Is Human Philosophy to Supersede Divine Revelation?

False preacher Benny Hinn.

False preacher Benny Hinn.

Is the prescriptive applause of centuries to render us insensible to the inquiry whether God or man is to be trusted? If the earth be indeed a globe, then the whole history of the flood is palpably imperfect and untrue. Unless the earth were a plane, Moses invented all the particulars connected with the event, from the beginning to the end. “Forty days and forty nights” rain could not have half flooded as many acres; and when, somehow or other, the waters did “cover the earth” and “the tops of the highest hills,” they could not possibly have dispersed again by any means which the most scientific skill could account for or devise. “Oh, the sun and the wind dried it.” Why, then, has not “the sun and the wind” dried up the seas during the space of nearly 6000 years? No; these waters have not diminished by one single hogshead since the day the flood was at its height! The rain of the “forty days and forty nights” merely helped by its weight to submerge the plane of the earth below the level of “the great deep;” and the flood therefore consisted of the irruption of the salt water from the ocean, and not, as is supposed, of the fresh water from the sky. The sea-sand, the sea-shells, and shingle which are found hundreds of miles inland prove this. Then, at the end of so many days, “God made a strong wind to pass over the earth,…and the waters returned” – mark the expression “returned” – “from off the earth continually.” They could not have “returned” from off a globe, unless we could see the waters stacked up into mountains, with the dry earth lying at their base. When the weight of the water was displaced by the hight wind, the earth rose again like a submerged vessel, and its surface was drained of its moisture like the decks of a ship heaved up from beneath.

Posted in False Preachers, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Why Is There False Prophets?

Why do people allow false prophets to rule the land?

false-preachers-1  You may ask how is it that false teaching is so wide spread? Why is it when many people are told the truth they don’t want to hear it. While I’m not saying is, one answer for everything, but there is one reason that we are told from the Bible why people like it the way things are today.

All of this, by the way applies to people who don’t want to hear about the flat earth and a host of other conspiracies.

Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine. (2Ti 4:2)

For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; (2Ti 4:3)

And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. (2Ti 4:4)

Mega church were false preaching is often heard.

Mega church were false preaching is often heard.

  The answer is, because the people like it so; they want fables. This applies to all Christian doctrines but also to secular topics, too, including the flat earth. Is not the spinning earth doing all kinds of gyrations at fantastic speeds a fable? And people like it because it “tickles their ears,” or, as the Bible says, “itching ears.”

That this is a rebellious people, lying children, children that will not hear the law of the LORD: (Isa 30:9)

God’s people are really rebellious – they have broken every moral laws, every biblical law you can think of. How true that preachers will not hear the law of Yahweh; you even find this among Patriots who think they can be true Patriots and not be a Christian.

Which say to the seers, See not; and to the prophets, Prophesy not unto us right things, speak unto us smooth things, prophesy deceits: (Isa 30:10)

People don’t want to hear the truth in churches, they want to hear things that are “smooth.” I take this to be things that doesn’t require them to do anything – just sit back and let God do everything. After all, these pious Christians say, “We will be whisked away to Heaven before all this trouble starts.” Also, they say in their collective smugness, “We must get along with everyone – even the non-Christian – so speak to us in smooth ways.”

The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and my people love to have it so: and what will ye do in the end thereof? (Jer 5:31)

The people “love to have it so!”

And who do we learn much of this from?

Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth. (Tit 1:14)

Posted in False Preachers | Tagged | Leave a comment

Beware of False Prophets

Why Are There False Prophets?

Joel Osteen (r)

Joel Osteen (r)

  We all know that there are false prophets in this day and age. Regarding Christianity it has run rappet. There are mnay of them who are real obvious such as: Benny Hinn, Joel Osteen and Ken Kopeland. You don’t have to know your Bible well to detect they are false prophets. But how do you know about the preacher down the street – the church you might want to attend? Do you have to be a Bible scholar to determine if they are speaking the truth? What if you are new to the Bible, how do you detect a false preacher?

