The Supposed Circumnavigation of Earth

The Supposed Circumnavigation of Earth

Sea Earth Globe 6

Many people foolishly imagine that ships can sail in a
straight line due E. or W, ; but if a line be drawn, all round
a sphere, it would make a circle, a chalk mark round a football
for instance. A circle is not a straight line, as I once had
reason to remind an educated gentleman in a public debate.
He was known, too, as “ the Leicester astronomer!”

In the above figure the magnetic north “pole” is represented
at N ; and if a ship, sailing round the outer circumference,
keeps the point of the compass always towards N,
and steers at right-angles to it the course described will be
a circle.

A small flat island could be circumnavigated in the same
way, with a powerful magnet in the middle of the island ;
the ship thus describing a circle. But if a vessel took a
straight line course from A, it would sail in the south-westerly
direction towards S.W.

On a globe it would be impossible for the horizontal needle
always to point to the north magnetic “ pole ” from different
parts of a spherical sea, as anyone may prove by laying a
needle at various points as a tangent to a large ball. But
on a flat surface the needle always points to the centre
while the ship describes a circle— which double fact not only
again explodes the globular theory, but establishes the truth
of a plane earth and sea!

We have years ago many times pointed out this fact in
our literature, and as a result one professor has had the
honesty to make the following confession;

“The earth has been circumnavigated a great many times…
We can (we could ?) journey round the globe, sometimes travelling on
land, and sometimes on the sea. This would appear to be
a certain proof that the earth’s surface is curved. Nevertheless it has
been pointed out that circumnavigation would be possible if the earth
had A FLAT SURFACE with the north magnetic pole at its centre.
A compass needle then, would always point to the centre of the surface,
and so a ship might sail due east and west, as indicated by the compass,
and eventually return to the same point by describing a circle.” (Caps,
mine.) Prof. R.A. Gregory, F.R.A.S., Elementary Physiography’.
Yet thoughtless teachers still refer to the schoolboy proof
that circumnavigation proves the earth a globe!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Three Pole Trick

The Three Pole Trick

Sea Earth Globe 5a

We have been authoritatively assured that the curvature
of water can be proved by three poles, and a notable incident
is referred to on the Bedford Canal, Cambridgeshire.
“If three poles of exactly the same height be placed in a line, the
middle one always appears higher than the other two outer ones.
If a telescope be sighted along the first to the third pole, the
top of the middle pole will appear above the line joining the tops of
the two outer ones.” (Italics mine.) Elem. Phys., by R. A. Gregory,
F.R.A.S.

The above paragraph is vague and specious. What is
meant by sighting the telescope “ along ” the first pole to
the third ? Is it. here the trick conies in ? The third pole,
being farthest off, will appear perspectively smaller ; and
the first will not be seen at all if the glass be laid “ along ”
the top of it. The telescope should be placed at some
distance away from the firs pole, when the line of sight
would be found running along the level tops of each pole.
Refer to figures 14 and 15. ‘ The line of sight from A to C
is not parallel to a line tangential at A ; but it ought to be
if there be no trick of collimation in the telescope.
But suppose pole B seems higher than C. Shift the glass
“ along ” B, and add a fourth pole at D, equally high and
distant. Now pole C “ will always ” appear higher than
pole B ; so that C is both lower and higher than B ! Which
is absurd, as Eculid says. Q.E.D.

When the noted wager was tried on the Bedford Canal,
the lens should have been turned half-way round to test
whether there was any “ trick ” in the telescope; but
J. Hampden was not sufficiently sharp. Sir A. R. Wallace
was doubtless honest, but the glass may have tricked him 1
Through a friend I sent him a challenge to shew in print
HOW the bet was won, promising to reply courteously ;
but to me he never replied. Hence of that incident we may
write R.I.P. But I retain copies of the official photographs
taken at the time, in case any other globite cares to pick up
my glove.

My friend “ Parallax ” (Dr. Rowbottam) had tried many
experiments on that canal between 1838 and 1862; and
after the bet affair he again went and carefully tested the
water for six miles, with various powerful telescopes. He
found the surface perfectly level, as before; and his
experiments have several times been pubhshed, but never
refuted. Yet, the canal is still there!
For proof “How they cook science,” see the London
Daily Chronicle, Jan. 14th, 1893.

