No “Gravity” In Space Lie

Posted on October 12, 2016 by revealed4you

“Gravity” Between The Earth and the Moon

space-station-gravityauthor-rd  We often see astro-nots performing in their “International Space Station” doing all kinds of gyrations for viewers. They show how things float in space and catching food in their mouths. These stunts are for us to believe that there is no gravity in space. Of course, we know that there is no such thing as gravity period, but just that objects fall; this is another topic. Anyhow, here is something I thought about that I haven’t read in other flat earth literature or seen on flat earth videos and that is: exactly where does “gravity” stop and weightlessness start?

We are told that when in space there is no gravity but we are never told and never shown where this so-called “gravity” stops and where its effect is zero.

I have not seen from NASA or other space agencies of astro-nots going up in space and some point on the way up they show that there is no gravity. This can be shown very easily – IF what we are told is the truth – by showing how much longer it takes for an object to drop to the floor. Why aren’t we shown this? We all know the answer but following along NASA’s line of of “no gravity in space,” let’s continue.

We read in Wikipedia:

The ISS maintains an orbit with an altitude of between 330 and 435 km (205 and 270 mi) by means of reboost manoeuvres using the engines of the Zvezda module or visiting spacecraft. It completes 15.54 orbits per day.

That means that somewhere between the earth and 205 miles up there is no gravity. OK but where does gravity lose its force? In other words, at what altitude does an object takes longer to fall? This should be able to be shown on a video. I haven’t seen any. Or, are we to believe that at a certain altitude up all of a sudden there is no gravity?

Now, even if NASA comes up with a video and information that goes with it, it’ll be fake. Even IF we are told something, then they have to answer another question, which is: At what point in travel to the moon that all of a sudden gravity kicks in again? For example, we are told that the moon has 1/6th the pull of earth. OK, at what altitude did our astronauts feel this? We were never told this.

Tangle Web of Lie

There is a tangle web of lies NASA and others are faced with once one lie is told. Some other questions are:

If the moon is suppose to pull the oceans of the world, and the moon does this from a distance of 237,000 miles, then how can astronauts not be effected by this pull? How can there be no gravity with this range? If the moon pulls on the oceans, this is a massive amount! So, how can there be a place within this force field where there is no gravity?

IF what we are told that heavenly bodies have an attractive force on the smaller bodies how is it that the moon, which is much smaller than the earth, pull trillions of tons of water? Then, once it has this pull, why does it release it?

If the oceans are pulled away from the land why does the ISS, and all satellites for that matter, be pulled further up in space? Why isn’t the ISS, for example, be pulled to the surface of the moon? Hey, we’d get a free ride there. But on the other hand, with such a pull, how in the world can a little rocket leave the surface and fly back to earth?

In short, this is another reason that tells us that “gravity” does not exist, and satellites don’t exist either.

Posted in Gravity | Tagged | 4 Comments

Little Known Secrets of the Flat Earth

Posted on October 11, 2016 by revealed4you

Could the Earth Also Create It’s Own Metals?

oil-well-off-shore2author-rd  I happened to be listening to an audio tape the other day that had nothing to do with the flat earth. In the beginning of this tape the speaker told about a news article that appeared on the front page of the Phoenix Gazette. This audio was made in 1982 and the speaker said the article was in a Saturday edition of the newspaper. No date was given.

The article said that divers in a submarine discovered 6,000 feet below the surface of the ocean, off the coast of California, what looked like chimneys rising 100 feet up with of a streams of oil coming out. They described it as seeing oil in the making; that there were different grades of oil. They also identified, upon examination, that this column was pushing up zinc, copper and iron oxide. The observers described it as earth’s oil fracking plant; that the earth actually creates its own oil. Now, this we have learned in recent years but to read this back in the 1980s shows that this information has been kept under wraps.