The answer is really simple. All you do is ask a question that is asked in the Bible AND where an answer is given. The topic to start with is with salvation. Since this is the bases of Christianity it would be good to start here. In this article, we will just focus on this question.

But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. (2Pe 2:1)

Why should we test the false prophets? Because they are out there; they were out there since recorded history and they are here today.

Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. (1Jn 4:1)

What you should do first is, to prepare what you are going to ask first, and to know the biblical answer. Then ask in such a way that it’s not obvious to the preacher (or individual) you are asking. Let’s start…

First, you don’t know if you are being lied to unless you test the preachers or fellow Christian. You can test someone without knowing much about the Bible yourself (though you should be studying it). Then, after you get your answer, compare that to what the Bible itself says. Does it match up? Does the preacher know what he is talking about? Now, this is especially important to the Babes in Christ and if you are one of them, then please read on…

Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ. (Act 2:36)

Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do? (Act 2:37)

Question: What shall we do in order to be saved?

If your preacher can’t get this one right, he is not even saved; he has no authority to be speaking in the church!

Likely preacher answer: “All you have to do is ask for Jesus Christ in your heart.”

Bible answer:

Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. (Act 2:38)

Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls. (Act 2:41)

You’ve got to believe, repent and be baptised.

Nearly all preacher will leave out the repent and baptised part.

Here is another verse, another verification to this same question:

And brought them out, and said, Sirs, what must I do to be saved? (Act 16:30)

And he took them the same hour of the night, and washed their stripes; and was baptized, he and all his, straightway. (Act 16:33)

Osteen's church in Lakewood, Texas

Osteen’s church in Lakewood, Texas

Here is another passage with Paul’s conversion:

And it came to pass, that, as I made my journey, and was come nigh unto Damascus about noon, suddenly there shone from heaven a great light round about me. (Act 22:6)

And I said, What shall I do, Lord? And the Lord said unto me, Arise, and go into Damascus; and there it shall be told thee of all things which are appointed for thee to do. (Act 22:10)

Again, you’ve read about “What shall I do?” Now, most preachers will tell you that Paul was saved on the road to Damascus, but we read on:

And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord. (Act 22:16)

Paul had to be baptized – like we all do!

Now, a word about “baptized.” This is where the clergy get it wrong again. Baptized is not a sprinkling on the head with a little water; it’s not a dry cleaning. It’s submersion. This is what the original Greek means – check it out for yourself. This is VERY IMPORTANT.

How does your preacher rate?

More on baptism

And as they went on their way, they came unto a certain water: and the eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized? (Act 8:36)

Bible Question:

What prevents me from being saved?

Likely preacher answer:

You can do it any time.

What’s important is being saved.

This is just an outward sign of an inward belief.

You can do this the first Sunday of the month.

Oh, it’s not important.

Bible answer:

And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. (Act 8:37)

And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him. (Act 8:38)

No where in the Bible do you read of “an outward sign of an inner belief.” This might sound like it’s from the Bible but it’s not.

There is nothing in the Bible that would indicate that baptism is just a sprinkling or pouring of water on the head. There are a few churches who recognises that this is of utmost importance. Have you ever notice up from behind the alter there is wooden covering of a bathtub? You’ll find this in some of the Baptist churches. (Ever wonder why there is a denomination called Baptists?)

Many years ago, when I discovered the importance of proper baptism, I got baptised, by full immersion, with other Christians. You should think of this.

Bible question:

Is the Kingdom being restored?

Acts 1:6 When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?

Likely preacher answer:

The kingdom isn’t going to be restored. The covenant isn’t made with us. It’s spiritual Israel not physical Israel.

Bible answer:

Yes, it will be restored, but here is what Christ said:

And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power. (Act 1:7)

And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? (Mat 13:10)

He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given. (Mat 13:11)

Here we read that the people knew of a physical restoration of the Kingdom and that it would be them, as they knew they were of the house of Israel.

