Christogenea and Flat Earth

It has come to my attention that there is a good Christian by the name of William Finck who talks about the flat earth on his website, christogenea.org He bascially said that Christian Identity people should not get into the flat earth debate and that it doesn’t really matter what shape the earth is. Below is the text that Finck wrote for his podcast along with the link to his page if you want to hear the podcast yourself. Below the text is my comments on where William Finck is wrong. I will also write another article to give my critique on the podcast itself. THEN you decide what position good Christians should take. I would like to hear your comment below.

First is William Finck’s article as it appears on his website:

William Finck Sat. Sept 12, 2015

http://christogenea.org/podcasts/round-earth-roundtable

Is our planet Earth flat? Probably not. But in any case, certain of the flat-earthers are lying about many things. Should Identity Christians care if the Earth is flat? Probably not. And no matter what you may think, the original language of the Bible does not insist that it is. Identity Christians should keep themselves above and away from all of the fringe conspiracy theories that discredit our cause, distract us from what we should be doing, and drive people away from our core message, which is indeed true.

And if the earth is flat, will the Jews stop flooding Christendom with niggers? Certainly not. If the earth is flat, will the usury-based banking system fall? Certainly not yet. If the earth is flat, will the yellow and brown vermin infecting and overrunning our society disappear? No, they will not disappear until the true children of Israel repent of their sins annd turn back to Yahweh their God. That will not be accomplished through a flat-earth idol.

Comment on William Finck and the Flat Earth:

I will make Finck’s comments in regular type and mine in italics:

Is our planet Earth flat? Probably not.

Notice he said “probably.” Well, is it or isn’t the earth flat? Finck uses the word “probably” again. This indicated to me he’s not certain.

And no matter what you may think, the original language of the Bible does not insist that it is.

The original language DOES say many things that are contrary to what astronomers say, such as: the earth is fixed, doesn’t move, has foundations and has edges. Though the words “flat earth” doesn’t appear is not the point. You can get what the Bible means by other words. Just like the Bible does not say, “Don’t let blacks into your country,” the Bible doesn’t have to say that for us to know that having other races live among us is wrong. So, Finck’s arguments are wrong here.

Identity Christians should keep themselves above and away from all of the fringe conspiracy theories that discredit our cause…

Where does he get the idea that we should keep away fringe conspiracy theories?! This is who we are, especially those who call themselves “Christian Identity.” Firstly ANY conspiracy would be called fringe by those who kiss the backside of the government. And since when did CI people keep to just what is in the Bible. Since the time of Wesley Swift, Bertrand Comparet and Sheldon Emry, we have looked into other crooked things the government has done or has covered up, so why not now? For example, Pastor Sheldon Emry had told us about the vaccine dangers and even sold booklets to his Christian Identity followers on this subject. Why? Because it’s something that God’s people should know about. It’s a conspiracy just like the flat earth. In fact, the doctors would call those who are opposed to vaccinations as “fringe conspiracy nuts,” too. The doctors would label us the same for being flat earthers.

William Finck himself has a sub-domain on Hitler and WWII. He knows that WWII was started by the Allies as well as WWI and I agree with him. I’m glad that he has a lot of information on this subject, including about Hitler himself and National Socialism. Well, this is ANOTHER CONSPIRACY, so why is it OK for Finck to have his conspiracy but not the flat earth?!

…distract us from what we should be doing, and drive people away from our core message, which is indeed true.

The flat earth is not distracting because it’s revealing the truth. Finck tells us that it’s “distracting.” Well, when he talks about WWII or 9-11 isn’t that distracting? In a sense, it is not talking about Identity but does everything have to be about Identity? No. People who are into Identity also want to know other truths and knowing about what really happened on September 11, 2001 in New York City is of interest to CI people. In short, does everything have to be “who are God’s chosen people”? No. That’s because when you talk about other government cover ups people can see how our information is controlled.

And if the earth is flat, will the Jews stop flooding Christendom with niggers? Certainly not. If the earth is flat, will the usury-based banking system fall?

Christian Identity people who ALSO know about the flat earth do not claim that knowing about the flat earth will stop blacks from flooding into the US nor will it stop the use of usury that is destroying the economy. So, why put words in other peoples’ mouths? But knowing that Hitler wanted peace has nothing to do with Identity either. Yet, William Finck covers that on his website. I’m not complaining that he has a section of his website dedicated to Hitler nor does many other people who regularly goes on his website, so why make the statement that talking about the flat earth is distracting?

No, they will not disappear until the true children of Israel repent of their sins and turn back to Yahweh their God. That will not be accomplished through a flat-earth idol.

Flat earthers never made that claim, so why do you Pastor Finck? And as far as charging flat earth believers with that being their idol, is just a plain lie.

