A Lecture on Gravity Given 100 Years Ago

A Lecture on Gravity Given 100 Years Ago

 

From The Earth Volume III

On Tuesday evening, July 1st, a lecture on “The Plane Earth Truth” was delivered at Craftsman’s Club, Birmingham.

Great interest was manifest throughout my address. I explained briefly the common belief as to the Earth being a “globe” turning on its imaginary axis from West to East, with the inevitable consequences of everything being periodically turned upside down.

One man said if we got too near the edge we might fall off the earth. This greatly amused the chairman and caused much laughter.

I then briefly explained the beliefs of planists which are based (1st) upon the statements as set forth in the Scriptures, and (2nd) upon the evidence of their senses, and practical investigation. After dwelling for some time on the undeniable fact that water is level, the sun’s motions (which we may all behold) I exhibited a map of the earth as an outstretched plane, published by the late D. Wardlaw Scott.

Questions were asked about gravitation, and if there was no such law why bodies fell to the earth? I suddenly dropped a piece of paper, and asked them why it fell to the floor? No reply. I repeated my question, “Why did it fall?” they said it was because of “gravity.” But one said, “that means weight. Where is the weight?” (Laughter.) Another said, “Oh, there are forces in nature of which we are at present unaware.” They could not define “ gravitation,” and were in a greater fix when I asked them why a balloon rose in the air? “ Had ‘ gravitation ’ lost its power over a little bit of earth, silk, rope, &c.” One gentleman said it was because certain gases had a law peculiar to themselves, and the gas in the balloon was one of them. Then I asked, “Has one gas the power of robbing ‘gravitation’ of its force?” Next I told them “the reason why the paper fell is because it is heavier than the air, and the reason a balloon rises, is because it is lighter, and when it has risen to the height of its own density there it remains until it is relieved of weight or ballast, or the gas is loosed out of the bag. The company being satisfied with this explanation the meeting was reluctantly brought to a close, and I received a cordial vote of thanks for m}’ “entertaining address;” the President remarking that “it seemed that we had accepted much on this subject, from boyhood, without questioning its truth, and that there was much food for thought in the teaching of a plane and motionless earth.”
J. JONES, Jun.

Posted in Gravity, Old flat earth news | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Delivering Men From Sorcery

Delivering Men From Sorcery

Question: Is it possible to deliver men from sorcery?

Answer: Only if what is called scientific and it’s exposed as a lie and that person repents.

How many people believe without question what is said simply because it was written by a ‘great man’ in academia? How many thousands believe at once without proof? Is it not as hard to turn men from the worship of their fellow man, as a Hindoo worships sticks and stones? The scientific favourites of newspaper scribblers are larded over with flattery until the reputation of greatness is attained; and to argue against pet scientific fictions is only to provoke silly jesting or astonishment at the presumption of daring to differ from the scientific slave-drivers. Will any of their slaves of science dare to be free, or use their common-sense ?

“Is geology not a tissue of suppositions from beginning to end? Let us see. How do the Geologists manage to get dupes? Some disguised infidel who has had sufficient influence to obtain a professorship in a college writes a book about the Creation, in which he attempts to prove to the entire satisfaction of atheistic journalists that the world made itself without the help of God at all. Of course the blasphemous character of the book is carefully veiled, lest soft-headed religionists take alarm, and the book does not sell.

Perhaps even a pious whine is dropped so that the work of Judas may be done more effectually; and the author is reputed a very great man, for all the newspapers say it. By way of preface astronomy is appealed to as a science so well established that none but fools object to it; therefore, the reader must imagine all the vast continents and oceans making up a ball no larger than the school room globe. Next he is assured that recent researches in science have proved that those lights, the sun, moon, and stars, consist of the very same constituents as the earth and sea, as well as the nebula?, which science supposes to be clouds of glowing gas.

So all these must have had a common origin, and, therefore, the simpleton must next imagine the school room globe along with sun, moon, and stars, changed , into a quantity of fiery gas. In the beginning—how many million years ago science cannot yet decide—was gas, is the dogma of Geologists. He dare not ask about the origin of the gas itself.

Then the mesmerist requires him to suppose that all the fiery mass very conveniently began to cool, particularly a quantity in the centre, which also whirled about until it became the sun.