Sea Earth Globe 5b

The above figure 15 illustrates the supposed curvature
when, as is often the case in clear weather, a great extent
of sea surface is visible looking in opposite directions, say
25 miles each way. This should give a dip of 420 feet on
each side. If the sea were globular, the curvature of its
surface ought to be plainly visible, especially from a balloon,
for a sweep of 50 miles, looking both ways; but no such
curvature has ever been seen, even for longer stretches,
but only one vast and uniform level, rising perspectively to
the eye-line. See figure 15b, and compare it with any good
sea-scape. Fig. 15a shews what ought to be seen from a
balloon (E) if the sea were globular.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Communism By The Back Door

Communism By The Back Door

Home sale 2What is happening now in the UK and the US

There is a move about to buy property by certain trillion dollar corporations who are paying 20% – 50% over market value. In the US, it is being done by Blackrock and Vanguard and it’s being done by other corporations in other countries, too.

Talking from personal experience, my wife and I are looking to buy property. When you go online and find a home, you can see what similar homes have sold for in the same neighbourhood in the past year. One of the best places to do this is Zoopla.com What we discovered is, that some homes have sold for up too 90% more with the average price up 45% in the past year! No one pays those prices unless it’s big corporations with deep pockets.

Also, what has transpired in the UK in the past year is that there has been a huge increase in “lease hold” where you don’t own the property but only rent. In effect, these properties are taken off the market and put back on as rental property. And, you have to pay ground rent, too.

Why are these pension trust fund corporations doing this? So, they can charge you rent. With the prices they are paying, your rent will be like a mortgage and you won’t own anything. (Remember Klaus Swab saying, “You will own nothing but you will be happy.”)

apartment rent 2The government of the West have not been so bold as to say it’s illegal to own property so they do it by the back door and you pay rent.

With artificially high prices like this, many people would not be able to buy a home – especially first home buyers. When you can’t afford property it’s like not being allowed to own it.

We just looked at a property that was very reasonable and it sold in four days after it was on the market. My aunt’s home went in 2.5 hours. In these two cases they were private buyers – they were fortunate. But there are face-less corporations that are buying up homes, too. One out of seven homes in the US is bought by a corporation.

This is what I call “Communism by the backdoor,” where everyone is forced to be renters. If you have cash in the bank, two things can go wrong. 1 The money can be devalued; 2 The rent will increase astronomically and you’ll have no choice but to pay it.

With the expected currency resent coming, the money you have in the bank that would normally be used to buy a home will be used to pay the rent. You won’t be able to get out of it as the price for a home will be out of reach. If the rent goes up – which it certainly will – you’ll have to pay it, as you can’t afford to move. The other homes for rent will either be owned by the same corporation or by another one but keep in mind, they all work together.

The very latest UK news is, that another Communist law was just passed, where if you own another home, you’ll have to pay 3% of the value of the home you are selling – even if you are in the process of moving – because you own two properties at that time. It’s a form of penalty for own two properties – even if it’s for a short time. Now, you can claim this back but what is to stop the MPs from changing the law where you can’t! And, what about the hard worker who happens to own more than one property and having the other one as a holiday home or simply as a source of income?

Solution

The only solution that I see is, to move out of your so-called “leader of the free world” country to one where you really have more freedom; where you can own a home that you can afford. The money you get for your home here will go much further in a second-world country. You would have enough money left over to start a business, too. In short, if finances permit, MOVE before it’s too late.

Copyright 2021 CIC

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 3 Comments

Curvature Or Dip?

Curvature Or Dip?

In calculating the amount of curvature, or dip below the
eye-line of the observer, we have a simple rule, ignoring some
small decimal points, namely:— Square the number of miles
given as the distance, and multiply the product by eight
inches, and divide by twelve, which will give in feet the depth
of the dip from the observer’s line of sight. This is true
for a globe of 25,000 miles circumference ; thus in six miles
there would be a dip of 24 feet, and in twelve miles a dip of
96 feet.

Sea Earth Globe 4

But in calculating the depth of the dip, zetetics often have
made an unnecessary concession to the globularist, by
deducting from the distance of the object the place of the
, point where the eye-line is supposed to move downwards to
touch the earth, or the level of the water. This is a concession
to the false views of perspective given in school books, such
as we have illustrated in our Fig. 11, and to which the student
can turn. Y e t in spite of this unnecessary concession,
zetetics have shown that distant objects are often visible
when they ought to be out of sight, and a long way below
the horizon, if the sea be globular!

If we turn to the laws of true perspective, as already given,
we shall see that this deduction is not only unnecessary, but
that, moreover, the height of the observer should in strictness
be added to the amount of dip.

