as if that were globular, instead of being simply circular. So is it in this world of ours; from the extreme South we can sail from East to West or from West to East around it, but we cannot sail from North to South or from South to North, for we cannot break through intervening lands, nor pass the impenetrable ramparts of ice and rocks which enclose the great Southern Circumy
“A very good illustration of the circum-navigation of a plane will be seen by taking a round table, and fixing a pin in the centre to represent the magnetic pole. To this central pin attach a string drawn out to any distance towards the edge of the table. This string may represent the meridian of Greenwich, extending due north and south. If now a pencil or other object is placed across, or at right angles to the string, at any distance between the centre and the circumference of the table, it will represent a vessel standing due east and west. Now move the pencil and the string together in either direction, and it will be seen that by keeping the vessel (or pencil), square to the string it must of necessity describe a circle round the magnetic centre and return to the starting point in the opposite direction to that in which it first sailed.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!”
“On a globe of 25,000 statute miles equatorial circumference one has to be 24 feet above sea level to get a horizon of six miles, the ‘curvature’ being 8 inches to the mile and varying inversely with the square of the distance. We are thus taught to believe that what appears at all times of the day to be half a circle, or about 180 degrees, is in reality only a few miles, as the earth rotates against the sun and thus deceives us. But the phenomenon of a lunar eclipse requires, according to astronomical doctrine, that the earth shall be exactly midway between sun and moon, to shut off the light of the sun and thus to darken the moon. Those two ‘bodies’ being then according to the astronomer, opposite each other and the earth between, must each be 90 degrees, or a quarter of a circle distant from an observer on the earth’s surface – that is, half a circle from one to the other. So that what astronomy, on the one hand, teaches is only a few miles distant, the horizon, is thus seen to be, according to its own showing, half a circle for the sun is at one side of one quadrant, and the moon at the other side of another. If, therefore, the observer be on the equator when the phenomenon occurs, he can see, according to astronomical measurement, over 6,000 miles on either side of him, east and west. If in north or south latitude, he would see correspondingly less, but thousands of miles in every case. But, on the other hand, according to the popular theory, he would have to be hoisted 4,000 miles away in space for such a thing to be possible. The fact of lunar eclipses having been observed when sun and moon were both above the horizon at the time of the eclipse, and thus that the observer pierced, with the unaided eye, a distance of thousands of miles on either side of him – about half a circle – proves that the earth does not rotate, and that it is not the globe of popular belief.” -Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny”
“No one ever yet felt or saw the earth careering through space at the terrific rates it is credited with, but everyone who is not blind can see the sun move. But the matter can be tested. It may be known for certain whether the sun moves or not. Take a school globe and place a stile on the semicircle that holds it in position. Cause the globe to rotate against a lamp on a table, and you will find that the shadow left on the globe is always parallel to the equator, at whatever angle you may incline the globe. Further, let the stile be of sufficient length to allow the shadow to fall on to a flat surface, moving the globe towards the lamp, and the shadow will be a straight line. If, therefore, the shadow left on the earth by the sun be a straight line, then undoubtedly the sun is stationary. Drive a stake into the ground in such a position as to expose it to the sun for the greater part of a day – the whole day if possible. Mark the end of the shadow every quarter of an hour, and you will find that the marks form part of an elongated curve, clearly proving that the sun moves over a stationary earth.” -Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny”
You have mercury in your teeth; you’ve been injected dozens of times with mercury, aluminum and multiple other excitotoxins and neurotoxins, you’re breathing nanoparticle aluminum, barium salts and lithium; your food has been poisoned with heavy metals, Aspartame, monosodium glutamate and dozens of other neurotoxins; your municpa; water is poisoned with brain destroying hydrofluorosilicic acid (otherwise known as fluoride used in rat poison), lead, aluminum, chlorine and other neurotoxins; you’ve been indoctrinated in globalist public schools, mesmerized and mind controlled by globalist-controlled news and entertainment media and “your” government continually lies to you, threatens you with violence and scares you into submission with false-flag attacks.
So, no, I’m neither surprised nor upset when you pose stupid arguments and call me a “conspiracy theorist”. I understand and I forgive you.
.
With so much information to cover I think that it’s better to put various topics into one Post. I hope you like this rather than getting it in ‘dribs and drabs.’ Of course, depending on what I’m doing on any given day I might come across only one good thing that is worthy of your time. But, let the other day, I came across several good topics that I thought it would be good to make one Post on it.
I’m sure that some of this you might already know about, while others is something that you had read years ago, while still other topics are new. Keep in mind there are many people on this website that are on various paths of the road, so to speak.
The first topic is about Fukushima. This was the nuclear reactor that was hit with a title wave back in March, 2011. from certain websites we still hear about the big scare that radiation will kill half the world. Here is one link that has links to many different articles that give the other side of the story. We heard one side of the Fukushima disaster, now listen to the other side and see what makes sense. Click Here for a list of articles.