“The victim of duplicity is next to suppose that other quantities also cooled until they changed into planets. Especially one quantity went on cooling until it conveniently became the earth ball with a rocky crust, and though on fire originally, yet a portion of it changed into all the oceans and seas. ‘In the study of science,’ says Dr. Dick in his book on Geology, ‘one is permitted to suppose anything if he will but remember and acknowledge to others that he only makes suppositions; will give reasons to show that his suppositions may be true, and be ready at any time to give up his suppositions when facts go against them. The last of these two suppositions, namely, the gradual cooling of the world from a state of intense heat, is often made by those who wish to form to themselves a notion of how the rocks and rivers, mountains and plains of the world have been brought to exist as they are.’ Can the foolish Geologists, instead of making these absurd suppositions, not believe the fact that God made the world as stated on God’s own authority? Instead, however, of opening their eyes they further suppose that despite the cooling, as much fire remained inside the ball as heaved up the rocky crust into mountain chains, whilst the waters went on channelling and levelling so as to make all the river and ocean beds. Then the rivers would carry down to lakes and seas matter containing animal and vegetable remains to form sediment, which we must suppose hardened after millions of years into rocks, especially the stratified ones, the un-stratified rock being supposed due to the original fire. All these atheistic suppositions are expressed in words of Greek origin so as to amaze the gaping simpleton. The rocks immediately above the un-stratified are called metamorphic. Next in ascending order are the Paleozoic or primary,the mesozoic or secondary, the Cainozoic including the tertiary and quaternary. The guesses about fossils make up Palaontology.

“Now let it be observed that not one of these suppositions is even probable. Whoever saw gas changed into granite, or a fiery vapour into water, or a river channel its own bed? Is there within the memory of mankind one considerable mountain more or less on the earth—notwithstanding volcanic eruptions and earthquakes—one considerable country more or less, or what continent has materially changed its shape?

What do fossils prove? The following is a confession from Skertchly’s Geology, page 101: ‘So imperfect is the record of the earth’s history’, as told in these rocks, that we can never hope to fill up completely all the gaps in the chain of life. The testimony of the rocks has been well compared to a history of which only a few imperfect volumes remain to us, the missing portions of which we can only fill up by conjecture. What botanist but would despair of restoring the vegetation of wood and field from the dry leaves that Autumn scatters? Yet from less than this the Geologist has to form all his ideas of past floras. Can we wonder then at the imperfection of the geological world?’ Indeed it is confessed that the age of the fossil is not determined by the degree of its petrifaction, but by the age of the rock in which it is embedded; and the age of the rock by its position among the strata. Have men in these last days become so still that with old bones and stones, and footmarks, they may be led to deny the very God that made them? But was not this folly foretold ages ago by the inspired Hebrew prophets?

Posted in Heliocentric Atheism | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Shape Of The Lamps Do Not Dictate The Shape Of The Room

The Shape Of The Lamps Do Not Dictate The Shape Of The Room

  Astronomers say that because the sun, moon, and planets are globular, therefore the Earth must be globular; but they may as well say that,as the lamps in the room in which the meeting was being held were globular, therefore the room itself was globular. There was nothing to show that the Earth is one of the heavenly bodies, or that any of those heavenly bodies are “worlds.” The words in Hebrews i. 2, and xi. 3, translated “ the worlds,” are totis aioias (the ages), whereas in Hebrews i. 6, the terms, translated “ the world,” differ and signify’ “ the inhabited earth.”

It is deception of the worst kind to say that the Earth is one of the heavenly bodies; but God has divided light from darkness, and day from night, by means of the heavenly bodies. Modern pseudo science annuls the Word of God, and no wonder the agnostic asks: “What have you got to say for your Bible, and in defence of its veracity?”

The Copernican professing Christian finds the question to be quite unanswerable, and to such an one the Bible ceases to be “ The Bedrock of Truth.” We on the other hand take our stand upon the Impregnable Rock of Holy Scripture.

