More on The Three Pole Trick

Posted on May 20, 2016 by revealed4you

3-Pole-trick-article-2A

If you have read the previous post on The Three Pole Trick, you will know what I’m about to say. If you haven’t read it, I would suggest you do – to get a better understanding of this article.

In light of our technology here is an easy experiment to demonstrate to others if there is a curve to the earth or not. Go to an area of the country where there is a flat land, such as the beach. Say, you live in Kansas – which is a flat state. Set up three poles of equal height spaced a mile apart along the road. Do this when it’s dark or nearly so. Stand with a laser pointing across the tops of the poles. Have another person standing a mile or two way – off at right angles to the flags and have binoculars or a small power telescope to look at the light. If everything is lined up, you’ll see the line of the laser straight as an arrow across the poles. No pole will be higher than the other. As we know a laser beam is straight, and it’s something you can see at night. Get a photograph of this and write down the details.

If the earth is a globe, there would be the laser light 8 inches higher than pole B and 32 inches (2 feet 8 inches) higher than pole C.

While you are at it, if you start the experiment during the day, you can take a picture through the telescope at pole B and C, and you’ll see right to the very ground. This would be impossible on a globe, as at 2 miles you would not be able to see 2 feet inches of the bottom of the pole.

Another simple thing to do is, look at the laser light along the two miles and see if it’s parallel to the ground. Of course, you will just have to eye it, but you should be able to notice a difference of over two feet. If you can get to a site that covers a wider area and if you have a powerful enough laser, you can make the test over a longer area. In other words, IF the earth is a globe, the laser light will be at a higher elevation on the far end.

Posted in Flat Earth Experiments | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Three Poles Trick: A Canal Experiment

Posted on May 20, 2016 by revealed4you

Published in The Earth

Vol. III Nos. 33 & 34 April and May

3-poles-2

Note: This is from a booklet that was written around the turn of the 20th Century. The grammar, spelling and style is kept the same. To a few readers out there: if you think a word doesn’t exist, look it up in an old dictionary.

Trickery has long been involved in covering up the flat earth – it didn’t start with modern space agencies like NASA, it’s that they have just refined how to fool the people.

The Three Poles Trick: A Canal Experiment

As the very foundation of modern astronomy rests on the assumption that we are living on a whirling globe, all sorts of devices are resorted to to support the idea of the earth’s sphericity.

After having demolished some of the best “proofs” it is surely not necessary to examine and review every statement offered in support of this modern and absurd fallacy. But we will briefly refer to one or two others before going on to examine the question of the Earth’s supposed motions.

We are informed that the Earth’s curvature could be “proved” by three poles placed in a straight line; and such an experiment was tried in a noted instance upon the Bedford Canal, Cambridgeshire. Our examination of this “proof” may thrown some light upon the “trick” which was then supposed to win a wager.

We shall, however, quote again from Mr. Gregory’s book, published in 1892, p. 110.

“If three poles of exactly the same height be placed in a line the middle one always appears higher than the other two outer ones. Let three poles be fixed in line with their tops cut off at exactly the same height above some level surface (level mind you!), such as the surface of a canal, then, if a telescope is sighted along the first to the third pole the top of the middle pole will appear above the line joining the tops of the two outer ones. The cause of this is the curvature of the earth’s surface, and if the experiment can be repeated (why cannot it?) in various parts of the Earth, and (“if”) it was found that the curvature was everywhere the same, this would prove that the Earth’s form is globular, and an approximate determination of its size could be obtained. It is found that the middle pole rises 8 inches above the line joining the two out when the distance between each pole is a mile.”

This is a very specious paragraph. It reads well, and an unsuspecting reader might easily be misled by it. But let us examine it a little, and it will be “found to be wholly hypothetical.”

