What Is Reality? What Is Truth?

What is Reality? What is Truth?

virtual realityThe government and space agencies try to fool by changing what is reality and, therefore, change what is the truth. As flat earth believers, we know all about this. It is most evident in the phony pictures that suppose to show space and other planets.

Is reality nothing more than a matter of perspective – different for one than it is for another? No. Reality is a matter of perception. The accuracy of your religious/political position depends upon your personal perception of truth. The way you perceive truth determines whether you are seeing fantasies or facts. But, how can you tell? How can you be objective about your own perceptions?

The search for reality is more than just finding truth. It, in fact, is a search for how to perceive. There are many false prophets out there waiting to hand you illusions. But reality just not only be seen – it must also be perceived. We all see reality, because reality is all around us. However, very few of us actually perceive what we see.

Perception is an art that most people never learn. In fact, most people are taught NOT to attempt to perceive – because they are not qualified (authorized). They, instead are told to accept the official answers already perceived by licensed and authorized perceivers (the prophets, priest, and it today’s world, teachers, scientists [so-called] and government officials). We are told “don’t question or analyse.” Rather, they are to memorize the authorized answers. They are spoon fed the official view of things and told to accept it because it has been authorized and officially deemed “true and factual.” It has the official stamp of approval on it. If people spend years accepting and believing the “official” views, then any theory that deviates from their official view falls into the category of “wacko.”

This patented process robs us of our ability to perceive, and removes our ability to analyse. We can’t discern truth because we can’t ask the right question. The right questions are unthinkable; un-askable. To even ask puts you under suspicion.

But understanding and believing in conspiracy theories (or even questioning official doctrine) is not “wacko” behavior. The rest of this article will show you one way you can develop the art of perception in your pursuit of truth. This article will be from an artist’s perspective.

Drawing And The Art Of Perception

drawing

One way to explain the process of perceiving truth is to compare it with the process of drawing a picture. The art of drawing pictures is more clear-cut than the art of perceiving truths nonetheless there are some parallels that can help us understand.

Now, admittedly this section is rather long but please bear with me as this will help explain how our perceptions are changed.

In 1979, Betty Edwards published “Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain.” In this book she documented cases where students who didn’t think they could be taught to draw were remarkably transformed by the end of six weeks, and were turning out drawings comparable to “highly talented” artists! This was done, not by teaching them how to draw, but by training them how to perceive.

The basis of Betty Edwards’ research on the subject was a study of the two hemispheres of the brain. Her research suggest that the Left hemisphere of the brain:

  • 1 Uses words to name, describe and define (Verbal).
  • 2 Figures out things step by step an part by part (Analytic).
  • 3 Uses symbols to stand for things (Symbolic).
  • 4 Chooses a little information to represent the whole thing (Abstract).
  • 5 Keeps track of time and does things in sequence and by priorities (Temporal).
  • 6 Draws conclusions based on reason and facts (Rational and Logical).
  • 7 Favors the use of numbers (Digital).
  • 8 Thinks in a straight line where one idea is linked to another (Linear).

Compare how the Right hemisphere of the brain is different from the Left: The Right hemisphere of the brain:

  • 1 Uses non-verbal cognition to perceive.
  • 2 Puts pieces together to form wholes.
  • 3 Relates to things as they are, at the present moment.
  • 4 Sees likenesses among things; understands metaphoric relationships.
  • 5 Has no sense of time.
  • 6 Doesn’t require a basis of reason or facts; wiling to suspend judgment. Makes leaps of insight, often based on incomplete patterns, hunches, feelings, or visual images (Intuitive, Non-rational).
  • 7 Sees where things are in relation to other things and how parts go together to form a whole (Spatial).
  • 8 Sees the complete picture all at once; perceiving overall patterns and structures.

Obviously, the Right Hemisphere of the brain gives you what you need to be an artist. The Left Hemisphere gives you what you need to critically analyse things. The problem with people who have difficulty drawing is that their Left Hemisphere dominates their thinking and blocks access to the Right Hemisphere. Hence, there are many people who say “I can’t even draw a straight line.” These people assume that their powers of observation are working fine but they just have no talent to draw. However, it turns out that their powers of observation are not working fine, and the blame does not lie with their drawing ability.

Artists, inventors and creative thinkers in any profession often have the ability to use both sides of their brains as they shift from the Left Hemisphere to the Right Hemisphere, thereby perceiving things both ways. As a result, they tap into the creative process, creating artistic masterpieces and inventing new ways of doing things. When they come up with a list of new ideas they then shift back to their analytical Left Hemisphere and decide the validly of the new ideas. These learners use more of their brains than people who are merely “schooled.”

In Betty Edwards’ book, she tracked the drawing history of most children. We all start out wanting to draw. As we develop our drawing skills we make a basic discovery of art: a drawn symbol on a piece of paper can stand for something around us. For instance, a child draws a circle, adds two dots for eyes and a curve for the mouth and calls this symbol “Mommy” or “Daddy.” As we grow older and continue to drawing, we adopt and solidify more and more symbols for the things in our environment. These are actually “symbols” because they beat little or no resemblance to the real things. When we draw symbols for cats, dogs, birds, houses, cars, etc., we are using our Left hemisphere to perceive things.

At age four or five we relate to stories by the way we draw people and things. At age five or six we have worked out a set of symbols we use to create a landscape. At around 10, we try to capture more detail in our drawings in order to achieve more realism. By age 11 we have a passion for getting the right details into our drawings. Boys often draw meticulous renderings of race cars or airplanes and girls draw complex dress designs or careful drawings of horses or other animals.

This is the stage that many of us become discouraged with art because, even though we have added many details to our drawings, they still aren’t looking realistic. Many of us never find the answer as to why we can’t achieve realism in our drawings, and we assume that we have failed in the actual drawing rather than in our perceptions of things.

The truth is, we are not seeing things accurately, and that is why we can’t produce an accurate drawing. But what is it that prevents us from perceiving things accurately?

Part of the answer is that, as children we learned to see things in terms of words and symbols (Left Hemisphere perception). The dominant symbol hemisphere doesn’t like too much information about things it perceives; just enough to recognize and categorise. The left brain learns to cover quickly because it has to process such an enormous volume of incoming information that it must screen out most of it. This works most of the time because it helps us to focus our thinking.

But the ability to draw pictures requires that you look at something for a long time, perceived many details, and register non-verbal, non-symbolic information.