But why should Christian Identity people know about the true nature of the earth? For a couple of reasons:

1 – This proves that we are being lied about in a huge way

2 – The earth is God’s creation and it’s important to know about His creation

3 – It’s important to know about geography, unless you want to be like the millions of young people who are not taught that because of the dumbing down process in the schools.

4 – That the Bible talks a lot about the earth and its nature, so it is only logical to know about what the Bible says.

In closing, here are some (of many verses) about the true nature of earth as recorded in the Bible:

1 Chronicles 16:30: “He has fixed the earth firm, immovable.”

Psalm 93:1: “Thou hast fixed the earth immovable and firm …”

Psalm 96:10: “He has fixed the earth firm, immovable …”

Psalm 104:5: “Thou didst fix the earth on its foundation so that it never can be shaken.”

Isaiah 45:18: “…who made the earth and fashioned it, and himself fixed it fast…”

The most striking feature of the Old Testament world is the “firmament,” a solid dome which separates “the waters from the waters” (Gen. 1:6). The Hebrew word translated in the Latin Vulgate as firmamentum is raqia’ whose verb form means “to spread, stamp or beat out.” The material beaten out is not directly specified, but both biblical and extrabiblical evidence suggests that it is metal. A verb form of raqia’ is used in both of these passages: “And gold leaf was hammered out…” (Ex. 39:3); and “beaten silver is brought from Tarshish” (Jer. l0:9). There are indeed figurative uses of this term. A firmament is part of the first vision of Ezekiel (1:22,26), and the editors of the evangelical Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament cite this as evidence that the Hebrews did not believe in a literal sky-dome. It is clear, however, that Ezekiel’s throne chariot is the cosmos in miniature, and the use of raqia’ most likely refers to a solid canopy (it shines “like crystal”) than to a limited space.

Posted in Bible and Flat Earth | Tagged | 1 Comment

Flat Earth and Yoga

What does the flat earth and yoga have in common? Not much, unless you are a flat earth believer and you do yoga.

Since flat earthers are into conspiracies, because the fact that the earth is flat is one huge conspiracy, you may want to know of another conspiracy. Many flat earthers have knowledge of other conspiracies way before they learned about the flat earth conspiracy – at least I did. Yet few of us “conspiracy theorist” realise that there is a conspiracy connected with yoga.

Back in the 1960s was the start of many eastern philosophies and practices entering Western countries. Previously, all this was contained in India and the far east. Yoga, as you know came from India and it is tied to the Buddhist religion. Buddhism, in turn, it tied to Hinduism. Both are pagan beliefs and as such there are lies and deception in them.

People from India who practice yoga and know its history will tell you that it’s impossible to separate yoga from Buddhism. Thus, they laugh at stupid Westerners who think they can tie yoga with Christianity.

Yoga is much more than just stretching – there is a danger to your health and to your spiritual well-being. With that, I’ll let the video below tell you the rest. You can find other videos on the dangers of yoga by simply going to Google or YouTube and do a search with the words: yoga danger, danger of yoga or any other adjectives with the word yoga. Many of these videos are by former yoga teachers – so they should know.

“So why is yoga promoted if it’s so bad?”

Well, like all the other conspiracies there is a common thread and with yoga it is that the same people who want to control you and enslave you are behind this.

“How can they control you with yoga?”

Yoga is tied to Buddhism and with it is another religion which takes you away from God. There are many things that takes away your trust and belief in the Bible and yoga is one of them. Anything that gets you to doubt the Bible will be a victory of the anti-ChristS who rule over us. Stop and think about this, why didn’t you believe in the flat earth years ago? Because you lost trust in the Bible or you thought that many parts of it is just myth, legend or allegory. You might have read a little of the Bible but you never got into the study of it. Why? Because these Eastern philosophies, some of which are covered up by names such as “Spirituality” or what is common known as “New Age” material that teaches, “You can have peace, prosperity and health by reading (fill in the name of the book).” Well, such is not the case.

Had we not been distracted, and I was one of those who were, we would have known that the God of the Bible told us that the earth didn’t move. I know I would have learned earlier if I had studied the Bible more. Even if I didn’t, I would have had a discerning spirit and would have know when I was lied to by the astronomers, NASA scientists and others.

Click Here to see more.

Here are a couple of verses about the foundations of the earth. As you know, if something has foundations it does NOT MOVE.

Psa_104:5 Who laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not be removed for ever.

Pro_8:29 When he gave to the sea his decree, that the waters should not pass his commandment: when he appointed the foundations of the earth:

Isa_51:13 And forgettest the LORD thy maker, that hath stretched forth the heavens, and laid the foundations of the earth; and hast feared continually every day because of the fury of the oppressor, as if he were ready to destroy? and where is the fury of the oppressor?