The writer of the paragraph quoted does not say that such an experiment had been tried and that the result was found to be what he said it “would” be if so tried. But in the style of most modern astronomers he jumps from the subjunctive, or hypothetical, mood to the positive, or indicative mood, and says; “If” three equal poles “be placed in a line,” meaning I suppose in a straight line, “the middle one always appears higher than the other two outer ones.” Of course, “if the middle pole is higher, and if it be left in its position, it “always” will appear so; but this is not what Mr. G. meant to say. We may guess his meaning though his words do not express it. But were he to condescend to give particulars as to time and place others might try the same experiment, and the trick might be found out. But we think we can expose it as it is.

Three poles have to be “fixed in line with their tops cut off at exactly the same height above some level surface.” Now, mind their tops must be “cut off.” Good! It is, therefore, self-evident that if the equal poles are fixed on a “level surface” at “exactly the same height,” one pole cannot be higher than another; not even 8 inches. If they appear otherwise the poles could not have been fixed at “exactly the same height”! Yet the writer says: “If a telescope is sighted along the first to the third,” the middle pole “will” appear higher. The language is vague. The question is, does it appear higher, or does it no? Out scientist says it “will.” Well, we shall see soon whether it “will” or no; though 8 inches in a mile cannot appear much.

In the meantime we ask, what does he mean by placing the telescope “along the first” pole? This pole like the others, is upright and perpedicular to the horizon; how then can the telescope be sighted “along” the top of it? This is where the trick comes in! If you remove the first pole and put the tlescope in its place, so as to “sight” only the other two, or if you rest the telescope on the top of the first pole, the middle one may appear higher than the third; because the third being further away, looks perspectively less than the middle one which is a mile nearer. Without asking how there can be a middle pole of two, if you remove the telescope some distance away from the fist pole, and look over or along the tops of all the three poles then they will be “found” to be in the same straight line. And if the telescope be properly adjusted so as to prevent the “error of collimation” the middle pole will not be found 8 inches higher than the other two. This can be tested by experiment; but we shall proceed to prove it by the following diagram.

3-Pole-trick-5A

Let A, B, C, represent three equal poles placed at any convenient and equal distances apart, in a direct line upon the Earth’s supposed curved surface – A D. Then, according to the theory of our astronomical friend the top of the middle pole (B) will be “found” to be higher than either of the poles at A and C, as in the diagram.

Let us suppose for argument’s sake that the pole B has been “found” to be higher than the pole C. Now without removing any of the three poles A,B, C, let us add another pole – D – at exactly the same distance as the others. Ignoring pole A, let the telescope be removed to the pole B, and let it be placed in the same relative position to B as it was to A. Join the tops of B and D to represent their false line of sight. It will now be seen that C is the middle pole of the three, B, C, D; and by the same “line of reasoning” the top of the middle pole – C – will be “found to be higher than either of the poles D and B. but by this “line of reasoning” we have already “proved” that the pole B was higher than pole C, and now we “prove,” in the same way, that pole C is higher than pole B! That is, the pole B – the middle pole experimented upon, at the same time is both higher and lower than the other pole ( C ), which is absurd! Wherefore the pole B is NOT higher than the pole C, but exactly the same height above the same level surface”; and therefore this experiment does not “prove that the Earth’s form is globular.”

1) “The middle pole will (not) appear above the line joining the tops of the two ouoter ones,” if the experiment be properly conducted; and, 2) “the cause of this is (not) the curvature of the Earth’s surface,” for the mere assumption of the Earth’s curvature cannot be the “cause” of anything, that is of anything found in Nature.

But stop! It may be – yes, it is – the “cause” of otherwise intelligent men making mis-statements, false statements, and misrepresentations in support of an absurd theory, which its founder confessed was “feigned” for quite another purpose than for strict truth and integrity; for as we have now abundantly shown, the effort to support this superstitious system causes its advocated to depart alike from both.

3-Pole-trick-7A

This is further illustrated by their diagrams of ships at sea, and the way they make them climb over a supposed hill of water.