The impatient Left Hemisphere says, “It’s a table (or a chair, bird, car, etc.) and that’s all you need to know. In fact don’t waste your time looking at it because I have ready-made symbol for you to use.”

The problem is that our own personal system of symbols has been embedded in our memories, so we keep drawing the symbols we have learned rather than drawing what we are actually seeing in real life.

By the time we become teenagers most of us become frustrated with drawing. We would like to draw details, but our Left-brain-thinking has worked so hard for so long solidifying a large library of ready-made symbols of people, places, and things that it keeps getting in the way of our Right hemisphere non-symbol perception.

When adult art students “don’t know how to draw” they do not really perceive what is in front of their eyes. They simply take a quick Left-brained note of what’s there, then they translate that into words and symbols based on their stored archives of words and symbols developed during their life. The resulting drawing doesn’t look realistic because it is a graphic symbol rather than an accurate rendering of the object.

The Elite who controls the world know about this; they know that the average person doesn’t like details, so a simplistic message is given as to what happened – such as the “lone gunman” in a school shooting. When, in actuality it was a grand conspiracy by the Elite who have other hired gunman positioned through the school to make sure enough people are killed; the CCTV cameras were conveniently not working; a mind control student was used for him to the “fall guy;” crises actors are used to make like there was only one gunman; staged demonstrations are set to protest ownership of guns; laws are already drawn up to put into place; and the list goes on and. All of this, is TOO MUCH INFORMATION for the brain to handle, so a symbol is made – so to speak – that it was a lone gunman who did the killing, his name is Mike Pollaski, for example, and that he is a Right-wing Christian fanatic – all of whom should be locked up if not killed. Then, we’ll have no crime. So, make sure you are not a Christian seeking the truth.

Back to the art student…

When these frustrated would be artists enter Betty Edwards’ drawing classes they are given certain drawing exercises to perform. These exercises are designed to “turn off” the Left-brain symbol system so the Right-brain system can emerge and actually draw a picture.

One such exercise requires the student to take a complicated line drawing or detailed photo, turn it upside down, and then proceed to draw it using a pencil on a blank sheet of paper. At first, Left-brain-oriented people think it is crazy to turn a picture upside down to draw it! It’s amazing to see the reactions of people when they are told to do this exercise. They are simply flabbergasted. (Just like people are flabbergasted when they are told that the earth is flat, lol.) The exercise forces them to depart from the normal, traditional structure of thinking. “It can’t be done!” they protest. “Why in heaven’s name would you do such a thing?!”

What happens is that a difficult mental adjustment occurs in a person’s mind when he is forced to turn something upside down and draw it. And this adjustment doesn’t happen smoothly or quickly. When we perceive things, we automatically become accustomed to the top, bottom and sides of those things and we expect to see those things right-side up. When things are right-side up, we can recognize them, name them, and categorize them according to our large Left-brained archive of stored symbols. But when an image is turned upside-down, the visual clues become scrambled and don’t fit our preconceived symbols. The Left-hemisphere becomes confused and can’t associate the things in a picture with any of the symbols in its archives, arid it tends to shut down. Hence, people exclaim in frustration “this is crazy!”

But this is where, if the student has patience to continue drawing, the Right-hemisphere of the brain, which isn’t obsessed with associating pictures with words or symbols, takes over and simply perceives the anonymous lines, curves, shapes and tones that make up the picture. After having drawn a picture upside-down, Left-brain-oriented people will turn their drawing right-side up and gasp in astonishment at how much better their upside-down drawing looks than if they had tried to draw the picture right-side up!

The results are indeed astonishing. With the Left-brain symbols turned off, the students can perceive the reality that is actually in front of them, and they are able to produce a realistic drawing on paper – something they hitherto thought impossible! And with practice they get even better! After they have successfully made this mental adjustment and are comfortable with it, they no longer have to turn pictures upside down in order to shift their thinking. In effect, they now know how to automatically think “upside down” when they want to draw real-life objects around them!

When we are told stories of current events or past historical war events, it doesn’t make sense but we accept them and have learned not to question the narrative, for, if we do, we are called, nazi, Christian fanatic, etc. But if look at the “official story” in another light, from another angle, then things make sense; and we know what really happened. A simple case in point:

The so-called Christian Allies, walk arm-in-arm with the antichrists (the Soviet Union); when we go to war with another Christian nation but support the Christ hating Communists; when the U.S. and the U.K. say they stand for freedom, yet turn half of Europe over to the antichrists. This doesn’t make sense but we accept the narrative. Then, one day we “take our picture, turn it upside down and draw a better picture,” and WWII makes sense. Then we know who caused the war, why they caused it and the excuses used to fight our Christian brothers.

Now, back to our art student story…

What happens in these drawing classes is that:

A The teacher points out that there is a problem with their perception and that it (and hence, their drawing ability) could be enhanced if they will “turn off” the method of perceiving to which they are accustomed.

B The people reluctantly recognize they have a problem with their perception.

C This shifting of paradigms is encouraged by the teacher.

D The student dare to abandon their traditional modes of thinking and, after a bit of mental struggle, experience a shift from one mode of perception to another (from Left-brain perception to Right-brain perception).

E Detail is more accurately perceived and thus more accurately transmitted to the drawing paper.

Now, take this process for learning to draw and compare it with the process for learning logic (i.e., aptitude for analysing and discerning truth in history, politics, religion, current events, etc.).

As children, the moment we enter government school (misnomer: public school), we are started on a library of mental symbols to memorize. One by one, as the subjects come up, as the years go by, e learn a symbol for each subject.

9-11 (Symbol: Arabs brought the Twin Towers down with commercial planes.)

Pearl Harbour (Symbol: Japanese made a surprise attack. America did nothing to provoke it, thus they had the right to declare war on Japan and Germany.)

Guns (Symbol: Guns kill people; outlaw guns and the killing will stop.)

Earth (Symbol: The Earth is a globe and one of trillions of other planets out there.)

Planets (Symbol: Big Bang. Everything started with the Big Bang, and Evolution. Therefore, there is no need for God.)

The list of learned mental symbols impressed into our minds – in the form of the spoken and written word, pictures and videos – goes on and on. These symbols come with the associated script that you don’t even have to think. The symbol is shown and the story is automatically attached and you dare not question it. As there are obstacles that can block students who want to learn to draw, there are also obstacles that can block you from learning to perceive the truth.

A Instead of teaching you to critically analyse ideas, pastors and bureaucrats merely reaffirm the symbols memorized from childhood that is repeated 1,000 times.

