Under Trump in his first term was insane, and in 2020 alone, government spending was nearly $7 trillion, and the deficit was well over $3 trillion; no curbing of inflation evident. How do you bring down inflation with spending like this? You can’t!
by Craig D
With all the debate surrounding the tariffs imposed by Donald Trump and their potential consequences for American consumers, it’s worth considering a better alternative. Instead of relying on tariffs, the government should focus on creating an environment where American businesses can thrive and compete without artificial barriers.
To make domestically produced goods more affordable, the government must take the following steps:
Many companies have shut down or moved overseas because of these burdens. Rather than using tariffs to force companies to manufacture domestically, we should allow them to import freely and let consumers decide what they want. If people prefer domestically made goods, businesses will naturally adjust to meet demand.
Right now, many Americans buy cheaper imported products simply because they cannot afford higher-priced domestic alternatives. This affordability crisis stems from excessive taxation, inflation caused by reckless government spending, and personal debt burdens. Imposing tariffs will only make things worse, further raising costs for those already struggling.
Tariffs do not solve the root issues; they only mask the symptoms of an unhealthy economic system. If we address the real causes—government overreach, excessive taxation, and a broken monetary system—market forces will naturally correct themselves.
Additionally, using tariffs to “punish” trading partners only creates hostility between nations. Trade imbalances exist due to supply and demand, not unfair practices. Penalizing a free market goes against economic logic and fosters unnecessary tensions.
Ultimately, the path to real economic prosperity lies in returning to principles of economic freedom and responsible governance. As a Christian, I believe that aligning our nation with God’s laws will bring true prosperity. If we embrace these principles, there will be no need for tariffs, and we will witness a new era of economic strength and stability—the true Golden Age.
Trump News 7 March 2025
The Democrats are really demented. Check this out. Maybe Donald Trump will, by Executive Order, make the Democratic Party illegal!
Russia and China Running Scared of Revisionism. Click here.
Zelensky won’t apologize to Trump – top aide
What about free speech you talked about Donald Trump?
When America was really great it was not a crime to talk against a race or religion. The Bible said a lot of things that offends people today but that’s just too bad. Another indication that the enemy is getting scared. The antichrist Soviet Union was the first country to make “antisemitism” illegal. I wonder why? Find out more here.
The End of the First Amendment – Only Zionist Jewish Voices Allowed on U.S. Campuses
Closing down the Department of Education. I agree with Trump on this. It’s was the biggest waste of government money. It goes to show that there are thousands of thieves in America. It is estimated that over the years the tax-payer money they got amount to over 2 Trillion dollars. I didn’t know it cost so much to make our children dumb. Check it out.
Trump preparing Executive Order to eliminate Education Department
Each audio below is about 1 hour long. Below the links is how Adolf Hitler dealt with debt/usury. Many people believe that this is the real reason for World War 2.
We’ve all heard about President Donald Trump imposing tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China. With other nations, there will be reciprocal tariffs. Is this good or bad? If you listen to Trump, you might think it’s good. Sure, Donald Trump has done many good things, but is this one of them? Let’s take a closer look at tariffs and why they are in place.
Tariffs are implemented because either the imported goods undersell what America produces, or the exporting country is not importing an equal amount from the U.S. In other words, there is no balance of trade.
For example, Canada is not buying American cars, among other things. So, Trump has imposed a 25% tariff on them.
We are told that this puts Americans out of jobs and hurts our businesses. But why is this? It’s because goods are cheaper in another country, so many lower-income people have no choice but to buy what is cheaper. Tariffs on imported goods would hurt the poor. If they don’t have the money, they will either have to borrow it or do without. Both cases make it worse for Americans. They would either have to borrow money from the bank, which will make them worse off as they would have to pay interest, or do without other products.
The more people get into debt, the less they can buy—regardless of price and where the product is made. If they can’t pay, they might have to go bankrupt and perhaps lose what collateral they do have.
It comes down to this:
– People will either have to do without because they don’t have enough money.
– They have to pay more because of the tariffs.
– There are no products to buy, and some companies might expand their markets to other countries.
Think of the tariff situation like this:
You have a department store in town called Poland Store and another called America Store. They both have wholesale and retail sections. You have your goods and prices, and America has its store with its wholesale products and prices. You trade between each other. Each department store decides what they want to buy and how much; they know their customers’ needs and buy accordingly.
You might decide to buy less from America Store, and that should be your right. America Store might decide to buy more from Poland Store for their own reasons. In short, why should the government tell other stores what to buy, how much, and at what price? This is called freedom, and some leaders don’t understand that! When countries act like this, it causes hatred and animosity in the world.
