The Flat Earth Society Is Controlled Opposition!

Flat-earth-society

For those who have done research on the Flat Earth Society and found their website, you may have walked away thinking, “These people are not serious!” or other such thoughts. Well, you are right, as they are the controlled opposition.

The Flat Earth Society is a controlled opposition group that mixes truth with lies and satire to discredit genuine flat Earth research, a job they have been doing for a long time now. Founded in 1970 by Leo Ferrari, a suspected Freemason and philosophy professor at St. Thomas’ University, Leo spent his life making a mockery of the legitimate subject of our flat Earth. Though he passed away in 2010, his Flat Earth Society still exists today online as a website/forum which, still true to form, purports several false flat-Earth arguments and treats the entire subject as a dead-pan joke.

flat-earth-society-3In 1956 a genuine truth-seeker and flat-Earth researcher, Samuel Shenton, had started the IFERS (International Flat Earth Research Society) and was making quite an impact with his publications and interviews, revealing the truth of our flat Earth to the masses. The globalists attempted to ignore the threat posed by Shenton for over a decade before finally creating their competing, farcical controlled opposition FES (Flat Earth Society) which has spent the past 45 years steering all flat-Earth inquiry into the realms of satire and sarcasm.

To give an idea of how the controlled opposition works, consider the example of Leo Ferrari’s pumpkin-sized rock he would always take during interviews and lectures claiming he brought the stone back from the edge of our flat Earth! He would say, with a huge smirk on his face, how his boat had fallen over the edge but he was luckily saved by hanging onto this rock. Clearly, treating our flat Earth in this tongue-in-cheek way discouraged people from taking the matter seriously.

Ferrari’s entire schtick involved approaching the flat Earth subject from every angle EXCEPT the rational and scientific. For example, he published a series of articles including “The Global Fallacy as a Cause of Racial Prejudice,” arguing that people in countries at the top of the globe felt superior to those at the bottom, when in fact there was no top or bottom to the world, so, “even if one assumed that the world was spherical, the ‘top’ and ‘bottom’ have been arbitrarily selected, resulting in racial discrimination against those in the south. How can the globularists, their hirelings and dupes, seriously claim to believe that all men are created equal when they teach that some men are eternally fated to hang like bats from the bottom of a globe on which other men stand upright? The only solution is a flat Earth!” So instead of presenting measurements or experiments, instead of presenting any proofs or evidence, Ferrari would often simply argue the flat Earth as a serendipitous satirical solution to social problems.

In a famous 1971 CBC interview Ferrari was asked, “how do you explain the fact that the Earth appears round in the pictures taken from space by the astronauts?” Instead of answering and addressing the clear photo-trickery involved, Ferrari replied, “Simple. No doubt you’re familiar with Einstein’s theory of the curvature of space. If space is curved – and modern physics is based on that assumption – the Earth, from space, would appear circular. It’s a simple optical illusion.” This convoluted, pandering answer really is no answer at all and serves only to make the listener cock their head and raise an eyebrow.

Around this time, Charles K. Johnson, another genuine flat-Earther, took over the IFERS from the recently deceased Shenton. He and his wife Marjory, along with being flat-Earthers, were also vegetarians and anti-vivisectionist activists who campaigned for better treatment of our animal friends. In 1974, when Johnson heard of Ferrari’s budding organization, he decided to contact him and wrote a cordial letter requesting further information about his society, to which Ferrari never replied. Two years later Johnson wrote another polite letter saying, how he was “delighted by the prospect of a like-minded campaigner,” and said how it was “a very happy day” when he learned of Ferrari’s society. “I feel sure at the core we can’t be too far apart in aims,” Johnson wrote, “I do try to practice what I preach, to think and seek and search out reasonable ideas and concepts.” He closed saying that “he could hardly wait” to hear from Ferrari and hoped very much he would please reply. After six months without a response, Johnson wrote one more time, explaining again his sole purpose to “enlarge his view” and “getting and holding onto the facts,” which would benefit himself, and in time, the rest of the world. He requested a reply and a copy of Ferrari’s FES magazine. In conclusion Johnson signed “thanks from the bottom of my heart,” in advance, but warned that if Ferrari insisted on ignoring him once again, “I will then know for sure you are some kind of enemy of the Flat Earth work.” Eventually Ferrari did reply this time, but not with a message or magazine as requested, he simply enclosed a FES paid-application form.

