Another Hoax Exposed: Fossil Fuel

Another Hoax Exposed: Fossil Fuel

With the recent post of dinosaurs being a hoax, you may ask, “Doesn’t oil come from dead dinosaurs?” No, it doesn’t. “Doesn’t oil come from plants and other living matter?” Again, the answer is no. Find out what this retired oil executive says. When you see this, everything starts to make sense.

.

 

Posted in Fake Science | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Comments on New Zealand Shootings

Comments on New Zealand Shootings

Article 1, Click Here

Article 2, Click Here

You have all read of the New Zealand shootings by now and how the political leaders from around the world are sending in their condolences. Well, I could say a lot, but what I’ll do is just let you read the Comments under these two articles – they tell it all. People world-wide are seeing through the lies – from the ‘Father of All Lies’. Also notice, the number of ‘Like’ or ‘thumbs up’ on these replies.

Many people are seeing this as a contrived event; either as a false flag, that it never happened, OR, that it did happen but with a ‘Manchurian Candidate.’ Here is something that one person wrote on the Yahoo articles under Comments, “why is the face of the murderer covered up when his face was already shown” (the scene when he was taken into court). Good question. I mean, we are not talking about a little child who is under age, but an adult that was caught. Could it just be that he is part of the Establishment, or is a ‘crises actor’? I don’t know, it’s just a question.

Of course, as it is brought out in the Comments, that the aim is to clamp down on gun ownership in New Zealand. And, if you think that is to ‘conspiratorial’ consider this, a number of years ago, Australia had a mass shooting where many people were killed. And guess what? Many types of guns were outlawed right after that. But did homicides go down? No, they went up! (As was predicted by those who do own guns.)

Do take time to read the two articles and the Comments below them.

 

Posted in media lies, mind control | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Where Dinosaurs Come From

Where Dinosaurs Come From

You’ll be surprised where dinosaurs come from. I don’t mean 60 million years ago or some place like North Dakota? Watch this video where it’s admitted where dinosaurs come from.

The previous post was well accepted and got a lot of views, so I thought I make another Post. Like the globe earth, the dinosaurs are a big hoax, too (excuse the pun). But this is all part of getting the public to believe in evolution and billions of years old the earth myth; to get us away from believing in the God of the Bible.

.

In light of this, it makes me think of Kent Hovind. He had a museum were he has a ‘dinosaur park’. Though he has lost control of what he built, he is still preaching and still firmly believes in dinosaurs. Now, he did and still does an excellent job on exposing Evolutionists, but he holds on to the dinosaur theory and says that they lived with man up to Noah’s Flood period. Now, he could sincerely believe in this but it could also be that his very livelihood, and his very identity is tied to this dinosaur belief. It takes a brave man or woman to admit that they have been wrong their whole life. But that is why we have to be –  humble, as the Bible tells us. After all, each one of us, including myself, had to admit that we were fooled about the globe earth and trillions of planet belief, right?

So, we can’t turn to Kent Hovind and company for truth on dinosaurs but use our own reasoning, pray upon it, and make conclusions come what may.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Dinosaurs: Real or Fiction?

The Truth About Dinosaurs

by David Wozney

Note: Are dinosaurs fake? If so, why would they lie to us? Find out in this article.

Introduction

When children go to a dinosaur museum, are the displays they see displays of science or displays of art and science fiction? Are we being deceived and brainwashed at an early age into believing a dinosaur myth? Deep probing questions need to be asked of the entire dinosaur business.

This article will discuss the possibility that there may have been an ongoing effort since the earliest dinosaur “discoveries” to plant, mix and match bones of various animals, such as crocodiles, alligators, iguanas, giraffes, elephants, cattle, kangaroos, ostriches, emus, dolphins, whales, rhinoceroses, etc. to construct and create a new man-made concept prehistoric animal called the dinosaur.

Where bones from existing animals are not satisfactory for deception purposes, plaster substitutes may be manufactured and used. Some material similar or superior to plasticine clay or plaster of Paris would be suitable. Molds may also be employed. A 144-page book titled “Make Your Own Dinosaur Out of Chicken Bones” provides step-by-step instructions complete with detailed drawings and diagrams.