The former treatise have I made, O Theophilus, of all that Jesus began both to do and teach, (Act 1:1)

Until the day in which he was taken up, after that he through the Holy Ghost had given commandments unto the apostles whom he had chosen: (Act 1:2)

To whom also he shewed himself alive after his passion by many infallible proofs, being seen of them forty days, and speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God: (Act 1:3)

Acts 1.1-3 This was speaking of the things that concern the kingdom of God. They knew who the kingdom pertained to!

Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof. (Mat 21:43)

But rather seek ye the kingdom of God; and all these things shall be added unto you. (Luk 12:31)

Fear not, little flock; for it is your Father’s good pleasure to give you the kingdom. (Luk 12:32)

What does “flock” refer to? To sheep. There is only one people of all the people mentioned in the Bible who are called or referred to sheep and that is the house of Israel, sometimes referred to Jacob or Juda (all part of the tribes of Israel).

And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end. (Luk 1:33)

He hath holpen his servant Israel, in remembrance of his mercy; (Luk 1:54)

As he spake to our fathers, to Abraham, and to his seed for ever. (Luk 1:55)

Luke 1.26-27, 30-33

he will reign over the house of Jacob forever. Kingdom will have no end.

How is your preacher scoring so far?

Bible question:

Should we obey the government?

Likely preacher answer:

We must obey the government. We must all government authority. All government is set up by God.

Bible answer:

But Peter and John answered and said unto them, Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye. (Act 4:19)

This is a statement of fact as well as a question.

Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men. (Act 5:29)

Often a preacher will quote Romans chapter 13 – the passage that, they claim, says we should obey government. Well, it does say we should obey government IF IT’S GODLY. But if it’s not, we should not obey it.

Think of times past when the Angel of God freed the Apostles from prison; you can call that a “jail break.” and it did not happen once but twice! Don’t you think that was against the law to break out of jail? What do you think would happen if Paul said, “No thanks, well stay right here. Don’t you realize that we would be breaking the law if we escape? Don’t you realise Angel, that we would be fugitives?”

Well, thank God that they DID break out of jail.

How did your preacher do? “Not well!” It doesn’t surprise me as the world if filled with false preachers.

Posted in False Preachers | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Eric Dubay Exposed

Flat Earther Eric Dubay Exposed

Today I came across a video that is on Eric Dubay’s YouTube site that is titled: Jesus Never Existed. This is actually made by someone else which Eric thought was good. This shows his true colors. Of course we knew he was not a Christian but to actually deny that Christ existed shows the true colors of Dubay.

Then, a couple of minutes later I came across another video that shows Eric Dubay’s connection with the ruling elite in Taiwan. This is really revealing and exposes him.

Now, you may wonder, as I did, why does he say he’s a truth seeker and fighting the NWO order when his future father-n-law is part of it? Well, as the Jew Lenin said many years ago, in order to control the opposition you be it.

I have to admit that I did learn about the flat earth from Eric Dubay’s videos and they were well done. And he did put out a lot of material on the flat earth and even written a book on the subject (though half of it was a copy from an old flat earth book).

For someone who claims to seek the truth, for someone who knows what the enemy has been doing and knowing about conspiracies in general, be believes the lie that Jesus Christ never existed! This is what the New World Order wants everyone to believe. Now, for Dubay who says he is fighting the NWO this is a big lie.

I can only guess why he put out all this flat earth information and that is, for the NWO to collect information as to who supports it. It’s like the old tactic of giving the people some truth but in the most important areas, give them lies. The truth area is telling people that the earth is flat and stationary but the lie area is telling people that Christ never existed or, that He is not God in the flesh who came to save us from our sins.

There is a link to the “Christ Never Existed” video (so you can verify that Dubay did put this up). Click Here. But don’t waste your time watching it. And, there is the embedded video (below) of Eric Dubay Exposed that you might want to see. It’s about 14 minutes long.

This gives me all the more drive to bring Bible truth along with the flat earth at: ChristianFlatEarthMinistry.org And this Bible truth includes topics that the mainline churches do not carry – because it’s not “politically correct.”

Again, I thank you for taking time and following this website.