B You remain stuck in the paradigms designed and authorized by the establishment. Anyone who thinks outside the box is called a “wacko” or “fanatic” by the bureaucrats and a “heretic” by the churchgoers.

C People don’t divert from the facial symbols (authorized paradigms) and therefore they see only what they are told to see.

D The conspiracy of the prophets and priests, described in Ezekiel, still works for enslaving the masses.

Learn to Think Upside-Down

The analogy of drawing a picture upside-down to achieve more accuracy applies to thoughts as well. If you tell people that they may benefit from turning their perceptions of religious and governmental issues upside-down, they may think, “This is crazy!” as did the students in the drawing class.

Can it help turn our thinking upside-down? Sometimes it can. People may assume they already know how God thinks, but unless they turn their thinking upside-down once in a while thye may be missing the point – because God’s thinking is often the opposite of man’s thinking. Consider this verse:

For my thoughts are not your thoughts neither are your ways my ways says Yahweh. Is. 55:8

Look at the following examples of the opposite or “upside-down” way God thinks compared to the way men think. These are God-given clues to show peole how to escape from established paradigms that don’t work.

The Straight and Narrow

Men tend to evaluate issues based upon the number of people who agree with it rather than by logic and sensibility. The greater the number of people who agree, the more correct it is deemed.

But here’s the upside-down way God thinks:

Enter you in at the narrow gate: for wide is the gate, and spacious is they way leading to destruction, and many are they who through it:

Because narrow is the gate, and tight is the way, leading to life, and few are they that find it. Matt. 7:13-14

The Weak Confounds The Strong

Most people would think that the stronger opponent always overcomes the weaker opponent; the more intellectual always wins over the not-so-intellectual, etc. But here’s the upside-down way God thinks:

27 But God chose the foolish things of the world to put to shame the wise; and God chose the weak things of the world to put to shame the strong.

28 And God has chosen the things not produced of the world, and things considered as nothing; and things which are not, to bring to nothing the things that are.

29 That no flesh should boast in his sight.

1 Cot. 1:27-29

I could go on and on, but I’m sure you see that the point is that God’s ways are different than man’s ways. Just about every doctrine issue that is taught in the churches are wrong. They are wrong because they are not “politically correct.”

The Media Tells Just the Opposite

In order to get yourself out of this false reality, this matrix that we are kept in, there is one way to see through it or at least to start questioning what you are told. Look at what is the opposite. Take the school shooting at Sandy Hook, look at what we are not told, what we are not shown. Look at what others have said; does it make sense.

Lies are one way of keeping us under control but, of course, an explanation is given for why things are so. If you look at the medical profession, we are told that you need to see a doctor, you need to take some man-made medication, that you need surgery. Finally, you are told that there is no cure for ________ (fill in the blank). Then consider that this is man’s ways; think of what God has provided. Look at what you can do for yourself naturally, look at the herbs and food that God provides for us as our medication. Think of going to Him in prayer and fasting for healing.

Symbol: The medical symbol of the snake, means we should go to the pharmacist or to see a doctor. Then think of the other Symbol, The Cross.

Opposite Shape of the Earth

Is not the earth the opposite shape of what we are told? I believe this is done for a reason – to make us think that we are one of billions out there; that God is far removed; that we have to go it alone. And later, The Big Bang and Evolution came along and fits right in with a Universe that has no God.

The Reason Why Jesus Spoke in Parables

Most people think that Jesus intended for everyone to hear His Kingdom parables; that His message is for everyone. They assume that his purpose was to convert the enemies and the antichrists (more than one), and make them understand. To typical man, that sounds like the right way to proceed. But here’s the “upside-down” way Jesus thinks:

11 And he said to them, To you the mystery has been given of the kingdom of God: but to them that are outside, all these things are done in parables:

12 In order that looking, they might look but not see; and hearing they may hear and not comprehend; at no time will they repent and be forgiven.

Mark 4: 11-12

The parables were spoken by Jesus for the purpose of letting his disciples learn while confusing the enemy. They were cryptographic, like coded messages – designed to be understood by those who had “ears to hear” but not understand by the devils who might be listening.

We Don’t Choose Jesus; He Chooses Us

How many times have you heard pastor admonishing people choose Jesus; to make a decision to follow Jesus? But the fact is that we cannot, on our own, choose Jesus. Rather, Jesus chooses us and we merely respond. Here is the “upside-down” way he thinks:

16 You did not choose me, but I chose you, and ordained you, and I appointed you to go and bear fruit,…

John 15:16

Turn Your World Upside-down

Making the mental adjustment of turning your thinking upside-down shouldn’t be viewed as such an odd or risky thing to do. It will not make you a “wacko!” True, it is not easy; you have to develop a habit of looking at things that the media tells you in a different light. When you do, it’ll be easier to overturn the larger man-made symbols filed away in your mind.

The next time you hear about an event that happened – current or historical – notice how you’ve been trained to react. Notice the labels they use to anyone one who does not believe their story line. Notice how people react when they are told they are: nutters, racists, conspiracy theorists. They want us to recoil and deny what we have been labelled. When we do, then we are “good little boys and girls.” Well, don’t let those names affect you; maybe you should be proud to be called this and continue to look at what the opposite is. When you do, you will get closer to the truth.

The media trains you to pooh pooh any conspiracy theory without even giving it any thought. When you do, you are reacting to exactly the way the government/educational system/media wants you to react. Stop right there and turn your thinking upside-down. Entertain the concept that this conspiracy you just discovered could be true, and start investigating and researching it. You may discover you have been the victim of a conspire to deprive you of the truth.

Not only can you learn more by avoiding the Establishment schools, but you can also learn better by avoiding the Establishment churches! If you find you are one of those who can successfully deal with the upside-down thinking then you may suddenly find yo have a thrist for reality; for what’s REALLY out there – THE TRUTH.

7 Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom: and with all your getting get understanding.
Prov. 4:7

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Which Is Science, Which Is Fraud?

Which Is Science, Which Is Fraud?

Click to access which-is-science-which-is-fraud.pdf

.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment

Sin, Sorcery and Propaganda

Sin, Sorcery and Propaganda

Weekly Sermon, 19 December 2021

by Pastor Pete Peters

Learn about how a spell is being cast on America and how it’s being done. Your learn about dialectic and how it’s controlling you. Though this sermon was made many years ago, it applies more so today.

Click on the picture.