The foregoing diagrams are specimens of the false perspective given in astronomical works and school books. They are so flagrant as to need no refutation. The first ship is sledom placed on the “top” of the diagram, but a litle to one side, so that it will appear to rise first before it is made descending at once the awful decline. But then this would be to expose the “trick,” of which no doubt the better class of astronomers are fully aware; yet none of them hitherto have had the courage to denounce the deception practised by their supporters. This is left for others.

That it may be seen we are not alone in speaking thus plainly, we will quote, from Things to Come, part of an address by Mr. Thomas A. Edison, originally printed in Suggestive Therapeutics, he says:

Thomas Edison 1

“There are more frauds in modern science than anywhere else…Take a whole pile of them that I could name, and you will find uncertainty, if not imposition, in half of what they state as scientific truth. They have time and again set down experiments as done by them, curious out of the way experiments that they never did, and upon which they have founded so-called scientific truths. I have been thrown off my track often by them, and for months at a time. Try the experiment yourself and you will find the result altogether different.”

Such is the testimony of a practical scientist and experimenter, and we know his testimony is true as regards theoretical astronomy. We could quote other testimonies, but as we have already given proof that such “frauds” are practised, we think it unnecessary to do so here.

ZETETES.

Posted in Flat Earth Experiments | Tagged | Leave a comment

Globe Earth Math

Posted on May 19, 2016 by revealed4you

Here is a handy chart to print out and take on experiments or show others. This tells you various distances an object would be below the horizon. IF YOU STILL SEE some object at this distance then “We have a problem Huston.!” By the way, the mathematicians gave us this figure based on the earth being 25,000 miles in circumference, using spherical trigonometry.

Print this out and take it with you when you talk about the flat earth.

Curvature chart

Posted in Flat Earth Experiments | Tagged , | 2 Comments

The Heavens Above Stretched Out

Posted on May 18, 2016 by revealed4you

The Earth and Ocean not a Globe

THE EARTH IS NOT A GLOBE REVIEW

1894

antarctic-mountains-2

Note: The date is not on this issue that I have but I believe it’s one of the first issues, the date should be about 1894. They spelling, word usage is kept the same as in the original.

The Earth and Ocean not a Globe; but a circular-plane, according to the two great books of God, Revelation and Nature.

According to the book of Revelation, the word “world” is used more than 260 times in the Bible, and the word “earth” 350 times. The words, “round” or “globe” or “sphere” are never one applied to it. Not a single expression is used from the beginning of the inspired book to the end, suggestive of the idea that the earth is a planet, or, suggesting that the earth is anything else than a stationary plane.

1 Passages speaking of the heavens above as “stretched out,” and the earth spread forth and stretched out upon the waters, so that the line of the heavens is parallel with that of the earth. – Isaiah 42:5; Psalm 136:6. “To Him that stretched out the earth above the waters.” – Psalm 24:2. “He hath founded the earth upon the seas and established it upon the floods.” Genesis 1:10, informs us that the waters were gathered together unto one place, and called the seas, and upon those seas the earth was founded, consequently the waters are beneath and around the earth. The waters sustain the earth, sustain the earth as a whole. – 2nd Peter 3:5. “For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing or consisting out of the water and in the water.” R.V. Reads: “For this they wilfully forget, that there were heavens from of old, and an earth compacted out of water and amidst (or through) water, by the word of God.” Compacted – held together – leagued with – united. Now look! The earth is one – the continents appear to us who are on the surface as being a great distance apart, yet these continents are joined together; they are connected in the water and together they constituted one earth. These connections deep down in the water of continent with continent, are themselves sustained by the waters underneath. “The waters under the earth.” Those water under the earth, sustain the earth as a whole; sustain the earth in its entirely. “The earth compacted out of water and amidst water by the word of God.” The dry land above, or out of the water compacted, united with, the earth in the water and that again compacted, united with, the other continents, amidst or though water.