The interesting thing is, that could earth create its own minerals? Could earth create at least some of its own minerals? Or, was this minerals already deep underground? Since oil is created could minerals also be created? According to this old article it sounds like it. Think of the magnificence of God’s creation!

In recent years there have been talk on alternative news sites that the earth create its own oil. In other words, oil does NOT come from decaying plant and animal matter. During the time of the Soviet Union they had notices that some of their old oil wells that had gone dry filled up with oil again years later. Americans then discovered this same process but this information has been kept secret. The reason being is, to make it look like oil is in limited supply and thus keep the price of oil high.

Could the earth also be creating its own minerals – given a certain amount of time, pressure and heat to do so? Don’t expect to hear the truth from mainline media.

Now and then the truth comes out in the media – even if it’s by accident. Could this news article that appeared 34 years ago be one of them? Could the media been told not to report any more on such a topic?

Yahweh God, in His great wisdom, not only created the earth and all life therein but had planned from the beginning what would be need thousands of years in the future? We are told in the Bible, for example, about Job; that God knew him from the foundations of the earth. Since God knows one person and how he’ll be, He also knows about each and everyone one of us. God also knows what man will and will not do and plans things accordingly. In other words, God is not caught by surprised when some evil man does something and thereby messes up His plans. This is contrary to the false teachings that we have in churches today. If you talk to the average Christian they will tell you that God had Plan A, then when that didn’t work He had Plan B. An example would be that God chose the Jews but because they didn’t accept Christ as their Saviour, He had to go to Plan B and accept the Gentiles. (That is another whole story.) The point I want to make is that God had thought EVERYTHING out to the final conclusion.

You might want to do your own research on abiotic oil. Here are a couple of links to get you started:

Discovery backs theory oil not ‘fossil fuel’

http://www.rense.com/general58/biot.htm

http://www.rense.com/general58/abioticoilscience.htm

I believe that God had created the earth and all the chemicals, metals and other materials that man needs. And that if we follow His Laws, Statues and Judgement, we will not be short of anything!Contrary to what the “fear mongers” would have you believe that we will run short of this, run short of that, etc. No, God has provided EVERYTHING for us in the right measure.

In conclusion, this is another secret of the flat earth, namely, that the earth produces its own oil and at least some of its own minerals. What a wonderful God we serve!

Hidden Gold

gold-mine  Talking about the earth producing its own oil and possibly its own minerals, the fact is that we do have more minerals in the ground than what is reported. My brother-in-law used to work in the South African mines many years ago digging for gold. There were mostly Black workers but he is White and was a good worker. He told me that on three occasions in his life he came across a vain of gold that was huge. He told his boss and the company was about ready to celebrate but the word came down from the very top of the company to remain silent and close up the shaft they dug! Get that: keep silent and close up the shaft.

gold-vain  Why was this? To keep the price of gold high! The exact location was market and the company kept a record of it, of course. So, when more gold is need, it’ll be there.

Hidden Diamonds

About the diamonds, I heard this from some reporter on the internet where she was shown by a rich Jewish owner of a diamond mine some diamonds. She was asked if she would like to see more diamonds, and she said yes. (What woman doesn’t want to see more diamonds 🙂 Anyhow, it wasn’t just a couple of rings or a small tray but crates of diamonds stored in a warehouse! Now, you can believe it or not. But knowing how the billionaires think it does not surprise me that they want to keep this hidden in order to keep the price high. You may ask why did this guy show this to the reporter in the first place? My guess is, that some people just have to tell someone else about a big secret, to brag a bit. But about him being afraid that this news would get out, he knows that would not be a problem. First off, the media is controlled. And IF the story gets out they can say it was not true and then not mention another word of it from then on. They also know that people have a short memory and will forget about it, too.

In short, this great flat earth of ours has enough treasure for all of us, it’s just that we are not told about it.

