by Mark Sargent
Look him up on YouTube
This clue looks into the inevitable design question below the surface, or more
specifically, how thick the flat earth design would need to be. To start, let’s
quickly recap the design features so far.
A basic dome structure, made up of advanced high density material thousands of
miles wide, and at least 100 miles in height. The ceiling of said structure being
projected upon by an ultra high definition system, using super LED technology
and a combination of 2D and 3D imaging to simulate all celestial bodies
including sun, moon stars, and so on. This ceiling is then protected by a scaling
decrease in temperature and oxygen levels to the point where human life isn’t
naturally sustainable above 4 miles.
The lower surface of the domed structure consists of an organic layout of
continents, grouped at the center, insuring that no land bridge exists to the outer
ring. This is then surrounded by hundreds of miles of salt water in order to limit
sea travel. The salt oceans are then adjusted with a scaling decrease in
temperature as the outer area is approached, to the point where salt water
freezes, forming icebergs, further reducing sea travel.
The outer ring is then elevated to a height of 10,000 feet, reducing oxygen
levels, and a buffer zone of 300 miles is created. This zone is devoid of all life
forms that could be used as food, further discouraging land travel.
That all sounds pretty good, but we left out one thing. Depth. Keeping human
beings away from the ceiling is easy, because it requires higher technology.
Protecting the outer ring is a little more difficult, but can be accomplished with
layers of negative reinforcement.
Protecting the actual common ground is a different challenge, because digging is
basic. Everyone knows how to use a shovel, and most construction requires a
generous amount of digging. In addition, natural resources such as coal, oil,
minerals, are harvested through large scale digging operations.
So it’s safe to say that any human population is going to be digging a lot of
holes, because it’s easy, and necessary to continue their way of life. That being
said, how thick would you need to make the flat earth model so that people
didn’t accidentally dig their way through?
You could use the same method as the outside barrier, and create a series of
undesirable layers, ending in a solid barrier, but the ever expanding increases in
general population would create an unnecessary risk. If the bottom of the flat
earth was composed of say an unbreakable material, this would peak the diggers
curiosity, and if repeated all over the world, would raise suspicions of design.
While a solid barrier works at the end of a frozen wasteland where no one is
venturing, or allowed, it doesn’t do much if it’s found in a mining quarry, or
someone’s backyard.
For that you need something that hasn’t been used up to this point, a scaling
increase in temperature, all the way to an ignition flashpoint, and then beyond.
Now you will jump in and say, well of course, we all know that there is molten
rock below the surface. We see it in volcanoes, and well, volcanoes!
Yes, yes you do. And we’ve all seen the cross section diagram of the globe earth
which shows ever brighter bands of molten structure and so on, which is why I
included the Wiki link below[10] that covers the official view of the earth
structure.
And I quote: “Scientific understanding of the internal structure of the Earth is
based on OBSERVATIONS of rock in outcrop, samples brought to the surface
from greater depths by volcanoes, analysis of seismic waves, measurements of
gravitational and magnetic fields and experiments with crystals at pressure and
temperatures characteristic of the Earth’s deep interior”.
In short? They have no clue on what’s below them. None. In fact, the deepest
holes ever drilled which I’ve also linked in the resources section only go down 8
miles. To repeat, no one has gone below 8 miles, anywhere. And every drilling
survey is the same, a scaling increase in temperature to the point where drill bits
stop working.
And you come back and say, but, Volcanoes! Yes there are volcanoes, holes in
the earth where molten rock is produced, under pressure I might add. Certainly
that can’t be artificially created. No? We can melt rock right now; it’s called a
smelting plant. What do you think your car is made out of, melted, reformed, and
polished rock.
We have the technology to do this, it all comes down to scale. Create a large set
of furnaces at say, 50 miles below the surface that can melt and pump, molten
rock. And you say, what would the furnaces be made out of? Oh I don’t know,
how about the same dome material than can withstand nuclear weapons?
So you take the molten rock, locate a few random access points on the surface,
and the rest comes naturally. Volcanoes also reinforce the earth structure model
that the molten rock goes all the way to the core, which then in turn reinforces
the globe model and then we’re back to where we are now. A smoldering globe
flying through space at high speeds that from a design standpoint, makes no
sense.
So how thick would the flat earth model floor need to be? Oh, for common use,
say, less than 100 miles, similar to the ceiling in scale. Large heat generators
placed in a pattern, a thin layer of molten rock 10-20 miles down, which is really
just a geologic pipe system to help with the generation of terrain.
And there you have it, an efficient way of discouraging all those digging humans
from reaching too far, combining a physical barrier with a mental one. 8 miles
down and you’re going to tell me what the entire core looks like?! Give me a
break!
So do some of your own research, and ask questions.
by Mark Sargent
Get his book on Amazon (Flat Earth Clues)
This clue covers the inevitable and sometimes frustrating question of why the
authority would go to all the trouble of hiding the flat earth. My hope here is to
show you different angles, and a progression of events, all of which lead to a
very changed world, both physically, and mentally.
To open we have to go way back to when the world was a much simpler place.
You had your five major religions including Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism,
Islam, and Christianity. Each of these groups had their own version of what is
known in Genesis as the firmament, or a flat, circular world enclosed by a solid
dome like barrier from where the creator (or creators) looked on.
I’m not going to explore all the subtle differences between the groups, suffice it
to say that it’s interesting that despite their differences that led to acts of horrible
violence between them, there was no real earth model debate.
So then around 500 years ago, the science community, led by Copernicus who
probably had a little help, introduced what we now know as the heliocentric, or
globe model of the world, which in turn changed the solar system, galaxy, and so
on.