Johnson investigated Ferrari’s organization further and found that he was using “the flat earth idea as a gimmick to entertain and promote the atheistic society.” From then on, Johnson worked hard to expand his IFERS and constantly for the rest of his life exposed Ferrari’s FES, calling him a “false prophet guilty of muddying the waters of truth.” Near the end of his life, tragically Johnson’s house burned down along with all the flat Earth materials he and Shenton had collected over their lifetimes. Until his dying day, Johnson claimed the fire to be the result of arson by a NASA agent he had seen snooping around.

Nowadays the IFERS has disappeared and only Ferrari’s FES exists as a website and message board maintained by moderators who, following in the footsteps of Ferrari, make a mockery of the whole thing and turn every thread into a joke deterring any serious flat Earth researcher from pursuing further. The only redeeming aspect of their website is the library of other people’s flat Earth material they maintain, which is actually quite good. The current President, Daniel Shenton, (coincidentally NO relation to the genuine flat-Earther and IFERS founder Samuel Shenton) can be heard in the following clip, still “muddying the waters of truth,” with several false flat Earth arguments (in the previous Post):

Notice he says he is “not sure about the Sun, Moon and planets, but that they’re probably spheres, but it’s definitely not proven, I think.” He flip-flops his answers and expertly fumbles his words as if intentionally trying to sound scatter-brained. Compare and contrast this shill with genuine flat Earth researchers like myself who will tell you unequivocally that the Sun, Moon, stars and “planets” are all merely luminaries, round discs of celestial light, NOT spherical terra firma capable of landing on as the Freemasons at NASA would have you believe. He then goes on saying “the effects of gravity, I feel, could be simulated by the disc Earth moving upwards, accelerating upwards at 9.8 meters per second, would have the same effects of what people traditionally think of as gravity.” This ridiculous false flat-Earth argument also appears on Wikipedia and the FES homepage. It is provably wrong as the “upwards accelerating disc” would smash into all helicopters, planes and hot-air balloons making sustained flight of any kind impossible, but they purposely promote these straw-man arguments so flat Earth neophytes will rightly laugh off their dumb explanations, and then following suit, write off the entire subject.

To combat Ferrari’s Flat Earth Society controlled opposition forum, and in memory of Samuel Shenton, Charles Johnson, and other true flat Earth researchers of the past I have now started this website – that you are now on ( ChristianFlatEarthMinistry.org ). Also, I have a chat room at: cfeministries.freeforums.net Soon, I’ll be having a newsletter to keep everyone up to date. If you can make a financial support, this would be much appreciated, too.

Posted in Flat Earth Society | Tagged | Leave a comment

Flat earth society interview with Daniel Shenton

Those who are in the leadership position of the Society today deliberately discredit the flat earth. Listen to Mr Shenton talk. He murky’s the water of flat earth believers as he says that the earth is constantly moving upward (which causes things to fall down). What makes things fall down is NOT gravity and it’s not an ‘elevator effect’ but rather that mass has weight and anything heavier than air falls. It’s as simple as that. He also said that he is not sure of the sun and moon but they are probably spheres.

In a future Post I’ll write about those who are in the FES and what they are doing is actually helping maintain the globe earth belief.

Posted in Flat Earth Society | Tagged | Leave a comment

How to Make a Globe Earth in Photoshop

photoshop-1

Craig-3

How to full the public by making a globe earth in Photoshop

You’ve all seen those nice, perfectly round globe earth with the deep blue ocean water that we’re told is earth. If want to know how they (NASA and company) makes it, keep reading. If you have Photoshop, you might want to try this.

Easy Photoshop Tips and Tricks

Have you ever wanted to easily create the image of Earth and dread using the circle tool? There is an easy way to design the world in six steps, and on the seventh step you rest (just a little joke). First, you should select File/New from the menu bar and create a file size that measures about 200 pixels by 200 pixels. The RGB mode should be selected for this trick. Next, choose a light blue shade for the foreground color and a darker blue for the background color.

Under the Filters tab, select Render, and then choose Clouds. Here, you can actually create clouds. But keep in mind these ‘clouds’ will not change. However, you’ll still fool most of the public. The scene that will greet you should look a lot like the sky. It is the clouds filter that utilizes the foreground and background colors needed to construct this image in your file. If you desire a different look, you can press Ctrl + F on Windows or Command + F for a Mac to reapply the filter. Each time this key combination is pressed, you will receive a somewhat different outcome.