“The Shack” is a title of book that has sold about 20 million copies. It is suppose to be a book about hope. And there are many Patriots who speak highly of it – unfortunately they don’t know Scripture. You might have already bought “The Shack” fine, but listen to what these two people said about it.
Kent Hovind in Support of The Shack
Here is a video of Kent Hovind in support of The Shack. He answers critics who told him that this is not a good book. In about 7:00 in, he talks about someone who wrote to him saying (the person who wrote the letter) “you should see this video (and he gives the link), talks on why this book is Scripturally wrong.” Do you know what Hovind said? Paraphrasing, “I do not have the time to see it and probably won’t in the future!!!
Hovind said nothing in regards to comparing The Shack with the Bible – he avoided the issue all together. Yet, the whole video is about people that have written to him telling him the book is wrong but Hovind hasn’t bothered to address the issue. Amazing! This means he can’t defend his position
Now, this is an indication that Hovind does not intent to learn WHY others disagree with him and disagree with the book. Anyhow, who makes a video and thinks that the book The Shack is great, but doesn’t want to learn why others disagrees shows that he is not looking for the truth. It’s like a judge saying, “I don’t want to hear what the defendant says now and I won’t have time in the future, but he is guilty anyway.” This, in essence is what Hovind had said.
Comments on the above on Kent Hovind’s support of The Shack
We have all heard that the world is over crowded and that we must reduce the population. Of course, the only way for the world leaders to do that is to kill us off. Of course, they don’t call it that. Bill Gates calls for vaccinating the people to keep them from getting sick. This is a lie. Anyhow, at Over Population is a Myth.com tells another story and it’s presented in short, easy to understand videos. Check it out at: www.overpopulationisamyth.com
This long article along with videos explains everything. Donald Trump wants the return of coal to provide energy but there is a better alternative. The suppression of alternative forms of energy is all about control and make trillions of dollars from the current way we generate electricity.
This article along with the videos will tell you everything you need to know about alternative forms of energy.
From the booklet: The Sea-Earth Globe and its Monstrous Hypothetical Motions: or Modern Theoretical Astronomy
1918
Note: Punctuation and grammar is as in the original.
If you have not got an ordinary sundial, fix in your garden an upright pole or rod with a ball on the top of it ; say in England, or in any country with good north latitude, and at the time of the vernal equinox. Then from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. peg out the positions of the shadows of that ball every quarter of an hour, and draw a line along the pegs ; you will find it makes a great curve, about half of an ellipse with the longer diameter, as in the inset north. If your rod was at the north pole, the shadow would make a semicircle.
At sunrise the light circling round casts the shadow of the pole at 0 towards r ; and as the sun works round to the south of your dial the shadow of the pole will go northwards towards t. Similarly when the sun works round to the west, the shadow gradually curves round to n in the east. When living in London many years ago, I frequently tried this experiment in my back garden, as also a similar one on the flat housetop with a shorter rod or stylus.
Now if the moving daylight has been caused by the rotation of the earth, the shadows of that ball in the garden, or of the knob of the shorter upright stick on the housetop, would have fallen in a straight line. Test the truth of this b y an experiment with an orange, or a larger ball, in a dark room illuminated by one lamp. Place an upright stylus near the centre of a flat and stationary table, and carefully carry the light half-way round. You will get the sundial curve. Then fix a match in the orange, and place the light in the centre of the stationary table, and squarely rotate the orange. If you do so honestly and properly, you will get a short straight line, according to the proportions of your experiment.
Thus the sun-dial, the shadows of our lamp-posts in the city squares, and the shadows of our tall trees in the city parks, all testify, often daily, to the great fact that we are living on a plane and stable earth, with the hight of heaven daily revolving around. Truly “ the heavens declare the glory of God ; and the firmament sheweth his handiwork : day unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth knowledge.” (Psa. xix. 1, 2).
Yet, as it was of old, the wise men, the magicians, and the star-gazers, cannot read the writing on the wall! It was left for an humble captive of the King to come forth and give them the true explanation. Therefore to “ the only wise God,” the God of Daniel, and the Father of our Lord Jesus the Anointed be all the praise and glory. Amen.
Necessarily imperfect, but shewing the relative positions of its three great divisions ; “Heaven above, earth (land) beneath, and water under the earth.”— Second Commandment, Ex. xx. 4).
fig 26
UPHOLDING ALL THINGS BY THE WORD OF HIS POWER. (Heb. i. 3.)