The religions, seeing that this globe model was gaining popularity, feared a loss
in the fan base, so they all adapted their religions to include the globe model.
From their point of view, it was a small change from a circular to a globe world,
and really, in a few generations who would remember anyway?
So the churches, mosques, temples wrapped up their flat earth model in
metaphoric soft cloth, and put it in the drawer with the good silver for safe
keeping. Remember this because we’ll come back to it later.
And hundreds of years went by, with science promoting all the aspects of the
globe, and the religions promoting their beliefs upon this globe. The world kept
spinning, so to speak, and everyone was happy.
Then in the early part of the 1900’s you get this pesky explorer named Richard
Byrd. He has family money, all the right connections, and secures basically
unlimited funding and the government green light to probe every piece of unseen
territory there is. It was inevitable I guess, a young man who has an
unquenchable desire to see all that there is to see, and then granting him the tools
needed to accomplish this goal.
And he pulls a Truman and gets lucky, crossing the vast salt ocean, avoiding the
icebergs, arriving at the frozen coastline, and he keeps going. He was never
going to stop. One day after crossing hundreds of miles of high altitude ice and
snow, Admiral Byrd sees it. A barrier.
And to him, it is just A barrier, not THE barrier. He is but a tiny spec in front of
it. It stretches out on both sides as far as he can see, and straight up so far that he
can’t discover the beginning of the arc. The great explorer now has a new
challenge, finding the shape of this thing. It’s much like a blind man describing
an elephant. Until you feel out the whole thing, what do you really know?
If you look at the AE or Flat Earth overhead map, you see the problem. To even
determine the scope of the outer wall, you have to circle it. It would have taken
months, if not years. You could use a series of ships going in opposite directions,
or planes, but there are refueling stations that need to be built and so on. His task
was challenging to say the least. Admiral Byrd kept laying the groundwork of
the great discovery until his eventual death in 1957.
A year later, the United States and Russia found the upper edge. From there, the
math was easy, and moreover, you could actually see the real world. Then of
course there is the decision, or deception, depending on how you looked at it.
The authority made the call to hide the actual shape of where we live, then
sealed off the outer edge from prying eyes, and created the space program to not
only reinforce the globe model, but to control it.
There was really only one reason they cared about this, and it takes a while to
process, so let’s look at the immediate effects of actual disclosure, and work our
way up to the authority’s biggest fear.
For this exercise we’ll look at releasing the news today, instead of say 1958.
While 1958 would have been easier, it’s much more relevant and entertaining to
explain it in modern terms. We start with a press conference by, let’s say the
United Nations, who have discovered that the world is indeed enclosed in a
giant, high tech dome of unknown origin and age.
The public reacts with wonder and awe, trying to take in the sheer scope of this
announcement. Face book crashes, Twitter crashes, entire mobile networks
crash. It’s like hitting a bee hive with a sledgehammer. News organizations
around the world send teams to the outer edge to confirm the finding, and the
general public is glued to their media devices.
That’s the good news, the excitement, the revelation, the positive shock. Then
the bad news starts coming in waves, some of which you might not expect. The
first is the immediate disbanding of NASA and all other world space programs,
for obvious reasons. Most governments will secretly pardon these groups and
keep them immune from class actions lawsuits, the lawsuits themselves coming
from NASA investment groups, claiming fraud. Regardless, everyone at NASA
despite their good intentions is out of a job overnight.
And this is where you would say good! They deserve it, about time they stopped
lying to everyone. Oh but it doesn’t stop there, because every contractor and
subcontractor that are exclusively tied to NASA, they have to shut down as well.
Fine, a few thousand jobs lost. No big deal.
And the ripples continue to spread, some bigger than others. Observatories all
over the world close their doors, and the reasoning is this: If you’ve been
looking at the ceiling for decades and couldn’t tell it was a ceiling, then what
good are you?
Every university in the world that has an astronomy or astrophysics program,
well they don’t anymore. Stephen Hawking? His book writing days are over.
Carl Sagan? No more NOVA in syndication, I guarantee it. Those professors are
going to have to retool their skills, and be prepared to answer one giant question.
How did you now see it? Weren’t their clues? People start finger pointing, and it
will continue for years.
And still my fellow flat earthers will say, well hell, that doesn’t sound too bad.
So some nerds around the world lose their jobs, so what? You don’t get off that
easy, is what!
The finger pointing at the now defunct NASA will then turn to finger pointing at
the government, who directed the whole thing. This is where we run into some
dangerous ground, involving things like the Ark of the Covenant, the Holy Grail,
and the ring of power.
And you say, ya lost me, I was with you until you started bringing up religious
artifacts from movies. And you’re supposed to be lost. Of the five major
religions we mentioned earlier, those being Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism,
Islam, and Christianity, none have been able to produce a supernatural object
over the last 5000 years, and trust me, it would be beneficial to do so.
The Ark of the Covenant would benefit Judaism, the Holy Grail Christianity, and
the ring of power, well that benefits someone else, and maybe I’ll leave alone for
now. The point is that all religions are actively seeking their leverage against
science. You’ve heard of the division between church and state, well here it is,
advantage church. The barrier becomes a giant religious symbol, and since it is
backed by the big five, it also becomes universal.
The big five then go into their drawer with the good silver and pull out this belief
that was forgotten but not lost, and say, WE KNEW IT ALL ALONG, and
science lied to us! Temporarily, all religions unite against science, which has
been only moderately weakened by the removal of their astronomy and
astrophysics divisions.