Present-day scientists, who adopted the anti-biblical theory of the world being a globe, had kept altering the distance of the sun from the Earth from hundreds to millions of miles, whilst accepting the theory that we are rushing through space at the awful rate of about 63,000 miles an hour. The Church of Rome has shown herself up, because if it be true that she never alters—being semper eadeni (always the same)—why did she persecute Galileo for saying that the Earth moves, and that very Church now accepts the teaching that the Earth is rushing through space at the rate of over 1,000 miles a minute? If that Church was right in the beginning she was wrong now. The ancient Catholic Church evidently believed in the Mosaic account of Creation; but she has departed from primitive teaching and gone so far as to render the Word of God of no effect, doing away with the Sabbath as a memorial of the Creation, “May the Lord help us, and lead us into all truth!”

When scientists say that the moon and the sun is round and says this is proof that the earth is round is like saying, “Because the lamps are round, the room that they shine in is round, too,” is utter nonsense; the shape of one has nothing to do with the shape of the other!

 

Posted in Sun Moon Stars | Tagged , | Leave a comment

History of Political Correctness

History of Political Correctness

Political correctness is not only found in race relations but also in religion when it comes to Christianity. As you know, no one is offended by Christian teaching and that is because it’s so water downed that it offends no one. Yet, Christ offended many in His day.

Political correctness comes into play in science, as well; as Paul said, “science so-called.” When you hear about the the geocentric model of the universe – it’s political correctness – as they don’t want you to believe in a Creator God but in evolution. Anyhow, here is a video about the history of political correctness.

.

Posted in Conspiracies, Fake Science | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Literal Truth of Creation

Literal Truth of Creation

To Him that stretched out the Earth above the Waters; for His mercy endureth for ever,”—Psa. 136:6

It may be thought that there are a sufficient number of Periodicals in the market without adding one more to the extensive list. There are plenty no doubt, if they were all of the right kind. But are they?

How many of them profess to stand by the Word of God as true and faithful in all its parts. And of those who profess to uphold the sacred Scriptures as inspired of God, how many believe and advocate the literal truth of the account of Creation as recorded therein or the various descriptions given by them of the works of God as found in what is called Nature? Not one! At least, we know not of any.

Not a single Christian Editor who in the face of the so-called “ Science ’’ of the 21st century dare contend for the literal truth of the Bible text given at the heading of this paper? We repeat it, we know of none. We know of many, and some loud in their profession that they believe the Bible to be the inspired Word of God, who yet have declined to allow us, or our friends, to uphold in their columns the literal truth of the Bible in all its references to the material Creation. We deplore this fact; and hence the necessity has been laid upon us, with all our weakness, physically or numerically, to come to the rescue. God is able to use the weakest instrumentality to his own glory, and to the confusion of the enemies of his truth. Our trust is in God; and in the faithfulness of his Word, in all its teachings from Genesis to Revelation. Our (motto is, Let God be true, though every man be a liar.)
If Genesis is not to be relied upon, in its description of Creation, how shall we trust Exodus? If the Old Testament is not true, what will become of the New? If the Creator, through his servants, the prophets has not correctly described his Works, how can we trust him for our salvation? As the great Teacher, who came from God, himself declared; “If ye believe not his (Moses) writings, how shall ye believe my words?”

These are questions I would like to present to other flat earth believers who call themselves agnostics. After coming to the realization of the flat earth, they have to accept God and they even quote the Bible in support of the flat earth, so the go from being an atheist to an agnostic. Yet, they deny the rest of the Bible!

They stand or fall together. Our Lord says so; and every logical and candid mind must see it is so. We are prepared to accept the conclusion for we feel sure that no fact in nature is contrary to Bible teaching.

It is well-known that the teachings of modern Astronomy are opposed to the teachings of the Bible; but it is not so well understood that all known facts in nature are in harmony with Bible representations. Thomas Paine, in his so-called “Age of Reason” says :— “ The two beliefs ”—Modern Astronomy and the Bible—“ cannot be held together in the same mind: he who thinks he believes both has thought very little of either.”

This witness is true here. But he makes the very common mistake of assuming, or supposing, that Astronomy must be true; and hence he draws the unwarrantable conclusion that the Bible must be false. This is not “reason,” but assumption; and is surely an unpardonable offence against good logic on the part of one who professes to “ reason ” We call the attention of our sceptical friends to its inconclusiveness. Give us facts, or sound “reasons” based on facts, and we will listen to our opponents with attention; but it will be the province of Christian Flat Earth Ministry to expose from time to time the flimsy pretexts for reason which so frequently are placed before us by those who oppose the Word of the living God on questions of Cosmology.

