“Everything evil in the world, related to democide … comes from Geneva.” That’s a quote from Pascal Najadi, a former banker and son of World Economic Forum (WEF) cofounder Hussain Najadi, who claims his father left the WEF “out of disgust” in the early ‘80s.1 Hussain, founder of AmBank, one of the largest banks in Malaysia, was assassinated in Ceylon in 2013.
Most Americans, including Christians, do not know the historical significance of Thanksgiving Day in America. This report will tell you what the antichrists do not want you to know.
We are told what the ancient Israelites were to do with other people and their idol worship. God never changes; a lesson for today.
Before 2012, if you had voiced suspicions that the Australian government had been anything but open and honourable in dealing with East Timor – its newly independent but impoverished neighbour – you would likely have been dismissed as a conspiracy theorist. But it was then revealed Australian Secret Intelligence Service agents had bugged East Timor’s cabinet office during treaty negotiations over oil and gas fields.
Yesterday’s conspiracy theories often become today’s incontrovertible facts. In the mid-1990s, journalist Gary Webb’s claims that CIA officials conspired with drug dealers bringing crack cocaine into the United States were dismissed by many as a prime example of a conspiracy theory. But the claims were true.
It’s reasonable to suppose many of the views that are now dismissed or mocked as conspiracy theories will one day be recognised as having been true all along. Indeed, the net effect of terms such as “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracism” is to silence people who are the victims of conspiracy, or who (rightly or wrongly) suspect conspiracies may be occurring. These terms serve to herd respectable opinion in ways that suit the interests of the powerful.
Ever since the philosopher Sir Karl Popper popularised the expression in the 1950s, conspiracy theories have had a bad reputation. To characterise a belief as a conspiracy theory is to imply it’s false. More than that, it implies people who accept that belief, or want to investigate whether it’s true, are irrational.
On the face of it, this is hard to understand. After all, people do conspire. That is, they engage in secretive or deceptive behaviour that is illegal or morally dubious.
Conspiracy is a common form of human behaviour across all cultures throughout recorded time, and it has always been particularly widespread in politics.
Virtually all of us conspire some of the time, and some people (such as spies) conspire virtually all of the time. Given people conspire, there can’t be anything wrong with believing they conspire. Hence there can’t be anything wrong with believing conspiracy theories or being a conspiracy theorist.
Thinking of conspiracy theories as paradigmatically false and irrational is like thinking of phrenology as a paradigm of scientific theory. Conspiracy theories, like scientific theories, and virtually any other category of theory, are sometimes true, sometimes false, sometimes held on rational grounds, sometimes not.
It’s a striking feature of much of the literature on conspiracy theories, like much of the literature on terrorism, that authors assume they are referring to the same phenomenon, while a glance at their definitions (when they bother to offer them) reveals they are not.
But seeking a fixed definition of the term “conspiracy theory” may be an idle pursuit, since the real problem with the term is that, although it lacks a fixed meaning, it does serve a fixed function.
A new Inquisition?
It’s a function similar to that served by the term “heresy” in medieval Europe.
In both cases these are terms of propaganda, used to stigmatise and marginalise people who have beliefs that conflict with officially sanctioned or orthodox beliefs of the time and place in question.
If, as I believe, the treatment of those labelled as “conspiracy theorists” in our culture is analogous to the treatment of those labelled as “heretics” in medieval Europe, then the role of psychologists and social scientists in this treatment is analogous to that of the Inquisition.
Outside the psychology and social science literature some authors will sometimes offer some, usually heavily qualified, defence of conspiracy theories (in some sense of the term). But among psychologists and social scientists the assumption that they are false, the product of an irrational (or nonrational) process, and positively harmful is virtually universal.
Whenever we use the terms “conspiracy theory”, “conspiracism” or “conspiracist ideation”, we’re implying, even if we don’t mean to, there is something wrong with believing, wanting to investigate, or giving any credence at all to the possibility people are engaged in secretive or deceptive behaviour.
One bad effect of these terms is they contribute to a political environment in which it’s easier for conspiracy to thrive at the expense of openness. Another bad effect is their use is an injustice to the people who are characterised as conspiracy theorists.
Following the philosopher Miranda Fricker, we may call this a form of “testimonial injustice”. When someone asserts that a conspiracy has taken place (especially when it is a conspiracy by powerful people or institutions) that person’s word is automatically given less credence than it should because of an irrational prejudice associated with the pejorative connotations of these terms.
When professional psychologists imply these terms it can constitute a form of gaslighting; that is, a manipulation of people into doubting their own sanity.
I hope and believe that in the future these terms will be widely recognised for what they are: the products of an irrational and authoritarian outlook. Prior to Popper, we got along perfectly well without these terms. I’m sure we can learn to do so again.
Source: The Conversation
We all know what the Zionists are doing to the Palestinians now. They are indiscriminately bombing the Palestinian people and driving them from their land. First, the Israeli Government told those in northern Gaza to move to southern Gaza. Now they want them moved to the Sini Peninsula.
While we are not being bombed by these same people, we are being driven from the land and being made homeless – no question about it!
Let’s look at the real people of the Bible – otherwise known as Caucasians people. I will focus on the past 100 years, though it started earlier than that. The question is, how are we, the Children of Abraham and his decedents being driven off our land like the Palestinians?
If we focus on America for example, millions of people were driven from the land through the Great Depression. Many lost their homes, businesses and farms. Those who found a place to stay moved in apartments.
Then, there are millions who got into debt through the usury/interest banks by taking out mortgages. When people get unemployed for whatever reason, they lose their homes. If they had a business loan and business took a downturn, they lost their source of income and in turn, lost their homes. The same happened to farmers.
Bringing things up to 2023. You’ve heard of all the fires in the past few years in the US where, simultaneously, intense fires start and burned towns. The strangeness of these fires was that homes burned whose remains looked nothing like normal fires. Then, there were trees right next to the properties that were not burned to a cinder. The cars had windows melted and aluminium melted that takes heat much higher than a normal forest fire. Naturally, those who suffered from these fires were driven from their homes.
These were not normal fires but ones that were started by what is called “Direct Energy Weapons” (DEW). The purpose of doing this is so the billionaires can get choice pieces of land without paying high prices.
People who lived in these burnt-out areas are told they can’t return. So, with a home that is completely destroyed and charred land, you can imagine how cheap the super-rich can buy this for. Think of what happened this year in Maui, Hawaii. Again, this is people who were driven off their land.
Also, what we have been hearing in 2023 is that “the powers that be” want to create and have us move into “15-minute cities,” where we would be corralled up like cattle; that we can only work and shop in a radius of 15 minutes from where we live.
We also have witnessed the explosion of homeless people living on the streets, while others, who are still working can’t afford a home or rent an apartment, living in their cars.
All of this points to people driven from their homes like the people in Gaza. And who is behind this? You guessed it! Let me use the word the Edomites. The age-old enemies of Christians and our ancestors before we were called Christians.
We of Christendom have been driven off our land, too.
Get out there and join the demonstrations. The whole world is waking up for the collective attack we are facing. But let us not forget why this is happening in the first place. Just read Leviticus chapter 26 and Deuteronomy chapter 28; therein lies your answer.
This is a message that is very applicable for our time.
Christian Flat Earth Ministry 