But the public won’t care, because they will listen to the group shouting the
loudest, and no one yells louder than the church. They will scream with
righteous fury that the dome was built by OUR God, YOUR God, and the people
will turn to science and hear nothing but crickets. And that’s where the world
changes, because in times of great stress, the public will want words, and while
religion has no shortage of them, science simply is incapable of taking leaps of
faith.
I’ll take a glass half full approach and say that anyone listening to this is
probably an intelligent rational person, one who can make informed decisions
outside of the conventional doctrine. But for every one of you, there are
hundreds, if not thousands of mouth breathing troglodytes who will not walk, but
run to their respective house of religion and say: You were right about this, what
else can you teach me?
This is what fills the current authority with pause. The unknown response to that
question. Will religion take the high road and work with what remains of science
to discover the truth? It’s possible I suppose.
It’s also possible that religion will combine this technologically advanced
society with a revitalized and aggressive doctrine that then transforms daily life
into something that makes the book 1984 seem like a Saturday morning cartoon
show. I’m hoping that mankind will prove me wrong, but so far, that isn’t the
case.
So do some of your own research, and ask questions.
“We all know what genetically modified foods are. If it is a tomato, for example, it has only an outward resemblance to the fruit that was grown in our garden. But what is a genetically modified person or, if you will, a person with an edited genome? To what extent has the image of God remained intact in him?”
When making a choice whether to be vaccinated against COVID or not, it is important to be well informed on this issue both medically and religiously, says Bishop Porfiry.
Vicar of the Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia, vicar of the Solovetsky Spaso-Preobrazhensky Stavropigial Monastery of the Russian Orthodox Church, Bishop Porfiry (Shutov) named the main grounds for a Christian to base his decision on vaccination. The hierarch’s sermon of July 18 was published on the monastery’s YouTube channel.
The hierarch noted that before the introduction of compulsory vaccination against the coronavirus, “everyone really did decide for himself what was best for him. Now it is necessary to make that choice again and check again the grounds on which one can make this important decision for oneself. And what grounds can there be for a Christian that are truly meaningful and essential to us?”
According to him, one must necessarily take care of one’s health, a really great value, cherish and preserve it, and avoid illness. But those who doubt the healing power of the coronavirus vaccine, he noted, have good reason to do so, “because there really are questions about these drugs: there are unfinished trials, and the fact that people get sick repeatedly and often severely, and the side effects. All of that has to be taken into account. So a lot of people, also for the good of their health, think it’s better to abstain from these drugs for now.”
In deciding whether or not to vaccinate, it is important to be well informed on this issue both medically and religiously, the hierarch of the Russian Orthodox Church emphasized.
“Totally official information. The vaccine is a genetically engineered, high-tech product. It contains proteins of matrix RNA or DNA, these agents are built into the human genome, change it, modify it, edit it. And at this point, the Christian who is responsible for his salvation must stop. We all know what genetically modified foods are. If it is a tomato, for example, it has only an outward resemblance to the fruit that was grown in our garden. But what is a genetically modified person or, if you will, a person with an edited genome? To what extent has the image of God remained intact in him? And who can guarantee that this intervention has not caused irreversible damage to our image of God?” explained Bishop Porphyry.
In addition, he continued, there is official information about the presence of metal nanoparticles in the vaccine, that there is technology to influence the nervous system through them, and “that they are all built into the circuit of digital control.
“This raises the question: Has the person who has experienced these interventions really remained an autonomous and sovereign person, or has the center of control over our behavior been moved somewhere outside? But it is absolutely necessary for our salvation to remain human in the image of God. If such changes are made in human nature, will Christ, who came to save man who has sinned but not lost the image of God, find in us those who have been subjected to the interference of fallen man by his own fallen mind into these innermost depths of human nature?
If our whole eternal destiny depends on the resolution of this question, whether we will be Christ-like, whether our eternity will be in the light of the Blessed Trinity, or whether we will share the hellish places prepared for the devil and his angel, it is better to take the blow of a thousand lightnings than to see the meek face of God turned away from us. The fear of offending God drives out all other fears in the Christian heart. This is why Christian civilization has drawn red lines, beyond which one must never cross, interfering in the mysteries of this world, in the mysteries of God,” emphasized Bishop Porphyry.
Most Christians would object to this. Why? Because their church is not being persecuted. Many Christians also think that if you have rough going in your life, something is wrong; that Christians should have ‘smooth sailing.’ Well, that is not what the Bible says. If that was the case, why did the Prophets of old suffer? Why did all the Apostles suffer? Why did Christians that came after them suffer? The fact is, that those who call themselves Christians are not suffering is because what they believe is not a threat to the Beast System. That is why most churches have no problems with the government, either. Now, it’s time to hear what God has, through the Holy Bible.
Note: I can make some comments on this, but I’ll leave this post as it is.
by Mark Sargent
This clue covers the near perfect design of the flat earth model and will break
down some of the logic behind the decisions made. It sounds like a big task, and
it is, but to start, let’s look at something small, like this little guy (above).
Take an ordinary mouse, and put it into a glass cage. It doesn’t have to be a
mouse, it could be a snake, a lizard, an insect – it makes little difference for this
exercise. People identify with mice because they’re used to seeing them in lab
experiments. Mice also don’t have any sinister connotations. They’re seen as
relatively innocent and benign, the perfect test subjects as it were. I have yet to
meet anyone who has a bias against the lab mouse.
So the mouse goes into the box for the first time, and the reaction is always the
same. It explores its surroundings, and more importantly, tests the barrier around
it, probing for exits, or potential exits.
The mouse inspects every inch of its new glass home, and at some point, settles
into the acceptance that the walls are indeed solid and that it may be there a
while. Every so often, it will repeat the process, again checking the boundaries
of the cage, just in case something had changed.
