Fake Science: Mass Hypnosis At Work

Source: fixedearth.com/

Use of mass hypnosis is successfully and relentlessly employed so often–in marketing, politics, warfare, science, religion–for example, that few people are even aware that they have been hypnotized at one level or another.

red-bull-2To be successful at hypnotizing masses of people, a message has to connect with something they want, or believe in, or can identify with. Whether it be Patriotism, a Soda, Global Warming, WMDs, Security, Religious Doctrine, TV Commercials, etc, –or “news” about “Space Science”–we are all jerked around at some level by Mass Hypnosis. Endless Repetition is an essential element for success, of course.

Sometimes these messages can appeal to our better natures and be good, or at least, not real bad. But, more often than not, it seems, we get sucked into supporting and defending financially, physically, emotionally, intellectually, something that we know very little about, and is hurtful and destructive to our whole well being. This kind of hypnosis can conquer the mind and is very hard to root out EVEN when exposed.

In that last category we all have before us a phenomenon wherein people’s minds worldwide have been conquered by clever and relentless applications of Mass Hypnosis. What we want to identify here and now is a very specific example of Mass Hypnosis which is demonstrably in virtual control of the foundation of the whole world’s knowledge. Indeed, this extraordinarily Dark Side of Mass Hypnosis is firmly in control of the world’s “textbook knowledge” about the origin of all that exists. The ultimate testimony to the power of this specific application of Mass Hypnosis can be seen in the hard truths it violates in every one of its lies.

astro-not swimThese repressed Truths reveal that this most virulent strain of Mass Hypnosis is embedded in today’s fact-free “Space Science” which is: a) Contra-scientific by definition; b) Based entirely on assumptions; c) Violates ALL observational/ empirical evidence; d) Not “secular” science, as claimed, but is derived concept for concept from the Pharisee Religion’s “holy book” Zohar/Kabbala.

Make no mistake; the very foundation of all of mankind’s “knowledge” depends on what is believed to be the Truth about the Origin of all that exists. No one can go further back than the beginning in a search for the True Origin of all that exists. Therefore, whatever one believes is the Truth about the Origin of Everything automatically becomes the foundation upon which all other “knowledge” is processed.

Given those FACTS, let’s start by discovering why it is that every University and Library and News Organization in the world testifies 24/7 that the Truth about this foundational Origins knowledge has been settled by “Space Science”:

First–even in Search Engine and Encyclopedia Accounts–we see that ALL histories of science affirm that–beginning in 1543 with the Copernican Model of a rotating, orbiting Earth–“The Copernican Revolution” launched “The Scientific Revolution”. Between then and now–with the help of Kepler, Galileo, Newton, Darwin, Einstein, Sagan, Schroeder, et al–those Revolutions have established a “Scientific Paradigm”–i.e., a “Scientific MOLD” into which all science must fit. That MOLD is Space Science’s Big Bang Paradigm of c.15 billion years of Evolutionism.

So we are dealing with these TWO FACTS: 1) Acceptance of Space Science’s Model of a rotating, orbiting Earth is viewed as scientific fact at all levels of education around the world. 2) All substantive resistance to the Big Bang Evolutionary Paradigm in the world’s Universities, News Outlets, and Religions has also ended.

Thus–insofar as “Space Science” and its role in hypnotizing masses of mankind with the ruling Big Bang “Origins Paradigm” is concerned–control of the Origins foundation of all knowledge–through NASA largely–rules the “sciences” today.

Since there is not the first fact in either the purely mathematical Copernican Model or in the Big Bang Evolutionary Model, their conquest of the Origins Foundation of all of modern man’s knowledge can only be explained as the mass acceptance of pure deception over observationally certified facts which cancel the deceptions. As noted, this sort of Mass Hypnosis is readily acknowledged in marketing, politics, warfare, etc. But so universal has been the replacement of demonstrably “True Science”–both terrestrial and extra-terrestrial–with the Idolization of demonstrably fraudulent deceptions of this magnitude, that its success can only be attributed to Mass Hypnosis.

But what motives could be behind such deception? What power could lead it to virtual conquest of the foundational truth of the Origin of all that exists?!

1st: The entire motive is religious. Every single component of both the Copernican Model and the Big Bang Model is derived from long-secret teachings from the Pharisee Religion’s Kabbala. All of those teachings predate the Copernican Model by centuries. Using a 42 letter name for g’d, 1st century Kabbalist HaKanna said the universe was 15.3 billion years old. 13th century Kabbalist Nachmanides wrote of a rotating earth, relativity, a “big bang”, expanding universe. Kabbalist Isaac Luria codified all this before his death in 1572. Each concept has been put into the books by Kabbalist-friendly “theorists” Einstein, Bohr, Gamow, Penzias, Sagan, etc., (and a couple of Gentiles) to give us today the Pharisee Religion’s “Origin Model”.

Until c.1990 the world had not known that the Copernican Model and the Big Bang Model are both part of the Pharisee Religion’s alternate “creation scenario” set forth in its Kabbala. From Copernicus until the present, both of those Models have always been and continue to be presented to the world as “secular”–i.e.,–non-religious theoretical science. This has been and now is pure deception.

Once it is understood that this monumental deception–which has culminated in the Big Bang Evolution Idol– is an alternate Creation Model of the Christ-hating Pharisee Religion, the motive behind it all becomes crystal clear. That Religion’s masquerade as “secular theoretical science” has enabled it to deceive the world with its 15 billion year evolutionary “Origin” of the universe, the earth, and mankind, while all the time this Religion’s control of “Science” has been kept totally secret!

That Religion’s “Talmud/Kabbala holy books”–with their author Satan as their admitted power source–have nearly achieved their goal of destroying the Credibility of the Christian Religion’s Holy Book, the Bible and its Messiah. This achievement translates into the destruction of the credibility of Jesus Christ, the same goal that the same Religion had at the Cross 2000 years ago.

Satan’s formula for bringing about this destruction has been simple and focused. It has been implemented by the Pharisees with the assistance of those who call themselves Jews and are not (Rev. 2:9; 3:9). All that was needed was to replace the no evolution at all Biblical Creation Account of the Universe, Earth, and Mankind with the Kabbalist Big Bang “creation account” of 15 billion years of evolution.

However; just as Satan’s plan has been simple and focused, so is the Biblical God’s Plan for revealing all that deception! God’s Plan says Babylon (Satan’s Empire) will “fall” in “one hour, one day” (Acts 15:18; Rev. 17:12-18; 18:8, 10, 17, 19) just as written.

When that fall occurs (“one hour” after a Global Government is seated: Rev. 17:12; 13:2b-8; 18:2; etc.) the whole world will know that a Satan-imposed Mass Hypnosis has been behind the Pharisee Religion’s successful masquerade as “secular theoretical science”. This Hypnosis has planted the contra-scientific Big Bang Evolution Idol in modern man’s history and knowledge and all its social and spiritual manifestations.

Subsequently the whole world will know that the Bible’s Father God and His only begotten Son have fulfilled their infallible WORD to that point in time. It will also be clear that what remains of this world’s history will likewise unfold exactly as written. All false church doctrines, [See: Creationists End Time Doctrine] all false religions, along with all false science will be Revealed during that same Fall of Babylon time frame (c.2-3 months).

With the Hypnosis broken everyone worldwide will know which are God’s Truths and which are Satan’s Lies. This inescapable knowledge brings on a Biblically promised separation [See: EvolSci Divides Populations] between those who hate the truths they have been forced to learn (Rev. 13:2b-8), and those who love those same truths (Rev. 18:4; 17:14 (or pretend to love them):13:7; 14:7-9; 16:15). Worship Satan and the “Beast” (Rev. 13:2b-8) or worship Jehovah God and Jesus (v.7; 14:7; 9; 16:15). Those will be the only choices as this earth enters its final phases, i.e., the 7 trumpet plagues (Rev. 18:4; 8:7) and the “little season” (Rev. 20:3).