Posted in False Preachers | Tagged | 5 Comments

The Popularity of Error

The Unpopularity of Truth

From Zetetic Astronomy

by “Parallax”

1869

An extract

(Spelling and grammar as in the original.)

Whether this applies to social, mechanical, or divine science, the result is for ever the same. Pound man rebels against whatever would dispel or expose his own ignorance and folly; and, almost without a single exception, those who have braved the bigotry and prejudices of the world have met with nothing but reproach and resistance instead of the advice and approval they deserved.

What are called the Newtonian and Copernican theories respecting the rotundity and revolution of the world, are quite as much at variance with the inspired records as is an statement ever made by a Colenso or any of the Essayists and Reviewers. However trivial or unimportant the subject may appear in itself, yet the fact of its being unsupported by and directly contrary to the Word of God ought to render it of unspeakable interest to all who wisely consider that the minutest departure from the spirit of what Moses and the prophets have written, to be as prejudicial to the whole scheme of revelation as if it referred to an article of faith. If Moses wrote doubtingly or uncertainly about one single point in the history of creation, no one can justly blame an avowed sceptic for throwing discredit on the whole. I would, therefore, call attention to the following facts: First and foremost, the word “world” is used rather over 260 times in the Bible; the word “round” is never once applied to it. Not a single expression is used, from Genesis to Revelation, suggestive of the idea that the earth is other than a stationary plane; and no hint is to be gathered by the most prejudiced advocate of the Newtonian theory as to its rotundity and revolution. Expressions are constantly used which would be downright nonsense if the earth were a revolving globe.

These facts alone ought to render any further arguments superfluous. But, such is the tendency to throw discredit on the language of inspiration, that an appeal to scientific research and to the unanswerable logic of facts seems to be imperative. Now, what do we see? First, that not a single experiment has ever been made in support of the Newtonian theory but what would equally, if not more forcibly, apply to its opponents. The Newtonian argues that, looking across the ocean, the water appears convex; when asked to look to the right and left, he is obliged to confess that it is horizontal, though the distance surveyed be in both cases the same. That the doctrine of the earth’s rotundity cannot be mixed up with the practical operations of the civil engineer and surveyor has been peremptorily decided by a Parliamentary enactment, that “to prevent waste of time and money, which has frequently attended the operations of those who made their calculations according to the prevailing theory of the convexity of the earth’s surface, every survey in this or any other country should be carried out according to the horizontal datum, as no other method has proved satisfactory, or can be adopted without involving an unnecessary destruction of property, and more or less complete failure of the work in progress.” [No. 44, Standing Orders of the House of Commons.] Can anything be more conclusive?

The next experiment is even more decisive still. Take an artificial globe or wheel of any dimensions possible; there will be only one single spot where a level can be obtained, and that under the condition of absolute and complete repose. Any inclination, backwards or forwards, would instantly disturb the level which had been obtained at its extreme apex or highest point. But just reduce this experiment to practice, and take the theodolite to any part of the habitable “globe” as it is called, and ten thousand levels can be made wherever a yard of still water can be found, at any point of the compass, by day or by night. The absolute and undeniable fact that all waters upon the face of the earth are horizontal to each other; is a positive proof that the earth cannot be a sphere, and cannot revolve on an axis.

Let me proceed to ask a few practical questions:

Has any navigator ever asserted that he has sailed round or seen anything he could call the “South Pole?”

Has anyone ever crossed the “South Pole?”

Has anyone ever crossed the North Pole?

Why is the smallest earthquake so perceptible, while we cannot feel the violent revolutions of the earth, going at the rate of over 1100 miles per hours at the Equator, and more than 700 feet per second in England?

Have any of the navigators who have declared that they have “sailed round the globe” ever been bottom upwards, the sky where the water ought to be; or had they any other proofs that when they were midway, their decks were not as level as when they left the English harbours?

If these wonderful navigators had never seen a globe with a map of the earth and sea on it, would they ever have ventured to declare that they had “sailed round the world” perpendicularly?

When a little child runs “round” the loo table in the drawing room, is anyone insane enough to believe that he went across the top and down underneath the legs of pedestal and up again to complete the circle?