Save

Save

Save

Posted in Bible and science, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Hologram: To Make Your Reality Seem Real

Posted on October 10, 2016 by revealed4you

Hologram and the Earth

 

Here is another technology technique used to create a false reality of earth. Just a few minutes ago I was watching a video on YouTube when I came across this. As you know, many news outlets use the spinning globe for their “world news.” But the one I saw in this video there is a bit of added technology that has been added – the use of a hologram for the clouds!

When you watch this video check in about 3:50 and you’ll see what I mean. This gives the illusion that the video is real; the clouds look 3-D and floating above the earth. The “clouds,” of course, do not change shape!

It’s amazing the amount of work that is done to continue to create a false reality for people.

By the way, you might like the video as it’s about more lies of the Clintons.

Posted in General Flat Earth Topics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Impossible To Send Signals Into Space

Posted on October 10, 2016 by revealed4you



Sending Radio Signals Into Space Exposed

satellite-orionauthor-rd  There are several reasons why it’s impossible to send and receive signals to satellites. Exposing sending and receiving radio signals into space. One is the dome or firmament. Another reason is that the distance is too far to send without a relay tower (like the kind we have all over the country.) But to start on this topic you’d have a much harder time to convince someone who is not a flat earth believer. For example, you’ll have to prove that there is a firmament and for people that are not Christian, for people who don’t believe in the Bible, it’ll be a hard thing to do. But there is another area I would like to talk on, that I hope globe earth believers will understand better. But first, I have to talk on another subject and that is a drone.

We all know that the America government uses drones in places like Pakistan, Iraq and Syria. The soldier that is operating the drone could be in Europe or as far away as America. Let’s say that a drone is being used is against an ISIS military truck and the soldier is in Germany. Through the camera the soldier gets video stream of the truck. He then determine it is a military truck from ISIS. So, he steers the drone in position – while looking at his computer monitor. The cross-hair is lined up and he pushes a button that sends a missile which destroys the truck. All well and good.

We all know how this happens and that is, by a radio signal that is sent and received. How was the soldier specifically able to do it? He got REAL TIME video feed and was able to send out REAL TIME signals to the drone. In other words, as soon as the target was lined up he immediately pressed the button which, in turn, immediately fired the missile – thus, the target was hit.

With the recent satellite named “Rosetta” which sent a probe on an asteroid recently, we were told that this took place 3.7 billion miles away. We were told by a senior scientist from the European Space Agency that a probe was launched from the satellite and landed on this asteroid.

Before I go further let’s look at what else we were all told since we were in grade school. We were told that the sun is 93 million miles away and it takes light 8 minutes to reach earth. We were also told that light travels at about the same speed as radio signals. OK, let’s assume all of this is true. We are also told how long it takes a picture or some other signal from any given satellite to reach us – depending on how far away. So, let’s do some math.

Now, check me on my calculations; I might be a little off, but it will not effect what I want to illustrate. Back to the “Rosetta” satellite. This asteroid is 3.7 billions miles away. Light travels at 186,000/per second which is the same for radio signals. Therefore, it will take 19,8924 seconds to travel 3.7 billion miles, which equls 3,315 minutes, which equals 55 hours, which equals 2.3 days.

We were also told that this satellite was flying around an asteroid which was also revolving – looking for a relatively flat place for the probe to land. On top of this we were told that the probe “bounced off” the asteroid twice before it as able to land safely (yea, sure). In other words, signals had to be sent back and forth to earth, which was 3.7 billion miles away! For one signal to be sent to earth and a command to be sent back it would take 110 hours! Think in terms of the signal being sent out from the satellite on Monday and receiving a signal back Thursday evening. Tell me, how in the H can you direct anything with such a huge time lag in between? In other words, there was NO REAL TIME! Yet people at the European Space Agency had to make real time decisions.

You simply can’t give commands to anything by radio signals when there is a time delay and expect to hit your target. Even if the satellite was where Mars is, the time delay of even a few minutes would be too great for it to make any manoeuvres you want it to. If everything was stationary – no moving satellite, no moving asteroid, then, maybe you can hit your target.