Christ’s “called, chosen, and faithful” (Rev. 17:14– accompanied by God’s Two Witnesses Rev. 11:3)–will force the Biblical Creation Truth into the Christian Churches first (I Pet. 4:17, 18; Rev. 14:6, 7, 8). [See: House of God] This is the beginning of the “war”–the Bible’s promised “Truth Blitzkrieg” – that Jesus wins which causes Babylon’s Fall (Rev. 17:14; 14:6, 7, 8).

The Copernican Lie is the keystone holding up Satan’s Babylon.[See: Keystone] When that Lie is exposed, Satan’s beguiling hypnotic deceptions are Revealed and his entire edifice built on those hypnotic deceptions Falls. The time frame for Babylon’s Fall begins “one hour” (2-3 months) after a Global Government is seated (Rev. 17:12; 13:2b-8).

Biblical Truth is the wrecking ball that smashes Satan’s edifice of deceptions built on false science. Christian Churches will learn how Satan has used their abandonment of the non- moving earth Scriptures to destroy the credibility of the Bible. Then their “end time” hypnosis rooted in 12th, 13th, 16th, 20th, & 21st century Pharisaic Zionism will crumble too.

flat earth, brain washing,

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

NASA’s Agenda

Promoting Copernicanism & Evolutionism

http://www.fixedearth.com/nasas-agenda.html

ISS ControlsNASA has a spiritual agenda. Yes, spiritual. It projects the image of cutting edge science opening exciting space frontiers for the good of mankind, but the facts say otherwise. Judge for yourself:

On the Space Administration’s Web Page we read: “NASA’s ORIGINS PROGRAM will search for clues to help us find our cosmic roots.”

“Cosmic roots…?? Origins Program…???

There are two major beliefs about the origin of mankind and all other life forms. One says God created man and everything else not very long ago. The Bible states this view over 100 times and allows for no other explanation. God created everything fully formed as part of an eternal plan, the Bible teaches. Period. The other belief says everything came to be as it is accidentally and randomly as the result of natural forces acting upon themselves and “evolving” over billions of years. Clearly, the evolutionary belief is anti-Bible, but–more to the point about NASA’s goals being spiritual–it is a belief that attributes miraculous powers of creation of all that exists to a “force” or a god known as “matter” (and “gases”). Matter did it all. All hail “matter”! No God who demands recognition and accountability is needed! With “matter” as creator we can do what we want (’cause nothing matters…).

As might be expected, a compromise belief has arisen out of these two opposites. It is called “theistic evolutionism”. This view acknowledges that there has to be a God to explain the mind-blowing design that exists any which way we turn. But, says the Theistic Evolutionist, this God did not create everything fully formed but used an evolutionary process over billions of years to do the job. This evolution-dependent compromise allows a Creator God of sorts, but does not allow the Omniscient and Omnipotent Creator God Who authored the Bible. (Of note too is the fact that the Moslem Koran makes no compromise with evolution either….).

Therefore, NASA’s stated goal of searching space for clues to man’s origins reveals the premise behind their taxpayer supported Origins Program. That premise is that evolution is true and the Bible (along with the Koran) is false. This premise is not secular; it is spiritual. It claims to be scientific and therefore independent of religion. It is not scientific, as we shall see. It is religious, as we shall also see. The evolutionary premise violates all known science and logic. It does not have the first piece of verifiable evidence to support the squirrely evolution myth it calls “scientific”. Evolutionism embodies a single spiritual agenda, viz., disqualify and replace the Bible as the source of Truth.

In support of its Origins Program, NASA says it will answer such questions as:

“Are there any planets outside our solar system that are capable of supporting life?”

“How did life originate on earth?”

“Is there life (however primitive or evolved) outside our solar system?”

Under the heading “ORIGINS SCIENCE” we see that NASA makes it plain that its goal of establishing extraterrestrial evolutionism is symbiotically connected to its dependency on another “scientific” hypothesis. Note this connection and the dependency upon the unproven Big Bang hypothesis that NASA is using to achieve its goal of establishing evolutionism as a “fact”. From part of its Web Page we read: from th

“NASA’s ORIGINS PROGRAM follows the 15-billion year long chain of events from birth of the Universe at the Big Bang, through the formation of the chemical elements, galaxies, stars, and planets, through the mixing of chemicals and energy that cradles life on Earth, to the earliest self-replicating organisms and the profusion of life.”

Seen in this statement is the unmistakable dependency of NASA’s evolutionary agenda upon the Big Bang Myth. That Myth grants them and others the billions of years that the Evolution Myth requires. “Time” is indeed the hero of this plot!

  • NASA goes on to say that “The long-term goals of ORIGINS address fundamental questions about our place in the Universe:
  • How did galaxies form in the early universe and what role do galaxies play in the appearance of planetary systems and life?
  • How do stars and planetary systems form and are there life-sustaining planets around other stars?
  • How did life originate on Earth and does it exist elsewhere in the universe?”

Now notice very carefully HOW all this is to be accomplished:

“ORIGINS will use revolutionary new technologies to investigate these questions…”

Underscore revolutionary new technologies! They are revolutionary all right! Under the next heading we will see the utter deception that NASA is building into these “revolutionary new technologies”. Further along, we will see that these technologies are designed to achieve their Bible-bashing goal of establishing extraterrestrial evolutionism thru the use of highly sophisticated VIRTUAL REALITY SIMULATIONS…. (More on high tech fraud in space. [See: Virtual Reality Fraud, Redshift Fraud, NASAs Hanky-Panky, Size-Structure Pt 6])

For the moment though, let’s just add a thing or two to further establish that: 1) NASA’s goal in its Origins Program is to settle the argument over Origins in favor of evolutionism, & 2) That this goal is Spiritual rather than scientific….

We can read many places that the late Dr. Carl Sagan (d.Dec.’96) was closely associated with NASA’s planetary exploration involving The Mariner, Viking, Voyager, and Galileo missions. What we don’t read about in many places is that Sagan was a avid pot-head. His biographer, Kay Davidson, AP writer Scott Andrews, Harvard Psychiatry Prof. Grinspoon, his widow, Ann Druyan, etc., all confirm that his essays and scientific insights were products of marijuana assisted inspirations. That Sagan was totally sold on the evolutionary explanation for all that exists is reflected in all his writings (the evolution of the human brain, little telescoping critters on the moon, his famous Cosmos TV series, etc.). He carried that zeal for replacing Biblical creationism with evolutionism over into his highly praised work at NASA. Indeed one Web bio summed up those years by noting that: “He played a leading role in the American space program since its inception.” In a posthumous award to Dr. Sagan, “the National Science Foundation declared that his research transformed planetary science….”

Sagan capsulated his belief about man’s significance thusly: “Who are we? We find that we live on an insignificant planet of a humdrum star lost in a galaxy tucked away in some forgotten corner of a universe in which there are far more galaxies than people.”

This evolution-grounded nihilistic mindset has been prevalent in and out of academia for several generations. It’s not surprising that Sagan embraced it, nor that few if any dissenters toward that mindset would be found in NASAdom. By the time Sagan (and lots of us) went to the University, eight or ten generations of increasingly sophisticated indoctrination had seemingly closed and locked the door against any challenge to the Copernican Model which made the Earth go around the Sun instead of the Sun going around the Earth, as the Bible taught. The ever-increasing spread of Darwinism after the 1850’s demanded millions and then billions of years for evolution to take place. Clearly, the Sun, Moon, and Stars had to be billions of years old too for they could not be younger than the Earth. Indeed, a universe billions of years old was the only way Evolutionism could lay hold on the billions of years it needs to lend even superficial credibility to its fantastic claims.