Sin Sorcery Propaganda 2

.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

FAQ About The Flat Earth

FAQ About The Flat Earth

As believers in the flat Earth it’s good to know the frequently asked questions about the flat Earth. Below is an 8 page PDF to help you answer critics. Print it out and use it as a reference. I’m sure you can add more to it. Let’s be able to answer any question both “in and out of season,” and be a good witness to the truth.

Click to access faq-flat-earth.pdf

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

On The Stars

On The Stars

gif-stars1

(From an old flat earth booklet.)

THERE are definitely no solid bodies between the
earth and the dome of the sky. The stars are not
masses of matter, and they do not result either from
projections like the satellite discs of the earth.

Xenophanes in the 6th century B.C. thought that the
humid exhalations of the earth contained latent sparks
which, after some sort of condensation, formed the stars, and this explanation appears to be acceptable.

The astronomers of ancient Egypt believed also that
the stars were suspended from the dome of the sky
by cables, like lamps, and the fact is that on very clear
nights, filaments or lines connecting the stars of each
constellation can be clearly distinguished; from this
we may conclude that there exists above the earth a
network of ethereal cords, certain parts of which,
particularly at the intersections, condense and retain
permanently the radio-active emanations from the
earth, thus constituting the stars, in accordance with
the theory of Xenophanes. This does not exclude the
possibility of any effects resulting from the influence
of the dome of the sky or from the presence of the
sun during the day.* It is also evident, since all the
constellations are seen to move in bulk, that it is the
frame or structure, acting as their support, which
revolves and carries them along. It could, further,
be surmised that this stellar network above the earth
is, at intervals, subjected to phases of tension and
relaxation, which would have the effect of enlarging
or reducing the size of interstellar spaces; and also
that the volume of the earth’s radio-active emanations
varies according to seasons or other causes, therefore
increasing or diminishing the luminosity and the
number of the stars.

The stars are, thus, nearer the earth than the
satellite discs which move on the vault of the sky,
and this fact is in accordance with the theory of both
Anaximander and Parmenides. Concerning the supposed
occultations of the stars by the moon, it can be
said that it is not necessary that the latter should pass
in front of a star to render it momentarily invisible,
since the same result is achieved if the moon, the
brighter light of which causes the disappearance of
the star, passes at the back of it.

When we speak of a stellar network or system, it
is self evident that there are two such networks, one
over each half of the earth, which possess different
signs and constellations and meet over the equator.
It can be observed that the constellations make a
complete circle of that part of the heavens in which
they are situated, in one year, which is equivalent to
an approximate speed of one degree per day, and it

* Shooting stars are not to be confused with stars in the ordinary
sense. They are luminous manifestations which took place on the surface
of the dome of the sky as previously explained.

is this advancing motion of the constellations of one
degree per day which, for some incomprehensible
reason, has been attributed to the sun. In our regions
north of the equator this movement takes place from
west to east, in a direction opposite to that of the
satellite discs of the earth. As to the possible origin
of the motion of the stars, this could be determined
by a magnet action exercised by the metallic dome
of the sky, or perhaps by the passage of the daily
and semi-annual cosmic breath streams.

It has been said that there exists a regular retrogression
of the constellations of fifty seconds of
degree per year, and that this movement was first
noticed by Hipparchus in the 2nd century B.C. when
comparing his notes with those which another observer,
Timochris by name, had made one and a half
centuries beforehand. It would be necessary, in the
first place, to know whether the calculations these
two investigators made at an interval of one hundred
and fifty years are correct, and whether they must be
accepted, which is by no means certain; but why,
anyhow, has this retrogradation which was visible
and measurable in the time of Hipparchus, been
mysteriously transformed through the ages into an
invisible retrogradation? A difference of fifty seconds
per year is appreciable over a length of time, as it
amounts to one degree in seventy-two years, and it
should by now since the 2nd century B.C. equal
about thirty degrees. It is, however, impossible
nowadays to see this considerable difference in longitude
in the position of the constellations. These
always return to the exact spot they occupied in the
heavens the preceding years at a given instant. That
is to say that this retrogradation which Hipparchus
thought he had discovered, does not exist, and if it
does exist why, considering the importance which is
attached to it, does it not figure in any of the official
astronomical publications?

There is, therefore, no retrograde motion of the
zodiacal signs over each other. Aries, actually
presumably occupied by Taurus, is not in Pisces,
Pisces in Aquarius, etc. They are still, in the same
order, at the place they occupied in the beginning of
time. Further, the theory of the precession of the
equinoctial point which was derived from this supposed
retrogradation of the constellations, as extended
to the sun, cannot be substantiated.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The Immaterial Nature of the Satellites of the Earth, part 2 (of 2)

The Immaterial Nature of the Satellites of the Earth, part 2 (of 2)

FE Corona RevelationIt would, thus, appear that the satellite discs are not
reflections of the Earth like the Babylonians believed
in the case of the Moon, since the earth is not round.
They are either direct projections emanating from
luminous centres, or reflections on the vault of the
sky, of primary luminous projections. It has been, in
fact, said by the ancients, speaking of the Sun, that
it is only a reflection of a much greater and more
powerful sun existing in an exterior Universe.

If either of these two alternatives is correct, the great
difficulty, however, which still remains to be solved
in a satisfactory manner, is the motion itself of the
satellites. Now, in the course of research on light,
the author has come across certain experiments carried
out in the last century by the French physicist
Lissajou* whereby a spot of light reflected on a
screen is made to move, simply by imparting a vibration
to the surface from which this spot of light is
reflected; and the experiments in question seem to
supply the mechanism of the motion, including even
retrogradation, of reflected luminous projections on
the vault of heaven corresponding to the discs.
In these demonstrations, rays of light are allowed
to fall on a mirror fixed to one branch of a tuning
fork.