Posted in Bible and Flat Earth | Tagged | Leave a comment

NASA And Fake Earth Images

Fake pictures of earth

Fake pictures of earth

   Here are four images of the earth; I’ll label them A, B, C, D, starting from the top left to right, then the bottom left to right.

Photo A: The tip of South America leaves no room for the ocean and Antarctic, which is beneath it.

Photo B: Where South America is suppose to be, you see a lot of blue – which indicated the ocean. So, where is the land?

Photo C: Look at how huge the US is – there is no room for Canada and Alaska! There also is no room for South America.

Photo D: Again, it looks like there is no room for Canada and Alaska. Also look at the right side of the photo and how much brighter it is; there seems to be a marked contracts line. In reality, there should be gradual darkness. In this bright area, there is also a “hot spot.” This only happens when the light source is close. This is not how daylight is on the earth.

If someone says these pictures are not from satellites but are computer generated images (CGI), then there is still something wrong. First, if they are CGI why use them? After all, we have thousands of satellites not to mention the space station that can take pictures, so there is no need to resort to Photoshop images. But if they are CGI, why can’t the computer graphic artists do a decent job, as this is easy to do. No, what you see is different proportions of continents to the circumference of the earth.

So, why are these crappy pictures used? My thought is, that people are being sick and tired of the lies the Federal Government tells people, and they know what happens to whistle-blowers. Many of these people either lose their jobs and lose their chance of being hired elsewhere. They also know that some whistle-blowers end up dead. Since people have to eat and support their family they figure it’s better to “do their job;” they do it in such a way to tell others without losing their jobs. They hope that intelligent people can see the mistakes with the hope that the public wakes up.

Have these photos woken you up?

Posted in NASA Space Programs | Tagged | 1 Comment

How To Introduce People To The Flat Earth

Here are some ideas that I found helpful when talking to people about the flat earth for the first time.

It’s very important to approach people in the right way with the flat earth news, if you don’t, they will cut you off, they will also think you are a “nutter” and might try to avoid you in the future. If you start off by saying something like, “Do you know the earth is flat,” this is a BIG NO NO.

Starting Off

The very first thing you want to do is to make sure the person you are talking to has about 1 hour of free time. If you finish earlier, that is fine but one hour is a good start. If you can only talk for about 10 minutes, you won’t have the time to convince them or even have them question their current beliefs. By not having the time to explain, they will think you are a nut and won’t want to hear the subject again.

If found out from personal experience that the best way to start off talking about the flat earth is by asking interesting questions and by making statements. Here are some suggestions, you may think of others but with the examples below, you’ll know the direction to take.

Some examples statements and questions are:

We all know that water seeks its own level; that water can’t remain on the side of a hill or remain on any surface that is not flat.

We know that 150mph winds can destroy buildings. Imagine what 1,000mph wind can do.

We can see the same stars, the same constellations each night. In fact, the same stars have been seen for thousands of years. But no one can explain how these stars can follow the earth and keep the same relationship to each other AND to earth while the earth is traveling around the Sun.

How come we can’t feel we are upside down when we are in Australia, for example?

How can our atmosphere remain on the surface of the earth when we are traveling 67,000mph around the Sun without it being blow away? How can we not feel this tremendous movement? How is it that we can go outside and not feel any wind blowing? Scientists really don’t have answers for this.

If the earth is spinning at 1,000mph – as we are told by astronomers and NASA – how can a plane land? If a plane is traveling in the same direction of the earth spin, how can they catch up to the runway to land or even make it to their destination for that matter?

Why does the horizon always meet up at eye level (whether we are on a mountain 5,000 feet or 10,000 feet or flying at 35,000 feet)? Scientists say that when on a globe the horizon drops off – it’s a law of physics.

These questions should stir interest in your friend. If it doesn’t, they might not have any interest in the world around them; they might just like their football and beer. In that case, you can leave them just where they are. If they show interest, then continue.

The point of asking questions and giving statements like this should stir curiosity in the people. Curiosity is one of the strongest emotions to motivate people. With motivation, you should be able to start answering these questions.

Peppering Your Statements

It’s good to “pepper” your statements with: as we are told by astronomers and NASA, as this is using their words. You can also add: scientists, astrophysicists, etc. Since the average person respects these people and they are used to follow authority, you have a bases to start from. Putting these words in your introduction AND by talking in “the third person singular” the person you are talking to will not be “poo-pooing” you. After all, you are repeating what scientists have told us – which your friend might already believe and has respect for.

Answering Your Questions

Now is the time to answer your questions. Keep your talk going, don’t allow them to butt in, at least not at this time. Answer their questions during the Q&A.

When you are talking about the flat earth, bring up the questions that most people will have AND answer them. This will strike doubt from their minds before they have time to ask the question themselves or before they make a statement themselves. Of course, answer their question after your little talk. The point is, you don’t want people to go off on a tangent, down a rabbit trail or they won’t learn anything and neither will others there.