So, let it be set in factual concrete: Copernicanism and Darwinism (i.e., Heliocentricity and Evolutionism) are Siamese Twins. Appearing first, Copernicanism paved the way for Darwinism’s success by using invented mathematical models in the physical science “disciplines” of Astronomy and Physics, and by contradicting the Bible’s teaching about an immovable Earth at the center of Creation with the Sun going around daily. Darwinism then reinforced Copernicanism by requiring billions of years for everything to evolve. Now the Biological Sciences had joined with the Physical Sciences in contradicting the Biblical Creation with its young Earth and Man as the special Creation of God, made in His Own Image and with an option for eternal life on a heavenly New Earth. All that was needed by the time of Sagan’s University days was a way to get rid of the stubborn, lingering belief in God’s Creation of Mankind in six literal (“evening and morning”) days. This belief had to be put on a level with the almost totally defeated and forgotten belief in a very special unmovable Earth at the center of God’s plans. Nobody argued for that anymore, but hundreds of millions of people were still clinging to a conviction that evolution theory was total nonsense and that Mankind is the special creation of an Almighty God with a great purpose and plan for His Creation. How could this resistance to evolution be ended once and for all??

That was the challenge that faced hallucinating “exobiologist” Sagan and Co. when he got in the driver’s seat at NASA. In that position, taxpayer’s billions of dollars could provide the ways and means to eliminate all challenges to the Big Bang model as the “scientific” explanation for the origin of the universe, Earth included. Then thru the development of cutting-edge computerized telescope and camera technology a way was opening up to settle the creation/evolution controversy forever in favor of evolution.

Of course, Sagan’s total commitment to evolutionism (in tandem with Biologist J. Gould at Harvard) was spread far and wide thru his TV Cosmos series and his books at the time computer technology was developing. He taught that widespread extraterrestrial evolution was a certainty and would soon be proven. He was at the center of NASA’s drive for perfecting computerized telescopes and cameras with Virtual Reality technology for a dozen years before he died. But he didn’t live to see the job completed. Just a couple of years before his death, he admitted in his article “The Search for Extraterrestrial Life” in the Scientific American (’94) that of all of his NASA supported missions: “None of these [spacecraft] encounters has yielded compelling, or even strongly suggestive, indications of extraterrestrial life.”

That’s a pretty strong confession when you think about it. Indeed, “Exobiology” is a “science” with no data…the ultimate oxymoron.

In 1992, four years before Sagan’s death, Daniel Saul Goldin became NASA’s Administrator. His policies earned him many accolades, including the title of “brilliant visionary” and being named “one of the 100 most influential men and women in government”. No one questions his ability to vigorously and innovatively fulfill NASA’s stated goals. His vision has nowhere “been more evident than in his comprehensive strategy for space exploration”. We want to take a very close look at the main components of that “comprehensive strategy” momentarily, but let the overriding goal of that strategy be understood and underscored yet again.

Mr. Goldin did not alter the goal of finding extraterrestrial life forms and establishing evolutionism as a “scientific fact” which will no longer be contested by anyone. Indeed, his administration streamlined NASA’s whole operation by putting those revolutionary new technologies mentioned earlier on afterburners, as it were. Mr. Goldin meant to see NASA’s goal accomplished, and he meant to do it speedily.

His Web bio reveals that: “He initiated the ORIGINS PROGRAM to understand how the Universe has evolved, to learn how life began on Earth and to see if life exists elsewhere.” (Goldin update [See: NASAs O’Keefe])

Let’s see how he proposed to achieve these goals. Go to: NASA’s Hanky Panky Virtual Reality Technology.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Bible Teaches That the Heavens Are a Solid Dome, Embedded with Stars

The Bible Teaches That the Heavens Are a Solid Dome, Embedded with Stars

flat earth old newspaperThe Bible teaches that the earth was “flat and circular sitting on pillars with a rotating solid sky dome overhead which carried the Sun, the Moon, and the Stars and allowed water to leak through ‘windows of heaven’ or sluice gates to form clouds and rain.”

Ancients believed in a flat earth that was covered by a solid dome. Below are listed some examples of ancient cosmologies prevalent 2,000-5,000 years ago.

Sumerians

Ancient Sumerian hymns and myths provide a picture of the universe’s creation. The Sumerians believed that a primeval sea existed before anything else and that the heaven (an) and the earth were formed within it. The boundary between the primeval sea and the earth (a flat disk) was a solid vault, within which was the gas-like atmosphere. The stars, planets, sun, and moon were embedded in this solid vault.

Greeks

The Greek philosopher Anaximenes described the heavens as like a felt cap that turned on its head, with the stars fixed to this surface like nails.

Jews

Note: The Jews, as we know them were not the ancient Israelites, but that would take a book to explain.

Some of the Jews also endorsed solid dome cosmology, For example, Josephus, the Jewish first century Jewish historian, believed that the earth was surrounded by a crystalline firmament:

After this, on the second day, he placed the heaven over the whole world, and separated it from the other parts, and he determined it should stand by itself. He also placed a crystalline [firmament] round it, and put it together in a manner agreeable to the earth, and fitted it for giving moisture and rain, and for affording the advantage of dews.

A portion of the Jewish Talmud indicates that the Sun travelled under the firmament by day and above the firmament by night:

“The learned of Israel say, “The sphere stands firm, and the planets revolve”; the learned of the nations say, “The sphere moves, and the planets stand firm.” The learned of Israel say, “The sun moves by day beneath the firmament, and by night above the firmament”; the learned of the nations say, “The sun moves by day beneath the firmament, and by night beneath the earth.”

Early Christians

Theophilus of Antioch, a second century Christian wrote that heaven was a dome-like covering:

“For the Spirit being one, and holding the place of light,(2) was between the water and the heaven, in order that the darkness might not in any way communicate with the heaven, which was nearer God, before God said, ‘Let there be light.’ The heaven, therefore, being like a dome-shaped covering, comprehended matter which was like a clod.”

Here is what the book of Enoch (a non-biblical ancient text) says about ancient cosmology:

And from thence I went to the ends of the earth and saw there great beasts, and each differed from the other; and (I saw) birds also differing in appearance and beauty and voice, the one differing from the other. And to the east of those beasts I saw the ends of the earth whereon the heaven rests, and the portals of the heaven open. And I saw how the stars of heaven come forth, and I counted the portals out of which they proceed, and wrote down all their outlets, of each individual star by itself, according to their number and their names, their courses and their positions, and their times and their months, as Uriel the holy angel who was with me showed me.

Biblical passages endorse dome cosmology.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Vanishing Ship

The Vanishing Ship

From an old flat earth publication

https://christianflatearthministry.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/vanishing-ship-the-search-truth.pdfVanishing Ship, The (Search Truth)

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Gospel in Britain

The Gospel in Britain

Established long before the Catholic Church said it did.

God’s Kingdom Ministries

by Dr Stephen Jones

Perhaps no one caught the imagination of the Church in the Middle Ages more than Joseph of Arimathea. Much lore rose up around him as the centuries passed. However, there are some basic truths that stand out, proven by subsequent events as well as by genuine scholars, ancient and modern.

There is one undisputable fact that emerges from any serious study of early Church history: the Church in Britain was among the first to be established after the day of Pentecost. The Roman Church, of course, has long been embarrassed by this and has worked hard to hide the facts proving this. The British Church was not subject to Rome for many centuries, and thus the later Roman Church did not recognize them as being Christian until they came under Rome’s headship over six centuries after Pentecost. Yet, as Rev. W. Morgan tells us,

“The British Church was represented during his [Constantine’s] reign by native bishops at the Councils of Arles, A.D. 308, and Nice, A.D. 325.” (St. Paul in Britain, p. 111)

How could there be no British Church until the seventh century, when British bishops were represented at Church Councils in the fourth century? The main fact is that in the fourth century, those British bishops were recognized by Rome as Christians, simply because Rome had not yet demanded submission of all Churches in exchange for the right to be called Christian.