Would not the easiest and least expensive method of getting to any distant place be to ascend in a balloon on a very still day, and remain suspended till the revolution of the earth brought the round the distant land to which they were bound, when they could descend, and save at least 95 per cent of their passage money and all the risks of a sea voyage?

But I have not the patience to “answer fools according to their folly,” or I might proceed to expose the absurdity of every theory which has been devised to bolster up this preposterous system of Sir Isaac Newton and his predecessor, Copernicus, endorsed and accepted by men wise in their own conceits, but sheer infidels when brought to the test of Scripture. The Word of the living God, the Creator of Heaven and Earth, does not give the slightest shadow of authority in support of such a notion. Not a verse, or a line, or a syllable can be produced calculated to convey such an impression, but uniformly the reverse; for, however wicked mandkind were said to be, it was never contemplated that their folly and ignorance would require instruction on a subject which could hardly admit of misconstruction or mistake.

Copernicus himself, the author and originator of this fanciful and purely fictitious theory, had the honesty thus to speak of his own so-called discovery; (and for this and for the greater part of what follows, I am indebted to a most interesting and instructive little book, entitled “Zetetic Astronomy,” by Parallax; Simpkin and Marhsall, London). “Copernicus admitted,” the author remarks, “It is not necessary that hypotheses should be true, or even probable; neither let anyone, as far as hypotheses are concerned, expect anything certain from astronomy; since that science an afford nothing of the kind; lest, in case he should adopt for truth things feigned for another purpose, he should leave this study more foolish then he came into it… The theory of the terrestrial motion was nothing but theory, valuable only so far as it explained phenomena, and not considered with reference to absolute truth or faleshood.”

Posted in flat earth discussion, Old flat earth news | Tagged | Leave a comment

No “Gravity” In Space Lie

“Gravity” Between The Earth and the Moon

space-station-gravityauthor-rd  We often see astro-nots performing in their “International Space Station” doing all kinds of gyrations for viewers. They show how things float in space and catching food in their mouths. These stunts are for us to believe that there is no gravity in space. Of course, we know that there is no such thing as gravity period, but just that objects fall; this is another topic. Anyhow, here is something I thought about that I haven’t read in other flat earth literature or seen on flat earth videos and that is: exactly where does “gravity” stop and weightlessness start?

We are told that when in space there is no gravity but we are never told and never shown where this so-called “gravity” stops and where its effect is zero.

I have not seen from NASA or other space agencies of astro-nots going up in space and some point on the way up they show that there is no gravity. This can be shown very easily – IF what we are told is the truth – by showing how much longer it takes for an object to drop to the floor. Why aren’t we shown this? We all know the answer but following along NASA’s line of of “no gravity in space,” let’s continue.

We read in Wikipedia:

The ISS maintains an orbit with an altitude of between 330 and 435 km (205 and 270 mi) by means of reboost manoeuvres using the engines of the Zvezda module or visiting spacecraft. It completes 15.54 orbits per day.

That means that somewhere between the earth and 205 miles up there is no gravity. OK but where does gravity lose its force? In other words, at what altitude does an object takes longer to fall? This should be able to be shown on a video. I haven’t seen any. Or, are we to believe that at a certain altitude up all of a sudden there is no gravity?

Now, even if NASA comes up with a video and information that goes with it, it’ll be fake. Even IF we are told something, then they have to answer another question, which is: At what point in travel to the moon that all of a sudden gravity kicks in again? For example, we are told that the moon has 1/6th the pull of earth. OK, at what altitude did our astronauts feel this? We were never told this.

Tangle Web of Lie

There is a tangle web of lies NASA and others are faced with once one lie is told. Some other questions are:

If the moon is suppose to pull the oceans of the world, and the moon does this from a distance of 237,000 miles, then how can astronauts not be effected by this pull? How can there be no gravity with this range? If the moon pulls on the oceans, this is a massive amount! So, how can there be a place within this force field where there is no gravity?

