Science’s Quarrel with the Bible

Science’s Quarrel with the Bible

Extracts from Lectures by Walter Rowton, Esq.

Without, so far as I can see, a single fact in support, it has been assumed that man’s earliest ideas of a God, of his own origin, of the earth’s age and form, of the sun, moon, and stars, originated with himself; that the cosmogony by Moses, if he wrote Genesis, was a mere jotting down of ignorant doctrines in themselves— the residuum of speculative traditional ideas which had been afloat in the world for ages ; ages whose backward reach did not terminate at Adam, but whose years in the aggregate, with their lost records o f pre-Adamic man, most probably amounted to millions.

But, on the other hand, there is a Book, believed to be the oldest in existence, which distinctly ascribes a ll man’s knowledge of God, himself, and the universe to the Divine Being ; not as it would seem superstitiously, but because such was the matter-of-fact experience of the then good men, and among them of those whose histories in part this record gives. Because the Book of Job happens to be one of the books of the Bible, is it, as evidence worthless! Please to remember that in Job’s day there was no Bible. You must consider therefore the history given as it originally stood, by itself; having none of our theories to advocate, and none to oppose; knowing, in short, nothing whatever about them.

Job’s one discreet friend, Elihu, said, “ The Spirit of “hath made me, and the breath of the Almighty hath given me life.” {Job xxxiii. 4.)

How did he know that; not a line o f the Bible being then in existence ? Was it borrowed from the heathen I We have no right to assume that so far there had been any heathen worship, excepting of the sun and moon.

Was the notion human? From its sublimity it would seem not.

The highest capability of notions, purely human, has not at any time shown itself equal to higher conceptions than the invention of atomism, culminating in Darwinism. Whenever men have left these conceits in search of higher, their exploration result less, they have had to return to them again. And the latest return was but yesterday.

Was Elihu’s notion a tradition ? Perhaps ; but its source seems more probably God Himself than man : for the latter, cultivated as he may be, whenever he gets away from the gross worship of idols, never witnesses for anything more definite than an “ unknown God ; ”a supposed, not a perceived or realised Being. Again : this, if tradition is traceable to God rather than man ; because the world’s tendency has ever been to prefer a god or god’s of its own invention; it has always objected to a revealed God. And again : this, if tradition, is traceable to God rather than man, because of its many subsequent reiterations, to all appearance officially, naming Him as the Authority.

Was it to Elihu an unauthenticated tradition ? There are good reasons for thinking it was not. Remembering that the inhabited earth according to the usual computation, was in existence for some 2,300 years before Moses wrote in God’s name to His chosen people— were these all that while left to their own notions ? Were they without communication of any kind from the could they are stated to have first known in Eden, and to !have thenceforward acknowledged ? The evidence of the book of Job is, that the relations of God with good men were as realisable then as at any subsequent time o f which we have particulars. So on the face of it we might infer ; otherwise it seems impossible to account for their religion having remained wholly uncorrupted for 2 for years; Job’s religion and that connected with the garden of Eden being as much one as though no interval had occurred.

Before the Christian era, the most difficult thing men ever tried was the remaining true to the unseen God. Left for awhile to themselves, the bulk of them invariably forsook Him for the worship of idols, and preferably idols of their own making. Moses but forty days absent, and down went the Israelites before a golden calf ! Repeatedly convinced that God was, directly He intermittent confirming His existence by signs and wonders, that instant men began to doubt His being and withdraw from His worship. Again and again shown that Dagon fallen upon his face, his head and hands cut off, and only the stump of Dagon left to him, ( i Sam. v. 3, 4), was nothing in the world but a sorry cheat, yet they set Dagon in his place again and bowed to him as usual. Yes ; even the children of Israel, who in this respect actually did worse than the heathen “ whom the Lord had destroyed before them ” (2 Chron. xxxiii. 9) ! These seem to be the common instincts o f men— and especially of those whose melancholy falling away from Aaron to Zedekiah are so minutely recorded in the Bible— I say that the unswerving loyalty o f the unseen God’s worshippers for 2,000 years, from Adam to Moses, is quite inexplicable unless the record be true; unless God, before a line was written in His name, really had the constant communications He is stated to have had with the elect families who professed His service. How was it that Job, towards the end of those 2,500 years, although tried to the utmost of human endurance, never once thought of denying God.