Let us turn to Fig. 14 to illustrate this fact. Let the
point E represent the position of the observer on the sea-level;
his line of sight would be a tangent to the sphere at
the place of observation, as shewn by the line E H, and the
dip of an object at J would be represented by the line H J.
Now raise the observer to the height of the telescope at F;
his line of sight is still a horizontal line in the direction of G,
and parallel to E H, therefore the dip from G to J is mani
festly greater than that from H to J. And this is true
whether we reckon the dip towards the centre of the globe
in the direction of G L, or at right-angles from the line of
sight G M.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 2 Comments

Nuclear Hoax – Nukes Do Not Exist

Nuclear Hoax – Nukes Do Not Exist

Notice Eric Dubay is not a Christian but that does not mean he is wrong on other issues. Just like others we know who don’t know anything about Christianity but are right on certain issues. Watch this video and judge for yourself.

Click Here

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 2 Comments

Ships Climbing Both Ways

Ships Climbing Both Ways

In figure 11 we have shown an illustration used to support
the false perspective, and false teaching, of the schools ;
but while some of the higher class astronomical books do not
disgrace their pages with such a palpable monstrosity, their
teachings are in agreement therewith, and some of their
diagrams equally faulty.

Sea Earth Globe 2

Let an observer be placed on, some small island in midocean,
as represented in figure 12, where he can watch ships
sail away from him in opposite directions: now if figure 11
be a true picture of the surface shape of the sea, and the
observer on turning round sees a similar rise of the water on
opposite sides, then the surface of the ocean would consist
of a series of bulges, continued ad infinitum, as indicated by
figure 12!

Still Mounting Upwards

Sea Earth Globe 3
Now let there be a series of observers, as implied in figure
13; the first observer on the right sees the vessel mount
hill number one. At this point let there be another observer
watching the same ship going in the same direction he
should see it mount up hill number two. And a third
observer, similarly placed, should see the vessel still mounting
up hill number three; and so on, up towards the moon! This
would agree with the theory that the moon temporarily
attracts the waters of the ocean— but who would trust himself
to that theory to make the voyage?

We may well leave the theory of a globular sea to the
reprobation of all honest thinkers. Yet, Sir Robert Ball, in
common with some other astronomers, maintains that an
observer on the seashore, in watching a receding vessel,
actually views it mounting a hill, or a “protuberant ”
part of the ocean, until it reaches the horizon, when it begins
to descend! If the sea-earth were a globe, the observer
should always be placed on the top, near the sea-level ; and
the receding ship should at once begin to descend. But as
perspective requires objects below the eye-line to appear to
rise in the distance, the globularist is thus unconsciously
constrained to yield this testimony as a concession to truth!

Get the Sea-Earth booklet, 22 page PDF. Find out more. Click Here

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

False Perspective of the Schools

False Perspective of the Schools

Perspective: True and False

Some of the Laws of Perspective are given in the first
part of this book, so that we need not here enlarge upon
them ; but as they are very important, we briefly recapitulate
them.
(1). All parallel lines, like those of a railway, seem to
approach, and finally to meet in the distance.
(2). Straight lines above the eye of the spectator appear to
descend to the eye-line.
(3). The horizontal, or eye-line, is a straight line on a level
with the eye, at whatever elevation the spectator
may be.
(4). Lines, or objects, below the eye-line, remaining at the
same level, seem to rise as they recede, until they
vanish in the eye-line.
(5). Similarly, lines or objects above the height of the
spectator, and maintaining a constant altitude,
appear to descend until they are lost in the eye-line.
(6). Objects, or lines, do not all vanish at the same point
in the horizontal line, but the nearer they are to
that line the sooner they vanish in it, because of the
smaller angle they make with it.
(7). The distant horizon being always on a level with the
eye, whatever be the altitude of the observer, it
seems to rise, or to fall, with the observer ; but he
never has occasion to depress his vision to look
downwards towards it, nor upwards !

Now let us apply these rules, which are the Laws of true
Perspective, to the disappearance of ships at sea, as illustrated
in zetetic diagrams, and violated in those of the
globularist. First take Fig. 10 on the title page of Part II.
The intelligent reader will soon see that this ‘zetetic’ diagram
harmonises with, and illustrates, the first six rules above
given. The hull of the vessel, being nearer the eye-line,
vanishes according to rule 6, before the flags and upper sails,
which are farther from it, because the lower angle is the
lesser. Besides, the hull rides on a dark background of
water, while the upper masts and sails are often against a
bright sky! But the ship never goes over, and then down on
the further side of a bulge, or a hill of water ; for in clear
weather a good telescope, which magnifies the distant angle
of vision, brings again the ship’s hull in sight. Had the ship
gone over and beyond the supposed dip, or curvature, no
telescope could fetch it back again ; and when on the crest
of the supposed hill of water the hull itself should become
visible against the background of a clear sky ! But in harmony
with rule 4, ships never so disappear, because there is
no real rise or protuberance in a calm sea, which, as we have
abundantly shewn is everywhere level or horizontal.