What would be the motivation for such a deceptive endeavor? Obvious motivations include trying to prove evolution, trying to disprove or cast doubt on the Christian Bible and the existence of the Christian God, and trying to disprove the “young-earth theory”. Yes, there are major political and religious ramifications.

The dinosaur concept implies that if God exists, He tinkered with His idea of dinosaurs for awhile, then probably discarded or became tired of this creation and then went on to create man. The presented dinosaur historical timeline suggests an imperfect God who came up with the idea of man as an afterthought, thus demoting the biblical idea that God created man in His own image. Dinosaurs are not mentioned in the Hebrew Bible.

Highly rewarding financial and economic benefits to museums, educational and research organizations, university departments of paleontology, discoverers and owners of dinosaur bones, and the book, television, movie and media industries may cause sufficient motivation for ridiculing of open questioning and for suppression of honest investigation.

Being fed more lies, this time about dinosaurs.

Dinosaur Discoveries

Early Dinosaur Discoveries in North America provides revealing information about the first discoveries:

“The class Dinosauria was originally defined by Sir Richard Owen in 1842, in a two hour speech that reportedly held the audience captivated. The original dinosaurs of this new group were Megalosaurus, Iguanodon and Hylaeosaurus. However, each of these animals was known only from fragmentary specimens. It wasn’t until the discoveries of dinosaurs in North America in the mid-19th century that people began to get a clearer picture of what dinosaurs looked like.”

“It is generally accepted that the first discovery of dinosaur remains in North America was made in 1854 by Ferdinand Vandiveer Hayden during his exploration of the upper Missouri River.”

“Near the confluence of the Judith and Missouri Rivers (shown above) Hayden’s party recovered a small collection of isolated teeth which were later described by the Philadelphia palaeontologist Joseph Leidy in 1856, in the Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.”

So, dinosaurs were described in 1842 before the discoveries in 1854 that were required to give a clear picture of what dinosaurs looked like! Were discoveries made or constructed to fit the descriptions?

“Dinosaur skeletons were found for the first time in abundance in the Garden Park area of Colorado and at Como Bluff, Wyoming, in the late 1870s. These specimens initiated the First Great Dinosaur Rush in North America, driven largely by the efforts of a Philadelphia palaeontologist, Edward Drinker Cope (on the left), and Othniel Marsh (on the right), a palaeontologist from Yale University.”

For the rest of the story Click Here.

Posted in fake news | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The First Causality Of War Is The Truth

Causalities of War

This covers only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to War Lie. There were those by the British who were the first to get into WWI and WWII, then there were the lies throughout the war. If this wasn’t enough the Liars where brazen enough to continue with the lies after WWII! Of course, we shouldn’t talk about that because it’s not “politically correct.” The producer of this video didn’t want to go too far into the truth, as it would be too much for people to take. The sad thing is, that when people are told too many lies for many, many years, they can only take a little truth at a time.

But us Truth Seekers care not for what’s politically correct but what are the facts.


.

Posted in Hidden history, media lies | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Politically Correctness and The Thought Police

Politically Correctness Madness and The Thought Police

If you want to know the origin of all this “politically correct” madness that we hear so much today, go over to the Bible Study Page of this website and listen to the video titled: Thought Police, part 1. (As a reminder, these videos are just left up for about two months and taken down to make room for others. So, copy the link if you have to, to listen at a later date. Next week, God willing, I will put up part 2 in this same section of this website.)

You’ll hear how the Elite intended to change the beliefs of a whole generation. This is their exact words “change the beliefs”! I believe they have succeeded. This sermon was given in 1990, when the “political correct” phrase just got started and enforced. We have gone way down the road of destruction since then.

In this sermon you’ll hear how a black professor was criticised because he said, “coloured students”, instead of “students of coloured”. It has really got crazy since than. In fact, just recently in the news there was a Member of Parliament who was criticised and had to apologise for calling another member “coloured”. The fact that they are coloured we can’t mention that; facts, reality doesn’t count in this day and age. Is it because they want us to be “coloured blind”? So, that we should marry anyone – regardless of colour? I believe that is one of their goals.

 

 

Posted in mind control | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Facebook Censorship

Musings 9 March, 2019

Here are some things that are in the news I thought I’d comment on.

A $25 million satellite was sent into space to identify if there are any planets that support life. All this is, what I call, “drip-feed news” – to support the globe earth/trillions of planets belief. There is nothing to this but to add support – if they could – to a heliocentric universe.