Now, return to the Filter menu and select Render, and then choose Lighting Effects. Once you enter the Light Effects menu, you are able to alter the shape of the ellipse to a circle that becomes centered on your file. Changing the Narrow setting to 39 next follows choosing the Default Spotlight setting.

Sometimes a Photoshop project calls for texture. There are thousands of backgrounds to create that range from a grainy composition to a multi-faceted mess (depending on the look you are going for). To create a paper texture in Photoshop, you should start a new file that measures 60 x 60 pixels. The color should be in RGB. Next, select the following commands in this same order: Filter, Noise, Add Noise. Once completed, choose Gaussian, which is set to 80%.

The next step to create a paper texture is to select Filter, then Stylize, followed by Emboss. The angle should be set to -50, the Height to 2 pixels, and the Amount to 70%. The background will now resemble a gray embossed selection. To change the color, choose Image, then Adjust, followed by Hue-Saturation-Brightness. Once you select the Colorize check box, you should set the Hue to a different setting. To gain your personal preference, you can adjust the contrast.

To create the appearance that objects are glowing without using any filters, choose an object to work with that will be duplicated as a layer. First, select the color you’d like your glow to be. After choosing the lower duplicate, click on Edit from the menu, then Stroke. When the Stroke Options appear, the pixel width should be set between 1 and 16. It is important to remember that the larger number you choose, the thicker the glow will appear.

Before exiting, you should glance under Location to make sure that the Outside option is selected. The next step involves applying a Gaussian Blur to the layer, which can be found under the Blur option in Filters. This will soften the glow applied to the layer. Some individuals even repeat the process to create a double glow, which is some cases, can really make an image stand out.

Wahla! You have a globe earth. This is proof that we live on a sphere – and it’s backed up by the technology of Photoshop! What’s all this talk about a flat earth?

As a side note, Photoshop can make a flat earth, too!

Posted in Planets | Tagged | Leave a comment

Responding to Critics

Sometimes it’s not worth responding to Critics. I got a few on this website and I just delete their comments. I don’t do this all the time, mind you, but it is done. The reason why is, that these people are probably govt shills and if they are not, they might as well write to the feds and they can pay them for spamming lies.

When someone comes on this website and says that God is not good, or that the earth is indeed a globe, they are wasting my time and they have no intention on learning the truth. They like the LIE and want to stay with it. How do I know? If they are really seeking the truth, there is a ton of information here; there are hours and hours of videos to watch that are posted here. So, I don’t want to hear that the earth is speeding around the sun at 67,000mph. It’s OK for people who come here and believe in the globe earth but before they shoot their mouth off, do a little reading, watch some flat earth videos, THEN make a comment for something you don’t understand.

You see, these dishonest critics would love nothing more than for me (or for you) to spend my time writing each and everyone back. They aren’t going to read it – so why should I waste my time. I’ll let them waste their time to write their anti-Christ remarks. I can read faster than they can type then all I have to do is hit the ‘trash’ icon and be done with it 🙂

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 3 Comments

Supposed Curvature of Earth Never Factored In, Part 3

canal so-called curvature of earth“If the earth be the globe of popular belief, it is very evident that in cutting a canal, an allowance must be made for the curvature of the globe, which allowance would correspond to the square of the distance multiplied by eight inches. From The Age, of 5th August 1892, I extract the following: ‘The German Emperor performed the ceremony of opening the Gates of the Baltic and North Sea Canal, in the spring of 1891. The canal starts at Holtenau, on the south side of Kiel Bay, and joins the Elbe 15 miles above its mouth. It is 61 miles long, 200 feet wide at the surface and 85 feet at the bottom, the depth being 28 feet. No locks are required, as the surface of the two seas is level.’ Let those who believe it is the practice for surveyors to make allowance for ‘curvature’ ponder over the following from the Manchester Ship Canal Company (Earth Review, October, 1893) ‘It is customary in Railway and Canal constructions for all levels to be referred to a datum which is nominally horizontal and is so shown on all sections. It is not the practice in laying out Public Works to make allowances for the curvature of the earth.” –Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (23)

The London and Northwestern Railway forms a straight line 180 miles long between London and Liverpool. The railroad’s highest point, midway at Birmingham station, is only 240 feet above sea-level. If the world were actually a globe, however, curveting 8 inches per mile squared, the 180 mile stretch of rail would form an arc with the center point at Birmingham raising a full 5,400 feet above London and Liverpool. Adding the station’s actual height (240 feet) to its theoretical inclination (5,400 feet) gives 5,640 feet as the rail’s necessary height on a globe-Earth, more than a thousand feet taller than Ben Nevis, the tallest mountain in Great Britain!