In fact, it is well known by all historians that Constantine himself was a British general, though he was part of Rome’s army. Rome had many generals from other nations, for their armies were full of foreign soldiers. Constantine was favorably disposed toward Christianity from the influence of his mother, Helena (Helen of York), who was also a famous early Christian song writer. As Sozomen tells us in his Eccl. Hist.. lib. i. c. v., “It is well known that great Constantine received his Christian education in Britain.” He also came into contact with the Roman-Christian teacher, Lactantius, while living in Nicomedia during the reign of Diocletian, for we read in Hans von Campenhausen’s book, The Fathers of the Latin Church, p. 79,

“Before the outbreak of the great persecution [303 A.D.], Constantine certainly stayed for some time at the palace of Diocletian in Nicomedia as a kind of hostage for his father. It is a likely guess that the young foreign prince had at least already met the equally foreign rhetorician of distinction.”

When the Diocletian persecution broke out, Lactantius was allowed to retire peacefully. However, the same author tells us that when Constantine later became emperor, he appointed Lactantius to be the tutor of his oldest son, Crispus, in Gaul at the palace in Treves.

In 596 A.D. when Britain was “evangelized” by the Roman missionary, Augustine (not the bishop of Hippo by the same name who lived two centuries earlier), his mission was not to convert the British to Christ, but to convert Christians to the Roman Church. Augustine was rebuffed. Morgan quotes Bacon’s Government of England as follows:

“The Britons told Augustine they would not be subject to him, nor let him pervert the ancient laws of their Church. This was their resolution, and they were as good as their word, for they maintained the liberty of their Church five hundred years after his time, and were the last of all the Churches of Europe that gave up their power to the Roman Beast. (p. 101)

“The soldier who interrogated Augustine at the oak of Conference seems, in like manner, to treat the question between them as one quite apart from doctrine.

“ ‘Does Rome possess all the truth?’

“ ‘All.’

“ ‘And you say we do–our usages only differ. Now of two men, if both have all their limbs and senses complete, both are equal. Because the Romans have noses, and we have noses, must we either cut off our noses to be Romans? Must all who have noses be subject to the Romans? Why, then, should all who hold the faith be subject to Rome because she holds the faith’?” (Morgan, St. Paul in Britain, p. 102)

Morgan quotes many ancient sources to show that the British Church had long been established and was in full strength by the time Augustine arrived there to subject them to Rome’s headship. On page 105 he quotes the Jesuit, Robert Parsons, in his book, Three Conversions of England, vol. 1, page 26,

“The Christian religion began in Britain within fifty years of Christ’s ascension.”

He quotes also Polydore Vergil, lib. ii,

“Britain, partly through Joseph of Arimathea, partly through Fugatus and Damianus, was of all kingdoms the first that received the Gospel.”

He quotes Sir Henry Spelman’s Concilia, vol., p. 1,

“We have abundant evidence that this Britain of ours received the faith, and that from the disciples of Christ Himself, soon after the crucifixion of Christ.”

Alford’s Regia Fides, Vol. 1, p. 19 is quoted as well,

“The faith which was adopted by the nation of the Britons in the year of our Lord 165, was preserved inviolate, and in the enjoyment of peace, to the time of the Emperor Diocletian.”

This referred to King Lucius, who had proclaimed Britain to be a Christian Nation, he says, in 165 A.D., while the Church in Rome was still suffering under the Roman Emperors. At the same time, Lucius was baptized by his 83 year old relative, Timothy, in 139. This Timothy was the son of Pudens and Claudia. Lucius was the grandson of Cyllinus, the brother of Linus and Claudia. [See Appendix 2.]

Morgan cites other ancient sources:

“In A.D. 600, Venantius Fortunatus, in his Christian hymns, speaks of Britain as having been evangelized by St. Paul.

“In the year A.D. 408 Augustine of Hippo asks, ‘How many churches are there not erected in the British isles which lie in the ocean?’ And about the same time Arnobius writes, ‘So swiftly runs the word of God that though in several thousand years God was not known except among the Jews, now, within the space of a few years, His word is concealed neither from the Indians in the East nor from the Britons in the West’.”

Morgan likewise provides us with quotations from Chrysostom, Patriarch of Constantinople, in 402 A.D., Jerome (378), and Eusebius (320), all referencing the strength of the Church in Britain. Since the Roman Church claims these writers as their own, it is plain that they are being disingenuous in their claim that Britain was evangelized only in the seventh century. It is clear that there were many churches in Britain in earlier centuries. Only when Rome demanded submission in later centuries, denying Christian status to any Church that did not comply, was Britain suddenly denied Christian status until long after the failed Augustinian mission.

The question, then, is not whether or not there existed a British Church in the earliest days of the Church. The question is whether or not a Church must submit to Rome to be Christian. By Rome’s definition, no Church calling itself Protestant, Evangelical, Pentecostal, etc. is really Christian. They have a right to their opinion, of course, but they should not use that opinion to deny the existence of a non-Roman Church.

And so the Church of Rome in later years has attempted to suppress the near unanimous consent of its own early historians as to the early evangelization of Britain. For example, The Catholic Encyclopedia writes under “Joseph of Arimathea,”

“Likewise fabulous is the legend which tells of his coming to Gaul A.D. 63, and thence to Great Britain, where he is supposed to have founded the earliest Christian oratory at Glastonbury.”

No proof is given to sustain their disdain, and in a single sentence, they dismiss what virtually all of the Catholic Church historians have affirmed for many centuries. In fact, Morgan tells us on pages 63 and 64, that the antiquity of the British Church was unsuccessfully challenged in the fifteenth century at Church Councils, where the seating arrangement of the representatives were established according to the antiquity of their Church:

“This priority of antiquity was only once questioned, and that on political grounds, by the ambassadors of France and Spain, at the Council of Pisa, A.D. 1417. The Council, however, affirmed it. The ambassadors appealed to the Council of Constance, A.D. 1419, which confirmed that the decision of that of Pisa, which was a third time confirmed by the Council of Sena, and then acquiesced in. This decision laid down that the Churches of France and Spain were bound to give way in the points of antiquity and precedency to the Church of Britain, which was founded by Joseph of Arimathea ‘immediately after the passion of Christ’.”

(The Catholic Encyclopedia gives the date for the Council of Pisa as 1403, and the Council of Constance as 1414-1418.)

Another great fabrication of history thrusts Britain outside the boundaries of civilization just because they were outside the boundaries of the Roman Empire. From the perspective of the Roman government, any people outside of its borders were “barbarians.” Yet Britain had many centers of higher learning which were so rigorous that it took twenty years to master their courses in philosophy, astronomy, geometry, and many other subjects which, in that day, were accepted everywhere as the mark of civilization.

In the sixth century, Gildas writes of Britain:

“These islands received the beams of light—that is, the holy precepts of Christ—the true Sun, as we know, at the latter part of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, in whose time this religion was propagated without impediment and death threatened to those who interfered with its professors.” (J. W. Taylor, The Coming of the Saints, p. 141)

Gildas no doubt was referring to the writing of the Roman Christian lawyer, Tertullian, around 200 A.D. who had written in his Apology, V,

“Tiberius accordingly, in whose days the Christian name made its entry into the world, having himself received intelligence from Palestine of events which had clearly shown the truth of Christ’s divinity, brought the matter before the senate, with his own decision in favour of Christ. The senate, because it had not given the approval itself, rejected his proposal. Caesar held to his opinions, threatening wrath against all accusers of the Christians.”

Tiberius Caesar died in 37 A.D., thus fixing the time of the arrival of Joseph of Arimathea and his companions around that time.

© 2021 . All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Login

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 4 Comments

The Electric Universe

The Electric Universe

http://www.fixedearth.com/electric.html

Several of the main conclusions of The Electric Universe Model fit The Geocentricity Model of the Bible like a glove. Notice:

galaxy 1A) The Biblical Model forbids The Big Bang Model now controlling Astronomy and Physics and NASA’s evolution-premised “Origins Program”.