What it doesn’t do, is act like it would in the wild, because it realizes that it’s in a
form of captivity. The glass box doesn’t even remotely resemble its natural
environment. You could put this box in the middle of the forest and the mouse
may feel slightly better about its situation, but it still knows that it’s been trapped
against its will, and will settle into a non-native lifestyle.
You could take all the other small animals that could be substituted for a mouse,
the snake, the lizard, the insect, it makes no difference, the result will invariably
be the same, repeated probing for escape routes, then acceptance.
Take the same animal, and now put it into the middle of a 100 mile square
wildlife preserve, surrounded on all sides by a similar type of glass enclosure.
The creature doesn’t even bother to rush to the sides of the preserve and start
testing the boundaries, mostly because it is out of visual range.
It could be days, or even weeks before it even encounters a single fence. The
animals’ routine is spent doing what it normally would do. It eats, it sleeps, and
it breeds. It does everything that it would naturally do in the wild. If one day the
animal approaches the fence, there might be some curiosity, but any anxiety is
quickly resolved by just turning around and heading back into the vast expanse
from which it came.
The fence does not pose a potential problem for the animals in the preserve,
because it is so small compared to the expanse they live in, and dwelling on it
doesn’t hold any interest. We’re assuming here that the fence is high enough to
discourage flying creatures as well, deep enough to stop burrowing classes, and
if you want, reaches the floor of any nearby bodies of water, stopping any clever
aquatic types.
The point here is that all creatures great and small, inside a giant wildlife
preserve, when encountering the fence, wouldn’t care. They would all in their
own way, just shrug and move on with their lives.
However, if you take a human, male or female, regardless of education or
nurturing, and put them in the exact same wildlife sanctuary, the response would
be quite different. When the human approaches the glass fence, they don’t see it
as a minor distraction. They pause, they wonder, and more importantly, they ask
questions, either internally or amongst others.
Why is this fence here? How far does it reach? Can I dig underneath, or climb
over, or go around it? These questions continue in the way you might imagine,
but eventually, a bigger question jumps to the top of the list; who built the fence?
It is this that which changes not only the type of questions being asked, but how
the human being (or beings) look at their world. The giant wildlife preserve
suddenly gets smaller. Each new fence border discovered starts to artificially
constrict the expanse, even though the dimensions haven’t changed.
Before long, the preserve, their home, loses some of its relevance. The fence is a
reminder of the unknown. It provokes fear and endless speculation within the
human. Given enough time, the importance of the preserve continues to be
reduced, especially in relation to the fence, and the reason why it’s so engrossing
for the human is simple; it’s THERE. It’s real. They can see it, and maybe even
touch it.
Adding more humans to the equation increases the disparity of the situation by
orders or magnitude. Have you seen the fence? Do you know how long it’s been
here? Have you ever known anyone that’s been outside it? It’s older than us. Who
is responsible for the fence? What can we do to appease the group that created
it? You can see what this might lead to.
A long lasting group hysteria would entrench itself within the population, grab
hold and never let go. The fence is bigger, older, and wiser than they are. It
humbles them, it angers them, and it is forever. It is their proof of a higher
power. Maybe not God, but certainly “God-like“.
No civilization, regardless of technology, discipline, or age, would be able to
cope with the existence of it. For the human psyche, there are just too many
questions that go unanswered. Life would never be able to progress normally.
To summarize, a garden variety wildlife preserve would work for 99.99 percent
of all the worlds’ life forms. For human beings however, you would need to
make some modifications, or really just one big one.
So let’s take a look at a few examples of how this could be accomplished, and
from there expand it. The first failed example can be seen in the 1998 movie
“Dark City”. This is a good starting point to get you in the right mindset. The
premise here is that an advanced race creates a small flat earth area, complete
with the traditional dome. The design however is initially flawed, in that they
built the city all the way to the outer edge, leaving no room for error.
To compensate for this, they altered the memories of the human population on a
regular basis, therefore repressing any long term investigations. However in
movies there are always anomalies, like the police officer who realizes that even
though he remembers visiting a place called shell beach, there is no way to reach
it, because shell beach is outside the flat world, and never existed. He just keeps
going around the circular city that has no exits. In the end another man, the hero
of the movie, makes it to edge, steals the advanced races power, and creates an
ocean, which really should have been there in the first place.
Move from there to a movie released only four months later called “Truman
Show[8]”. Inevitably all flat earthers have to take a hard look at this movie from
a technical point of view. The movie follows the same type of lines as Dark City,
but in a much more relatable premise, that of a giant television stage built so that
the outside world can watch a person go through his life without any knowledge
that he is living inside a flat world, surrounded by a physical dome.
This movie is interesting on several levels, including construction. Using their
existing model of a small town bordered on one side by a large lagoon and
wilderness, and the other a seemingly expansive ocean, while better than Dark
City, still had its flaws. For one, it was less than 20 miles across, and even
though Truman’s desire to explore was repressed, there was still a chance that
he would venture to the outer edge, which is where the movie ended.
But for the most part, it worked. Truman believed the entire scenario because he
was born into it and then lived 30+ years without any reason to doubt where he
was, which could be said for any of us. If it wasn’t for the “and we’ll say movie
mistakes” that the studio fell victim to, then the show would have never ended.
And this then raises hypothetical scenarios, like, how many kids like Truman
could you have raised inside that dome? 10? 50? Now logistically you can see
how it might be problematic in keeping tabs on that may kids, especially as they
got older, but with enough slight of hand, it could be possible.
