Question: How do you explain Time zones, Different Seasons, Changing Star constellations, Gravity and the Tides?
Answer: This video addresses all of these questions and far more in a response video to Zachary K. Hubbard’s questions.
Calla Cofield
SPACE.com
We are told that scientists believe there could be ‘planet 9’ just found. Again, this is another created news story to keep the money coming in.
In the Yahoo News article I found there is a picture of the satellite, Cassini near Enceladus, which is ‘a moon of Saturn.’ The caption under the picture is: Cassini at Enceladus
There is no mention at all in the article that this is a Photoshop type picture. Not only is it a computer generated picture but it’s one that is highly imaginative; they don’t even try to be real! Think about it, how can two planets be so close to each other and one not collied into the other? Even the astronomers will see the absurdity of this picture (two planets very close to each other) . So, how can this small body get so close to a largeer one and not be completely drawn in and thus crash?
See what other fake features you see in the picture.
I looked up Enceladus in Wikipedia and it says that the surface is -350 F (or there about). How can any man-made object, such as Cassini, operate? The whole satellite would be brittle and cease to function.
Later in this article we are told of how, ‘“It captures breathtaking images of Saturn, makes death-defying dives toward its moons and measures the precise location of Saturn at various times during its orbits around the sun.”
It sounds like James Bond driving in his car on wild street chase!
Clear pictures sent back to earth
Think about that for a minute – how can a satellite that is billions of miles away from us send us beautiful clear pictures and other data to us? Heck, look at the poor quality we get from a Skype call when we are only 100 miles away! Not to criticise Skype, but the fact is, we know how communication is here despite all the technology we have. We have: cable, microwave towers and other relay devices. Yet, we are to believe that something that is billions of miles away can generate a signal, send it through space, through the extreme heat and cold, with no relay towers to boost the signal, and be received here showing, among other things, a clear picture of whatever it takes? Nonsense!
Just think of this when you talk to someone about the flat earth and they come back with an objection about pictures sent by satellites billions of miles away. Just tell them, in a kind, understanding tone, about the impossibility of this happening. Usually, if they are think at all on the subject they’ll realise the truth. Of course, they could be in denial so they don’t have to deal with it. But otherwise, I’m sure you see of the impossibility of sending signals from space.
Globe earthers will often quip that ‘if the earth were flat, then we could see all over it!’ but this is, of course, ignorant and inaccurate. If you stand on the beach, a plain or prairie, you will find the horizon extends about three to six miles around you – depending on the weather and your eyesight. The range of the human eye, our field of vision is from 110 to 1 degree, and the smallest angle under which an object can still be seen is 1/60 of 1 degree, so that when an object is 3000 times its own diameter away from an observer, it will cease to be visible. So, for example, the farthest distance at which one can see a 1 inch diameter penny, is 3000 inches, or 250 feet. Therefore, if a ship’s hull is 10 feet above the water, it will disappear from the unaided eye at 3,000 times 10 feet, or 6 miles. This has nothing to do with the supposed ‘convexity’ or ‘curvature’ of the earth and everything to do with the common Law of Perspective.
The horizon of an observer is distant or near according to the greatness or otherwise of his elevation above the surface of the supposed globe. If he stands 24 feet above sea level, he is said to be in the centre of a circle, which bounds his vision, the radius of which in any direction, on a clear day, is six miles. A local gentleman tells me that he has watched a boat-race in New Zealand, seeing the boats all the way out and home, the distance being 9 miles from where he was standing on the beach. I have seen the hull of a steamer with the naked eye at an elevation of not more than 24 feet, as a distance of 12 miles, and in taking observations along the South African coast, have sometimes had an horizon of at least 20 miles at an elevation of 20 feet only.
The distance of the horizon, or vanishing point, where the sky appears to touch the earth and sea, is determined, largely by the weather, and when that is clear, by the power of our visioin. This is proved by the fact that the telescope will increase the distance of the horizon very greatly, and bring objects into view which are entirely beyond the range of vision of the unaided eye. But, as no telescope can pierce a segment of water, the legitimate conclusion we are forced to arrive at, is that the surface of water is level, and that, therefore, the shape of the world cannot be globular, and on such a flat or level surface, the greater the elevation of the observer, the longer will his range of vision be, and thus the father he can see. Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny
On the shore near Waterloo, a few miles to the north of Liverpool, a good telescope was fixed, at an elevation of 6 feet above the water. It was directed to a large seamer, just leaving the River Mersey, and sailing out to Dublin.