FALSE PERSPECTIVE OF THE SCHOOLS.
Let us now turn to the false perspective sometimes given
in globite diagrams, and books on geography.

Sea Earth Globe 1

Our figure 11 is taken from a high-class school book ; and
in Scott’s Astronomy there is another on the same principle,
or, rather, on the same lack of principle. This diagram
violates every law of true perspective. The observer at A
is made to look down to his distant horizon, and so is the
one at B, though in the diagram he appears to look up.
This is a double violation of rule 7 as given above. And,
further, the reader will notice how the feet of the observers
are not pointing towards the centre, as they should be if
the earth be globular. The diagram is a “ scientific ” fraud.
whether intentional, or unintentional, we need not here
discuss.

Suppose the observer at A were to turn round and to look
downwards in the opposite direction towards G, what would
he see ? An awful chasm at which the stoutest heart would
quail ! The thing, and the ideas it represents, are a disgrace
to modern education ! Is it any wonder, therefore, that a
famous writer like Goethe should say, “ I curse this modern
theory of Cosmogony, and hope that perchance there may
appear some strong scientist of genius who will take up the
courage to upset this universally disseminated delirium of
lunatics.”— See The Scientific American, April 27th, 1878.

There is much more to this article. Get the whole booklet (PDF). Find out more, click here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Kepler Telescope Lies from NASA

Kepler Telescope Lies from NASA

From: http://www.fixedearth.com/

The Claims

“NASA’s Kepler planet-hunting satellite reported on Wednesday that they had identified 1,235 possible planets orbiting other stars….” (NY Times: 2/2/11) “NASA finds earth-size Planet Candidates in the Habitable Zone.” (nasa.gov/mission….) “Kepler dramatically boosts exoplanet count…about 2000 light years from earth.” (ABC Science) “Cosmic census finds crowd of planets in our galaxy.” (Yahoo!News) “…an extraordinary planet windfall, a moment that will be written in the textbooks. It will be thought of as a watershed.” (Ibid. NYT, p.2)

Comment: Hundreds of such claims are found on the Net. ALL describe such finds AS A FACT, a “watershed, textbook moment” for Space Science. It’s all lies. Read on:

The Overriding Agenda behind the Claims

“At least 500 million of those 50 billion Milky Way planets [!!] are in the…zone where life could exist.” (ibid.Yahoo!) “Of the new exoplanet candidates, Fifty-four are in the habitable zones…where temperatures should be moderate enough for liquid water.” (Ibid. NYT) SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence Institute) folks joyfully join the chorus of praise with: “A Landslide of Kepler Exoplanet Candidates” leads into 16 page coverage (http://scienceblogs.com/SETI/1011/02/SETI). “…Kepler has turned science-fiction into today’s reality”, said NASA Administrator Charles Bolden. “These discoveries underscore the importance of NASA’s science missions which consistently increase understanding of our place in the cosmos.”

Comment: NASA’s Agenda Is Unvarying. Their tax-funded billions every year remain wholly dedicated to their “Origins Program to Find Our Cosmic Roots.” That Program has established the alternate “creation model” of the Pharisee Religion.

NASA’s “Explanation” Of How the Kepler Telescope Works

“The [Kepler] telescope sees [lie] planet’s footprints as it passes across the face of its parent star, just like a gnat flying past your computer screen will block a bit of light.” “Kepler, a space telescope, looks for planet signatures [How?] by measuring tiny decreases in the brightness of stars caused by planets crossing in front of them [the stars]. They see nothing… This is known as a transit.” It’s “…like looking at a headlight at a great distance and trying to sense the brightness change when a flea crosses the surface.” “Kepler [exoplanet] 11 is located c. 2000 light years from Earth….”