How was it there was not a single unbeliever in God amongst those “ miserable comforters ” who did their best to alleviate by aggravating his calamities ? It is impossible to account for it, except upon the hypothesis that the Being of God was, in those days, so indisputably confirmed to His worshippers by the habitual intercourse he is represented to have had with them, that denial of His being was simply out of the question. Had Job’s religion been merely the in organised superstition it is the fashion to consider it, severely tested as it was, and with nothing tangible to hold it together, surely, so empty, so powerless, so comfort-less a sham would not have retained his allegiance for an hour.

How is it that those we esteem our greatest philosophers seem quite unable to talk science without venting second-hand sarcasms at the expense of men’s religious delusions! I say “ second-hand sarcasm,” for whence gained they their superlative contempt? Every jot of it from the Bible ! Who has denounced the imbecilities of superstitious worship with such witheringly scorn as the Bible’s God ? He not a whit more real than the Baal he proves a myth ! So indeed they tell us ; but from such sticklers for least we expect conclusions according to evidence, not contrary. Whether they accept the Bible as from heaven or of men, this much is proved : its writers were as free from superstition, and as much alive to the follies of visionary and spurious religions, as the most enlightened free-thinker who ever lived.

Agreeably, then, with the marvellously concurrent testimony of the Book of Job and the Book of Human Nature, it appears that Eiihu knew God had made and given him life ; not of his own knowledge, but by reason of that information having been God’s revelation ; first, perhaps to his ancestors, and confirmed from their day to his own.

I f this be true, there should, one would think, be contemporaneous statements and evidences establishing that God gave it, and how it was given. Well, there are such statements and evidences.

Note: gods Of The New Age

There is a new video posted at this link on our website. It’s about occult infiltration in society. Click Here.

Also, a new post in the News section of this website, under 20th June.

 

Posted in Flat earth and science, Flat earth science | Tagged | Leave a comment

Seeing With The Eyes and a Telescope

Seeing With The Eyes and a Telescope

By WILLIAM THOMAS WISEMAN, F.R.G.S., etc.

  The surface of all water, when not agitated by natural causes, such as winds, tides, earthquakes, etc., is perfectly level. The sense of sight proves this to every unprejudiced and reasonable mind. Can any so-called scientist, who teaches that the Earth is a whirling globe, take a heap of liquid water, whirl it round, and so make rotundity ? He cannot. Therefore it is utterly impossible to prove that an Ocean is a whirling rotund section of a globular earth, rushing through “ space” at the lying-given-rate of false philosophers.

When a youth, I stood upon the Dover shore of the English Channel, and was told to watch a departing ship. “ See! There she goes; down, down, down! The hull has disappeared! She is out of sight! Now, my boy, you have had an ocular demonstration that the world is round (meaning globular in shape) AND SEEING IS BELIEVING.” I walked up to an “ old salt” who had a telescope, and said: “ Can you see that big ship through your glass that’s gone down the Channel, and is now out’ of sight?” “ Yes, my son, look!” The big ship immediately came into view again, as I peered through the old sailor’s glass! “ Why my —– told me the Earth was round, because that ship I can now see had turned down over the horizon!’ Aha! Aha!”

“Sonny, I know they all says it ! Now, I have been all over the world, but I never believed it. But, then, I have no learning, only my senses to rely upon, and I says SEEING IS BELIEVING.”

I now, after many years, endorse the old sailor’s experience, that the world is not a globe, and I have never found the man who could prove by any practical demonstration that he, or I, are living on a whirling ball of Earth and water! How is it that the atmosphere goes round with it? By what law does the dense Earth and the rare air rush around together? Declare, ye scientists, IF YOU KNOW! The Scriptures of God’s inspired Prophets contradicts the unreasonable, illogical, unscientific delusion, and false philosophy, that the fixed Earth is a hollow fireball with several motions !

There is an old adage, by which you can fix them,
There is not one lie true, no, not if you pick them.

.

 

Posted in Old flat earth news | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Puzzled Cleric

The Puzzled Cleric

From the Earth Review, July 1895

By “ ICONOCLAST”

The PUZZLED CLERIC depicted in our illustration shows the quandary thousands of his calling, as well as many other sincere people unexpectedly find themselves in after expending their time in schools and colleges poring over mind staggering- literature to imbibe the numerous ASSUMPTIONS which originate in and ramify from MODERN THEORETICAL SCIENCE (so-called).

We advise all who are in this unenviable position to courageously climb back to the MOUNTAINS of COMMON-SENSE and resolutely keep to the track which leads away to the right towards TRUTH, where they will discover the solidly constructed BRIDGE of ZETETICISM, by which the ABYSS of DOUBT and INFIDELITY can be easily overcome without fear or perplexity.