B) The Electric Universe Model likewise rejects Big Bangism. “There was no Big Bang….”(1)

A) The Biblical Model repudiates the wholly misleading billions of light-year distances hawked regularly in all the media.

B) The Electric Universe Model declares that “The visible universe…is much smaller than we thought…. We have no idea of the extent of the universe”.(2)

“We have direct evidence of stellar evolution but in a time scale comparable with the human life time.”(3)

A) The Biblical Model contradicts all secular science about the age of the universe, dating its creation along with all else that exists in it during six 24 hour “evening and morning” days some 6000 years ago.

B) The Electric Universe Model concludes that “We don’t know the age of stars, since the thermonuclear evolution theory does not apply to them….We have no idea of the age…of the universe.”(4)

(Some amplification of these dramatic conclusions is given further along….)

——-

This is not to say that this happy confluence of cosmological essentials which The Electric Universe Model shares with the Biblical Model is recognized (yet!) by EUM (Electric Universe Model) advocates. I have seen no indication in what I’ve read that these EUM folks are connecting their discoveries with anything Biblical. On the contrary, one can see that the exobiological evolution mind-set is well entrenched in statements such as this: “Life is most likely to form inside a brown dwarf star”, and “Our search for intelligent life shall therefore focus on the faintest close stars [the L type Brown Dwarfs] in the sky.”(5) But, a big break with standard Big Bang cosmology is evident in the word “static” in this quote: “The visible universe is static and much smaller than we thought”.(6)

Still, somewhere along the line–sooner than later, I expect–that agreement between the Bible and the EUM on some very basic cosmological essentials will ultimately become plain in all its implications for these folks; no doubt to the consternation of some and the joy of others. Nevertheless, welcomed or not, EUM discoveries contain the scientific rationale for dissolving not only the most nagging quasi-obstacle to a geocentric universe, viz., the alleged ever-increasing distances of stars that must revolve around the earth daily, but also threatens to scale down the age of the universe (and hence, Earth) so dramatically that there will be no time left for evolution to occur.

As to those alleged distances to galaxies, another able EUM advocate reminds us that the establishment idea that “…galactic distances can be determined by redshift is an assumption [and the] only basis of the further extrapolation that the universe is expanding and the only reason for believing that there ever was a big bang.”(7)

That same writer goes on to explain that even Hubble himself made it clear in his 1937 book (The Observational Approach To Cosmology) that he was very uncomfortable with the “recession factor” being attributed to him as “The Hubble Expansion”. If one just sticks to the observed facts, Hubble concluded, “There is no evidence of expansion and no restriction of the time scale, no trace of spatial curvature….”(8)

So the point to be heavily underscored here is that the ever-increasing confirmations of the impossibilities of the thermonuclear-furnace concept for our sun and other stars, coupled with the immediately intelligible concept of an electrical grid… arcing power from one ball of lightening (the sun, a star) to another through a highly conductive plasma, is a concept that is not only capable of sending modern-man’s “knowledge” of the universe based on Big Bangism to that overflowing ash-bin of discarded “scientific” hypotheses, but is, at the same time, opening wide the door to re-thinking and ultimately confirming the Biblical Model of the universe with our non-moving Earth at the center of it all.

——-

Those who have begun to grasp the mega-importance of the Geocentrism Revolution now brewing–a revolution that will enlist true science in returning to the Biblical Geocentrism Model of the universe [See: Size-Structure Pt 1] -will have no difficulty in recognizing the other false science dominos that must fall when the heliocentric deception that made possible the Big Bang deception is toppled.

Just as the physical sciences were beguiled by Copernicanism and spurred on to bring about a steady deterioration of Bible credibility in the all-important Truths about the origins and nature of the universe, just so did that deterioration pave the way for the beguiling of the life sciences to embrace the Darwinian mythology. Thenceforth, the regression of modern man’s “knowledge” that has resulted because of the rejection of these two pillars of Biblical Credibility (ex nihilo creation of the universe with a stationary earth, and the creation of all life forms on the earth), is a regression that demonstrably gave birth to various shades of Marxism, Freudianism, Saganian extraterrestrialism, and, to a thoroughly confused and Bibleless Churchianity…merrily blown about by “every wind of doctrine” that comes its way.

So deeply imbedded in modern man’s psyche have these regressive phenomena become that historians in recent years have been labeling these times as the “Post-Christian, Post-Biblical Era”, foolishly believing (as I once did!) with atheist Nietzsche that: “God is dead. We have killed him with our science.” By contrast, the Bible (which limits no true science), gives this caveat: “…avoid oppositions of science falsely so called, which some professing have erred (made mistakes) concerning the faith.” (I Timothy 6:20,21).

The heliocentricity deception is the lynchpin, the keystone, the raison d’être of all these deceptions. It’s exposure will lay bare these “wiles of the Devil” that have come to rule modern man’s “knowledge” [See: Knowledge Impact] while submerging the Absolute Truths of God’s Word. The Electric Sun Model–intentionally or unintentionally–is coming forth as yet another slayer of false science’s mythical Big Bang counterfeit of God’s Creation, bringing with it a revelation which will quickly turn the telescope around and point back to its Copernican beginnings.

——-

It is necessary to understand that the central plank of the EUM is this: “Stars are electrical transformers, not thermonuclear devices.”(9) Beyond the happy agreement with the Biblical Model in vital areas mentioned above that this central plank allows, these other agreements reveal that– when a few ad hoc heliocentric parasites are fumigated off of EUM–it will be seen to be quite compatible with the Biblical Cosmos Model….

For example, the arbitrary speed limit that Einstein set on light immediately bites the dust in the EUM. “The speed of light is not a barrier,” we are told (10). More Einstein-bashing is evident in these words of EUM physicist, Wal Thornhill: “Time travel is impossible”; “Space has no extra dimensions in which to warp or where parallel universes may exist”; ” There are no neutron stars or Black Holes.”(11)

As to “black holes”, Thornhill gives his conclusions about Einstein and his devotees:

“It seems to me that Einstein made it fashionable for theoretical physicists to live in their heads and perform “thought experiments”. It is one thing to frame hypotheses by day-dreaming but to think that experiments are carried out by sucking on a pipe in an armchair is pure “Disneyesque” fantasy. Einstein’s theory of gravity is the craziest explanation of the phenomenon imaginable.

I believe a recent cartoon in Scientific American has unwittingly shown us where black holes are to be found:

They exist inside the heads of theoretical astrophysicists!

And with their eyes wide shut and fingers in their ears, there they shall remain.”(12)

I personally am glad to read such assessments of Big Al, because, as readers of The Earth Is Not Moving know, and as many have favorably commented, the historical record of Einstein given in two chapters and elsewhere in the book lead one to these same conclusions about “black holes” or any other product of his “thought experiments”.

Sayonara Albert E… (A. E. was the choice of all Zionist controlled media to receive the honor of “Man of the 20th Century”. From the Bible-bashing Talmud/Kabbala point of view, he disserved to be so crowned. After all, his Relativity, curved space, etherless, time-warping nonsense not only rescued Copernicanism from the nose-dive it was in after interferometer experiments repeatedly showed no movement of the earth, they also laid the necessary ground-work for the introduction and success of Big Bangism, which further made possible the whole Saganesque brand of evolution of “extraterrestrials” now about to be foisted on the world thru NASA’s VR technology. [See: NASAs Agenda, NASAs Hanky-Panky, NASAs Spirit.Roots, Virtual Reality Fraud, Redshift Fraud, Size-Structure Pt 6]

——

Newton–like Einstein, over-praised and under-criticized by secularists and Bible liberals alike because his work seemed to establish heliocentricity–is also seen to be a first cousin to Humpty Dumpty in the Electric Universe Model. In the EUM, “…electrically charged bodies embedded in a charged Plasma Gas accounts for “99.999% of the matter in the universe….” More: “Electromagnetic forces are infinitely more powerful than gravity and capable of simply explaining phenomena attributed to Black Holes. Electromagnetic …forces can repel or attract. Gravity only attracts. [Plasma cosmology] is verifiable by experiment because of the enormous scalability of the phenomena.”(13)

Newtonian “gravity” simply can’t cut the mustard when it comes to explaining the phenomena in the universe that it has been called upon to explain.

