Bible and Science, by Lady Blount, part 3

THE VERACITY OF THE BIBLE MAY BE TESTED BY ITS COSMOGONY

Let us therefore apply this test, and let us settle the question whether we shall have to write at the end of these pages, “The Romance of the Bible,” or “The Romance of Science.”

Of course all thoughtful Christians will be able to state assuredly that it will be the latter.

Having traced the origin of the whirling globe theory, let us now analyze its nature and its bearings by the dictates of Reason, governed by the unimpeachable claims of the Holy Scripture.

If we only allow our reason and observation to act apart from the prejudice of our early training there is not a single fact in all Nature which goes in opposition to the teaching of the Bible, but, on the contrary, all the practical experiments that have ever been made, go unmistakably to prove that the Bible is as scientifically accurate when it states that God “hath fixed the earth on its basis that it shall not be removed for ever,” as it is in setting forth the promise of Eternal Life and Re-Creation in the through our Lord, Jesus the Christ.

In connection with the Newtonian theory the first thing of which we are informed is that the Earth is a “planet,” and that it is one of a group of orbs which circle round the sun, and hence are called the “Solar System.” If a reason for such a conclusion is asked for, the only attempt ever made to satisfy the enquirer is entirely unsatisfactory and unenlightening. They tell us that as the sun, the moon, and the planets are globular, therefore the earth must be globular. But this is contrary to the teaching of the Bible, which states that the earth is “fixed” and that the heavenly bodies were made to give light to our earth, and to divide the light from the darkness, and to rule over the day and over the night. Also the true order of Creation is given in the Second Commandment, which states that Heaven is above, the Earth beneath, and the water under the Earth.

These statements from Holy Writ, which agree with the evidence of our God-given senses, and by which we behold the fact that the Bible account of Creation is true, precludes the possibility of our acceptance of the unscriptural and wildly romantic teaching presented to us by modern scientists.

It also seems that the “shadow of the earth upon the Moon” proof is on its last legs; and we hope ere long to see the open admission that the periodical lunar eclipse (even as it has been admitted regarding circular sailing) is “no proof of the earth’s globularity” printed in books for instructing the young. For at last our opponents are beginning to realize that the fact that the sun and the moon having been both seen above the horizon at the time when a lunar eclipse occurred, proves, even from their own standpoint, that it is not the shadow of the earth which causes the so-called eclipse of the moon, as the following diagram will show:

eclipse-1

If the sun and moon have ever been seen above the horizon at the same time during an eclipse of the moon, it is a proof that it is not the shadow of the earth which eclipses the moon. Let A be the earth and its horizon, and let B be the moon, and C the sun. Now it is evident that any shadow cast by A could not fall upon B but would fall upon D, because shadows always fall directly opposite the light, and as the light comes from C to A the shadow from A could not fall upon B but must be cast towards D. Therefore an eclipse of the moon under such conditions proves that the earth cannot be a globe.

We, planists, cannot for a moment admit that it is the shadow of the earth which is cast upon the moon, for we deny that the earth is a heavenly body. We may, or may not be able to say what this shadow is with certainty, but we are not above saying that “how” or “why” God darkens or eclipses the moon may be as “inexplicable a mystery to us as is the growth of a blade of grass.” Our Lord’s words regarding the Holy Spirit, when He said: we “cannot tell whence it cometh, or whither it goeth, and so is every one that is born of the Spirit,” should bring us to remember that God has not yet revealed unto us the “whys” and the “wherefores” of all things.

To proceed with our cursory glance at the nature of bearings of the Romance of Modern Science; regarding the earth’s supposed motions, we cannot enquire into the proofs of these motions for the simple reason that no real proofs are ever offered. We are required by our fellow mortals to believe, in contradiction to the evidence of our senses (under the penalty of being jeered at, and called cranks and “lunatics”) that the earth has a number of different motions, the two principal of which being its “axial” and “orbital” movements; and yet, not a single fact or proof is ever offered in support of such far-fetched and unreasonable suppositions save that which globe scientists terms “ the pendulum proof” which, though no proof at all, we must here discuss.