A fictional situation just like that was made into the 2004 movie “The
Village[9]”, and even though it turned into one of those M Night Shyamalan plot
twist things, the premise was very feasible. A wealthy group of idealists buy a
large parcel of land in an existing wildlife preserve, create a small town from the
1800’s, and raise children there. They pay off government officials to keep
planes far away, and spread a myth that monsters live in the forest.
As far as the kids are concerned, they actually are living in a small Pennsylvania
town in the 1800’s, and being born into it, why wouldn’t they? If the story
continued, eventually the elders that founded the town would all pass away,
leaving the children to pass on the legacy, free from any burden of guilt that their
world was not what it appeared to be.
And keep in mind this was done with very little land manipulation and NO
DOME.
This then circles back to how many actors the fictional Truman show really
needed to hire. Other than the leads who did product placement, the rest of the
town could actually just live their lives like anyone else, use phone lines to call
outside, go to restaurants, watch television at home, and so on. But again, I
digress.
Assuming the technology was possible, how many people like Truman could
you keep in a dome the size of say, a state? Hundreds of miles across? Probably
thousands. If you kept expanding the size of the dome to a few thousand miles,
well then you’re talking millions, but when it gets that big, something interesting
happens. You don’t need the actors anymore. Start it up like the Village, and
within just a few generations, everyone is oblivious, and you can leave them to
their own devices. Starting to sound familiar?
In fact, the larger you make the enclosed world, the less micro managing needs
to be done. It gets easier as it scales. This brings us back to the missing
modification you need for the human race. To keep the storylines consistent, and
remove all the hocus pocus of monsters in the woods, or that you can’t get to
Shell Beach, you place in gradual negative reinforcement, one that creates an
illusion of choice.
Say for example that Truman went out in the sailboat the same as before, but this
time the dome was twice the size, and the simulated ocean far larger. How far
would he travel before getting hungry, thirsty, or tired? The movie ending is then
in doubt.
And if you compare this scenario with where you are now, then you start to see
it. Look at the flat earth map again. Continents grouped in the center, surrounded
in all directions by hundreds of miles of SALT water. Think about how much
farther ancient ships would have traveled if you could drink what you were
sailing on. As you move closer to the edge the temperature starts taking a nose
dive, and then you start seeing icebergs. If that doesn’t stop you then you run
into what we call Antarctica, which is a steep climb two miles up, with no plant
life or indigenous livestock animals.
And if you had the where with all to make it that far, you would still have
hundreds of miles of endless ice and snow. It’s easy to see why so few people
have gone the distance.
Compare this to the upper ceiling, which is much easier to maintain. You simply
decrease the oxygen rates so that every 1000 feet up it gets more difficult to
breathe. This slows down exploration over mountains ranges, and discourages
limited control flight, such as balloons. Also keep in mind that the dome itself
doesn’t have to be that high in relation to the outer ring. With commercial
aircraft capping out at 10 miles, and rockets less than 400, the dome would
actually look more like stadium roof, depending on how you wanted to display
things like the sun, moon, and stars.
An enclosed world with these types of safeguards would be able to sustain an
unknowing population for say what, 4500 years? Then you artificially introduce
a globe model into the scientific community before the civilization technology
reaches a point that could lead to discovery.
And 500 years later, here we are. A civilization inside an amazing structure,
doing what we would naturally do, while the authority stands by the gate and
fears the consequences if we ever found out for ourselves.
So do some of your own research, and ask questions.
by Mark Sargent
This clue looks into the USGS, otherwise known as the map makers of the world, and a few surprising things that they and others have in common with the flat earth idea.
All the reference links are provided either in footnotes to the page, or in the
resources section at the end of the book, and I encourage you to check them out.
For those of you outside of the United States, USGS stands for United States
Geological Survey, a scientific branch of the US Government. Formed in 1879,
and with the help of the ever expanding American Empire, they quickly became
the premier map makers of the known world. Currently, they have around 9,000
employees and an annual budget of over a billion dollars a year.
They also have extensive science departments covering biology, geography,
geology, hydrology and many programs tied to them. Their motto since the
1990’s has been “science for a changing world”, and I’m going to show you how
true that really is.
What does this large, really boring government group have to do with the flat
earth? To understand that you have to look into their origins, which is in
geography. To do this you’ll need to look at a source that specializes in maps.
There are maps you can see in Wikipedia, but there are others you can reference
as well.
The Wiki list of map projections[4] isn’t much to look at as a whole, although
there a number of interesting takes on the world view. Not only do they have just
about every perspective when it comes to the land we live on, but some detailed
information on where the map originated, including name type, the origin or
creator, and the year the map perspective was proposed.
Now some of these will be very familiar, especially the ones that you would see
on your classroom wall. There are a number of variations here, but the one that
has been debated on recently would be this one, the Gall Peters, which
accurately shows the size difference between the continents, the most obvious
clue being that the white continent of Greenland is actually tiny compared to
Africa. But I digress.
If you keep going down through all the different shapes, you’ll get into circular
maps, but only one of these is a top down perspective that shows the continents
in the center, surrounded by an unbroken ring of ice. In Wiki, it’s called the
Azimuthal Equidistant[5], and just to make it easier I’m going to abbreviate and
call it AE for short. The AE Map is below:
Why is this map so interesting? Well if you’re looking at the Wiki page you’ll
spot a few reasons. The first is that in the notes section this map. And I quote
“Used by the USGS in the National Atlas of the US”. It also mentions that it is
used as the emblem of the United Nations. Of all the maps on this screen, it is
the only one that references a group of any kind.
And if you keep this page open and navigate over to the flat earth section of
Wiki, you’ll notice towards the bottom of the page a similar map. I’ve
referenced it here and you can tell quite easily it’s identical, but not referenced
or linked as the AE model.