Facebook closes account to a “fake news” source with a reported 130 pages of links to other sites. We all know where this is leading – to close any Facebook Page or Group that is contrary to acceptable beliefs; on any topic, that is not supported by the establishment. They said they will report this to the police and government. So, what is it getting to be – a jail-able offence?

Continuing with Facelessbook, oh, I mean Facebook, it has also been recently reported that anyone who says that vaccines are dangerous and toxic will have their account closed, as they have already done so with others.

Fighting Facebook is the social media site called Gab at: https://gab.ai/home This is like Twitter. Well, they have a new app that is called Dissenter at: https://dissenter.com/ that allows you to post comments on any URL site. This does not go direction on the site but it brings it up in their own program (i-frame), where you can see other people’s comments. And, of course, it can be shared. Running across the top of the page are the top headlines for the day, where you can click on one and make a comment. Or, you can add your own URL. Anyhow, 10s of thousands have jumped on this free social media platform. Maybe one day it will rival the social media giants.

Anyhow, I will keep an eye out for any news on infringements of flat earth Facebook Groups.

Posted in fake news, media lies | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Earthly and Heavenly Things

If you do not believe earthly things, how will you believe heavenly things?

Click on for Avatar for article and watch the short video that comes after it.

 

Posted in Bible and Flat Earth | Tagged | Leave a comment

Scriptures Versus The Fable Of The Revolving Earth

Scriptures Versus The Fable Of The Revolving Earth

  The hypothesis introduced by Nicolas Copernicus that the Earth
revolves on an imaginary axis has been accepted as truth by the great
majority for centuries, it has been taught in the universities, schools,
and colleges of the world as a proven fact; often have atheists and others
used it to scorn the Divine inspiration of Scripture, and pitiful indeed
has been the camouflage adopted by the supposed supporters of Divine
Writ—who in reality generally agree with their opponents on this
subject—whereas their very attitude was and is a denial that the
Architect of the World could have been the Author of the Book they
profess to uphold. Let it be stated as clearly as possible that the
Scriptures teach that the Earth is round and suspended into space,
this was taught in the Word of God centuries before any philosopher
geographer or astronomer had discovered it, long before Homer had
described the Earth as a disk supported by pillars. Job had correctly
defined it as follows :

“ He stretcheth out the North over the empty place, and hangeth the
Earth upon nothing.”

In several places in Scripture is the Earth clearly described as
being round, for instance in Isaiah 40: 22 we read “ It is He that
sitteth upon the circle of the Earth . .” Again in Proverbs 8: 27,
it is written : “When He prepared the Heavens I (Wisdom) was there;
when He set a compass upon the face of the depth.” The Scriptures
further teach that it is the Sun that moves round the Earth, and not
the Earth round the Sun.

“ The Sun also ariseth, and the Sun goeth down, and hasteth to
his place where he arose.”

The theory that the Earth is animated with a diurnal rotation was
started with the assumption that the heavenly luminaries are solid
planets like our Earth, and not as stated by the Lord God who made
them, “ Lights ” (Genesis i : 14). This erroneous conception gave
rise to the hypothesis that it would be easier to revolve one world than
a whole heaven of Worlds, but having began their argument with a
wrong assumption, it has made them wrong all the way through.

The principal luminaries are opaque as seen during the eclipses,
and this has been thought sufficient evidence to prove that they are
Worlds like unto our own, but the want of transparency is by no means
a proof of weight, a cloud, although opaque, is nevertheless lighter
than the air.

The results of recent research prove that the heavenly luminaries
are not Worlds, but lights, and should cause all men who have been
led to accept as proven Copernicus’ theory of the motions of the Earth,
to reconsider this subject. Professor H. H. Turner, of Oxford, made
the following statement regarding observations carried out on the
brightest Star in the constellation of Orion: “ The most exciting
discovery as a result of measuring this Star in the winter of 1920, and
1921, and 1922 is that the diameter is changing and it looks as if the
Star is palpitating as a heart does.” Which is precisely what a light
would do, and not what a body like our Earth could ever possibly do.
It is now acknowledged, and has long been acknowledged that
Newton was entirely wrong in his theory of light. “ Light,” according
to modem definition, “ is the result of force causing the waves of
ether to vibrate with an almost infinite rapidity. How great that force
is can be measured by the fact that light travels round the world eight
times in a single second.” This again explains the “ infinite rapidity ”
with which the “ Lights ” (Gen. i : 14) seen in the Heavens travel
round the Earth.

. . Swift is the Sun in his course, for he compasseth the
Heavens round about, and fetcheth his course again to his own
place in one day.” (i. Esdras, 4 : 34).

Claudius Ptolemy, the great astronomer, had the advantage over
Copernicus in that he was a geographer as well as an astronomer,
whereas the latter held some dignities in the cathedral of Thorn in
Prussia. As a geographer Ptolemy knew the absolute importance of
the stability of the four cardinal points, outside of which topography
and accurate orientation are an impossibility. Now the four cardinal
points are fixed points in the sky, as acknowledged from time
immemorial, hence we are able, by them, to plot correctly any given
point on the Earth.

Logically it would be impossible, if the Earth revolved, to make
use of the cardinal points as fixed points in the sky, for the relation of
any given place in the rotating Earth toward them must continually
change. It would be like attempting to plot a point within a fast
running wheel of a motor car in relation to a fixed spot outside.
The force of this argument is sometimes evaded by saying that
the cardinal points of the compass are imaginary points, but that
will never do. The most exacting sciences are based upon the four
points of the compass, such as the science of survey, cartography,
and, of course, navigation. Millions have trusted their lives upon
this reality of the four cardinal points. When the skies are covered
the captain at sea has only his compass and his chart to guide him, and
the life of one and all on board depends upon the points of the compass
being a verity.

“ The North and the South Thou hast created them.”
Psalm, 89; 12.

Everything in the Tabernacle built by Moses was carefully
orientated as also the Temple erected by Solomon, and all its ornaments.
And he (Solomon) made a molten sea, ten cubits from one brim to
another, it was round all about . . . It stood upon twelve oxen, three
looking toward the North, and three looking toward the West, and three
looking toward the South, and three looking toward the East . .”
(i. Kings, 7; 23, 25.)

The Great Pyramid of Ghizeh also demonstrates how careful
the ancients were in the orientation of their buildings, and wherever
these are in existence they show no deviation from their original
orientation, which fact alone proves that the Earth is not animated
with any motion at all.

“ The World also is stablished, that it cannot be moved.”
Psalm, 93 : I.

It is claimed that the revolutions of the Earth cause the Sun and
constellations to be overhead in different places of the Earth at times
worked out in nautical almanacs and used by navigators to determine
their bearings, but the same calculations will apply to the rising and
setting of the heavenly luminaries. Whether A moves from B, or
B from A, the effect can be the same.

The Phoenicians indeed made extensive use of the stars in
navigation, and their daring seamanship and skill can be measured
by the fact that they spanned the seas as far as Britain to the West, and
across the broad Pacific to the American continent to the East, and
they believed in the rising and setting of the stars. Mr. J. W. Perry
informs us that only one pearl-field in the whole World (the West
Australian site at Broom) escaped the vigilance and accurate knowledge
of the ancients.

Let us examine the so-called experiments which have been
instrumental in causing men to reject the statements of God and the
evidence of their own senses in order to uphold the imagination of
Copernicus.

Newton maintained that it was possible to prove the rotation of
the Earth by the means of balls dropped from a height to the ground,
he claimed that the said balls would it deviate Westward, but would
fall a little to the Eastward of a pumbline, about half an inch, he
thought, at the height of three hundred feet. The reason he gave
is this ; “ Since the top of the tower is at a greater distance from the
axis of the Earth than its base, the centrifugal force must be greater
at the former point than at the latter; the ball, in falling does not
lose its impulse, and therefore advances before its plumbline, which
strikes the foot of the tower, since it has a less impulse Eastward.”
Experiments were carried out to test this theory on January 14, 1680
by Robert Hooke in the presence of a committee appointed for the
purpose, when he tried to prove the rotation of the Earth by dropping
balls from a height of 160 feet. The results were considered so
unsatisfactory that they were not even mentioned in the Philosophical
Transactions and were entirely forgotten.

One hundred and twelve years later, a young geometrician in
Bologna, Guglielmini, tried the same experiments from the Tower
Degli Asinelli, in that city, at a height of 240 feet. These experiments
also failed to prove any movement of the Earth.
Benzenberg, a German, performed similar experiments in 1804,
from the steeple of the church of St. Michael, in Hamburg. He let
fall 30 balls, from the height of 235 feet; the balls deviated from the
perpendicular four lines Eastward and line Southward according
to the direction of the wind. This was not considered satisfactory

Benzenberg repeated these experiments in 1805, in a coalpit, at
Schlebusch, at the height of 260 feet: and according to the fall of these
balls, dropped in a black coalpit, which balls were claimed to have
fallen five lines Eastward, Laplace, the French astronomer and atheist,
calculated that the chances are 8,000 to 1 that the Earth turns round
on its axis. Like the oracle of Delphi the answer was given from the
bowels of the Earth, it would not speak from above the ground in the
three previous trials.

Seeing that this statement of Laplace was, so to speak, the
ex cathedra utterance of “ science ” on this subject, it is interesting
to note what Napoleon, who had made him minister of the interior,
said of him. “A geometrician of the first rank,” says the emperor,
“ he did not reach mediocrity as a statesman. From the first, the
consuls became sensible thattheyhadmadea mistake in his appointment.
He never viewed any subject in its true light; he was always occupied
with subtilties; his notions were all problematic . . . ”
Yet Protestants, who reject the infallibility of the Popes with
scorn, do nevertheless, accept the infallibility of such men as these
with fervour.

But let us assume that the experiments at Schlebusch proved
what is claimed for them, then the same principle there evolved must
apply to all other bodies that are independent of the Earth. An
aeroplane in flight is as much independent of the Earth as the aforesaid
dropping balls, and if these have a speed differing from, and
independent of the supposed speed of the Earth, then the same
characteristic must distinguish the aircraft; its movement also should
be independent of that of the Earth; in which case, such an
aeroplane travelling Westward to America from England should have
the full benefit of America rotating Eastward, and both the continent
of America and the aeroplane should meet, one above the other, in
about four hours. This statement and the balls dropped by
Benzenberg stand or fall together.

But how many are there among those who teach this fable as
truth, that have the courage of their convictions to the extent of
undertaking this flight, with say five hours supply of petrol ?
Ptolemy has indeed advanced similar arguments to prove the
impossibility of the rotation of the Earth, and to parry these they
have been obliged to imagine that the air participates in this motion.
If this were the case, the air would obviously travel in one direction,
viz., the supposed direction of the Earth, how could any aircraft
travel against such a furious blast ? How could such an accomplished
feat as sky-writing be carried out in such a tornado ?
Ptolemy shows very ingeniously that the Earth must be at the
centre of the celestial sphere. He proves that unless this were the
case, each star would not move with the absolute uniformity which
does characterise it. He shows also that the Earth could not be
animated by any movement of transition. “ The Earth,” argued
Ptolemy, “ lies at the centre of the celestial sphere. If the Earth were
to be endowed with movement, it would not lie always at this point,
it must therefore shift to some other part of the sphere. The move-
ments of the stars, however, preclude this, and therefore the Earth
must be as devoid of any movement of translaiton as it is of
rotation.”

Posted in Bible and Flat Earth | Tagged | Leave a comment

They Are Really In Australia

mars-landing-hoaxFake Mars Landing

Note: Click Here to see another version of this article. I hope you like it as well as new Readers to this site.

  “I firmly believe that the American and Russian space program secrets are twofold, one is that the Earth is definitely stationary and the other is . . . space travel is bogus and is impossible beyond the Van Allen radiation belts . . . nothing of human origin has passed that gate, so the prince of all lies is forced to create an entire imaginary universe and solar system based solely on images from land-based astronomical observatories!

After all, we must accept that the “Prince of the power of the air” has dominion here for a small time?

Therefore I bow to every image coming from NASA as being “suspect” in its truthfulness.” …… “

Lots of people think Area 51 was created for the development of the U-2 [military spy plane] and stuff like the SR-71 [sometimes called the “Blackbird”], but it was really created to produce a fake universe and world for the USGS [United States Geological Survey] and mapping facilities all over the world.” ……

“Every image it’s ( the Hubble Space Telescope ) sent back has been nothing but rubbish, faked and spouting the futile doctrine of a universe in chaos … which we know not to be the case!”