The spot of light thus obtained is reflected from
the mirror on to a second one similarly attached to
another tuning fork, and from there again reflected
on a screen. The screen, in this comparison, corresponds
to the vault of the sky, and the spot of light to
the various satellite discs of the earth. By letting
either fork vibrate alone, the motion of its attached
mirror will cause the spot to travel to and fro in a
straight line on the screen; but on account of the
persistence of vision we then see an unbroken line of
light. We now come to the important part of the
demonstration. If the two forks, with mirrors

* Jules, Antoine Lissajou, born in Versailles in 1822. Died 1880.
Carried out important research work on sound and optic. His reputation
was established by his Etude Optique des Mouvements
Vibratoires, 1873.

attached, vibrate together, the spot of light then
describes a curve, the form of which varies according
to the rate of vibration. The continuous luminous
curve is also created by a fast to and fro motion of
the spot of light, like the straight line obtained
previously by the vibration of one of the reflecting
mirrors only. Under these conditions the satellite
discs of the Earth may result from similar circumstances,
i.e., two successive reflections (the last one
on to the vault of the sky) of a primary luminous
projection, the motion being automatically created,
as well as the curved line of the orbit, by the vibratory
modes of the surfaces from which they are
reflected, as per the demonstration. If we suppose
the existence of slow vibrations, the retrogradation,
which corresponds to the to and fro motion of the
spot of light as reflected on the screen, would be
obtained; but in the case of the sun and the moon,
which do not retrograde, the vibrations of the reflecting
surfaces would be fast in order to conform to that
part of the experiment, where due to the persistence of
vision created by the rapidity of the vibrations, a continuous
curve is produced. It would, thus, appear
that since the results obtained by Lissajou reproduce
the characteristics displayed by the satellite discs of
the earth as regards their origin and their motion,
this explanation could be accepted. If experiments
were carried out thereby ascertaining the suitable
vibratory motions to be applied to the reflecting surfaces,
it is probable that a complete reconstitution of
the cosmic device could be affected.

Before becoming aware of the Lissajou tests,
which now seem conclusive,
the author was of opinion that the motion of
the disc satellites of the earth was due to a natural,
although unexplainable, moving projection device,
since the fast or slow, either direct or retrograde
movements, as well as the period of immobility of the
satellites, can all be reproduced by the mechanism of
cinematography.

As to the origin of the vibratory agents, the
author’s theory is that they result from the passage
of the semi-annual and daily cosmic breath streams,
of which they follow the increasing and decreasing
phases. It is stated in the Hindu texts, to which
reference has already been made, that the chariot (of
the Sun) becomes restless upon the arrival of dawn,
signifying here the breath of day, which sets it in
motion; and this might indicate that the simultaneous
vibrating of the two reflecting surfaces which determine
the ascending and descending movement of
the Sun, is produced and governed by the breath of
day. In that case, there would be a new sun every
morning, and this could perhaps explain the reason
of its obvious weakness upon rising and setting; in
the latter circumstance the usual flickering which
precedes the extinction of a light can readily be
observed.

The passage of the semi-annual increasing
and decreasing summer and winter breath streams
would also create in the reflecting surfaces correspondingly
increasing and decreasing vibrations,
affecting, thus, the yearly height of the sun. These
hypotheses may only constitute an imperfect solution
of the problem, but they may lead in the future, by
means of suitable research and experiments, to a
more concrete explanation.

The origin and situation of the luminous projector
centres would still have to be elucidated. Their size
may be very small, but the projections would be
greatly enlarged by the successive reflections, particularly
the last one on the vault of the sky. These
primary sources of light may be situated, as the
ancients thought in the case of the sun, in an exterior
Universe communicating with the interior of the
cavity which contains the earth by means of openings,
as early cosmogonies include many references to the
existence of doors and windows in the vault of the
sky. It is improbable that the exploration of sidereal
space, as far as it can be carried, will ever permit to
clear up the difficulty, or furnish information as to
the situation of the vibrating surfaces from which the
discs are reflected on the vault of the sky.

It can also now be understood that, since they are
reflections, the satellite discs of the earth cannot, of
their own, produce any sort of phenomenon; and if
spots or shadows appear in their circumference it is
clear that these modifications occur in the first place
either in the primary projector centre or on the reflecting
surfaces, or, perhaps, on the vault of the sky;
and that these modifications are reproduced eventually
in the interior of the discs. Circular currents
moving at unequal speeds at various latitudes have
been observed in the sun; and as these appear to
represent a rotary motion, it has been assumed that
the latter rotates on its axis at a speed of twenty-four
days in the region of its equator, and of twenty-five
days in the case of its other latitudes; but it can be
understood that these currents, or vortices, exist either
in the primary projector centre, or in the reflecting
surfaces, and that they are represented in the interior
of the solar disc, although these manifestations might
also be due to the disc’s motion on the reflecting convex
walls of the sky.

Some secondary satellites, or moons, are also said
to have been discovered round the satellite discs of the
earth, but they can be assumed to be optical illusions;
and that if they are not caused by a distortion of
vision in the objective, they may result from a multiple
refraction of the primary disc on the adjacent
walls of the dome.

It is necessary to recall what has previously been
said concerning the short distance of the vault; consequently
the luminous discs, called planets, which
move on the latter, are also less than one hundred
kilometers from the earth.

immaterial nature of the Moon, old flat earth booklet,

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Elites Have Been Planning This for 100 Years

Plans For The Great Re-set

Global Re-set 12-2021

You can download this, video, too. Just look at the three little dots
on the bottom right of the screen.

Click Here to view

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Immaterial Nature of the Satellites of the Earth, part 1 (of 2)

The Immaterial Nature of the Satellites of the Earth, part 1 (of 2)

Moon 6-2021

(From an old flat earth booklet.)

THE satellites of the Earth are not masses of matter.
They are luminous and transparent discs without
substance. The Moon, in particular, conveys the impression
of being an ethereal manifestation, and the
uncertain and illusive character which is usually
associated with this satellite results precisely from its
immaterial nature.

As already stated, the surface irregularities which
were thought to exist on the imaginary masses called
planets, are those of the dome of the sky, such as
they are seen through the transparent discs. The so-called
mountains, craters and depressions of the
moon are details of the structure of the dome. It may
be remarked in this connection that the astronomers
at the Mount Palomar Observatory in America have
recently reported that striking alterations have taken
place on the surface of the moon. Gigantic craters
and fissures of more than five hundred kilometers are
said to have appeared; and ranges of mountains as
important as the Alps have disappeared without
leaving a trace; but all those supposed alterations
correspond clearly to the successive structural features
of the dome which are progressively revealed by the
luminous and transparent disc of the moon as it
moves on.

This explanation applies also in the case of Mars.
The canals are most likely cracks, or may be dark
veins existing in the surface of the vault which are
seen through the disc. It has been observed that from
time to time the canals multiply and change their
form and their width, and that the dark regions,
called cases, which are also to be seen, expand or
shrink; but, as already said above, these changes
relate in fact to the gradual exposure of the vault
structure under the advancing disc. The same
remarks apply also to Jupiter which is said to have
undergone similar transformations. The notion that
the satellites of the earth are masses of matter, which
originated with Aristotle in the 3rd century B.C.,
has to be abandoned. There are no solid bodies
travelling in space, and the use in the vocabulary of
the word planet which has this erroneous meaning is
no longer justified.