To make things even stranger, we go back to the USGS model and you see that it
was first proposed 1000 years ago and you may think, well, that’s a bad link, so
you compare it with the person who proposed it and you get this guy, Al Biruni.
Who was Al Biruni? Well he lived around 1000 years ago and was considered
one of the greatest scholars of his era, schooled in multiple sciences.
Have you ever heard of him? I hadn’t. Maybe it’s multiple bad references in
Wiki. Well no, because NASA knows who he is and named this moon crater
after him. So why is the USGS using a version of the world map designed by a
1000 year old Persian scientist? Because it’s correct, that’s why.
So to be clear, let’s compare them again, the United Nations flag, the USGS
official map of the earth, and the flat earth model. All identical, but one isn’t
recognized and instead ridiculed as an outdated look at the world.
And this is one of those political quandaries that the authority gets stuck in. The
short version is this. The government is on the same page as the flat earth, but
they can’t admit it, even in confidence. We know the earth isn’t flat, “but it
really is”. We know you use the same map as we do, but ours is just an image,
and anyone who says differently is obviously crazy.
Makes you wonder how long the USGS had been using that model as an official
reference. The UN started using it for their logos in 1945, and then made some
final adjustments in 1946. And the UN flag also raises a few questions like, why
isn’t Antarctica represented on the map? Is it supposed to be assumed in the
outer circle, or perhaps the spiky olive branches on the outside? They don’t
mention it anywhere online.
Flag of the United Nations
This is what I like to focus on, the gaps, the holes in the plot, the unanswered
questions. The USGS using the same map as the flat earth, but not saying why, not
recognizing it, or that you can’t link the very same image from the flat earth
Wiki back to the actual AE definition of the projection.
The authority figured out in the 1950’s all of the borders of our enclosed world,
and have done a great job hiding it over the decades. But the world’s a complex
place, and there are clues out there just lying around. I think it’s time you saw
some of them.
So do some of your own research, and ask questions.
by Mark Sargent
This clue revolves around one of the most remarkable men you may have never
heard of, Richard E. Byrd and his relationship with Antarctica, and the secretive
missions he carried out there until his dying day.
Some of you have followed the legend of Richard Byrd through the hollow earth
theory. We aren’t going to be covering any hollow earth in this chapter, but
instead focus on the man and his involvement with the South Pole.
The readers digest version of Richard Byrd is as follows: Born in 1888, he
became an American naval officer who specialized in feats of exploration. He
was a pioneering American aviator, Medal of Honor winner, polar explorer,
aircraft navigator, expedition leader in the worst environments in the world, and
the youngest Admiral in the history of the navy.
In addition, his list of awards takes up several pages in Wikipedia, including
three ticker tape parades in his honor. In short, he was Indiana Jones on steroids.
Some people will say that Roy Chapman Andrews was the real Indiana Jones,
and you might be right, but Richard Byrd beat Indy six days a week and twice on
Sunday.
I mention all his accolades to paint a picture of credibility and trust. The
governments of the US and the world trusted his judgment and leadership, and
they took advantage of every chance they had to put him in charge of special
missions.
The first large scale mission was an expedition to Antarctica in 1928. This was
noteworthy because even though he had just flown over the North Pole in 1926,
all expeditions from 1928 on were focused on the South. The expedition lasted
two years, and during it, at the age of 41, was promoted to Admiral.
His second Antarctic expedition ran from 1933 to 1935, and his third from 1939
to 1940. While in Antarctica he also was an advisor for other countries who had
their own expeditions, including England, France, Germany, and building off
previous countries expeditions from Belgium, Japan and Sweden.
He then helped lead US Navy fleet operations in World War 2, was present
during the Japanese surrender in 1945, but then something strange
happened….He went back to Antarctica.
Now some of you aren’t surprised, because he’d been there since 1928, and I
agree with you, it’s the how that’s interesting here.
His fourth trip to Antarctica wasn’t an expedition, it was a military operation
called Operation “High Jump”.
Commanding an entire aircraft carrier group that included 13 support ships,
Admiral Byrd led 4,700 men to the South Pole, for reasons that are still shrouded
to this day.
Some say they were chasing the remaining Nazi fleet, even though Germany had
surrendered a full year earlier. Others say that there was a Nazi base established
in Antarctica during the war, when Admiral Byrd was absent. None of these
theories are important for this clue.
What we do know is that the US had sent an excessively large military force to
the ice, all under the guise of peaceful intentions.
During this operation, Admiral Byrd told a Chile newspaper this:
The most important result of his observations and discoveries is the potential
effect that they have in relation to the security of the United States. The fantastic
speed with which the world is shrinking – recalled the admiral – is one of the
most important lessons learned during his recent Antarctic exploration. I have to
warn my compatriots that the time has ended when we were able to take refuge
in our isolation and rely on the certainty that the distances, the oceans, and the
poles were a guarantee of safety.
After the operation, Admiral Byrd toured the states, and gave interviews. The
most interesting of which as a national television show in 1954 called the
Longines Chronoscope, a horrible name, but a decent show. I’ve added the
transcript to the end of this chapter and put the reference link below[3] and in the
resources, so that you can watch it for yourself.
During this television interview, he first spoke of an area beyond the South Pole
as large as the United States, which no one had set foot on yet. He then went on
to say that there would probably be expeditions year after year because the US
government had really become interested.
The interviewers then probed as to why the interest in the South, when any
perceived military threat from Russia (keep in mind this was 1954) would be
from the North. He went on to say that it was the most valuable and important
place in the world for science. It involved the future of the nation, an untouched
reservoir of untapped resources, including coal, oil, minerals, and uranium.