When a soldier is directing a drone to hit a target or to fly around buildings, it can do so because the distance is so short that it’s real time. Signals traveling at 186,282 miles per hour from Iraq to the United States you still have “live action,” as we are only talking about a fraction of a second. Imagine if a soldier had to wait even one minute; do you think that the truck, which is traveling, would be able to be hit? (Aside from a heat-seeking missile, of course.) No, as it would take a minute to receive the signal and a minute to send the command, that would be two minutes for the truck to move. Sending a receiving signals in an atmosphere AND with a short distance can be done. But when we are talking about millions of miles or billions of miles of space, it can’t be done.

Hopefully, for all the globe earth believers, who are told this would understand that it’s impossible for signals to be sent and receive in space, and even more ludicrous for delicate manoeuvres to be made when it takes 55 hours to send and 55 hours to receive a signal.

Posted in NASA Space Programs | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Questions on the Universe

Posted on October 8, 2016 by revealed4you

Questions on the Universe

Like my Post titled: Questions on Satellites, here is one on the cosmos. The purpose of these articles is to stimulate thinking and debate from people who believe in the heliocentric model of the universe. There are other questions that you may think of that you can add to this list but here are a few to get you started.

You might want to print this out when talking to a friend or copy-and-paste if you are emailing someone.

+++++

How can we still see the same constellations year after year if they are all traveling at the speed of light in their own directions?

How can we still have the same constellations that were recorded thousands of years ago?

How can we still have the “Big Dipper” after 4,000 years?

Wouldn’t that look more like a frying pan now?

cosmos-1 Astronomers say that we have different size stars. What star can be so huge that it looks like a spotlight in space as big as a galaxy?

If this lighted area is not from a star, what is it from?

If this light area is as big as a galaxy, how can life exist within this brightness?

How can any planet exist without being burned up?

(Showing a picture of some galaxy to a friend that has a lighted area of violet, for example, ask a question based on the color.)

What produces the violet color?

(If your CGI picture has, for example, a pink cloud, ask a question based on this color. It’s always good to add a little humour in it, too. 🙂

What can produce this smoke or cloud that looks like it’s trillions of miles wide?

Can you imagine living in that pollution?

(Referring to the above picture.) What is all that dark junk in the picture? Whatever it is, it’s much bigger than any star or planet.

How can telescopes take pictures behind billions of other stars with their light? Wouldn’t that wash out the light that is closer to our view?

With trillions of planets, how can we see “behind” other stars?

The fact that we can see light from stars that are millions of light years away, how can it get here through a vacuum (that we are told space consists of)?

We are told that some of these pictures are really computer generated pictures, but why aren’t we told specifically which ones? And, if they are, how can we tell the difference? Since we can’t tell the difference – couldn’t they all be fake?

If any pictures are fake, what is the reason do you think for this?

Save

Posted in Planets | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Who Is The Antichrist?

Posted on October 8, 2016 by revealed4you

There Are Billions Of Antichrists!

antichrist  One of the biggest things that is talked about among Christians is, “Who is the Antichrist?” You even have non-Christians talk about this and Hollywood making films about the antichrist.

For many years we have had so-called Christian scholars tell us who the Antichrist is. Hundreds of years ago it was the reigning Pope; more recently we were told it was Hitler.

The fact of the matter is that there is no Antichrist – meaning one person who will rule everyone else. Here are the facts from the Bible:

  • the word antichrist is only listed in four verses in the Bible
  • there is no proper noun called the “Antichrist”
  • there are literally millions of people who are antichrist

The word “antichrist” is always used in the plural sense. Example:

Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time. (1Jn 2:18)

Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. (1Jn 2:22)

Here we learn that there are many antichrists – and this was back 2,000 years ago. Also, anyone who denies that Jesus is the Christ is antichrist.

