Attraction Is A Myth
From Earth Not a Globe Review, January 1895
By “ Zetetes”
The attraction of gravitation a myth ? Y e s ! a fabulous story, with
no foundation in fact, though having an APPARENT support in some
terrestrial phenomena. Many people imagine that gravitation is a word
representing some discovered fact or force in N atu re ; but let them
proceed to show us what fact or force, and they will discover their
mistake. Gravitation was an invention, not a discovery; and a supposition
necessitated by another hypothesis, viz .; the globular theory. One
was invented to support the other. Without gravitation the globular
theory falls ; and without the globular theory what would become of
gravitation ? I t would become less and lighter than our little molecule
of hydrogen, and fly away into unknown and uncivilized regions.
“ Parallax” proved the globular theory false, by the F A C T that the
surface of water is horizontal; and “ Zetetes,” the investigator after
Truth, practically proves, that the theory of gravitation is utterly false,
by a little molecule of hydrogen gas ! No one can even tell us what
gravitation is, or how it acts. Now, although we may not know what
electricity is, or magnetism ; we do know how they act. As I showed
in No. 2 Earth Review, Newton did not know how gravitation acts, or
whether it really be attraction, or repulsion ; that is, he did not know
whether there is such a thing as attraction or not. Where Newton
failed to guess, what other mathematician dare try ? I f the inventor did
not know, who amongst his pupils can tell ? But they should first prove
that gravitation does act before they attempt to explain how it acts.
The magnet is no proof of gravitation. Its power is selective and
limited. It seems to attract steel and soft iron, but it will not draw
stones and wood ! Gravitation is supposed to attract all bodies, even
the stars. They are all supposed to be pulling hard at one another, yet
they never get any nearer together. It is strange ! But does the magnet
really attract steel ? The iron or steel goes towards the magnet, but is
its motion caused by the attraction or the repulsion of some force ? It
may be carried by a magnetic current, not drawn by the magnet itself.
Newton confessed that the idea of bodies acting “ upon one another at
a distance,” and “ without the mediation o f anything else by and through
which their action and force may be conveyed from one to the other,”
is “ so great an absurdity, that,” says he, “ I believe no man, who has in
philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking, can ever fall into
it.” Yet many do fall into this error. They are not Zetetics. I stand
on a bridge and I watch a log of wood coming down the stream towards
the bridge. Is the bridge attracting the log from a distance ? Yes, as
much as ever the magnet attracts the soft iron ! I f there were a weir by
the bridge, the log would remain by it, as the iron remains attached to
the magnet. I f not, and if the arch under the bridge be sufficiently
wide, the log would pass under and follow the stream. Then the bridge
would seem to be repelling the log, like one “ pole ” of the magnet will
repel the magnetic needle. Ye t by such flimsy arguments and pre
texts is the theory of attraction supported. No man in the world can
define gravitation, nor tell how it acts ; it is a tissue of philosophical
speculations and falsehoods, unworthy of honest men and thinker’s,
perhaps the most ingenious theory of gravitation ever proposed is that
of Le Sage. He “ imagines,” says Mr, J. E. Gore,
“ An infinite number of ultra mundane corpuscles of excessive minuteness, speeding
through space in all directions, and with enormous velocities. Two bodies in this
ocean of flying corpuscles screen each other from the molecular bombardment, and
would consequently move together with a force varying inversely as the square of the
distance.”
Upon which Professor Tait remarks:
“ It is necessary also to suppose that the particles and masses of matter have a cagelike
form, so that enormously more corpuscles pass through them than impinge upon
them ; else the gravitation action between two bodies would not be as the product of
their masses.”
Well might Sir John Herschel say:
“ The hypothesis of Le Sage, which assumes that every point of space is penetrated
at every instant of time by material particles sui gene7-is, moving in right lines in
every possible direction, and impinging upon the material atoms of bodies, as a
mode of accounting for gravitation, is too grotesque to need serious consideration! ”
“ Too grotesque to need serious consideration!” One of the
theories of gravitation “ grotesque ! ” And a clever astronomer says so,
not an humble zetetic! An humble zetetic agrees with him though.
What then must the poorer theories be ? Readers, take your choice
between common sense and reason, theories “too grotesque to need serious
consideration.”
Mask Wearing Debate
Mask Wearing Debate by Two Well Known Alternative Media People
Here what Mike Adams defense – who is for wearing a face mask. Then listen to (or read) the response by a scientist about the uselessness of wearing a face mask. Then you’ll be able to defend your position – or change it, depending on your situation now.
Mike Adams Article
Click Here
Joseph Mercola Article/Video
This video is two hours long.
Click Here
Highlights of The Video
Not a single randomized controlled trial with verified outcome has been able to detect a statistically significant advantage of wearing a mask versus not wearing a mask, when it comes to preventing infectious viral illness
If there were any significant advantage to wearing a mask to reduce infection risk to either the wearer or others in the vicinity, then it would have been detected in at least one of these trials, yet there’s no sign of such a benefit
There is no evidence that masks are of any utility for preventing infection by either stopping the aerosol particles from coming out, or from going in. You’re not helping the people around you by wearing a mask, and you’re not helping yourself avoid the disease by wearing a mask
Infectious viral respiratory diseases primarily spread via very fine aerosol particles that are in suspension in the air. Any mask that allows you to breathe therefore allows for transmission of aerosolized viruses
All-cause mortality data are not affected by reporting bias. A detailed study of the current data of all-cause mortality shows the all-cause mortality this past winter was no different, statistically, from previous decades. COVID-19 is not a killer disease, and this pandemic has not brought anything out of the ordinary in terms of death toll.
*****
The Quickest Way to Make People Think Twice About What They Are Told About Covid-19
(You can make this shorter if you they don’t have time to listen to the following.)
We all have heard about the number of cases and deaths of covid victims. We hear it on a daily bases. Each county, state and country have their numbers; the numbers on a daily bases and the total numbers.
Now, from whatever country you are from, find the figures of what covid deaths are. Do you have them? Write it down.
Now, look up the number of deaths from heart disease for the same period of time. What is it? Do it for cancer and pneumonia. What are the numbers.
Which numbers are higher? Where is Covid-19 on the list? What is the difference?
Tell me, do you hear what the deaths are each day from heart disease? No. Do you hear it for the other diseases? No. Is all the news on TV around the topic of heart disease? No.
If you believe in Covid-19, let’s think about the numbers they tell us.
You’ll see that the deaths from heart related diseases are much, much higher than Covid-19. Yet, we closed down the whole country; put millions out of work and have 100s of thousands of business closed for good. You have the whole nation told that they can’t go out, to be on the alert, keep your distance of 2 metres, put up plastic screens in shops, the forced wearing of face masks. All for what? These low numbers?
Yet, with much higher numbers of other causes of death, we have business as usual. We never closed down businesses or whole countries before, yet life went on.
“Oh, but the coronavirus is contagious!”
Really? If that is the case, why aren’t half the beach goers dead or even got sick from covid after the lock down? They are all doing fine!
And what about the common cold and other viral infections that we are TOLD are contagious, did we ever lock down a town, a state or the whole country? No. So, why are we doing it now?
Well, that’s another story. But I just want you to wake up, think about what you’re told, do some research and decide for yourself.