Posted in Bible and science | Tagged | Leave a comment

Bible and Science, by Lady Blount part 2

Who Invented the Idea of a Globe Earth?

(All grammar, spelling and punctuation is as the original. Our ancestors had a better command of the English language and had a nice style of writing, too.)

We endorse this statement; therefore let us trace the origin of this Scripture-contra “Science,” and let us analyze its nature and bearings.

42-17214683The origin of the Globular theory may be traced and shown to be Pagan. It was introduced into Egypt by the Greek Pythagoras, about 600 B.C. He was a native of Samos, and a great traveller in his early days. He travelled much in the East. And he imbibed the fallacious idea that the earth and sea together formed a whirling globe, and that the heavenly bodies were other worlds (inhabited). He also accepted the false doctrine of the transmigration of souls, from pagan magicians and Eastern inventors of romance and fiction.

Pythagoras returned to Europe, and introduced these serious errors into his own country; but after a time his party was dispersed, probably through dissent, and he left his native land. He went to Italy, where he met with a warm reception: and there, with a few followers, he collected many disciples and founded a college, and a sect which took the name of Pythagoreans. But ultimately an opposing division besieged and set fire to his College, and many of the Pythagorean students and disciples thus met with an untimely end. And whether Pythagoras escaped himself has never been ascertained.

But the mystical pagan doctrines which he had brought from the East were sown in the two European countries, Greece and Italy; and faith in these pagan fables became widely spread; until Ptolemy, who lived contemporaneously with the early Christians, so scouted and denounced these false ideas, that all belief in the earth’s motions, and the transmigration of souls was entirely abandoned for 1,400 years, i.e., until 1,500 A.D., when Copernicus revived the whirling globe theory.

But Copernicus’ followers were too hasty in publishing his writings – even before he was himself fully satisfied that the Pythagorean basis on which he had build his calculations rested on a solid foundation. It is stated that his misgivings, cause by dread of censure, were so great that they hastened, if not cause, his death. His most prominent works were published on the very day he died!

Kepler and Galileo took up the hypotheses, followed by one of the greatest, if not the greatest mathematician the world has ever produced – namely, Sir Isaac Newton.

However, the wisdom of the mortals is no standard measuring-rod of infallibility and Truth. Newton was no logician, and logic formed no part of his composition. Nor did he profess to possess this quality, which is absolutely essential to a discerner and founder of true Science.

Evidently Newton was deficient in this particular. For he spend his whole life in inventing and formulating an elaboration which he called the Solar System, buidling upon the mythical fallacies of Pythagoras had brought from the East in the first instance; and which had ben handed down by Copernicus, Kepler, and Galileo. Without testing the nature of his foundations he accepted the whole fabrication, and took Copernicus’ hypotheses all “for granted.”

But Kepler was his ideal fancy, or oracle of wisdom!

Thus we may clearly perceive the origin, and manner of establishment of the globular theory; and it is a fact that it is based upon pagan myths, and the nature of its foundations is purely hypothetical, as even Copernicus’ own confessions will testify.

He owned that the Pythagorean teaching was founded upon hypothesis, and that it was not “necessary that hypothesis should be true, or even probable.”

And again, that “the hypothesis of terrestrial motion was nothing but a hypothesis.” The supporters of modern astronomy either forget or ignore the self-condemning confessions of the founders of the globe theory, and they also close their eyes to its fabulous nature.

Of course it is highly probable that Copernicus knew where Pythagoras had learned this Arabian Nights-like story of the globe theory, and kindred fallacies, which were simply the outcome of the wildest and most ungodly imaginations of ungodly men. And it appears that, but too late, he two some extent realized that his writings were based merely upon falsehoods invented in the far east by mystically diseased heathen minds and practitioners of magic.

Continued veracity of the Bible may be tested by its cosmogony.

Posted in Bible and science | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Bible and science, by Lady Blount, part 1

Bible-kjvThe following is taken from an old flat earth booklet of an address by Lady Blount around the year 1898. I will post this in parts. Much wisdom can be had from the past – before the time of ‘political correctness’ and being afraid to offend those of another religion.

(All grammar, spelling and punctuation is as the original.)