He added that at the time of this interview, there were seven nations currently
engaged in Antarctica including Russia, Australia, Argentina, Chile, and New
Zealand.
During the interview the Admiral talked about planning the next military
mission to Antarctica. It was called Operation Deep Freeze, and ran from 1955
to 1956.
The mission was completed, and he supposedly returned home.
Now this is where you come in and say, so what, and normally I’d agree with
you, except for what happened next. Nothing happened next. The missions just
suddenly stopped, and that was it! No other expeditions, military or otherwise
were conducted on the continent, ever!
Then a treaty was put in place banning any country from doing basically
anything. The end.
And if you’re wondering what you’re missing, it’s this:
Admiral Byrd goes on television, says that this massive body of land, most of
which sits on a plateau 2 miles high, is rich with every resource you could ever
want, ENERGY rich, pristine, with no indigenous population or plant life, and
every country that has sent teams is ready to carve it up like a big turkey, not to
mention there’s a expanse of land larger than the United States they haven’t even
LOOKED at yet, and out of the blue everyone just calls the whole thing off?
There are no environmentalists in 1959; this is the land of Diner food and 20
cent gas!
I’m calling total BS on this one. The dollar value of the initial resource find
would have fueled armies of greedy companies. So what happened? They found
the edge that’s what, and the last thing they were going to do was let
unsupervised companies near it, regardless of the money. Even if hundreds of
miles away, you couldn’t allow resource corporations even into a safe area, and
then years down the road as they expanded, tell them, oh, sorry, you can’t go
beyond this point. When the companies ask why, what would they tell them?
And now the interior of Antarctica is off limits, with no revisions until the year
2041. You can take tours of the outer islands, but there is a hidden line, enforced
by the military, that you will not be able to cross.
Because the interior is actually the exterior edge. It’s there, it’s hidden, and it’s
protected.
The earth you live on is flat.
So do some of your own research, and ask questions.
Transcript – Admiral Byrd interview
I – Interviewer (Frank Knight)
AB – Admiral Byrd
I: Our very distinguished guest for this evening, is Admiral Richard E Byrd. The
North Pole used to be a no mans land, but these are the days when, by buying a
ticket on a commercial airliner, you can fly across the North Pole and drink a
cocktail at the same time. In only three score or more years ago, about 35 years
ago, our guest tonight, found out whether there was any land north of the North
American continent. He made that first discovery flight, and I must say that
Admiral Byrd, our guest tonight, is not only our greatest living explorer, but he’s
been an inspiration to countless Americans.
Admiral Byrd, you’ve been to both the North Pole and the South Pole. Is there
any unexplored land left on this earth that might appeal to adventurous young
Americans?
AB: Yes, there is. Not up around the North pole because it’s getting crowded up
there now because they’re finding out its really useable, not only to live in, but
militarily. But strangely enough, there’s left in the world today, an area as big as
the United States, that’s never been seen by human beings, and that’s beyond the
pole on the other side of the South pole, from middle America.
And I think it’s quite astonishing, that there should be an area
as big as that, unexplored, so there’s a lot of adventure left down at the bottom of
the world.
I: Admiral, an expedition to which you are the advisor is now en route, what is
that expedition doing?
AB: Well, that’s the icebreaker “Adtka”, and it’s a reconnaissance expedition
that’s going down to the South Pole area to make certain observations, and look
for some bases. They will be back in April, and report back, and upon the
information we get from that undertaking, we will base the bigger expedition
that is to follow.
I: Is that very definitely planned?
AB: That is being planned right now. So I’m willing to say to you that there will
be a number of expeditions that will follow year after year at the bottom of the
world, because the government has really become interested.
I: Well Admiral Byrd I can understand how everyone is interested in the North
pole, because it’s so near our greatest challenger, Soviet Russia. But why this
interest in the bottom of the world. Nobody lives down there, is there?
AB: No, it’s pretty cold. There is only one permanent resident, and that’s the
emperor penguin, the little ones live further north.
I’ll tell you one reason they are interested, it’s by far the most important and
valuable place left in the world for science. That’s where the scientific groups
from all over the world are interested.
But more important than that, it has to do with the future of the nation, and those
to come after us, even during your lifetime, because it happens to be an
untouched reservoir of natural resources, and as the world shrinks with ever
increasing acceleration, far flung places which we used to think were useless,
like the North pole, and no mans land, become very useful. The bottom of the
world, will be important, not only to us, but to our allies.
I: I was going to ask you, does it have military importance?
AB: It has some. Now as the world shrinks, it will continue to shrink with ever
increasing acceleration, thus bringing these places closer, and in the future, and I
can see a time when it will become very very important strategically.
I: Has the development of air power increased the strategic
importance of places like the South Pole?
AB: Very much so, very much so. Even now, if anything happened, and we lost the Panama Canal, we would have to control the islands just North of Antarctica,
which are a part, of Antarctica.
I: Admiral you speak of the resources of Antarctica, what are they? What are the
natural resources there?
AB: Well, we’ve found enough coal within 180 miles of the South Pole, in a
great ridge of mountains that’s not covered in snow, enough to supply to whole
world for quite a while. That’s the coal, now there is evidence of many other
minerals, we’re pretty sure there is oil, that coal shows the bottom of the world,
now by far the coldest spot in the world where that coal is, gets to 100 below
zero in the winter. It was once tropical. So we think there is oil there, and there is
evidence, probably uranium.
I: Is it any secret, is there uranium there that would be the only thing practical to
actually go after I suppose. Everything else would be economically unfeasible
wouldn’t it?