Here are two more verses with the word “antichrist” in it. Outside of this there are no other Bible verses.

And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world. (1Jn 4:3)

For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. (2Jn 1:7)

The Bible makes it clear who is an antichrist, and that is ANYONE WHO DENIES JESUS IS THE CHRIST. This includes:

  • Jews
  • Muslims
  • Hindus
  • Atheists
  • Agnostic
  • Anyone who is not a Christian

Therefore, there are a couple of billion people in the world who are antichrist. It’s not one person but many. And, these antichrists did not enter into the world in the 21st Century but were here since the time of Christ.

I think that the reason why someone or group wanted Christians to believe that there was AN Antichrist is to throw the spotlight off them and focus it on one person – while all the other antichrists are going about trying to destroy Christians. Therefore, it’s not just the Pope, not just a Rothschild but anyone who denies that Jesus is the Christ is an antichrist.

And, yes, this includes other flat earthers who do not believe in Christ (and we know who they are).

Posted in Bible Studies | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Weird Gets Weirder

Posted on October 6, 2016 by revealed4you

Just when you’ve thought you’ve seen it all!

hurricane-cgi-monster  Just yesterday I was looking at a photo of Hurricane Matthew that hit Haiti and Cuba is now heading towards Florida. The caption said it was taken by the International Space Station (yea, sure). I thought that these hurricanes we’ve seen come from high flying planes – which many of them do. But yesterday I thought, “I bet that they are CGI made, too, just like all the satellite and planet photos.”

Well, my silent thought was answered today with this photo I saw on RT News website (see above), with the caption: Satellite images show ‘monstrous’ storm bound for US Yea, sure! Do you see the macabre image of a “monster?” Notice the smile, the teeth and the red eyes! You can also make out what would be the nose. It’s strange that the eyes (which is where the intensity of the storm is, then grey clouds, then the mass intensity of the storm again around the irregular shape of the clouds. This is much like the CGI clouds that are made for the globe earth.

Click Here for the original article.

Save

Posted in NASA Space Programs | Tagged | Leave a comment

Satellites and Their Fantastic Speed

Posted on October 5, 2016 by revealed4you

Questions on the Speed of Satellites

satellite-orionauthor-rd  In a previous Post I had an article of general questions you can ask concerning satellites. This one is focus on the fuel and the speed that satellites supposedly go. This is all done in order to get globe earth believers to re-think what they were told.

Before we go into the speed of the satellites, let’s discuss the ‘atmosphere’. We are told that there is no oxygen in space and that it’s a vacuum. This, we can tell our globe earth friend that it can’t be a vacuum as a vacuum cannot exist in an open system where it makes contact with space that contains no vacuum. After they understand that, then proceed with: there has to be some ether in space made up of some kind of gas otherwise it would not be able to fly. You can’t fly in a vacuum anyhow.

From what we are told satellites generate electricity from the solar panels that are used to operate it.

Why use solar panels at all when you have to constantly use the fuel to propel the craft through space? Fuel produces much more energy than what solar panels do and this energy can produce the electricity that is needed for the satellites to perform other operations.

“Gravity” creates speed

Now, I have to talk about ‘gravity that gives the speed’ before I can go on. We are told that gravity, the attraction of planets, gives the satellite much of the speed that it is required, and the fuel is just used to do different manoeuvres. OK, let’s think this through.

The satellite is given the ‘sling shot effect’ when it’s thrown from earth to get its start. Then, as it gets closer to another planet, ‘we are told’ that the planet attracts it. OK, if a planet attracts the satellite, and it’s pulling it along at 25,000mph, there are several problems to this. I’ll just answer one here while the answers are listed later in this article. If the gravity is of such great force to propel the craft at 25,000mph, why doesn’t it continue to bring the craft crashing to the planet’s surface? IF, the rocket fuel that is on the satellite kicks in, how can it generate the HUGE amount of thrust to repel the satellite from crashing into the planet? What about the stress on the metal? Where are the huge engines that produces all the thrust that is required? I don’t see any. What about the huge amount of fuel that is require? I don’t see any. What about the huge amount of exhaust of some kind that must be produced? I don’t see that, either.