We must go back to why America hasn’t produced some of the goods that Trump is complaining about. It seems like he is in the “blame game,” always blaming the other guy. Well, this started way before Trump became president, even in his first term of office. It happened over the years with companies seeing that it’s cheaper to hire and produce their products in other countries. In addition to the cost of labor in America, U.S. companies had more red tape to contend with, such as environmental laws and taxes. They had no choice but to move. After all, you are in business to make money, not lose money.
My suggestion is, instead of blaming others, make the environment in your country business-friendly, such as: fewer taxes, fewer regulations. I’m not suggesting that we lower our wages to meet that of the poorest nation in the world. We should keep our standards high. But we should look into why we have high wages in the first place.
First, they really aren’t that high considering the cost of living. But the answer is not, “Let’s raise wages; let’s raise taxes so we can give out more money to invaders and for all kinds of social benefits.” All this leads to higher and higher prices, and no one is ever satisfied. What we have to do is go back to biblical economics. But that would be another topic that would require a very long article to explain.
In short, we must do things the right way, the way that God wants us to do it—not how man does it! Man’s laws have been a complete failure, and imposing tariffs is not the answer.
When we do it God’s way, there will be no need for tariffs. Tariffs are nothing but a plaster on the sore without getting to the root cause of the problem. When we get to the root cause of the problems, our problems will go away, and everyone would be prosperous, healthy, happy, and safe.
Let us do it God’s way!
Have you ever noticed how the ISS seems to be playing an intergalactic game of Tetris with itself? One day it looks like a high-tech floating fortress, and the next, it’s got solar panels in different places like it’s trying on a new outfit. Are these panels really getting swapped out that often? Is there a secret Black Friday sale on space-grade solar panels that we don’t know about? And with space debris zooming around at 5 miles per second (seriously, that’s faster than most people run for free pizza), why even bother putting fragile panels up there?
No, my friends, this is all CGI wizardry! The ever-changing ISS is just a grand experiment to see how gullible we all are.
Speaking of space oddities, did you hear about those astronauts who’ve been stuck up there since last June? That’s right—just casually chilling in the void of space for months, yet looking as fresh and well-fed as contestants on a cooking show. Are we really supposed to believe they’ve got enough snacks and water squirreled away for that long? Space is tight, people! They don’t exactly have a Costco up there.
And let’s talk about the inside of the ISS—aka the ultimate DIY electrical hazard. Have you seen those pictures? It’s just a jungle of exposed wires! Who designed this thing, a toddler with a roll of duct tape? One wrong move, and an astronaut could unplug life support while reaching for a floating M&M. And are we seriously supposed to believe they can fix any random mechanical failure that happens? Do they have a stash of spare parts just floating around like lost socks in a dryer?
Honestly, years ago, I thought: “Why doesn’t NASA at least try to make the ISS look as sleek as a Hollywood sci-fi set?” And now, I think I have my answer—maybe they want to see just how much nonsense we’re willing to believe.
My Question: Can it be shown in a laboratory by mechanical means of an object moving in four directions at the same time and each direction it’s going at a different speed? Describe what would have to be built to show this.
To demonstrate an object moving in four directions at the same time, each at a different speed, you’d need to design a system that independently controls movement along different axes or directions while ensuring all those movements combine into a single object’s trajectory. Here’s how it could be built:
Components of the Setup
A small object or platform that will exhibit the combined motion (e.g., a lightweight ball, disc, or cube).
You’ll need four separate mechanisms to control movement independently along four directions:
Linear Motors or Tracks: For two perpendicular linear directions (e.g., X and Y axes).
Rotary Arms or Wheels: To simulate circular or angular motion in separate directions.
Elevation Control: For vertical motion if one of the directions is upward or downward.
Each mechanism should be connected to a controller that allows for precise speed adjustments for each direction.
A central control unit (e.g., a microcontroller like Arduino or Raspberry Pi) to coordinate the speed and direction of all motors.
Use position sensors (like encoders or accelerometers) to monitor and finetune the object’s motion for accuracy.
Implementation in a Laboratory
Step 1: Base Assembly
Construct a base platform with two linear tracks laid out perpendicularly (X and Y axes). Attach motors to these tracks to control horizontal movements.
Step 2: Rotary Mechanisms
Place a rotary arm or wheel system on the platform to add circular or diagonal motion. It could move either independently or mounted on the moving base.
Step 3: Elevation System
Add a vertical actuator (e.g., a piston or scissor lift) beneath the object to create upward or downward movement at varying speeds.
Step 4: Programming the Control System
Program the control unit to send different speed signals to each motor, ensuring each mechanism moves at the desired speed and in the intended direction.