Many superficial thinkers may be inclined to doubt the position of the Puzzled Cleric, but those who have passed through the general course of education, especially that of the Higher Grade, will admit that it cannot be successfully carried out without a large amount of THE MODERN THEORETICAL SCIENCE being imbibed, and in such an insidious manner that it is almost impossible for anyone destined to become an expounder of REVELATION to be otherwise than biased by his THEORETICAL SCIENCE training; but putting aside for the moment this particular phase of the subject and viewing it from a purely secular point, we have good authority from one of Modern Theoretical Science’s most admired and be-lauded champions, which is condemnatory of this falsely so-called SCIENCE, we allude to Professor HUXLEY, who has candidly said, “ True science is connected knowledge; connection between its conclusions and their first principles must be capable o f demonstration, that it (True Science) differs in nothing from common knowledge, save its accuracy and constant testing and verification, that it sees FA C T S as they are, or at any rate without the distortion of prejudice, and reasons from them (the FACTS) in accordance with the dictates of sound judgment. TRUE SCIENCE IS SIMPLY COMMON SENSE AT IT’S BEST, that is, rigidly accurate in observation, and merciless to fallacy in logic.” To condense the above, we may say, true SCIENCE is positive in its character. This question therefore remains for all of us, viz. :— Is there any really positive character in MODERN THEORETICAL SCIENCE ? After patiently investigating in every COSMOGRAPHICAL, ASTRONOMICAL and GEOLOGICAL direction, we are compelled to answer in the negative, as we find and PROVE this so-called SCIENCE nothing more than a mass of groundless ASSUMPTION and SUPPOSITION.

We will now take another glance at The Puzzled Cleric, and also think of those in a like position , quibble or sophisticate as he or they may, the bridging of the ABYSS of DOUBT and INFIDELITY, from the MODERN THEORETICAL SCIENTIFIC ground, by any amount of WARPED INTERPRETATIONS or “ HIGHER CRITICISM ” so-called, is as impossible as attempting to bridge the ATLANTIC with a cob-web ; so called Right Reverend Fathers, Doctors of Divinity and Theology, with Professors “ galore,” have (honestly in many cases) attempted times out of number, to accomplish the business, with the results, that many have candidly owned themselves beaten outright, while others have sunk abashed into the Abyss of Doubt and Infidelity ; and yet with all this, to as much as hint dissent from the original and generally accepted THEORETICAL PREMISS (viz. THE GLOBULARITY OF THE WORLD) of Modern Theoretical Science, is sufficient to raise a sneer in some, and make even those who openly call themselves Christians, put their tongues in their cheeks, or at most, secretly pity what they are pleased to call THE IGNORANCE OF THE DISSEN TER S, and then complacently walk off to their various PLACES OF WORSHIP like so many infallible oracles or popes, with their Bibles (which contain THE TRUEST SCIENCE extant, but which they do not virtually believe in) tucked tightly under their arms, and their robes of sanctity and self satisfaction wrapped around them, as much as to say, “ thank God we are not as other men are ! ”

We again analogise to Mr. Foote for the use of his admirable suggestion.— Iconoclast.

 

Posted in Old flat earth news | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Captain Scott and the South Pole Exposition

Captain Scott and the South Pole Exposition

(From an old flat earth magazine called: Monthly Magazine)

Pics: Mt Erebus. Ross island, mt erebus Antarctica

(In the UK Daily Mail there was an interesting article about the South Pole for those interested in a plane and motionless earth. But, unfortunately, it was in 1904.)

The return of the Discovery in search of the “South Pole” was professed to be described in a full narrative by Capt. Scott, R.N., Commander of the Antarctic Exploring Expedition, which sailed from New Zealand in December, 1901.

From the account it appears that the Discovery, and the relief ships – Morning and Terra Nova – arrived at Lyttleton, N.Z., on April 1st, after voyaging 2 ½ years in the Antarctic regions. As the Expedition was assisted out of the National Exchequer, whatever facts may have been elicited ought to be made public.

It may be stated for our readers’ information that it was in January, 1902 (six months after sailing from Cowed) that the discover entered the ice-field; a month later, when 2,000 miles south of New Zealand, she became gripped in the ice. This occurred in a region near the volcano Erebus, an active crater, named after the leading ship of the expedition commanded by Sir James Clarke Ross, about 60 years ago.