The continent of America is compacted, united with the continents of Europe and Asia, amidst or through the water of the Atlantic. The continent of Africa, though connected with Asia by the Isthmus of Suez, yet is compacted, united with Asia and Europe amidst or through the water of the Mediterranean Sea, Red Sea, and probably Arabian Sea. Australia compacted, united with Asia amidst or through the water of the Indian Ocean.

God said, let the dry land appear, the dry land did appear. Let the waters be gathered together unto one place, and the waters flowed into the place appointed for them, beneath and around the earth. Here we are on this earth – living, moving, working, trading, buying and selling. This earth is a real earth, it is inhabited as God meant it to be, and some of our fellow beings go down to the sea in ships and see the wonders of God on the great waters. This earth is a real, material earth, and this material earth, really, unmistakably and without doubt, is compacted out of the water and amidst the water. But the planet earth of Copernicus and Sir Isaac Newton is not real – it has no material existence, it is fictitious and visionary.

2 There are also passages showing that the waters surround the earth have their bounds on the great southern circumference. Job 26:10, “He hath compassed the waters with bounds, until the day and night come to an end.” In Margin, “until the end of light with darkness.” In the R.V. Is is “He hath described a boundary on the face of the waters, unto the confines of light and darkness.” Job 38:8, 9, 10, “Who shut up the sea with doors when it brake forth.” 9 – “When I made the cloud, the garment thereof and thick darkness a swaddling band for it.” 10th and 11th, “And prescribed for it my decree (or boundary) and set bars and doors, Good Hope are the ends. The great God sitteth over the circle of the earth – over the north centre and seeth to the ends of the earth. Isa. 45:22. “Look unto me and by ye saved all the ends of the earth: for I am God, and there is none else.”

Job 38:11 “And said, Hitherto shalt thou come, but no further: and here shall they proud waves be stayed?” And far out there on the southern circumference, are solid and impassable ramparts of ice, barriers – cliffs of ice – forbidding and further progress of daring navigators. It was so with Capitan Wilks and Jas. C. Ross. Well, you ask: Do the Scriptures mention these solid walls and barriers of ice out there on the southern circumference? Yes, they do. Job 80:30; “The face of the deep is frozen.” The daring navigators on the southern seas, who have told us on the solid walls of ice – the barriers and cliffs of ice – disclose to use the meaning, the sublime meaning of such passages as Job 38:30; Ps. 33:7.

The earth and ocean together constitute an immense circular plane, according to the other book of God, Nature. There are phenomenal proofs that the earth is not a globe, with north and south pole, but that the earth is a plane, having central region for its north, and, the southern circumference for its south.

3 Long periods of light and darkness, regularly alternating is a phenomenal peculiarity of the north, but not of the south, and proves that the north is the central region, and the south is the circumference.

During the summer solstice, the northern or central region of the earth is illuminated for several months together, during those moths it is a long day without a night. This is a phenomenal characteristic of the north. This being the central region, the diameter of the sun’s orbit in June is much smaller than that of its December or winter solstice, its speed is not so great or rapid as it is in December when on its outer path, or orbit on the Tropic of Capricorn, consequently its rays continue over the northern centre for several months. But in the south this is no the case, though it would be if the earth were a planet. In the south, on the contrary, the day closes abruptly in summer, they have little or no twilight. In the south seas beyond the 50th parallel, the sun will be shining brightly, and, in a very short time, the sailor who happens to be aloft, will be in pitch darkness. The sun seems to drop below the sea. At Auckland, New Zealand, there is little or no twilight. At Nelson, it is light till about 8 o’clock, then in a few minutes it becomes too dark to see anything, and the change comes over in almost no time. Twilight lasts but a short time in so low a latitude as 28 degrees south, according to Captain Basil Hall, so that from 28 degrees south, to beyond 50 degrees south, there is little or n twilight. But, in the corresponding latitudes north, the twilight continues for hours after visible sunset. In the north at midsummer, for many nights in succession, the sky is scarcely darkened.