TRUTH has a certain sound, divinely garnished,

But fiction ever is with falsehood tarnished.

The truth of the Religion of any people may be tested by its Cosmogony; and according to whatever it may be, the system of Religion associated with it must stand or fall.” Lord Macaulay (Lives of the Popes.)

Science is simply from the Latin word Scientia, which means Knowledge reduced to system under general facts or principles.

Fact we know is solid, and is the very essence of veracity. But Romance is not Truth. It is the very opposite to it; it is fiction.

Now we maintain that no system, however elaborated, can be placed on the high pedestal described as “Science” unless it be incontrovertibly based and founded upon Fact.

Therefore all things, whether they be methods, or systems, or mere calculations, without a true factor or foundation to start upon, are really only superficially erected upon hypothesis: and, being without true origin or foundation, we know are not only unproven in themselves, but, when such things are in contradiction to the Holy Scripture, they cannot be more graphically described than as the Scriptures describe them, viz.: “Science falsely so-called.”

And this so-called “science” is not true knowledge; it is opposite to Truth.

Nevertheless undivided truth is essential to every individual upon the face of the earth, and not merely a part of it; and so far we are bound in error we are held in bondage.

If we are thus bound unwittingly, or even unwillingly, we may not suffer condemnation. But in any case we shall suffer loss – and it may be great loss.

It is a disadvantage from an argumentative standpoint, when dealing with atheistic opponents to the Bible and its inspiration, if we are not equipped so as to be able to defend it from every possible point of view.

But alas! The world of children, in all sorts of schools, are taught to regard Modern Scripture contradicting “Science,” as far as the whirling globe theory is concerned, as infallible; while the Bible Cosmogony is set down as being very fallible! Frequently do I repeat this sad fact, but I desire to do so in the spirit of Phil. 3:1

Some men assert that they have “more evidence in favour of their so-called science than the teachings of Moses;” and infidels assume that “Moses can be shown to be caught red-handed in ignorance and error;” and they ask derisively: “What shall we think of the Christ who quoted and referred to Moses as an authority?”

But Jesus, the Christ, who stated when He was before His earthly judge, Pontius Pilate, that He had come froth from the Father, God, to bear witness to the truth, said: “Hay ye believed Moses, ye would have believed Me; for he wrote of Me. But if ye believe not his writings how shall ye believe my words?” John 5:46,47

Therefore, there can be no variation in replying to the question: What is Truth?

God’s Word is Truth, i.e., The Creator’s Word.

And Jesus Christ is the embodiment of that Word.

“And the Word was made flesh.”

It is an unimpeachable fact that the Bible is as scientifically accurate in its description of Creation, as it is in setting forth Redemption in and through our dear Redeemer.

A well known infidel has said that “Christians are fools, because they place their faith in the Bible in some things while they own it to be fallacious in others. For instance, they accept its offer of “salvation,” and rest upon its promises on these lines; but at the same time they accept the teaching of man with regard to Modern Science, as being more reliable than the Bible, which it flatly contradicts as to the facts of Creation.

Next Post we’ll look at the origin of the Scripture-contradicting “Science.”

Posted in Bible and science | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Another Comment on Flat Earth Society

As an example of how the Flat Earth Society controls opposition, just look at this Vice.com interview with them and see how the misinfo psy-op works:

Yes, There are Still People Who Believe the Earth is Flat

For example, see the answer given for seeing different stars in different places on Earth:

“We all know some stars are visible from the Southern Hemisphere and not from the Northern Hemisphere, but the reason behind that is electromagnetic and optical acceleration through an aetheric whirlpool. We believe in cosmic speed, but in an esoteric sense.”

