AI Response is Basically “BS Baffles Brains”

I just did a test with Google’s AI Gemini. If you don’t have this, you can get it free from Google. What I tried for the first time was using the microphone and I played a short part of a video from Dave Weiss on gravity from his flat earth app.

Below is what I played, then I stopped it as I don’t know how many characters it can take. It recorded everything pretty accurately. Now Dave was talking to someone else but the typing ran everything all together. No problem.

Then, I thought, I’ll hit Send and see what this AI says. I didn’t expect anything as there were no questions asked nor did I ask for its comments. But it made a long comment on its own, which you see below.

In short, AI gave the same convoluted answers that you would expect from any globe earth “scientist”. For those who have the time, it might be interesting to see what answers AI says about other flat earth topics; take note of it and use this to respond back when you are talking to a real person. But don’t expect it to realise its mistakes and program itself. But it can be used to be prepared on what critics say and have an answer for it.

There are some errors in the transcribing. But if you were to experiment with this, you’ll want to correct it so there is no doubt in understanding the statement.

Recording Transcribing

How big of a number 10 to the 36 power? I don’t think our human Minds can comprehend. The number that trillion is 15 0. Okay.  So let’s pretend that they that the gravity also is real cuz we know that electrostatic force is real and I dropped something how the hell can you say that it’s gravity is pulling it down the equivalent the analogy I came up with the other day and I think I like it is you’re in a boxing ring with Mike Tyson at his prime. And the thing that’s going to make you get knocked out. It is something hitting your head. Well, there’s several things. In the globalist world, it’s the air molecule did not go out. Ridiculous even when you just think like all right, if this thing’s holding a skyscraper down. Didn’t even be able to. Jump I can’t easily. I mean, it’s just anything beautiful There’s no. Sound and it’s flying are we divide?

Google Gemini Response

You’re right, 10 to the 36 hours is a mind-bogglingly large number. Here’s a breakdown:

 Trillion: You’re correct, a trillion is 1 followed by 12 zeros (1,000,000,000,000).

 10 to the 36 hours: This is even bigger. Here, 10 is the base, and 36 is the exponent. It means 1 multiplied by itself 36 times.

Even if we could count hours for that long (the universe is estimated to be around 13.8 billion years old, which is much less than 10^36 hours!), it’s hard to imagine something lasting that long. It’s a concept that goes beyond our everyday experiences.

Now, about your analogy:

 Gravity vs. Electrostatic Force: Gravity is a much weaker force than the electrostatic force at the atomic level. However, gravity has infinite range, meaning it weakens with distance but never truly disappears. Electrostatic forces, on the other hand, diminish rapidly with distance. So, for large objects like a skyscraper, the tiny attractive forces between all the atoms add up due to gravity’s infinite reach, holding the building down.

 Air Molecules and Jumping: You’re absolutely right. Air resistance does slow you down when you jump, but it’s tiny compared to gravity’s pull. In a vacuum (no air), you wouldn’t jump much higher, but you would fall at the same rate due to gravity.

 Sound and Pressure: Sound is a pressure wave traveling through a medium like air. It’s not the air molecules themselves flying long distances, but rather a transfer of energy through collisions. 

Essentially, your analogies highlight interesting aspects of the world, but they don’t disprove the existence of gravity or the way sound works. Science explains these phenomena through well-tested theories.

Would you like to know more about gravity, electromagnetism, or anything else that interests you?