Mike Adams: 10 Insane Things People Believe In

Posted on January 1, 2020 by revealed4you

Mike Adams: 10 Insane Things People Believe In

To see the original article CLICK HERE

  Sorry to have to bring up Mike Adams again but there is an article that was sent out after the last one titled: 10 insane completely irrational things millions of Americans believe

As soon as I saw it, I thought, “I bet he has the flat earth as one of them,” and I was not disappointed. The other nine items, I agree with, such as the belief that vaccines are safe.

Below is part of what Adams wrote, in italics, and below that are my comments.

Insane Belief #5: Flat Earth

Yes, in the year 2020, we still have millions of Americans who quite literally believe the Earth is flat… like a disc floating in space. They also believe the sun and moon are discs, and that satellites don’t exist, and that gravity isn’t real.

In the original article, which Adams has a link to, he did not go into detail about the Sun and Moon discs – much less give our side. That’s the key, “Never give the explanation of your opponent if you want to pull the wool over their eyes.”

And they are rather fanatical about these beliefs, convincing themselves that there is a global conspiracy to silence the truth about the “flat Earth” in order to prevent humans from discovering the edges where you can step off into outer space… or something.

Mike Adams is fanatical about his beliefs of free speech as he went to the expense to set up an alternate to YouTube, as on example. This is good, BUT why criticize others for being fanatical? All we flat earthers are doing is spreading the word via traditional means including the internet, we are doing no harm to anyone.

What flat earther believes that “you will fall off the edge into outer space”? This is putting words into our mouth – which is something that is done by people who can’t argue the facts.

I recently posted a detailed science article explaining what Flat Earthers get wrong about gravity and elliptical orbits, but it doesn’t matter what you say to them: They’re happy to redefine Kepler’s laws of motion, or Newton’s laws, or Einstein’s equations, or whatever it takes to pretend the Earth is a flat disc and all space flight was faked on a green screen stage in Hollywood.

When a “law of physics” is wrong; when it can’t be duplicated, we have a right to expose the pseudo-science, just like he does!

As for the fake space flights, we don’t go to Kepler’s laws of motion, we look at what’s on the screen – along with such things as how can a vacuum exist next to a gaseous atmosphere without resorting to gravity mum-boo-jumbo!

Mike Adams did end this with a compliment to us flat earthers.

Continuing…the Flat Earth movement is all about a “thought experiment,”

Adams claims that we engage in “thought experiments.” Oh really?

Let’s take a closer look at “thought experiments”. I presume that Mike Adams means experiments that you do in your head, that you can only describe in words. Well, it’s obvious that critics do not care to see flat earth videos, if he did, he would see some experiments done, such as having a laser aimed at a boat across the lake and seeing that there is no curve. Or about viewing the skyline of Chicago 30 miles away. What about one that everybody knows – water seeks its own level.

Now, we flat Earth believers do engage in “thought experiments” and there is nothing wrong with that, but critics are not smart enough to figure this out. Let me give you an example: when you talk to someone about the flat earth, you give as one of your reasons that “water seeks its own level.” This we all know. You don’t need a PhD. in physics to know this; you don’t have to demonstrate this to someone. You could, but everyone has this experience.

There are many “thought experiments” that are valid; ones that can be used in a court of law. For example, you can’t stand up to winds of 66,000 mph (what we are suppose to be doing as Earth goes around the Sun. We can’t stand up to even 1,000 mph (our supposed rotation). People know how it feels when there is a hurricane, which, in most cases is only 1/10th of our supposed rotation. Just talking to someone, they can conceptualize it. Now, you have to discount all the hocus-pocus, mum-boo-jumbo of gravity which is suppose to answer these questions. It is gravity that is always theorized, and not what we say.

Thought experiments are USEFUL for:

  • when the knowledge is so common that you don’t need to do an experiment
  • when it’s not practical, such when speaking at a public place
  • when you don’t have the resources such as a lab and equipment
  • that the experiment can not be done in a lab because of size

Many experiments can be shown on a video, but this might be considered by flat earth critics of a “thought experiment.” But these “thought experiments” are perfectly OK for someone who is a spinning globe Earth believer!

At the beginning of Mike Adams article (see link above) he said that there are millions of believers in the “10 insane things people believe in.” Speaking for the flat Earth belief only, this is good news! It’s also good news that it came to the attention of Adams – as some people will wake up and see that he is wrong and flat earthers are right. And, they might learn this on his video hosting platform 😉

Keep spreading the word you guys – as the flat earth truth message is getting out there.

Make the year 2020 a great one!

Posted in flat earth critic | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Mike Adams: Critic of Flat Earthers

Posted on January 1, 2020 by revealed4you

Mike Adams: Critic of Flat Earthers

 

CLICK HERE for the full article.

  Mike Adams of Natural News came up with another dozy of an article! This one is attacking flat earth believers. You can go to the above link to read the full article. Below is my comments on what he wrote; his comments are in italics.

First, I do want to give credit to Mike Adams for allowing flat earth videos on his video hosting site at: Brighteon.com

Mike starts off by comparing flat earth belief to Joe Biden and his comments on guns – it’s really a poor analogy but anyhow…

We are accused that flat earthers have a poor understanding of the laws of physics. As you know, it’s just the other way around. In this article, Adams goes on and on about gravity, yet even the advocates of gravity doesn’t know how it works. So, how does Adams know?!

Similarly, Flat Earthers really don’t care how gravity works, either, and some of them deny the existence of gravity altogether. Trying to explain gravity to a Flat Earth advocate is a pointless exercise. They will argue for the existence of an entirely different set of laws that govern the universe, even though their laws are not consistent with observable reality.

Sure, we deny gravity altogether as it doesn’t exist! So, why should we pretend. But with all this talk about gravity, Mike Adams never once mentions what we DO talk about and that is, bouncy or the law of density! This takes the place of gravity. You know the simple law of physics known as “anything heavier than air falls.” If he did, the readers will know that flat earthers talk about physics.

Their latest argument — which they claim is “proof” the Earth is flat — centres around the claim that since the planet is in a slightly elliptical orbit around the sun, the changes in Earth’s velocity relative to the sun as it traverses this elliptical orbit is “proof” that the planet is accelerating and decelerating in a way that you should be able to feel.

What flat earth believer says Earth is a planet, and that we move around the sun? We don’t!

We know that if you are moving and there is no change of speed, you won’t feel the speed BUT you will be blown off the Earth! And, not only blown off the Earth but at the speeds that we are told we are traveling (such as 66,000 miles an hour around the Sun, Earth itself will not be here). Again, Mike doesn’t mention this!

I tend to think of Flat Earthers as being passionate but misinformed. They aren’t stupid, or evil or insane, but they do lack the kind of basic science education that I was taught in high school. They’re also not very good thinkers, generally speaking, because critical thinking combined with some simple observations would convince any rational person that the Earth isn’t flat.

It’s the flat earth critics that lack basic science education. Mike knows about junk science when it comes to health but he thinks that the Establishment tells the truth when it comes to the universe. As far as observation, it is the flat earthers that tells others about “observations” – of what our senses tell us. Our GOD GIVEN senses tell us that the earth is flat and stationary!

It is not rational to believe that just because NASA is lying about the existence of microbial life on Mars, therefore NASA must have faked every space mission, moon landing and photograph of the Earth from space.

Since Mike Adams believes that NASA lied about microbial life on Mars, how does he believe that there is life on “planets” we haven’t even seen? (He does believe in Aliens.)

Because I don’t call Flat Earthers idiots, from time to time they invite me to “debate” them on Flat Earth theory. This, too, is pointless…

Why doesn’t he debate us? After all, if he has the truth, why not debate us? Well, Adams gives us the same brush off that he is given when he is willing to debate those who support vaccines, GMO food – they GIVE HIM the brush off and says “it’s pointless.” That means the medical doctors can’t debate him and win, just like Adams can’t debate a flat earther and win.

Mike also calls flat earthers fanatics. I guess this is suppose to be bad. Dying for what you believe in is the most fanatical you can be, right? Well, Christ died for what He believed in, so did the Apostles, the Prophets of old and even Christian from the time of Christ up to today. So, being a fanatic is suppose to be bad? Adams is accused of being a fanatic by the medial profession. Does he not do what he can to get the truth out about vaccines, GMO food, chemtrails, chemicals in our food? You bet he does! So, a flat earth tries to the best he/she can to get the truth out.

Adams owns some guns and is willing to defend his life, which implies that he is willing to die for what he believes in. Of course, it’s better to get the enemy to die for what they they believe in 😉

If defending the globe earth model wasn’t enough, he believes that Aliens gets here by bending space/time. And if that isn’t far fetched enough, wait until you read on…

In Mike Adams latest post, which was made New Years Eve 2019, he says in one article that stars are missing in the universe and claims that Aliens are using this to fuel their travels through space; that they actually use up stars for their energy to travel throughout the galaxy! He goes on to say that we will someday do the same thing!

I haven’t even heard this among the si-fi stories and films out there! I guess someone on Earth got a message from Aliens that told him this is what they do! Lol. IF Extraterrestrials exists, as Adams believes, how does he know they are telling the truth? Has he thought of other possibilities of stars not being in the sky – without going to this wild conclusion? Such as:

  • they faded out
  • some stars falling to Earth (as the Bible says, and in which he says he believes in)
  • that NASA just altered a picture and lied about it

Adams has in his article about warping space/time and using pulsar stars for energy as one picture (CGI) showed. In one frame, a set of stars and in another, one star is missing. So, this is proof that a star is missing! “Hey, Mike, I can make a whole galaxy disappear!” If this was issued from NASA and a story was given along with it, that Aliens are storing this for energy, this would make a great article – according to him.

How can even globe earth believers swallow this? Or was just Mike Adams and a few others fell for this BULL! For those who believe that Aliens are using the power of the stars to propel their space ships, there are some other major problems; there are some things that make it wilder than believing in gravity, they are:

  • How do they store this huge amount of energy?
  • How can a ship be large enough to store it?
  • How can the container not melt?
  • What about the weight?
  • It would too heavy to move.
  • Finally, with carrying such large amount of mass, according to gravity theorists, it would attract planets and smaller suns as they fly by; attracting them to the space ship and destroying the ship itself.

Well, this is the most fantasy BS I’ve ever heard!

As a side note, one day stars will disappear but not because some Extraterrestrials will be using it for fuel, but what God said. We are told that at the end of the age, the stars will fall from heaven. Which tells us that they are just lights, that they are small and that it will NOT destroy the Earth. But in the meantime, this is just another CGI lie from NASA.

In other words, if the universe worked the way Flat Earthers describe it, the universe as we know it would have never come into existence in the first place.

How would Adams know? Is he the Creator? Was he given the secret of how God made Earth? In other words, it sounds like Adams believes in the Big Bang Theory of the start of life and not that God SPOKE Creation into existence.

In Mike Adams own words (hold on to your seats), Additionally, I’ve proposed ideas on harvesting pulsars and magnetars to produce antimatter fuel which would be necessary to power warp bubble projection systems. This also explains the economics of the cosmos and why pulsars and similar collapsed stars are so valuable as the “cosmic oil wells” for intragalactic travel.

Yea, “cosmic oil wells!” And where are these “oil wells” stored? On some planet that is larger than the star? If this was possible, how would this aid spaceships that are 1,000 light years away?

This means there is enormous competition for energy sources such as stars in their various forms (i.e. pulsars), and that there are very likely star eaters in our cosmos — civilizations that literally consume entire stars to achieve greater conquest and territory.

If this was the case, why hasn’t there been “missing” stars since man has been looking through telescopes?

Dream on Mike Adams, dream on!

In Summary

If you read Mike Adams article at the link above, you’ll notice certain things that are common to people who don’t want to research the other side to see if it’s the truth or not; not just about the flat earth but also topics that are close to Adam’s heart, too.

Mike Adams did the same thing that others do to him that refuse to listen, they are:

  • setting up a “straw man” so he can easily knock down the argument
  • not bringing up other topics that flat earthers believe in
  • using an example that most flat earthers don’t use (acceleration of the Earth)
  • accusing the other side of what you do yourself are guilty of (re: physics)
  • not debating your opponent (“it’s pointless”)
  • not doing adequate research which included seeing videos on the flat earth

If you were to use the above tactics, you could make up any wild story and make the other person look wrong and you right! You do this by controlling the conversation, or, in this case, the article. Make wild assertions, ignore what the other person believes in, and end by saying you are right! So, this is how you make flat earthers wrong.

IF, and that is a big IF, Mike Adams sees that he is wrong, will he admit it? Who knows. But one thing we do know is, that well known people who are identified with holding a certain position on any topic and changes rarely admits they are wrong. It takes guts to do so. If that person has many followers because they believe him, they will not want to risk losing their followers, which many of them are also his customers. The whole issue will no longer be discussed with the hope that their people will forget it.

Posted in flat earth critic, flat earth discussion, gravity exposed | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Eyes to See, Body That Feels and Brain to Think, part 1

Posted on December 31, 2019 by revealed4you

water on a ball

THE ENLIGHTENMENT OF THE WORLD

by Mr. John G. Abizaid

Note: This booklet was originally printed in 1910; this came from the 2rd addition in 1912.The grammar and the punctuational is the same as in the original.

Chapter 1

About the Water

You have eyes to see, body that feels and brain to think.

Christians believe the Bible. In this Book of Holy Writ are proofs given by the prophets that the world is flat and stationary, and the sun, moon and stars are always in motion.

There are many, however, who do not accept the truths of the Bible, and for this reason I give other proofs.

There are some things that need witnesses, but other truths are their own witnesses; they bear the proof in themselves.

You know that there is more water on the earth than dry land. Here is the first proof:

The water proves that the earth is flat, level and stationary. Water is liquid. It runs always down and seeks its level, and never runs up unless by power. And the water of the ocean is every way pretty near joined together on the earth, and they call it liquid. It will not stay on a round earth. Take a glass of water and pour it on a round ball and if the water stays on, then the earth must be round, but if the water falls off the earth must be flat.

This is the proof: Take a pan and fill it with water and see if it is higher in the center than on the sides. If this is true, then the water of the ocean might be round, but if the water in the pan is flat and level, then the water of the ocean must also be flat and level.

The water of the ocean is level and can be nothing else, because it is liquid, which proves that the land is flat and not round. The land is not exactly flat and level, for there are mountains and valleys. But it makes no difference, for if the mountains were in the valleys it would leave the land flat and level and higher than the water. I have been thinking of the question for a long time.

At last I have found out for myself and the water and the sunbeams, the sun’s rising, the sunlight, etc., that the earth cannot be round and in motion, as books and teaches have taught. The teachers offer proofs to show that the earth is round but the proofs they offer amount to nothing. When the children go to school, the teacher tells them the world is round, and, of course, they believe it, and they do not ask how it is round. They are young and they know very little. When they grown up they still believe the earth is round and in motion, and so in turn they teach this to others.

The water is flat, which proves that the earth is flat and stationary.

From its fruit you will know what kind of a tree it is.

You can tell by looking at a building whether it has a good foundation or not.

The sun cannot throw the earth’s shadow on the moon, because sometimes they are very near to each other. This you can tell in the evening and in the morning by seeing the moon and the sun at the same time.

You ought not to believe everything the professors say, because they do not know everything.

The man who said that the earth was proved round by the sight of a row of ships upon the ocean made a mistake, and what he says is not true.

Just because he measured and looked at the subject in his own way, he has not proved it but guessed at it. From this guess he thought the land and water around; but the water will not stay round, as he thinks.

They claim in the geographies that when the last ship is out of sight, it is a proof that the water is round, but it is a proof that the water is flat. You will see if you look and measure in a good many different ways, as is done in this book.

A person standing on the shore sees a steamer full size when it is near him, but when it goes out father it keeps growing smaller until it is out of sight. They think this is good proof that the water of the ocean is round, but it is not a good proof, because water is liquid and will not stay round. The distance view shows you that. It is the same as with a book; you cannot read it five yards away from your face, but near your face you can read it plainly.

This is the Law of Perspective. Ed.

law of perspective  A person standing on the seashore will see a large steamer, but as it goes out father it grows smaller, and the mast of the steamer will be shorter, too; but if a person stood on the opposite shore he would see the steamer large when near him as it goes out father it grows smaller, which proof that the water is flat and level and not round: the far distance will show you that.

There is no chance for anybody to say that the earth is round, for as long as the water is flat and level and stationary, and the sun in motion.

I have read books on geography, and I find they claim that the earth is round and in motion.

I have been thinking over this matter, and have read considerable in regard to the subject.

I do not blame children or teachers, but the first man who said the earth is round. He told the people the earth was round, but did not know for sure; he only guessed at it. We do not have to believe such guess-work as long as we have eyes to see and bodies to feel and brains to think.

This say the earth is round, both land and water, and that they are always moving around the sun. but if you ask them how the water keeps in its bed while the earth is turning, they will tell you to take a pail of water and swing it fast and see, for the water will not come out until the pail is slowed down.

Who has seen the earth turn around in the way that a person turns a pail? No one. And as long as no one has ever seen the earth turn, you need not believe that it does so.

Who is turning the earth? It is turning on its axis and what kind of an axis is it? No one knows. Is it iron, steel, wood or in? You do not want to believe such statements that the earth is standing on an axis, for no one has seen it. It is all guess-work and nothing seen by human beings. Some people say that the world is round and that God is turning the world, but very few believe it. If they do they should pay attention to his prophecies, and ought to believe them as they say about the movement of the sun and standing of the earth, and so forth. If you wish to know what the earth stands on, I can say, that, and I believe what I say, the earth rests on water just like a ship floats on the water. This is a good proof without doubt. It know the earth is large, and being so tremendously large, must necessarily be of tremendous weight. And as a heavy body, it has no power to move in the sky around the sun anywhere. Also it cannot lay or turn on nothing as they think. Try something and let us see if you can make anything stand or turn daily on nothing itself. I am sure you cannot do that. Also they have no right proof to it as they believe. The swing of the pail is not a correct proof either, because the man swings the pail. But the pail cannot swing itself because it has no power. Also the earth cannot move on nothing because it has no power to move.

Try and put some water on the outside of a pail, and I am sure you will see the water of the ocean is the same thing, for if the earth is round as they say, there would be no water on the earth, as all of it would fall off.

If the earth is round and revolving we should feel it; also the wind would be coming from one direction only, and not from the north, south, east and west.

I have read a story in the geography about the earth being round, as they claim. It says when the ship is near the shore a person on the shore will see the mast, high and big, but as the ship goes further out, he will see it low and smaller as if it were going down hill. If a man were standing on the steamer deck, however, he would see the land low, while he would be high.

If there were any high mountains near the shore, and you were on a steamer some distance from the coast, when you looked toward the land, the mountains would seem to you to be low and small, but they are not. It is the distance that makes them so.

The water is flat and level always and cannot be anything else because it is liquid. You know, of course, what liquid is, and what the word means.

Here is another proof to show that the water of the ocean is flat and level: –

Suppose five steamers are in a circle, each just within eyesight of the others, with another steamer in the middle. If you are in the middle steamer looking out at the others, they will look as if they were very low and in a hollow, while you seem to be the highest. But if you were to leave your own steamer and go in turn to all of the others in the circle it would then look to you as if the steamer you were in first were very low.

Whichever steamer you are on seems to you at the time to be the highest. It is not true that one steamer is higher than the other, or that the water of the ocean is round. It is flat, and nearly always straight. It is the distance that makes the other seem lower.

Here is still another proof: It these steamers are in a straight line, on the ocean, as far apart as eye can reach, and you are in the middle one looking at the others on either side, then they will look as if they were in a hollow, while you seem to be the highest; but it is true that to the people on the other steamers it looks as if your ship were low in the water and their own the highest.

I think I have given enough proofs to change your minds about the earth being flat, not round.

The water proves that the land is stationary, flat and level.

Posted in Flat Earth Experiments, Old flat earth news | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Flat Earth and Christ’s Parables

Posted on December 29, 2019 by revealed4you

Flat Earth and Christ’s Parables

We know that Christ spoke in parables when speaking to the multitude but being in parables, the meaning was hidden. The Apostles had to ask what the meaning was and Christ explained it to them. So, why did He speak in such a way to the multitude?

Christ says in Matthew 7:7-8

7 “Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. 8 For everyone who asks receives; the one who seeks finds; and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened.”

In other words, most people are satisfied with just the surface message and that is all. The Apostles were not – they had to learn more. This is the “seeking, asking and knocking of Matthew 7. And with this, Christ gave them the meaning.

Are a person who wants to learn more or are you satisfied with the spoon-fed slop that is fed to you?

I see this as a test for the people – to see if they are interested in learning more. As we can see from Scripture, the multitude – which is most people – were not interested. Do you see this today in trying to tell people the truth of, for example, about flat earth? Do you experience this when trying to tell others about other Bible messages? How about how to stay healthy; of what really happened in NYC on 9-11, etc.?

I’m sure you had times when you talked to people, taking it very slowly to introduce the flat earth to them and what the Bible says. You’ve seen where your friend doesn’t ask any more questions – they show no interest. So, you stop. I know I have introduced the flat earth to people by this method, or just touching lightly on the subject and there is no interest shown in return.

The answer is not that you were not a good enough speaker but that your friend just did not “ask, seek and knock”; they were interested in just what they know, of how the world is already figured out for them.

Christ could just as easily have told them the truth but, by this method, it would show who is just interested and who is not. Human nature has not changed since the beginning of time, and this just goes to show it.

You can find out more by CLICKING HERE for the audio lesson that goes into more detail.

When anyone asks more questions, it shows that they are interested, that they want to learn more. Unfortunately, too many people are not interested. They like their world just as it is, they don’t want to be the “odd one” in their social circle. This goes not only for Bible truths but for anything that they have been lied to about.

God does not open the people’s eyes and ears until they seek His truth. When you seek more, you receive more. I could compare this to looking for gold. Some people are just happy to get a few gold flakes in the river bed. While those who do more work, more digging, find gold nuggets and even veins of gold.

If we reject God’s truths, we can expect to be shut off from all truth. Have we not found this out with our family and friends? They reject the truth that we tell them, they don’t do any research on their own, they don’t ask us more questions, so what happens to them? They believe everything that the lying media, schools and people in authority tell them! In fact, they don’t have to do any thinking at all – it’s all done for them. And, unfortunately, that is how the multitude likes it – they are sheeple.

What will Yahweh, God do to those who will not receive the truth? Read 2 Thessalonian 2:10-12

10 And in all deceivableness of unrighteousness, among them that perish, because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

11 And therefore God shall send them [v]strong delusion, that they should believe lies,

12 That all they might be damned which believed not the truth, but [w]had pleasure in unrighteousness.

Now, I’m not saying that if you don’t believe in the flat stationary earth that you will be domed. I’m not saying that, but what will probably happen is that you will continue to believe in lies. However, talking about the flat earth and those who reject it, notice how they look starry eyed at the CGI images that NASA makes and special effect videos. This is the strong delusion, the lie that they believe in. They also believe in all the political correctness foolishness that is being forced down our collective throats as well.

If people prefer lies, they’ll receive more lies – and believe them! This is what we see today and we can see why by reading 2 Thessalonian chapter 2.

I hope that you can understand why things are the way they are and why some people just don’t want to listen.

Posted in Bible and Flat Earth | Tagged | Leave a comment

Is Donald Trump Really Mocking The Homeless?

Posted on December 27, 2019 by revealed4you

Today’s News…

Is Donald Trump Really Mocking The Homeless?

CLICK HERE for full article.

Notice: There are many things that Trump says and does that I don’t support. But there times when he is attacked unjustly.

  This article claims that President Donald Trump is mocking the homeless and making it trivial. Reading his actual Tweets does nothing of the sort. But when someone else is talking, this person are making claims that he is cutting back on housing, allowing owners to increase rents, etc. Well, where is the source? There is no sources or proposed laws this person points to. What should be mocked are those who claim to be journals and are not!

What Trump did say in his Tweets, to sum it up is, that it’s deplorable of San Francisco to have all this homelessness and that Nancy Pelosi is spending more time on impeachment than dealing with the homeless issue in her own district!

As Christians believers who really know the Bible, there is an answer to this homelessness. This, no one will do, including Donald Trump. To give you a rough outline of what needs to be done is this:

Repent of our sins
Follow God’s laws, including economics

When I say “God’s laws on economics” there are many factors to consider. The major ones are:

  • Get rid of the debt usury system by cancelling ALL debt. Have money issued by the government debt free and based on production.
  • Ship the foreigners back
  • Just have tithing while eliminating other taxes such as: sales tax, income tax, state and local taxes and other disguised taxes
  • Christian teaching in our schools
  • Immediately stop man creating laws
  • Break up monolithic corporations
  • Allow small businesses to flourish

There are other things that a nation can do but the above are the major ones. You will not hear this from other alternative news sites or from most White Nationalists – because they don’t really know the Bible and that Yahweh, God has all the answers for us.

I hope to have other articles like this that deal with current problems but also how to SOLVE them. Nearly every knows what our problems are but few know what to do and fewer still willing to put it in writing. Now, all we need is some brave men and women in power to use their influence to put this into action. When this is done, the homeless will be a thing of the past (except for the every few who just will not work), as Jesus that the poor will always be with us. But, we can certainly reduce the number of poor even in this sinful world.

Posted in alternative news | Tagged | 3 Comments

It Snowed So I Made A Snowman

Posted on December 25, 2019 by revealed4you

It Snowed, So I Made A Snowman…

From The Net

  8:10 – A feminist passed by and asked me why I didn’t make a snow woman.

8:15 – So, I made a snow woman, too.

8:17 – My feminist neighbour complained about the snow woman’s voluptuous chest saying it objectified snow women everywhere.

8:20 – The gay couple living nearby threw a hissy fit and moaned it should have been two snow men instead.

8:22 – The transgender man…woman…person…asked why I didn’t just make one snow person with detachable parts.

8:25 – The vegans at the end of the lane complained about the carrot nose, as veggies are food and not to decorate snow figures with.

8:28 – I am being called a racist because the snow couple is white.

8:31 – The Muslim across the road demands the snow woman wear a burqa.

8:40 – The Police arrive saying someone has been offended.

8:42 – The feminist neighbour complained again that the broomstick of the snow woman needs to be removed because it depicted women in a domestic role.

8:43 – The council equality officer arrived and threatened me with eviction.

8:45 – TV news crew from the ABC station shows up. I am asked if I know the difference between snowmen and snow-women? I reply, “Snowballs” and am now called a sexist.

9:00 – Now I’m on the News as a suspected terrorist, racist, homophobic, sensibility offender, bent on stirring up trouble during difficult weather.

9:10 – I am asked if I have any accomplices. My children are taken by social services.

9:29 – Far left protesters And Muslim ‘immigrants’, offended by everything, are marching down the street demanding that I be beheaded.

Moral? There is no moral to this story. It’s just a view of the world in which we live today…and it is only getting worse and worse.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 2 Comments

Extreme Capitalism

Posted on December 24, 2019 by revealed4you

Extreme Capitalism

Extreme CapitalismTM is a word that I created a number of years ago. Some people now are picking it up, or using similar words like “Vulture Capitalism.” Extreme Capitalism is anyone that squeezes the most money they can from customers and/or creates a false need for their product or service – regardless of the harm or uselessness of such a product or service.

Think of this when you are Christmas shopping.

This article just focuses on one person and his corporation.

It was very gratifying to see Tucker Carlson’s recent attack on the activities of Paul Singer’s vulture fund, Elliot Associates, a group I first profiled four years ago. In many respects, it is truly remarkable that vulture funds like Singer’s escaped major media attention prior to this, especially when one considers how extraordinarily harmful and exploitative they are. Many countries are now in very significant debt to groups like Elliot Associates and, as Tucker’s segment very starkly illustrated, their reach has now extended into the very heart of small-town America. Shining a spotlight on the spread of this virus is definitely welcome. I strongly believe, however, that the problem presented by these cabals of exploitative financiers will only be solved if their true nature is fully discerned. Thus far, the descriptive terminology employed in discussing their activities has revolved only around the scavenging and parasitic nature of their activities. Elliot Associates have therefore been described as a quintessential example of a “vulture fund” practicing “vulture capitalism.” But these funds aren’t run by carrion birds. They are operated almost exclusively by Jews. In the following essay, I want us to examine the largest and most influential “vulture funds,” to assess their leadership, ethos, financial practices, and how they disseminate their dubiously acquired wealth. I want us to set aside colorful metaphors. I want us to strike through the mask.

Direct link, CLICK HERE

Posted in alternative news | Tagged , | Leave a comment

High Priests of “Science”

Posted on December 22, 2019 by revealed4you

Ask Questions to Make Debunkers Think (If That is Possible)

flat earth handoutsWe all know the mass of people who are addicted to the religion of scientism is overwhelming. Those people usually subscribe to all those “science channels” on youtube and worship people like Neil DeGrasse Tyson, Bill Nye (which I think is the absolute worst of them all), Michio Kaku, Richard Dawkins and so on.

People like that (and probably most people anyway) will not listen to any legitimate flat earth scientific proofs. So before you can actually engage them in any kind of debate they are long gone (and probably think you are some kind of a prankster who was attempting to steal their time). This means that even mentioning flat earth will turn them away immediately and they will never question their whole “scientific”world view.

So why not disrupt their science religion and give them a headache by asking simple questions that they have never really thought of and make them at least go….hmm? The key here is to come off really interested in their opinion and make them believe that they might be able to really help you understand their ludicrous ball-earth “science.”

Just hit them with one question at a time and make sure you don’t show your support for the flat earth (because if you do that in any way – conversation probably is over).