IF what we are told that heavenly bodies have an attractive force on the smaller bodies how is it that the moon, which is much smaller than the earth, pull trillions of tons of water? Then, once it has this pull, why does it release it?

If the oceans are pulled away from the land why does the ISS, and all satellites for that matter, be pulled further up in space? Why isn’t the ISS, for example, be pulled to the surface of the moon? Hey, we’d get a free ride there. But on the other hand, with such a pull, how in the world can a little rocket leave the surface and fly back to earth?

In short, this is another reason that tells us that “gravity” does not exist, and satellites don’t exist either.

Posted in Gravity | Tagged | 4 Comments

Little Known Secrets of the Flat Earth

Could the Earth Also Create It’s Own Metals?

oil-well-off-shore2author-rd  I happened to be listening to an audio tape the other day that had nothing to do with the flat earth. In the beginning of this tape the speaker told about a news article that appeared on the front page of the Phoenix Gazette. This audio was made in 1982 and the speaker said the article was in a Saturday edition of the newspaper. No date was given.

The article said that divers in a submarine discovered 6,000 feet below the surface of the ocean, off the coast of California, what looked like chimneys rising 100 feet up with of a streams of oil coming out. They described it as seeing oil in the making; that there were different grades of oil. They also identified, upon examination, that this column was pushing up zinc, copper and iron oxide. The observers described it as earth’s oil fracking plant; that the earth actually creates its own oil. Now, this we have learned in recent years but to read this back in the 1980s shows that this information has been kept under wraps.

The interesting thing is, that could earth create its own minerals? Could earth create at least some of its own minerals? Or, was this minerals already deep underground? Since oil is created could minerals also be created? According to this old article it sounds like it. Think of the magnificence of God’s creation!

In recent years there have been talk on alternative news sites that the earth create its own oil. In other words, oil does NOT come from decaying plant and animal matter. During the time of the Soviet Union they had notices that some of their old oil wells that had gone dry filled up with oil again years later. Americans then discovered this same process but this information has been kept secret. The reason being is, to make it look like oil is in limited supply and thus keep the price of oil high.

Could the earth also be creating its own minerals – given a certain amount of time, pressure and heat to do so? Don’t expect to hear the truth from mainline media.

Now and then the truth comes out in the media – even if it’s by accident. Could this news article that appeared 34 years ago be one of them? Could the media been told not to report any more on such a topic?

Yahweh God, in His great wisdom, not only created the earth and all life therein but had planned from the beginning what would be need thousands of years in the future? We are told in the Bible, for example, about Job; that God knew him from the foundations of the earth. Since God knows one person and how he’ll be, He also knows about each and everyone one of us. God also knows what man will and will not do and plans things accordingly. In other words, God is not caught by surprised when some evil man does something and thereby messes up His plans. This is contrary to the false teachings that we have in churches today. If you talk to the average Christian they will tell you that God had Plan A, then when that didn’t work He had Plan B. An example would be that God chose the Jews but because they didn’t accept Christ as their Saviour, He had to go to Plan B and accept the Gentiles. (That is another whole story.) The point I want to make is that God had thought EVERYTHING out to the final conclusion.

You might want to do your own research on abiotic oil. Here are a couple of links to get you started:

Discovery backs theory oil not ‘fossil fuel’

http://www.rense.com/general58/biot.htm

http://www.rense.com/general58/abioticoilscience.htm

I believe that God had created the earth and all the chemicals, metals and other materials that man needs. And that if we follow His Laws, Statues and Judgement, we will not be short of anything!Contrary to what the “fear mongers” would have you believe that we will run short of this, run short of that, etc. No, God has provided EVERYTHING for us in the right measure.

In conclusion, this is another secret of the flat earth, namely, that the earth produces its own oil and at least some of its own minerals. What a wonderful God we serve!