We want the facts of Science, not in its every varying theories and contradictions. For these facts we shall ever be glad to find room, in proportion to their importance and our space. But, we candidly confess at the outset that we do not know of any one fact in Nature which conflicts with the accounts of the Creation or Universe, as set forth in the Holy Scriptures. The God of Creation or of Nature, is the God of Revelation; and both these we believe to be in harmony. These harmonies we propose to show to our readers as we have opportunity in future numbers of our little paper.

We invite our friends, all over the outstretched earth, to come forward and help us. They can strengthen our hands with means and with matter. Short, pointed, and pithy articles, or letters—written” on one side of the paper only—and sent to the Editor, will receive careful attention.

 

Posted in Bible and Flat Earth | Tagged | 2 Comments

The Heavens Declare His Glory

The Heavens Declare His Glory

The inspired Psalmist says that “The heavens declare of glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handwork”; therefore, whatever some professed Christians affirm to the contrary, the subject of Creation is connected with the right views of God, his worship, and his glory. But if we should have a right conception of God, and his glory, we must see to it that we have a right conception of his works in Creation. How, for instance, do we obtain an insight into the character of any great man, whether he be a poet, politician, sculptor, general or king? It is not by his acts or his works? This is what Christian Flat Earth Ministry is endeavouring to do.

But suppose these acts, or works, are misrepresented to us, or defaced by someone, should we not have , false and distorted views respecting the author, artist, or the maker of those things?

Assuredly. And so it comes to pass in respect to the construction of the world, false views of the universe have led men into a misconception respecting the Character of God, and even alas! In many cases, to a denial of the very existence of such a personal Being.

Let us, then, endeavour to come back to first principles. The world exists, and must have come from somewhere. It is “unthinkable” to say it came by chance, or any “ fortuitous concourse of atoms.” Its wonderful variety, the general co-relation and adaptability of its various parts, and the exact and never failing motions of all the heavenly bodies, prove, to any well-balanced and unprejudiced mind, that some grand and controlling Intelligence directs and rules over all. As the apostle Paul declares, “The invisible things of Him from the creation to the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead : so that they are without excuse.” Rom. i. 20.

A grand truth lies in this statement of the apostle. Paul was no fool. It is allowed on all sides, alike by friend and foe, Sceptic and that no one man has had more influence in forming Christianity, the history of which has for eighteen centuries been making the history of the civilized world, than the apostle Paul. His name will be had in honour when the names of the adversaries of the truth will have sunk into merited and everlasting oblivion. And this great man agrees with the Psalmist in teaching that the Creation, as set forth in the Bible, and as found in what some call “Nature,” sets forth unmistakably the grand truth that God is. Now, this is a fundamental verity, and the foundation of all true faith, God is. And “he that cometh to God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of them that diligently seek Him.” Now, this faith is, on the one hand, neither an unreasoning credulity, nor, on the other hand, is it a bigoted (It is based on an intelligent and reasonable understanding of the things that are seen above and around us.)

The Book of Nature is open to all men; but it must be read and studied without prejudice and without philosophical bias. We must come to it like little children, with the honest desire to know the truth, and not attempt to read into it our own, nor anyone else’s, plausible or implausible hypotheses. If we do this patiently and persistently, we shall be “rewarded ”: the grand and ineffaceable truth will dawn upon us that God is.

We shall see His glory in the bright and blazing sun as he goes forth majestically, like a giant, to run his daily course. We shall own its Power and Godhead when the moon, queen of the night, rises in quiet and stately splendour, to reflect her silver radiance in every rippling stream. And we shall confess His wisdom and unfailing skill when, at night, we gaze up into the firmament and behold ten thousand glittering gems, shining in matchless beauty, and shedding upon the earth their silent influences, as they nightly perform their appointed revolutions.

Truly we shall then confess with the Psalmist, that “ the heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament sheweth His handiwork.”