Comment: 2000 light years is about 12000 Trillion Miles. Got it? Even if stars were known to be “suns”–which they emphatically are not known to be –our sun’s 870,000 mile diameter would be over 700 million times smaller than we see it. And any earth-like exoplanet ”transiting” an alleged “sun” would have to be over 100 times smaller than 700 million times. It takes 1000 x One Billion to make One Trillion. It takes 12000 Trillion miles to make the claimed 2000 light years. Is there anyone not totally hypnotized by the Pharisee Religion’s Virtual Reality Universe who can believe that earth-like planets (8000 mile diameter) have been found “transiting” a “star/sun” that is 12000 trillion miles away…and this has been done by detecting a decrease in the light emitted by an unresolveably small star/sun being “transited” by an unseen “exoplanet”??!

But that is not all we are asked to believe that Kepler can do! Additionally, we are told that Kepler can reveal from these unseen “transits” 12000 trillion miles away “gravitational interference” which enables it to “calculate their [the “exoplanets”] masses and densities” and confirm “substantial envelopes of light gases”! And all this at a distance 720 million times as far away as our sun!! Do we recognize an infinitely huge crock of offal when we see such claims, or, again, are we all hypnotized to the degree that we continue to call such “profane and vain babbling” Science??!

Facts about Telescopes Falsify “Kepler” And All Space Science Claims

“If one could look through the 200 inch (17′) telescope on Mt. Palomar, one would see stars as nothing more than the same points of light you would see by simply walking outside and looking up. Why are stars the sole hold out in the resolution revolution up to now?

Comment: No telescope has ever shown a resolution of a star (always “imaged” as round “suns”). Stars are Points of light. That’s it. The rest is computer programmed lies – from the “father of lies” (John 8:44). Think of any star point of light you can see through the 200 inch telescope as being the same size as you see by just looking up. Then imagine a speck about 108 times smaller crossing a point of light with that diameter and tell yourself that you believe the Kepler telescope can tell the speck has “transited”–not because anything is seen!–but because it registers a change in the luminosity of a tiny point of light that is 12000 trillion miles away! And, oh yeah; it calculates the unseen speck’s “mass and density and confirms “light gasses”. The gases are from NASA and they’re not light!

Anyone who is beginning to smell a very big rat in all such fact-free lies from NASA’s RELIGIOUS “Origins Program to Find Our Cosmic Roots” can find a ton of juicy fodder for your blackberry/facebook/twitter, etc. on this site (www.fixedearth.com)

In addition to the wealth of information on phony telescopes, check out the Positional Astronomy Library with its 185 big-bang based routines for your computer. Find out what a farce Infrared Astronomy is. Don’t miss the lies built on Mass-Luminosity-Magnitude-Distance and the Apparent Magnitude & Absolute Magnitude chicanery. Then there’s Radiation of Light, an-all-time -favorite, and The Drake Equation, by Drake the Flake.

The latest bull by NASA on Kepler Telescope (8 July 2021)

Click Here

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Debunk Roswell UFO Crash

Debunk Roswell UFO Crash

Source

The Historical Archives have finally been opened and studied relating to the Evolution-based UFO Saga in Roswell, New Mexico. This development threatens to jerk a bit of a knot in the agendas of ongoing media-fueled promotions, all focused on big talk about technologically advanced extraterrestrial aliens.

Roswell-1The tie-in of the UFO issue to this web page is, of course, that the whole concept of evolutionism which now infuses not only all of modern man’s “knowledge”–but also a whole range of deep-seated beliefs–is a concept that is entirely dependent on maintaining an unshakable faith in the Copernican Model of a rotating and orbiting earth.

That this Model is what upholds and makes possible the anti-Bible Origins Scenario of the anti-Christian religion–masquerading as theoretical science–is no longer in doubt. This openly anti-Christ, anti-Bible religion has established the Big Bang Evolutionary Paradigm of the Universe, Earth, and Mankind, as can be seen. This Paradigm has made possible ALL extra-terrestrial-based beliefs in “aliens”, a belief that is the accepted theme of a great percentage of all films, TV programs, books, and other media.

In other words, so-called “entertainment” is a major vehicle for indoctrinating unwary people into accepting evolutionism without the slightest idea of what is really going on. This indoctrination is pumped relentlessly into tens and hundreds of millions of minds every day and night. This ongoing UFO concept has played its role in this indoctrination for over a half century.

But now some important information has come out that could cause people to awaken to the reality of this whole indoctrination process:

The History Channel program on UFO’s (aired 11/20/04 locally) was made possible after 1998 by the opening of a dozen big boxes containing thousands of pages of files which made up the Government’s Archives relating to the alleged half century of cover-up of alleged “proof” of the existence of UFO’s around the Roswell, New Mexico Air Base.