Gradually the mast-head of the receding vessel came nearer to the horizon, until, at length, after more than four hours had elapsed, it disappeared. The ordinary rate of sailing of the Dublin steamers was fully eight miles an hour; so that the vessel would be, at least, thirty-two miles distant when the mast-head came to the horizon. This 6 feet of elevation of the telescope would require three miles to be deducted for convexity, which would leave 29 miles, the square of which, multiplied by 8 inches, gives 560 feet; deducting 80 feet for the height of the main-mast, and we find that, according to the doctrine of rotundity, the mast-head of the outward bound steamer should have been 480 feet below the horizon.
Many other experiments of this kind have been made upon sea-going steamers, and always with results entirely incompatible with the theory that the earth is a globe. Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, ‘Zetetic Astronomy, Earht Not a Globe!’
Here is a video for your consideration. Since the earth is flat, there has to be more land in the extreme south of earth (Antarctica). Here is a video for your consideration. Notice that this land is free of ice and snow except in the higher elevations. So, where would it be this warm when all around is snow 12 months of the year?
We know that there is more ocean in the southern hemisphere but you can’t photograph that and say, “Here is new ocean!” It doesn’t make sense but with land you can do this. What you can do with the ocean – to prove that there is more – is to sail in a ship. For example, we are given the distance between the southern continents, so, if you have a sea-worthy yacht, see if the journey takes longer than what it should. If you find out that it does, it tells us that the earth is much larger than what it is. If you are rich and have your own jet, fly the distance from New Zealand to South America – directly. But before you do, you better have plans to be sure you can land on some island on the way. The reason for this is, that if you gage the fuel with what you are told the distance is, you’ll come up, perhaps, thousands of miles short.
Do you know that some people want the name of the moon changed? This is news I found today (Feb. 27) on the internet. Some people claim that the name of the moon is so common that they want a name change; changed to something ‘cool’ like the name of the moons of other planets. It goes on to say that calling the moon, moon, is like have the name of your dog, dog, or a person, person.
Now, these people are not Christian or they don’t know their Bible. First, who created everything? God did. So, he gets to name what we live on today. He called it Earth. The great light, he called, the Sun, and what we see at night that shines light, is called the Moon.
But have you noticed that all the other planets, including many stars have names that come from pagan religions? All the ‘planets in our solar system’ have names of Roman deities. Since much of society have a non-Christian slant or are controlled by non-Christians, it only makes sense that these modern-day pagans would want to change the name of the moon. What is next?
I would not be surprised that these very same people will want to change the name of the Sun. After all, this is a ‘common’ name, too; all stars are really suns, so let’s call it something ‘cool’!
God name the sun, the Sun; the same with our ‘planet’ he called Earth. After all, Adam was not around to name things – which he did in the Garden. As pagan thinking goes, why not change the names of what God called things?
I did a search in the Bible (KJV) to find the verses that have the word ‘moon’ in it and there are over 50 verses. Some of them are below…
Gen_37:9 And he dreamed yet another dream, and told it his brethren, and said, Behold, I have dreamed a dream more; and, behold, the sun and the moon and the eleven stars made obeisance to me.
Deu_4:19 And lest thou lift up thine eyes unto heaven, and when thou seest the sun, and the moon, and the stars, even all the host of heaven, shouldest be driven to worship them, and serve them, which the LORD thy God hath divided unto all nations under the whole heaven.
Deu_17:3 And hath gone and served other gods, and worshipped them, either the sun, or moon, or any of the host of heaven, which I have not commanded;
Deu_33:14 And for the precious fruits brought forth by the sun, and for the precious things put forth by the moon,
Jos_10:12 Then spake Joshua to the LORD in the day when the LORD delivered up the Amorites before the children of Israel, and he said in the sight of Israel, Sun, stand thou still upon Gibeon; and thou, Moon, in the valley of Ajalon.