“The firmament sheweth His handiwork.’’ That vast and incomparable structure which spans the heavens, and covers the earth with its capacious dome, divides the waters which are “above” the firmament from the waters which are “ under ” the firmament. And when we realize something of the tremendous size of this tent-like covering, spanning with one mighty arch across the whole of the outstretched earth ; when we considered its weight, its strength, its stability, and the avowed purpose for which it was made by the Creator, we can unhesitatingly and devoutly again exclaim with the Psalmist, “The firmament sheweth His handiwork.”

No wonder such a “work ” occupied the whole of one day, the third, in the “ great and marvellous ” work of the six days Creation. Job, one of the finest, and certainly one of the most ancient, of true philosophers, when comparing the works of God with the puny works of man, asks :

Hast thou with Him spread out the sky, which is strong, and as a molten looking glass ? ” Job 37; 18

It is, perhaps, this mirror-like quality which the firmament possesses that makes unbelieving “scientists ” think that they can, with their glasses, peer into what they call “space,” which they affirm to be “ boundless.” As well might a child, gazing upon the bosom of a glassy lake, affirm that it had no bottom, and that the sky and clouds, reflected from its placid surface, were slumbering in the unfathomed depths below, and not above, its waters.

The idea of illimitable “space,” filled with an infinity of revolving worlds or globes, is not only a bewildering idea, unfounded on fact, but it directly tends to remove the Creator, or rather the idea of a Creator, far, and farther, away from this earthly plane of ours. It necessarily and logically leads to Atheism; and too often, it practically leads men there. The idea of Heaven as a place, the abode of The Eternal, becomes to the logical and thinking Newtonian a myth; and God, if he acknowledge such a personal Being at all, becomes farther and farther removed from the scene of all earthly operations. Whereas the Saviour of the World, who “came down from Heaven,” to do his Father’s will, taught His disciples to believe that Heaven was not very far off; that it was directly and always “above ” us ; that God was concerned in the work of His hands; and that as “ our Father,” He was near enough to hear the prayers of all those who call upon him in sincerity and truth.

This is assuring: this is comforting. God cares for the world; and He will punish those who afflict mankind with their selfishness, their greed, their falsehoods, and their oppressions. Yea, God has “ so loved the world”—not the “ globe,” as some misguided Christians have lately printed and perverted this sublime text with a ridiculous “ globe” stamped on the paper—God “ so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.” This, we say, is comforting. It is assuring. But, on the astronomical hypothesis, the world is like an uncared-for orphan, or a desolate wanderer: God is removed too far from us to be any practical use; and the idea of Heaven is so vague, that such a place, if it exist at all, may be anywhere or nowhere; “all round the globe;” or spirited away from us altogether, “beyond the bounds of time and space.” Thus the Christian’s hope is undermined, and his faith is eaten away at the very core by this insidious and so-called “scientific” worm. This is most calamitous; yet even some of our “spiritual guides ” are either so false to their professions, or are so deceived themselves, that they cry out, “ It does not matter what shape the earth is ; we don’t care whether it be round or flat, square or oblong, so long as ’—yes, so long as they get a good “ living,” and hold a respectable position in society? Is this it? Such a confession really means, when put into plain language. We do not care whether the Bible be true or false, in its record of Creation, so long as our interests or our hope of “Salvation” is assured. But “woe” is pronounced against such easy going shepherds of Israel. “ Woe” to them who are leaving their flocks to become a prey to the devouring wolves of “Science, ” “ falsely so called,” as the great apostle intimates. Let us be on our guard.

There are honourable exceptions to such false shepherds and teachers, and others are being raised up to warn us. We have quoted some of their noble testimonies. Let us give heed to these needful warnings.

God has never left Himself without witnesses to His Truth whether in Nature or in Revelation. We may shew this, if the Lord permits, more fully another time as regards Creation truth.

In conclusion, we would call the attention of all our readers to the seasonable warning given us by the Apostle Paul, where he says;— ‘‘Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ” Col. 2 : 8. And again, Let us “prove all things ; and hold fast that which is good.”