4 The difference between north and south with regard to organic life, vegetables and animal, show that the earth and ocean is a circular-plane. The long periods of sunlight in the north, develop with great rapidity numerous forms of vegetable life, and furnish subsistence for multitudes of living creatures. But in the south, where the regions is circumferential (not central as in the north, the sunlight cannot linger, but sweeps quickly over the greater southern circle, completing it in the same time as the shorter circle of the north, viz., 24 hours, and so has not time to excite the surface, has not time to aid and stimulate animal and vegetable life to the same extent as in the north, consequently in comparatively low southern latitudes, everything wears an aspect of desolation.

The South Georgia’s latitude 54 and 55 degrees in the very height of summer, is covered deeply with frozen snow; but in the farthest north, nature is adorned with summer beauty; flowers and grasses bloom during a brief and rapid summer. Keruelan, 49 degrees south, boasts 18 species of plants, only one being useful in cases of scurvy, it is a peculiar kind of cabbage; but Iceland, 65 degrees north, 15 degrees nearer the pole in the north, boasts 870 species of plants. Kerguelan’s land, or, Desolation island, was discovered in 1772 by M. de Kerguelan, a French Navigator. Here December corresponds to our June. According to Captain Morrell Keruelan is situated in latitude 48 degrees, 40” south, longitude 69 degrees 6” east. Many of the hills on this island, though of moderate height, were covered with snow, notwithstanding that the season was midsummer. January corresponding to our July. There is not the appearance of a tree or shrub on the whole island. Captain Morrell, 1822 to 1831, in latitude 62 degrees 27” south, longitude 94 degrees 11” east, met with extensive fields of ice, one of which would have measured 150 miles, east and west.

The bones of musk oxen, killed by Esquimaux, were found on the 79th parallel north, while in the south, man is not found above the 56th parallel of latitude.

These differences between north and south could not exist, if the earth were a globe, turning upon axis and moving in an orbit round the sun. the latitudes corresponding north and south, would have the same degree of light and heat and the same general phenomena. The distance round a globe would be the same at 50 degrees south as at 50 degrees north, and the surface at the two places would pass under the sun with the same velocity, and the light would approach in the morning and recede in the evening in exactly the same manner. There would be a sameness of phenomena north and south, if the earth were a globe; but the differences are in harmony with the doctrine of the circular-plane of the earth and ocean.

5 The meridian lines diverge southwards, and the degrees of longitude increase accordingly; but if the earth were a globe, the degrees of longitude northward or southward from the equator would diminish.

From the known distance between two places in the south on or abut the same latitude, and the difference of solar time (or difference in longitude) we can calculate the length of a degree at that latitude.

JOHN T. LAWSON,

Kearney,

Parry Sound District

Ontario

Posted in Old flat earth news | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Forbidden Archaeology Lies

Posted on May 17, 2016 by revealed4you

Forbidden-Archaelogy

Doing my research on an old book that supports a flat earth, I came across a video of forbidden archaeology. I had watched a few minutes of a guy talking before a MUFON, LA group and it’s as bad as watching someone talking on Darwin and evolution! MUFON is a national group that does research into UFO and Alien sightings. Now, at one time I believed in this, UNTIL I learned about the flat earth. Anyhow, this guy talked about the extreme antiquity of humans beings on the earth (4 billion years) and that our start came from some Alien intervention. (By the way, I never believed in the billions of years of life, but just in UFOs and Aliens.)

Of course, you see right away that it gets people away from Yahweh, God, our Creator, and the Bible. Creationists believe that Adam, the first man, was created about 4,000 years B.C. This is determined by the age of each Prophet (in the same geological line) in the Bible.

I see that one day soon the government will come out and support the UFO group, as they see that evolution, through gradual genetic change, is bankrupt. So, what will be mainstream will be “we were created by advanced Aliens of some distant planet.”