In that voyage the evidence pointed to the fact of the earth being a plane, the extremities of which ware bounded by vast regions of ice and water, and irregular massed of land.

I believe when a true plan of the earth is known, it will be found to have four “corners.” Three of them are known, and the fourth exists, possibly under the water. It has not yet been discovered. Mr. E.E. Middleton, I am convinced, is on the right track.

That the sun’s path has been moving southwards in a concentric course may reasonable account for the changes in temperature that must have taken place on portions of the earth’s surface, where remains of verdure that could only have existed in a different climate are found. We may note the discovery that certain specimens of flora found in the North polar regions exist in the southern ice fields. The fossil remains of plants discovered by certain explorers, are thought to point to the fact that, at some period in the past, the now icy south was once warmer. At present, at the point to which the Discovery expedition penetrated, the mean temperature for the year is below zero; they once experience 100 degrees of frost. In such a locality scanty moss, with a few lichens, form the only plant life.

  When the explorers were sleighing through a blizzard, we are told that “if their glovers were not securely fastened on, they would instantly be blown away” (!) This corroborates our personal conclusions, viz. ; that the furthest south being beyond the vision of light and darkness – or day and night – is piercingly cold, and subject to boisterous winds, which seep with intense force across the clashing icebergs.

The narrative given in the above named papers, is, as far as it goes, favourable to the deduction that the earth rests upon and within the waters of the great deep, and that it is a floating island, or serie of islands, buoyed up by the waters, and probably supported by submarine land connected with other land beneath the ice in the extreme south.

Commander Scott, on describing his winter sojourn in the wild Antarctic regions of solitude, was most preserving in his attempt “to look on the frozen page of God, and see what the letters meant.” by his sledge journeys into the interior of the unknown continent, he says, he has succeeded in finding it to be a bleak plateau (elevated plain) rising 9,000 feet above the sea, “and stretching interminable to the south.” This goes far to put the stamp of proof upon what we have expressed as our belief in respect to what exists far south.

Captain Scott, with Mr. Skelton and party, found a new route to the West, and established a depot 2,000 feet up the glacier, 60 miles from the ship. On October 6th, 1903, one section of the explorers started for the strait in lat. 80 S, and they found it contained a large glacier formed from the inland ice ; and they obtained information as to the point of junction between the barrier-ice and the land. A depot, established the previous year, was found to have moved a quarter of a mile to the north. Six of the party reached a point 160 miles S E of the ship, travelling continuously over a level plain. No trace of land, and no obstacles in the ice were encountered, “and evidence was obtained showing this vast plain to be afloat.”

It is something to know that the expedition was within 500 miles of the so-called “South Pole,” and that all this way off the compass was reversed.

During the return journey the Possession Islands were found to be more numerous than shown on the charts ; but Wilke’s Land, Right Gold Knoll, and other lands marked on the chart, were apparently not in existence ; and the Discovery sailed right over the spot where they were supposed to be located.

  When steaming along the great Ice Barrier, discovered by Sir James Clarke Ross in 1842, at the furthest easterly point Captain Scott discovered new land, which His Majesty has been pleased to have called after himself, viz. : “King Edward VII Land.”

We may note that the Discovery, in settling down into winter quarters in February, 1902, was frozen in, “and endured a long dark winter, with a night of 122 days, when the temperature fell to 62° below zero, and it was unsafe to venture from the ship, for even a mile, because of the blinding blizzard that raged almost continuously.” This quotation is an excerpt from the statement of Lieut. Shackleton, of the Discovery. “Does the phrase, ‘a night of 122 days’ mean that the sun was not seen for that long period?” was a question put to me ; and I replied, “Certainly.” And as such is undoubtedly the case, I ask, how would it be possible to experience !a night of 122 days,” if the earth be a globe careering round the sun, as they say it does?

It is with decided satisfaction that I read of a western route having been located, and a depot being established up the glacier, 2,000 feet above sea level ; but it appears to me a little premature for the Royal Society Executive to determine that the form of the presentation to Capt. Scott shall be a silver globe, with the route marked to strengthened the hypothesis that we are living on a globe. If a globe is a suitable present on which to mark the route of the ship, why was the ship, in the first instance, not navigated by the aid of a globular chart? We do not think that the gallant captain would have ventured out to sea with a globular chart ; had he attempted to do so, I feel assured that the voyage would never have been as successful as it has.