So, ‘gravity’ is not the answer.

Speed of satellites

If satellites out in deep space travels 25,000 – 30,000 miles per hour, it requires the constant use of fuel. There are three main factors that increase fuel consumption, they are:

  • weight of the craft
  • speed of the craft
  • duration of the flight

The more the satellite weighs the more fuel it uses. The faster the satellite travels the more fuel it uses. Finally, the length of time the satellite travels the more fuel it uses. So, a huge amount of fuel has to be used?

With fuel (which we are told are two kinds that ignites on contact) where is it stored? Where is the exhaust?

Since the satellites are using fuel and can go at fantastic speeds, where is the engine(s)? It’s got to have a massive rocket thrusters.

Since there is no oxygen in space, how can fuel burn? You need something to come out of the exhaust to give it the ‘push’ so to speak. (All airplane and rockets ‘push off’ the atmosphere. With planes it’s the air pressure differential, from the top of the wing and the bottom, that gives it its ‘lift.’)

If the satellite carries its own oxygen, where is it stored? Where is the massive tank that is required to carry it? (Contrary to what the ‘senior engineer’ said at the European Space Agency, “that two fuels are used that ignite when mixed,” what are names of the two fuels? How does the fuel do this exactly?

Since there has to be some kind of gases that is in space, what are they? Astronomers can’t say on one had that space is a vacuum, yet physicists tell us that you can manoeuvre in a vacuum, someone is lying. So, since “we do travel in space, lol,” what are the gasses that comprise it? So, how does a frail satellite with all the thin rods, arms and solar panels not break off with “wind speed” of 25,000 and 30,000 miles per hour? How is it that the whole satellite doesn’t’ melt down completely with all the friction it produces? After all, we are told that the heat shield of the space capsule is required when it enters the atmosphere, and this speed is only 17,000mph. Well, a satellite travelling in deep space goes even faster. How is it that it doesn’t blow in pieces AND melt?

Hopefully, with these statements and questions, your globe believing friend or acquaintance will see through the lies that space agencies around the world have been telling them.

Save

Posted in General Flat Earth Topics, Gravity | Tagged | Leave a comment

Some Questions On Satellites

Posted on October 4, 2016 by revealed4you

Getting Globe Earth Believers To Question Their Own Beliefs

asteroid-rosettaauthor-rd  As flat earth believers, it’s good to start off asking innocent questions to get the globe earth believers to start thinking for themselves. I had mentioned this in a previous Post but with this article, I’d like to focus on artificial satellites. You can focus on any other topic within the flat earth debate as well.

Concerning questions you can ask about artificial satellites, here are a few:

How can satellites carry all that fuel?

How can they get enough electrical energy from solar panels when they can get electricity from the fuel?

Who or what is taking the photos of the satellite?

If some of the pictures are CGI, why aren’t we told which ones?

IF we are told certain pictures are CGI, and they look identical to the original, how do we know they are not all fakes?

Since it’s important to test crafts on the earth – since it’s a matter of standard research and development, why don’t we see any test on the earth?

Why aren’t the public shown satellite test flights?

Why don’t NASA show at least a video of a satellite test flight on earth?

Why can’t we see where the fuel is stored?

Why don’t we ever hear of small meteorites hitting and damaging the satellites?

You may have other questions you can add to this. In short, with all this questioning, you can notice that I did not use the words “flat earth” once.

The purpose of all this questioning is to get your friend or listening audience to question their own belief; to get them to start doubling what they are told.

You might want to ask them “What do you think about what we’re told?” OR “Why haven’t others asked such questions?”