Now, with the word “forbidden” used, it attracts a lot of people, as people who believe in UFO and Alien visitation, also believe in conspiracies, and the the government lies. Naturally, they gravitated towards something that looks like is opposed to the Establishment. They learned that the mainstream archaeologists don’t believe in UFOs, so the opposite must be true. No, this is nothing but leading those who are searching for the truth down a wrong road – both of which leads to a denial of God’s Word!

Don’t think that those who believe in this “forbidden archaeology” are a few disgruntled people – they are not. Looking at videos on YouTube the stats show high numbers. You can see this by looking at the thumbnails of these videos. The numbers are in the hundreds of thousands each!

If you haven’t seen any of these forbidden archaeology videos, watch one or two of them and notice all the things that are said that is contrary to Scripture. Then, you’ll see how dangerous this teaching is. Here is one here (about this guy that I listen to for a few minutes) Click Here.

It is these people, the people who go to UFO conventions, that have to be reached with the flat earth truth – followed by Bible truth. Once they see the logic, they will have no choice but to discard the science fiction belief of ancient antiquity of the human race, people from other planets, and that we were genetically manipulated to be what we are today.

Posted in flat earth discussion | Tagged | Leave a comment

God’s Words and Works Align

Posted on May 17, 2016 by revealed4you

Note: It seems like I have to put a notice on every article I post here that was originally written long ago – that any misspelling and grammar errors are in the original articles. It seems like a few readers don’t know about how grammar changed, words fall out of usage, and of course, human error done by the type-setters years ago.

Some editors like to keep the style and ‘flavor’ (or should it be ‘flavour’ lol) the same, while others make revisions to keep it up to date. This is all a matter of ‘in house editorial choice.’ Keeping the style the same is my personal choice.

Keep in mind that they did not have automatic word correction by Microsoft 100 years ago. Lol. Of course, we all make mistakes in typing and don’t catch our own mistakes. Someone thought that I should get an office worker and do this! Just for a little blog? One came just to see how many [sic] they can spot. Anyhow, trying my best to the God’s Truth out.

From Earth is Not a Globe Review

1894

There is an agreement between the word and works of God. The allusions of the word to the works are strictly accurate, and the facts of nature attest that accuracy.

The works of God are magnificent; but their magnificence is diminished and misrepresented by fanciful theories at variance with His word. To maintain the connection is to hold fast an important truth; which is a delightful duty, and is one of those few things by being faithful to which we may be “made rulers over many things.”

This work is certainly of God, for it is a vindication of the inspired accuracy of Scripture cosmogony.

I have a grateful remembrance of the late John Hampden, Esq., who kindly sent me many useful papers, one of which was: – “The geometry of the Circular-plane and the Harmony of the Solar Courses.” I am also indebted to Albert Smith, of the Leicester, England, for his suggestive paper – “The Sun-dial, a Strange Fact and a Forgotten Truth.” May God’s blessing go with the book.

John Lawson

Posted in Old flat earth news | Leave a comment

Stupid Remark by a Preacher

Posted on May 16, 2016 by revealed4you

Heaven above 1

I have heard a preacher say that, “It would make sense that God created the Universe the way He did.” (In reference to the heliocentric model and refuting the geocentric model of the Universe.)

This remark is really stupid when you think about it AND think of the billions of spinning stars and planets at the same time.

No, it would make no sense at all for God to create a planet that spins along with travelling in other directions at the same time. If you were to build an environment for construction workers, would you do so that would be round? Would you build a platform that would be moving at 500,000mph? Would you do so if there were constant shakes, tremors and bumps? Of course no!