I would suggest, therefore, as a more suitable form of present, a large silver block in the form of the great “level plateau,” which he discovered, “stretching interminably to the south.”

Posted in Arctic Antarctic, Old flat earth news | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Flat Earth: Degrees

The Flat Earth: Degrees

  This is a technical talk on the flat earth, specifically about the sun’s orbit, so it might be hard for some people to follow this.

A “degree,” according to the Encyclopedia Britannica, is the 360th part of the circumference of a circle, which part is taken as the principal unit of measure for arcs and angles. The degree (°) is divided into 4 minutes of 60 seconds. Astronomers assume that the earth is a globe, and each 360tyh part of a circle all round it is called a “degree;” it is also assumed that the earth moves, though it is the sun which appears to do so.

The position of the sun in regard to the earth’s surface is changed one degree in four minutes; in other words: 15 degrees per hour, and 180 degrees (or half the circumference of the earth) in 12 hours; hence the hour is on a time-piece is divided into 60 minutes. The sun’s time varies, but clock time does not vary.

In regard,however, to the earth’s surface, we are told that the distance between parallels of latitude in different latitudes is not uniform, the length of the degree being greater at the equator than at the poles.

The length of a degree perpendicular to the meridian has been computer and compared with the length of a meridional degree in the same latitude, giving the proportion of the poles to the equatorial axis. The result differed considerably from the obtained by meridional degrees.

Degrees of longitude radiating from the North have been stated to gradually increase in extent as they approach the equator, beyond which they are again said to converge and gradually diminish in extent towards the south. This is the popularly accepted theory.

The matter might be decided by measuring some distance to the south of the equator at right angles to a given meridian (with non-expanding rods), and between two points where the sun is vertical at an interval of 4 minutes of solar time – i.e., as one degree is a 360th part of the sun’s whole path over the earth so is the period of 4 minutes a 360th part of the whole 24 hours, which the sun requires to complete his course; therefore, whatever space on the earth is contained between any two points (where the sun is on the meridian at 12 o’clock and 4 minutes past 12) will be one degree of longitude. If we know the approximate distance between any two place in the South, on or about the same latitude, we can calculate the length of a degree of longitude.

No shadow of doubt rests in my mind that the degrees South converge the same as they do in the North, so that the length of a degree South grows less as we go further from the equator. “Parallax” taught otherwise. I believe I have seen the quotation from his book, but have not read the work through.

If meridians converge south of the equator (as I believe they do) then a degree would measure less at 30° south than at the equator. But taking the ration of the supposed globe degrees at that distance, both north and south would be about 47 miles long.

I have heard such scientists as decide these things admit that they are far from their measurements of degrees; and I am convinced that no man has yet “perceived the breadth of the earth,” nor measured it practically.

The globular idea must be stamped out from a man’s mind before he can see things from a true position, and think of the sun’s rays, as he proceeds above his pathway in the heavens, falling upon and directly touching the earth’s surface so as to form a circle, and the extreme limits of his rays of light forming a larger circle within a larger circle, where sunlight comes to an end, and beyond the limits of day and night.

Posted in Flat earth science, Sun Moon Stars | Tagged | Leave a comment

A Message of Health to Flat Earthers

A Message of Health to Flat Earthers

I posted a video that I pray you find informative to keep you in health. Check it out under the link at the top of this page, under Bible Study/Health titled: Enzyme Deficiencies Or Click Here.

.

 

Posted in Natural Healing | Tagged | 2 Comments

Hear Stupid Arguments from Kent Hovind on the Flat Earth

Hear Stupid Arguments from Kent Hovind on the Flat Earth Discussion

The Biblical Flat Earth Series: Philip Stallings Vs. Kent Hovind

One stupid argument by Hovind is that a circle has no depth, therefore, when Isaiah speaks of that, it could not mean the earth is a circle. The quick answer to that is, this is a new fangled definition of the word “circle” and this was not how a circle was thought of in the days of Isaiah.

Philip Stallings, the interviewer, is playing the “devil’s activist” when discussing the flat earth.

.

Posted in flat earth discussion | Tagged | Leave a comment

Google and the Flat Earth

Google and the Flat Earth

When searching with Google and using the words ‘flat earth’ (and some other word), it’s important to be as high in the search engine as possible. As you know, people who are looking for flat earth information often find themselves looking at websites that debunk it – even if they are on Page 1 of Google.

Christian Flat Earth Ministry was on Page 1 under certain keyword searches, now it’s on Page 2. I would like it to be on Page 1 again and I’m sure you would, too. I think I know how CFEM got to Page 2.