“To make interstellar travel believable NASA was created. The Apollo Space Program foisted the idea that man could travel to, and walk upon, the moon.

Every Apollo mission was carefully rehearsed and then filmed in large sound stages at the Atomic Energy Commissions Top Secret test site in the Nevada Desert and in a secured and guarded sound stage at the Walt Disney Studios within which was a huge scale mock-up of the moon.

No man has ever ascended higher than 300 miles, if that high, above the Earth’s surface. No man has ever orbited, landed on, or walked upon the moon …

The tremendous radiation encountered in the Van Allen Belt, solar radiation, cosmic radiation, temperature control, and many other problems connected with space travel prevent living organisms leaving our atmosphere with our known level of technology.

Any intelligent high school student with a basic physics book can prove NASA faked the Apollo moon landings. If you doubt this please explain how the astronauts walked upon the moons surface enclosed in a space suit in full sunlight absorbing a minimum of 265 degrees of heat surrounded by a vacuum. NASA tells us the moon has no atmosphere and that the astronauts were surrounded by the vacuum of space.”

The groundwork is being laid . . . by NASA/Barry Goldstein et al and by Hollywood/Steven Spielberg et al and by Zionist PSY-OP agencies of “crop circle” builders and UFO Shysters like Steven Greer . . . for a future Orson Welles 1938-type “War of the Worlds” FAKED/STAGED alien attack and/or FAKED/STAGED messiah advent-coming……to rule the world ( special note: space aliens or ETs are fictional characters only and do NOT exist except in some people’s imaginations ).

Quote: “…… do everything you can to bring Mossiach ( The Jewish Messiah )!”

Rebbe Manachem Mendel Schneerson – the seventh and last spiritual leader of the

Chabad-Lubavitch movement … some Chabad Hasidim believe that he will return as the Messiah.

“The first and most primary problem for a Christian in the ‘alien messages’, is that the ‘Extraterrestrials’ have carefully but certainly usurped the role of God. They appear as transcendent beings that are superior to man. They know what we don’t know, see what we don’t see, and can solve what we can’t solve.

Second, they usurp the role of God as Creator. God is not our Father, the ‘Extraterrestrials’ are.

Third, if they are our creators, then we must owe something to them. How about our souls, our hearts, and our allegiance?

Fourth, when the ‘alien messages’ are all put together, we find that their combined effect is the creation of a new religion. Themes of transcendence, supernatural entities, spiritual evolution, and our ‘seeded’ origins all combine to form a new, religious outlook on life.”

Patty Tunnicliffe

Question: Why is it ( the stationary Earth truth ) important?

Answer: A stationary Earth = automatically means that stars orbit Earth once each Sidereal Day ( 23hrs 56min 4sec )

= no 14 billion light year radius of universe

= no 14 billion year age of universe

= destroys time needed for EVOLUTION MYTH

= entire world’s “knowledge” based on “science falsely so called” is exposed as a colossal DECEPTION

= restores Bible credibility

= widespread efforts to follow Bible’s rules including belief in afterlife with system of magnified rewards and punishments

= existing “crime” ( sin ) rate collapses. WAKE-UP ICR ( Institute for Creation Research ) and AiG ( Answers in Genesis )!!! More HERE.

If the Earth were going around the Sun, then the speed of the satellite would have to adjust due to the different gravitational pull of the Earth. When the satellite is behind the Earth it would have to “chase” the Earth. When in front of Earth, the Earth would chase the satellite. Since the Earth is supposedly going around the Sun with the speed of 107,534 km/hr, the speed of the satellite would have to DRASTICALLY change to account for the change of the gravity pull.

If the universe revolves around the Earth, Earth’s gravitational pull on the satellite would be the same regardless of its position on the orbit. Furthermore, the Sun and Moon’s gravities acting on Earth would balance. The Sun is bigger but farther. The Moon is smaller but closer.

1. The Earth doesn’t have centrifugal force. Gravity is the same all over the Earth because the Earth doesn’t move. If it did, the centrifugal force would make objects weigh TWICE less on Equator than for example in Vancouver, Canada.