What the hell are they talking about!? “Electromagnetic and optical acceleration through an aetheric whirlpool? Esoteric cosmic speed sense?” It’s purposeful, pointless word salad to discredit the flat Earth message. The real reason, as given by the man whose work they’re claiming to represent, is as follows:

“What can be more common than the observation that, standing at one end of a long row of lamp-posts, those nearest to us seem to be the highest; and those farthest away the lowest; whilst, as we move along towards the opposite end of the series, those which we approach seem to get higher, and those we are leaving behind appear to gradually become lower … It is an ordinary effect of perspective for an object to appear lower and lower as the observer goes farther and farther away from it. Let any one try the experiment of looking at a light-house, church spire, monument, gas lamp, or other elevated object, from a distance of only a few yards, and notice the angle at which it is observed. On going farther away, the angle under which it is seen will diminish, and the object will appear lower and lower as the distance of the observer increases, until, at a certain point, the line of sight to the object, and the apparently uprising surface of the earth upon or over which it stands, will converge to the angle which constitutes the ‘vanishing point’ or the horizon; beyond which it will be invisible.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (230-1)

The horizon is not the end of the heavens, it is merely the vanishing point of your perspective, so different stars are visible and appear at different inclinations wherever you are in the world. In fact, the range at which people all over the Earth are able to see the same stars does not fit with the globular model. For instance, Ursa Major, very close to Polaris, can be seen from 90 degrees North latitude (the North Pole) all the way down to 30 degrees South latitude. The constellation Vulpecula can be seen from 90 degrees North latitude, all the way to 55 degrees South latitude. Taurus, Pisces and Leo can be seen from 90 degrees North all the way to 65 degrees South. Aquarius and Libra can be seen from 65 degrees North to 90 degrees South! The constellation Virgo is visible from 80 degrees North down to 80 degrees South, and Orion can be seen from 85 degrees North all the way to 75 degrees South latitude! An observer on a ball-Earth, regardless of any tilt or inclination, should not logically be able to see this far.

“Another thing is certain, that from within the equator the north pole star, and the constellations Ursa Major, Ursa Minor, and many others, can be seen from every meridian simultaneously; whereas in the south, from the equator, neither the so-called south pole star, nor the remarkable constellation of the Southern Cross, can be seen simultaneously from every meridian, showing that all the constellations of the south – pole star included – sweep over a great southern arc and across the meridian, from their rise in the evening to their setting in the morning. But if the earth is a globe, Sigma Octantis, a south pole star, and the Southern Cross, a southern circumpolar constellation, they would all be visible at the same time from every longitude on the same latitude, as is the case with the northern pole star and the northern circumpolar constellations. Such, however, is not the case.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (286)

Posted in Flat Earth Society | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Flat Earth Society Is Controlled Opposition!

Flat-earth-society

For those who have done research on the Flat Earth Society and found their website, you may have walked away thinking, “These people are not serious!” or other such thoughts. Well, you are right, as they are the controlled opposition.

The Flat Earth Society is a controlled opposition group that mixes truth with lies and satire to discredit genuine flat Earth research, a job they have been doing for a long time now. Founded in 1970 by Leo Ferrari, a suspected Freemason and philosophy professor at St. Thomas’ University, Leo spent his life making a mockery of the legitimate subject of our flat Earth. Though he passed away in 2010, his Flat Earth Society still exists today online as a website/forum which, still true to form, purports several false flat-Earth arguments and treats the entire subject as a dead-pan joke.

flat-earth-society-3In 1956 a genuine truth-seeker and flat-Earth researcher, Samuel Shenton, had started the IFERS (International Flat Earth Research Society) and was making quite an impact with his publications and interviews, revealing the truth of our flat Earth to the masses. The globalists attempted to ignore the threat posed by Shenton for over a decade before finally creating their competing, farcical controlled opposition FES (Flat Earth Society) which has spent the past 45 years steering all flat-Earth inquiry into the realms of satire and sarcasm.

To give an idea of how the controlled opposition works, consider the example of Leo Ferrari’s pumpkin-sized rock he would always take during interviews and lectures claiming he brought the stone back from the edge of our flat Earth! He would say, with a huge smirk on his face, how his boat had fallen over the edge but he was luckily saved by hanging onto this rock. Clearly, treating our flat Earth in this tongue-in-cheek way discouraged people from taking the matter seriously.