“In projecting railways on a globe, the datum line would be the arc of a circle corresponding to the latitude of the place. That the datum line for the railway projections is always a horizontal line, proves that the general configuration of the world is horizontal. To support the globe theory, the gentlemen of the observatories should call upon the surveyor to prove that he allows the necessary amount for ‘curvature.’ But this is what the learned men dare not do, as it is well-known that the allowance for the supposed curvature is never made.” –Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (107)

“In a long line, like that of the Great Pacific Railway, extending across North America, the supposed curvature would, of course, be proportionately great, extending to many miles in height, but not one inch was allowed by the engineers for curvature during the whole course of the construction of that vast line of Railway. And, if we think of it, how could it be otherwise? All Railway metals must, of necessity, be straight, for how could any engine or carriage run with safety on a convex surface?” -David Wardlaw Scott, “Terra Firma” (125)

J.C. Bourne in his book, “The History of the Great Western Railway” stated that the entire original English railroad, more than 118 miles long, that the whole line with the exception of the inclined planes, may be regarded practically as level. The British Parliament Session in 1862 that approved its construction recorded in Order No. 44 for the proposed railway, “That the section be drawn to the same HORIZONTAL scale as the plan, and to a vertical scale of not less than one inch to every one hundred feet, and shall show the surface of the ground marked on the plan, the intended level of the proposed work, the height of every embankment, and the depth of every cutting, and a DATUM HORIZONTAL LINE which shall be the same throughout the whole length of the work.”

“One hundred and eighteen miles of LEVEL railway, and yet the surface on which it is projected a globe? Impossible. It cannot be. Early in 1898 I met Mr. Hughes, chief officer of the steamer ‘City of Lincoln.’ This gentleman told me he had projected thousands of miles of level railway in South America, and never heard of any allowance for curvature being made. On one occasion he surveyed over one thousand miles of railway which was a perfect straight line all the way. It is well known that in the Argentine Republic and other parts of South America, there are railways thousands of miles long without curve or gradient. In projecting railways, the world is acknowledged to be a plane, and if it were a globe the rules of projection have yet to be discovered. Level railways prove a level world, to the utter confusion of the globular school of impractical men with high salaries and little brains.” –Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (109)

“That in all surveys no allowance is made for curvature, which would be a necessity on a globe; that a horizontal line is in every case the datum line, the same line being continuous throughout the whole length of the work; and that the theodolite cuts a line at equal altitudes on either side of it, which altitude is the same as that of the instrument, clearly proves, to those who will accept proof when it is furnished, that the world is a plane and not a globe.” –Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (126)

Posted in Flat Earth Experiments | Tagged | Leave a comment

Supposed Curvature of Earth Never Factored In, Part 2

 

The Suez Canal: no curvature factored in when building.

The Suez Canal: no curvature factored in when building.

The Suez Canal which connects the Mediterranean Sea with the Gulf of Suez on the Red Sea is a clear proof of the Earth’s and water’s non-convexity. The canal is 100 miles long and without any locks so the water within is an uninterrupted continuation of the Mediterranean Sea to the Red Sea. When it was constructed, the Earth’s supposed curvature was not taken into account, it was dug along a horizontal datum line 26 feet below sea-level, passing through several lakes from one sea to the other, with the datum line and the water’s surface running perfectly parallel over the 100 miles. The average level of the Mediterranean is 6 inches above the Red Sea, while the floodtides in the Red Sea rise 4 feet above the highest and drop 3 feet below the lowest in the Mediterranean, making the half-tide level of the Red Sea, the surface of the Mediterranean Sea, and the 100 miles of water in the canal, all a clear continuation of the same horizontal line! Were they instead the supposed curved line of globe-Earthers, the water in the center of the canal would be 1666 feet (502 x 8 inches = 1666 feet 8 inches) above the respective Seas on either side!