Tell your audience, “Don’t believe me but do your own research.”

After the talk you can hand them a business card that has some links on it for their further research.

I hope this helps.

Posted in General Flat Earth Topics | Leave a comment

Waking Up People With The Flat Earth Truth

I was recently asked about the way to wake people up with the flat earth truth. One of the best ways is to send family and friends a link in an email about a video that talks about the flat earth (example of one below):

The one given here is good as it has good video clips and pictures when the people are talking. A video with this is much better than just an audio or two guys talking at a table. Video clips, pictures and computer graphics engages the people and it also helps them conceptualise what the person is talking about. You may find other videos on YouTube that illustrates what they are talking about.

Another advantage of a video is that you don’t have to know all the answers. That’s, of course, the video is by someone who knows the flat earth subject well. This relives the burden of you talking.

Business Card

Another method of getting the flat earth truth out is with a business card. You can be creative and have a picture of the earth with some statement that arouses curiosity. You don’t want something that says, “Learn about the the flat earth,” as people are conditioned to react in a negative way and to think you are a “nutter.” You may have something like, “NASA reveals secrets of the earth,” or “A secret that will change your world view,” or something like this. With the case of NASA, we know that they have not personally revealed it but you can say, “NASA is revealing the secrets of the earth by making stupid statements; they want us to read between the lines,” which they are in essence doing.

The link you want to put on the card is not a YouTube link as it is hard for someone to copy this into their browser. What you can do is find a good video on someone’s website that has a good video and copy that link. Or, you can put up blog (using WordPress is best) and have a name address to print on the card rather than something that is a bunch of numbers and letters in large and small case.

Using the card method is good if you don’t have time to talk to someone.

Sitting a person down in front of a computer

If you have the opportunity to sit someone down in front of your computer or their computer, you can simply watch a good video and you’ll be there to answer any questions.

Talking to someone

The last thing you would do is to personally talk to someone. This is only good if both you and your friend have the time to discuss the flat earth. You should allow about 1 hour for this. This is recommended if you know the flat earth subject well, otherwise, he won’t want to hear it again. If you do talk to someone have a business card with the appropriate links on it. Give them to your guest for further research they can do.

I hope this helps you in spreading the flat earth truth.

Posted in General Flat Earth Topics | Leave a comment

Flat Earth Believers vs Christian Deniers of the Flat Earth, part 1

Christians are the primary group of people who would be interested in knowing about the flat earth. After all, it is God’s creation that we are talking about. However, there are some very misinformed Christians who attack those who believe in the flat earth. In fact, some of them are not honest and they should know it. Below are excerpts from a long article on a major Christian website. This website primary aim and subject of conversation is Creationism. Their website is:

http://www.Creation.com

The article in question is titled: The flat-earth myth and creationism

They have about a dozen articles attacking in one way or another us Flat Earthers. Below are just excerpts from it followed by my comments. For the original article Click Here.

With this information, you’ll see that other such articles follow the same pattern. Then, you’ll be able to defend the flat earth knowledge.

First, we’ll look at the author of the article, Jerry Bergman. Now, this person is not just some person who stock shelves in a supermarket, he’s got 9 degrees, a couple of the Ph.D. So, he should know better. It just goes to show that people with all kinds of degrees can be dishonest as anyone else. I will not go over everything this Bergman said, as the article is 9 pages long.

My comments will be in italics.

The idea that Christians once commonly believed in a flat earth for theological reasons is a myth.

This is a statement made out of hand – Christians DID believe in a flat earth.

The story was invented to promote the claim that Christians have widely resisted scientific advancement due to doctrinal constraints.

The science is in the Bible! Early Christians (though not all of them) believed in the flat earth because it follows common sense.

A Google search of ‘creationists’ and ‘flat earthers’ produced 37,100 responses, and most of the articles reviewed in some way referred to creationists as ‘flat earthers’. An example is Schadewald’s claim that ‘flat-earthism is as well supported scripturally and scientifically as creationism.’3 He adds:

This is because the world leaders – I mean the real leaders – want it this way. They want to equate flat earth believers with stupid people. After all, if this is well ingrained in the people, who would want to be associated with stupid people. This way, it keeps people believing in the globe earth.If there was no negative association with believing in the flat earth, then more people will take the time in listening to what we have to say. You see, the key is to get the people not even to listen to it because if they listen to the arguments of a flat earth they will realise that it is the truth.

According to my research, flat-earth believers in the West consisted of only a handful, at best, of true believers and most of the last few adherents died decades ago. A flat-earth web site exists in Great Britain which is actually a discussion group about a variety of topics, and none of the members appear to be flat-earthers.

