The latest news is of pictures of Pluto taken by a satellite. It was just revealed that the picture just taken is similar to a painting done back in the 1970s. Makes you think about the so-called existence of planets.

Here is the satellite that is suppose to be billions of miles away. Look at it, How in the world do you think this contraption, and that is what it is, a contraption, fly? This flies on what? What is the fuel? There are no solar panels, which would be funny in itself. So, where is the fuel AND the oxygen to burn the fuel? And, of course, the tanks would have to be HUGE to fly billions of miles away.

Also, who took the picture? This is not answered, but if the answer comes back to say, “Well, it’s actually a computer generated picture, then tell the people that. But this still won’t answer the question about the fuel source.

If they admit that it’s a computer generated picture, ask this, “Why don’t they have a real picture of the satellite then on earth, where it was built and superimpose that picture over the computer generated picture? At least it would look more real.” So, why wasn’t this done? Could it just possibly be that the satellite doesn’t exist? So, how much did the space agency charge for something that didn’t exist? LOL.