It could further be said, concerning the true composition
of the satellites of the earth, that it might
have been discovered before to-day that the latter
are not masses of matter, in view of the fact that they
are able to remain at a standstill for several days
during the pause which follows their retrogradation,
irrespective of whether they are held to revolve round
the earth or the sun. It is obvious that during this
time, the supposed compensating forces which are
said to result from the movements of the planets.

and thereby hold them in space, would cease to
operate, due to the absence of motion. The only
physical law to which the planets would then be subjected
would be that of gravity and, under the circumstances,
they would normally be precipitated on
earth, or on the sun as the case might be. The fact
that the satellites are able to remain suspended in
space for days during the stationary period which
follows retrogradation indicates that they are not
masses of matter, and that they can only be luminous
manifestations, which fact is compatible with the
impressive silence ruling in the heavens.

It was recognised from the earliest times that the
satellites of the earth, particularly the sun and the
Moon was not solid, opaque bodies. They were
first, until Aristotle, considered to be souls or spirits,
which does not imply a physical nature. To the
ancients, they were simply lights, and they gave the
Sun and the Moon is a very apt name. They called them
luminaries. Xenophanes, in the 6th century B.C.
thought that the sun was an accumulation of sparks
resulting from the influence of Earth. Several
other physicists believed that it was a vitreous body,
or a lens reflecting the light of the ether, and this
theory which is based on observation is logical, considering
that the metallic nature of the surface of the
dome of the sky was probably unknown at that time.

As for the Moon, it is said that ages ago, long before
the beginning of the Christian era, the Babylonian
astronomer-priests were teaching in their temples that
it was a reflection of Earth. This supposition of
reflection is exact, but that of the origin of the reflection
is not, for the lunar disc, which is as perfectly
circular as possible, cannot be a reflection of the
earth since the latter is not round. Copernicus was the
first to assign this shape to the earth in order to support
the rotation. It should, moreover, be borne in
mind that the circular shape which Earth appears
to affect is merely due to the convexity of the dome
of the sky which bounds the horizon. The ancients
have always said that the earth is flat and this is confirmed
by the photographic records of a large number
of airmen, and also by the declaration of Prof.
Piccard when he ascended in the stratosphere. It is,
further, difficult to believe as it has been explained,
that the inhabitants of the Antipodes, as a natural
consequence of the rotundity of the earth, are able to
stand and walk, feet on earth and head down in the
manner of insects crawling on a ceiling. We may
reasonably think that the inhabitants of the whole
world walk in the same manner as we do, and on the
same plane, which is the horizontal surface of the
e arth; and it is undoubtedly that which would be
seen if Australia could be reached by television.
Since concrete notions have now been obtained concerning
the existence of a circular vault round the
earth, it logically follows that the latter is a plane
surface, apart, of course, from the irregularities of the
mountains, which fills with the oceans the lower part
of the cavity in which it is situated. The polar regions
would, therefore, lie flat and extend to the base of
some of the circular walls surrounding Earth.

immaterial nature of the Moon,

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Solid Dome Of The Sky, part 2 (of 2)

The Solid Dome Of The Sky, part 2 (of 2)

sun illumination 8

This shadow can only reflect off a surface. Could this surface be the “dome” or “firmament”?

The ancients have said that rain is part of the
waters which exist on the other side of the vault and
which pass on to this side through cracks. It may be
remarked, in this connection, that rain is always discharged
at the end of a thunderstorm, that is, after
the sound of the splitting of the dome, otherwise the
thunder, has been heard; and this fact would seem to
substantiate the theory of the ancients concerning
ram.

Lightning is a phenomenon which results from the
electrification of the vault; but it must be explained
that the luminous branches and ramifications which
are observed in what is called forked lightning, are
not lightning at all, strictly speaking; neither do they
traverse the atmosphere as is believed. They correspond
to luminous electrical currents which travel in
the vault of the sky itself where they follow irregular
tracks, probably metallic veins; and it can also be
seen that they adopt the convex shape of the vault.

These currents contribute eventually to the accumulation
at a certain spot of the quantity of electricity
which is required to cause a discharge towards the
earth, which occurs then in a direct line.

The comets, meteors and shooting stars are phenomena
which also have their origin, like the so-called
forked lightning, in the mass of the vault. The
author, definitely, knows this to be the case. Comets
are spontaneous luminous manifestations which are
created by electrical reactions occurring in the vault
of the sky, and this explains their unexpected and
sudden appearances, as well as their rapid and
erratic movements, indifferently direct or retrograde.

The passage of a comet is not accompanied by sound,
that is to say that there is no electrical discharge like
in the case of lightning which causes the vault to
split and detonate. It can be surmised that lightning
takes place in the thickness of the vault, whereas a
comet is a surface phenomenon. The orbit of comets
which may be seen to sweep across the vast expanse
of the sky is described as parabolic. This means, in
fact, since the passage takes place on the surface of
the dome, that the orbit follows exactly the curvature
of same and acquires, therefore, a seemingly parabolic
shape.

The formation of comets seems to be due to the
influence of the satellite discs of the earth as they
pass at certain points of the vault of the sky; otherwise,
when they occupy certain degrees of the zodiac,
particularly the 29th degree of Sagittarius. In the
case of Encke’s comet of December 21st, 1795, the
sun was at the 29th degree of Sagittarius. In that of
Brook’s comet of November ll th, 1911, Mercury
was passing at the same degree, and again for
Donati’s comet, October 2nd, 1858, it was Mars
which was effecting its passage at this very spot. The
same remark applies, moreover, to the 3rd degree of
various signs, particularly Gemini. In the last case
mentioned, that of Donati’s comet, Uranus was at
the 3rd degree of Gemini. For Hailey’s comet which
returned on March 4th, 1910, Mercury was at the
same degree; Venus at the 2nd degree of Libra;
Mars at the 2nd degree of Cancer; while simultaneously
Saturn passed at the 29th degree of Aries, etc.

All these circumstances, which cannot be coincidences,
point evidently to the existence of a mathematical
law governing the formation of comets,
through the combined agencies of the satellites when
they pass simultaneously at various degrees of the
zodiac ; and since the satellites have a regular motion *
it follows that the periodicity of comets, if it does
exist, may be due to this fact.