This is an outright lie by someone who many claim is smart; perhaps Jerry himself thinks he’s intelligent. How can he say that there are “few adherents died decades ago!” Has he been to YouTube sites where there are many videos on the flat earth with views of 10s of thousands? Some have over 100,000 views. Jerry also talks about “ a flat earth website exists in Great Britain,” as if there is only one in the whole country or in the whole world. By implication it sounds that way. Did he mention mine? No, as that would skew his figures. Did he mention Eric Dubay or Mark Sargent’s site? No, as that would show that this flat earth truth is gaining ground.

The most well known flat-earth believers were members of a religious organization headed by John Dowie. He ruled the town of Zion, Illinois, a small city on the shore of Lake Michigan.6 Dowie was deposed in 1906, and Wilbur Voliva led the group until he died in 1942.

This is old information and should be no reflections on the flat earth believers today.

Then the author goes on to talk about how the previous head of The Flat Earth Society, Charles K. Johnson was semi-illiterate and had many mistakes in spelling, grammar and logic. The word this so-called educated man should have used is semi-literate, not the other way around! Then he said how Johnson had many spelling and grammar mistakes.

This is a common ploy by people critics whether they be liberal, communist, Christian or Jews is – if you don’t have the facts you attack their grammar, you attack their mode of dress or anything else. Creationists don’t like it when Evolutionists do it them but here, Creationist do the same thing back when they are attacked. Anytime when you see this, you know they have a weak argument. Yet, if a supporter for their side – whatever that topic is – writes to them, they ignore their grammar and spelling mistake, they don’t use the “[sic]” which they are fond to use. After all, “He is one of us.” Such hypocrites!

Bergman goes on to attack Johnson organization and how his members were stupid, too. Now, how does he know that? The main point is nothing of science was discussed – not in this article or on other articles on the flat earth on creation.com site.

In short, whenever the messenger is attacked rather than the message, you know that person don’t have the facts to back them up, in this case, the flat earth. This, Charles K. Johnson did have facts in his newsletter.

For a sample of Charles Johnson’s flat earth publication, Click Here.

Posted in Reference Materials | Tagged | Leave a comment

Distance of Stars Debunked part 2

By “Richlion”

In the previous post, I talked about the stars and their so-called distance from the earth.

What I will cover in this article are:

Photos of stars and galaxies

What does the Bible say about the stars

Firmament – what is it?

Photos of stars and galaxies

galaxy-1  Your first comment might be, “What about all those photos of the stars and the galaxies – how can they be close to the earth without us burning up? How can they be close without the astronomers and NASA not telling us?”

I don’t want you to believe me but do your own research. Look at photos of galaxies on Google. Do you think that some someone with a computer and imaging editing software could do something like that? You’ve seen beautiful pictures like this in the films, and how was that done? By computers. Remember 2001 A Space Odessy shown to the world in 1968? That looked real and all that was done without the computer programs we have today.

Still don’t believe? I don’t expect you, so let’s go on. The pictures of the galaxies usually has a section done in beuatiful color; any color you can think of are part of galaxies. Take one galaxy that has, for example, a magneta color that fills space that looks like it could cover 100 or 1,000 light years in length. Now, what produces that? Surely it can be a star as any star that gives off that much light would destroy all the stars and planet within that area. And where is that HUGE star? All I’ve seen are little points of lights – nothing so big that would justify such a huge part of the galaxy to light up.

Now, take a look at one of our planets in our solar system; pick one out any one. Say Saturn. When you bring up images on Google, why are there so many variations? Why are the rings of different shapes. Sure, there are some things that are kept the same, they do have to put rings around it, an they do have the “eye” that is always there, but there are too many other variations. Now, look at those photos again, can they be made by computer imaging graphics? Sure they can.

In short, all these “photos” are done by computer or by hand. Look at the artificial satellites – they are really fake looking. Look how show-room clean they are and look at the beautiful composite with the sun and the earth lined up just right – it looks like a studio shot.

I know you need more convincing than this, so let’s explore some more…

What does the Bible say about the stars

galaxy-2   There are many verses that has the word “stars” in them. We read that the seed of Abraham is compared to the stars in multitude. But what we want to look at is different context for stars. Here are some of them (this list is not complete but it will give you an idea):

Gen_1:16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.

If stars were huge balls of fire, and that there are billions and trillions of them, don’t you think it would take God longer than a week to make them?

Job_9:7 Which commandeth the sun, and it riseth not; and sealeth up the stars.

Why “seal up the stars” that are billions of light years away?

Job_22:12 Is not God in the height of heaven? and behold the height of the stars, how high they are!

If the Universe is what we are told, then a “height of the stars” would have no meaning. There is no “up or down” in space; where is the base point, the ground from which to measure the height of something?

Job_38:7 When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?