After meticulous inspection of all these pages by a team of researchers–some of whom leaned toward a belief in a Government cover-up of actual UFO landings and sightings of “aliens”, etc.–the conclusion was unanimous: No such evidence exists.

That there have been actual military experiments that were lied about and kept secret, the documents confirmed. That those secrets in any way involved aliens from outer space, the documents denied.

The testing of the effect of parachuting from special weather balloons at 100,000 ft. altitude was found in the records but not reported. This explained some “UFO sightings”.

The secret use of chimps dressed in “space suits”…whose bodies were taken from their crashed capsules in the desert and unintentionally witnessed by some civilians, added fuel to the alien mythology. So also did badly burned bodies taken from an on-base plane crash and worked on by a lying doctor and a nurse he invented to enhance his phony claim that these were bodies of “aliens”.

A real experimental “flying saucer” with a 40 ft. diameter had been secretly tested by the military at that base…which further helped to explain a lot about the reported UFO sightings.

Thus, the long and short of all the UFO hype from that base (for almost 60 years now) is that the recently opened and studied Archives of this Mother of all UFO mythology–i.e., the alleged military cover-up of UFO’s and Aliens seen at the Roswell, NM base–proved two things conclusively: One: The military conducted top secret experiments at that base which it denied and lied about. Two: There was absolutely no evidence of any UFO’s or Aliens that had been covered up. Furthermore, the real experiments that were conducted on various projects were of such a nature so as to create visual apparitions that would account for the claims made by people who testified that they had seen UFO’s and even “aliens”.

Interestingly, the researchers concluded also that there were deeply-committed believers in UFO’s whose minds would not be persuaded by the Archival evidence about the Roswell claims… any more than the evidence from dozens of other investigations that had arrived at the same conclusion, namely, the conclusion that it is all a media-fueled hoax spun off of otherwise explainable phenomena. Their report also pointed out that the once sleepy town of Roswell itself has grown to a city of 50,000 and now accommodates tens of thousands of tourists who go there to partake of the UFO reputation the site has.

What folks now need to recognize in light of these researcher’s conclusions is that, historically, there has been an increasingly sophisticated evolutionary propaganda effort that began in earnest over 4-1/2 centuries ago with the aptly named “Copernican Revolution”. This unceasing and ever- escalating implantation of an evolutionary mind-set in people everywhere has successfully blanketed academia and literature and all other media since that time.

Since the early 1980’s particularly, this indoctrination effort has gone to all-out “blitz mode”. Now, unlimited opportunities for fraudulent use of computerized Space Telescopes and Cameras and Redshift and Infrared technologies, etc., to “certify” the requirements of extraterrestrial evolutionism are routinely exploited to the hilt.

Add to this unrestrained abuse of otherwise marvelous technology the admitted evolutionary agenda of the NASA-led Space Program and you will begin to understand just how deep and far-reaching this deception has become.

Once that sinks in, another leap of understanding is available to those who want to see for themselves the no-longer-secret identity of the RELIGION that is the driving force behind all of this fantastic deception which claims that evolution is a “scientific” concept.

“Virtual Reality” instead of “Real Reality” is the entire focus of The Theoretical Science Establishment today. Take a few minutes to savor the rhapsodic descriptions on this one page link about the Virtual Reality universe that computer cyberpunks have created out of absolutely nothing real; i.e., no facts whatsoever.

These things–when taken together with the recent opening of the archival evidence pooh-poohing all the Roswell-generated UFO mythology–should provide a welcome big chunk of Truth for those who are interested in being free of all evolution-driven extraterrestrial deception that now undergirds every bit of modern man’s academia-approved “knowledge”.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Purpose of God’s Law

Purpose of God’s Law

To remind our new readers, this website is not only about the flat earth but also a Christian ministry. As flat earthers know that the Bible tells of the truth about the nature of earth but it’s also very important to know what other biblical truths are covered up. These articles (link to PDF) will explore other areas. And, there’ll be more articles to come that will do the same. It’s is the false teachers who cover up the truth, part of which is, that they want to be politically correct and not offend anyone.

In this issue:

  • Lawless Pastors by Dr Everett Ramsey
  • Did the coming of Christ abolish the Law?
  • Not justified by the Law
  • No Law there is no sin
  • Purpose of the Law is to expose sin
  • Purpose of the Law is to bring us to Christ
  • Who Rules
  • The significance of our Israelite Identity

Click Here

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment