Phoney Math to Rule Out a Non-Moving Earth
(Taken from TSE Pt 2-History Big Bang pp. 7, 8 of 13: … Furthermore: there was a meeting of Communist Scientists in London in 1931 which was when Gamow was at Cambridge–and the year he was called back to be Master of Research at Leningrad U. (There are three pages of rare quotations that relate to that London conference on the furtherance of Communist ideology through “science” given at that link above.) The following samples from those pages bear heavily on this entire web page effort… Note these statements from Communist (i.e., atheist) “scientists” at that London Conference:
“Modern physics rejects absolute inertia.” 28 [“Why?! Because modern [i.e., atheist Communist] physics must insure for all times that the Earth moves. All Communists are atheists who must believe in evolution. The Bible’s stationary Earth teaching must forever be forbidden by “physics”!]
“The teaching of the self-movement of matter received its full development in the dialectical materialism of Marx, Engles, and Lenin.”29 [Does that sound like “physical science” to you?]
[Engles said]: “…one of the BASIC THESES of dialectical materialism [communism] is the inseparability of movement from matter.”30 [“Basic is pretty strong, wouldn’t you say? This reminds one of Marx’s exultation over the advent of Darwin’s book: “You have given me the ‘Basis’ for my system!”
“The mathematisation of physics…is continually growing and physics is becoming more and more dependent upon the fate of mathematics.”31 And that was over 75 years ago!
“This special mathematics–the tensor analysis, the matrix calculus, the theory of characteristic numbers–has for the greater part been created by the physicists themselves, for ordinary mathematics is unable to satisfy the requirements of present day physics”32 [Who says “No inertia allowed”? Physicists.]
“For mathematics there is only one way out: conscious, planned reconstruction on the basis of materialist [no God] dialectics.”33 [Step right up and witness the Politically Correct Science that has made the Earth move with a clever mathematical model when all known phenomena is readily explained by a stationary Earth Model!]
“To overcome the crisis in present-day mathematics, to reconstruct it along socialist lines, patient and persistent work is necessary… Preceding from Leninist theory…we [scientists] in the Soviet Union shall reconstruct the mathematical sciences.”34 [They succeeded in “reconstructing” the mathematical sciences.. This Phony “New Math” was then implanted in Science Departments in the world’s Universities where it became an indispensable weapon in an “all or nothing” spiritual warfare. This pivotal battle has been between the Pharisee’s “creation scenario” of 15 billion years of evolutionism and the Christian’s Biblical “creation scenario” which required no evolution whatsoever. The credibility of both religions stands or falls on the credibility its foundational “creation scenario” of which the moving or non-moving Earth is the keystone.
bit of a pity that all their claims had exactly nothing to do with real, experimental science which must closely follow “the scientific method”
☞ of interest….
( “death by mathematics” ….. Miles Mathis )
or…. the pre-meditated murder of Physics….
✯ a “sample” ✯
Contrary to what we are told, contemporary physics is not booming
It is not very near to omniscience, it is not the crown jewel of anything
In fact, it is near death ☠
It has been damaged by any number of things, only a few of which I have mentioned by name here
But the prime murderer has been abstract mathematics
Physics has succumbed to a suffocation
It is the victim of a strangulation
It is in a not-so-shallow grave and piled on top of it like dirt are a thousand fields and operators and variables and names and spaces and terms and eigenvalues and dimensions
and criteria and functions and coordinates and conjugates and bases and bjective maps and auto-morphism groups and abelian gauge fields and Dirac spinors and Feynman diagrams and so on ad nauseum
The only way the grave could be any deeper and darker, in fact, is if we allowed Deconstruction to dump its trans-finite dictionary of onanic terms on top of this one