This sounds like something more that a nuclear chain reaction of plasma gas that is million miles in diameter. It sounds like something that has intelligence and sings.

Psa_147:4 He telleth the number of the stars; he calleth them all by their names.

Now, there could be 3,000 stars and God knows all their names but a billion x a billion stars and knowing their names?

Dan_8:10 And it waxed great, even to the host of heaven; and it cast down some of the host and of the stars to the ground, and stamped upon them.

This verse gives us the first indication of the size of stars. If stars are what we are told, even one star getting closer than 93 million miles would burn up the earth. So, how can stars come to the earth, unless they are very small and NOT a burning mass of gasious fire? It looks like these stars can be stamped upon, which would also indicate that there would be life still on the earth and not mass destruction. Now, many preachers would say, “This is figurative.” What I’ve notice that anything that preachers can’t explain, or that is “politically incorrect” they tell us it’s figurative!

Joe_3:15 The sun and the moon shall be darkened, and the stars shall withdraw their shining.

Why should God darken the stars millions of light years away from here? We wouldn’t notice the difference. And, since we are TOLD that there is life on other planets, why should other people suffer?

Rev_1:16 And he had in his right hand seven stars: and out of his mouth went a sharp twoedged sword: and his countenance was as the sun shineth in his strength.

Seven stars in his right hand, sounds like something that can fit in your hand. Is this figurative, too? Read the rest of article before you determine it.

Rev_1:20 The mystery of the seven stars which thou sawest in my right hand, and the seven golden candlesticks. The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches: and the seven candlesticks which thou sawest are the seven churches.

Rev_2:1 Unto the angel of the church of Ephesus write; These things saith he that holdeth the seven stars in his right hand,

Again, an indication that something is small.

Rev_6:13 And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind.

Here we read of stars falling to earth and comparing it to fig leaves. First, if stars are what we are told, then why would God use something that is the biggest thing you can image as a figure of speech, why not something that is more likely to happen? Also, notice the words “fell unto earth.” When is space what is the horizon, what can fall, what is up and down? There aren’t any. Keep this in mind as we read on.

Firmament – what is it?

Here are some verses with the word “firmament” in it:

Gen_1:6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.

So, what is the firmament?

Firmament Strong’s H 7549 It’s a streching or covering of the sky.

Gen_1:7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.

It looks like something that divides the waters from the waters.

Gen_1:8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.

Gen_1:14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:

This firmament there are stars in them, as stars help determine the seasons.

Gen_1:15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.

Gen_1:17 And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,

This indicates that it has to be relatively close to the earth. Stars thousands of light years away can’t be much use to us in giving light.

Gen_1:20 And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.

This, I would interpet as the atmosphere where the fowl fly and not the region where the stars are.

Psa_19:1 To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David. The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.

We can see the beauty of God’s handiwork in the stars we do see; they don’t have to be a billion billion stars – which we can’t see. Some preachers would say these billions of stars show’s God’s handiwork but why can’t they see that thosands of stars can’t show his handiwork, too?

Psa_150:1 Praise ye the LORD. Praise God in his sanctuary: praise him in the firmament of his power.

Eze_1:22 And the likeness of the firmament upon the heads of the living creature was as the colour of the terrible crystal, stretched forth over their heads above.

Notice the word “crystal” we’ll come back to that later.

Dan_12:3 And they that be wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament; and they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever.

Again, and indication that there are stars in the firmament.

The Bible says a lot about the “firmament” yet few people realize it. I will tell you something here that I have not read on any other flat earth website or seen on a video; I came across this quite by accident. I looked up the word “firmament” in Noah Webster’s 1828 Dictionary. This is the first dictionary that was complied in America. Back in early America, Christian education was part of educating a child (most of them were home schooled then). In this dictionary when a word is used, many times it would refer to the book and verse in the Bible where it’s found. Christians back then knew much more than Christians today. Noah Website was widely read and he must have learned of something that most people back then did not know. Here is the dictionary entry for “frimament.”

Webster 1828 Dictionary Firmament 1 Consisteing of crystal, as a crystaline palace. 2 Crystaline heavens, in ancient astronomy, two spheres inbetween primum mobile and the firmament, in the Ptolemaic system, which supposed the heavens to be solid and only susceptible of a single motion.

Here we are told that this firmament is like crystal, a mass of some sort. Also, this firmament is mobile and there is motion to it.

In your older Strong’s Concordance of the Bible, the word “firmament” has a meaning that it’s “beaten out, something that is like beaten brass.”

