Uncensored Truth About Nuclear Weapons

https://real-truth-seekers.com/nuclear-hoax-nukes-do-not-exist/#

.

Nuclear Weapons Hoax

Note: With CGI technology, false flags and crises actors/actresses, it would be easy for one side to claim that such-and-such city was hit by a nuke. Or, it could be a real strike but the damage done was by carpet bombing by conventional weapons. Such was the case Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They were whipped out but not with a nuclear bomb but with conventional weapons.

Source:

By Gina Flores

Editor at NoFakeNews

For many years we have been told nuclear weapons have been stockpiled by various superpower countries. We have all been exposed to the paradigm that promotes the idea that nuclear weapons have made the world a far safer place even though these horrific devices could theoretically wipe out millions of lives in a few seconds. We’ve been told nuclear weapons are a deterrent to other potentially dangerous enemies of the United States and its allies and that they ultimately prevent wars and allow peace on earth to flourish.

Is it possible that what we have been taught about this subject is based on establishment lies?

After it was developed, the atomic bomb was allegedly dropped on Japan twice in the 1940’s. The bombs reportedly brought a quick end to World War II. The technology was never used again in any war although the threat of nuclear weapons against humanity and the planet has been publicized ad nauseum.

The only other evidence of atomic weapons being used in history has come in the form of highly secretive government tests. All of these tests have had limited government witnesses and many have been conducted underground or underwater. All of these tests could have been performed with the use of conventional bombs. TNT could have been used to fabricate any A-Bomb test. And yes, conventional bombs can and do produce the classic mushroom clouds that we routinely associate with atomic bombs.

In addition, the continuous threat of nukes being detonated by terrorists has been so overplayed in Hollywood movie productions throughout the years that people are now programmed to believe it’s only a matter of time before one of these devices will be used against a highly populated city. Yet there have been zero nukes used by crazy terrorists anywhere in the world. This fact alone is more than a little strange.

There are anonymous government insiders who claim the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by conventional fire bombings and not by atomic weapons. There are some researchers who claim atomic bombs are impossible to manufacture.

The buildings that were left intact and the lack of radiation found in Hiroshima and Nagasaki seem to support this claim.

Israel is purported to have a huge inventory of 400 nuclear weapons at their disposal and yet they have never detonated one device in the direction of their Arab neighbors. These are the same Arab neighbors they despise. Are they bluffing?

With so many unstable countries and crazy terrorist groups allegedly in existence, and so many nuclear weapons seemingly at their disposal or available for sale, how is it possible that not one nuclear incident has ever occurred?

What other amazing technology was revealed long ago and has never been used again, although we are constantly reminded of the accomplishment? The moon landings of course; another hoax of epic proportions.

Do the world leaders of certain countries really walk around with nuclear suitcases and corresponding launch codes? Do nuclear weapons actually exist? Probably not.

Before you write all of this off as a crazy conspiracy theory, think for a minute about how much leverage certain countries possess over others because of their claimed nuclear arsenals. What if there are zero nukes in existence in the entire world?

Think of all the military spending that’s taken place with regards to nuclear programs. And don’t forget about all the money that’s been budgeted by countries to protect their infrastructures from incoming nuclear weapons.

Just as the elites have lied about space technology and visiting the moon, there’s a damn good chance they’re lying about the existence of atomic weapons. They have lied about most things people have been taught are real.

Making Up The H-Bomb Myth

Note: When we hear the NWO saying that nuclear war is unthinkable – because of mutual annihilation, is a perfect cover-up. When people are told that the exposing and the following effects of radiation will kill millions of people, they accept that infeasibility of such a war being waged. So, but it will not stop the media saying “we are close to a nuclear war” in order to scare the living daylights out of people. With this perfect cover-up they can keep the myth of the non-existence of such weapons. But since the people would be scared to death, they would accept any draconian law – even permanent lockdowns – as this would be better than death itself. Thus, it would be the perfect way to instil permanent fear in the people.

Psalm 23:4 Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me.

Source:

If we assume A bombs never worked, why go on to invent H-Bombs too? Well….

It had occurred to me that perhaps Groves and the others realized that they had gone too far in promoting their imaginary atomic bomb as a wonderful weapon. The general public began thinking up a lot of good uses for it.

During Vietnam, people said, “Why don’t they just drop the bomb on them?” And even during the Iraq invasion, people said, “Why don’t they just nuke them?” And why be afraid of a weapon that only you possessed?

Realizing that the public might start demanding the use of the atomic bomb, which of course couldn’t be realized because it didn’t exist, they had to think up reasons not to use the bomb. So I can imagine a four prong method:

1) Promote this radiation stuff, that drifted with the wind, so that an atomic war could never be localized, but affected everyone around earth.

2) Promote the ‘brotherhood of man’ in all the Christian churches, so that white Christians would have some reservations about bombing someone halfway around the world. (I don’t think this has worked so well, really.)

3) ‘Leak’ the plans for the imaginary weapon to the USSR and other places. Develop Mutually Assured Destruction. So the weapon isn’t yours alone anymore.

4) Juice the weapons up to such a size, and say there are so many of them, and talk about how many times over the earth could be destroyed.

Thus making nuclear war ‘unthinkable’.

Very ingenious point, worth repeating. At the time, late 50s/ early 60s, Bertrand Russell was saying something like ‘… modern science has made it inevitable that all must live or all must die.’ This seems an odd claim, since hardly any countries were supposed to have the things. But if there’s huge destruction and radiation, and moreover if shelters are stated to be more or less impractical, then neighbours and other countries get harmed, too. Also it made it necessary to have leaks to the ‘Russians’, i.e. Edomites controlling the Soviet Union, which of course is the sort of thing Edomites do habitually on auto-pilot. It also made it necessary to oppose Senator Joseph McCarthy and generally agitate in favour of supposed spies – if the issue really had been that serious, it’s hard to imagine anyone being lax about it. (Similar thing with AIDS of course).

Russell is now known to have been fed information from British official sources, and it’s hard to know how much of it was Russell giving his own views, and Russell trimming to e.g. suit his view of world government. The info to him must have been rather secret – Denis Healey says in his autobiography that he visited Russell to quiz him on nuclear issues, but wasn’t impressed, suggesting various branches were doing their own things.