Ferrari’s entire schtick involved approaching the flat Earth subject from every angle EXCEPT the rational and scientific. For example, he published a series of articles including “The Global Fallacy as a Cause of Racial Prejudice,” arguing that people in countries at the top of the globe felt superior to those at the bottom, when in fact there was no top or bottom to the world, so, “even if one assumed that the world was spherical, the ‘top’ and ‘bottom’ have been arbitrarily selected, resulting in racial discrimination against those in the south. How can the globularists, their hirelings and dupes, seriously claim to believe that all men are created equal when they teach that some men are eternally fated to hang like bats from the bottom of a globe on which other men stand upright? The only solution is a flat Earth!” So instead of presenting measurements or experiments, instead of presenting any proofs or evidence, Ferrari would often simply argue the flat Earth as a serendipitous satirical solution to social problems.

In a famous 1971 CBC interview Ferrari was asked, “how do you explain the fact that the Earth appears round in the pictures taken from space by the astronauts?” Instead of answering and addressing the clear photo-trickery involved, Ferrari replied, “Simple. No doubt you’re familiar with Einstein’s theory of the curvature of space. If space is curved – and modern physics is based on that assumption – the Earth, from space, would appear circular. It’s a simple optical illusion.” This convoluted, pandering answer really is no answer at all and serves only to make the listener cock their head and raise an eyebrow.

Around this time, Charles K. Johnson, another genuine flat-Earther, took over the IFERS from the recently deceased Shenton. He and his wife Marjory, along with being flat-Earthers, were also vegetarians and anti-vivisectionist activists who campaigned for better treatment of our animal friends. In 1974, when Johnson heard of Ferrari’s budding organization, he decided to contact him and wrote a cordial letter requesting further information about his society, to which Ferrari never replied. Two years later Johnson wrote another polite letter saying, how he was “delighted by the prospect of a like-minded campaigner,” and said how it was “a very happy day” when he learned of Ferrari’s society. “I feel sure at the core we can’t be too far apart in aims,” Johnson wrote, “I do try to practice what I preach, to think and seek and search out reasonable ideas and concepts.” He closed saying that “he could hardly wait” to hear from Ferrari and hoped very much he would please reply. After six months without a response, Johnson wrote one more time, explaining again his sole purpose to “enlarge his view” and “getting and holding onto the facts,” which would benefit himself, and in time, the rest of the world. He requested a reply and a copy of Ferrari’s FES magazine. In conclusion Johnson signed “thanks from the bottom of my heart,” in advance, but warned that if Ferrari insisted on ignoring him once again, “I will then know for sure you are some kind of enemy of the Flat Earth work.” Eventually Ferrari did reply this time, but not with a message or magazine as requested, he simply enclosed a FES paid-application form.

Johnson investigated Ferrari’s organization further and found that he was using “the flat earth idea as a gimmick to entertain and promote the atheistic society.” From then on, Johnson worked hard to expand his IFERS and constantly for the rest of his life exposed Ferrari’s FES, calling him a “false prophet guilty of muddying the waters of truth.” Near the end of his life, tragically Johnson’s house burned down along with all the flat Earth materials he and Shenton had collected over their lifetimes. Until his dying day, Johnson claimed the fire to be the result of arson by a NASA agent he had seen snooping around.

Nowadays the IFERS has disappeared and only Ferrari’s FES exists as a website and message board maintained by moderators who, following in the footsteps of Ferrari, make a mockery of the whole thing and turn every thread into a joke deterring any serious flat Earth researcher from pursuing further. The only redeeming aspect of their website is the library of other people’s flat Earth material they maintain, which is actually quite good. The current President, Daniel Shenton, (coincidentally NO relation to the genuine flat-Earther and IFERS founder Samuel Shenton) can be heard in the following clip, still “muddying the waters of truth,” with several false flat Earth arguments (in the previous Post):

Notice he says he is “not sure about the Sun, Moon and planets, but that they’re probably spheres, but it’s definitely not proven, I think.” He flip-flops his answers and expertly fumbles his words as if intentionally trying to sound scatter-brained. Compare and contrast this shill with genuine flat Earth researchers like myself who will tell you unequivocally that the Sun, Moon, stars and “planets” are all merely luminaries, round discs of celestial light, NOT spherical terra firma capable of landing on as the Freemasons at NASA would have you believe. He then goes on saying “the effects of gravity, I feel, could be simulated by the disc Earth moving upwards, accelerating upwards at 9.8 meters per second, would have the same effects of what people traditionally think of as gravity.” This ridiculous false flat-Earth argument also appears on Wikipedia and the FES homepage. It is provably wrong as the “upwards accelerating disc” would smash into all helicopters, planes and hot-air balloons making sustained flight of any kind impossible, but they purposely promote these straw-man arguments so flat Earth neophytes will rightly laugh off their dumb explanations, and then following suit, write off the entire subject.