 

Posted in Bible and Flat Earth | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Stephen Hawking: Zero Gravity Simulation

Stephen Hawking and Globe Earth

We are to believe that Stephen Hawking is one of the smartest people in the world. Well, consider this:

  There are other anomalies as well. He has managed to live with ALS up until the grand old age of 73, even though most people are diagnosed in their 50’s and die within five years. He was diagnosed with motor neuron disease when he was just 21 years old. How has he managed to fend off this disease for over fifty years, without even needing a breath ventilator? Nobody knows. We are supposed to believe this outstanding genius could not read until he was eight and had mediocre grades in school. Then there is the question of his voice synthesizer and cheek twitching.

Here’s how “Stephen” says his computer works:

“Since 1997, my computer-based communication system has been sponsored and provided by Intel® Corporation. A tablet computer mounted on the arm of my wheelchair is powered by my wheelchair batteries, although the tablets internal battery will keep the computer running if necessary.

“Through EZ Keys I can also control the mouse in Windows. This allows me to operate my whole computer. I can check my email using the Eudora email client, surf the internet using Firefox, or write lectures using Notepad. My latest computer from Intel, based on an Intel® Core™ i7 Processor and Intel® Solid-State Drive 520 Series, also contains a webcam which I use with Skype to keep in touch with my friends. I can express a lot through my facial expressions to those who know me well.

“I can also give lectures. I write the lecture beforehand and save it on disk. I can then send it to the speech synthesiser a sentence at a time using the Equalizer software written by Words Plus. It works quite well and I can try out the lecture and polish it before I give it.”

http://www.hawking.org.uk/the-computer.html

We are to believe he can do all that. If that wasn’t enough, we have Hawking put in zero gravity. And with Stephen Hawking in the picture (literally) people are led to believe the earth is a globe speeding through the universe. Of course, you don’t question a man like Stephen Hawking or you are nuts.

Yea, sure!

Posted in Fake Science | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Is Stephen Hawking Dead, a Double or an Illuminati Puppet?

Is Stephen Hawking Dead, a Double or an Illuminati Puppet?

Here is something to consider, then decide for yourself.

.

You can do more research on your own by typing in YouTube search box words such as: “Stephen Hawking exposed”, or “Stephen Hawking fraud”

Posted in Fake Science | Tagged | Leave a comment

Stephen Hawking and the Flat Earth

Stephen Hawking and the Flat Earth

  While Stephen Hawking said nothing of the flat earth he was reporting in saying we have to move to the moon and Mars.

The UK The Daily Telegraph, page 4, 21 June, 2017, is a headline saying:

We must start evacuating Earth within decades, says Hawking

It goes on to say that the earth faces dire problems such as: global warming and over population, etc. Hawking went on to say that we have 30 years before world-wide catastrophe! Can you believe such non-sense?

First, as you know, it’s a question if this guy and can think of anything – seriously. He can’t move, he can’t speak, he can’t communicate in anyway, so how can he have said all this? Yes, we are told that he can communicate with his computer. Yea, sure. How? Did take a look at this, what looks like a 1980s piece of electronic instrument? But I digress, as another article could be written on this.

Here are the points that were brought in what he told a audience recently:

we are running out of resources
over population
climate change
we will be hit by a devastating asteroid

For those who believe in a heliocentric universe and what Stephen Hawking says, consider this:

If we are running out of resources (which we probably are), where will we get all of this to go from the primitive state we are in now to manning colonies on the moon and Mars? We would need a huge amount of rare earth minerals and we will have to develop other technology that would require living on these other “planets.”

Hawking believes in climate change, which is a hoax, but that would require a book to cover that, too.

Finally, Stephen Hawking, who must have a crystal ball, says we will be hit with a devastating asteroid. Even taking in his “probability,” of it happening, how would he know that it will be (by implication) within the life time of anyone living now or even in the grandchildren of the youngest people living?

For flat earth believers and for those who really know the Bible, this is not how the world will end. In fact, the world will not end but be made new. Only this Age will end but not the end of time or the end of earth. Heliocentric believers live in fear and they also fall for every lie that the Establishment puts out. Have you ever noticed that everything that Stephen Hawking says is acceptable to what science – falsely called – believes? Hawking is just made a big media figure as if he was modern-day Einstein.

.