Shooting stars are not to be confused with the stars
in the ordinary sense, which form the constellations
and move at a very slow pace. They are luminous
manifestations which glide rapidly on the surface of
the vault of heaven, without any electrical discharge
towards the earth. They are, thus, related to vault
lightning, especially as they sometimes can be heard
to emit crackling sounds like sparks.

Meteors are also luminous phenomena resulting
from electrical reactions which occur in the vault of
the sky. It has been observed that they are frequently
accompanied by detonations and by a sound similar
to that of thunder, which is, therefore, caused by the
splitting of the dome, so that there can be no doubt
as to their real origin. It has been calculated that the
height of meteors never exceeds 90 kilometers, and

this figure confirms the estimate which is given further
on of the probable distance of the vault of the
sky from the surface of the earth.

From the ancients we know that the heavens at the
beginning of time were adjacent to the earth, which
is consistent with the primeval dislocation from the
surrounding mass; and that they were progressively
lifted in the course of ages. This rising of the vault
could not have been very great. The mere fact that
the latter can be seen through a telescope under the
satellite discs of the earth, as well as with the unaided
eye, as stated previously, indicates that it cannot
be very far away. It is not true, either, that man’s
eyesight can cover an infinite distance, even with the
help of the most powerful instruments, keeping in
mind at the same time a possible magnifying effect
due to the different densities of the various atmospheric
layers, so that it must be accepted that the
dome of the sky is incredibly low. If it were at an
enormous distance, meteorites would disintegrate and
become pulverised, and rain be volatilised before
reaching the earth.

There is not, and there never will be, an absolutely
reliable method whereby the exact distance separating
the surface of the earth from the sky may be ascertained.
It is very doubtful, as a matter of fact,
whether the laws of physics which apply to terrestrial
conditions, would be still valid in the case of the
upper atmosphere and of the spaces adjacent to the
top of the dome, but certain data can be taken into
account.

The height of the Heaviside layer, which is the
dome of the sky, has been measured by the time
taken by radar waves to return to earth. This distance
has been given as being from 40 to 50 kilometers in
the day-time, and 90 kilometers during night-time;
but the figure obtained for the day may be considered
unreliable, since it may well be believed that an
acceleration takes place in the propagation of the
waves due to the heat of the sun.

It is known, on the other hand, that the thickness
of the atmosphere has also been measured. But the
atmosphere is invisible, and since the dome is the
only surface on which the eye can rest, it is clear
that the thickness of the atmosphere means the height
of the dome. In the 11th century the Arabs, by
measuring the duration of twilight, assuming that
their method is acceptable, established that this thickness
is 92 kilometers; and nowadays, by the same
method, a figure of 64 kilometers has been obtained.

A similar indication comes from Ceylon where the
inhabitants claim that the dome is there particularly
low, being only 40 miles high, i.e. 60 kilometers
from the earth; and it does not necessarily follow,
whether this statement is based on conviction only or
not, that it is untrue. This figure is also consistent
with the impression of the author who has seen and
observed the dome of the sky during a sufficiently
long period of time to enable its probable distance to
be judged, as well as humanly possible; and the conclusion
is that the distance separating the surface of
the earth from the sky, and which may vary in some
places, does not exceed 80 to 90 kilometers. The
first telescope used by Galileo, which was of his own
construction, had only a three-fold magnifying
power. Nevertheless, he could with this small instrument
see the eminences of the vault, described by
him as being the mountains of the moon; that is to
say, that instead of saying 80 to 90 kilometers, 50 to
60 might be nearer the mark.

The vault of the sky may not be absolutely rigid,
but may at intervals, alternately recede and advance,
so that under these conditions the changes of atmospheric
pressure would obviously result from the varying
heights of the vault.

The azure colour of the atmosphere may be due
to the presence in the surface of the sky of certain
metals or of their alloys, which provide a blue colouring
matter, such as copper oxide or cobalt. This latter
metal, particularly, which is used for producing
blue coloured glass, is found in very large quantities
in meteorites, and its colour could be diffused by the
sun on to the atmospheric layers, even if they do not
completely reach the top of the dome as the latter
could cast a reflection from a distance.

It might also be inferred that the reddish tint of
the transparent disc of Mars is due to the fact that
the part of the dome which underlies its orbit contains
iron oxide which provides a compound of this
colour.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The Solid Dome Of The Sky, part 1 (of 2)

The Solid Dome Of The Sky, part 1 (of 2)

dome-under-1
FROM the earliest times it has been believed and said
that the heavens were not an empty space, but a
solid surface. The Chaldeans and Egyptians regarded
the sky as the massive cover of the world; and in
India and Persia it was thought to be a metallic lid,
flat or convex, or even pyramidal. Up to the 17th
century the earth was always regarded as the centre
of an empty sphere with solid walls; and on this
account, it was always represented with a cover. This
indispensable complement, however, was eliminated
upon the advent of the theory of gravitation, for convenience
sake, as a solid dome limiting the space
round the earth would have rendered impossible the
extravagant motions of the planets which were sent
revolving in the air at phenomenal distances. Thus
from this time, the fact universally accepted for thousands
of years that the sky is a firm surface, completely
disappeared.*

*It should be noted, however, that the notion of the massive nature
of the sly still subsists in the language. The word firmament means
firm surface and the French word “ciel” is derived from coelum,
which signifies chiselled material.

Nevertheless, the possible existence
of a solid vault over the earth is a question of great
importance in view of the tremendous consequences
which would result from this fact, if it happened to be
true. There is no doubt that the general reaction is one
of incredulity; but, on the other hand, it can be considered
that it is not without reason that the ancients
believed in the existence of the material vault of
heaven; nor without reason, either, that this notion
should have been consistently handed down through
the ages since the earliest times up to the I 7th century,
in all parts of the world. The only alternative
would be to be able to prove the fact, but it would certainly
appear at the present time that there is no means
of doing so. It may be discovered, however, that a
solid dome effectively exists above our heads, in an
indirect and quite unexpected manner, which the
erroneous interpretation put on the composition of
the planets had not so far permitted to do. It can be
stated at this juncture, by anticipating on the next
chapter which deals with this particular subject, that
the planets are not solid, opaque masses of matter, as
is believed. They are simply immaterial, luminous
and transparent discs; and in view of these circumstances,
it is plain that the craters, asperities, mountains
and valleys which were thought to exist on the
surface of these imaginary masses, are the topographic
features of the solid vault of the sky which
are illuminated and thrown into relief by the luminous
and transparent discs which we call planets. It is also
to be realized that the lens of the telescope creates an
appearance of convexity which, standing out in relief,
conveys the impression of a spherical mass, but this
convexity effect is merely an optical illusion.