AB: Well, as we recklessly expend our resources, the time will come, when we’ll
have to go after that stuff down there. You know I avoided what you said about
uranium, I’m not sure; I don’t want to fight over the Antarctic.
I: Is there a competition among other nations as to trying to get information
about Antarctica and to possibly secure some of these resources?
AB: Well, yes. There are now several nations very much interested. Russia is
interested tremendously that I am sure. Australia has an expedition down there,
the Argentines, Chile, New Zealand, Britain, and so on. Now you can understand
those people being interested because they live down there, the New Zealanders,
the Argentines, the Chileans, and the Australians, and so, we don’t do much
about claiming anything.
I: Admiral, you make it sound crowded. Are there that many
Expeditions down there or in route there?
AB: Well you know, as I said, it’s the most peaceful place in the world, but I
don’t think it will be for long because of this intense interest on the part of other
nations and this nation.
#flatearthclues, mark sargent, #admiralbyrd,
by Mark SargentThis is part of a series of clues that can help you get your head around both the
design of the flat earth system we live in, and who has been involved in the
deception to hide it from you.
The clue you have to look at is built upon another conspiracy that has been
around for decades, namely the space program. Most of those watching this are
aware of the varying theories revolving around NASA, the Apollo program, the
space shuttle, the international space station, and so on.
The clue itself isn’t based on one of these highly debated topics, but the lack of
one, more specifically, motion pictures based on actual events.
This, like others in the series, is something you can check out for yourself.
Everything you need to reference this is online. To begin, think of all the movies
involving space travel that you’ve seen in your lifetime.
You’ll start with the obvious, Star Wars, Star Trek, Alien, just to name a few. In
fact if you go through your own personal list, you could probably come up with
over 100 different off world movies without breaking much of a sweat. This part
is easy.
For the second group, try to come up with space movies that aren’t fantasy
based. You’ll get a list that has Red Planet, Gravity, Mission to Mars, 2001,
things like that. These films will usually take on a not so distant future theme
and where we could be down the road, and it’s still a pretty good sized list.
These first two groups of films are encouraged by the authority, because they
reinforce the globe model view through assumption. The entertainment system
demands that the globe view and solar system concept is a given, therefore, the
actual world view must also be true.
Or to put it another way, if you are using your suspension of disbelief as you
watch a movie like, say, Gravity, then subconsciously you are reinforcing the
movie right on top of the real world.
The more of these movies you watch and enjoy, the more the lines blur between
what you want to believe and what you actually know. Watch enough movies
about Mars, and you will be less astonished when NASA announces an actual
mission to Mars. Same with the moon, other solar systems, and so on.
Releasing the movie “2001, a Space Odyssey” in 1968, right before the actual
moon missions, was no accident. It took the greatest director of the time 5 years
to make and several people who saw the theatre screenings claim that many
military groups were listed in the credits, only to be removed years later.
But 2001 is just a side note of this clue. For those who really want to dig into
Stanley Kubrick’s hidden vision, I highly recommend the documentary “Room
237”[1]. A link to it is below, and also in the resources section at the end.
Now you are aware of the first two groups of space films. There are those that
contain generous amounts of fantasy, and those who try to paint our near future.
These two groups are easy to find.
The third group is the challenge, and again, that’s where things get interesting.
The moon missions concluded in 1972, and even though it’s still considered the
greatest achievement by mankind, no fact based movies were made regarding it
until “The Right Stuff” was released in 1983. Now you might say that it had only
been 11 years and maybe it was tough to get the rights, and so on, but that’s not
what made the film interesting.
The movie ran extremely long for 1983, coming in at three hours and 12
minutes. It was an exhaustive look at the astronaut selection process, the
competition, and the training facility itself, but when the credits rolled thee hours
later, chronologically, they had only gotten to the low earth orbit missions. Just
for fun, Google the right stuff movie and see how many spacecraft you can find.
It won four academy awards, and did a great job at the box office, but the Apollo
missions were never touched.
The only other major motion picture that involved the actual moon program was
Apollo 13 in 1995, a full 12 years later. Apollo 13 only covered a single moon
orbit, with no landing or close up reference to the previous missions below them.
And after 1995, that was it. Nothing.
Hollywood is known for leaving no stone unturned with reboots and sequels to
nearly everything, yet in almost 60 years, there has never been a single moon
mission movie based on actual events. Hundreds of science fiction films
referencing it, everything from Superman to the Transformers, but literally
nothing that covers the moon surface. Six complete moon missions involving
multiple vehicles, moon buggies, playing golf, and no one wants to touch it.
Now to be fair, there was a TV miniseries in 1998 covering the subject. It was
produced by Tom Hanks who got involved after starring in Apollo 13. There has
been no professional production of any kind since then. Again, just for fun,
Google from earth to the moon TV series and see what you find.
The why is easy, and the clue revealed. If Hollywood makes a movie about the
moon landings, and it’s indistinguishable from the real thing, then how do you
know which is real? It raises some subtle questions involving stage technique,
and how long they have been in place. If Hollywood could fake it now, then
when did they first have the ability?
There is one other movie which stands out, and I mention it because I can’t
believe it ever got made. It is Capricorn One. The film’s plot involved the faking
of a Mar’s mission and how it could be accomplished. In short, it’s part of the
conspiracy world bible. I highly recommend it and the link is below[2] (and also
in the resources section).
To summarize, all space movies are encouraged by the authority, except for the
ones that are based on actual accounts. Those are not allowed. The moon
program has been buried in entertainment because the moon cannot be reached.
It’s either outside the barrier, or just a highly rendered image, like any planet you
see when entering a video game. The world is FLAT, and this is just one clue.
So do some of your own research, and ask questions!
Christian Flat Earth Ministry 