This firmament is believed by some scholars, especially those of centuries ago, that this is over the earth, above where the planes fly and is a dome that reaches down to the outer rim of the earth. This dome keeps our atmosphere in. Inside are the stars, but the stars are little points of light not a million miles in diameter plasma gases. And it is this dome that revolves around the earth, which gives the stars motion. It would be liken to a glass bell jar and within the glass there are the thousands of stars. Then, this bell jar slowly moves around the earth. Therefore, we can’t fly beyond this point or even to it in most cases.

What we see with out telescopes is within this firmament; the rest (all the galaxies) are made with CIG and even paintings. This gives us the impression that there are billions of stars, and thus, our Universe.

I hope you have a better idea of the stars and their relationship to the earth. You’ll probably still have other questions but I hope that you had more of your questions answered. As time goes on, we’ll try to address more questions. So, stay tuned to this blog, bookmark it and tell your friends about it – we appreciate it. God bless you and yours.

Copyright © 2015 ChristianFlatEarthMinistry.Wordpress.com

Posted in Sun Moon Stars | Tagged | Leave a comment

Distance of Stars Debunked, part 1

  Astronomer tell us that the stars are anywhere from a few light years away to billions of light years away. We are also told that all the stars are traveling at the speed of light – away from where the “Big Bang” occurred. Finally, we are told that our earth is also moving away from where the “Big Bang” occurred, while, at the same time traveling around the Sun at 67,000mph. If that wasn’t enough our solar system is traveling around The Milky Way at 500,000. Wow! Is all this true? Is all this possible? I say this is not true.

The closest star is said to be Alpha Centauri at 4.37 light years. Ursa Major group is about 80 light years. The furthest is the earliest starts that supposedly shot off during the Big Bang, being 13 billion light years, and, of course, there is all the distance in-between. For our purposes let’s just look at starts that are within 100 light years from earth. Keep this in mind as I continue…

To determine IF the stars are moving, each in their respective directions, let’s first take a look at something from home so we can comprehend all this.

Say you are looking up to your left and there is a jet plane traveling at 500mph at 1,000 feet over head, it would go by fast. Now, this same jet, going at the same speed and going in the same direction is flying at 30,000 feet; it would look like it’s flying much slower. Why? We all know that the further from us the object is, the slower it will appear. This has to do with what is called “parallax.”

Definition: Parallax is a displacement or difference in the apparent position of an object viewed along two different lines of sight, and is measured by the angle or semi-angle of inclination between those two lines. Nearby objects have a larger parallax than more distant objects when observed from different positions, so parallax can be used to determine distances.

So, seeing an object move slower that is far away does not mean that object is moving slow – we all know this.

Now, back to seeing stars at night. On a clear night and away from city lights we can see the stars move across the sky. If you were to spot the Big Dipper early in the evening, and you looked out a couple of hours later, you would see it had moved a good distance across the sky. Now, with stars being, say, 100 light years away, that is a HUGE distance. How can that much movement in a few hours be possible? They would have to be moving many, many times the speed of light. In fact, every star in the heavens would have to be moving like that. What would it be, 100 times the speed of light, 1,000 times? In short, the further away the stars are the faster they would have to move, as they all move in unison, so they would have to be moving faster.

The problem with this (and there is more than one problem) and that is, how can stars move that fast without disintegrating? How can their planet hold up to the speed of light much less 1,000 times the speed of light? In fact, how can anything withstand 500,000 mile per HOUR?

How do you determine the truth?

There are two things to consider, and this applies not only to astronomy but to any other topic you can discuss.

1 There are things that we are told

2 There are things that we experience – reality

Now, if you are into the New Ager and follower of David Icke, that there is no reality. Then the System got you! The Elite wants you to believe in no reality, that way it’s easy for you to suspend judgement – then they can tell you anything and you’ll believe anything.

I’m digressing now, so let’s get back on track…

When you are told one thing and you experience another, take the experience as evidence and you’ll be on the right track. (This is not an optical illusion, so we can rule this out.)

“So, where are the stars?”

Well, they have to be a lot closer than what we are told. Now we are TOLD something else, that the stars range in size from something smaller than our Sun, which we are TOLD is about 800,000 miles in diameter to starts that are millions of miles in diameter. (Our Sun is small, so we are told.) Now, with stars that size, they can’t be close or they would be touching each other, and if they are real close – even right out side of our solar system – then we would burn up.

So, we have to settle the size of the stars, what are they exactly and how far (rough approximate) they are from the earth.

One thing that we have determined is that these stars are not billions of light years away, they are not millions or even thousands of light years away. They are much, much closer but I’ll leave that for another article, so check on this blog for that article Distance of Stars Debunked, part 2.

Posted in Sun Moon Stars | Tagged | 3 Comments

Christians and the Flat Earth

Christians who write against the flat earth avoid writing about the hard science if they did they would be flat earthers themselves. The only way they can hold up their errors of beliefs is to avoid talking about science. What they talks about instead is: “Did early Christians believe in the flat earth? Did St. _________ believe in the flat earth? The early Christians did NOT believe in the flat earth.” It’s is statements like this that does NOT address the flat earth issue but side steps.