“The mathematical shorthand that was developed for articulating the gravity view and for using the technologies based on it doesn’t work for the plasma view….the definitions are different, the facts are different, the math is different, the theories are different….”(14)

“Gravity… `sees’ fewer features and `sees’ them as disparate events, each requiring a separate ad hoc explanation…. The generality of gravity is obscured with ad hoc inventions, and those inventions fail to account for details intrinsic in the plasma view. Gravity fails to account for entire new observations, extrapolating itself beyond reality and into denial.”(15)

(My emph.: see note on TIDES at end….)

A summary quote about Newton:

“Newton was unaware of plasma. Today his disciples spend years in training, learning when and how to shut their eyes to it.. It’s not just the Big Bang, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics that are in trouble, but the foundation of all of them: GRAVITY IS AN EXHAUSTED AND BANKRUPT CONCEPT.”(16) (emph. added)

——-

Further characteristics of the EUM as proposed by Juergens, Thornhill, Peratt, Lerner, Scott, the Achesons et al which enhance the Biblical Geocentrism Model will probably be included in future Monthly Bulletin Links on The Earth Is Not Moving web page. Look for them if the potential for the sensible features of this exciting new cosmological paradigm show the same remarkable alignment with the Bible Model that I am now seeing….

——-

As something I personally view to be a near perfect example of the quotation above about Newtonian Gravitational Theory “extrapolating itself beyond reality”…I plan to take an eight page chapter from The Earth Is Not Moving entitled “TIDES” and link to it in the next Bulletin. If interested, look for it amongst the link titles after that date.

——-

Bibliography:

1 – http.//www.holoscience.com/eu/synopsis/12.so what.htlm, 1-14-01, p.1

2 – Ibid.

3 – THOTH, A Catastrophics Newsletter, Vol. 2 No.2, 1-31-01, Don Scott, p.9

4 – Holoscience, 12, so what?, p.1

5 – Holoscience, Philosopher’s Corner, 1-21-01, p.5 (holoscience.com)

6 – Holoscience, so what?, p.1

7 – THOTH, 1-31-01, Amy Acheson, pp.13,14

8 – Ibid.

9 – Holoscience. so what?, p.1

10- Ibid.

11- Ibid.

12- THOTH, 1-31-01, pp.13,14

13-Wal Thornhill, “Definition”, Net transmission, 1-14-01, p.

14- Mel Acheson, Ibid., p.2

15- Ibid.

16- Ibid (or with Thornhill), p.3

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Explaining the Tides

Explaining the Tides

The Moon Designed To Serve Mankind

Source:

No one would quarrel with the fact that there is a relationship between what the Moon does and what the Tides do. The Bible, after all, says that the Moon was designed to serve mankind through “signs” (which could certainly include Tidal phenomena), and through “seasons”, and by giving light.

Moon 6-2021However, to say there is a relationship or connection between the Moon and Tides is one thing; to say that the Moon causes and controls Earth’s tides (as the whole world has been taught as a scientific fact) is quite another thing.

In the first instance–since God has said that one of His purposes for making the Moon and having it behave as it does is precisely for man’s aid in such things as gauging tides, planting, harvesting, etc.–we see the relationship as supernatural. These are “signs” and they have always worked and they work now for those who read them. Thus, there is a relationship or connection between the Moon’s behavior and supplying useful and necessary knowledge for man.

In the second instance, however–since “science” has said it will explain everything in natural terms without God and will designate all supernatural explanations as superstitions held by unenlightened people–we find that the obvious connections between the Moon’s behavior and certain phenomena such as Tides must be explained naturalistically by the science establishment.

So, God gave His supernatural explanation for Tides, which man has rejected. In its stead, man has come up with a purely naturalistic explanation for the tidal phenomena. In short, man’s “science” has declared that the Moon’s gravitational pull (assisted by the sun’s pull) causes the Tides. This declaration is now counted as a “fact” of science.

Vern, one of these explanations is the Truth and one is a lie. Let’s see if we can find out which is which…. First, let us look at some facts and see where they take us logically. For instance, there is a real fact about a neutral gravity zone between the Earth and the Moon. I quote from a letter from NASA dated April 5, 1990 addressing this matter:

“…On a direct line from the Earth to the moon, equal gravitational effects would be found at approximately 216,000 miles, given a mean distance of 240,000 miles between the two bodies….”20 (Emph. added)

Other sources confirm this understanding. Figures XIV & XV {reproduced in book only} are taken from one of famed rocket scientist Werner von Braun’s books. They illustrate this neutral gravity zone.

OK. So all we are describing here is something that must logically be true if the statistics about the Earth and Moon gravitational pulls are fairly accurate. Earth’s gravity is said to be six times as strong as the Moon’s gravity, or said the other way, the Moon’s gravitational attraction is 1/6 or about 17% that of Earth’s gravity.

Somewhere between the two bodies the pull of one body has got to be overcome by the pull of the other one. At this point (which NASA says and von Braun confirms averages c. 216,000 miles from the Earth) there is a neutral gravity zone where the Earth’s gravitational pull becomes weaker than the Moon’s gravitational pull and, at this same point, the Moon’s gravitational pull becomes weaker than the Earth’s gravitational pull.

This circumstance is demanded by the gravity concept and all the supposed facts and laws that describe the Earth and Moon gravitational fields. OK, Vern? Now keep that in mind as we read what “science” says about Tides on Earth….

What “science” says is that the Moon’s gravitational pull reaches out thru the neutral gravity zone (where it couldn’t attract a balloon full of feathers, a dead horse, or the Astrodome) and goes on beyond 50,000, 100,000, 216,000 miles and sucks the big ole Earth toward it like stretching a rubber ball! I know it’s incredible; I know it’s insane, but that’s what the naturalistic (i.e., “scientific”) explanation demands that the Moon must do. Read it for yourself from these examples (which are repeated in every book on the subject):

“Strange as it may seem [yeah!], what we normally think of as the solid body of the earth is also affected by the moon, so that it too [the Earth, that is] has a tide. The landmass of the earth is elastic and actually rises and falls about 4 1/2 inches. We do not feel these land tides…but they do take place.” 23 (Emph. added)

In his book, The Lunar Effect, author Lieber says: “…the pull of the moon distorts the earth as if it were a rubber ball. The North American Continent may rise so much as a foot when the moon is overhead.”24

The famous “science” writer Asimov says: “…the earth, so to speak, is stretched in the direction of the moon. The solid earth does not stretch much, however (only about nine inches on each side), and only delicate measurements can show this stretch.”25

He’s lying about the “delicate measurements”, of course. No measurement shows this (and what the others said) or could show it. Mathematical decorations derived from and supportive of this crazy hypothesis might show a 9″stretch (twice what the other guy just said), but no measurement has or can show it.