Step 5: Integration and Testing
Combine all movements so the object displays simultaneous motion in four directions. For instance, if it’s moving diagonally on the X and Y axes, rotates, and rises or falls, the resulting trajectory will combine all these motions.
Example in Action
Imagine a lightweight cube mounted on this system:
The Xaxis motor moves it at 2 cm/s.
The Yaxis motor moves it at 3 cm/s.
A rotary arm spins it at a rate creating angular displacement.
The vertical actuator raises it at 1 cm/s.
The combined motion will demonstrate your concept.
Such an experiment demonstrates principles of superposition of motions and can have applications in physics labs, robotics, or animation setups. Let me know if you’d like further details on any component!
would an object on this ball, for example, be subjected be able to feel such motion?
Yes, an object placed on the ball or platform in this experiment would experience and “feel” the combined motions—though it wouldn’t have sensations like a human would, of course. Here’s how:
It might slide, tip, or roll depending on the friction between the object and the surface.
The relative speeds and directions of motion would determine the resulting path of movement.
If the ball is rotating and simultaneously moving linearly, the person or sensor would detect a spiralling or wobbling motion.
In Conclusion
Feeding this information into AI, it tells us that being on such an object would be impossible without feeling its effects, though it didn’t tell us in these exact words. We know that we don’t feel the multiple directions and the enormous speed that we are told we are going. We all agree on this. Yet, if were moving at such speeds we would be thrown off Earth.
Would you like to explore how this applies to a realworld scenario or experiment? Let me know!
My response: Yes, let’s explore more.
Let’s take this idea further and explore the physical sensations and realworld implications of an object on such a platform.
RealWorld Dynamics of the Combined Motions
If an object or person were placed on the platform, here’s how the combined motion might be “felt” or observed:
For a human subject, the combination of movements would create sensations of shifting, swaying, or oscillating depending on the directions and speeds.
If the movements included rotations, they might experience dizziness or a sense of spinning.
The resulting motion would depend on the combination of the speeds and directions. For example:
A linear motion on the X and Y axes combined with rotation would result in a spiral path.
Adding vertical motion would create a 3D trajectory, like a corkscrew pattern.
The object would experience forces from each motion’s acceleration. In a rotational system, for instance, the centripetal force would push the object outward.
If the motions change direction or speed suddenly, the object may experience jerks or jolts (similar to how you feel when a car brakes or turns sharply).
Applications and Related Experiments
This kind of setup isn’t just theoretical—it has practical applications in fields like engineering, aviation, and even entertainment. Here are some examples:
Simulators use similar principles to mimic complex movements, helping pilots learn how to navigate turbulence or rapid directional changes.
Psychologists and physiologists could use such a system to study how the human body perceives and adapts to multidirectional motion.
Roller coasters and spinning rides create complex motion patterns that mimic these combined motions, offering a thrilling experience.
This setup could be a classroom or laboratory demonstration of the superposition of forces and motions.
Challenges to Consider in a Lab Setting
The object could slide or tip if the friction between it and the platform isn’t sufficient. Designing the surface and securing the object could address this.
The motors and mechanisms need to be perfectly synchronized for the desired combined motion.
For humans, safety measures like seatbelts or harnesses would be essential.
First, I would like to congratulate Donald Trump for making the government more efficient. Two big departments that have been closed is The Department of Education and the US Agency for International Development (USAID). These two agencies have received billions of dollars a year from taxpayers and much of this money had gone to nefarious deeds – to people and governments that do not support the Christian values upon which America was founded.
With all that said, there is one agency that gets billions of dollars each year from the government (which really means from the taxpayers), that will not be closed down. This agency is NASA.
All flat earthers know of the lies that NASA said in order to get the people to believe there are billions of stars and planets out there; that there is a solar system with planets; that we landed on the moon; that we have put probs on Mars and have sent satellites into to the furthest planets in our solar system.
NASA budget is about $25 billion a year. Since its founding in 1958, it has received from the public coffers, approximately $650 billion.
Compare this to USAID, which received, according to the latest estimates, approximately $44 billion in 2023.
While the U.S. Department of Education received approximately received a jaw-dropping $78 billion. The total that it received since its operation in 1980 is a staggering $2.38 TRILLION!
You can see that NASA is in the top ranks of receiving money from the tax payers, too.
The reasons, to me, are obvious why NASA will not be closed down. First, Donald Trump’s right-hand man, Elon Musk, is in this fabrication of the heliocentric model; that his company, Space X, has received over $11 billion from investors and he would not want this big lie exposed. With his buddy, Trump, as president, he could very easily start receiving government money on top of what he has received already and make billions of more dollars each year. So, you see, contributing $100 million towards Trump’s campaign and receiving (possibly) billions more in return is a great return on his investment.