 

Posted in Planets, Sun Moon Stars | Tagged | 3 Comments

Creation versus Salvation Or Illogical Christians

CREATION versus SALVATION OR ILLOGICAL CHRISTIANS

We are often advised by well-meaning Christians, who are ignorant of the bearings of our contention, to allow the subject of the plane earth to “drop,” and to join with them in proclaiming what they are pleased to call “ the gospel.” As we are going to press we have received another

gratuitous piece of advice of the same nature. Our friend writes :— “ You believe the earth is flat and stands still. I may give it a passing notice. I am surprised to find a man of so much intelligence and learning should persist in such notions. Is it not a clear fact that we can determine the approximate size of the globe? And if you go in a straight line in any direction you will come to the place from which you started, and how do you account for the Seasons, and the difference in the length of the days at different Seasons ; and tidal motions, etc. I think you would be better engaged in helping to swell the world-wide cry of the Gospel. Don’t you think so?”

In answer to the last question we say decidedly, No! not at the expense of leaving off teaching the plain truth. It is undeniable that the Holy Scriptures teach that the Earth is stationary; that it rests on

“ foundations” and ‘‘ pillars” ; and that it is “ established so fast that it cannot be moved.” (The book of Mormon is not part of Scripture and it would take a long article to go into that, which will get us off tract of the subject I herein want to cover.)

We therefore contend that if, as some of our Christian friends would have us believe, the Bible is not true in its material teachings respecting the Universe, it is not reliable in its promises of spiritual blessings. But we maintain that the Bible is true; true to fact and to every day observation ; and that the earth does not move. In future numbers we hope to give good proofs of the earth’s immobility for those who need them ; but in the meantime we have a right to ask for some one proof, and we only ask for one, of the earth’s supposed terrible motions? It appears stationary. It feels stationary. Then why should we give up the evidence of our God-given senses for the sake of a mere astronomical and unsupported assumption?

There is much more behind this question of the shape of the earth than our good natured but illogical advisers are aware of. If we are credited, as we are by those who know us, with at least an average share of common sense, and a little more than the average amount of “intelligence and learning,” how is it that our advisers—who for the most part have never really studied the question—how is it they cannot credit us with understanding this subject, which I have studied, and with

understanding its importance as supplying a good foundation for our confidence in the sure Word of God ? We maintain that if the Bible is not true respecting the material Creation, it is not reliable it its promises of Salvation ; and that it is perfectly useless to preach the Gospel of Jesus the Christ to men who have lost their faith in the inspiration, or truthfulness, of the Word of God- It is, moreover, a great pity when Christian friends unite with sceptical foes in support of a godless science, falsely

called “ science, ” which strikes at the very foundation of the truth of the Creator’s Word. They incur a grave responsibility in so doing. Let them take heed.

In answer to our correspondents questions, we say. It is not “ a clear fact that we can determine the approximate size of the globe.” It is not a clear fact that the earth is a globe at all. Let proof be offered.

And again, it is not possible “ to go in a straight line in any direction, and come back to the place of starting.” Any straight line ” is an impossibility on a spherical surface. But apart from this self-evident fact, no one has ever travelled or voyaged due North, or due South, and come hack to the same place again. The great ice barriers would prevent this.

Yet our correspondent thoughtlessly says, “in any direction”! Men can go round the World in an easterly or a westerly direction ; but this is also possible on a plane. Hence it is no proof of the earth’s spherical shape. But our opponents do not seem to be able to discriminate in these things. It is the fault, doubtless, of our system of “ education,” which crams young minds with other men’s ideas, instead of teaching them to think for themselves, and to think cautiously and accurately.

Let us hope that The Earth Review will help, at least, to raise enquiry, and so teach men to think for themselves; and not to leave all their thinking to professional and interested preachers of science.

There is an evident need of such a paper as ours, even apart from its advocacy of the truth of the Bible, if only to awaken candid enquiry. Let us hope that all lovers of truth—natural truth or spiritual—and all lovers of original ideas, possessing true freedom of thought, will rally round us, and help us on towards a world-wide circulation of The Earth Review.

Now, this is a new one for me and that is, that some people think that the universe is a ball but the earth is flat. Now, figure that one out! And, that the earth is stationary but the other planets are moving at enormous speed. I won’t get into this as it’s really not worth my time to argue it, as I could make many valid points.

 

Posted in flat earth discussion, Flat Earth Questions | Tagged | 1 Comment