“The distance between the Red Sea at Suez and the Mediterranean Sea is 100 statute miles, the datum line of the Canal being 26 feet below the level of the Mediterranean, and is continued horizontally the whole way from sea to sea, there not being a single lock on the Canal, the surface of the water being parallel with the datum line. It is thus clear that there is no curvature or globularity for the whole hundred miles between the Mediterranean and the Red Sea; had there been, according to the Astronomic theory, the middle of the Canal would have been 1,666 feet higher than at either end, whereas the Canal is perfectly horizontal for the whole distance. The Great Canal of China, said to be 700 miles in length, was made without regard to any allowance for supposed curvature, as the Chinese believe the Earth to be a Stationary Plane. I may also add that no allowance was made for it in the North Sea Canal, or in the Manchester Ship Canal, both recently constructed, thus clearly proving that there is no globularity in Earth or Sea, so that the world cannot possibly be a Planet.” –David Wardlaw Scott, “Terra Firma” (134)

Posted in Flat Earth Experiments | Tagged | Leave a comment

Supposed Curvature of Earth Never Factored In, Part 1

Curvature never factored in.

Curvature never factored in.

Surveyors, engineers and architects are never required to factor the supposed curvature of the Earth into their projects, providing another proof the world is a plane, not a planet. Canals and railways, for example, are always cut and laid horizontally, often over hundreds of miles, without any allowance for curvature.

One surveyor, Mr. T. Westwood, wrote into the January, 1896 “Earth Review” magazine stating that, “In leveling, I work from Ordinance marks, or canal levels, to get the height above sea level. The puzzle to me used to be, that over several miles each level was and is treated throughout its whole length as the same level from end to end; not the least allowance being made for curvature. One of the civil engineers in this district, after some amount of argument on each side as to the reason why no allowance for curvature was made, said he did not believe anybody would know the shape of the earth in this life.”

Another Surveyor and Engineer of thirty years wrote to the Birmingham Weekly Mercury, Feb. 15th, 1890 stating, “I am thoroughly acquainted with the theory and practice of civil engineering. However bigoted some of our professors may be in the theory of surveying according to the prescribed rules, yet it is well known amongst us that such theoretical measurements are INCAPABLE OF ANY PRACTICAL ILLUSTRATION. All our locomotives are designed to run on what may be regarded as TRUE LEVELS or FLATS. There are, of course, partial inclines or gradients here and there, but they are always accurately defined and must be carefully traversed. But anything approaching to eight inches in the mile, increasing as the square of the distance, COULD NOT BE WORKED BY ANY ENGINE THAT WAS EVER YET CONSTRUCTED. Taking one station with another all over England and Scotland, it may be stated that all the platforms are ON THE SAME RELATIVE LEVEL. The distance between Eastern and Western coasts of England may be set down as 300 miles. If the prescribed curvature was indeed as represented, the central stations at Rugby or Warwick ought to be close upon three miles higher than a chord drawn from the two extremities. If such was the case there is not a driver or stoker within the Kingdom that would be found to take charge of the train. We can only laugh at those of your readers who seriously give us credit for such venturesome exploits, as running trains round spherical curves. Horizontal curves on levels are dangerous enough, vertical curves would be a thousand times worse, and with our rolling stock constructed as at present physically impossible.”

Engineer, W. Winckler, wrote into the Earth Review October 1893 regarding the Earth’s supposed curvature, stating, “As an engineer of many years standing, I saw that this absurd allowance is only permitted in school books. No engineer would dream of allowing anything of the kind. I have projected many miles of railways and many more of canals and the allowance has not even been thought of, much less allowed for. This allowance for curvature means this – that it is 8” for the first mile of a canal, and increasing at the ratio by the square of the distance in miles; thus a small navigable canal for boats, say 30 miles long, will have, by the above rule an allowance for curvature of 600 feet. Think of that and then please credit engineers as not being quite such fools. Nothing of the sort is allowed. We no more think of allowing 600 feet for a line of 30 miles of railway or canal, than of wasting our time trying to square the circle”

Posted in Flat Earth Experiments | Tagged | Leave a comment

Major Christian Group Support Old Earth

Recently there was an article about the 700 Club and Pat Robertson. He says that those who support a young earth make Christian look foolish. He says that it will not win people to Christ.

This is the problem with many people who call themselves Christians. Many of them may be right on target on some issues but they are way off on others. Of course, with the 700 Club, they are off target on may issues, such as with Jews being God’s Chosen people and that God’s laws have been done away with.