2. Doing the same experiment with a SOUND WAVE fortunately can check this. Doppler’s effect would apply.

3. Michelson-Morley experiment doesn’t indicate that the light travels with the same speed independent of Earth’s motion. It indicates that the Earth is stationary.

4. Microwave radiation is 2.7 all over the Earth because the Earth doesn’t move.

5. Weight of objects would be affected depending on which side of the Earth they would be. The “density distribution” theory wouldn’t help, because it would have to change non-stop as the Earth rotates. If the weight of objects is not changing with the location on Earth, then the centrifugal force couldn’t possibly make the Earth bulge at the equator. That proves Newton wrong.

6. The Earth doesn’t have its “density” distributed so exactly as to ideally match the centrifugal force. Such argument is self-serving, arbitrary and logically invalid because there is no evidence to measure it and therefore to support it.

( Note Earth’s “density” for which there is no evidence other than that it “has to be this way” ).

7. The shapes of “constellations” don’t change over thousands of years.

8. Earth is the only planet with millions of life forms. The Bible mentions only life on Earth.

9. Only humans are capable of having a “point of view”, therefore it’s OUR point of view that matters as CENTRAL.

10. Copernicus didn’t provide evidence to support his theory.

11. Contrary to Copernicus, it’s not mathematically possible to “calculate” if the Earth is revolving around the Sun.

12. Newton’s thought experiment with a bucket of water, indicates that the Earth is not revolving. ( The water should sway if the Earth was revolving ). That’s a classic example of lack of centrifugal force of supposedly rotating Earth.

Now we know that the Earth is not flattened on the top and bottom. If that was true, objects would weigh differently.

13. On time-delayed pictures of stars, the Polaris star almost doesn’t move. The only way it can work is if both the Earth and Polaris don’t move. The Earth is therefore the centre of the universe and Polaris is its end.

14. The circular movement of stars on time-delayed pictures cannot be created by Earth’s rotation. If the Earth revolved the paths of stars would be horizontal not circular.

15. Satellites go around the Earth because the space around revolves, thus acting on satellites. You can even put a can of Coca Cola and make it a satellite.

16. The constellations don’t change, year after year.

17. Heavenly bodies don’t collapse together, because their attraction is perfectly balanced by equal centrifugal force resulting from revolving around the Earth.

18. The universe is found to expand AWAY from the Earth with EQUAL speed, that means that the Universe STARTED from the Earth.

19. God started to create the Universe from the Earth, why would a Perfect Being put it later somewhere else? Wouldn’t he put it where it was supposed to be right away? He is perfect so why would He NOT start from the CENTER, as the center is perfectly balanced and therefore requires less effort to start there. By the way, did I mention that the Bible says that God created the sphere of the Earth and hang it on nothing? That was when no human could imagine the Earth hanging on nothing.

The Bible also says that the Earth is MOTIONLESS. Since rotation is “motion” and there is no motion, hence the Earth doesn’t rotate.

The Earth’s horizontal rotation would create horizontal paths of stars. ( Pic.4 )

However, what we see is this. ( Pic.5 )

Polaris Effect: On several time-delayed pictures there are shown circulating stars. Supposedly, because of the Earth’s movement around its own axis. However, their circulation is in the wrong direction…

If the Earth is moving around, then the stars should “move” horizontally, with slight bent upwards on northern hemisphere and a slight bent downwards on southern hemisphere. That’s because the Earth is a sphere. The stars should appear to move in the opposite direction to Earth’s movement.

In fact, the stars are moving in a circle, around the star Polaris. Hence, “Polaris Effect”. The stars on the outside of Polaris move faster. It is because the distance they travelled is bigger. They also move in unison, which proves that they are somehow connected.

To make it even more puzzling, the time interval of the film exposure does not match the part of the circle that the star would travel in that part of day. I mean if the time exposure is 4 hours, then if 24 hours is full circle then 4 hours should be one sixth of the full circle. However, it’s only about 1/12. The direction of stars’ rotation seems to be the same as Earth’s… If Earth is turning from left to right, then the stars should appear to turn from right to left! If the stars move from left to right, then Earth may be stationary. The Polaris star is always stationary. The only way a point can remain stationary, is when both the observer and the point are stationary, or both move in unison. Since the other stars move in unison relative to the Earth, then both Polaris and Earth must be motionless!