Here are some examples:

Begin like this: “Hey ______, I really like your ___work/YouTube science channel/blabla/whatever_____. I have question that I hope you could answer me: ……”

1) ….How is it that there are no tides in lakes, ponds, rivers, etc. (not even in a glass of water) and why is it that the moon’s gravity doesn’t seem to have any effect on the gases in our atmosphere?

Are there some kind of winds that follow the moon’s path over the earth?

2) …Can you please explain me how it is possible to see a blood moon (lunar eclipse) at daytime?

also: lunar eclipse at sunrise

3) …I would like to know how is it that the duration of twilight is shorter in the southern hemisphere and longer in the northern hemisphere?

For example look at the duration of civil twilight:

http://www.timeanddate.com/astronomy/australia/sydney (southern hemisphere)

vs.

http://www.timeanddate.com/astronomy/sweden/stockholm (northern hemisphere)

vs.

http://www.timeanddate.com/astronomy/ecuador/quito (near the equator)

Never could get my head around that. Please someone explain in a simple way so that I understand. Maybe I’m too dumb, but simply turning my toy globe doesn’t help me find the solution. So, please help 😉

4) ….Why does the atmosphere rotate with the earth? I mean the mass below it stays the same no matter of the location, so therefore I just don’t get the “Because of gravity”-answer. In other words, why does the cloud care whether Africa, New Zealand or Antarctica is below it, when there is always the mass of the whole world below it? So why is the atmosphere so “glued to the ground”? How does this work? Could you please explain?

5) ….I noticed that the continents on the globe of google earth (which claims to have a mathematically correct model of the earth) do not match up with the NASA photos of earth from space.

Just one example…

How can Google be so wrong? What kind of mistakes are those guys making? I mean, I know that there are all kind of different projections of earth for 2D-maps where the sizes of the continents are all wrong and so on, but with the globe itself this cannot happen, right? *confused*

6) ….Shining light on a spherical object always creates a hot spot, right? So why do we not see such a hot spot on the moon or on any NASA picture from the earth or the other planets?

7) ….When airplanes fly straight, the earth underneath them curves, right? So to keep a constant altitude, do they actually have to descent all the time? I mean, otherwise they would end up higher and higher and eventually leave the atmosphere just by flying straight, right? How much do they have to descent?

8) ….Where exactly is the barrier between the atmosphere and the vacuum of space? How does it work and why is the vacuum of space not powerful enough to suck the atmosphere from the earth?

Has somebody ever tried to build for example a high cylinder where the inside is under vacuum and there is a valve (as an air-inlet) at the bottom? The goal of course would be to measure the pressure on top vs. on the bottom of the cylinder with different amounts of air put into the cylinder via the inlet at the bottom.

Hopefully this will at least get them to try to think for themselves a little bit.

As I don’t have a YouTube account (and I do not want to have one), I will not contact those YT channels. But I will try to do it via e-mail to some science websites.

So if you like this idea, please join me.

Some more questions:

To continue my approach of hitting all those science experts with questions that will lead them to at least think a little bit for themselves, here are some more questions. I hope you guys will come up with new ones as well.

Here we go….

9) …in my everyday experience I feel that there is a big difference between sunrise and sunset. Sunrise to me looks more bright, golden and energetic, whereas sunset feels more quiet and reddish. So they look and feel completely different, although they should be the same right? (Like a film that you play backwards looks the same.)

So what are the factors that play into this perception? Has it to do with temperature? Is it more a psychological thing (hard to imagine, because if you just look at google images you will see the difference there as well)? What’s the reason exactly?

10) ….as we all know, we cannot see a new moon from the earth. At night that’s totally logical of course, but what about daytime? The moon is between the sun and the earth. You can only see it when it’s directly aligned with the sun during a solar eclipse. However you can often see the complete moon at daytime when it is crescent. You mostly see the illuminated part, but you can also see the rest (faint but still visible). Any picture that tells you it is a depiction of a new moon at daylight always has one side brighter than the other – therefore it can only be a crescent moon not a (full) new moon.

Why isn’t it possible to see a faint (full) new moon at daytime (like holding any object between my eyes and any bright enough light source, I can always make out its shape)?

In other words, shouldn’t the light-scattering of the atmosphere not obscure the (bigger) faint part of a crescent moon like it does with a new moon? By the way, you can also see the faint part of a crescent moon at night time. Can someone please explain?

More questions regarding the global warming hoax:

11) ….as we all know the density of CO2 is higher than that of the normal atmosphere (air). Otherwise CO2 fire extinguishers won’t work and if you throw dry ice into water the “steam” would just rise and not fall over the edge of the glass, right?.

So if the concentration of CO2 in the surface area is about 400 ppm of the atmosphere, then how much is it let’s say in 20 km height?

And if this height is the place where most of the heating up of the atmosphere is happening (global warming – reflection of heat back to earth) and the little amount of CO2 up there (should be way way less than 400 ppm) is so potent to heat up the entire planet as it does, then why don’t we just use CO2 to isolate our homes? For example make double glass windows and fill them with pure 100% CO2. Shouldn’t that have a super strong effect in reflecting the heat back into your home? Am I missing something or shouldn’t this work just like it does in the upper atmosphere? ?????