The dome of the sky can be seen not only through
the transparent satellite discs of the earth with the
help of the telescope, but also with the naked eye, in
rare circumstances, it is true, i.e. when it is lighted by
flashes of lightning during night thunderstorms. By
a remarkable chance and in similar conditions,
the author has seen the vault of heaven entirely
illuminated, and has even been able to observe it
steadily for several minutes, due to a rapid succession
of sheet lightning discharges providing a perfect and
continuous visibility. The remark may now be made
that, if the ancients maintained that the sky was a
solid mass, it was for the reason that they had ascertained
the fact in the same circumstances, as many
observers will now be able to do in the future. The
possibility, therefore, of taking photographs by night
of large areas of the vault of heaven can now be foreseen,
particularly in those parts of the world where
owing to the frequency of thunderstorms, there are
numerous opportunities of doing so.

The aspect of the vault was that of a rather steep,
slightly sloping dome of pyramidal shape, and it
appeared to be composed of a bright metallic
dark grey matter, uniformly showing small regular
inequalities like lead which has been beaten or
chiselled. The larger details, particularly the craters,
were clearly visible against the background; but the
most impressive circumstance yet, was the incredible
nearness of the vault, the highest point of which did
not appear to be, at the most, any more than sixty
kilometers from the earth. It may be recalled in this
connection that in one of the texts of Homer, it is
stated that the height of the bell-shaped vault which
surrounds the earth is only twice that of Mount
Olympus, approximately six kilometers. This estimation,
evidently impossible, and which must have
probably resulted from the exceptional purity of the
atmosphere in Greece which may be deceptive, gives,
nevertheless, an idea of the manner in which this
question of the distance of the vault of the sky from
the earth, to which we shall return later on, is to be
envisaged.

It results, therefore, from the foregoing explanations,
that the existence of a dome of matter encircling
the earth cannot be denied; and this fact completely
revolutionizes the present day concepts on the outer
world. The earth is not freely suspended in space, but
it is resting on the floor of a cavity whose walls surround
it on all sides. The sidereal expanse does no
longer extend over unlimited and undetermined distances.

The dimensions of our Universe are now
known to be restricted, and they are confined by the
circular wall which encircles the earth. It is by this
obstacle that the radar waves are reflected; and we
may also recall, in this respect, the theory of Heaviside
leading to the existence of an upper, wave resisting
atmospheric layer, which is no other than
the solid vault of the sky. There is absolutely no
solid body between the earth and the dome of heaven,
since the constellations, like the planets, are nothing
but luminous phenomena.

The meteorites are obviously fragments which
become detached from the vault and reach the earth.
These masses when analysed prove to include a high
percentage of metal, from which we can conclude
that the inherent brilliance of the sky is due to the
presence of metals in its composition. The fact is
that the earth, at the beginning of time, must neces-
sarily have become separated from the adjoining
mass which constitutes now the vault of heaven; and,
therefore, the parts now divided must contain the
same elements. All the metals and ores of the earth
are consequently present in the surface of the sky.
An association is actually made between metals and
the sky, since the latter is instinctively compared to
lead and copper in very hot countries where broiling
temperatures intensify its metallic action and render
it more perceptible.

In classical literature there are two specific references
to the metallic nature of the sky, apart from
the one to be found in the Egyptian cosmology, but
the former may not be independent of the latter.
First, we read in the poems of Homer that star-strewn
Olympus, dwelling of the Gods, is made of glittering
bronze; and secondly, in the Old Testament, the
prophet Job gives what may be regarded as an exact
definition of the sky when he proclaims it to be a
mirror of metal. It is to be observed, in this connection,
that when poetical reference is made to the silver
mirror of the moon, it is the metallic surface of the
dome appearing under the transparent disc which,
in reality, may be described as a silver mirror. It
may further be remarked that in the mythology of the
Orient the attribute of the sun goddess is the sacred
mirror. This is another association with the true
nature of the vault; and it must be admitted that the
latter, especially when it shines and sparkles under
the sun, undoubtedly looks like a mirror.

It has frequently been observed that there is a
resemblance between glass and the sun. In the 6th
century B.C. Empedocles regarded the sun as a
vitreous body which collects and reflects the light of
the ether, but has no luminous power of its own.

The British astronomer Palmer, in the last century,
held the view that the sun is a lens which, he also
said, transmits to us the rays emanating from the
Almighty. It is further known that Ptolemy in his
system of the constitution of the Universe, speaks of
the existence of a crystalline sky, i.e. a sky in the
nature of a transparent mineral substance. One may
think, in this connection, that it is not impossible
that due to the heat developed by the passage of the
sun’s disc, there may be a fusion and vitrification of
the siliceous materials contained in the vault, so that
it becomes coated in certain places with a layer of
glass, which would communicate to the solar disc by
transparency, identical properties, so that it might
become similar to a lens. The presence of dross or
slag similar to that formed on fused metal has also
been observed on the surface of the sun, which is
really, owing to its transparency, the foundation of
the sky, and this seems to confirm the possibility of
thermal and chemical reactions taking place among
the elements which compose the vault.

It can now be understood that the light and the
heat which appeared to be produced by the sun do
not proceed from this source, but are due to a burning
glass effect which is generated by the brilliant
metallic surface of the vault under the luminous disc.
Under these conditions, all the vivifying and beneficial
properties which are attributed to the sun must
be transferred to the solid dome of the sky, as well
as the rays. These are not the sun’s rays, but they are
the rays of the metallic surface of the vault.

It is also obvious that the electrical discharges
which produce lightning take place between the mass
of the earth and that of the dome of the sky. It can
further be surmised that parts of the dome expand,
and split or explode under the stress of the passage
of the intense electrical currents and of their discharge;
hence the short detonations called thunder
claps, which are later amplified into loud rumblings,
and reverberated in the interior of the vast cavern
which contains the earth. It can further be remarked
that crashes of thunder are always immediately
followed by a metallic resonance similar to that of
bronze or brass; and it can be said that this particular
resounding, which is clearly perceptible, is certainly
produced by the metallic walls of the vault which
are made to shake and vibrate under the stress of the
detonations.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 2 Comments