Hidden Gold

gold-mine  Talking about the earth producing its own oil and possibly its own minerals, the fact is that we do have more minerals in the ground than what is reported. My brother-in-law used to work in the South African mines many years ago digging for gold. There were mostly Black workers but he is White and was a good worker. He told me that on three occasions in his life he came across a vain of gold that was huge. He told his boss and the company was about ready to celebrate but the word came down from the very top of the company to remain silent and close up the shaft they dug! Get that: keep silent and close up the shaft.

gold-vain  Why was this? To keep the price of gold high! The exact location was market and the company kept a record of it, of course. So, when more gold is need, it’ll be there.

Hidden Diamonds

About the diamonds, I heard this from some reporter on the internet where she was shown by a rich Jewish owner of a diamond mine some diamonds. She was asked if she would like to see more diamonds, and she said yes. (What woman doesn’t want to see more diamonds 🙂 Anyhow, it wasn’t just a couple of rings or a small tray but crates of diamonds stored in a warehouse! Now, you can believe it or not. But knowing how the billionaires think it does not surprise me that they want to keep this hidden in order to keep the price high. You may ask why did this guy show this to the reporter in the first place? My guess is, that some people just have to tell someone else about a big secret, to brag a bit. But about him being afraid that this news would get out, he knows that would not be a problem. First off, the media is controlled. And IF the story gets out they can say it was not true and then not mention another word of it from then on. They also know that people have a short memory and will forget about it, too.

In short, this great flat earth of ours has enough treasure for all of us, it’s just that we are not told about it.

Save

Save

Save

Posted in Bible and science, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Hologram: To Make Your Reality Seem Real

Hologram and the Earth

 

Here is another technology technique used to create a false reality of earth. Just a few minutes ago I was watching a video on YouTube when I came across this. As you know, many news outlets use the spinning globe for their “world news.” But the one I saw in this video there is a bit of added technology that has been added – the use of a hologram for the clouds!

When you watch this video check in about 3:50 and you’ll see what I mean. This gives the illusion that the video is real; the clouds look 3-D and floating above the earth. The “clouds,” of course, do not change shape!

It’s amazing the amount of work that is done to continue to create a false reality for people.

By the way, you might like the video as it’s about more lies of the Clintons.

Posted in General Flat Earth Topics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Impossible To Send Signals Into Space



Sending Radio Signals Into Space Exposed

satellite-orionauthor-rd  There are several reasons why it’s impossible to send and receive signals to satellites. Exposing sending and receiving radio signals into space. One is the dome or firmament. Another reason is that the distance is too far to send without a relay tower (like the kind we have all over the country.) But to start on this topic you’d have a much harder time to convince someone who is not a flat earth believer. For example, you’ll have to prove that there is a firmament and for people that are not Christian, for people who don’t believe in the Bible, it’ll be a hard thing to do. But there is another area I would like to talk on, that I hope globe earth believers will understand better. But first, I have to talk on another subject and that is a drone.

We all know that the America government uses drones in places like Pakistan, Iraq and Syria. The soldier that is operating the drone could be in Europe or as far away as America. Let’s say that a drone is being used is against an ISIS military truck and the soldier is in Germany. Through the camera the soldier gets video stream of the truck. He then determine it is a military truck from ISIS. So, he steers the drone in position – while looking at his computer monitor. The cross-hair is lined up and he pushes a button that sends a missile which destroys the truck. All well and good.

We all know how this happens and that is, by a radio signal that is sent and received. How was the soldier specifically able to do it? He got REAL TIME video feed and was able to send out REAL TIME signals to the drone. In other words, as soon as the target was lined up he immediately pressed the button which, in turn, immediately fired the missile – thus, the target was hit.

With the recent satellite named “Rosetta” which sent a probe on an asteroid recently, we were told that this took place 3.7 billion miles away. We were told by a senior scientist from the European Space Agency that a probe was launched from the satellite and landed on this asteroid.

Before I go further let’s look at what else we were all told since we were in grade school. We were told that the sun is 93 million miles away and it takes light 8 minutes to reach earth. We were also told that light travels at about the same speed as radio signals. OK, let’s assume all of this is true. We are also told how long it takes a picture or some other signal from any given satellite to reach us – depending on how far away. So, let’s do some math.