In short, IF we were on a round planet and travelling though space in many directions, we’d FEEL IT. Of course, in the make pretend world of Copernicus and Newton they explain everything away. Naturally, God created a flat and stationary earth because He knew that it would have to be this way in order to:

make things level

sail from one point to another

building homes

doing delicate work that requires complete stillness

to be able to fly from one place to another

where “up” and “down” is the same direction for everyone

and simple because it’s common sense and logical

That is why God build the earth the way He did – flat and stationary. That is how we build buildings and infrastructure – with everything based on flat and stationary foundation. Heck, even if we decided to live in the mountains – how do we build our homes? FLAT. We have to level out the FOUNDATION and everything built on that would be level, too. Can you imagine if a builder said, “The floor is only 3 inches off but that’s OK. After all the earth is a sphere and you have no problem with that.” naturally, no home owner would put up with that. If a floor was off, say 3 inches, the chairs would not be flat, the table would not be flat. Each time you changed the weight on the table it would shift. An orange on the table would roll off. We simply could not put up with living in a home that is not flat. So why would God create a world for us to be like that?

The earth is flat and stationary; that is why we can build and travel on it. Thank God!

Posted in flat earth discussion | Tagged | 2 Comments

Rivers Would Have to Travel Up Hill and Down Hill on a Globe

Posted on May 16, 2016 by revealed4you

axial-fig46

Have you ever thought of rivers would have to travel up hill or down hill (depending wherethey are in relation to the equator) if the earth was a globe!

The Global Earth theorists for 500 years have been telling us the Earth is a sphere. IF the earth is a globe, and is 25,000 English statute miles in circumference, the surface of all standing water must have a certain degree of convexity–every part must be an arc of a circle. From the summit of any such arc there will exist a curvature or declination of 8 inches in the first statute mile. In the second mile the fall will be 32 inches; in the third mile, 72 inches, or 6 feet.

Hull-fig83

Measurements are quite easy to determine the angles of curvature based on 360 degrees and the number of feet of change per number of miles along a curved path. To determine how much the Earth falls away on the curve you take miles squared X eight inches. This is an inverse relationship so the farther one travels the greater the distance of feet or miles the Earth will fall away.

Let the distance from T to figure 1 represent 1 mile, and the fall from 1 to A, 8 inches; then the fall from 2 to B will be 32 inches, and from 3 to C, 72 inches. In every mile after the first, the curvature downwards from the point T increases as the square of the distance multiplied by 8 inches. The rule, however, requires to be modified after the first thousand miles. 1

Miles squared X 8 inches

one foot = .000189394 miles

Curvature of Earth:

1 mile 5.33 ft. or .12626 mile

10 miles 66.666 ft. or 1.2626 miles

100 miles 6,666.66 ft. or 12.626 miles

So the farther one travels the greater the drop (or rise) in distance.

****

The Great Rivers and Earth’s Curvature

Look at the above map of the greatest rivers in the world. Some flow North, some South, some Easterly and Westerly. Some are below the Ecuador, above and near the Ecuador.

The longest rivers are thousands of miles in length. Many, like the Nile and the Missouri are in central valley plains and deserts with little or no elevations.

However, given the curvature of the Earth, larger rivers would have to follow the arc. If flowing towards the Equator or Poles, they would have to flow uphill, if flowing away, then downhill, sometimes both. Yet this most basic of physics must occur on a globular Earth, yet does not.

“Whoever heard of a river in any part of its course flowing uphill? Yet this it would require to do were the Earth a Globe. Rivers, like the Mississippi, which flow from the North southwards towards the Equator, would need, according to Modem Astronomic theory, to run upwards, as the Earth at the Equator is said to bulge out considerably more, or, in other words, is higher than at any other part. Thus the Mississippi, in its immense course of over 3,000 miles, would have to ascend 11 miles before it reached the Gulf of Mexico!” -David Wardlaw Scott, “Terra Firma” (126)

If you were travelling from some point south to some point north a distance of 1,000 miles, it would take more fuel – IF the earth was a globe. Ask a boat captain how much extra fuel it takes to go up hill on the ocean and he would think that you were crazy? Yet, these same captains think that the earth is round.

The Mississippi River is one of the world’s major river systems in size, habitat diversity and biological productivity. It is the third longest river in North America, flowing 2,350 miles from its source at Lake Itasca through the center of the continental United States to the Gulf of Mexico.