A— the first heaven, where God’s throne is, with waters above the firmament. B— the Firmament, or second heaven, a strong structure supporting the waters above it. (Job xxxvii. 18). C— the roof of the Unseen (Hades) or Under-World, forming the third heaven, where Paradise is at present concealed awaiting our Lord’s return. (Compare Luke xxiii. 42, 43. with Matt. xii. 40). Tehom, the abyss. (Isa. Ixi. I ; I. Pet. iii. 19 ; Jude vi. ; and Rev. ix. 11 and xx. 1-3)
Here is a video by a man who claims that broad ban signals are bounced off the Firmament for communication. Did you even think how could satellite dishes be fixed and stationary IF there were satellites moving around? What would make them stationary? Anyhow, listen to see if this makes sense.
.
From the booklet: The Sea-Earth Globe and its Monstrous Hypothetical Motions: or Modern Theoretical Astronomy
1918
Note: Punctuation and grammar is as in the original.
F ig . 25
Zetetics own much to a London medical gentleman, who list century, under the nom de plume of “Parallax,” revived the zetetic cause by his able writings and powerful lectures. But it is seldom given to pioneers to dig out all the truths they unearth. Hence, early zetetics only acknowledged one pole, no evidence of a south pole having then been actually discovered by Antarctic explorers. It was left for “ Zetetes ” principally to carry on the war, and to be the first zetetic to acknowledge the proved existence of two so-called “ poles.” This he did many years ago in various articles published in a book entitled Zetetic Astronomy, now sold out of stock ; and also in lectures in different parts of the country, and in public debates. He was the first editor of The Earth— not a— Globe Review.
At the same time it was shewn that these so-called “ poles ” are not the two termini of the earth’s imaginary axis ; but rather the north and south centres of solar and stellar celestial motion. Stars with north declination revolve daily around a central star in the north called “ Polaris,” and stars with south declination around a southern centre near Sigma Oct antis.
An objector in N.Z. sent the writer some photographs he had taken, shewing what he called “ Star Trails ” around a southern centre, and which he wanted me to believe were globe trails, or trails caused by the rotation of the earth !
I accepted the photos as honest and genuine proofs of southern star motion ; but I insisted on the title the photographer himself had given them : they were “ star trails ” and nothing more. In fact the rotation of the globe would have produced different lines, especially of those stars passing directly over the latitude of the photographer. So that when properly understood, they were against the globular theory, and not a proof of it.
The fixed stars are so called, because, except for very long periods, they do not appreciably alter their relative positions ; and they are mere points of light, so small that the most powerful telescopes cannot magnify them into discs. Yet they are supposed to be suns of immense size, removed by the astronomers to immeasurable distances away from us, for the credit and convenience of their theories— yet not so far but that they profess to be able to find a parallax for many of them. The star Alpha Centauri is said to be one of the nearest to us, and it has been given a parallax of o” 75.
But if it were a sun of such a size, even though it were many times farther off than it is said to be, it would shew in the Lick telescope a distinct disc of at least half a second ; so that the contention of Sir A. R. Wallace is here justified “ The fact that there are no stars with visible discs proves that there are no suns of the required size.”— Fortnightly Review.
But the sun, moon, and planets have discs or faces of various sizes, some very small ; and they wander from the north circuit to the south, and vice versa, according to their seasons and times. Thus the sun daily revolves around the north centre for six months, then it crosses into the south circuit for six months. Thus its height, as the Psalmist long since told us, reaches from one end of heaven to the other. (Psa. Xix. 6).
The question has been asked, If the sun crosses from the northern circuit to the southern, how is it so little difference is observable in its positions ? The above diagram (Fig. 25) will help the student to understand this more intricate part of the subject ; but we must remember that there is a great difference between the motions of the solar orb, and the motions of light which proceed in every direction away from it. The motions of the celestial bodies we have already explained in connection with Fig. 22 ; and we have also shewn that the equator is a broad belt of vertical rays, and not a mere “ imaginary line.”
We will refer to Fig. 25. At the vernal equinox the sun is at E in the morning at 6 a.m. Its light travelling round with the etherial currents, is seen at the same moment by an observer at A. Now an observer always sees an object in the direction of the rays entering the eye ; and the curve of about 6,000 miles from E to A is so great, that for the last few miles the rays seem to come to A in a straight line in the direction from H. Hence he sees the sun’s image rise “ due east,” not north-east, proving that light travels in great curves.
In the same way observers at a, and at M, see their different sun images at I and at T ; but it is self-evident that the orb of the sun itself cannot be in these various positions at one and the same time. Six hours later the sun itself arrives from E to A, and it may happen that then its swirl outwards from N drives it into the southern current, and it goes round with that current in the direction of the arrow until it arrives at p, when its light, preceding it in a great curve, the sun’s image is again seen at H from A.
It then goes round with the southern currents, daily, contracting its circle in a fine spiral until it arrives at 231 S. when, having lost its further southern tendency or swirl, electrical and magnetic forces, doubtless under intelligent supervision, drive it again northwards. Similar explanations apply to the moon, and to the planets, but with different periods, owing to their different altitudes, as already explained in a former article.
.
Christian Flat Earth Ministry 