In a kid’s “science” book we read: “Now the land of the earth does not move easily, but the waters do. The waters on the side of the earth closest to the moon pile up in a “bulge”, causing a high tide. But at the same time there is a high tide on the other side of the earth. What do you suppose is the reason for this? The answer is that, as the moon’s gravity pulls the water nearest to it a little away from the earth, it also pulls the whole earth a little away from the waters in the ocean on the farthermost side, setting up a second high tide there.”26

In The Moon: Earth’s Natural Satellite, author Branley says the same thing in explaining his diagram on the tidal phenomena: “…the ocean at E [the furthermost from the moon], because it is so much farther away is not pulled toward the moon as much as the solid earth; the earth is pulled away from the water; and the water is therefore deeper during this part of the tidal cycle.”27 (emph. added)

Branley then gets into some numbers which grow out of the myth he believes, numbers so contradictory as to be comical if the world weren’t mesmerized by this deception: “The tide-raising force of the moon is very small indeed, compared to the force of gravity. The tide-raising force of the moon is about 1/9,000,000 that of the earth’s gravity….”28

Wow. One nine millionth Let’s see; that means the earth’s pull toward its own center on its own crust and oceans and seas is nine million times as great as the Moon’s pull on the same features, doesn’t it? Nine million to one. Whew! Amazing, isn’t it that nine million mule power could be pulling something one way and one mule power could overcome all that every hour of every day and stretch the Earth and cause zillions of cubic feet of water to shift around everywhere! Yes, just amazing, especially when that one mule power stopped out there at the 216,000 mile neutral gravity zone! Momma mia…

Well, it would take a book to get into all the nutty theories that rest upon the central idea that the Moon’s gravity reaches out with ghostly fingers beyond its own back yard across another 216,000 miles of Earth’s gravity’s back yard and stretches a body with 81 times its own mass and 50 times its volume like a blob of dough.29

Part and parcel of this nonsense is the “tidal friction” goofiness spawned by Charles Darwin’s son, Sir George Darwin. This concept says that the tidal movements cause friction against the rotating earth and have been slowing it down about 1/1000 of a second per century (!) for some 5 Billion (that’s “B” as in Bill) years.30 Another author dealing with the same subject figures about 14 seconds a century for the slowdown. Anyway, Sir George figured this on back to where the Earth was spinning around every five hours or so and the Moon was so close you could kick it. However, all this tidal friction slowed the earth down over those billions of years to the present 24 hour, 1037 MPH speed, and somehow or other caused the Moon to recede to its present distance. George didn’t stop there, but figured this on into the future, concluding that:

“…after billions of years, earth will require 47 days to make a rotation and the moon will require 47 days to go around the earth.”31

For this “concept” (no more or less screwy and unscientific than his daddy Charles’ Evolution “concept”), Georgie is in the scientist’s Little League Hall of Fame in any book you pick up on the subject and was knighted “Sir” to boot. Makes one wonder who’s in charge of this world’s system of recognition and so forth, doesn’t it? (The Bible says, of course, that Satan the Deceiver is allowed to be god of this world until he is removed forever (II Cor.4:4). If that be true, then it is perfectly understandable why the individuals who advance Satan’s deceptions in the world would frequently be important figures in all aspects of that world system). [See: histrev]

Then there is that part of the gravity-causes-tides-looniness which brings in the sun’s gravitational effect. This tells how the sun’s gravity both assists and counteracts the moon’s pull to produce Spring Tides and Neap Tides which come about a week apart. The same principles apply. And then there is the supposed effect of the moon’s gravity on the Earth’s atmosphere…. And on and on. It would take a book, Vern, Imatella you….

Nevertheless, it hasn’t escaped the attention of any reader, I’m sure, who has come this far (Hello…), that the vast eons of time required for all this cosmic buffoonery to transpire fit hand in glove with that other master-myth of modern history, evolutionism. Time is the hero of both of these plots! Both of these myths have the same author. Both have the same future, namely exposure and destruction by the Truth of God in the coming Fall of Babylon. More on that in another place….

But just to make sure that all this Earth-stretching-to-cause-tides-concept is understood to be an integral, necessary part of the whole naturalistic, humanistic, heliocentric “wisdom” and “knowledge” where tides are concerned, let’s look at one more example. And believe it or not, Vern, I stumbled upon this gem in the bird-lover’s magazine, Audubon, for September 1989. It was an essay entitled “Pull of the Moon”. In it author Steinhart incorporates the conventional “wisdom” about tides in a way that speaks volumes about how deeply this myth has penetrated:

“There was plenty of reason for ancients to worship the moon. The moon exerts a profound influence upon the earth. As it passes overhead, its gravitational force pulls a bulge of sea water, causing the high tides. As it lines up with or opposite the sun,–at the times of the new or full moons–the tides are highest. It even pulls a bulge in the earth as it passes. Moscow rises twenty inches twice a day. And at times the Empire State Building is sixty-three feet closer to the Eiffel Tower. Because it tugs harder on whatever is closer, it pulls the earth more than it pulls the water on the far side of the earth. So there is a bulge of water on the backside of the globe too–a second daily high tide.”32 (emph. added)

Well, enough examples. In simple terms, as part of the world-wide indoctrination into heliocentricity, there had to be a mechanism to explain the motions of the heavenly bodies, what keeps them in their places, and so on. That explanation, that mechanism is called “The Law of Universal Gravitation”. It is credited to Newton but was first formulated by Kepler, as we’ve seen. This “Universal Law of Gravitation” is taught and believed by one and all but is, nevertheless, an absolutely insane concept which violates and contradicts its essential magnetic principle every second of every day, year in and year out.

Even if one can momentarily lock one’s brain into conceiving of a delicate balance between the Earth and the Moon’s gravitational forces, a balance that would be achieved by the most precise, exact and unvarying distance between the two bodies, then that same brain is boggled when it is confronted with the fact that no such stable distance exists between these two bodies (or any other two!). Indeed, the undeniable reality is that the moon regularly varies its distance from the Earth by over 31,000 miles! When it comes closer and closer it gets in the stronger and stronger pull of Earth’s gravity. How can it then resist that pull and start going against that attraction? Contrariwise, as it goes out to the apogee and is moment by moment breaking loose from Earth’s gravitational pull at tremendous speed, how can it stop the outward movement and start back??

Gravity doesn’t explain this. Gravity can’t explain it. Gravity doesn’t explain the tides. Gravity can’t explain them. The same is true of the Earth’s supposed annual orbit around the sun. The simple fact is that we are closer by three million miles to the sun at certain times than we are at other times.

The gravitation explanation for heavenly bodies doing what they do has no scientific evidence whatsoever behind it. It is pure nonsense from A to Z, a contradictory, illogical, impossible notion perpetrated upon the world by You Know Who to discredit the Bible.

Indeed, universal gravitation is a bankrupt and stupid hypothesis incapable of explaining tides( just the same as Darwin’s “natural selection” mechanism is now being recognized as a bankrupt and stupid hypothesis that is incapable of explaining evolutionism). These bankrupt hypotheses both have the same author, Satan the Deceiver. They both have the same purpose; undermining the credibility of Scripture. They both have the same destiny; exposure as lies to be adhered to only by those who “cannot receive a love of the Truth” (II Thess. 2:10), i.e., those who “willfully” embrace these lies when they know better (II Peter 3:5), by those, in short, whose real god is the Father of Lies (John 8:44).

Shall we gravitate to another topic, Vern, ole Chap?

By all means, Bo Bo, if you can but cease with these weightless attempts at levity!

I’ll try….

(Note: An overview of “The Electric Sun” Model which explains attractive and interactive phenomena in the universe much more sensibly than the “Gravity Model”….)

Bibliography

#20 – Brian Dunbar, Public Affairs Officer, Office of Space Service & Applications, NASA, Washington, D. C., 4-5-90.

#21 – Werner von Braun, First Men to the Moon, (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, 1960), page 36 & inside cover.

#22 – Ibid.

#23 – Carroll V. Glines, Col. USAF. The First Book of the Moon, (Franklin Watts, Inc., N.Y., N. Y, 1967) , p. 21.

#24 – Arnold L. Lieber, The Lunar Effect, (Anchor Press, Doubleday, Garden City, N. Y., 1978), Jacket Cover.

#25 – Isaac Asimov, The Double Planet, (Abelard-Schuman, London. N.Y., Toronto, 1960), p. 100.

#26 – Jean & Cle Kinney, What Do The Tides Do?, (Young Scott, Pub., 1966), p. 32.

#27 – Franklyn M. Branley, The Moon: Earth’s Natural Satellite, (Thomas Y. Crowell Co., 1960), p.84.

#28 – Ibid., p. 85.

#29 – Ibid., p. 82.

