Hypocrisy of the UK’s Stand on the Russian Spy Incident
When Theresa May and Gavin Williamson attack Russia on the poisoning of an ex-spy, Sergi Skripal, and the poisoning of his daughter. They say that this is break of international law that poison was used on the people in the UK.
So, let’s look at some facts.
Some unknown poison was used to kill there two people. Though now it is believed that they know what is it. The fact is, that the compliant is that they were poisoned by Novichok. I’m sure that there would be the same complaints if they were killed in any other matter. So, what we have to look at is the following:
1 Has the UK done anything like this to other people in other countries?
2 Has the UK done anything like this to their own people?
3 Has any allied of the UK done that that they never criticised?
The answer to the first question is, “yes,” the UK has. Take a look at what they have done in Iraq and other Mid Eastern countries of the world. Do you think that they will tell what they have done in their own newspapers? Do you think that MI 6 will tell of their dirty secrets? Of course not! In fact, it might be on the books that the UK will not use biological weapns, but laws are usually broken by secret agencies.
I’m not sure if Britain has used depleted uranium but we know that the United States have; they have used deplete uranium in Iraq and Afghanistan. This is just as bad if not worse than the biological agent that was used. This is a poison (radiation) that keeps on killing. It contributes to birth deformities and it causes cancer to those who were exposed it.
So, even if the US was engaged in this but not the UK, the answer to question 3 above is, that they do not criticise the US; they have not expel government officials or have an embargo against the US. Why not? Because there is an agenda – in fact several agendas.
Take a look at what the US did in Vietnam by using Agent Orange. They said it was a defoliant, which is true, but it’s a very toxic poison to humans. The US government knew this in advance, as all manufactures have to reveal the harmful effects. The military has to know the side effects of any chemical agent they use. This is a poison used in other nations. This is like the Russian double agent that was poisoned. The only difference is that it was done in another country.
To answer question 2, “has the British government used poisons on their own people?” You bet they have, and was and is much, much worse than what Russian did (if they are responsible). This poisoning is being done on the whole population and it goes on just about every day of the year and has been going on for years. What is it? It’s the chemical spraying with toxic substances known as bioengineering or chemtrails.
Don’t say this is different. It’s only different in the application, the people used on, who is doing it, places and time. This is not pointed out. In fact, Theresa May and company will deny such spraying is going on despite the evidence we have to the contrary.
The US is doing bioengineering, too. They are doing it in other countries AND other countries are doing this to themselves. You can be sure that the UK is also doing this where they have military bases. Here are the facts for this:
- The UK has a military base in Cyprus.
- The US does not have a military base there.
- Cyprus do not have an air force.
- There are chemtrails in the sky over Cyprus.
Considering these facts we can proceed from there. So, it’s only the Royal Air Force that is spraying (poisoning) the Cypriots. This is illegal; they are guilty of what they are accusing Russia of; this is poisoning of a whole population not just a couple of people.
The poisoning of the sky in Cyprus has been brought to the attention of the media there, it has been brought to the attention of the appropriate government department in Nicosia, but what can they do? Cyprus does not have the air force to shot down these jets. They wouldn’t anyhow, because they are a small country AND the most of the members of Parliament have been bought off, too.
Therefore, the British Government is involved in poisoning other people in other countries. We have also learned that they do it to their own people in their own country. There is another agenda which will take another long article, so I will have to write on that later. In the meantime, I’ll focus on this topic.
What has the British Government done? They deny such practices are occurring. Isn’t this what they are complaining about Russia – that they deny it? The UK Government has done the same thing and they are denying it is being done.
Since government creates international incidents, which they have admitted to, and when there is an agenda to meet, they create an incident. Or, if one is really done by another country, they act like they have never done anything like this. With that in mind, it would be very easy for MI6 to have done it (or any other agency within the government). After all, you can be sure that the British military has their biological poisons, including the one that was used on Mr. Sergi Skripal. How can the public know IF some special forces within the UK military done it? It would be very easy to have some UK agent go up to that spy, poison him and then blame it on Russia. No one would be the wiser.
Notice how quick the blame was put on Russia when there was no proof! There still is no proof. The chemical lab in England now knows what biological chemicals were used, and they say that Russia had this since the 1980s (one report said from the 1970s). But so would other nations have this. Or they could have other chemicals.
Theresa May admits that it could have escaped from some lab in Russia. So, there is admittance by her that there is a possibility that the Russian Government was not involved. But the fact is, that in an incident like this easy for the UK government to do it and blame it on Russia.
Why Would Russia Kill An Agent This Way?