At the headwaters of the Mississippi to the NW, the average surface speed of the water is near 1.2 miles per hour. Downstream at New Orleans the river flows 3 miles per hour on average. This is impossible on a ball where the river has to flow upwards towards the highest point at the Ecuador.

The Earth cannot be a sphere.

Posted in Bible and science | Tagged | Leave a comment

Biblical Bases for Geocentric Universe from True Flat Earthers

Posted on May 14, 2016 by revealed4you

Heaven above 2

“We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.” – William Casey, Ronald Reagan’s first CIA Director (from Casey’s first staff meeting, 1981)

The Bible describes a cosmos that few of us would recognize today.

The earth is fixed and immovable and lies at the center of all things. The sun moves about the earth, not the other way around (but not over the underside of earth). Use of the phrase “solar system” should therefore be avoided in favor of the more accurate “geosystem.”

The earth is flat and finite. Its boundary may be circular, but the earth is most certainly not a sphere as was hypothesized by Eratosthenes (a pagan scientist who lived two centuries before the birth of Christ). The placement of globes in public classrooms can only serve to promote ecology as a possible state religion.

The sky is the roof over the earth — a solid impervious barrier that protects both believers and non-believers from the waters beyond. The term “outer space” is a notion perpetrated by secular humanists, new age gurus, and other freethinkers.

The stars on the sky are much smaller than the earth. (The word “on” is not a typographical error here.) The notion of “distant suns” is nothing more than a theory entertained by misguided scientists.

The laws of physics as they exist on the earth are different from those of the sun, moon, stars, and planets. Astronomers should look to the Bible and not the Principia before they aim their telescopes. The former is the unerring word of God while the latter is merely the word of Isaac Newton. Nearly all scientist now recognize Newtonian mechanics as flawed, having inadequately explained the precession of the perihelion of the planet Mercury. (Newtonian mechanics has since been replaced by Einstein’s general theory of relativity.)

You’d think Ralph Reed and Jerry Falwell would be up in arms over these facts. Massive government bureaucracies send spacecraft to distant planets. The liberal media are awash in images of a spherical earth. (The Universal Studios logo is a globe!) Children in public schools are taught from Kindergarten that the earth revolves around the sun. With the exceptions of the persistent use of the terms “sunrise” and “sunset,” our modern world is flooded with images of heretical cosmologies that remove the earth from its God-given place at the center of all things. Only an atheist would buy the notion that we live on a tiny rock, circling an insignificant star in a galaxy of billions of stars in a universe of billions of galaxies. Why would God place his most holy of all creations in such location? Surely, no true believer in the Scriptures — the divine and unerring word of God — would accept the scientific notion that we live in place that is not special in the eyes of our Creator. I find it quite reasonable to insist on a Constitutional amendment requiring all Supreme Court justices to swear their allegiance to geocentrism and flat-earthism. Our souls and the souls of our children lie in their hands.

Source: http://hypertextbook.com/

Posted in Bible and Flat Earth | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Principle

Posted on May 14, 2016 by revealed4you

There are some geocentric believers who believes the earth is the centre of the Universe BUT there are still other planets (globes) out there, too. They believe the earth is a globe, too, but that we are the centre of the Universe. Even this worries Establishment “scientists” in that, it means that we on earth have a special purpose and that we are a creation of God. Yes, the earth is the centre of the Universe BUT that it is composed of just what the Bible says Heaven and earth and not billions of planets.

Also, notice the film uses CGIs of the Universe.

The heliocentric believers here are wrong – with the belief of billions of globe planets – but the fact that they say we are the centre of the Universe  is correct. This does worry the heliocentric believers.

Yes, the Bible tells us that we are the centre – God’s of attention.

This radio interview with the Executive Producer of “The Principle” along with writer and Producer, Rick Delano. In short, the Establishment is worried as their “beloved” scientists are attacked in the film.

Posted in flat earth discussion | Tagged | Leave a comment