To combat Ferrari’s Flat Earth Society controlled opposition forum, and in memory of Samuel Shenton, Charles Johnson, and other true flat Earth researchers of the past I have now started this website – that you are now on ( ChristianFlatEarthMinistry.org ). Also, I have a chat room at: cfeministries.freeforums.net Soon, I’ll be having a newsletter to keep everyone up to date. If you can make a financial support, this would be much appreciated, too.

Posted in Flat Earth Society | Tagged | Leave a comment

Flat earth society interview with Daniel Shenton

Those who are in the leadership position of the Society today deliberately discredit the flat earth. Listen to Mr Shenton talk. He murky’s the water of flat earth believers as he says that the earth is constantly moving upward (which causes things to fall down). What makes things fall down is NOT gravity and it’s not an ‘elevator effect’ but rather that mass has weight and anything heavier than air falls. It’s as simple as that. He also said that he is not sure of the sun and moon but they are probably spheres.

In a future Post I’ll write about those who are in the FES and what they are doing is actually helping maintain the globe earth belief.

Posted in Flat Earth Society | Tagged | Leave a comment

How to Make a Globe Earth in Photoshop

photoshop-1

Craig-3

How to full the public by making a globe earth in Photoshop

You’ve all seen those nice, perfectly round globe earth with the deep blue ocean water that we’re told is earth. If want to know how they (NASA and company) makes it, keep reading. If you have Photoshop, you might want to try this.

Easy Photoshop Tips and Tricks

Have you ever wanted to easily create the image of Earth and dread using the circle tool? There is an easy way to design the world in six steps, and on the seventh step you rest (just a little joke). First, you should select File/New from the menu bar and create a file size that measures about 200 pixels by 200 pixels. The RGB mode should be selected for this trick. Next, choose a light blue shade for the foreground color and a darker blue for the background color.

Under the Filters tab, select Render, and then choose Clouds. Here, you can actually create clouds. But keep in mind these ‘clouds’ will not change. However, you’ll still fool most of the public. The scene that will greet you should look a lot like the sky. It is the clouds filter that utilizes the foreground and background colors needed to construct this image in your file. If you desire a different look, you can press Ctrl + F on Windows or Command + F for a Mac to reapply the filter. Each time this key combination is pressed, you will receive a somewhat different outcome.

Now, return to the Filter menu and select Render, and then choose Lighting Effects. Once you enter the Light Effects menu, you are able to alter the shape of the ellipse to a circle that becomes centered on your file. Changing the Narrow setting to 39 next follows choosing the Default Spotlight setting.

Sometimes a Photoshop project calls for texture. There are thousands of backgrounds to create that range from a grainy composition to a multi-faceted mess (depending on the look you are going for). To create a paper texture in Photoshop, you should start a new file that measures 60 x 60 pixels. The color should be in RGB. Next, select the following commands in this same order: Filter, Noise, Add Noise. Once completed, choose Gaussian, which is set to 80%.

The next step to create a paper texture is to select Filter, then Stylize, followed by Emboss. The angle should be set to -50, the Height to 2 pixels, and the Amount to 70%. The background will now resemble a gray embossed selection. To change the color, choose Image, then Adjust, followed by Hue-Saturation-Brightness. Once you select the Colorize check box, you should set the Hue to a different setting. To gain your personal preference, you can adjust the contrast.

To create the appearance that objects are glowing without using any filters, choose an object to work with that will be duplicated as a layer. First, select the color you’d like your glow to be. After choosing the lower duplicate, click on Edit from the menu, then Stroke. When the Stroke Options appear, the pixel width should be set between 1 and 16. It is important to remember that the larger number you choose, the thicker the glow will appear.