With what Robertson has said it makes me thing that he is part of the New World Order. After all, by believing in a universe that is 13 billion years old – or whatever – makes people believe that we evolved. The only difference is that God started the process, verses it done by accident. Naturally, these people will never believe in a flat earth if the believe in an earth that is billions of years old.

For those who can understand the flat earth will no longer believe that the earth is billions of years old, as they would not be able to explain how completion got here so fast. In other words, once people understand that there is done or firmament, as the Bible tells it, that this is needed in order to hold our atmosphere, they will not that we could not have ‘evolved’ to reach this condition.

I could never understand how people could believe in an earth that is billions of years old, while claiming to be a Christian, too. This is all the more reason to introduce people to the flat earth concept, as it will expose the lies that are being taught in the churches today.

What are you doing to spread the flat earth truth, and, thus, Bible truth? I hope you found a way to get the flat earth news out there.

God bless.

 

Posted in Bible and Flat Earth | Tagged | Leave a comment

Major Flat Earth Chat Room Taken Off Line

Flat Earth Chat Room

I recently found that a large flat earth chat room was taken offline. This was run by Eric Dubay and the name of his site was International Flat Earth Research Society. He had about 2,000 subscribers as well as thousands of guests. So far, I have not found the reason why this was taken down by Proboards.net. When you go to his former site, you will be directed to a page that says it was in violation of section 25a. Now, what that means, I don’t know. If there are any Readers out there that do the know the reason, kindly respond to this Post. Thank you.

I have my suspicions of why Dubay – who is a not a Christian by the way – was taken down. He had a section on his chat room site that talked about conspiracies of various kinds. On of them was on Hitler and how he was right (which is a long story). This, I believe would peeve ‘the powers that be’ more than the flat earth. Probably someone said that this ‘was hate’ and claimed ‘anti-Semitism’ or some such nonsense.

We all know that the major news media is controlled and they don’t like any discussion on government conspiracies of any kind. Though, there are some that they do tolerate, there are others that can put you in prison in some counties. One such example is in Germany. Denying that six millions Jews were killed will land you in prison. This is the same in Austria, France and perhaps other countries.

Back to the main point of this article. What Eric failed to do was to ask for people to send them their regular email address. On the forum, when you are an Administrator, you can just send them messages within the forum. Another mistake he probably made is, that he did not copy on to his computer all the Posts – many of which had valuable information and insights.

Dubay has set up another forum but it had only about 49 member (when I looked). So, it’s down quite a bit from his previous one.

Eric Dubay was hostile to Christians, and that is one reason why I started Christian Flat Earth Ministry. Now it our chance to take the lead in the flat earth debate. While there are many Christian flat earthers, it seems that the leaders in the flat earth movement are agnostic, have some eastern belief of no belief at all.

Flat earth is about Creation and it’s about what the Bible says. I can not see how you can divorce Christ from this research but somehow keep God in! It’s really strange how some flat earthers will admit that there is a Creator and even call him God, but they take Christ out of the picture. In fact, I’ve seen Dubay and others who are not Christian have biblical references to the stationary flat earth but ignore the rest of the message of the Bible. The fact is, introducing people to the true story of creation, gives us an opportunity to tell others of the other Bible stories, including the saving power of Jesus Christ.

 

Posted in Bible and Flat Earth | Tagged | Leave a comment

Russians Building Nuclear Engine to Take Man to Mars in 45 Days

Here is another indication that Russia is on the heliocentric conspiracy – claiming that they are building an engine that will take man to Mars. They might well be building a nuclear engine but it will not take them to space – and they know it.

Have you ever wondered why Russia never attempted to go to the moon? Because they knew that it was a fake from the beginning but they were smart enough not to waste money on such a project.

Russia’s nuclear agency, Rosatom, the General Director Sergei Kirienko said the nuclear engine will allow a spaceship to reach Mars in only 45 days.

Now, Russia has money to waste, while under Communism (when the American ‘moon landings’ were occurring) they didn’t have the money. You can be sure that in the years to come that IF you hear of a Mars mission, you can be sure that it will be staged. So, IF this does come out, and there if filming of ‘the landing’ like on the moon, you will be able to spot irregularities. Of course, this news could fall into the dustbin of history and you will not hear of any Mars mission.

Resourse: sputniknews.com

 

Posted in Planets | Tagged | Leave a comment