Another reason why NASA would not be closed down, in my opinion, is that it will tell the world that they have been lied to. Since other nations have gone along with a universe that is filled with suns, planets and galaxies, the people of the world would see that their government, too, has lied to them; that the teachers and professors have lied to them; that the media had lied to them. In short, their “house of cards” will come tumbling down. Finally, people will realize that this is another way of the government hides that there is a God that created everything just like the Holy Bible says.
Yes, it could be that Trump closes down NASA for mismanagement and not because that there is no such thing as planets and suns travelling through space and hundreds of thousands of miles per hour. And then, continue having the government give the $25/year to Space X, which is Elon Musk’s company. That is a possibility. Like I said, I don’t know what will happen, as this is a possibility. But I don’t see Trump or Musk come out and say that this whole space thing is a hoax.
Donald Trump has done some good things will in office but on the other hand he has proposed some bad things. So, he really is a mixed bag.
One such thing that Trump proposed is to buy Greenland. One reason he stated is because of mineral rights. Well, if it’s mineral rights that he’s looking for why not buy Antarctica from the penguins! There is plenty of minerals there, according to Admiral Bryd. But he hasn’t. Many countries have research labs there, including the United States. This continent is basically divided up among the nations that are already there. I believe that Trump was told that the Antarctica is a “no-go-zone.” The Antarctic Treaty was set up not because of disturbing the nature of that area but for a reason what we are not told. I believe the real reason is, that if they go in further, they will be turned back by people who have technology much more advanced than ours, as has been reported by stories in the past. But that would take a long article to cover.
In short, I believe NASA will not be closed down for the above reasons. And if the truth gets out, our flat earthers believe, the governments of the world will not be trusted again; that Mystery Babylon of Revelation will be revealed and this, those in control don’t want us to know.
Click on the picture
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
Christian Flat Earth Ministry 
Truth or Charisma: What Do We Value Most?
The Paradox of Truth and Deception
“The men the American people admire most extravagantly are the most daring liars;
the men they detest most violently are those who try to tell them the truth.”
“The men the American people admire most extravagantly are the most daring liars…”
The Appeal of Bold Deception:
This suggests that Americans, perhaps subconsciously, are drawn to charismatic figures who project confidence, even if that confidence is built on falsehoods.
These “daring liars” often present simplified, appealing narratives that resonate with people’s desires or fears. They paint vivid pictures of success, security, or a return to a perceived “golden age.”
This can be seen in various contexts, from politics and business to entertainment and social media.
The “daring” aspect implies a certain audacity that can be seen as impressive, even if morally questionable. It suggests a willingness to break rules and challenge norms.
The Power of Narrative:
People are often more swayed by compelling stories than by dry facts.
A skilled liar can craft a narrative that aligns with people’s existing beliefs and prejudices, making it easier to accept.
The Desire for Simple Solutions:
Every problem often called complex or controversial. Liars often offer complex solutions and scapegoats, which can be appealing to those seeking certainty in uncertain times.
“…the men they detest most violently are those who try to tell them the truth.”
The Uncomfortable Truth:
Truth can be inconvenient, challenging, and even painful. It can force people to confront uncomfortable realities about themselves, their society, or their beliefs.
Those who speak the truth often disrupt established narratives and power structures, which can generate resentment and hostility.
The Messenger is Attacked:
Instead of addressing the truth itself, people often attack the messenger. This is a common tactic used to discredit and silence those who challenge the status quo.
This can involve personal attacks, character assassination, or accusations of bias.
Cognitive Dissonance:
When confronted with information that contradicts their existing beliefs, people may experience cognitive dissonance, a state of psychological discomfort.
To reduce this discomfort, they may reject the truth and cling to their existing beliefs, even if they are based on falsehoods.
The loss of trust in institutions:
In modern times, the loss of trust in the media, and in governmental institutions has caused people to be even more weary of those that present the truth. This is the first stage of waking up.
Overall Interpretation:
Mencken’s quote suggests a deep-seated distrust of authority and a preference for comforting illusions over harsh realities. It highlights the power of charisma and narrative in shaping public opinion, and the challenges faced by those who dare to speak truth to power.
It’s a stark reminder that:
Critical thinking and media literacy are essential.
We must be wary of those who offer say the problem is complex, when, in reality the solution is simple. Just look at the many examples found in the Holy Bible.
We should value those who have the courage to speak the truth, even when it is unpopular.