When Google or any other search engine uses algorithms, they are looking for content that relates to the word(s) that is put in the search box. They also look for frequency. This is only natural if a company wants their search engine to be accurate and relevant. With my posting, as you know, I have articles that are not related to the flat earth. With an accumulation of such articles, the search engine tries to determine how relevant the whole website is to the search words ‘flat earth.’ If a website has only one article on the flat earth and the rest is about how to grow a garden, Google will put that site on page 56,193, for example. In other words, it will be at the bottom. You can be sure that no one will do a search and go through that many pages to find out about your article.

With that in mind, I have to make a change. I know I just wrote an article about putting some other hot topic of news on this site and it has brought more new people to this site, BUT I think I have to keep those articles to a minimum, otherwise we will drop further in the search engine results.

This ranking, as they call it, is really a balancing act: too many non-related articles will get you further down in the searches, while keeping the website static, will not draw the attention of search engines. You see, search engines – whether it be Google, Yahoo or Bing – looks for activity on a website – you do, too. If you have been to a site where nothing has been posted in months, you don’t go back there, do you?

In order to keep us active and in the top search results for certain relative keywords, I would have to:

Keep the non-related flat earth articles to an absolute minimum

Keep posting 3-4 times a week or thereabout

Now, there is just so much you can post on a subject. With CFEM website there are over 650 Posts and many of them are videos that contains a lot of information for one post. So, when just about everything is posted that you can think of, the only thing to do is to post some old articles. I hope you understand this. But this is needed in order to score high in search results.

As you know there are other flat earth sites that look fantastic and the owner has done a great job and put a lot of money into creating flat earth videos – which we all benefit from. But their website has remained static. Thus, they are not high in search results – which is a shame. Anyhow, that is the way it is.

As you know, there are always new people learning about the flat earth for the first time, so these older articles are a benefit to them. Another advantage is, with a ton of information that we read or see in a years time we forget about what we had read a year ago or, at least, forget the details. So, with an old article re-posted, it would be refreshing to read again.

Mixing ‘flat earth’ words in with an article on other topics might be a way when I do post an occasional article.

Learn and Grow

We are all learning and growing and a lot to keep up with. I don’t want to stop at just the flat earth information. After all, when a person learns about the lies that have been told us about our earth, they want to learn about what else we have been lied to. For those who haven’t asked themselves that question, when other conspiracies are presented to them, a light bulb goes off in their head and they want to learn about that, too, (hopefully). In short, I don’t want new readers to go away and think that the rest of the world is fine.

As you know, there are many cover-ups that people should know about and that it is all part of the New World Order that is being force on us. So, how do I present that on a flat earth site? As you know, a whole library of books have already been written on all the evil that is going on in the world. So, I can’t put this all on one website. The only way that I can think of is, to simply provide a link to other people’s website that have covered other topics in detail. That is why I have added a Page titled ‘Links’ to the top of this website months.

So, what do you guys think about all this? I would like to hear from you.

Take care and God bless.

 

Posted in Flat Earth Experiments | Tagged | Leave a comment

Are You a Brainwashed Christian?

Are You a Brainwashed Christian?

 

By Brig. Gen. Jack Mohr

 

Throughout the history of this world, there have been many great discoveries. When Columbus discovered the New World in 1492, it was one of the greatest discoveries of his age. He was not the first white man to set foot on this continent but the word of his discovery got out, it caught on and the greatest migration in the world’s history took place. Over 40 million Caucasians came to America in a hundred year period. (Could this have anything to do with the Biblical prophecy of Jeremiah 3:14-15?)

 

The North American Continent was too big, too obvious and too rich to keep it hidden from the crowded, needy masses of Europe forever.

 

Today, one of the greatest discoveries, if not the greatest of our age is in the process of being revealed. It is a Bible discovery which is too big, too important, too obvious to be kept hidden from confused, White Christian people forever. It has been revealed by great Bible scholars before, men like Alexander Cruden (Cruden’s Concordance). But it never caught on, because most of our churches didn’t want you to know about it. It would have meant revising much of their theology and they couldn’t have that happen. But it is catching on, and soon there will be no stopping it.

 

What is this tremendous discovery, you ask? It is simply that the white Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, Germanic, Scandinavian and kindred people are the Covenant people of the Scriptures (Gen. 17:1-7).