Jos_10:13 And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is not this written in the book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day.
In Genesis God called the moon ‘the lesser light’ but you can be sure that the name came from him.
(Gen 1:16) And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.
(Gen 1:17) And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,
(Gen 1:18) And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.
(Gen 1:19) And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.
I don’t know why centuries ago, when Christianity was just starting, that other names were not given to the planets in stead of these stupid pagan deity names. Of course, as flat earthers, we know that there is no ‘solar system’ as such, and that there are no planets, as such, either. What we call planets are nothing more than lights but they move more and they appear closer to the earth.
If you notice in the book of Joshua, in the verses above, we read that the Moon did not move and the Sun did not move during the great battle that took place back then. This plainly tells us that it is the moon and sun that does the moving and not the Earth. And, by implication, that they have to be relatively close to the Earth and that the they are much smaller in size than what they are.
Let’s keep calling the Earth, Sun and Moon by their proper names and not something else.
With the flat earth model, there should be more land discovered – as well as more ocean. Knowing the flat earth model, you know that the distance between the southern contents are much further apart. You also know that the Antarctica has much more cost land, which, implies, more land.
So, is there more land, and how does it look like?
In the near future post, I will present some photos of this land. Yes, real photos and it’s different than what you would expect. Would you like to take a journey with me to find the Truth? Then, come along (watch this website) and find out more of this great Earth we live on.
Your Donations make this research possible.
Here is a picture of Australia from ‘space’ and it shows city lights in the dessert! What really happened is someone who doctored the pictures didn’t realise that this section of Australia has no cities or towns of any size.
s
One of the ways to get the flat earth truth out is by being on Twitter. Now, I’m not a fan of social media sites but since millions of people are on it, this is where I thought I have to be for our young people to see the truth.
I just started this site. So, if you like, follow me and get the latest news on flat earth and other interesting subjects.
Click Here to go to my Twitter page.
Previously, I posted a picture of clouds behind the sun. In this Post is a picture of clouds behind the moon. This tells you, this is proof, that the moon is much closer than we are told (the same goes for the sun). In other words, how can clouds be more than a quarter of a million miles away and outside of our atmosphere? How can clouds be 93 million miles away? It can’t, which means that the moon and sun is under the firmament. (Check out the word ‘firmament’ as found in the Bible.)
There are attempts by the government to delete flat earth vidoes and articles; (see video posted here). Anything that uncovers the truth, the governments of the world want to cover up. So, how do we fight back?
There are several things you can do, of which I’ll list here. I’m not claiming its a acomplete list but one that covers the main areas.
If you post on YouTube, your chance of having the video banned would be greater. But there is an alternative site you can go to and that is http://Vimeo.com You can have a free account or you can have a paid accout. With a paid account you have more storeage space and control over what you do. Though this is not guarantee, you will be better off.
Your next step IF you make your own videos is to have it hosted on your own paid hosting account. Then upload it directly to that.
Most of you will not make your own flat earth videos, so how do you presever the other videos?
There are free software you can get where you can download any YouTube video (or those by other video hosting sites). Then, IF the videos are deleted on the internet, you at least have your own copy on your computer.
Once you have done this, you can burn a DVD or you can copy it to a flash drive. When you do this, you can share it with others. Thus, the flat earth information can still get out.
With flat earth articles, just copy-and-paste the videos and save them on your computer. You can then share them with others by sending email attachments to them. Of course, you can put them on the internet, too. The more that is out there, the harder it is for the control freaks to get them all.
For your video downloader, here are two links:
Videograbby.com
Youtubedownloader.com
If you are into making your own videos, you can dothis in several ways:
Your built in webcam
Google Hangouts
Screencast-o-matic
I have used YouTubedownloader, my web cam, Hangouts, and the software – screencast-o-matic.
With screencast-o-matic you can do some special featers that others can’t. With Google Hangouts, you can have a group of up to 10 people listen to what you say. This can be saved on your hard drive as well as uploaded to YouTube.
I hope this helps you out.
Christian Flat Earth Ministry 