Before exiting, you should glance under Location to make sure that the Outside option is selected. The next step involves applying a Gaussian Blur to the layer, which can be found under the Blur option in Filters. This will soften the glow applied to the layer. Some individuals even repeat the process to create a double glow, which is some cases, can really make an image stand out.

Wahla! You have a globe earth. This is proof that we live on a sphere – and it’s backed up by the technology of Photoshop! What’s all this talk about a flat earth?

As a side note, Photoshop can make a flat earth, too!

Posted in Planets | Tagged | Leave a comment

Responding to Critics

Sometimes it’s not worth responding to Critics. I got a few on this website and I just delete their comments. I don’t do this all the time, mind you, but it is done. The reason why is, that these people are probably govt shills and if they are not, they might as well write to the feds and they can pay them for spamming lies.

When someone comes on this website and says that God is not good, or that the earth is indeed a globe, they are wasting my time and they have no intention on learning the truth. They like the LIE and want to stay with it. How do I know? If they are really seeking the truth, there is a ton of information here; there are hours and hours of videos to watch that are posted here. So, I don’t want to hear that the earth is speeding around the sun at 67,000mph. It’s OK for people who come here and believe in the globe earth but before they shoot their mouth off, do a little reading, watch some flat earth videos, THEN make a comment for something you don’t understand.

You see, these dishonest critics would love nothing more than for me (or for you) to spend my time writing each and everyone back. They aren’t going to read it – so why should I waste my time. I’ll let them waste their time to write their anti-Christ remarks. I can read faster than they can type then all I have to do is hit the ‘trash’ icon and be done with it 🙂

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 3 Comments

Supposed Curvature of Earth Never Factored In, Part 3

canal so-called curvature of earth“If the earth be the globe of popular belief, it is very evident that in cutting a canal, an allowance must be made for the curvature of the globe, which allowance would correspond to the square of the distance multiplied by eight inches. From The Age, of 5th August 1892, I extract the following: ‘The German Emperor performed the ceremony of opening the Gates of the Baltic and North Sea Canal, in the spring of 1891. The canal starts at Holtenau, on the south side of Kiel Bay, and joins the Elbe 15 miles above its mouth. It is 61 miles long, 200 feet wide at the surface and 85 feet at the bottom, the depth being 28 feet. No locks are required, as the surface of the two seas is level.’ Let those who believe it is the practice for surveyors to make allowance for ‘curvature’ ponder over the following from the Manchester Ship Canal Company (Earth Review, October, 1893) ‘It is customary in Railway and Canal constructions for all levels to be referred to a datum which is nominally horizontal and is so shown on all sections. It is not the practice in laying out Public Works to make allowances for the curvature of the earth.” –Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (23)

The London and Northwestern Railway forms a straight line 180 miles long between London and Liverpool. The railroad’s highest point, midway at Birmingham station, is only 240 feet above sea-level. If the world were actually a globe, however, curveting 8 inches per mile squared, the 180 mile stretch of rail would form an arc with the center point at Birmingham raising a full 5,400 feet above London and Liverpool. Adding the station’s actual height (240 feet) to its theoretical inclination (5,400 feet) gives 5,640 feet as the rail’s necessary height on a globe-Earth, more than a thousand feet taller than Ben Nevis, the tallest mountain in Great Britain!

“In projecting railways on a globe, the datum line would be the arc of a circle corresponding to the latitude of the place. That the datum line for the railway projections is always a horizontal line, proves that the general configuration of the world is horizontal. To support the globe theory, the gentlemen of the observatories should call upon the surveyor to prove that he allows the necessary amount for ‘curvature.’ But this is what the learned men dare not do, as it is well-known that the allowance for the supposed curvature is never made.” –Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (107)

“In a long line, like that of the Great Pacific Railway, extending across North America, the supposed curvature would, of course, be proportionately great, extending to many miles in height, but not one inch was allowed by the engineers for curvature during the whole course of the construction of that vast line of Railway. And, if we think of it, how could it be otherwise? All Railway metals must, of necessity, be straight, for how could any engine or carriage run with safety on a convex surface?” -David Wardlaw Scott, “Terra Firma” (125)