12)…I have learned that heat always flows from hot to cold, never the opposite way. Can somebody please explain why this seems to be different in all those explanations for global warming? How can the heat be reflected at 20 km height where the temperature is much colder than on the relatively hot surface of earth? If it is just because of the reflection of infra-red radiation, then why is the layer of CO2 in the atmosphere not reflecting all the incoming infra-red radiation from the sun back to into space, so it doesn’t get to earth in the first place? In other words, shouldn’t CO2 have a cooling effect instead of heating? Or at least shouldn’t the reflected IR rays from the earth and the sun just cancel each other out?

 

Posted in Flat Earth Questions | Tagged | Leave a comment

UFO Believer and Flat Earth Debate

Posted on December 20, 2019 by revealed4you

Stanton Friedman and Mark Sargent

Many of you know that Stanton Friedman is one of the biggest advocates of UFO, Ets and life on other planets. All people who believe in UFOs also believe in a heliocentric universe (globes travelling through space). UFO believers either don’t believe in a flat earth or they never heard the facts about the flat earth.

By the way, Mark Sargent gave some misleading information. For example, he allowed the plausibility of a dome that stretches way beyond the earth – ‘like putting a large bowel over a 50 cent piece’ he said. Sargent also said of the possibility that Aliens are just not allowing us out. It is God that is not allowing us outside the dome.

People who know about Sargent, like Eric Dubay, claims he’s a shill. But putting that aside this video should be interesting.

Back to Friedman, once they accept it they have no choice but not to believe in other planets and life on some of them. What will Stanton Friedman believe in the end? Will he continue to live in a fary tail or will he accept the truth? Friedman has a lot at stake for he made a name for himself as a big advocate of UFOs; he has written many books on the subject in which he derives his income from. Will he give this all up and become a flat earth believer or will he stay a UFO believer with billions of planets travelling through space. Listen and find out.

Posted in aliens, UFO and Aliens | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Typical Objections The Flat Earth

Posted on December 19, 2019 by revealed4you

Here are some objections to a flat earth. This was actually sent by a reader. I’ll do my best to answer them. You’ll probably find more detailed objections in many of the flat earth videos that are posted on the internet and what are on Christian Flat Earth Ministry blog site right here. So, here goes…

Q: If the world is flat, why do objects appear over the horizon?

Objects ‘appear’ over the horizon because they come into view, not because they came over the curve. It’s the law of perspective – your eyes can only see so far.

Q: Do you really believe every space mission ever was just a conspiracy?

The quick answer is, ‘Yes.’ People, in general believe that someone lied when the lie is small. That’s because they make small lies themselves. But they believe a big lie because they don’t think that anyone would lie on such a grand scale only because they would never do it. Thus, it’s hard for people to believe that a whole space agency (NASA), that the educational system and that governments would lie. People typically think, ‘They wouldn’t lie to us.’ Thus, they fall for the big lie.

By the way, do a YouTube search on: fake moon landing

Q: What would space agencies and increasingly private space projects have to gain by faking the entire thing?

There are several reasons for this, they include: to make money from us, to have us believe that we evolved from apes and that man has ‘all the answers.’

NASA gets billions of dollars per year. Some of this is spent to ‘put on a show’ but the majority of it goes in their pockets. Most people can’t accept that. I understand people doubting this when the lie is so monstrous. Surely, the average person would think that they would be found out. When you have powerful people and you use some of that money to ‘grease the hands’ of others – people keep their mouths shut. In government, employees have to sign ‘non-disclosures’ in order for them to keep their mouths shut.

But one thing you should keep in mind is, that your flat earth research should be based on facts of physics. Don’t base the flat earth on ‘How can so many people be on the “take.”  Base this on facts, such as, ‘Water can not stay on a ball and that includes the globe earth.’ Once you examine that, then what the rest the government tells us MUST be a lie.

It would be a vast waste of money and human resources to fake building the International Space Station.

Not when the money comes from the taxpayers.

The Soviet Union was deeply humiliated after being beaten in the race to the Moon. It would have been easy to admit that there had been a conspiracy and spacecraft did not go around the Earth.

The Soviet Union knew about the true nature of the earth; they had their fake orbiting around the earth. So, they, too, kept their mouths shut. Remember, Russia was, at that time, was an Anti-Christ communist system and the central part of their philosophy is ‘that there is no God, that Christ did not exist and the Bible is not true.’ They were a big supporter of what Charles Darwin wrote – that we evolved from lower forms of life. If the facts of the flat earth were told; that there is a dome over us and that above this dome is Heaven itself, it will throw out the whole evolution lie in one fatal blow. This, they can’t have, so Soviets were more than willing to go along with it. To make all this heliocentric universe look real they have to make it look like there are space missions, International Space Station, trips to Mars, new planets found, ad nausea.

The ‘outer space’ we are presented with is nothing more than computer generated images (CGI). For example, to make a ‘space station’ could cost $50,000, but this is nothing with the billions dollars they receive for funding every year. A very nice profit indeed!

Posted in Flat Earth Questions | Tagged | Leave a comment