Now, check me on my calculations; I might be a little off, but it will not effect what I want to illustrate. Back to the “Rosetta” satellite. This asteroid is 3.7 billions miles away. Light travels at 186,000/per second which is the same for radio signals. Therefore, it will take 19,8924 seconds to travel 3.7 billion miles, which equls 3,315 minutes, which equals 55 hours, which equals 2.3 days.

We were also told that this satellite was flying around an asteroid which was also revolving – looking for a relatively flat place for the probe to land. On top of this we were told that the probe “bounced off” the asteroid twice before it as able to land safely (yea, sure). In other words, signals had to be sent back and forth to earth, which was 3.7 billion miles away! For one signal to be sent to earth and a command to be sent back it would take 110 hours! Think in terms of the signal being sent out from the satellite on Monday and receiving a signal back Thursday evening. Tell me, how in the H can you direct anything with such a huge time lag in between? In other words, there was NO REAL TIME! Yet people at the European Space Agency had to make real time decisions.

You simply can’t give commands to anything by radio signals when there is a time delay and expect to hit your target. Even if the satellite was where Mars is, the time delay of even a few minutes would be too great for it to make any manoeuvres you want it to. If everything was stationary – no moving satellite, no moving asteroid, then, maybe you can hit your target.

When a soldier is directing a drone to hit a target or to fly around buildings, it can do so because the distance is so short that it’s real time. Signals traveling at 186,282 miles per hour from Iraq to the United States you still have “live action,” as we are only talking about a fraction of a second. Imagine if a soldier had to wait even one minute; do you think that the truck, which is traveling, would be able to be hit? (Aside from a heat-seeking missile, of course.) No, as it would take a minute to receive the signal and a minute to send the command, that would be two minutes for the truck to move. Sending a receiving signals in an atmosphere AND with a short distance can be done. But when we are talking about millions of miles or billions of miles of space, it can’t be done.

Hopefully, for all the globe earth believers, who are told this would understand that it’s impossible for signals to be sent and receive in space, and even more ludicrous for delicate manoeuvres to be made when it takes 55 hours to send and 55 hours to receive a signal.

Posted in NASA Space Programs | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Questions on the Universe

Questions on the Universe

Like my Post titled: Questions on Satellites, here is one on the cosmos. The purpose of these articles is to stimulate thinking and debate from people who believe in the heliocentric model of the universe. There are other questions that you may think of that you can add to this list but here are a few to get you started.

You might want to print this out when talking to a friend or copy-and-paste if you are emailing someone.

+++++

How can we still see the same constellations year after year if they are all traveling at the speed of light in their own directions?

How can we still have the same constellations that were recorded thousands of years ago?

How can we still have the “Big Dipper” after 4,000 years?

Wouldn’t that look more like a frying pan now?

cosmos-1 Astronomers say that we have different size stars. What star can be so huge that it looks like a spotlight in space as big as a galaxy?

If this lighted area is not from a star, what is it from?

If this light area is as big as a galaxy, how can life exist within this brightness?

How can any planet exist without being burned up?

(Showing a picture of some galaxy to a friend that has a lighted area of violet, for example, ask a question based on the color.)

What produces the violet color?

(If your CGI picture has, for example, a pink cloud, ask a question based on this color. It’s always good to add a little humour in it, too. 🙂

What can produce this smoke or cloud that looks like it’s trillions of miles wide?

Can you imagine living in that pollution?

(Referring to the above picture.) What is all that dark junk in the picture? Whatever it is, it’s much bigger than any star or planet.

How can telescopes take pictures behind billions of other stars with their light? Wouldn’t that wash out the light that is closer to our view?

With trillions of planets, how can we see “behind” other stars?

The fact that we can see light from stars that are millions of light years away, how can it get here through a vacuum (that we are told space consists of)?

We are told that some of these pictures are really computer generated pictures, but why aren’t we told specifically which ones? And, if they are, how can we tell the difference? Since we can’t tell the difference – couldn’t they all be fake?

If any pictures are fake, what is the reason do you think for this?

Save

Posted in Planets | Tagged , | Leave a comment