I hope this helps you in spreading the flat earth truth. Of course, the question strategy can be sued on any other conspiracy topic that the government doesn’t want you to know about. An example is with the 9-11 bombing in New York City, you can ask: “How does a building fall down on its own ‘footprint’ by just a plane hitting it?”

Save

Posted in NASA Space Programs | Tagged | Leave a comment

Landing a Satellite On An Asteroid

Posted on October 2, 2016 by revealed4you

Rosetta Mission: More Bull From The European Space Agency

There was a recent so-called landing of a probe on the asteroid called Phiae. I came across a one hour talk on this and I thought: I really hate to listen to this but I guess I should in order to find out what detailed bull they are telling others. Well, as I learned it was more lies than what you heard on the one minute exert they had on most TV news coverage. So, here goes and get ready for some good laughs.

asteroid-rosetta   This launch of the “Rosetta Mission” occurred 12 and a half years ago. And, were told that the asteroid is 3.7 billion miles away. One girl in the audience asked what kind of fuel it took and the “scientist” said it was two fuels – one of which he didn’t remember. Anyhow, he said that it ignites without oxygen and without a spark. Now this is really amazing – IF such a thing exists. But I see other problems with this that I’ll discuss shortly.

Limit to the Amount of Fuel a Satellite Carries

We are told that because of the distance from the sun the solar panels were only able to get 4% of the energy and the man said it was barely enough to keep the fuel from freezing. With such cold temperature “that we are told” so how can so little energy be enough to keep the fuel from freezing?

As for the fuel – IF such a fuel exists – the other problem is, how can it carry enough fuel to last 12 years! What kind of miles per gallon does it get? Then, look at the amount of volume is required to carry all that fuel! Look at the amount of weight would be required! Each gallon weights about 7 pounds (if my memory is correct). There is some math ratio that says you can only carry so much in fuel and that is it. With the photo (CGI) provided, there is simply not enough room for thousands upon thousands of gallons of fuel. In fact, I don’t see any place where there can be fuel storage – at least not more than a gallon or two.

There is a math formula that states there is a limit in the amount of fuel any flying object can carry. The more fuel you carry, the larger and more powerful the engine to carry the weight until you reach a limit and you won’t get off the ground.

If the satellite got 50,000miles/gallon (wow!) look at how many thousands of gallons would be needed; look at the weight. This is pretty good mileage for this weight – even if it just weight 100 pounds. If they got 1 million miles/per gallon it would still be 3,700 gallons of fuel.

Gravity Fling

The scientist went to say that it took “three orbits around the earth to get enough fling to shoot it out.” Oh, really! How did they get the satellite back to start all over again? What kind of science is it when you have to depend on a “fling of gravity?” Then, we were told that it took another “gravity fling” around Mars to give it a further push.

Bouncing Off the Asteroid

The speaker at the front of the small group of people said the probe bounced off the asteroid three times before it landed. The first two just “bounced back.” Hey, I know I’m using a lot of “scientific words” but these are the words of the “scientist” or “professor” that was speaking. Lol.

So, we are told that the probe just bounced off the surface. They would have us believe that the whole probe was made of rubber! It’s amazing it didn’t crash in 1,000 pieces, as when it did land for the third time everything was OK and it’s sending back photos (they got 80,000 so far).

At another time we were told that the probe landed at “walking speed.” IF this was the case, why did it “bounce” back in the first place? It should have just landed there – plop! The picture of the landing didn’t show anything broken – amazing.

In another video I saw, it was told that the asteroid was composed of dust in frozen water. Yet, in the 40 minute video I saw, we were told that there are gasses emitting off the surface. Why not steam? Besides, IF it was frozen water, this would have been world news in itself. And why, in the 40 minute video we were told that it’s made of rock? Rock is NOT frozen water and it’s not dust trapped in frozen water.

Such are the lies that we are told by world space agencies.

Posted in flat earth discussion | Tagged | Leave a comment