 

You say: “But my pastor has always told me that the Jews were the Chosen People.” Why don’t you study the Bible for yourself and see what it says? See what your Lord Jesus Christ says about it. Never take any preacher at his word, without first checking it out against the Word of God. Today, my Christian friend, this discovery is getting out. It is crossing denominational boundaries. This time there will be no stopping it, no matter what tactics are used. Some of the “brain-washed Christians,” will cry “racism.” But they do not seem to mind when the anti-Christ Jews claim this promise for themselves. Some of the holy, pious will say this message detracts from Jesus Christ. The people we now know as Jews are cunningly and falsely accusing its believers of hatred. Ministers like the electronic evangelists and Bob Jones University are fearfully shouting “cultists” and are frantically trying to refute it by throwing out one or two of their favorite Scriptures. Then there are those who will always resist the truth, who see what is taking place and smugly say: “So what, we’re saved. What difference does it make?”

 

You see, we are somewhat like Columbus’ age. It didn’t matter that his critics said the world was flat, or how loudly they cried about what he had proved, nor the status of education of his critics. The time had come for that great truth to get out and no one could stop it. BUT PRAISE BE TO GOD, IN SPITE OF EVERY TACTIC, THIS TRUTH IS GETTING OUT and thousands upon thousands are seeing for the first time WHO THEY ARE, and what their obligations are before God.

 

But to whet your appetite a bit, let me say a few things about this marvelous discovery. First, it is not new. Our Founding Fathers knew who they were. The Pilgrim Fathers called themselves: “The seed of Abraham, God’s servant, and the children of Jacob, His chosen.” This can be found in their records; these were their words. They used the Old Israelite word “LED”; they were not “DRIVEN.” They believed that God had brought them to America for a special purpose. Their passage to the New World was speeded by the great Israelite texts and they braced themselves for trouble from the unknown, with the great Israelite promises. They kept their colony free from crime and blood, by following the counsel of Moses, the “law giver” of Israel. They allotted their land as Israel had done.

 

The same acts of God which occured when He took Israel out of Egypt, occured in different ways when the American nation was taken out of England.

 

You must remember, that in spite of what all critics say, the “Planting of America,” was a spiritual planting. The hereditary strain which determined our country’s characteristics, was direct from the Law of God as given to Israel.

 

They came to this land with the specific idea of planting a Christian nation. The Charter of each of the thirteen original colonies proves this. There are so many parallels between the history of ancient Israel and the United States, that they cannot be explained away by coincidence.

 

Listen, if you will, to a conversation which went on in the stuffy cabin of a little ship called the Mayflower, as she lay anchored off what is now Provincetown, Massachusetts. It was November 21, 1620: “In the name of God, Amen! We whose names are underwritten, having undertaken for the glory of God and the advancement of the Christian faith, a voyage to plant the first colony – do by these presents, solemnly and mutually, in the presence of God, combine ourselves into a civil body politic.” This was the act which began America.

 

There was a time when one of the requirements for holding office in America was that a man must be a Christian. Then America was a God-fearing nation on her way to greatness. I could take you into the field of capitalism, taxes, monopolies, farming, criminal law, military planning, health, foreign policy, and many other areas and show you how it is disregard for the Law which God gave to Israel, which is now strangling us and destroying our freedom. When we break these God given laws, either as an individual or a nation, the “rod of God’s discipline” falls on us. (Hebrews 12:6) This shows us that God still sits on His throne and still rules in the affairs of men.

 

There are more than 200 Scriptural “fingerprints” which prove who “true Israel” really is. The people we call Jews do not fit a single one; here are 20 of them:

 

1 – Israel was to become a great and mighty nation and a multitude of nations. Gen. 12:2; 18:18;

2 – She was to have a new home. 2 Sam. 7:10; 1 Chron. 17:9.

 

3 – Israel’s home was to be north-west of Palestine. Isa. 49:12; Jer 3:18.

 

4 – Israel was to become a “company of nations.” Gen. 17.4-6, 15, 16, 35.11, 48.19, Eph .2.12.

 

5 – Israel was to colonize and spread abroad. Gen. 28:14; 49:22; Deut. 32:8; 33:17; Psa. 2:81; Isa. 26:15; 27:6; 43;19, 20.

 

6 – Israel was to colonize the desolate places of the earth. Isa. 35:1; 43:19, 20; 49:8; 54:3.

 

7 – Israel was to lose one of her colonies and then expand, demanding room. Isa. 49:19, 20.