J.C. Bourne in his book, “The History of the Great Western Railway” stated that the entire original English railroad, more than 118 miles long, that the whole line with the exception of the inclined planes, may be regarded practically as level. The British Parliament Session in 1862 that approved its construction recorded in Order No. 44 for the proposed railway, “That the section be drawn to the same HORIZONTAL scale as the plan, and to a vertical scale of not less than one inch to every one hundred feet, and shall show the surface of the ground marked on the plan, the intended level of the proposed work, the height of every embankment, and the depth of every cutting, and a DATUM HORIZONTAL LINE which shall be the same throughout the whole length of the work.”

“One hundred and eighteen miles of LEVEL railway, and yet the surface on which it is projected a globe? Impossible. It cannot be. Early in 1898 I met Mr. Hughes, chief officer of the steamer ‘City of Lincoln.’ This gentleman told me he had projected thousands of miles of level railway in South America, and never heard of any allowance for curvature being made. On one occasion he surveyed over one thousand miles of railway which was a perfect straight line all the way. It is well known that in the Argentine Republic and other parts of South America, there are railways thousands of miles long without curve or gradient. In projecting railways, the world is acknowledged to be a plane, and if it were a globe the rules of projection have yet to be discovered. Level railways prove a level world, to the utter confusion of the globular school of impractical men with high salaries and little brains.” –Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (109)

“That in all surveys no allowance is made for curvature, which would be a necessity on a globe; that a horizontal line is in every case the datum line, the same line being continuous throughout the whole length of the work; and that the theodolite cuts a line at equal altitudes on either side of it, which altitude is the same as that of the instrument, clearly proves, to those who will accept proof when it is furnished, that the world is a plane and not a globe.” –Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (126)

Posted in Flat Earth Experiments | Tagged | Leave a comment

Supposed Curvature of Earth Never Factored In, Part 2

 

The Suez Canal: no curvature factored in when building.

The Suez Canal: no curvature factored in when building.

The Suez Canal which connects the Mediterranean Sea with the Gulf of Suez on the Red Sea is a clear proof of the Earth’s and water’s non-convexity. The canal is 100 miles long and without any locks so the water within is an uninterrupted continuation of the Mediterranean Sea to the Red Sea. When it was constructed, the Earth’s supposed curvature was not taken into account, it was dug along a horizontal datum line 26 feet below sea-level, passing through several lakes from one sea to the other, with the datum line and the water’s surface running perfectly parallel over the 100 miles. The average level of the Mediterranean is 6 inches above the Red Sea, while the floodtides in the Red Sea rise 4 feet above the highest and drop 3 feet below the lowest in the Mediterranean, making the half-tide level of the Red Sea, the surface of the Mediterranean Sea, and the 100 miles of water in the canal, all a clear continuation of the same horizontal line! Were they instead the supposed curved line of globe-Earthers, the water in the center of the canal would be 1666 feet (502 x 8 inches = 1666 feet 8 inches) above the respective Seas on either side!

“The distance between the Red Sea at Suez and the Mediterranean Sea is 100 statute miles, the datum line of the Canal being 26 feet below the level of the Mediterranean, and is continued horizontally the whole way from sea to sea, there not being a single lock on the Canal, the surface of the water being parallel with the datum line. It is thus clear that there is no curvature or globularity for the whole hundred miles between the Mediterranean and the Red Sea; had there been, according to the Astronomic theory, the middle of the Canal would have been 1,666 feet higher than at either end, whereas the Canal is perfectly horizontal for the whole distance. The Great Canal of China, said to be 700 miles in length, was made without regard to any allowance for supposed curvature, as the Chinese believe the Earth to be a Stationary Plane. I may also add that no allowance was made for it in the North Sea Canal, or in the Manchester Ship Canal, both recently constructed, thus clearly proving that there is no globularity in Earth or Sea, so that the world cannot possibly be a Planet.” –David Wardlaw Scott, “Terra Firma” (134)

Posted in Flat Earth Experiments | Tagged | Leave a comment