Mars-Landing DECEPTION!! – They Are Really In Australia

Never tested on Earth:

This artist’s concept depicts NASA’s Phoenix Mars Lander a moment before its 2008 touchdown on the arctic plains of Mars. Pulsed rocket engines control the spacecraft’s speed during the final seconds of descent.

NASA

“As expected, The Big Bang Evolution Paradigm Express has gone to afterburners after several years of planting escalating Gee Whiz expectations in the media. If ever there was a computer-generated montage of “images”, these Mars “pictures” HERE take the cake……………

Incredible pictures of Mars – and they look surprisingly like some parts of Earth

By David Derbyshire

Last updated at 11:47 AM on 16th July 2008

Ever since Victorian astronomers pointed their telescopes towards Mars and wrongly believed they had discovered canals, mankind has been obsessed by the red planet.

Now these astonishing new images – captured by a European spacecraft in orbit around Mars – are helping to fuel that fascination.

They show in astonishing detail a network of giant valleys, vast plains and towering waterfalls carved into the surface of our neighbouring planet, millions of miles away.

And while Mars today appears lifeless and parched, they are a reminder of how its surface was shaped by fast flowing streams, rivers and oceans.

The pictures were captured by the European Space Agency’s Mars Express Probe – a spacecraft the size of a large fridge-freezer that has been circling Mars since Christmas 2003.

More…

* Life on Mars? Crystal clear images which give us our best ever view of the red planet: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1022265/Dramatic-new-imag…

* Revealed: The time capsule DVD left on Mars for future Martians … that includes ‘Mars Attacks’ and ‘War of the Worlds’: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1022306/Revealed-The-time…

Mars Express infamously gave Britain’s ill-fated Beagle 2 probe a lift to Mars. While that mission ended in disaster, the Mars Express has been a fantastic success.

Over the last five years its stereo, high resolution camera has taken thousands of images of the surface, revealing the planet’s awe inspiring beauty in unprecedented detail.

The latest images show the Echus Chasma, a vast valley just north of Mars equator around 62 miles long and six miles wide. The feature is cut into a high plateau and its steep-sided cliffs – some 12,000 feet high – bear a striking resemblance to the canyons of North America.

Thunderous waterfalls may have once plunged over these cliffs, from the high Lunea Planum plateau that surrounds the Echus Chasma, on to the valley floor below.

Some of the images show a five mile wide impact crater formed when asteroids – lumps of floating rock in space – smashed into Mars. Others show a 15 mile long dyke formed when molten rock, evidence of Mars’s volcanic past.

At the edges of the main valley lie smaller light-coloured tributary valleys or “sapping canyons” – around six miles long and 1800 feet deep.

The Echus Chasma – described by Nasa as one of the largest water sources on the planet – is connected to a much bigger valley system called the Kasei Valles which extends thousands of miles to the north.

Both valleys are impressive – but are dwarfed by an even larger canyon which lies to the south. The Valles Marineris is four miles deep in places, around 120 miles wide and 2,500 miles long.

The images were created by combining pictures taken from different orbits. The images can be viewed from different angles in three dimensions

Mars Express launched in June 2003. The craft is a cube around 5ft by 6ft by 5ft with two 60ft long radar antennae. It is photographing the entire surface of Mars in high resolution, producing a detailed colour map of the minerals on the surface, mapping the atmosphere and probing beneath the surface using radar.

Interest in Mars is at an all time high. Nasa and ESA have announced plans to bring back rocks and soil samples from Mars, while Nasa has three probes on the planet – two rovers and its Phoenix polar lander, which arrived in May.

The Phoenix has scraped ice from beneath the surface of Mars and is analysing samples in its laboratory to see if the planet has the right chemicals needed for life.

In 2013, ESA is planning to launch ExoMars – a robotic rover than will explore the planet’s surface. If successful, it will be Europe’s first mission to the Martian surface.

Scientists unveiled plans on Monday to bring back rocks from the Red Planet as a preliminary step to putting a man on Mars.

Professor Monica Grady, at the Open University, co-chaired the expert panel that wrote the mission proposal.

She said it was a vital next step before considering a crewed mission.

‘If you can’t bring a rock back you are not going to be able to bring people back,’ she said.

Posted in Fake Mars, Planets | Tagged , , | 1 Comment