 

8 – Israel was to be the number one nation of the world. Gen. 27:29; 28:13; Jer. 31:7.

 

9 – Israel’s home was to be invincible to invasion. 2 Sam 7:10; Isa. 41:11-14.

 

10 – Israel was to be defended by God. Num. 24:8, 9; Isa. 15-17: Micah 5:8, 9

 

11 – Israel was to be an instrument in God’s hand to destroy evil. Jer. 51:20; 51:19-24; Dan. 2:34, 35.

 

12 – Israel was to have great agricultural wealth. (Ask yourself who feeds most of the world, it’s not the Israeli.) Gen. 27:28; Deut. 8:7; 33:13, 14, 28.

 

13 – Israel was to be envied and feared by all nations. Deut. 2:25; 28:10; Isa. 43:4; 60:10, 12; Micah 7:16; Jer. 33:9.

 

14 – Israel was to lend to all nations. Deut. 15:6; 28:12.

 

15 – Israel was to be called by a NEW name. Isa. 62:2; 65:15; Hos 2:17.

 

16 – Israel was to have a new religion (New Covenant). Heb. 8:10-13; 9:17; Matt. 10:5-7; Luke 1:77; 2:32; John 11:49 -52; Gal. 3:15.

 

17 – Israel was to lose all trace of her lineage. Isa. 42:16-19; Hos. 1:9; 2:6; Rom. 11:25.

 

18 – Israelites were to be called the “sons of God, (Christians)” Hot. 1:10-11.

 

19 – Israel was to be saved by the Lord. Deut. 33:27-29; Isa. 41:8; Ezek. 34:10-16; Hosea 2:23; Matt. 15:24; John 10:26, 27.

 

20 – Israel was to carry the Gospel to all the world.

 

(Who prints 98% of all the Bibles; who sends out 98% of all the missionaries?) Gen. 28:14; Isa. 43:10-12, 21; Micah 5:7.

There are many, many more, and not one fits these people we now call Jews.

 

But remember. You were not called to be a dictator, as the Jews are taught. You are not to have 2,000 slaves, as the Talmud tells the Jews they will have. You are called to be a “servant-ruler” people, a “witness-example” to the rest of the nations. You are to bring blessings to all nations and all peoples.

 

When Peter spoke in 1 Peter 2:9 and said: “ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation (notice not church, but nation), a peculiar people; that ye should show forth the praises of Him who hath called you out of darkness into His marvelous light.” He was not speaking to the church, as our preachers have told us. Peter tells us who this message was addressed to in 1 Peter 1:1 – “. . . to the strangers scattered throughout (Asia Minor).” These were the Israel people, your ancestors.

 

Why not check into this truth? It won’t hurt to find out if I am telling the truth. I challenge you to read my tracts and compare them – not with what your pastor teaches, but with the Word of God. I dare you to do this. You could be making one of the most marvelous discoveries of your life; something which could very well change it and prepare you for Christ’s Kingdom on this earth. That was what Jesus told us to pray for, didn’t He? “Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done, IN EARTH AS IT IS IN HEAVEN.” (Emphasis added.) Romans 13:11 tells us: “. . . knowing the time, that it is now high time to awake out of sleep: for now is your salvation nearer than when we believed.”

.

 

 

Posted in Bible Studies | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Donald Trump and Climate Change

Donald Trump and Climate Change

Recently we read that Donald Trump rejected the global warming agenda – and he is right. However, he said that it’s a bad deal for the United States but will it be replaced with something else that will tax us, and, hence, control us?

One thing for sure is that global warming is a hoax. If you go on Youtube you’ll find videos that explains the fraud. There is one video that I’ve seen by some Nobel Laureate exposing it (see below). There are other videos to check out, too.

One thing you can count on is, that whatever the world governments agree on, whatever the newspapers say with one voice on any topic, you can be sure that the opposite is true. Just by checking it out does NOT make you crazy – it makes you wise. Did not King Solomon say he that judges an issue before he hears it is a fool? Unfortunately, most people are – yet they profess to be so wise. But what did God say about this? He said that the wise of the earth is foolishness with Him.

Anyhow, for those who don’t believe me, check out this global warming video first. For those who do believe that it’s a hoax, make notes of what this man said in the video (and in other videos) to use this when talking to friends on the subject.

I encourage you to do more research and find out about the climate change hoax – just type in the relevant keywords in Google or do your search on Youtube.

 

 

Posted in Fake Science, media lies, mind control | Tagged , , | Leave a comment