Once the facts are looked at these Christians will have to look and re-examine the scriptures again. So, what are the scientific facts?

If the earth is a globe and the circumference is 25,000 – which we are told by sceintists who believe in the globe earth model, than you can compute the curvature at any given distance. So, let’s go with what they say and what the math says. For the earth being 25,000 miles in circumference, that would mean that the first mile there would be a drop-off of 8 inches. To determine the drop-off of any distance, you would square the distance, multiplied by 8 inches. For a distance of 50 miles, the math would be: 50×50=2,500×8=20,000 inches. To get feet, you’d divide it by 12, which equals 1,666 feet.

What does this mean?

This means that in order for a ship to be see the light house the light house would have to be at least 1,666 feet high. Now, we know that light houses are not that high. If the one in question is 150 feet high that means the top of it would still be 1,000 feet under the horizon. Since it’s a fact that an object can be seen 50 miles from a ship (weather permitting of course) it would be impossible to see it IF the earth is a globe.

Flat earthers are NOT disputing the circumference of the earth, as a flat earth’s equator would be mid-way between the North Pole and the outer edge. Thus, the math is correct (using spherical geometry). But you can still see the light house. Now, we know that light can’t be seen through miles of ocean and we know that solid object can’t be seen through solid objects either.

Let’s take another real life example. Many years ago a man on an English canal put a telescope about one foot above the water. He had a friend in a row boat sail to the 6 mile point. This canal has a straight 6 mile section. Once he reached the mark, the other man standing in the canal look through the telescope and could see the man and the boat down to the water line. The math for this is: 6×6=36x8in=288 in / (divide sign) = 24 feet. This means that the man should not be able to see his friend at all – he would be below the curvature of the earth; that if his friend stood up (assuming he was 6 feet tall) he would still be 18 feet below the line of sight. This is mathmatical proof that the earth is flat!

You can do this experiment yourself. All you need is a telescope, anohter person, paper and pen. If you don’t have a friend, then take a tree or tall object, drive in your can the distance you want in a straight line; and take that distance and do the math.

Back to Christians and the Flat Earth

There are many other facts that can be looked at but the Chrisitan sites I’ve been to, do not address the facts, they point out what so ancient Roman catholic church leader believed in. First, it doesn’t matter what they believed in – we have to look at the facts. We know that there are many false prophets – back 2,000 years ago and today. There could be others who are sincere but they are sincerely wrong.

If you are undecided or if you are still a globe earth believer, that is fine. But ask yourself this – if you sincerely are looking for the truth – that you should hear what the “other side” says and not ignore those arguments. Now, if some preacher thinks he’s being smart, he can easily lose some of his followers by them seeing what he is doing.

The website that I have in mind is creation.com where they are mostly writing about creationism. They by no means cover the many, many other topics that are in the Bible. It seams like we have “specialist pastors” as we have specialist doctors. What a strange kind of bird. I feel sorry for the Christian that goes to this type of site and thinks it’s the begin all and end all of Christianity, but continuing, how would this pastor or contributing writers of this website like it when they are treated this way by Evolutionists? They don’t like it and they make it known. In fact, they would charge the Evolutionist with ignoring the facts or the statements that they (the Creationist) make. YET, they do the exact same thing as their adversary does; I’ve seen this so many times with other topics that it must be a weakness in human nature.

Go to creation.com and do a search for flat earth articles there and you can see for yourself how they deliberately ignore our points. I say “deliberate” because they would have to read what we stand for. If they haven’t, then that is another mistake. Perhaps they just remembered the words “flat earth” from grade school and NEVER once did research on the topic. Can creation.com and other sites like that be excused? I say “No.” Why? Because the know how to do research as their articles on defending Creationism is well done; they have studied the Evolutionist books and used their articles against them. So, these certain Christians are without excuse. No wonder so many people have left the church – people can learn more by reading the Bible (KJV 1611) on their own at home. The fact that you are reading this, tells me you are seeking the truth.

Copyright © 2015 Christianflatearthministry.wordpress.com

Posted in Bible and Flat Earth | Tagged | 1 Comment

Cult of Pythagoras

FLAT EARTH: In this video I explore how both Darwinian Evolution, and the Copernican heliocentric model, originated not from the application of the modern scientific method but instead from the ancient Mystery School traditions and pagan mysticism, specifically as evidenced through the figure of Pythagoras himself. In essence, heliocentric cosmology is an ancient satanic counterfeit to the true, Biblical, flat/enclosed Earth (just as Evolution is a Satanic counterfeit to God’s act of Creation…)

Posted in General Flat Earth Topics | Tagged | 2 Comments