Why would the Russian Government kill a person this way if they wanted to hide the fact that they did it? It would be the last thing that they would do if what was used was something only the military had. They would not use a biological agent that would point to a government. They would not use any advanced weapon, either, that only a government would have. What Russia would do IF they did it, they would arrange for a car accident. They would arrange to make it look like a suicide. This has been used by governments around the world and they use these ordinary methods so as NOT to case suspicion on themselves. YET, what was used would point a finger at the government.
Russia could do the same thing to the British Government of having a Brit living in Russia killed. The Prime Minister wouldn’t like it, the people wouldn’t like it. But, you can prove a negative.
So, the question is, who would use something that even layperson can see that a government agency, another spy agency was involved? It would have to be used by the government who plans to blame another nation on it. They would get their biological poison out, something that only the military would have, use it and blame it on the country they chose.
The UK could just as easily blame it on the United States. You can be sure they are likely to have Novichok. It was not blamed on the US because they are a close allie and the agenda is to bring down Russia. But looking at the facts, there is no more proof of Russia doing it than the US – as both have this biological weapons. Of course, neither country will admit to possessing something that is banned by a treaty that they signed. So, in a court of law, there is no evidence. Yet Theresa May, Boris Johnson, Gavin Williamson are acting like Judge, Jury and Executioner.
In a court of law you would need evidence and this is not evidence. It’s like saying a guy was shot with a 38 calibre bullet and blaming it on a neighbour who has a Smith and Wesson 38. You need to get more evidence such as the rifling. If they don’t have that, there will have to be other evidence to proceed further. Yet, this is what we are expect to believe.
We are told of the biological chemical used (Novichok). Fine. But that is not enough. In this case, Gavin Williamson, Secretary of Defence, would have find out what other countries have this chemical – including the UK! First, do you think that the UK will tell you this if it’s banned? Do you think other countries will tell Mr. Williamson or Mrs. May? No! Do you think MI6 is that well connected that they would know all the secret military stock in the world? Heck no! So, how do you build a case on this?
This is all theory on my part but here is something to consider. Admittedly, just any nation would admit they had biological weapons, since most nations would have signed a treaty banning this. So, just because Russia first developed this, doesn’t mean that other nations have done so since the 1980s! But Britain would be prime suspect because they have an on-going dispute with Russia. For those who say why would Britain do it since this agent gave secret information to MI6? The answer would be that this agent served his usefulness. And if you really want to start a war (of whatever kind), you would have to make it look good. The British Government just could not target any ordinary Russian living in the UK, as this would not make any sense. So, they got someone whom Russia would be interested in having killed. When you have government who have no Christian morals, this is what can be expected, a government could kill an innocent person if it fills a need to do so.
When Theresa May’s, “This is an attack on our nation,” this is another lie. IF Russia did it, it can not be consider at attack on the nation. It simply was an attack on an individual (though a couple of other people were harmed, too). This is not the equivalent of spraying the population with barium, aluminium, lithium, etc., that we see over head. That is an attack on the nation. But I guess this is OK because it’s being done by our own government!
Some Added Thoughts
We know how dirty governments operate and how they can set up individuals and other governments to look like they did something wrong. Case in point: The Gulf of Tonkin in Vietnam, 9-11, false flag school shootings, and now this case with a Russian double agent being poisoned. We all know how the intelligence agencies have their black operations. So, here is a theory of mine:
After the fall of Communism there were a lot of things that were made known and also inventions that were for sale. It would be easy for MI6 or the CIA to have purchased the Novichok compound and bring it back to the UK. Then, when the occasion arose, to use this and blame it on Russia. This happens all the time by the above mentioned spy agencies. So, this substance “might” have the finger prints of Russia but that does not prove they did it.
Here is another thought: Then, there could be the completely false flag where they got a known agent that Russia would be interesting in (to make it look good). Then FAKE it that he and his daughter were poisoned (along with a passer-by and a policeman. Give big media coverage and grandstanding speeches in Parliament and blame it on Russia.
We know of the lies they have done before. In fact, here is a rare example where the UK Government ADMITTED they lied and that was when they said Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. This was when Tony Blare was PM. Both the US and the UK were so cock-sure that Saddam Hussein had these weapons that it went on week after week in the media (just like we are hearing today about Russia).
But did they pull out of Iraq? Did they offer compensation to the Iraqis? No!
Again, all the public has to do on is the word that the government and media says. And don’t forget, “they never lie!” Yea, sure!
There simply is no logic used at all. And there certainly is no Christian moral standards used. It’s about time we get back to those standards.