#30 – Ibid., p. 86.

#31 – Ibid.

#32 – Paul Steinhart. “Pull of the Moon”, Audubon, September, 1989, p. 32.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment

Mathematical Evidence of the Divine Inspiration of the Scriptures

Mathematical Evidence of the Divine Inspiration of the Scriptures

Source:

A converted Russian nihilist, Ivan Panin, graduated from Harvard in 1882 as a mathematician. He then spent 50 years (wow!) on deciphering the mind-blowing mathematical structure of the Bible from the first word to the last. Since every letter in every word of the Hebrew and Greek manuscripts also has a numerical equivalent, every letter, word, phrase, sentence, paragraph, and even every subject has a definite arithmetical sum.

What follows is a severely abbreviated example of the kinds of phenomena Dr. Panin discovered when working with those numerical equivalents…regardless of whether they pertained to a given subject such as the genealogy of Christ, or a book of the Bible, or the Bible in its entirety. Marvel at each of these as you read:

· The number of words in the vocabulary will divide by the number seven.

· The number of words beginning with a vowel is divisible by seven.

· The number of words beginning with a consonant is divisible by seven.

· The number of letters in the vocabulary of a subject (like the genealogy of Christ) is divisible by seven.

· Of these letters, those which are consonants and those which are vowels both divide by seven.

· The number of words occurring more than once is divisible by seven. Those occurring only once likewise divide by seven.

· The number of nouns is divisible by seven. The numbers that are not nouns divides by seven.

· The number of proper names divides by seven. The male names divide by seven. The female names divide by seven.

· The number of words beginning with each of the letters of the alphabet is divisible by seven.

Having explained the function of numeric and place values in the Hebrew and Greek languages in Scripture, it is noted by way of example that the value of the word “Jesus” in Greek is 975, of which the numeric value is 888, and the place value is 87. These features produced these astonishing results in addition to the previous examples:

· The numeric value of the vocabulary is divisible by seven.

· The numerical value of the various alphabetical groups of words is divisible by seven.

· The numerical values of the various forms in which the words occur produce the same phenomenon.

Dr. Panin challenged any person to write one paragraph of 300 words intelligently and produce some numeric phenomena of like designs, and complete it within six months. Anyone who could do it would prove himself/herself a wonder. No takers.

Since many of the writers of the Scriptures were men from ordinary walks of life with little or no schooling, it is beyond astonishing that the same harmonious numerical features were found in different wording of the same or similar accounts, as in the four Gospels. Even more amazing, the number of words found in Matthew that are not found in any other New Testament book display elaborate numeric design. How did Matthew know that he had used words that would not be used in any of the other 26 books? He would had to have before him all of these books, and would have to have written last.

It so happens, however, that each of the other books shows the same phenomena! Did each writer write last?! If not, then, was each writer a mind reader as well as a literary and mathematical artist, never equaled and hardly even conceivable?

But that is just the start of Panin’s findings! He proceeded to prove that every book of the Bible carries such features, that each one is necessary to cause the numerical scheme of the entire Bible to work out correctly, and that nothing can be added to or subtracted from the Bible, as we have it, without spoiling these features. From the first verse of Genesis to the last verse of Revelation, these divine evidences are found. The God of nature is, therefore, proved to be the God of Scripture. The quarrel of modern skeptics, therefore, is not with believers of the Bible, but with God Himself.

Panin’s discoveries revealed that several numbers other than seven produced equally astonishing results. For example–having gone through detailed lists of the known and unknown authors of the Bible’s 66 books and through their arrangement from the Hebrew Received Text and the Greek Text and the numeric values of the names of those which have known authors–it was found that the sum was 721 elevens. The sum of the factors involved was 121 or 11 x 11.

The presence of these factors of 11’s in connection with the number, order and names of writers is either accidental or designed. That the number of books in the Bible should be a multiple of 11 might be purely accidental. Since, however, only every 11th number is a multiple of 11, the chance for any number being a multiple of 11 is only 1 in 11.

That this number could be so divided between anonymous and non-anonymous books that each class could also be a multiple of 11…. Well, this may also be accidental, but the chance of it happening is only one in 11 x 11, or one in 121.

That this number could also be divided between anonymous and known authors by 11’s among the authors of only one book and those of more than one may be due to chance, but the chance of this being accidental is only one in 11 x 11 x11, or 1,331.

Going thus far through the 8 features of 11’s noted, every one might be accidental, but the chances for their being so is only one in the 8th power of 11, or 214,358,881.

The sum of the numeric values of the 26 authors (7,931) is also a multiple of 7. Of this number the 21 writers of the Old Testament (3 sevens) have 3,808, or 544 sevens, and the N.T. writers have 4,123 (589 sevens). Of the 3,808 belonging to the O.T., 2,933 (419 sevens) belong to the writers of the Law and the Prophets, from Moses to Malachi, and 1,190 (170 sevens) belong to the writers of the so-called Hagiographa, from David to Nehemiah. Seven of the 21 O.T. writers (3 sevens) are expressly named as such in the N.T.; Moses, David, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Daniel, Hosea, Joel. Their numeric value is 1,544 (222 sevens). The numeric value of Moses who heads the list and John who closes it, is 345 plus 1,069, totaling 1,414 or 202 7’s.

The Bible begins with the Hebrew word “beginning” and ends with the Greek word hagios, “saint”. The Hebrew word occurs in the following books (lists them) and the Greek word occurs in the following books (lists them)…. These books are 42 in number (6 sevens). Take the respective numbers of these books in the order of their place and there sum is 1,575, (225 sevens).

These eight features of 7’s in connection with the order and writers of the books may also be accidental, but the chance for these features of 7’s and 11’s happening together is one in billions.

The conclusion of these and many other similar features–the labor of a professional mathematician for half a century, remember–is what anyone open to the Truth will readily concede, namely, no mere human authorship of these phenomena is possible. Only a superior mathematical mind, the very mind of God could have planned these numeric results (unbeknownst to the writers themselves). Verbal inspiration of the Scriptures in this discovery of mathematical configurations which are immediately recognizable and instantly understood to be far beyond the capabilities of the mind of man must henceforward be attributed to a loving God Who has left no reason to change or doubt anything in His Guide Book to eternal life. “Study to show thyself approved” (II Timothy 2:15) is a fair request for God to make of all of us it seems.

[The foregoing is a sanforized and freely paraphrased version of Dr. Keith L. Brooks’ editing of Dr. Ivan Panin’s work, the full text of which may still be available from: Book Fellowship – Box 164 – N. Syracuse, N.Y. – 13212. I personally think this is a dynamite testimony to the miraculous inerrancy of the Bible and hence to its credibility and trustworthiness from the first word the last. Stark evidence of such un-dreamed of precision of detail leaves no doubt that this same ineffably wonderful God would not use “doublespeak” when He used “Sun, stand thou still” et al.

The Writings Of Ivan Panin, 1918, 586 pp is the full reference; See also Panin’s The Last Twelve Verses Of Mark,

56 pp.; Number In Scripture, E.W. Bullinger, D.D., 7 printings from 1894-1978, is another good source….]

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment

Unveiling Another Bible Cover Up

The flat earth truth is not the only thing that has been covered from us in the Bible, there are many other topics, too. When you read the Bible carefully, it’s plain that the earth is flat and stationary. Well, too, about the lost tribes of Israel – it’s right in the Bible. Of course, the NWO says it’s “politically incorrect” but that is what they all say about all truth that sets up free.

The Lost Tribes Of Israel Found

Where did we come from? Where are we going? Were the tribes of Israel lost or did we just lose our identity in our migrations? God said looked unto the rock that you were hewed.

Download this video while you can.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Computer Generated Deception, part 8 (final)

Computer Generated Deception, part 8 (final)

More Unyielding Evidence of Flagrant Deceptions In The Measurement of Star Distances

Click to access computer-generate-deception-8.pdf

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment